Relative Intelligence · Computer Hardware

How Garmin (GRMN) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on GRMN alone. It places GRMN (Garmin Ltd.) against 14 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where GRMN stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: GRMN's full trading record, from December 2000 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowGRMN has run far ahead of the market, rising 19.1% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its computer hardware peers were far apart over the past 3 months, from GPRO (GoPro, up 61.0%) to AAPL (Apple, up 4.0%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?More than an industry move: GRMN rose 19.1% over the past 3 months, against 6.3% for the computer hardware ETF VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF). The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its computer hardware peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: GPRO (GoPro) rose 61.0%, while AAPL (Apple) rose 4.0%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsGRMN led its computer hardware peers in 2023, then fell behind AAPL (Apple) and IRDM (Iridium Communications) in 2025. On the flip side, over the past year, GRMN rose 18.5% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (196% against 89.3%). Consistency ↓
- Long termGRMN turned $10,000 into $77,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. GRMN's 10-year return of 670% puts it ahead of 91% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, GRMN has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500. The 2022 bear market took 40.0% off GRMN, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than AAPL (Apple, 27.4%) but less than SONY (Sony Group, 50.6%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, GRMN has a correlation of 0.44 over 5 years, more closely than 61% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, GRMN's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.93: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.1 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 80% as much. Market capture ↓
- Better optionsAmong GRMN's popular alternatives, AAPL (Apple) earned more than GRMN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 31.6%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CSCO (Cisco Systems, communications equipment) and RTX (avionics theme) earned more than GRMN with less volatility over the past 5 years. CSCO returned 16.8% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 31.6%. Better options ↓
How much would $10,000 in GRMN have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in GRMN over the past 25 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of GRMN over the same span and GRMN's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in GRMN at the end of September 2001 would have grown to $689,548 by September 2026, more than the $114,557 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of GRMN, and MNST finished highest, at $22,832,107.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2001 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 77 of the 1,326 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of GRMN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$23M+228,221% total · +36.3% a year
- AAPL$14M+143,470% total · +33.7% a year
- NEU$3M+31,728% total · +25.9% a year
- CMI$1M+10,707% total · +20.6% a year
- ORLY$894,377+8,844% total · +19.7% a year
- GRMN$689,548+6,795% total · +18.5% a year
- LOGI$246,326+2,363% total · +13.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$114,557+1,046% total · +10.2% a year
- HWM$58,428+484% total · +7.3% a year
- SONY$42,551+326% total · +6.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 742 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of GRMN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- HWM$73,554+636% total · +49.0% a year
- PANW$49,770+398% total · +37.8% a year
- SMH$48,982+390% total · +37.4% a year
- AAPL$24,129+141% total · +19.3% a year
- CSCO$22,737+127% total · +17.9% a year
- GRMN$20,536+105% total · +15.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- LOGI$12,457+24.6% total · +4.5% a year
- SONY$10,955+9.5% total · +1.8% a year
- CRSR$5,206−47.9% total · −12.2% a year
GRMN at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- GRMN's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 87.7%, from October 2007 to November 2008. It took about ten years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 25 full calendar years, GRMN's best was 2003, when it returned 87.6%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 79.3%. It lost money in four of those years.
- GRMN is 6.9% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $56B
- Industry
- Hardware, Equipment & Parts
- Price history from
- December 2000
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +18.5%total return
- Past 3 years
- +196%+43.6% a year
- Past 5 years
- +99.1%+14.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +670%+22.6% a year
- Best calendar year
- +87.6%2003
- Worst calendar year
- −79.3%2008
- Losing years
- 4 of 25full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 31.6%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.59return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −87.7%Oct 2007 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −6.9%below the peak
GRMN against the whole market
Where GRMN ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does GRMN rank among all stocks?
