Relative Intelligence · Integrated Oil & Gas

How Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR-A) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on PBR-A alone. It places PBR-A (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where PBR-A stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: PBR-A's full trading record, from February 2001 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowPBR-A has run far ahead of the market, rising 47.0% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?PBR-A's 47.0% gain over the past 3 months far outran its industry: the integrated oil & gas ETF XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) rose 18.0%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: PBR-A rose 23.3% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, PBR-A rose 130% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (133% against 89.3%). Even so, PBR-A led its integrated oil & gas peers in 2023, then fell behind PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termPBR-A turned $10,000 into $86,800 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. PBR-A's 10-year return of 768% puts it ahead of 93% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, PBR-A has typically fallen 2.2 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationPBR-A is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.18 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.18 with the total US market, less closely than 88% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- VLO (Valero Energy) was ahead of PBR-A in most short and long periods.
- Nearby categories and themes
- INSW (International Seaways, oil & gas) earned more than PBR-A over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 56.5% a year at 40.5% volatility, against 51.8% a year at 37.5%.
- Whole market
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PBR-A with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How much would $10,000 in PBR-A have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in PBR-A over the past 25 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of PBR-A over the same span and PBR-A's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in PBR-A at the end of September 2001 would have grown to $261,250 by September 2026, more than the $114,557 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of PBR-A, and FIX finished highest, at $6,834,667.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2001 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 264 of the 1,326 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PBR-A; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- FIX$7M+68,247% total · +29.8% a year
- VLO$907,686+8,977% total · +19.8% a year
- FRO$487,805+4,778% total · +16.8% a year
- ASX$415,507+4,055% total · +16.1% a year
- LLY$282,413+2,724% total · +14.3% a year
- PBR-A$261,250+2,513% total · +13.9% a year
- PBR$254,233+2,442% total · +13.8% a year
- SU$174,925+1,649% total · +12.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$114,557+1,046% total · +10.2% a year
- YPF$91,817+818% total · +9.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 60 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PBR-A; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- FIX$236,701+2,267% total · +88.3% a year
- DELL$112,363+1,024% total · +62.2% a year
- YPF$107,580+976% total · +60.8% a year
- INSW$102,075+921% total · +59.1% a year
- FRO$81,979+720% total · +52.3% a year
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- PBR-A$67,821+578% total · +46.6% a year
- VLO$64,131+541% total · +45.0% a year
- SU$40,398+304% total · +32.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
PBR-A at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- PBR-A's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 96.0%, from May 2008 to January 2016. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- PBR-A is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 24 full calendar years, PBR-A's best was 2016, when it returned 159%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 55.4%. It lost money in ten of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $157B
- Industry
- Oil & Gas Integrated
- Price history from
- February 2001
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +130%total return
- Past 3 years
- +133%+32.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +705%+51.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +768%+24.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +159%2016
- Worst calendar year
- −55.4%2008
- Losing years
- 10 of 24full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 37.5%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.31return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −96.0%May 2008 to Jan 2016
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
PBR-A against the whole market
Where PBR-A ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does PBR-A rank among all stocks?
This section ranks PBR-A on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how PBR-A stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), PBR-A ranks in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | PBR-A | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +130% | 107 of 3,287 | top 3% |
| 3-year return | +133% | 690 of 3,017 | top 23% |
| 5-year return | +705% | 41 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| 10-year return | +768% | 165 of 2,202 | top 7% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 37.5% | 1,301 of 2,893 | top 45% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.31 | 11 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −71.7% | 1,340 of 2,187 | bottom 40% |
What has beaten PBR-A on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). PBR-A sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than PBR-A with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- None of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PBR-A over the past 5 years with less volatility: nothing sits in the green region.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to PBR-A. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than PBR-A?
Investments that beat PBR-A over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among PBR-A's popular alternatives, VLO was ahead of PBR-A in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, INSW (oil & gas) earned more than PBR-A over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 56.5% a year at 40.5% volatility, against 51.8% a year at 37.5%.
