Relative Intelligence · Industrial Machinery

How Caterpillar (CAT) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CAT alone. It places CAT (Caterpillar Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CAT stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CAT's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, CAT fell 15.9% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. CAT is 31.6% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is CAT's own: it fell 15.9% over the past 3 months while the industrial machinery ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 6.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its industrial machinery peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies) rose 10.1%, while TRN (Trinity Industries) fell 31.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsCAT has run far ahead of the market, rising 37.7% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (203% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termCAT turned $10,000 into $104,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. CAT's 10-year return of 936% puts it ahead of 95% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, CAT has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, CAT has a correlation of 0.65 over 5 years, more closely than 96% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- ESLT (Elbit Systems, aerospace & defense) earned more for the risk it took than CAT over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 35.4%, against 43.4% for CAT.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CAT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them HSBC, MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group) and MCK (McKesson).
How much would $10,000 in CAT have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CAT over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CAT over the same span and CAT's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in CAT at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $615,591 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CAT, and AAPL finished highest, at $20,534,853.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 72 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CAT; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- ESLT$2M+16,428% total · +19.3% a year
- OSK$650,601+6,406% total · +15.5% a year
- MU$629,766+6,198% total · +15.4% a year
- CAT$615,591+6,056% total · +15.3% a year
- WAB$275,358+2,654% total · +12.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- FCX$86,132+761% total · +7.7% a year
- MTW$45,662+357% total · +5.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 152 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CAT; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- HWM$73,554+636% total · +49.0% a year
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- MOG-A$52,115+421% total · +39.1% a year
- GE$49,841+398% total · +37.9% a year
- ESLT$49,131+391% total · +37.5% a year
- CAT$46,130+361% total · +35.8% a year
- WAB$34,242+242% total · +27.9% a year
- URI$29,622+196% total · +24.3% a year
- FCX$23,053+131% total · +18.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
CAT at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- CAT is still 31.6% below its all-time high.
- CAT's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 73.4%, from July 2007 to March 2009. It took 18 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, CAT's best was 2003, when it returned 86.1%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 36.8%. It lost money in six of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $333B
- Industry
- Agricultural - Machinery
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +37.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +203%+44.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +288%+31.1% a year
- Past 10 years
- +936%+26.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +86.1%2003
- Worst calendar year
- −36.8%2008
- Losing years
- 6 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 31.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.01return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −73.4%Jul 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −31.6%below the peak
CAT against the whole market
Where CAT ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CAT rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CAT on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CAT stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), CAT ranks in the top 3% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CAT | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +37.7% | 785 of 3,287 | top 24% |
| 3-year return | +203% | 398 of 3,017 | top 13% |
| 5-year return | +288% | 185 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| 10-year return | +936% | 120 of 2,202 | top 5% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 31.9% | 899 of 2,893 | top 31% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.01 | 93 of 2,893 | top 3% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −43.4% | 239 of 2,187 | top 11% |
What has beaten CAT on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CAT sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CAT with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Five stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CAT over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half CAT's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 22% less than CAT's 31.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 1.01 for CAT.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CAT; faint dots are 3 more of the 5 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than CAT?