This section ranks GRMN on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how GRMN stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- GRMN's 10-year return ranks in the top 9% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | GRMN | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +18.5% | 1,295 of 3,287 | top 39% |
| 3-year return | +196% | 420 of 3,017 | top 14% |
| 5-year return | +99.1% | 690 of 2,893 | top 24% |
| 10-year return | +670% | 205 of 2,202 | top 9% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 31.6% | 875 of 2,893 | top 30% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.59 | 690 of 2,893 | top 24% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −54.6% | 650 of 2,187 | top 30% |
What has beaten GRMN on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). GRMN sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than GRMN with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 123 stocks and 56 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than GRMN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 5% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half GRMN's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 22% less than GRMN's 31.6%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.59 for GRMN.
- Among GRMN's popular alternatives, AAPL is in the region. AAPL earned 18.5% a year against 14.8% a year for GRMN, at 28.0% volatility, 11% less than GRMN's 31.6%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to GRMN; faint dots are 93 more of the 179 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than GRMN?
Investments that beat GRMN over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among GRMN's popular alternatives, AAPL earned more than GRMN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 31.6%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CSCO (communications equipment) and RTX (avionics theme) earned more than GRMN with less volatility over the past 5 years. CSCO returned 16.8% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 31.6%.
- Across the whole market, 179 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than GRMN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, WMT and JPM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat GRMN over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks GRMN's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than GRMN follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than GRMN's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× GRMN's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than GRMN's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with GRMN?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +14.8% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | +670% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.44 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against GRMN. 2 of 14 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.29 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatility | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Computer Hardware and the categories next to it (Semiconductors, Communications Equipment, Software, IT Services), plus GRMN's specific themes. 17 of 154 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | -0.09 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.23 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.20 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 403 of 3,466 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.29 | 0.09% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.05 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.39 | — | |
FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.29 | 0.19% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.33 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.22 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for GRMN
- Annual return
- GRMN returned 14.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $19,900. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- GRMN's volatility over the past 5 years was 31.6%, 1.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, GRMN's return lands within 31.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- GRMN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.59, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so GRMN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- GRMN's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 54.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 54.6% fall takes a 120% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, GRMN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.44 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against GRMN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a GRMN holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 179 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than GRMN with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with GRMN | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.29 | 0.09% | |
| 2 | Popular alternative | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.29 | — | |
| 3 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.39 | — |
| 4 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.29 | 0.19% |
| 5 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.33 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.01 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.27 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.49 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.22 | — | |
| 10 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.35 | 0.48% |
| 11 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.59 | 0.40% |
| 12 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.36 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.28 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.26 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.01 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.32 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.25 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.17 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +521% | 0.31 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.13 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.32 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.15 | 0.40% | |
| 23 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.39 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.19 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | -0.01 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.43 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.43 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.31 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.22 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.25 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.23 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.55 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.55 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +19.9% | 29.0% | 0.77 | −44.0% | +444% | 0.30 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.18 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.38 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.46 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.32 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +17.9% | 26.1% | 0.76 | −37.9% | +314% | 0.41 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.40 | — | |
