Relative Intelligence · Oilfield Services

How SLB compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SLB alone. It places SLB (Slb N.V.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SLB stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: SLB's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowThe slide is SLB's own: it is 41.6% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. Over the past 6 months, SLB fell 3.3% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?SLB rose 8.3% over the past 3 months, 5.7 points ahead of the oilfield services ETF OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF), which rose 2.6%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its oilfield services peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: WHD (Cactus) rose 16.7%, while FTI (TechnipFMC) fell 4.3%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsSLB has run far ahead of the market, rising 53.2% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. Even so, the last two calendar years both went the same way: SLB rose 3.3% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termSLB turned $10,000 into $7,870 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. SLB's 10-year loss of 21.3% puts it behind 87% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, SLB has typically fallen 1.8 times as far as the S&P 500. In the Covid crash, SLB fell 64.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than BKR (Baker Hughes, 55.2%) but less than HAL (Halliburton, 79.1%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, SLB has a correlation of 0.32 over 5 years, less closely than 66% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. SLB's link to the S&P 500 has loosened: a correlation of 0.32 over the past 5 years, down from 0.76 in the 5 years before. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- XOM (Exxonmobil), CVX (Chevron) and COP (ConocoPhillips) earned more than SLB with less volatility over the past 5 years. XOM returned 27.1% a year at 26.5% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 37.5%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- PSX (Phillips 66, oil & gas) and TTE (TotalEnergies, integrated oil & gas) earned more than SLB with less volatility over the past 5 years. PSX returned 33.2% a year at 32.9% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 37.5%.
- Whole market
- 694 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SLB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in SLB have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SLB over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SLB over the same span and SLB's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in SLB at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $21,770 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Seven of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SLB, and EOG finished highest, at $380,118.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 915 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SLB; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- EOG$380,118+3,701% total · +13.4% a year
- COP$156,444+1,464% total · +9.9% a year
- CVX$142,109+1,321% total · +9.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- XOM$124,235+1,142% total · +9.1% a year
- HP$84,217+742% total · +7.6% a year
- OII$82,944+729% total · +7.6% a year
- BKR$57,190+472% total · +6.2% a year
- SLB$21,770+118% total · +2.7% a year
- PTEN$12,257+22.6% total · +0.7% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,000 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SLB; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- FTI$92,034+820% total · +55.9% a year
- XOM$32,965+230% total · +26.9% a year
- OII$32,754+228% total · +26.8% a year
- BKR$24,898+149% total · +20.0% a year
- CVX$24,595+146% total · +19.7% a year
- COP$22,182+122% total · +17.3% a year
- EOG$21,734+117% total · +16.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- SLB$18,357+83.6% total · +12.9% a year
- HP$16,471+64.7% total · +10.5% a year
SLB at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- SLB is still 41.6% below its all-time high.
- SLB's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 87.8%, from June 2014 to March 2020. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over 29 full calendar years, SLB's best was 2022, when it returned 81.1%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 56.5%. It lost money in 12 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $74B
- Industry
- Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +53.2%total return
- Past 3 years
- −7.2%−2.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +60.7%+9.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- −21.3%−2.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +81.1%2022
- Worst calendar year
- −56.5%2008
- Losing years
- 12 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 37.5%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.44return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −87.8%Jun 2014 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −41.6%below the peak
SLB against the whole market
Where SLB ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does SLB rank among all stocks?
This section ranks SLB on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how SLB stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- SLB's 10-year return ranks in the bottom 13% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
- SLB's 1-year return ranks in the top 15% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | SLB | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +53.2% | 506 of 3,287 | top 15% |
| 3-year return | −7.2% | 2,437 of 3,017 | bottom 20% |
| 5-year return | +60.7% | 988 of 2,893 | top 34% |
| 10-year return | −21.3% | 1,919 of 2,202 | bottom 14% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 37.5% | 1,305 of 2,893 | top 45% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.44 | 1,109 of 2,893 | top 38% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −84.5% | 1,776 of 2,187 | bottom 20% |
What has beaten SLB on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). SLB sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than SLB with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 397 stocks and 297 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SLB over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 19% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half SLB's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 34% less than SLB's 37.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.44 for SLB. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than SLB (33.4% against 37.5%).
- Among SLB's popular alternatives, XOM, CVX and BKR are in the region. XOM earned 27.1% a year against 9.9% a year for SLB, at 26.5% volatility, 29% less than SLB's 37.5%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to SLB; faint dots are 88 more of the 694 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than SLB?
Investments that beat SLB over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among SLB's popular alternatives, XOM, CVX and COP earned more than SLB with less volatility over the past 5 years. XOM returned 27.1% a year at 26.5% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 37.5%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PSX (oil & gas) and TTE (integrated oil & gas) earned more than SLB with less volatility over the past 5 years. PSX returned 33.2% a year at 32.9% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 37.5%.
