Relative Intelligence · Communications Equipment

How Ciena (CIEN) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CIEN alone. It places CIEN (Ciena Corporation) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CIEN stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CIEN's full trading record, from February 1997 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, CIEN fell 32.1% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. The slide is CIEN's own: it is 67.3% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is CIEN's own: it fell 9.7% over the past 3 months while the communications equipment ETF IYZ (iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF) fell 1.4%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its communications equipment peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: LITE (Lumentum) rose 7.4%, while FN (Fabrinet) fell 28.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsCIEN has run far ahead of the market, rising 97.5% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (721% against 89.3%). The last two calendar years both went the same way: CIEN rose 176% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termCIEN turned $10,000 into $170,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. CIEN's 10-year return of 1,600% puts it ahead of 98% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashCIEN fell harder than the S&P 500 in five of seven sell-offs. The Covid crash was the exception: CIEN fell 22.4%, less than the S&P 500's 33.7%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 10 years, CIEN's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.07: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.3 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 64% as much. Against the S&P 500, CIEN has a correlation of 0.38 over 5 years, less closely than 52% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- ANET (Arista Networks) and AVGO (Broadcom) earned more than CIEN with less volatility over the past 5 years. ANET returned 49.0% a year at 49.0% volatility, against 45.2% a year at 52.6%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- STX (Seagate Technology, computer hardware) earned more than CIEN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 57.4% a year at 48.7% volatility, against 45.2% a year at 52.6%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 20 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CIEN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AVGO (Broadcom), ANET (Arista Networks) and PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras).
How much would $10,000 in CIEN have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CIEN over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CIEN over the same span and CIEN's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in CIEN at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $20,293 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CIEN, and COHR finished highest, at $922,472.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 921 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CIEN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- COHR$922,472+9,125% total · +16.9% a year
- CSCO$206,586+1,966% total · +11.0% a year
- GLW$155,950+1,460% total · +9.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- DGII$53,499+435% total · +6.0% a year
- VZ$47,395+374% total · +5.5% a year
- NOK$36,874+269% total · +4.6% a year
- CIEN$20,293+103% total · +2.5% a year
- VIAV$18,542+85.4% total · +2.2% a year
- AVNW$373−96.3% total · −10.7% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 58 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CIEN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAOI$138,242+1,282% total · +69.1% a year
- STX$128,799+1,188% total · +66.7% a year
- LITE$116,261+1,063% total · +63.3% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- ANET$94,783+848% total · +56.8% a year
- AVGO$79,117+691% total · +51.2% a year
- CIEN$68,511+585% total · +46.9% a year
- MRVL$44,627+346% total · +34.9% a year
- DGII$36,266+263% total · +29.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
CIEN at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- CIEN is still 67.3% below its all-time high.
- CIEN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1997 was 99.5%, from October 2000 to February 2009. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over 28 full calendar years, CIEN's best was 1999, when it returned 293%, and its worst was 2001, when it lost 82.4%. It lost money in 11 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $48B
- Industry
- Communication Equipment
- Price history from
- February 1997
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +97.5%total return
- Past 3 years
- +721%+102% a year
- Past 5 years
- +546%+45.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,600%+32.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +293%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −82.4%2001
- Losing years
- 11 of 28full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 52.6%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.97return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −99.5%Oct 2000 to Feb 2009
- From its all-time high
- −67.3%below the peak
CIEN against the whole market
Where CIEN ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CIEN rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CIEN on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CIEN stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- CIEN's 3-year return ranks in the top 2% of the 3,017 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CIEN | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +97.5% | 187 of 3,287 | top 6% |
| 3-year return | +721% | 55 of 3,017 | top 2% |
| 5-year return | +546% | 57 of 2,893 | top 2% |
| 10-year return | +1,600% | 54 of 2,202 | top 2% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 52.6% | 2,020 of 2,893 | bottom 31% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.97 | 113 of 2,893 | top 4% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −49.5% | 444 of 2,187 | top 20% |
What has beaten CIEN on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CIEN sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CIEN with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 20 stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CIEN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half CIEN's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, 11% less than CIEN's 52.6%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.46 against 0.97 for CIEN.
- Among CIEN's popular alternatives, AVGO and ANET are in the region. AVGO earned 48.3% a year against 45.2% a year for CIEN, at 44.5% volatility, 15% less than CIEN's 52.6%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CIEN; faint dots are 14 more of the 20 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than CIEN?