| 41 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.37 | — |
| 42 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.47 | — | |
| 43 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.09 | 0.80% |
| 44 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.29 | — |
| 45 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.21 | — |
| 46 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.23 | — |
| 47 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.29 | 0.13% |
| 48 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.22 | — |
| 49 | HUBBHubbell Incorporated · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +21.0% | 30.0% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +442% | 0.18 | — |
| 50 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.50 | 0.56% |
| 51 | Same or nearby category | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.17 | — | |
| 52 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.31 | — |
| 53 | RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | +215% | 0.10 | — |
| 54 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.31 | 0.59% |
| 55 | ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc. · Auto Parts | Whole market | +27.3% | 29.9% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +367% | 0.44 | — |
| 56 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.8% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +340% | 0.39 | — |
| 57 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.32 | 0.15% |
| 58 | ORIOld Republic International Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +17.0% | 22.2% | 0.82 | −47.8% | +349% | 0.40 | — |
| 59 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.28 | — |
| 60 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.25 | — |
| 61 | XNTKState Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.9% | 29.3% | 0.68 | −48.3% | +728% | 0.23 | 0.35% |
| 62 | PPAInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETF · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 18.9% | 0.90 | −43.9% | +344% | 0.36 | 0.58% |
| 63 | AIRRFirst Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF · US Industrials | Whole market | +18.3% | 25.9% | 0.78 | −42.4% | +407% | 0.38 | 0.69% |
| 64 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.27 | — |
| 65 | AXSAXIS Capital Holdings Limited · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +16.7% | 25.2% | 0.74 | −49.3% | +137% | 0.26 | — |
| 66 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.24 | 0.40% |
| 67 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.30 | 0.40% |
| 68 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.35 | 0.50% |
| 69 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.23 | — | |
| 70 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.31 | 0.15% |
| 71 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · International | Whole market | +17.3% | 22.8% | 0.82 | −40.5% | — | 0.28 | 0.49% |
| 72 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 22.8% | 0.77 | −32.3% | +286% | 0.28 | — |
| 73 | BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | 0.21 | — |
| 74 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.14 | — | |
| 75 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.33 | 0.45% |
| 76 | CTBICommunity Trust Bancorp, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +16.0% | 26.0% | 0.70 | −43.0% | +192% | 0.31 | — |
| 77 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.35 | — | |
| 78 | NANRState Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.6% | 0.83 | −49.1% | +241% | 0.30 | 0.35% |
| 79 | THFFFirst Financial Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 26.2% | 0.69 | −42.8% | +161% | 0.19 | — |
| 80 | UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund · Energy | Whole market | +18.7% | 19.2% | 0.99 | −48.1% | — | 0.42 | 0.85% |
| 81 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.28 | — | |
| 82 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.34 | 0.70% |
| 83 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.41 | — | |
| 84 | VLGEAVillage Super Market, Inc. · Grocery Stores | Whole market | +17.8% | 28.3% | 0.72 | −46.8% | +96.3% | 0.30 | — |
| 85 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.30 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.44 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +627% | 0.30 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | 0.23 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.42 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.09 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.40 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.41 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.31 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.30 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.29 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.33 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.7% | 0.66 | −63.9% | +141% | 0.24 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.40 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.32 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.42 | — |
GRMN against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against GRMN, compared period by period and year by year.
How do GRMN's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at GRMN, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only AAPL was both more rewarding and calmer than GRMN over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Ten of the 14 popular alternatives earned less than GRMN over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, GRMN returned 14.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (31.6% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than GRMN with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | +47.3% | 32.5% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | +18.4% | 28.0% |
| GRMN This pageGarmin Ltd. | +14.8% | 31.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | +8.2% | 42.8% |
| TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | +7.5% | 24.5% |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | +5.7% | 37.0% |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | +2.9% | 29.2% |
| IRDM Iridium Communications Inc. | +2.4% | 46.2% |
| BC Brunswick Corporation | −5.6% | 38.3% |
| TRMB Trimble Inc. | −6.4% | 33.5% |
| SONO Sonos, Inc. | −11.9% | 48.7% |
| CRSR Corsair Gaming, Inc. | −12.3% | 62.4% |
| NKE NIKE, Inc. | −23.5% | 35.8% |
| LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | −24.8% | 43.4% |
| GPRO GoPro, Inc. | −34.5% | 81.0% |
Has GRMN consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares GRMN with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than GRMN helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 14 popular alternatives outperformed GRMN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was HWM.