- Across the whole market, 694 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SLB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat SLB over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks SLB's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than SLB follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than SLB's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× SLB's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than SLB's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with SLB?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +9.9% | 37.5% | 0.44 | −84.5% | −21.3% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.32 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against SLB. 9 of 21 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.75 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.73 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.2% | 32.6% | 0.68 | −70.7% | +379% | 0.78 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.6% | 32.3% | 0.64 | −77.1% | +131% | 0.74 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.7% | 34.6% | 0.70 | −73.5% | +248% | 0.77 | — | ||
FTITechnipFMC plc · Oilfield Services | Higher return in most periods | +54.1% | 41.3% | 1.26 | −85.8% | +178% | 0.71 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Oilfield Services and Oil & Gas and the categories next to it (Integrated Oil & Gas, Exploration & Production, Oil & Gas Midstream), plus SLB's specific themes. 64 of 71 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.73 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | 0.65 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.0% | 28.7% | 0.66 | −63.9% | +141% | 0.61 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.61 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +10.8% | 21.9% | 0.58 | −41.6% | +160% | 0.35 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,876 of 3,542 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.14 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | -0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.07 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.33 | — | ||
VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.49 | 0.15% | |
PDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Broad Commodities | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +11.7% | 19.3% | 0.67 | −40.7% | +153% | 0.57 | 0.74% | |
STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +32.2% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | +1,018% | 0.47 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.17 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for SLB
- Annual return
- SLB returned 9.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $16,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- SLB's volatility over the past 5 years was 37.5%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SLB's return lands within 37.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- SLB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.44, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SLB earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- SLB's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 84.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 84.5% fall takes a 545% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, SLB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.32 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SLB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SLB holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 694 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than SLB with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with SLB | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.14 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | -0.01 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.07 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.33 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.38 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.30 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.40 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.33 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.41 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.39 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.18 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.37 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.16 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.23 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +12.7% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | +309% | 0.44 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +11.9% | 19.4% | 0.68 | −54.4% | +30.4% | 0.14 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.14 | — | |
| 18 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.16 | — |
| 19 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.29 | — |
| 20 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.29 | — |
| 21 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.40 | — |
| 22 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | 0.16 | — |
| 23 | SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +20.3% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +430% | 0.19 | — |
| 24 | RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated · Insurance | Whole market | +19.7% | 27.3% | 0.80 | −65.8% | +199% | 0.46 | — |