Investments that beat CIEN over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among CIEN's popular alternatives, ANET and AVGO earned more than CIEN with less volatility over the past 5 years. ANET returned 49.0% a year at 49.0% volatility, against 45.2% a year at 52.6%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, STX (computer hardware) earned more than CIEN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 57.4% a year at 48.7% volatility, against 45.2% a year at 52.6%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 20 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CIEN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AVGO, ANET and PBR.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CIEN over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CIEN's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than CIEN follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CIEN's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CIEN's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CIEN's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with CIEN?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +45.2% | 52.6% | 0.97 | −49.5% | +1,600% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.38 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against CIEN. 3 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +57.3% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −66.9% | +1,904% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Communications Equipment and the categories next to it (Semiconductors, Electronic Components, Electronics Manufacturing, Computer Hardware), plus CIEN's specific themes. 7 of 70 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.52 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +5,243% | 0.37 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.24 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +53.7% | 53.5% | 1.07 | −70.5% | +911% | 0.54 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +101% | 59.7% | 1.47 | −80.6% | +2,771% | 0.46 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 31 of 3,545 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | -0.11 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.02 | — | ||
BWLPBW LPG Limited · Marine Shipping | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +60.3% | 50.9% | 1.19 | −68.8% | +2,672% | -0.10 | — | |
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.03 | — | ||
BELFBBel Fuse Inc. · Hardware, Equipment & Parts | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatility | +78.0% | 52.1% | 1.37 | −79.8% | +872% | 0.25 | — | |
What these numbers mean for CIEN
- Annual return
- CIEN returned 45.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $64,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CIEN's volatility over the past 5 years was 52.6%, 3.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CIEN's return lands within 52.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CIEN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.97, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CIEN earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CIEN's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 49.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 49.5% fall takes a 98.2% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CIEN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.38 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CIEN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CIEN holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 20 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than CIEN with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with CIEN | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Same or nearby category | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.52 | — | |
| 2 | Popular alternative | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 0.38 | — | |
| 3 | LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | -0.11 | — |
| 4 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.02 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | -0.03 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.37 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.47 | — | |
| 8 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.25 | — |
| 9 | CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,021% | 0.19 | — |
| 10 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.03 | — | |
| 11 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.04 | — |
| 12 | Whole market | +53.4% | 48.6% | 1.13 | −53.3% | +1,195% | 0.21 | — | |