- AAPL earned more for the risk it took than GRMN (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
- HWM outperformed GRMN over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so GRMN has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than GRMN over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| GRMN Garmin Ltd. (this page) | — | +3.6% | +19.1% | +9.4% | +45.2% | +18.5% | +196% | +99.1% | +670% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | — | $56B | — |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −6.9% | −22.1% | −17.1% | +0.1% | +10.2% | +391% | +594% | +1,028% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | — | $84B | — |
| AAPL Consumer ElectronicsApple Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | +0.2% | +4.0% | +24.6% | +25.6% | +29.9% | +99.0% | +133% | +1,168% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | — | $5.0T | — |
| CRSR Computer HardwareCorsair Gaming, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −2.5% | +39.5% | +102% | +119% | +61.1% | +1.5% | −48.2% | — | 62.4% | 0.09 | −91.1% | — | $1.4B | — |
| SONY Consumer ElectronicsSony Group Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +19.7% | +18.1% | −2.2% | −13.2% | +54.0% | +15.4% | +309% | 29.2% | 0.24 | −50.6% | — | $150B | — |
| LOGI Computer HardwareLogitech International S.A. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +5.6% | +9.1% | +11.0% | +10.7% | +0.8% | +65.4% | +32.1% | +489% | 37.0% | 0.34 | −67.8% | — | $16B | — |
| IRDM Telecommunications ServicesIridium Communications Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −8.9% | −5.0% | +5.9% | +151% | +140% | +21.4% | +12.8% | +458% | 46.2% | 0.28 | −75.3% | — | $4.7B | — |
| SONO Consumer ElectronicsSonos, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.2% | +14.3% | +18.8% | −0.7% | +2.5% | +55.2% | −47.1% | — | 48.7% | -0.02 | −82.5% | — | $2.1B | — |
| QCOM SemiconductorsQUALCOMM Incorporated | 1/5 short0/3 long | −9.5% | +3.7% | +28.9% | +3.2% | +7.4% | +72.4% | +48.3% | +239% | 42.8% | 0.40 | −44.3% | — | $188B | — |
| TRMB Hardware, Equipment & PartsTrimble Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +7.6% | +16.7% | −10.6% | −20.7% | −20.9% | +27.3% | −28.2% | +111% | 33.5% | -0.03 | −57.4% | — | $14B | — |
| NKE Apparel - Footwear & AccessoriesNIKE, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.9% | −11.9% | −16.9% | −38.6% | −42.1% | −60.4% | −73.8% | −15.5% | 35.8% | -0.57 | −79.1% | — | $56B | — |
| GPRO Consumer ElectronicsGoPro, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −15.4% | +61.0% | −14.1% | −24.7% | −48.6% | −57.7% | −88.0% | −92.5% | 81.0% | -0.14 | −96.8% | — | $206M | — |
| TDY Hardware, Equipment & PartsTeledyne Technologies Incorporated | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.7% | +0.8% | −2.2% | +21.8% | +10.5% | +62.6% | +43.7% | +499% | 24.5% | 0.42 | −48.9% | — | $29B | — |
| LULU Apparel - RetailLululemon Athletica Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.3% | −14.3% | −40.1% | −52.6% | −42.0% | −74.8% | −75.9% | +73.0% | 43.4% | -0.44 | −82.0% | — | $12B | — |
| BC Auto - Recreational VehiclesBrunswick Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.3% | −16.4% | −19.3% | −11.9% | +6.2% | −2.1% | −25.2% | +61.1% | 38.3% | 0.04 | −61.0% | — | $4.3B | — |
How did GRMN do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2001, along with where GRMN ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with GRMN and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, GRMN finished in the top quarter in nine of 25 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 11 of 15.
- GRMN finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 25 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, AAPL came out ahead of GRMN most often, in 17 of the 25 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of GRMN; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places GRMN among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of GRMN | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRMN This pageGarmin Ltd. | — | −0.1% | +63.3% | +43.1% | −30.2% | +15.9% | +25.9% | +58.1% | +9.8% | +27.6% | +36.5% | −26.1% | +18.3% | +18.6% | +6.7% | +34.7% | +5.1% | +64.1% | −79.3% | +75.6% | +69.5% | +9.9% | +12.7% | +87.6% | +37.4% | +7.8% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 25 | 11 of 15 | 2 of 15 | 4 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 12 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 5 of 13 | 7 of 13 | 4 of 13 | 10 of 13 | 6 of 12 | 8 of 12 | 8 of 12 | 2 of 12 | 10 of 12 | 4 of 12 | 10 of 11 | 2 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 5 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 25 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% |
| HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 9 of 25 | +87.9% | +103% | +37.8% | +24.2% | +11.7% | −7.2% | +83.6% | −37.5% | +48.4% | −11.5% | −36.3% | +50.9% | +25.6% | +2.9% | −42.9% | −2.8% | +51.3% | −67.4% | +26.4% | +5.5% | −1.8% | −14.1% | +75.3% | −33.1% | +9.8% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 17 of 25 | +9.0% | +30.7% | +49.0% | −26.4% | +34.6% | +82.3% | +89.0% | −5.4% | +48.5% | +12.5% | −3.0% | +40.6% | +8.0% | +32.6% | +25.5% | +53.2% | +147% | −56.9% | +133% | +18.1% | +123% | +201% | +49.1% | −34.6% | +47.2% |
| CRSR Corsair Gaming, Inc. | 0 of 5 | −10.1% | −53.1% | +3.9% | −35.4% | −42.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 9 of 25 | +21.7% | +12.4% | +24.9% | −39.3% | +25.6% | +49.7% | +41.7% | +8.1% | +61.1% | +14.8% | +20.7% | +19.0% | +56.6% | −36.7% | −48.8% | +24.1% | +34.2% | −59.3% | +27.3% | +5.6% | +5.5% | +13.0% | −15.6% | −8.0% | −34.9% |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | 13 of 25 | +23.4% | −12.0% | +55.2% | −22.9% | −14.3% | +109% | +53.5% | −5.7% | +38.1% | +68.8% | +16.6% | +1.7% | +86.1% | +5.2% | −58.1% | +8.4% | +9.8% | −57.5% | +28.1% | +22.3% | +54.1% | +42.8% | +39.3% | −15.4% | +49.0% |
| IRDM Iridium Communications Inc. | 5 of 17 | −38.5% | −28.1% | −19.1% | +24.5% | +5.0% | +59.6% | +33.5% | +56.4% | +22.9% | +14.3% | −13.8% | +56.0% | −7.0% | −12.8% | −6.5% | +2.7% | −10.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SONO Sonos, Inc. | 3 of 7 | +16.8% | −12.3% | +1.4% | −43.3% | +27.4% | +49.7% | +59.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 9 of 25 | +13.8% | +8.3% | +35.1% | −38.6% | +22.3% | +77.1% | +60.8% | −7.6% | +1.1% | +35.1% | −30.6% | +2.3% | +22.4% | +14.9% | +12.3% | +9.0% | +31.1% | −7.6% | +5.5% | −11.3% | +2.5% | +58.3% | +49.1% | −28.0% | −38.5% |
| TRMB Trimble Inc. | 11 of 25 | +10.9% | +32.8% | +5.2% | −42.0% | +30.6% | +60.2% | +26.7% | −19.0% | +34.8% | +40.6% | −19.2% | −23.5% | +16.1% | +37.7% | +8.7% | +58.5% | +16.6% | −28.5% | +19.2% | +43.0% | +7.4% | +33.0% | +199% | −23.0% | −32.5% |
| NKE NIKE, Inc. | 11 of 25 | −13.8% | −29.1% | −6.0% | −29.0% | +18.7% | +41.0% | +38.1% | +19.9% | +24.7% | −17.7% | +31.4% | +23.8% | +54.4% | +8.7% | +14.5% | +31.2% | +32.0% | −19.3% | +31.4% | +15.0% | −3.7% | +33.4% | +54.9% | −20.6% | +1.4% |
| GPRO GoPro, Inc. | 3 of 11 | +29.4% | −68.6% | −30.3% | −51.7% | +24.5% | +90.8% | +2.4% | −44.0% | −13.1% | −51.6% | −71.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | 12 of 25 | +10.0% | +4.0% | +11.6% | −8.5% | +11.5% | +13.1% | +67.3% | +14.3% | +47.3% | +38.7% | −13.7% | +11.8% | +41.2% | +18.6% | +24.7% | +14.6% | −13.9% | −16.5% | +32.9% | +37.9% | −1.1% | +56.1% | +20.2% | −3.8% | −31.1% |
| LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 10 of 18 | −45.7% | −25.2% | +59.6% | −18.2% | +12.5% | +50.2% | +90.5% | +54.7% | +20.9% | +23.9% | −5.9% | −5.5% | −22.6% | +63.4% | +36.4% | +127% | +279% | −83.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BC Brunswick Corporation | 12 of 25 | +18.1% | −31.8% | +36.9% | −27.1% | +33.8% | +29.2% | +31.4% | −14.8% | +2.5% | +9.5% | −0.5% | +12.4% | +58.7% | +61.5% | −3.4% | +47.9% | +203% | −74.7% | −44.9% | −20.1% | −16.6% | +57.5% | +62.9% | −6.4% | +35.7% |
Risk and diversification
How GRMN has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were GRMN's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents GRMN's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2000, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of GRMN's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: GRMN fell 51.0% from January to May 2004, while the S&P 500 slipped only 3.4%.