| 25 | EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.32 | — |
| 26 | Same or nearby category | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.73 | — | |
| 27 | Popular alternative | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.75 | — | |
| 28 | RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | +215% | 0.09 | — |
| 29 | Same or nearby category | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | 0.65 | — | |
| 30 | CACICACI International Inc · Business Services | Whole market | +16.6% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | +499% | 0.23 | — |
| 31 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.49 | 0.15% |
| 32 | Popular alternative | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.73 | — | |
| 33 | Same or nearby category | +16.0% | 28.7% | 0.66 | −63.9% | +141% | 0.61 | — | |
| 34 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.11 | — |
| 35 | AVTAvnet, Inc. · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +22.1% | 30.7% | 0.81 | −58.4% | +173% | 0.35 | — |
| 36 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | -0.02 | — |
| 37 | PDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Broad Commodities | Whole market | +11.7% | 19.3% | 0.67 | −40.7% | +153% | 0.57 | 0.74% |
| 38 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.15 | — | |
| 39 | HRBH&R Block, Inc. · Tax Preparation | Whole market | +18.3% | 34.9% | 0.65 | −57.7% | +206% | 0.14 | — |
| 40 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.26 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.27 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.46 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.12 | — | |
| 44 | IGPTInvesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF · Technology | Whole market | +14.3% | 30.1% | 0.60 | −50.1% | +525% | 0.09 | 0.57% |
| 45 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.03 | — | |
| 46 | NPKNational Presto Industries, Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 27.3% | 0.69 | −45.5% | +181% | 0.32 | — |
| 47 | Whole market | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | 0.36 | — | |
| 48 | DJPiPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return(SM) ETN · Commodities | Whole market | +11.2% | 18.9% | 0.66 | −38.4% | +120% | 0.58 | 0.70% |
| 49 | TRSTTrustCo Bank Corp NY · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.5% | 26.8% | 0.68 | −49.5% | +126% | 0.44 | — |
| 50 | FCBCFirst Community Bankshares, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.0% | 28.7% | 0.60 | −49.5% | +217% | 0.35 | — |
| 51 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.31 | — | |
| 52 | RCBCRiver City Bank · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.6% | 27.2% | 0.64 | −45.5% | +345% | 0.06 | — |
| 53 | QVALAlpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.7% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.5% | +230% | 0.57 | 0.28% |
| 54 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.32 | 0.03% | |
| 55 | BWFGBankwell Financial Group, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +20.1% | 28.5% | 0.79 | −64.7% | +240% | 0.25 | — |
| 56 | Whole market | +14.1% | 30.1% | 0.59 | −54.7% | +513% | 0.25 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.35 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.32 | 0.03% | |
| 59 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | 0.85 | 0.08% | |
| 60 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.39 | — |
| 61 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.10 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +12.0% | 25.4% | 0.58 | −55.2% | +240% | 0.58 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +14.8% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | +670% | 0.16 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +923% | 0.10 | — | |
| 65 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.56 | 0.80% |
| 66 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.10 | — | |
| 67 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.46 | — |
| 68 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.28 | — | |
| 69 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +13.3% | 23.8% | 0.65 | −49.7% | — | 0.20 | — |
| 70 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | -0.05 | — |
| 71 | WFWoori Financial Group Inc. · Banks | Whole market | +26.3% | 31.6% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +282% | 0.42 | — |
| 72 | Same or nearby category | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.61 | — | |
| 73 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.22 | — |
| 74 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.43 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.04 | — | |
| 76 | DRIDarden Restaurants, Inc. · Restaurants | Whole market | +12.4% | 27.2% | 0.57 | −72.8% | +361% | 0.31 | — |
| 77 | COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.7% | 0.70 | −38.7% | — | 0.70 | 0.49% |
| 78 | EWYiShares MSCI South Korea ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 34.0% | 0.61 | −49.7% | +230% | 0.30 | 0.59% |
| 79 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.08 | 0.18% | |
| 80 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.33 | — | |
| 81 | Same or nearby category | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | 0.62 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.17 | — | |
| 83 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | -0.02 | 0.58% |