| 13 | FTITechnipFMC plc · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +54.1% | 41.3% | 1.26 | −85.8% | +178% | 0.04 | — |
| 14 | Popular alternative | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.47 | — | |
| 15 | FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +1,194% | 0.08 | — |
| 16 | Same or nearby category | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.46 | — | |
| 17 | TRMDTORM plc · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +54.3% | 45.9% | 1.18 | −60.6% | — | -0.02 | — |
| 18 | TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +50.5% | 45.1% | 1.14 | −63.4% | +490% | -0.04 | — |
| 19 | TENTsakos Energy Navigation Limited · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +46.9% | 46.3% | 1.07 | −68.7% | +211% | -0.01 | — |
| 20 | TKTeekay Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +47.1% | 41.7% | 1.13 | −83.8% | +244% | 0.13 | — |
CIEN against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CIEN, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CIEN's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CIEN, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only ANET and AVGO were both more rewarding and calmer than CIEN over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, CIEN returned 45.2% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (52.6% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CIEN with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| AAOI Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. | +59.6% | 123% |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | +57.3% | 64.5% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | +49.0% | 49.0% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| CIEN This pageCiena Corporation | +45.2% | 52.6% |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | +31.6% | 66.3% |
| GLW Corning Inc | +31.4% | 42.1% |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | +29.5% | 65.2% |
| FN Fabrinet | +29.2% | 57.1% |
| DGII Digi International Inc. | +28.0% | 42.4% |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | +17.9% | 47.9% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.8% | 26.1% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | +16.8% | 48.8% |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | +14.4% | 49.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | +11.6% | 40.1% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | +2.7% | 22.9% |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | −8.3% | 48.5% |
| AVNW Aviat Networks, Inc. | −8.6% | 51.4% |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | −17.3% | 56.4% |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | −17.4% | 86.3% |
Has CIEN consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CIEN with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CIEN helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- LITE outperformed CIEN in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Only one of the 19 popular alternatives, LITE, outperformed CIEN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- AVGO earned more for the risk it took than CIEN (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CIEN over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CIEN Ciena Corporation (this page) | — | −6.6% | −9.7% | −32.1% | +39.0% | +97.5% | +721% | +546% | +1,600% | 52.6% | 0.97 | −49.5% | — | $48B | — |
| LITE QualifiedLumentum Holdings Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −13.8% | +7.4% | −8.1% | +113% | +411% | +2,029% | +863% | +1,904% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −66.9% | — | $75B | — |
| ANET Computer HardwareArista Networks, Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −11.8% | +7.0% | +8.6% | +35.6% | +23.7% | +289% | +634% | +3,439% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | — | $229B | — |
| AAOI Communication EquipmentApplied Optoelectronics, Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −29.4% | −25.5% | −53.1% | +93.8% | +125% | +1,011% | +936% | +270% | 123% | 0.97 | −98.5% | — | $6.5B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| MRVL SemiconductorsMarvell Technology, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −6.6% | +23.4% | +62.7% | +169% | +181% | +390% | +264% | +1,874% | 65.2% | 0.72 | −61.9% | — | $211B | — |
| DGII Communication EquipmentDigi International Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +2.7% | +16.5% | +34.7% | +73.1% | +91.3% | +196% | +243% | +587% | 42.4% | 0.79 | −65.7% | — | $2.8B | — |
| VIAV Communication EquipmentViavi Solutions Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −4.1% | −11.9% | −22.2% | +91.3% | +164% | +359% | +127% | +376% | 47.9% | 0.58 | −62.9% | — | $8.5B | — |