- The slowest recovery came after GRMN fell 87.7% from October 2007 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until February 2019, ten years later.
Green means GRMN fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | GRMN fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −87.7% | −50.0% | Oct 2007 | Nov 2008 | 13 months | Feb 2019 | 10.3 years |
| 2022 bear market | −54.6% | −19.7% | Aug 2021 | Oct 2022 | 14 months | May 2024 | 19 months |
| No named crash | −51.0% | −3.4% | Jan 2004 | May 2004 | 4 months | Nov 2004 | 6 months |
| Dot-com bust | −42.7% | −25.4% | Feb 2001 | Sep 2001 | 7 months | Dec 2002 | 15 months |
| Covid crash | −38.1% | −33.7% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Aug 2020 | 5 months |
How did GRMN do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far GRMN, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: GRMN began trading on December 8, 2000, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than GRMN in most of the crashes they both traded through.
- GRMN began trading after the dot-com bust, but nine of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was BC's 39.0%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
- GRMN fell less than the S&P 500 in four of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when GRMN fell 9.3% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than GRMN.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRMN This pageGarmin Ltd. | — | −3.2% | −40.0% | −38.1% | −12.9% | −3.1% | −20.3% | −9.3% | 0.0% | −87.7% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 1 of 9 | −8.5% | −20.2% | −64.8% | −30.8% | −16.0% | −38.4% | −43.5% | 0.0% | −87.3% | −58.3% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 3 of 9 | −2.9% | −27.4% | −30.7% | −36.5% | −4.8% | −23.4% | −12.5% | −4.3% | −60.9% | −81.2% |
| CRSR Corsair Gaming, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −5.4% | −52.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 2 of 9 | −3.8% | −50.6% | −22.9% | −24.3% | −9.7% | −30.2% | −32.0% | −1.0% | −72.3% | −76.2% |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | 4 of 9 | −0.8% | −48.3% | −21.3% | −35.9% | −8.3% | −14.3% | −33.7% | −3.0% | −79.4% | −59.0% |
| IRDM Iridium Communications Inc. | 2 of 8 | −1.2% | −21.6% | −42.4% | −29.9% | −4.5% | −28.2% | −32.9% | −0.4% | — | — |
| SONO Sonos, Inc. | 0 of 4 | −3.2% | −55.1% | −50.7% | −40.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 2 of 9 | −5.6% | −41.5% | −32.2% | −26.8% | −6.6% | −30.7% | −19.2% | −0.5% | −48.0% | −84.9% |
| TRMB Trimble Inc. | 2 of 9 | −6.7% | −38.9% | −53.8% | −30.9% | −12.0% | −20.4% | −16.7% | −2.4% | −71.9% | −87.2% |
| NKE NIKE, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −2.5% | −49.7% | −38.6% | −20.8% | −7.0% | −17.9% | −14.3% | −2.4% | −44.1% | −39.1% |
| GPRO GoPro, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −3.9% | −54.8% | −50.4% | −44.9% | −3.0% | −84.9% | — | — | — | — |
| TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | 2 of 9 | −5.0% | −32.0% | −48.9% | −22.7% | −7.6% | −27.5% | −16.5% | −5.1% | −66.2% | −59.5% |
| LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 1 of 9 | −4.2% | −36.4% | −47.3% | −30.3% | −5.3% | −33.9% | −29.4% | −3.6% | −92.2% | — |
| BC Brunswick Corporation | 1 of 9 | −8.6% | −37.9% | −58.9% | −36.8% | −5.2% | −31.4% | −38.6% | −3.2% | −91.1% | −39.0% |
How closely does GRMN move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares GRMN with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, GRMN captured 111% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 80% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.93. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only AAPL had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than GRMN's 1.39, out of 12 popular alternatives with the same record.