| 84 | Same or nearby category | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | 0.65 | — | |
| 85 | Same or nearby category | +26.5% | 32.5% | 0.89 | −77.5% | +433% | 0.70 | — | |
| 86 | HSTHost Hotels & Resorts, Inc. · Hotel REITs | Whole market | +13.8% | 30.0% | 0.58 | −55.0% | +144% | 0.32 | — |
| 87 | Same or nearby category | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.62 | — | |
| 88 | PAGPenske Automotive Group, Inc. · Specialty Retail | Whole market | +18.3% | 31.9% | 0.69 | −60.0% | +528% | 0.32 | — |
| 89 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.02 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.58 | 0.03% | |
| 91 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.29 | — | |
| 92 | PSOPearson plc · Education Services | Whole market | +18.5% | 27.9% | 0.75 | −58.4% | +155% | 0.31 | — |
| 93 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.33 | — |
| 94 | Same or nearby category | +19.2% | 34.4% | 0.69 | −66.8% | +416% | 0.42 | — | |
| 95 | AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +18.8% | 31.9% | 0.70 | −78.5% | +185% | 0.22 | — |
| 96 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | 0.39 | — |
| 97 | TXTernium S.A. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +13.7% | 34.8% | 0.54 | −74.9% | +393% | 0.40 | — |
| 98 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.22 | — | |
| 99 | ACAArcosa, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +23.1% | 34.0% | 0.78 | −36.8% | — | 0.25 | — |
| 100 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.17 | 0.40% |
SLB against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against SLB, compared period by period and year by year.
How do SLB's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at SLB, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- 12 of the 21 popular alternatives earned less than SLB over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Five of the 21 popular alternatives, led by XOM, BKR and CVX, were both more rewarding and calmer than SLB over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, SLB returned 10.0% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (37.5% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than SLB with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| FTI TechnipFMC plc | +54.1% | 41.3% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | +27.1% | 26.5% |
| WFRD Weatherford International plc | +24.2% | 50.1% |
| OII Oceaneering International, Inc. | +23.2% | 50.2% |
| BKR Baker Hughes Company | +19.8% | 34.6% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | +19.5% | 25.2% |
| COP ConocoPhillips | +18.2% | 32.6% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | +16.6% | 32.3% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| DNOW Dnow Inc. | +10.9% | 42.7% |
| SLB This pageSlb N.V. | +10.0% | 37.5% |
| WHD Cactus, Inc. | +7.9% | 44.8% |
| PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. | +7.6% | 54.6% |
| RIG Transocean Ltd. | +7.3% | 60.7% |
| HAL Halliburton Company | +6.9% | 39.4% |
| NOV NOV Inc. | +6.2% | 41.4% |
| HP Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | +5.9% | 48.7% |
| RES RPC, Inc. | +4.7% | 51.1% |
| OIS Oil States International, Inc. | +3.6% | 58.4% |
| LBRT Liberty Energy Inc. | +2.8% | 55.2% |
| PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. | −5.8% | 61.8% |
| NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. | −8.7% | 65.3% |
| CLB Core Laboratories N.V. | −19.2% | 53.5% |
Has SLB consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares SLB with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than SLB helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Eight of the 21 popular alternatives, led by COP, XOM and CVX, outperformed SLB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- COP, XOM and CVX outperformed SLB in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- XOM, CVX and BKR earned more for the risk they took than SLB (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than SLB over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| SLB Slb N.V. (this page) | — | −3.4% | +8.3% | −3.3% | +26.4% | +53.2% | −7.2% | +60.7% | −21.3% | 37.5% | 0.44 | −84.5% | — | $74B | — |
| COP QualifiedConocoPhillips | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +14.4% | +27.0% | +27.1% | +54.3% | +72.9% | +28.5% | +131% | +379% | 32.6% | 0.68 | −70.7% | — | $175B | — |
| XOM QualifiedExxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +12.4% | +20.7% | +22.0% | +47.9% | +62.4% | +76.7% | +232% | +214% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | — | $731B | — |
| CVX QualifiedChevron Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +10.8% | +20.0% | +25.4% | +48.8% | +51.9% | +53.4% | +144% | +238% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | — | $446B | — |
| EOG QualifiedEOG Resources, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +12.4% | +12.7% | +24.0% | +51.9% | +53.1% | +31.9% | +115% | +131% | 32.3% | 0.64 | −77.1% | — | $83B | — |
| FTI QualifiedTechnipFMC plc | 3/5 short3/3 long | −3.3% | −4.3% | −1.7% | +46.0% | +89.4% | +241% | +769% | +178% | 41.3% | 1.26 | −85.8% | — | $27B | — |
| OII QualifiedOceaneering International, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −4.0% | +2.9% | +18.8% | +77.3% | +87.1% | +76.8% | +184% | +66.9% | 50.2% | 0.67 | −93.3% | — | $4.4B | — |