| CSCO Communication EquipmentCisco Systems, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −3.9% | −3.2% | +22.6% | +42.2% | +53.8% | +118% | +118% | +374% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $421B | — |
| CALX Communication EquipmentCalix, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +1.9% | −5.9% | −30.0% | −32.7% | −40.0% | −16.6% | −35.1% | +435% | 48.5% | 0.07 | −65.3% | — | $2.3B | — |
| AVNW Communication EquipmentAviat Networks, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.5% | −6.0% | −13.9% | −10.3% | −16.9% | −26.3% | −36.1% | +334% | 51.4% | 0.09 | −68.6% | — | $249M | — |
| VZ Telecommunications ServicesVerizon Communications Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −5.1% | +4.0% | −1.0% | +17.2% | +16.4% | +71.5% | +14.4% | +55.8% | 22.9% | 0.23 | −41.2% | — | $185B | — |
| UI Communication EquipmentUbiquiti Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +3.2% | +13.8% | −43.9% | +7.3% | −17.3% | +434% | +95.9% | +1,194% | 49.2% | 0.52 | −72.2% | — | $37B | — |
| GLW Hardware, Equipment & PartsCorning Inc | 2/5 short0/3 long | −16.7% | −13.3% | −19.7% | +46.8% | +56.6% | +419% | +292% | +616% | 42.1% | 0.86 | −51.5% | — | $114B | — |
| EXTR Communication EquipmentExtreme Networks, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −2.2% | −26.6% | +21.5% | +34.3% | +8.7% | +6.4% | +117% | +445% | 48.8% | 0.56 | −87.5% | — | $2.9B | — |
| NOK Communication EquipmentNokia Oyj | 2/5 short0/3 long | −17.5% | −10.2% | −14.3% | +40.3% | +60.8% | +211% | +72.8% | +123% | 40.1% | 0.47 | −62.6% | — | $49B | — |
| COHR Hardware, Equipment & PartsCoherent, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −27.9% | −18.8% | −33.3% | +19.3% | +92.8% | +648% | +295% | +795% | 66.3% | 0.75 | −72.2% | — | $46B | — |
| FN Hardware, Equipment & PartsFabrinet | 0/5 short0/3 long | −11.5% | −28.1% | −49.2% | −25.9% | −12.8% | +121% | +260% | +732% | 57.1% | 0.74 | −52.4% | — | $13B | — |
| ADTN Communication EquipmentADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.7% | −43.3% | −62.7% | −24.2% | −28.3% | −8.7% | −61.3% | −59.8% | 56.4% | -0.05 | −82.0% | — | $536M | — |
| LUMN Telecommunications ServicesLumen Technologies, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −30.6% | −29.8% | −48.3% | −41.7% | −37.4% | +222% | −61.5% | −71.8% | 86.3% | 0.17 | −94.4% | — | $4.6B | — |
How did CIEN do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1998, along with where CIEN ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CIEN and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- CIEN finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 15 of its 28 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, AVGO came out ahead of CIEN most often, in 12 of the 16 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CIEN finished in the top quarter in seven of 28 years and in the bottom quarter in seven. In 2025, it ranked 2 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CIEN; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CIEN among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CIEN | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIEN This pageCiena Corporation | — | +176% | +88.4% | −11.7% | −33.8% | +45.6% | +23.8% | +25.9% | +62.0% | −14.3% | +18.0% | +6.6% | −18.9% | +52.4% | +29.8% | −42.5% | +94.2% | +61.8% | −80.4% | +23.1% | +33.3% | −11.1% | −49.1% | +27.6% | −64.1% | −82.4% | +183% | +293% | −76.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 28 | 2 of 20 | 6 of 20 | 14 of 20 | 14 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 10 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 3 of 20 | 16 of 20 | 16 of 20 | 9 of 19 | 12 of 18 | 7 of 17 | 2 of 17 | 13 of 16 | 1 of 14 | 5 of 13 | 13 of 13 | 3 of 13 | 5 of 13 | 7 of 13 | 13 of 13 | 10 of 13 | 10 of 13 | 12 of 13 | 1 of 12 | 2 of 11 | 11 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 28 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 5 of 10 | +339% | +60.2% | +0.5% | −50.7% | +11.6% | +19.6% | +88.8% | −14.1% | +26.5% | +75.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 7 of 11 | +18.6% | +87.7% | +94.1% | −15.6% | +97.9% | +42.9% | −3.5% | −10.5% | +143% | +24.2% | +28.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AAOI Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. | 4 of 12 | −5.4% | +90.8% | +922% | −63.2% | −39.6% | −28.4% | −23.0% | −59.2% | +61.4% | +36.6% | +52.9% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 12 of 16 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% | +46.1% | +93.4% | +70.0% | +12.0% | +3.0% | +55.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 16 of 25 | −22.8% | +83.8% | +63.7% | −57.5% | +84.6% | +80.3% | +65.7% | −23.6% | +56.9% | +60.5% | −37.8% | +2.5% | +102% | −46.7% | −25.3% | −10.6% | +211% | −52.3% | −27.1% | −31.6% | +58.1% | +87.1% | +101% | −47.2% | +63.5% | — | — | — |