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PBR-A with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat PBR-A over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks PBR-A's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than PBR-A's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× PBR-A's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than PBR-A's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with PBR-A?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.18 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against PBR-A. 1 of 17 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 3 shownEverything else in Integrated Oil & Gas and Oil & Gas and the categories next to it (Exploration & Production, Oil & Gas Midstream, Oilfield Services), plus PBR-A's specific themes. 3 of 67 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | 0.29 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.44 | — | ||
FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Higher return in most periods | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +1,194% | 0.22 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 23 of 3,549 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.18 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.04 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | -0.12 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.02 | — | ||
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.07 | — | ||
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.08 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for PBR-A
- Annual return
- PBR-A returned 51.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $80,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- PBR-A's volatility over the past 5 years was 37.5%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PBR-A's return lands within 37.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- PBR-A's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.31, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PBR-A earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- PBR-A's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 71.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 71.7% fall takes a 254% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, PBR-A's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.18 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PBR-A instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PBR-A holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
PBR-A against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against PBR-A, compared period by period and year by year.
How do PBR-A's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at PBR-A, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 17 popular alternatives earned more than PBR-A over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, PBR-A returned 51.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (37.5% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than PBR-A with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| YPF YPF Sociedad Anónima | +60.7% | 54.1% |
| PBR-A This pagePetróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | +51.8% | 37.5% |
| PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | +50.3% | 37.5% |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | +44.2% | 36.9% |
| SU Suncor Energy Inc. | +33.1% | 32.5% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | +27.1% | 26.5% |
| CVE Cenovus Energy Inc. | +26.6% | 39.4% |
| E Eni S.p.A. | +23.0% | 25.6% |
| SHEL Shell plc | +21.0% | 24.8% |
| BKR Baker Hughes Company | +19.8% | 34.6% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | +19.5% | 25.2% |
| EQNR Equinor ASA | +19.2% | 34.4% |
| TTE TotalEnergies SE | +18.0% | 25.8% |
| EC Ecopetrol S.A. | +18.0% | 37.9% |