| HP QualifiedHelmerich & Payne, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −5.2% | +14.0% | +14.8% | +30.0% | +66.7% | +1.9% | +33.1% | −8.6% | 48.7% | 0.36 | −81.9% | — | $3.8B | — |
| DNOW QualifiedDnow Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +1.3% | +13.0% | +31.4% | +18.0% | +10.3% | +38.5% | +67.4% | −28.1% | 42.7% | 0.46 | −82.5% | — | $2.9B | — |
| BKR Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesBaker Hughes Company | 0/5 short3/3 long | −3.8% | +1.3% | −5.3% | +19.3% | +22.1% | +70.1% | +146% | +248% | 34.6% | 0.70 | −73.5% | — | $55B | — |
| PTEN Oil & Gas DrillingPatterson-UTI Energy, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +1.8% | +16.1% | +21.1% | +84.9% | +110% | −4.2% | +44.3% | −40.4% | 54.6% | 0.41 | −94.0% | — | $4.4B | — |
| WHD Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesCactus, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −7.4% | +16.7% | +19.5% | +33.7% | +69.4% | +28.0% | +46.0% | — | 44.8% | 0.39 | −79.1% | — | $4.4B | — |
| HAL Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesHalliburton Company | 1/5 short1/3 long | +0.6% | −3.9% | −7.6% | +15.0% | +51.5% | −14.7% | +39.8% | −17.1% | 39.4% | 0.37 | −91.5% | — | $28B | — |
| NOV Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesNOV Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −5.9% | −2.6% | +0.4% | +17.6% | +51.9% | +1.8% | +35.1% | −42.2% | 41.4% | 0.35 | −83.3% | — | $6.8B | — |
| OIS Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil States International, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −0.2% | +0.5% | −16.1% | +17.3% | +39.6% | +8.8% | +19.6% | −73.8% | 58.4% | 0.35 | −96.0% | — | $500M | — |
| WFRD Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesWeatherford International plc | 0/5 short1/3 long | −3.5% | +1.8% | −20.3% | −1.1% | +23.7% | −12.0% | +195% | — | 50.1% | 0.69 | −95.5% | — | $5.7B | — |
| RIG Oil & Gas DrillingTransocean Ltd. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +6.8% | +15.9% | −1.2% | +37.3% | +76.9% | −18.7% | +42.0% | −45.0% | 60.7% | 0.42 | −95.8% | — | $6.5B | — |
| NBR Oil & Gas DrillingNabors Industries Ltd. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.7% | −3.1% | +1.0% | +44.4% | +95.1% | −32.7% | −36.4% | −86.6% | 65.3% | 0.19 | −98.8% | — | $1.2B | — |
| RES Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesRPC, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +10.2% | +7.7% | −8.1% | +15.7% | +43.6% | −23.8% | +25.7% | −60.8% | 51.1% | 0.34 | −92.3% | — | $1.4B | — |
| CLB Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesCore Laboratories N.V. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.0% | −10.0% | −38.3% | −40.5% | −14.8% | −56.2% | −65.6% | −89.5% | 53.5% | -0.14 | −93.5% | — | $462M | — |
| LBRT Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesLiberty Energy Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.0% | −30.8% | −37.1% | −11.2% | +6.2% | −15.7% | +14.7% | — | 55.2% | 0.33 | −90.0% | — | $2.7B | — |
| PUMP Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesProPetro Holding Corp. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −24.9% | −40.9% | −45.1% | −22.3% | +31.8% | −28.6% | −25.6% | — | 61.8% | 0.20 | −93.9% | — | $937M | — |
How did SLB do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where SLB ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with SLB and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- SLB finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, WFRD came out ahead of SLB most often, in four of the six years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SLB finished in the top quarter in three of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 22.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of SLB; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places SLB among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of SLB | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLB This pageSlb N.V. | — | +3.3% | −24.5% | −0.8% | +81.1% | +39.6% | −43.8% | +17.8% | −44.7% | −18.5% | +23.5% | −16.3% | −3.6% | +32.1% | +3.0% | −17.2% | +30.0% | +56.2% | −56.5% | +57.1% | +31.1% | +46.6% | +23.8% | +32.0% | −22.2% | −30.3% | +43.9% | +34.9% | −41.6% | +63.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 29 | 10 of 22 | 17 of 22 | 8 of 22 | 8 of 22 | 10 of 22 | 13 of 22 | 5 of 21 | 15 of 19 | 13 of 18 | 11 of 18 | 8 of 18 | 4 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 15 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 13 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 11 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 10 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 5 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 7 of 15 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 14 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 16 of 29 | −2.3% | −12.2% | +2.0% | +72.2% | +87.1% | −36.0% | +6.6% | +15.6% | +11.9% | +10.1% | −29.0% | +1.5% | +27.1% | +8.0% | +11.0% | +38.6% | +2.8% | −39.9% | +25.4% | +26.5% | +36.9% | +35.6% | +39.8% | −17.5% | +8.6% | +24.2% | +13.6% | −9.8% | +13.1% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 16 of 29 | +16.0% | +11.3% | −6.3% | +87.4% | +57.6% | −36.2% | +7.2% | −15.1% | −3.8% | +19.9% | −12.8% | −6.0% | +20.1% | +4.7% | +18.7% | +10.1% | −12.6% | −13.1% | +24.3% | +39.1% | +11.8% | +28.1% | +20.7% | −8.9% | −7.5% | +10.2% | +12.7% | +22.5% | +28.3% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 15 of 29 | +10.1% | +1.3% | −13.6% | +58.5% | +46.2% | −25.9% | +15.3% | −9.7% | +10.6% | +36.7% | −16.2% | −7.0% | +19.3% | +5.1% | +20.3% | +22.9% | +8.1% | −18.3% | +30.5% | +33.7% | +11.5% | +25.6% | +35.4% | −23.2% | +9.4% | +0.6% | +7.2% | +11.1% | +22.1% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 17 of 29 | −11.4% | +4.3% | −2.0% | +56.9% | +88.6% | −38.6% | −2.8% | −18.7% | +7.5% | +44.0% | −22.5% | +10.3% | +39.7% | +23.4% | +8.5% | −5.5% | +47.4% | −25.0% | +43.6% | −14.6% | +106% | +55.3% | +16.1% | +2.5% | −28.1% | +212% | +2.5% | −18.0% | −15.5% |