Investments that beat CAT over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ESLT (aerospace & defense) earned more for the risk it took than CAT over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 35.4%, against 43.4% for CAT.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CAT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them HSBC, MUFG and MCK.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CAT over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CAT's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than CAT follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CAT's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CAT's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CAT's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with CAT?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.65 | 0.09% | |||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 5 shownEverything else in Industrial Machinery and the categories next to it (Infrastructure, Electrical Equipment, Aerospace & Defense, Industrial Distribution), plus CAT's specific themes. 5 of 100 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.02 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.54 | — | ||
MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.55 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatility | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.46 | — | ||
EMBJEmbraer S.A. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return in most periods | +32.8% | 45.0% | 0.86 | −85.2% | +283% | 0.39 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 50 of 3,513 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.15 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.15 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.36 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.38 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.27 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.59 | 0.35% | ||
PSIInvesco Semiconductors ETF · Technology | Higher return in most periods | +24.3% | 41.6% | 0.73 | −44.9% | +1,134% | 0.67 | 0.55% | |
What these numbers mean for CAT
- Annual return
- CAT returned 31.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $38,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CAT's volatility over the past 5 years was 31.9%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CAT's return lands within 31.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CAT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.01, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CAT earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CAT's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 43.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 43.4% fall takes a 76.6% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CAT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.65 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CAT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CAT holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 5 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than CAT with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with CAT | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.15 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.38 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.21 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.26 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.20 | — |
CAT against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CAT, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CAT's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CAT, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than CAT over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 13 of the 20 popular alternatives earned less than CAT over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, CAT returned 31.1% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (31.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CAT with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| CAT This pageCaterpillar Inc. | +31.1% | 31.9% |
| WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | +25.6% | 26.2% |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | +24.3% | 39.1% |
| CMI Cummins Inc. | +19.9% | 29.0% |
| PCAR PACCAR Inc | +17.9% | 26.1% |
| DE Deere & Company | +14.4% | 29.9% |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | +13.7% | 44.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | +8.0% | 26.6% |
| MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | +6.5% | 27.1% |
| OSK Oshkosh Corp | +6.4% | 34.7% |
| TEX Terex Corporation | +4.0% | 44.3% |
| MTW The Manitowoc Company, Inc. | +1.6% | 51.1% |
| ALG Alamo Group Inc. | +0.9% | 29.6% |
| TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | +0.5% | 35.7% |
| AGCO AGCO Corporation | −1.6% | 35.8% |
| GBX The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | −2.0% | 42.2% |