| BP BP p.l.c. | +16.0% | 28.7% |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | +15.2% | 37.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| SLB Slb N.V. | +10.0% | 37.5% |
| HAL Halliburton Company | +6.9% | 39.4% |
Has PBR-A consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares PBR-A with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than PBR-A helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 17 popular alternatives, VLO, outperformed PBR-A in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than PBR-A over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| PBR-A Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (this page) | — | +23.3% | +47.0% | +30.3% | +117% | +130% | +133% | +705% | +768% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | — | $157B | — |
| VLO QualifiedValero Energy Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | +10.2% | +38.9% | +93.2% | +166% | +176% | +259% | +524% | +1,061% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | — | $125B | — |
| YPF Oil & Gas IntegratedYPF Sociedad Anónima | 0/5 short2/3 long | −4.5% | +0.7% | +23.9% | +39.9% | +102% | +313% | +971% | +173% | 54.1% | 1.14 | −90.1% | — | $20B | — |
| SU Oil & Gas IntegratedSuncor Energy Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +16.7% | +26.8% | +28.9% | +75.6% | +111% | +161% | +318% | +295% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | — | $93B | — |
| PBR Oil & Gas IntegratedPetróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 3/5 short0/3 long | +24.6% | +45.4% | +31.0% | +128% | +140% | +132% | +667% | +674% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | — | $166B | — |
| EC Oil & Gas IntegratedEcopetrol S.A. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.0% | +10.3% | +35.7% | +81.5% | +112% | +116% | +129% | +401% | 37.9% | 0.63 | −73.3% | — | $36B | — |
| CVE Oil & Gas IntegratedCenovus Energy Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.1% | +18.0% | +34.6% | +92.4% | +101% | +76.2% | +225% | +163% | 39.4% | 0.80 | −89.2% | — | $61B | — |
| EQNR Oil & Gas IntegratedEquinor ASA | 0/5 short0/3 long | +7.7% | +23.4% | +29.6% | +92.7% | +107% | +73.2% | +141% | +416% | 34.4% | 0.69 | −66.8% | — | $109B | — |
| E Oil & Gas IntegratedEni S.p.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +10.2% | +20.3% | +14.6% | +56.0% | +77.9% | +120% | +181% | +278% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | — | $86B | — |
| BKR Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesBaker Hughes Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.8% | +1.3% | −5.3% | +19.3% | +22.1% | +70.1% | +146% | +248% | 34.6% | 0.70 | −73.5% | — | $55B | — |
| CVX Oil & Gas IntegratedChevron Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +10.8% | +20.0% | +25.4% | +48.8% | +51.9% | +53.4% | +144% | +238% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | — | $446B | — |
| TTE Oil & Gas IntegratedTotalEnergies SE | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.2% | +12.8% | +5.7% | +40.3% | +55.2% | +60.5% | +129% | +234% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | — | $201B | — |
| SHEL Oil & Gas IntegratedShell plc | 0/5 short0/3 long | +13.2% | +23.5% | +22.1% | +43.7% | +50.3% | +77.1% | +159% | +233% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | — | $301B | — |
| XOM Oil & Gas IntegratedExxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +12.4% | +20.7% | +22.0% | +47.9% | +62.4% | +76.7% | +232% | +214% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | — | $731B | — |
| BP Oil & Gas IntegratedBP p.l.c. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +14.4% | +19.0% | +12.1% | +43.0% | +56.3% | +46.5% | +110% | +141% | 28.7% | 0.66 | −63.9% | — | $130B | — |
| OXY Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOccidental Petroleum Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +9.9% | +14.5% | +16.6% | +50.6% | +56.4% | +2.0% | +103% | +11.6% | 37.9% | 0.56 | −88.4% | — | $63B | — |