| FTI TechnipFMC plc | 13 of 24 | +54.9% | +44.7% | +66.0% | +106% | −23.2% | −55.3% | +11.9% | −36.4% | −11.5% | +22.4% | −38.0% | −10.3% | +21.9% | −18.0% | +17.5% | +53.8% | +143% | −55.7% | +84.0% | +43.6% | +33.1% | +38.4% | +13.9% | +24.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| OII Oceaneering International, Inc. | 15 of 29 | −7.9% | +22.6% | +21.7% | +54.6% | +42.3% | −46.7% | +23.2% | −42.8% | −23.7% | −22.2% | −34.7% | −24.3% | +48.3% | +18.1% | +26.5% | +25.8% | +101% | −56.7% | +69.6% | +59.6% | +33.3% | +33.3% | +13.2% | +11.9% | +13.7% | +30.3% | −0.3% | −24.1% | +24.2% |
| HP Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −6.3% | −7.8% | −23.2% | +115% | +6.3% | −44.3% | +0.5% | −22.6% | −12.2% | +51.7% | −17.2% | −17.5% | +52.9% | −3.5% | +20.9% | +22.2% | +76.4% | −42.9% | +64.7% | −20.5% | +83.2% | +23.7% | +1.1% | +82.6% | −23.2% | +104% | +13.7% | −41.6% | +31.6% |
| DNOW Dnow Inc. | 4 of 11 | +1.8% | +14.9% | −10.9% | +48.7% | +18.9% | −36.1% | −3.4% | +5.5% | −46.1% | +29.4% | −38.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BKR Baker Hughes Company | 16 of 29 | +13.4% | +23.2% | +18.6% | +26.0% | +19.0% | −15.2% | +23.0% | −30.4% | +25.1% | +43.7% | −16.3% | +3.0% | +37.8% | −14.4% | −13.9% | +43.8% | +29.0% | −59.9% | +9.6% | +24.0% | +44.3% | +35.2% | +2.0% | −9.8% | −10.7% | +102% | +22.7% | −58.8% | +28.7% |
| PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. | 15 of 29 | −21.9% | −21.1% | −34.2% | +102% | +62.4% | −48.9% | +3.1% | −54.6% | −14.2% | +79.9% | −6.9% | −33.5% | +37.1% | −5.5% | −6.6% | +42.1% | +35.4% | −39.0% | −14.3% | −28.7% | +70.3% | +18.5% | +9.2% | +29.3% | −37.4% | +186% | +221% | −79.0% | +200% |
| WHD Cactus, Inc. | 4 of 7 | −20.8% | +29.7% | −8.7% | +33.0% | +47.8% | −22.8% | +25.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HAL Halliburton Company | 17 of 29 | +7.0% | −23.2% | −6.5% | +74.5% | +22.0% | −21.2% | −4.9% | −44.6% | −8.9% | +61.7% | −11.9% | −21.6% | +47.9% | +1.6% | −14.8% | +37.3% | +68.3% | −51.5% | +23.3% | +1.1% | +59.4% | +53.4% | +42.1% | +47.2% | −63.3% | −8.9% | +37.7% | −42.1% | +74.5% |
| NOV NOV Inc. | 13 of 29 | +11.2% | −26.8% | −1.8% | +55.7% | −0.8% | −44.9% | −1.7% | −28.3% | −3.3% | +13.9% | −46.7% | −9.3% | +17.8% | +1.2% | +1.7% | +53.9% | +85.0% | −66.7% | +140% | −2.4% | +77.8% | +57.7% | +2.5% | +6.0% | −46.7% | +147% | +40.2% | −67.3% | +122% |
| OIS Oil States International, Inc. | 11 of 24 | +33.8% | −25.5% | −9.0% | +50.1% | −1.0% | −69.2% | +14.2% | −49.5% | −27.4% | +43.1% | −44.3% | −15.9% | +42.2% | −6.3% | +19.2% | +63.1% | +110% | −45.2% | +5.9% | +1.8% | +64.3% | +38.3% | +89.3% | +41.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| WFRD Weatherford International plc | 4 of 6 | +11.1% | −26.4% | +92.1% | +83.7% | +362% | −78.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RIG Transocean Ltd. | 8 of 29 | +10.1% | −40.9% | +39.3% | +65.2% | +19.5% | −66.4% | −0.9% | −35.0% | −27.5% | +19.1% | −28.3% | −60.0% | +14.4% | +18.2% | −42.3% | −16.1% | +75.3% | −67.0% | +50.7% | +16.1% | +64.4% | +76.5% | +3.5% | −31.3% | −26.2% | +36.9% | +26.3% | −44.2% | +54.4% |
| NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. | 7 of 29 | −5.0% | −30.0% | −47.3% | +91.0% | +39.3% | −58.6% | +45.3% | −69.3% | −57.8% | +96.9% | −33.1% | −22.8% | +18.8% | −16.7% | −26.1% | +7.2% | +82.9% | −56.3% | −8.0% | −21.4% | +47.7% | +23.6% | +17.7% | +2.7% | −42.0% | +91.2% | +129% | −57.3% | +64.3% |
| RES RPC, Inc. | 18 of 29 | −5.7% | −16.3% | −16.4% | +96.4% | +44.2% | −39.9% | −46.1% | −60.2% | +29.9% | +66.3% | −7.3% | −25.3% | +49.6% | +5.3% | +2.5% | +164% | +9.2% | −14.8% | −29.5% | −3.1% | +137% | +131% | −4.4% | −33.3% | +117% | +158% | −20.0% | −36.6% | +65.9% |
| CLB Core Laboratories N.V. | 16 of 29 | −7.1% | −1.8% | −12.7% | −9.0% | −15.8% | −29.1% | −34.3% | −44.5% | −6.8% | +12.6% | −7.8% | −36.2% | +76.3% | −3.1% | +29.3% | +52.5% | +100% | −51.5% | +54.0% | +117% | +60.0% | +39.9% | +47.1% | −19.1% | −48.6% | +36.6% | +4.5% | +5.9% | +115% |
| LBRT Liberty Energy Inc. | 3 of 7 | −5.0% | +11.3% | +14.8% | +65.7% | −5.9% | −6.5% | −12.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. | 3 of 8 | +1.9% | +11.3% | −19.2% | +28.0% | +9.6% | −34.3% | −8.7% | −38.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How SLB has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were SLB's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents SLB's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of SLB's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: SLB fell 87.8% from June 2014 to March 2020, while the S&P 500 rose 36.7%.
- The slowest recovery came after SLB fell 68.0% from October 2007 to February 2009; it did not regain that peak until May 2014, five years later.