| WNC Wabash National Corporation | −2.6% | 49.0% |
| ASTE Astec Industries, Inc. | −4.6% | 42.7% |
| CNH CNH Industrial N.V. | −5.4% | 37.4% |
| HRI Herc Holdings Inc. | −6.0% | 52.4% |
| LNN Lindsay Corporation | −6.7% | 32.8% |
Has CAT consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CAT with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CAT helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives outperformed CAT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was URI.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CAT over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. (this page) | — | −11.2% | −15.9% | −8.8% | +22.2% | +37.7% | +203% | +288% | +936% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | — | $333B | — |
| URI Rental & Leasing ServicesUnited Rentals, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +1.4% | +3.3% | +29.0% | +24.3% | +5.2% | +164% | +196% | +1,270% | 39.1% | 0.75 | −63.3% | — | $65B | — |
| FCX CopperFreeport-McMoRan Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | −4.3% | +17.4% | −1.4% | +33.9% | +64.8% | +111% | +89.6% | +650% | 44.9% | 0.51 | −72.6% | — | $99B | — |
| WAB RailroadsWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 5/5 short0/3 long | +0.1% | +10.1% | +7.6% | +31.6% | +45.3% | +189% | +212% | +264% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | — | $48B | — |
| MTW Industrial - MachineryThe Manitowoc Company, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | −2.4% | +73.7% | +72.4% | +82.0% | +98.2% | +69.4% | +8.4% | +28.0% | 51.1% | 0.28 | −83.4% | — | $801M | — |
| WNC Agricultural - MachineryWabash National Corporation | 5/5 short0/3 long | +8.6% | −3.5% | +34.9% | +46.7% | +45.3% | −34.4% | −12.4% | +15.8% | 49.0% | 0.19 | −76.4% | — | $519M | — |
| DE Agricultural - MachineryDeere & Company | 4/5 short0/3 long | −7.5% | +8.1% | +6.9% | +36.5% | +38.3% | +75.4% | +96.1% | +755% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | — | $170B | — |
| CNH Agricultural - MachineryCNH Industrial N.V. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −14.4% | +11.7% | +7.4% | +24.6% | +10.9% | +10.3% | −24.3% | +78.9% | 37.4% | 0.04 | −65.8% | — | $14B | — |
| LNN Agricultural - MachineryLindsay Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | −7.1% | −5.1% | −0.6% | −11.0% | −16.2% | −4.3% | −29.2% | +56.3% | 32.8% | -0.05 | −41.1% | — | $1.1B | — |
| HRI Rental & Leasing ServicesHerc Holdings Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −10.9% | −14.5% | +13.9% | −16.5% | −0.4% | +23.5% | −26.7% | +365% | 52.4% | 0.14 | −82.2% | — | $4.2B | — |
| PCAR Industrial - MachineryPACCAR Inc | 2/5 short0/3 long | −4.1% | −11.2% | −13.7% | −0.5% | +15.7% | +50.2% | +128% | +314% | 26.1% | 0.76 | −37.9% | — | $58B | — |
| MLM Construction MaterialsMartin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +1.6% | −8.2% | −18.8% | −19.7% | −18.6% | +26.0% | +37.1% | +206% | 27.1% | 0.37 | −48.3% | — | $30B | — |
| OSK Agricultural - MachineryOshkosh Corp | 2/5 short0/3 long | −7.3% | −6.1% | −11.7% | +1.7% | +0.1% | +57.3% | +36.2% | +192% | 34.7% | 0.35 | −48.7% | — | $8.2B | — |
| VMC Construction MaterialsVulcan Materials Company | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.4% | −6.5% | −10.8% | −10.0% | −10.7% | +32.9% | +46.8% | +159% | 26.6% | 0.42 | −49.2% | — | $34B | — |
| ALG Industrial - MachineryAlamo Group Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −9.5% | −6.8% | −13.5% | −11.9% | −18.1% | −7.4% | +4.3% | +141% | 29.6% | 0.18 | −42.5% | — | $1.8B | — |
| CMI Industrial - MachineryCummins Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +0.3% | −15.8% | −15.2% | +3.8% | +31.4% | +160% | +148% | +444% | 29.0% | 0.77 | −44.0% | — | $74B | — |
| AGCO Agricultural - MachineryAGCO Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −12.7% | −6.6% | −12.5% | −0.4% | −2.0% | −2.5% | −7.5% | +155% | 35.8% | 0.14 | −54.1% | — | $7.3B | — |
| TEX Industrial - MachineryTerex Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −10.7% | −16.1% | −14.8% | −3.6% | −3.4% | +14.8% | +21.6% | +141% | 44.3% | 0.31 | −74.1% | — | $6.0B | — |
| TRN RailroadsTrinity Industries, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −9.9% | −31.1% | −20.6% | −4.1% | −8.8% | +29.7% | +2.5% | +107% | 35.7% | 0.19 | −45.2% | — | $2.0B | — |
| GBX RailroadsThe Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −10.4% | −24.1% | −23.3% | −18.8% | −15.7% | −0.7% | −9.4% | +38.6% | 42.2% | 0.16 | −78.7% | — | $1.2B | — |
| ASTE Industrial - MachineryAstec Industries, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.8% | −26.9% | −32.7% | −11.3% | −16.1% | −3.3% | −21.1% | −26.1% | 42.7% | 0.11 | −62.5% | — | $903M | — |
How did CAT do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where CAT ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CAT and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CAT finished in the top quarter in nine of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 1 of 21.