| HAL Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesHalliburton Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | +0.6% | −3.9% | −7.6% | +15.0% | +51.5% | −14.7% | +39.8% | −17.1% | 39.4% | 0.37 | −91.5% | — | $28B | — |
| SLB Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesSlb N.V. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.4% | +8.3% | −3.3% | +26.4% | +53.2% | −7.2% | +60.7% | −21.3% | 37.5% | 0.44 | −84.5% | — | $74B | — |
How did PBR-A do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2002, along with where PBR-A ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with PBR-A and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- PBR-A finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 24 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, CVE came out ahead of PBR-A most often, in ten of the 16 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, PBR-A finished in the top quarter in ten of 24 years and in the bottom quarter in eight. In 2025, it ranked 14 of 18.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of PBR-A; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places PBR-A among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of PBR-A | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBR-A This pagePetróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | — | +6.3% | −5.1% | +113% | +54.4% | +12.8% | −25.8% | +32.4% | +23.2% | +11.5% | +159% | −55.2% | −45.3% | −21.1% | −15.9% | −29.3% | −16.5% | +114% | −55.4% | +113% | +50.0% | +81.6% | +43.4% | +109% | −39.8% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 10 of 24 | 14 of 18 | 9 of 18 | 1 of 18 | 10 of 18 | 16 of 18 | 5 of 18 | 3 of 18 | 2 of 18 | 10 of 18 | 1 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 16 of 18 | 15 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 16 of 18 | 1 of 17 | 11 of 16 | 2 of 16 | 2 of 16 | 3 of 16 | 5 of 16 | 3 of 16 | 16 of 16 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 13 of 24 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 14 of 24 | +37.0% | −2.9% | +5.9% | +75.0% | +40.3% | −35.7% | +30.3% | −15.7% | +40.0% | +0.7% | +46.8% | +0.3% | +65.0% | +66.3% | −7.8% | +39.6% | −20.3% | −68.5% | +37.9% | −0.4% | +128% | +97.9% | +26.6% | −2.1% |
| YPF YPF Sociedad Anónima | 11 of 24 | −14.9% | +147% | +87.1% | +141% | −18.7% | −59.4% | −12.9% | −41.2% | +39.5% | +5.8% | −40.3% | −19.3% | +128% | −57.4% | −24.8% | +23.2% | +5.2% | +26.5% | −5.7% | −4.0% | +27.4% | +32.8% | +246% | −31.6% |
| SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 11 of 24 | +29.7% | +16.2% | +6.0% | +32.3% | +55.0% | −46.6% | +22.1% | −21.3% | +15.8% | +31.2% | −16.3% | −7.0% | +8.6% | +16.2% | −23.8% | +9.9% | +82.6% | −64.0% | +38.4% | +25.4% | +79.0% | +42.3% | +61.2% | −3.9% |
| PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 7 of 24 | +2.3% | −2.9% | +89.6% | +55.4% | +19.3% | −29.0% | +24.2% | +27.7% | +1.8% | +135% | −41.1% | −45.1% | −28.3% | −20.0% | −32.1% | −18.1% | +101% | −55.6% | +132% | +51.1% | +85.0% | +43.9% | +111% | −32.0% |
| EC Ecopetrol S.A. | 6 of 17 | +48.5% | −24.6% | +40.1% | −5.0% | +0.8% | −29.3% | +38.7% | +13.5% | +64.4% | +28.9% | −55.7% | −52.3% | −31.5% | +41.5% | +6.1% | +85.1% | +41.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CVE Cenovus Energy Inc. | 10 of 16 | +15.8% | −5.9% | −12.3% | +61.1% | +105% | −39.6% | +47.2% | −21.6% | −38.6% | +21.1% | −36.1% | −25.3% | −11.9% | +3.6% | +2.3% | +35.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EQNR Equinor ASA | 13 of 24 | +7.7% | −16.0% | −0.8% | +42.9% | +64.6% | −13.6% | −1.0% | +3.4% | +23.4% | +38.3% | −16.6% | −22.5% | +1.4% | +2.1% | +12.7% | −0.1% | +57.8% | −43.2% | +22.8% | +22.0% | +51.4% | +45.6% | +43.8% | +31.8% |
| E Eni S.p.A. | 10 of 24 | +49.0% | −13.6% | +27.5% | +11.0% | +44.9% | −28.1% | +4.8% | +0.6% | +9.2% | +15.9% | −8.8% | −23.6% | +4.8% | +26.6% | +1.0% | −7.2% | +13.4% | −29.9% | +12.9% | +20.6% | +10.8% | +39.6% | +28.8% | +32.9% |