| DGII Digi International Inc. | 11 of 28 | +43.2% | +16.3% | −28.9% | +48.8% | +30.0% | +6.7% | +75.6% | +5.7% | −30.6% | +20.8% | +22.5% | −23.4% | +28.0% | −15.1% | +0.5% | +21.7% | +12.4% | −42.9% | +2.9% | +31.5% | −39.0% | +79.1% | +230% | −54.3% | +3.9% | −41.3% | −6.2% | −34.5% |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 13 of 28 | +76.4% | +0.3% | −4.2% | −40.4% | +17.6% | −0.1% | +49.3% | +15.0% | +6.9% | +34.3% | −21.9% | +5.5% | −3.8% | +29.3% | −27.9% | +75.7% | +125% | −72.5% | −20.2% | −11.7% | −25.6% | −12.9% | +47.3% | −71.5% | −79.2% | −48.3% | +830% | +67.6% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 12 of 28 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% | +13.8% | +16.6% | +31.3% | +15.1% | +0.6% | +28.0% | +16.7% | +11.6% | −9.6% | −15.5% | +46.9% | −39.8% | −1.0% | +59.7% | −11.4% | −20.3% | +85.0% | −27.7% | −52.6% | −28.6% | +131% | +150% |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | 4 of 15 | +51.8% | −20.2% | −36.1% | −14.4% | +169% | +272% | −17.9% | +63.9% | −22.7% | −2.2% | −21.5% | +3.9% | +25.4% | +18.9% | −61.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AVNW Aviat Networks, Inc. | 14 of 28 | +18.1% | −44.5% | +4.7% | −2.8% | +87.8% | +143% | +6.0% | −12.7% | +9.7% | +49.8% | −48.7% | −33.6% | −31.3% | +79.8% | −63.9% | −26.6% | +33.9% | −69.1% | −13.6% | +34.9% | +58.4% | −47.4% | +94.6% | −71.6% | −48.1% | −36.0% | +242% | −52.8% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 11 of 28 | +8.9% | +13.1% | +2.7% | −20.0% | −7.5% | −0.1% | +13.8% | +11.3% | +4.0% | +20.7% | +3.6% | −0.5% | +18.6% | +13.2% | +18.2% | +23.0% | +3.8% | −20.1% | +22.1% | +34.0% | −22.2% | +20.1% | −5.7% | −15.3% | −2.6% | −16.9% | +17.0% | +22.4% |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 7 of 14 | +67.7% | +141% | −48.2% | −10.0% | +10.8% | +48.5% | +91.7% | +40.7% | +22.9% | +82.4% | +7.0% | −35.2% | +279% | −32.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GLW Corning Inc | 14 of 28 | +87.8% | +60.7% | −1.2% | −11.6% | +5.9% | +27.6% | −1.0% | −3.3% | +34.6% | +36.3% | −18.4% | +31.2% | +45.1% | −0.2% | −31.9% | +1.1% | +106% | −59.8% | +28.7% | −4.8% | +67.2% | +12.7% | +215% | −62.8% | −83.0% | +23.3% | +190% | +23.6% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 12 of 26 | −0.5% | −5.1% | −3.7% | +16.6% | +128% | −6.5% | +20.8% | −51.3% | +149% | +23.3% | +15.6% | −49.4% | +91.8% | +24.7% | −5.5% | +7.7% | +22.7% | −33.9% | −15.5% | −11.8% | −27.5% | −9.2% | +120% | −74.7% | −67.0% | −6.3% | — | — |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 12 of 28 | +50.7% | +34.6% | −23.9% | −24.4% | +59.3% | +5.2% | −34.9% | +29.7% | −0.3% | −27.8% | −8.4% | +3.0% | +105% | −11.5% | −50.3% | −16.0% | −14.5% | −58.2% | +93.4% | +13.5% | +20.0% | −6.1% | +12.0% | −36.1% | −43.0% | −8.6% | +219% | +251% |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 15 of 28 | +94.8% | +118% | +24.0% | −48.6% | −10.1% | +126% | +3.7% | −30.9% | +58.4% | +59.8% | +36.0% | −22.4% | −3.6% | +5.4% | −20.8% | +45.8% | +66.5% | −37.5% | +9.3% | +56.3% | −15.8% | +64.8% | +60.6% | −6.9% | +13.4% | +51.0% | +156% | −67.2% |
| FN Fabrinet | 9 of 15 | +107% | +15.5% | +48.4% | +8.2% | +52.7% | +19.7% | +26.4% | +78.8% | −28.8% | +69.2% | +34.3% | −13.7% | +56.5% | −4.0% | −36.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 14 of 28 | +4.3% | +13.5% | −59.9% | −16.3% | +57.4% | +54.4% | −5.2% | −43.2% | −12.0% | +32.4% | −19.3% | −18.0% | +40.5% | −34.2% | −15.9% | +62.7% | +54.2% | −29.1% | −4.4% | −22.5% | +57.6% | −37.7% | +98.0% | +28.8% | +20.1% | −58.7% | +181% | −33.4% |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 9 of 28 | +46.3% | +190% | −64.9% | −55.5% | +38.7% | −19.1% | −5.3% | +2.0% | −21.7% | +2.2% | −31.9% | +31.7% | −13.2% | +13.1% | −13.2% | +38.0% | +44.9% | −29.6% | −4.5% | +32.6% | −5.9% | +9.6% | +11.9% | −9.8% | −7.6% | −24.1% | +5.7% | +105% |
Risk and diversification
How CIEN has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CIEN's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CIEN's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1997, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of CIEN's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CIEN fell 50.3% from March to April 2000, while the S&P 500 slipped only 1.5%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 16 months, after CIEN fell 90.8% from July to October 1998.