- CAT finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, WAB came out ahead of CAT most often, in 15 of the 29 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CAT; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CAT among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CAT | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT This pageCaterpillar Inc. | — | +60.3% | +24.7% | +25.9% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +27.0% | +19.5% | −17.6% | +75.0% | +42.1% | −23.0% | +3.5% | +3.4% | +1.6% | −1.5% | +68.5% | +33.2% | −36.8% | +20.5% | +7.8% | +20.7% | +19.7% | +86.1% | −9.8% | +13.7% | +4.1% | +4.7% | −3.0% | +31.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 29 | 1 of 21 | 6 of 21 | 10 of 21 | 3 of 21 | 17 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 13 of 21 | 5 of 21 | 1 of 21 | 10 of 21 | 13 of 21 | 10 of 21 | 21 of 21 | 19 of 21 | 6 of 21 | 6 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 6 of 21 | 10 of 21 | 17 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 10 of 20 | 6 of 20 | 10 of 20 | 5 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 9 of 20 | 9 of 20 | 12 of 19 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | 14 of 28 | +15.9% | +24.0% | +63.6% | +7.0% | +43.3% | +39.1% | +62.6% | −40.4% | +62.8% | +45.6% | −28.9% | +30.9% | +71.3% | +54.0% | +29.9% | +132% | +7.5% | −50.3% | −27.8% | +8.7% | +23.8% | −1.9% | +79.0% | −52.6% | +68.9% | −21.5% | −48.3% | +71.5% | — |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 13 of 29 | +35.4% | −9.4% | +13.7% | −7.3% | +61.4% | +99.1% | +29.6% | −45.1% | +43.8% | +94.9% | −70.2% | −35.8% | +19.9% | −4.0% | −36.9% | +52.7% | +228% | −75.5% | +86.9% | +11.6% | +49.1% | −6.6% | +154% | +25.5% | +56.5% | −59.5% | +102% | −32.9% | −45.6% |
| WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 15 of 29 | +13.2% | +50.1% | +28.0% | +9.1% | +26.5% | −5.2% | +11.5% | −13.3% | −1.4% | +17.3% | −17.9% | +17.3% | +70.1% | +25.4% | +32.4% | +29.7% | +2.8% | +15.6% | +13.5% | +13.1% | +26.5% | +25.4% | +21.8% | +14.6% | +4.9% | −33.5% | −27.2% | −4.5% | +104% |
| MTW The Manitowoc Company, Inc. | 11 of 29 | +31.3% | −45.3% | +82.2% | −50.7% | +39.7% | −23.9% | +18.5% | −62.5% | +64.5% | +72.1% | −30.2% | −4.8% | +49.3% | +71.6% | −29.4% | +32.5% | +17.2% | −82.2% | +64.7% | +138% | +34.1% | +21.5% | +23.8% | −17.2% | +8.3% | −13.7% | +15.5% | +37.9% | +22.2% |
| WNC Wabash National Corporation | 7 of 29 | −48.1% | −32.2% | +14.9% | +18.2% | +15.5% | +20.3% | +15.5% | −38.8% | +38.8% | +33.8% | −4.3% | +0.1% | +37.7% | +14.4% | −33.9% | +527% | −57.9% | −40.6% | −48.3% | −19.9% | −28.7% | −8.1% | +250% | +7.5% | −8.6% | −41.6% | −25.5% | −28.1% | +55.6% |
| DE Deere & Company | 14 of 29 | +11.4% | +7.6% | −5.5% | +26.6% | +28.9% | +58.0% | +18.3% | −2.9% | +54.8% | +39.0% | −11.3% | −0.5% | +8.2% | +14.3% | −5.0% | +56.3% | +44.8% | −58.1% | +98.6% | +42.3% | −6.6% | +16.3% | +44.4% | +7.1% | −2.6% | +8.1% | +34.8% | −42.3% | +46.1% |
| CNH CNH Industrial N.V. | 10 of 29 | −17.1% | −3.2% | −22.0% | −15.8% | +52.6% | +16.8% | +21.5% | −30.3% | +56.1% | +29.4% | −12.9% | −27.3% | +7.7% | +12.2% | −24.7% | +91.1% | +59.9% | −76.3% | +141% | +47.1% | −4.3% | +16.7% | −12.5% | −37.6% | −29.5% | −35.2% | −2.7% | +159% | −74.7% |
| LNN Lindsay Corporation | 12 of 29 | +0.8% | −7.3% | −19.9% | +8.1% | +19.3% | +35.5% | +1.2% | +10.6% | +19.9% | +4.7% | −14.4% | +4.9% | +3.9% | +46.9% | −7.1% | +50.3% | +26.4% | −54.8% | +118% | +71.2% | −24.8% | +3.3% | +18.9% | +11.3% | −13.8% | +24.9% | +24.1% | −48.5% | +39.8% |
