Relative Intelligence · Semiconductors

How QUALCOMM (QCOM) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on QCOM alone. It places QCOM (QUALCOMM Incorporated) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where QCOM stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: QCOM's full trading record, from December 1991 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, QCOM rose 28.9% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Even so, QCOM is 29.4% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?QCOM rose 3.7% over the past 3 months, 6.0 points ahead of the semiconductors ETF SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF), which fell 2.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its semiconductor peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: MRVL (Marvell Technology) rose 23.4%, while AVGO (Broadcom) fell 11.4%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsQCOM has trailed the market, rising 7.4% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (72.4% against 89.3%). QCOM finished behind the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termQCOM turned $10,000 into $33,900 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, QCOM has typically fallen 1.5 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, QCOM has a correlation of 0.58 over 5 years, more closely than 86% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, QCOM's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.51: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.2 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.4 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- ADI (Analog Devices), TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing) and AAPL (Apple) earned more than QCOM with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 8.2% a year at 42.8%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- APH (Amphenol, automotive electronics theme) and CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF, cybersecurity) earned more than QCOM with less volatility over the past 5 years. APH returned 33.8% a year at 32.2% volatility, against 8.2% a year at 42.8%.
- Whole market
- 1,005 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than QCOM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in QCOM have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in QCOM over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of QCOM over the same span and QCOM's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in QCOM at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $779,813 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of QCOM, and MNST finished highest, at $45,663,831.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 51 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of QCOM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$46M+456,538% total · +33.7% a year
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- APH$3M+29,926% total · +21.7% a year
- SCCO$3M+26,680% total · +21.3% a year
- GILD$2M+15,614% total · +19.1% a year
- QCOM$779,813+7,698% total · +16.2% a year
- ADI$385,909+3,759% total · +13.4% a year
- AMD$375,764+3,658% total · +13.3% a year
- SMTC$206,420+1,964% total · +11.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,402 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of QCOM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- AMD$59,452+495% total · +42.8% a year
- MRVL$44,627+346% total · +34.9% a year
- MTSI$43,907+339% total · +34.4% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- ADI$25,751+158% total · +20.8% a year
- AAPL$24,129+141% total · +19.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- TXN$16,791+67.9% total · +10.9% a year
- QCOM$15,915+59.1% total · +9.7% a year
QCOM at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- QCOM is still 29.4% below its all-time high.
- QCOM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1991 was 86.7%, from January 2000 to August 2002. It took about 12 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, QCOM's best was 1999, when it returned 2,621%, and its worst was 2000, when it lost 53.3%. It lost money in eight of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $188B
- Industry
- Semiconductors
- Price history from
- December 1991
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +7.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +72.4%+19.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +48.3%+8.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +239%+13.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +2,621%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −53.3%2000
- Losing years
- 8 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 42.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.40return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −86.7%Jan 2000 to Aug 2002
- From its all-time high
- −29.4%below the peak
QCOM against the whole market
Where QCOM ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does QCOM rank among all stocks?
This section ranks QCOM on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how QCOM stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- QCOM's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 12% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | QCOM | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +7.4% | 1,682 of 3,287 | bottom 50% |
| 3-year return | +72.4% | 1,214 of 3,017 | top 40% |
| 5-year return | +48.3% | 1,108 of 2,893 | top 38% |
| 10-year return | +239% | 747 of 2,202 | top 34% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 42.8% | 1,594 of 2,893 | bottom 46% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.40 | 1,238 of 2,893 | top 43% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −44.3% | 268 of 2,187 | top 12% |
What has beaten QCOM on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). QCOM sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than QCOM with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 586 stocks and 419 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than QCOM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 28% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half QCOM's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 42% less than QCOM's 42.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.40 for QCOM. INSW earned the most, 56.5% a year, while still swinging less than QCOM (40.5% against 42.8%).
- Among QCOM's popular alternatives, TSM, AAPL and ADI are in the region. TSM earned 31.5% a year against 8.2% a year for QCOM, at 38.5% volatility, 10% less than QCOM's 42.8%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to QCOM; faint dots are 88 more of the 1,005 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than QCOM?