| BKR Baker Hughes Company | 12 of 24 | +13.4% | +23.2% | +18.6% | +26.0% | +19.0% | −15.2% | +23.0% | −30.4% | +25.1% | +43.7% | −16.3% | +3.0% | +37.8% | −14.4% | −13.9% | +43.8% | +29.0% | −59.9% | +9.6% | +24.0% | +44.3% | +35.2% | +2.0% | −9.8% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 12 of 24 | +10.1% | +1.3% | −13.6% | +58.5% | +46.2% | −25.9% | +15.3% | −9.7% | +10.6% | +36.7% | −16.2% | −7.0% | +19.3% | +5.1% | +20.3% | +22.9% | +8.1% | −18.3% | +30.5% | +33.7% | +11.5% | +25.6% | +35.4% | −23.2% |
| TTE TotalEnergies SE | 12 of 24 | +27.6% | −14.7% | +14.1% | +34.9% | +26.0% | −16.6% | +10.3% | −0.8% | +14.3% | +20.0% | −7.0% | −12.1% | +25.0% | +8.0% | +1.7% | −11.3% | +22.6% | −29.8% | +18.9% | +21.3% | +18.8% | +22.6% | +33.4% | +4.0% |
| SHEL Shell plc | 12 of 24 | +22.2% | −0.9% | +20.2% | +36.0% | +28.4% | −37.4% | +7.7% | −7.5% | +31.0% | +28.2% | −27.1% | −1.3% | +9.0% | −0.9% | +14.8% | +17.6% | +20.9% | −34.2% | +23.5% | +19.3% | +12.8% | +14.4% | +24.5% | −7.3% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 12 of 24 | +16.0% | +11.3% | −6.3% | +87.4% | +57.6% | −36.2% | +7.2% | −15.1% | −3.8% | +19.9% | −12.8% | −6.0% | +20.1% | +4.7% | +18.7% | +10.1% | −12.6% | −13.1% | +24.3% | +39.1% | +11.8% | +28.1% | +20.7% | −8.9% |
| BP BP p.l.c. | 10 of 24 | +24.5% | −11.9% | +6.0% | +37.0% | +36.4% | −41.3% | +5.9% | −4.6% | +20.0% | +28.8% | −12.8% | −17.6% | +22.8% | +2.0% | +0.5% | −22.7% | +32.9% | −32.5% | +13.2% | +8.0% | +13.6% | +22.2% | +26.4% | −9.5% |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 9 of 24 | −14.9% | −15.9% | −4.1% | +119% | +67.7% | −56.6% | −28.3% | −13.1% | +8.5% | +9.8% | −12.7% | −8.9% | +27.8% | −16.1% | −2.6% | +22.7% | +38.4% | −20.7% | +60.2% | +24.2% | +39.2% | +41.3% | +53.1% | +11.0% |
| HAL Halliburton Company | 13 of 24 | +7.0% | −23.2% | −6.5% | +74.5% | +22.0% | −21.2% | −4.9% | −44.6% | −8.9% | +61.7% | −11.9% | −21.6% | +47.9% | +1.6% | −14.8% | +37.3% | +68.3% | −51.5% | +23.3% | +1.1% | +59.4% | +53.4% | +42.1% | +47.2% |
| SLB Slb N.V. | 9 of 24 | +3.3% | −24.5% | −0.8% | +81.1% | +39.6% | −43.8% | +17.8% | −44.7% | −18.5% | +23.5% | −16.3% | −3.6% | +32.1% | +3.0% | −17.2% | +30.0% | +56.2% | −56.5% | +57.1% | +31.1% | +46.6% | +23.8% | +32.0% | −22.2% |
Risk and diversification
How PBR-A has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were PBR-A's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents PBR-A's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2001, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of PBR-A's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: PBR-A fell 96.0% from May 2008 to January 2016, while the S&P 500 rose 58.5%.
- The slowest recovery came after PBR-A fell 96.0% from May 2008 to January 2016; it did not regain that peak until February 2024, eight years later.
Green means PBR-A fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | PBR-A fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −96.0% | +58.5% | May 2008 | Jan 2016 | 7.7 years | Feb 2024 | 8.1 years |
| Dot-com bust | −67.8% | −29.9% | Feb 2001 | Oct 2002 | 20 months | Dec 2003 | 14 months |
| No named crash | −32.6% | −7.6% | May 2006 | Jun 2006 | 1 month | Dec 2006 | 6 months |
| No named crash | −32.0% | −4.4% | Apr 2004 | May 2004 | 1 month | Sep 2004 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −27.0% | −7.7% | Jul 2007 | Aug 2007 | 1 month | Sep 2007 | 1 month |
How did PBR-A do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far PBR-A, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: PBR-A began trading on February 22, 2001, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- PBR-A fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when PBR-A fell 65.8% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CVX held up best, falling less than PBR-A in all nine crashes they both traded through.