| HRI Herc Holdings Inc. | 7 of 19 | −20.1% | +29.4% | +15.5% | −14.4% | +136% | +35.7% | +88.3% | −58.5% | +55.9% | −5.9% | −42.9% | −12.9% | +75.9% | +38.9% | −19.1% | +21.6% | +135% | −68.1% | −8.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PCAR PACCAR Inc | 15 of 29 | +8.0% | +10.8% | +54.5% | +17.0% | +5.6% | +11.8% | +45.1% | −15.3% | +14.9% | +37.1% | −27.1% | +18.3% | +34.9% | +22.9% | −32.5% | +60.3% | +28.9% | −46.4% | +29.8% | +46.9% | −10.4% | +47.3% | +89.8% | +9.4% | +36.5% | +17.1% | +13.4% | −17.5% | +57.5% |
| MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +21.3% | +4.1% | +48.6% | −22.7% | +56.1% | +2.6% | +64.2% | −21.5% | +0.6% | +63.7% | +25.1% | +11.8% | +7.7% | +27.6% | −16.5% | +5.2% | −6.1% | −25.7% | +28.8% | +36.9% | +44.9% | +16.1% | +56.3% | −33.1% | +11.6% | +4.5% | −33.4% | +72.1% | +59.8% |
| OSK Oshkosh Corp | 15 of 29 | +34.5% | −10.8% | +25.2% | −20.5% | +32.5% | −7.5% | +56.6% | −31.6% | +42.3% | +68.4% | −18.5% | −2.2% | +70.4% | +38.7% | −39.3% | −4.8% | +321% | −80.7% | −1.7% | +9.5% | +31.3% | +34.6% | +66.7% | +27.5% | +11.7% | +51.7% | +34.2% | +88.0% | +75.6% |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 13 of 29 | +11.7% | +14.1% | +30.8% | −14.9% | +41.1% | +4.1% | +47.1% | −22.3% | +3.2% | +32.7% | +45.1% | +11.0% | +14.2% | +32.5% | −9.5% | −13.7% | −21.7% | −9.1% | −10.3% | +35.1% | +26.4% | +17.4% | +30.2% | −20.0% | +2.1% | +22.2% | −7.3% | +31.2% | +71.8% |
| ALG Alamo Group Inc. | 10 of 29 | −9.1% | −11.1% | +49.2% | −3.3% | +7.1% | +10.4% | +63.2% | −31.2% | +49.0% | +47.0% | +8.2% | −19.7% | +87.3% | +22.2% | −2.3% | +64.1% | +16.8% | −16.4% | −22.0% | +15.7% | −23.7% | +80.5% | +27.0% | −12.5% | +11.1% | +29.9% | −6.9% | −45.8% | +29.5% |
| CMI Cummins Inc. | 13 of 29 | +49.4% | +48.9% | +1.7% | +14.1% | −1.7% | +30.5% | +38.0% | −22.1% | +32.7% | +60.7% | −37.2% | +4.3% | +32.5% | +25.2% | −18.9% | +143% | +75.2% | −57.4% | +118% | +33.2% | +8.7% | +74.5% | +78.5% | −24.6% | +4.7% | −18.6% | +39.0% | −38.3% | +30.5% |
| AGCO AGCO Corporation | 12 of 29 | +12.8% | −20.5% | −7.9% | +25.0% | +16.2% | +34.8% | +40.0% | −21.3% | +24.2% | +28.9% | +1.4% | −22.9% | +21.3% | +14.3% | −15.2% | +56.7% | +37.1% | −65.3% | +120% | +86.8% | −24.3% | +8.7% | −8.9% | +40.1% | +30.3% | −9.4% | +71.0% | −72.9% | +2.3% |
| TEX Terex Corporation | 11 of 29 | +17.2% | −18.6% | +36.1% | −1.5% | +27.2% | +17.8% | +9.7% | −42.2% | +54.3% | +72.8% | −33.0% | −33.2% | +49.6% | +108% | −56.5% | +56.7% | +14.4% | −73.6% | +1.5% | +118% | +24.7% | +67.3% | +155% | −36.4% | +8.4% | −41.7% | −2.8% | +21.6% | +132% |
| TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 8 of 29 | −21.5% | +37.2% | −6.2% | +1.5% | +17.9% | +23.8% | +11.1% | −22.4% | +37.1% | +18.0% | −12.9% | +3.7% | +54.1% | +20.9% | +14.2% | +55.1% | +13.3% | −42.6% | −20.6% | +20.6% | +30.2% | +11.5% | +64.6% | −29.0% | +12.2% | −9.0% | −24.7% | −12.2% | +21.4% |
| GBX The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 12 of 29 | −21.3% | +41.3% | +36.3% | −24.8% | +29.4% | +17.7% | −15.5% | −24.3% | +30.8% | +31.9% | −38.4% | +64.4% | +103% | −33.4% | +15.6% | +102% | +51.8% | −68.3% | −24.9% | +6.7% | −15.3% | +103% | +135% | −1.6% | −8.8% | −0.2% | −36.6% | −17.1% | +69.8% |
| ASTE Astec Industries, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +30.6% | −8.4% | −7.3% | −40.6% | +20.5% | +39.4% | +40.9% | −47.9% | −12.6% | +67.0% | +4.6% | +2.8% | +16.8% | +7.5% | −0.6% | +20.3% | −14.0% | −15.8% | +6.0% | +7.5% | +89.7% | +40.0% | +23.9% | −31.4% | +9.6% | −29.8% | −32.4% | +232% | +76.6% |
Risk and diversification
How CAT has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CAT's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CAT's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of CAT's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CAT fell 52.3% from April 1999 to October 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 1.5%.