Green means SLB fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | SLB fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −87.8% | +36.7% | Jun 2014 | Mar 2020 | 5.8 years | Not yet | — |
| 2008 financial crisis | −68.0% | −50.0% | Oct 2007 | Feb 2009 | 16 months | May 2014 | 5.3 years |
| Dot-com bust | −59.8% | −47.0% | Aug 2000 | Oct 2002 | 2.2 years | Jul 2005 | 2.8 years |
| No named crash | −55.6% | +27.2% | Nov 1997 | Dec 1998 | 13 months | May 2000 | 17 months |
| No named crash | −42.5% | — | Aug 1987 | Dec 1987 | 4 months | Dec 1989 | 2 years |
How did SLB do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far SLB, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- SLB fell further than the S&P 500 in all ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when SLB fell 64.9% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, XOM held up best, falling less than SLB in all ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than SLB.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLB This pageSlb N.V. | — | −8.8% | −36.8% | −64.9% | −43.6% | −10.9% | −27.1% | −38.9% | −3.8% | −68.0% | −59.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 9 of 10 | −6.1% | −33.0% | −61.8% | −28.3% | −9.4% | −43.4% | −19.0% | −0.8% | −62.4% | −31.7% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 10 of 10 | −3.1% | −20.5% | −47.9% | −23.6% | −10.0% | −15.0% | −19.6% | −0.3% | −33.7% | −33.6% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 10 of 10 | −2.6% | −24.9% | −51.0% | −19.6% | −5.3% | −18.5% | −17.2% | −0.1% | −43.8% | −29.5% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −7.4% | −33.4% | −61.5% | −37.3% | −11.3% | −31.7% | −35.8% | −1.5% | −68.0% | −52.7% |
| FTI TechnipFMC plc | 2 of 9 | −9.6% | −36.7% | −70.9% | −42.7% | −10.9% | −35.8% | −22.2% | −4.0% | −73.5% | — |
| OII Oceaneering International, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −15.1% | −58.0% | −84.7% | −61.2% | −12.5% | −43.4% | −24.9% | −1.7% | −76.8% | −46.9% |
| HP Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −12.9% | −33.7% | −71.9% | −37.7% | −8.3% | −30.4% | −48.4% | −4.5% | −76.4% | −59.3% |
| DNOW Dnow Inc. | 3 of 6 | −10.4% | −29.4% | −55.1% | −39.0% | −14.2% | −34.6% | — | — | — | — |
| BKR Baker Hughes Company | 3 of 10 | −10.5% | −46.5% | −55.2% | −39.0% | −14.6% | −33.1% | −44.2% | −3.4% | −73.2% | −47.8% |
| PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −12.3% | −44.9% | −72.3% | −46.0% | −21.7% | −35.7% | −53.0% | −3.2% | −78.3% | −71.1% |
| WHD Cactus, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −13.8% | −43.4% | −71.0% | −37.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HAL Halliburton Company | 1 of 10 | −10.2% | −45.5% | −79.1% | −40.0% | −10.5% | −32.7% | −49.8% | −4.3% | −75.0% | −82.8% |
| NOV NOV Inc. | 3 of 10 | −14.8% | −35.5% | −64.0% | −46.2% | −8.5% | −36.3% | −39.6% | −4.7% | −80.5% | −68.2% |
| OIS Oil States International, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −19.1% | −58.4% | −85.0% | −60.1% | −11.1% | −31.7% | −45.1% | −3.0% | −81.8% | — |
| WFRD Weatherford International plc | 0 of 3 | −15.1% | −55.2% | −80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RIG Transocean Ltd. | 2 of 10 | −11.3% | −53.1% | −75.9% | −55.3% | −11.1% | −49.3% | −28.3% | −2.4% | −73.8% | −70.4% |
| NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. | 1 of 10 | −13.5% | −52.8% | −86.0% | −70.5% | −14.5% | −54.4% | −57.4% | −2.2% | −82.9% | −70.2% |
| RES RPC, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −12.9% | −53.5% | −54.5% | −43.0% | −12.5% | −31.5% | −43.7% | −6.1% | −71.3% | −49.7% |
| CLB Core Laboratories N.V. | 4 of 10 | −13.2% | −61.9% | −75.6% | −52.5% | −7.8% | −27.6% | −24.8% | −1.6% | −65.4% | −74.2% |
| LBRT Liberty Energy Inc. | 0 of 5 | −14.5% | −40.1% | −71.1% | −43.5% | −11.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. | 1 of 5 | −13.6% | −54.7% | −86.0% | −40.4% | −13.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does SLB move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares SLB with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Nine of the 17 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SLB's 0.49, led by COP, XOM and CVX.