- IRDM took just 72% of the S&P 500's losses, against 80% for GRMN, while still keeping 100% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than GRMN's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRMN This pageGarmin Ltd. | 111% | 80% | 1.39 | 0.93 |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 137% | 94% | 1.46 | 1.15 |
| IRDM Iridium Communications Inc. | 100% | 72% | 1.39 | 0.99 |
| TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | 101% | 81% | 1.24 | 1.02 |
| HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 142% | 115% | 1.23 | 1.41 |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | 112% | 106% | 1.05 | 1.01 |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 96% | 99% | 0.97 | 0.86 |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 115% | 139% | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| TRMB Trimble Inc. | 121% | 187% | 0.65 | 1.46 |
| LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 83% | 132% | 0.63 | 1.12 |
| BC Brunswick Corporation | 117% | 194% | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| NKE NIKE, Inc. | 71% | 155% | 0.46 | 1.01 |
| GPRO GoPro, Inc. | 42% | 248% | 0.17 | 1.86 |
What diversifies GRMN?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with GRMN's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing GRMN with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in GRMN into CAH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+15.5% for GRMN alone, +21.0% for the mix).
- CAH made money in three of the four calendar years in which GRMN lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and HDV have moved largely independently of GRMN over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which GRMN lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% GRMN and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2015 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRMN Garmin Ltd. (this page) | 1.00 | +99.1% | 0.59 | −0.1% | −30.2% | −26.1% | −79.3% | 29.1% | +15.5% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.35 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | +7.7% | −20.8% | 24.3% | +18.4% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.46 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | −25.3% | — | 24.7% | +16.1% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.49 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | −0.3% | — | 24.8% | +15.3% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.23 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | −0.3% | −44.7% | 25.8% | +21.0% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.15 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | −10.7% | +4.9% | 24.0% | +16.9% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.29 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | — | — | 24.8% | +17.5% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.24 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | +64.4% | −21.5% | −39.0% | 25.1% | +18.0% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.48 | +99.4% | 0.93 | +45.4% | −3.7% | — | — | 24.9% | +16.1% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2015 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRMN Garmin Ltd. (this page) | 1.00 | +99.1% | 0.59 | −0.1% | −30.2% | −26.1% | −79.3% | 29.1% | +15.5% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.01 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | +12.6% | −39.6% | 23.9% | +21.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.24 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | −6.0% | −20.5% | 28.4% | +33.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.22 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +67.7% | −15.2% | 26.7% | +29.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.26 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −4.5% | −40.4% | 25.0% | +20.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.18 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | +17.4% | — | 25.3% | +22.9% |
Common questions
What was GRMN's worst drawdown?
GRMN's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 87.7%, from October 2007 to November 2008. It took about ten years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were GRMN's best and worst years?
Over 25 full calendar years, GRMN's best year was 2003, when it returned 87.6%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -79.3%.
Is there a better investment than GRMN?
Among GRMN's popular alternatives, AAPL earned more than GRMN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 31.6%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CSCO (communications equipment) and RTX (avionics theme) earned more than GRMN with less volatility over the past 5 years. CSCO returned 16.8% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 31.6%.
Is GRMN more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. GRMN's volatility over the past 5 years was 31.6%, 1.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, GRMN's return lands within 31.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is GRMN's Sharpe ratio?
GRMN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.59, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so GRMN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is GRMN with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, GRMN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.44 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against GRMN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a GRMN holding.
What are the best alternatives to GRMN?
None of the 14 popular alternatives we compared outperformed GRMN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about GRMN's strength than about its alternatives.
Did GRMN outperform the S&P 500?
GRMN finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 25 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -0.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did GRMN do in stock market crashes?
GRMN fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when GRMN fell 9.3% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
What diversifies GRMN?
These had a low correlation with GRMN over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.35), EMLP (correlation 0.46) and HDV (correlation 0.49); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.01), CLS (correlation 0.24) and FIX (correlation 0.22). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than GRMN's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of GRMN's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.