- The slowest recovery came after CAT fell 52.3% from April 1999 to October 2000; it did not regain that peak until July 2003, three years later.
Green means CAT fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CAT fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −73.4% | −52.9% | Jul 2007 | Mar 2009 | 20 months | Sep 2010 | 18 months |
| Dot-com bust | −52.3% | +1.5% | Apr 1999 | Oct 2000 | 18 months | Jul 2003 | 2.8 years |
| No named crash | −44.7% | — | Oct 1987 | Oct 1990 | 3 years | Apr 1993 | 2.5 years |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −44.6% | −2.3% | Jul 2014 | Jan 2016 | 18 months | Apr 2017 | 15 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −43.4% | −17.6% | Jan 2018 | Mar 2020 | 2.2 years | Oct 2020 | 7 months |
How did CAT do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CAT, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- CAT fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when CAT fell 73.3% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, LNN held up best, falling less than CAT in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CAT.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT This pageCaterpillar Inc. | — | −9.7% | −30.1% | −33.1% | −28.5% | −7.3% | −26.0% | −33.2% | −2.2% | −73.3% | −42.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −14.5% | −35.4% | −55.3% | −43.3% | −6.7% | −45.7% | −50.5% | −3.6% | −91.2% | −77.3% |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 1 of 10 | −7.2% | −51.3% | −56.1% | −32.8% | −8.4% | −72.2% | −46.7% | −2.1% | −86.4% | −51.4% |
| WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 6 of 10 | −6.4% | −18.9% | −48.3% | −37.9% | −2.9% | −40.5% | −26.1% | −2.4% | −60.8% | −33.7% |
| MTW The Manitowoc Company, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −14.7% | −60.8% | −33.7% | −47.6% | −8.2% | −28.7% | −62.4% | −5.7% | −95.2% | −47.7% |
| WNC Wabash National Corporation | 1 of 10 | −9.7% | −41.9% | −43.5% | −36.4% | −10.2% | −26.1% | −49.1% | −0.6% | −92.7% | −78.8% |
| DE Deere & Company | 6 of 10 | −6.7% | −33.8% | −37.4% | −17.5% | −6.9% | −24.9% | −24.2% | 0.0% | −73.3% | −37.3% |
| CNH CNH Industrial N.V. | 0 of 10 | −9.6% | −34.7% | −46.5% | −32.7% | −11.1% | −38.6% | −43.2% | −2.5% | −91.3% | −80.9% |
| LNN Lindsay Corporation | 7 of 10 | −5.6% | −24.3% | −32.6% | −18.6% | −1.5% | −25.0% | −32.5% | −1.9% | −82.8% | −36.0% |
| HRI Herc Holdings Inc. | 0 of 9 | −21.3% | −49.9% | −71.3% | −52.0% | −12.2% | −64.2% | −48.3% | −3.0% | −93.8% | — |
| PCAR PACCAR Inc | 5 of 10 | −6.0% | −17.4% | −34.0% | −23.9% | −7.8% | −27.9% | −35.0% | −3.0% | −62.5% | −40.9% |
| MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −8.1% | −32.7% | −44.1% | −20.2% | −4.8% | −33.6% | −21.8% | 0.0% | −56.3% | −45.3% |
| OSK Oshkosh Corp | 3 of 10 | −9.1% | −42.9% | −42.4% | −30.5% | −4.8% | −30.4% | −52.5% | −2.2% | −93.5% | −34.6% |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 7 of 10 | −7.2% | −32.5% | −43.4% | −27.1% | −7.3% | −22.8% | −26.4% | −1.3% | −61.0% | −39.7% |
| ALG Alamo Group Inc. | 7 of 10 | −5.9% | −31.1% | −41.7% | −22.6% | −1.8% | −15.5% | −17.2% | −4.8% | −62.9% | −28.8% |
| CMI Cummins Inc. | 4 of 10 | −7.9% | −20.7% | −38.6% | −17.7% | −11.0% | −35.1% | −27.6% | −2.9% | −75.7% | −60.2% |
| AGCO AGCO Corporation | 3 of 10 | −9.7% | −36.9% | −46.1% | −19.2% | −8.0% | −24.1% | −36.6% | −0.6% | −78.7% | −44.1% |
| TEX Terex Corporation | 0 of 10 | −13.7% | −41.1% | −50.2% | −38.7% | −8.3% | −45.9% | −60.4% | −8.6% | −91.6% | −45.3% |
| TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −11.7% | −38.5% | −34.4% | −30.8% | −5.4% | −32.8% | −43.3% | −4.6% | −83.9% | −45.9% |