Green means CIEN fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CIEN fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −99.5% | −38.3% | Oct 2000 | Feb 2009 | 8.3 years | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −90.8% | −14.9% | Jul 1998 | Oct 1998 | 3 months | Feb 2000 | 16 months |
| Dot-com bust | −50.3% | −1.5% | Mar 2000 | Apr 2000 | 1 month | Aug 2000 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −47.4% | −4.0% | Feb 1997 | Apr 1997 | 2 months | May 1997 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −38.9% | +7.0% | Oct 1997 | Feb 1998 | 4 months | Jun 1998 | 4 months |
How did CIEN do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CIEN, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, NOK held up best, falling less than CIEN in nine of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- CIEN fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when CIEN fell 98.4% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CIEN.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIEN This pageCiena Corporation | — | −2.9% | −48.4% | −22.4% | −11.8% | −4.7% | −31.7% | −41.8% | −5.1% | −89.5% | −98.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 1 of 6 | −6.5% | −36.3% | −28.7% | −40.1% | −5.0% | −34.1% | — | — | — | — |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −1.5% | −36.6% | −31.2% | −31.2% | −6.1% | −36.6% | — | — | — | — |
| AAOI Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −5.7% | −71.6% | −54.5% | −58.8% | −8.1% | −45.1% | — | — | — | — |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 4 of 8 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −12.0% | −56.8% | −31.6% | −26.1% | −7.5% | −37.6% | −23.1% | 0.0% | −74.3% | — |
| DGII Digi International Inc. | 5 of 10 | −4.7% | −26.1% | −57.4% | −30.9% | −4.7% | −39.4% | −26.9% | −2.7% | −61.8% | −84.3% |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 5 of 10 | −3.0% | −27.2% | −37.5% | −26.5% | −3.0% | −27.6% | −41.5% | −4.5% | −86.0% | −98.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | 1 of 8 | −7.8% | −56.1% | −44.0% | −21.9% | −2.4% | −34.3% | −64.5% | −10.3% | — | — |
| AVNW Aviat Networks, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −6.9% | −27.6% | −45.0% | −28.3% | −9.8% | −54.9% | −45.8% | −2.7% | −83.4% | −97.8% |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 7 of 10 | −2.6% | −33.2% | −13.6% | −12.5% | −7.4% | −10.5% | −9.9% | 0.0% | −43.9% | −55.2% |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 2 of 6 | −3.5% | −26.5% | −22.7% | −17.6% | −14.4% | −26.2% | — | — | — | — |
| GLW Corning Inc | 5 of 10 | −3.8% | −30.9% | −36.7% | −21.7% | −9.0% | −13.5% | −31.1% | 0.0% | −71.6% | −99.0% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −4.6% | −43.9% | −71.0% | −23.0% | −26.4% | −46.8% | −30.5% | −4.8% | −75.8% | −98.0% |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 9 of 10 | −2.1% | −32.1% | −42.4% | −9.7% | −2.8% | −23.3% | −21.1% | 0.0% | −78.1% | −82.1% |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −10.7% | −56.3% | −43.0% | −39.5% | −9.8% | −15.0% | −40.4% | −2.1% | −68.2% | −61.4% |
| FN Fabrinet | 4 of 7 | −4.7% | −38.7% | −25.0% | −12.0% | −3.8% | −10.5% | −30.8% | — | — | — |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 7 of 10 | −8.6% | −28.9% | −45.4% | −43.5% | −2.5% | −13.2% | −26.6% | −0.1% | −52.3% | −81.1% |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −13.9% | −49.4% | −33.7% | −34.8% | −9.8% | −21.3% | −17.7% | −1.5% | −50.8% | −43.7% |
How closely does CIEN move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CIEN with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- None of the 19 popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CIEN's 2.02.
- Over the past 10 years, CIEN captured 129% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 64% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.07. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CIEN's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIEN This pageCiena Corporation | 129% | 64% | 2.02 | 1.07 |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 174% | 91% | 1.92 | 1.40 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 162% | 101% | 1.61 | 1.24 |
| GLW Corning Inc | 107% | 67% | 1.61 | 1.14 |
| FN Fabrinet | 115% | 72% | 1.60 | 1.12 |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 167% | 116% | 1.44 | 1.68 |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 98% | 76% | 1.30 | 0.97 |
| AVNW Aviat Networks, Inc. | 86% | 70% | 1.22 | 1.41 |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 150% | 125% | 1.19 | 1.35 |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | 96% | 85% | 1.14 | 1.40 |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 162% | 146% | 1.11 | 1.80 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 101% | 96% | 1.06 | 0.97 |
| DGII Digi International Inc. | 137% | 137% | 1.00 | 1.29 |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 63% | 72% | 0.87 | 1.01 |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 144% | 172% | 0.84 | 1.88 |
| AAOI Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. | 169% | 221% | 0.77 | 2.83 |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 44% | 60% | 0.74 | 0.36 |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 99% | 255% | 0.39 | 1.44 |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 47% | 150% | 0.31 | 1.46 |
What diversifies CIEN?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CIEN's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CIEN with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CIEN into MPC would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+46.9% for CIEN alone, +51.2% for the mix).