- PBR-A began trading after the dot-com bust, but 13 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was E's 22.9%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than PBR-A.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBR-A This pagePetróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | — | −7.2% | −27.1% | −69.1% | −27.8% | −7.8% | −65.8% | −36.3% | −1.2% | −80.2% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 5 of 9 | −3.5% | −31.9% | −61.3% | −42.0% | −6.9% | −24.2% | −35.6% | −4.3% | −80.7% | −54.1% |
| YPF YPF Sociedad Anónima | 4 of 9 | −17.8% | −45.2% | −73.5% | −27.3% | −8.9% | −48.7% | −22.0% | −1.6% | −65.2% | −75.8% |
| SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 5 of 9 | −6.4% | −36.6% | −65.3% | −34.0% | −7.0% | −34.7% | −42.2% | −0.2% | −79.9% | −25.4% |
| PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 2 of 9 | −7.6% | −26.6% | −71.2% | −26.3% | −8.4% | −54.9% | −37.6% | −1.6% | −80.1% | — |
| EC Ecopetrol S.A. | 4 of 8 | −8.4% | −48.6% | −67.3% | −44.6% | −12.6% | −49.1% | −15.5% | −0.3% | — | — |
| CVE Cenovus Energy Inc. | 2 of 8 | −7.1% | −40.4% | −82.3% | −37.9% | −16.4% | −42.5% | −26.3% | −0.9% | — | — |
| EQNR Equinor ASA | 7 of 9 | −2.8% | −24.5% | −49.0% | −29.1% | −4.4% | −34.9% | −19.9% | −1.0% | −68.4% | — |
| E Eni S.p.A. | 7 of 9 | −2.5% | −33.7% | −49.7% | −23.2% | −6.9% | −30.6% | −25.1% | −1.1% | −61.8% | −22.9% |
| BKR Baker Hughes Company | 3 of 9 | −10.5% | −46.5% | −55.2% | −39.0% | −14.6% | −33.1% | −44.2% | −3.4% | −73.2% | −47.8% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 9 of 9 | −2.6% | −24.9% | −51.0% | −19.6% | −5.3% | −18.5% | −17.2% | −0.1% | −43.8% | −29.5% |
| TTE TotalEnergies SE | 8 of 9 | −4.5% | −24.6% | −49.3% | −22.2% | −5.4% | −21.5% | −26.0% | −2.1% | −50.8% | −25.1% |
| SHEL Shell plc | 8 of 9 | −3.7% | −25.0% | −57.0% | −19.1% | −6.3% | −35.9% | −19.6% | −2.6% | −53.7% | −36.2% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 8 of 9 | −3.1% | −20.5% | −47.9% | −23.6% | −10.0% | −15.0% | −19.6% | −0.3% | −33.7% | −33.6% |
| BP BP p.l.c. | 8 of 9 | −4.2% | −23.9% | −55.5% | −20.9% | −5.0% | −22.9% | −23.9% | −2.5% | −53.4% | −31.1% |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 5 of 9 | −4.6% | −22.9% | −76.8% | −30.5% | −7.3% | −21.4% | −36.1% | 0.0% | −58.1% | −28.4% |
| HAL Halliburton Company | 2 of 9 | −10.2% | −45.5% | −79.1% | −40.0% | −10.5% | −32.7% | −49.8% | −4.3% | −75.0% | −82.8% |
| SLB Slb N.V. | 3 of 9 | −8.8% | −36.8% | −64.9% | −43.6% | −10.9% | −27.1% | −38.9% | −3.8% | −68.0% | −59.8% |
How closely does PBR-A move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares PBR-A with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- None of the 17 popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than PBR-A's 1.95.
- Over the past 10 years, PBR-A captured 106% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 54% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.97. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than PBR-A's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBR-A This pagePetróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 106% | 54% | 1.95 | 0.97 |
| PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 104% | 63% | 1.66 | 0.99 |
| EQNR Equinor ASA | 79% | 52% | 1.51 | 0.62 |
| SHEL Shell plc | 60% | 43% | 1.40 | 0.45 |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 142% | 114% | 1.24 | 1.31 |
| TTE TotalEnergies SE | 69% | 57% | 1.22 | 0.51 |
| E Eni S.p.A. | 79% | 69% | 1.15 | 0.70 |
| SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 90% | 90% | 1.00 | 0.96 |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 78% | 83% | 0.94 | 0.76 |
| BP BP p.l.c. | 58% | 62% | 0.94 | 0.51 |
| EC Ecopetrol S.A. | 127% | 139% | 0.91 | 1.13 |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 86% | 94% | 0.91 | 0.89 |
| BKR Baker Hughes Company | 127% | 160% | 0.79 | 1.37 |
| CVE Cenovus Energy Inc. | 124% | 173% | 0.72 | 1.69 |
| YPF YPF Sociedad Anónima | 144% | 206% | 0.70 | 1.58 |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 80% | 155% | 0.51 | 1.24 |
| HAL Halliburton Company | 113% | 225% | 0.50 | 1.75 |
| SLB Slb N.V. | 104% | 212% | 0.49 | 1.54 |
What diversifies PBR-A?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with PBR-A's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing PBR-A with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in PBR-A into SMH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+46.7% for PBR-A alone, +47.2% for the mix).