| GBX The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −12.0% | −53.9% | −50.1% | −41.2% | −5.9% | −53.6% | −51.5% | −8.0% | −93.5% | −56.9% |
| ASTE Astec Industries, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −11.5% | −56.1% | −38.7% | −46.1% | −5.3% | −20.9% | −29.4% | −4.2% | −67.7% | −71.7% |
How closely does CAT move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CAT with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, CAT captured 148% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 122% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.27. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Only DE had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CAT's 1.21, out of 20 popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CAT's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT This pageCaterpillar Inc. | 148% | 122% | 1.21 | 1.27 |
| DE Deere & Company | 110% | 66% | 1.67 | 0.98 |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | 177% | 165% | 1.07 | 1.90 |
| CMI Cummins Inc. | 118% | 118% | 1.00 | 1.15 |
| PCAR PACCAR Inc | 103% | 108% | 0.95 | 0.97 |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 164% | 181% | 0.90 | 1.74 |
| MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 83% | 93% | 0.90 | 0.88 |
| WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 111% | 127% | 0.87 | 1.28 |
| LNN Lindsay Corporation | 43% | 50% | 0.86 | 0.53 |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 75% | 91% | 0.83 | 0.83 |
| ALG Alamo Group Inc. | 80% | 97% | 0.83 | 1.05 |
| AGCO AGCO Corporation | 99% | 121% | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| HRI Herc Holdings Inc. | 196% | 272% | 0.72 | 2.46 |
| OSK Oshkosh Corp | 127% | 178% | 0.71 | 1.41 |
| CNH CNH Industrial N.V. | 113% | 168% | 0.67 | 1.48 |
| TEX Terex Corporation | 133% | 199% | 0.67 | 1.60 |
| TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 110% | 165% | 0.67 | 1.38 |
| GBX The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 124% | 211% | 0.59 | 1.50 |
| MTW The Manitowoc Company, Inc. | 153% | 279% | 0.55 | 2.07 |
| WNC Wabash National Corporation | 115% | 217% | 0.53 | 1.64 |
| ASTE Astec Industries, Inc. | 69% | 155% | 0.45 | 1.35 |
What diversifies CAT?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CAT's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CAT with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CAT into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+35.8% for CAT alone, +37.4% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and FDL have moved largely independently of CAT over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, MCK and MPC have moved largely independently of CAT over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.38 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CAT lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CAT and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +288% | 1.01 | −17.6% | −23.0% | −1.5% | −36.8% | −9.8% | −3.0% | 37.9% | +35.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.46 | +119% | 1.48 | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 31.2% | +32.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.46 | +225% | 1.34 | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 31.5% | +35.1% |