- COP took just 92% of the S&P 500's losses, against 212% for SLB, while still keeping 94% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, SLB captured 104% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 212% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.54. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than SLB's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLB This pageSlb N.V. | 104% | 212% | 0.49 | 1.54 |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 94% | 92% | 1.02 | 0.91 |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 78% | 83% | 0.94 | 0.76 |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 86% | 94% | 0.91 | 0.89 |
| FTI TechnipFMC plc | 109% | 137% | 0.80 | 1.45 |
| BKR Baker Hughes Company | 127% | 160% | 0.79 | 1.37 |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 92% | 135% | 0.69 | 1.17 |
| OII Oceaneering International, Inc. | 162% | 272% | 0.60 | 2.29 |
| HP Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 108% | 214% | 0.50 | 1.43 |
| HAL Halliburton Company | 113% | 225% | 0.50 | 1.75 |
| PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. | 113% | 248% | 0.46 | 1.89 |
| RIG Transocean Ltd. | 149% | 322% | 0.46 | 2.44 |
| DNOW Dnow Inc. | 75% | 168% | 0.45 | 1.43 |
| NOV NOV Inc. | 96% | 220% | 0.44 | 1.59 |
| OIS Oil States International, Inc. | 134% | 338% | 0.40 | 2.46 |
| NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. | 125% | 357% | 0.35 | 2.28 |
| RES RPC, Inc. | 56% | 172% | 0.33 | 1.38 |
| CLB Core Laboratories N.V. | 95% | 329% | 0.29 | 2.14 |
What diversifies SLB?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with SLB's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing SLB with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in SLB into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+12.9% for SLB alone, +15.4% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and SMH have moved largely independently of SLB over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in eight of the 12 calendar years in which SLB lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which SLB lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% SLB and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2023 | 2020 | 2018 | 2017 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLB Slb N.V. (this page) | 1.00 | +60.7% | 0.44 | −24.5% | −0.8% | −43.8% | −44.7% | −18.5% | −16.3% | −3.6% | −17.2% | −56.5% | −22.2% | −30.3% | −41.6% | 41.0% | +12.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.49 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +17.4% | −9.0% | −5.2% | +10.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.7% | +14.8% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.28 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +42.0% | +3.9% | −19.8% | +22.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | 33.6% | +16.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.04 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +73.4% | +55.5% | −9.1% | +38.5% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +6.8% | −44.7% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 33.8% | +19.8% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.35 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | +20.1% | +2.1% | −9.5% | +16.7% | +4.1% | +3.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 33.6% | +14.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.17 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | +12.7% | +24.8% | −1.9% | +12.8% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +4.9% | — | — | — | 33.5% | +15.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.22 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +17.6% | +28.2% | −0.9% | +27.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.9% | +16.1% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.49 | +109% | 0.90 | +7.2% | +14.2% | −0.2% | −11.1% | +21.9% | −4.1% | +12.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 35.0% | +14.8% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.10 | +153% | 0.89 | +16.1% | +29.0% | +31.5% | −9.9% | +26.9% | −12.9% | +7.0% | −21.8% | −45.3% | −24.4% | +2.1% | — | 33.7% | +16.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2023 | 2020 | 2018 | 2017 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLB Slb N.V. (this page) | 1.00 | +60.7% | 0.44 | −24.5% | −0.8% | −43.8% | −44.7% | −18.5% | −16.3% | −3.6% | −17.2% | −56.5% | −22.2% | −30.3% | −41.6% | 41.0% | +12.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.14 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +34.1% | +10.1% | −24.5% | −12.7% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +51.7% | 33.9% | +19.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.18 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +160% | −2.4% | −16.3% | −11.6% | −6.0% | +12.9% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −25.6% | — | 36.7% | +32.0% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.15 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +79.6% | +6.7% | +0.8% | +32.1% | +67.7% | −10.4% | −17.0% | −15.2% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −9.5% | 35.3% | +28.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.27 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +24.1% | +27.1% | −28.4% | +12.0% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +46.9% | 34.5% | +18.5% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.19 | +594% | 1.36 | +103% | +37.8% | −7.2% | −37.5% | +48.4% | −36.3% | +50.9% | −42.9% | −67.4% | −33.1% | +9.8% | +7.0% | 34.7% | +21.4% |
Common questions
What was SLB's worst drawdown?
SLB's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 87.8%, from June 2014 to March 2020. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
What were SLB's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, SLB's best year was 2022, when it returned 81.1%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -56.5%.
Is there a better investment than SLB?
Among SLB's popular alternatives, XOM, CVX and COP earned more than SLB with less volatility over the past 5 years. XOM returned 27.1% a year at 26.5% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 37.5%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PSX (oil & gas) and TTE (integrated oil & gas) earned more than SLB with less volatility over the past 5 years. PSX returned 33.2% a year at 32.9% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 37.5%.
Is SLB more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. SLB's volatility over the past 5 years was 37.5%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SLB's return lands within 37.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is SLB's Sharpe ratio?
SLB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.44, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SLB earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is SLB with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, SLB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.32 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SLB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SLB holding.
What are the best alternatives to SLB?
Of the 21 popular alternatives we compared, eight outperformed SLB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: COP, XOM and CVX.
Did SLB outperform the S&P 500?
SLB finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +3.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did SLB do in stock market crashes?
SLB fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in ten. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when SLB fell 64.9% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies SLB?
These had a low correlation with SLB over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.49), DXJ (correlation 0.28) and SMH (correlation 0.04); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.14), CLS (correlation 0.18) and FIX (correlation 0.15). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than SLB's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of SLB's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.