- CAH made money in eight of the ten calendar years in which PBR-A lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of PBR-A over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.40 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which PBR-A lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% PBR-A and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2020 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBR-A Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (this page) | 1.00 | +705% | 1.31 | −5.1% | −25.8% | −55.2% | −45.3% | −21.1% | −15.9% | −29.3% | −16.5% | −55.4% | −39.8% | 35.5% | +46.7% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.29 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | −9.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29.0% | +41.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.21 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +3.9% | +7.7% | +8.1% | +41.3% | +19.6% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | — | 29.0% | +43.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.40 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | −13.4% | −25.3% | +23.8% | +16.6% | — | — | — | — | — | 29.7% | +40.9% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.35 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | −6.5% | −0.3% | +12.6% | +23.8% | +9.6% | — | — | — | — | 29.5% | +40.1% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.06 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +55.5% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +33.4% | +8.6% | +6.8% | +19.0% | −44.7% | −47.0% | 29.6% | +47.2% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.14 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | +2.1% | +4.1% | +3.4% | +26.4% | +20.9% | — | — | — | — | 28.8% | +40.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.05 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | +24.8% | −10.7% | −2.2% | −28.3% | +6.6% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +4.9% | — | 28.4% | +42.2% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | -0.05 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +28.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.5% | +43.1% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2020 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBR-A Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (this page) | 1.00 | +705% | 1.31 | −5.1% | −25.8% | −55.2% | −45.3% | −21.1% | −15.9% | −29.3% | −16.5% | −55.4% | −39.8% | 35.5% | +46.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.21 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +10.1% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +66.0% | +3.8% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −39.6% | −8.3% | 29.9% | +46.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.09 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | −2.4% | −6.0% | +12.9% | +27.6% | +11.2% | −24.4% | +2.8% | −20.5% | −65.1% | 31.6% | +62.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.04 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +6.7% | +67.7% | −10.4% | +61.7% | +15.7% | −17.0% | +8.7% | −15.2% | −9.4% | 30.1% | +57.7% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.23 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +27.1% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +67.7% | +25.6% | +11.8% | +13.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | 29.9% | +45.7% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.44 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | −27.4% | +17.4% | +0.4% | +48.6% | +94.3% | — | — | — | — | 31.8% | +48.4% |
Common questions
What was PBR-A's worst drawdown?
PBR-A's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 96.0%, from May 2008 to January 2016. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were PBR-A's best and worst years?
Over 24 full calendar years, PBR-A's best year was 2016, when it returned 159%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -55.4%.
Is there a better investment than PBR-A?
Among PBR-A's popular alternatives, VLO was ahead of PBR-A in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, INSW (oil & gas) earned more than PBR-A over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 56.5% a year at 40.5% volatility, against 51.8% a year at 37.5%.
Is PBR-A more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. PBR-A's volatility over the past 5 years was 37.5%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PBR-A's return lands within 37.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is PBR-A's Sharpe ratio?
PBR-A's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.31, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PBR-A earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is PBR-A with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, PBR-A's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.18 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PBR-A instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PBR-A holding.
What are the best alternatives to PBR-A?
Of the 17 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed PBR-A in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: VLO.
Did PBR-A outperform the S&P 500?
PBR-A finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 24 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +6.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did PBR-A do in stock market crashes?
PBR-A fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when PBR-A fell 65.8% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies PBR-A?
These had a low correlation with PBR-A over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.29), DXJ (correlation 0.21) and EMLP (correlation 0.40); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.21), CLS (correlation 0.09) and FIX (correlation 0.04). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than PBR-A's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of PBR-A's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.