| FDL Dividend & IncomeFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 0.49 | +91.8% | 0.98 | −6.0% | +2.6% | +14.5% | −31.1% | — | — | 32.0% | +32.1% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.44 | +140% | 0.97 | −15.3% | −15.6% | −9.8% | −36.8% | −13.6% | +50.5% | 32.1% | +33.8% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.48 | +135% | 0.97 | −15.5% | −35.3% | — | — | — | — | 32.3% | +33.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.00 | +126% | 0.96 | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | — | — | 30.5% | +33.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.37 | +177% | 0.93 | −18.2% | −21.5% | +2.8% | −39.0% | −14.8% | — | 32.6% | +34.5% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.39 | +111% | 0.89 | −12.6% | −25.7% | +10.2% | — | — | — | 31.9% | +33.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +288% | 1.01 | −17.6% | −23.0% | −1.5% | −36.8% | −9.8% | −3.0% | 37.9% | +35.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.38 | +479% | 1.55 | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −8.3% | +51.7% | 32.7% | +37.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.15 | +413% | 1.44 | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +46.9% | 31.4% | +37.4% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.26 | +690% | 1.41 | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | 32.6% | +40.1% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.46 | +594% | 1.36 | −37.5% | −36.3% | −42.9% | −67.4% | −33.1% | +7.0% | 34.0% | +39.8% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.41 | +1,008% | 1.34 | −9.8% | −66.7% | −12.2% | −70.0% | −60.8% | — | 35.2% | +43.0% |
Common questions
What was CAT's worst drawdown?
CAT's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 73.4%, from July 2007 to March 2009. It took 18 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were CAT's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, CAT's best year was 2003, when it returned 86.1%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -36.8%.
Is there a better investment than CAT?
Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ESLT (aerospace & defense) earned more for the risk it took than CAT over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 35.4%, against 43.4% for CAT. Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CAT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them HSBC, MUFG and MCK.
Is CAT more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CAT's volatility over the past 5 years was 31.9%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CAT's return lands within 31.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CAT's Sharpe ratio?
CAT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.01, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CAT earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CAT with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CAT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.65 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CAT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CAT holding.
What are the best alternatives to CAT?
None of the 20 popular alternatives we compared outperformed CAT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about CAT's strength than about its alternatives.
Did CAT outperform the S&P 500?
CAT finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +60.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CAT do in stock market crashes?
CAT fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when CAT fell 73.3% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies CAT?
These had a low correlation with CAT over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.46), DXJ (correlation 0.46) and FDL (correlation 0.49); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.38), MCK (correlation 0.15) and MPC (correlation 0.26). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CAT's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CAT's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to CAT
URIUnited Rentals
FCXFreeport-McMoRan
WABWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies
DEDeere & Company
PCARPACCAR
CMICummins