- MCK made money in eight of the 11 calendar years in which CIEN lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of CIEN over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.26 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CIEN lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CIEN and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2017 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIEN Ciena Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +546% | 0.97 | −11.7% | −33.8% | −14.3% | −18.9% | −42.5% | −80.4% | −11.1% | −49.1% | −64.1% | −82.4% | −76.1% | 52.1% | +46.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.17 | +119% | 1.48 | +17.4% | +3.8% | +10.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.1% | +43.0% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.26 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +6.0% | +22.8% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 42.4% | +45.2% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.16 | +101% | 1.04 | +8.0% | +10.4% | +1.1% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.3% | +42.6% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.11 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +1.8% | +7.1% | +13.5% | +12.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.1% | +41.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.42 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | −33.5% | +38.5% | +30.2% | +6.8% | −44.7% | +10.8% | −19.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 45.1% | +47.3% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.30 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | −5.1% | +16.7% | +3.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.4% | +42.0% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.20 | +126% | 0.96 | +12.7% | −0.8% | +12.8% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | — | — | — | 42.5% | +43.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.41 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | −10.4% | +27.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43.5% | +43.6% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2017 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIEN Ciena Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +546% | 0.97 | −11.7% | −33.8% | −14.3% | −18.9% | −42.5% | −80.4% | −11.1% | −49.1% | −64.1% | −82.4% | −76.1% | 52.1% | +46.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.12 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | +54.1% | −12.7% | +23.0% | +8.1% | −39.6% | +18.7% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +51.7% | 42.6% | +48.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.46 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | +1.3% | −11.6% | +12.9% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.2% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −25.6% | — | 48.2% | +61.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.47 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +17.0% | +32.1% | −10.4% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +20.1% | +40.0% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −9.5% | 46.6% | +57.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.11 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | +51.8% | +12.0% | +29.3% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +64.9% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +46.9% | 42.6% | +47.6% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.02 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | +86.6% | +34.8% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.3% | +51.2% |
Common questions
What was CIEN's worst drawdown?
CIEN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1997 was 99.5%, from October 2000 to February 2009. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
What were CIEN's best and worst years?
Over 28 full calendar years, CIEN's best year was 1999, when it returned 293%. Its worst was 2001, with a return of -82.4%.
Is there a better investment than CIEN?
Among CIEN's popular alternatives, ANET and AVGO earned more than CIEN with less volatility over the past 5 years. ANET returned 49.0% a year at 49.0% volatility, against 45.2% a year at 52.6%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, STX (computer hardware) earned more than CIEN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 57.4% a year at 48.7% volatility, against 45.2% a year at 52.6%.
Is CIEN more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CIEN's volatility over the past 5 years was 52.6%, 3.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CIEN's return lands within 52.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CIEN's Sharpe ratio?
CIEN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.97, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CIEN earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CIEN with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CIEN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.38 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CIEN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CIEN holding.
What are the best alternatives to CIEN?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed CIEN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: LITE.
Did CIEN outperform the S&P 500?
CIEN finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 15 of 28 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +176%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CIEN do in stock market crashes?
CIEN fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when CIEN fell 98.4% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies CIEN?
These had a low correlation with CIEN over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.17), DXJ (correlation 0.26) and EMLP (correlation 0.16); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.12), CLS (correlation 0.46) and FIX (correlation 0.47). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CIEN's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CIEN's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to CIEN
LITELumentum
ANETArista Networks
AVGOBroadcom
MRVLMarvell Technology
CSCOCisco Systems
VZVerizon Communications
GLWCorning
NOKNokia Oyj
COHRCoherent