Investments that beat QCOM over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among QCOM's popular alternatives, ADI, TSM and AAPL earned more than QCOM with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 8.2% a year at 42.8%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, APH (automotive electronics theme) and CIBR (cybersecurity) earned more than QCOM with less volatility over the past 5 years. APH returned 33.8% a year at 32.2% volatility, against 8.2% a year at 42.8%.
- Across the whole market, 1,005 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than QCOM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat QCOM over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks QCOM's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than QCOM follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than QCOM's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× QCOM's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than QCOM's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with QCOM?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +8.2% | 42.8% | 0.40 | −44.3% | +239% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.58 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against QCOM. 12 of 22 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.55 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | 0.52 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.49 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Semiconductors and the categories next to it (Semiconductor Equipment, Computer Hardware, Communications Equipment, Software), plus QCOM's specific themes. 45 of 134 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.40 | — | ||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.49 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,626% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.43 | — | ||
SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd · Telecommunications · 5G Networks theme | Similar return, lower volatility | +8.8% | 30.0% | 0.43 | −46.0% | +152% | 0.30 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,377 of 3,477 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.07 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | -0.04 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.06 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.23 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.4% | 26.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | +767% | 0.71 | 0.08% | ||
MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.43 | 0.46% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.33 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for QCOM
- Annual return
- QCOM returned 8.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $14,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- QCOM's volatility over the past 5 years was 42.8%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, QCOM's return lands within 42.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- QCOM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.40, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so QCOM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- QCOM's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 44.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 44.3% fall takes a 79.4% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, QCOM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.58 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against QCOM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a QCOM holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,005 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than QCOM with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with QCOM | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.07 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | -0.04 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.06 | — | |
| 4 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.23 | 0.48% |
| 5 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.02 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +19.4% | 26.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | +767% | 0.71 | 0.08% | |
| 7 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.02 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +12.5% | 31.3% | 0.53 | −37.1% | +303% | 0.07 | — | |
| 9 | MGKVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF · US Large-Cap Growth | Whole market | +13.5% | 23.0% | 0.67 | −36.0% | +464% | 0.62 | 0.05% |
| 10 | EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.35 | — |
| 11 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.64 | 0.59% |
| 12 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.59 | 0.40% |
| 13 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.72 | 0.50% |
| 14 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.23 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.21 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | -0.04 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.13 | — | |
| 18 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 22.8% | 0.77 | −32.3% | +286% | 0.08 | — |
| 19 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.01 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.05 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.26 | 0.06% | |
| 22 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.75 | 0.70% |
| 23 | Whole market | +11.4% | 14.7% | 0.81 | −38.5% | +205% | 0.39 | 0.18% | |
| 24 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | -0.06 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.3% | 0.71 | −34.1% | +293% | 0.52 | 0.15% | |
| 26 | Same or nearby category | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.40 | — | |
| 27 | OEFiShares S&P 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.8% | 0.84 | −31.4% | +367% | 0.60 | 0.20% |
| 28 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | 0.01 | — |
| 29 | DGRWWisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +11.8% | 14.0% | 0.87 | −32.0% | +276% | 0.49 | 0.28% |
| 30 | PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Whole market | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +294% | 0.12 | — |
| 31 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.29 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.00 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.04 | — | |
| 34 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.44 | 0.39% |
| 35 | BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 18.6% | 0.57 | −32.7% | — | 0.47 | 0.19% |
| 36 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.53 | 0.12% |
| 37 | LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +14.1% | 27.5% | 0.62 | −38.9% | +389% | 0.17 | — |
| 38 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.09 | — | |
| 39 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.06 | — |
| 40 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.65 | 0.19% |
| 41 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.72 | 0.40% |
| 42 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.12 | — | |
| 43 | Popular alternative | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.51 | — | |
| 44 | DSIiShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF · US ESG Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.1% | 0.72 | −34.1% | +322% | 0.57 | 0.25% |
| 45 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | 0.17 | — |
| 46 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.37 | 0.20% |
| 47 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | -0.06 | — | |
| 48 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.63 | 0.45% |
| 49 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.14 | — | |
| 50 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.49 | 0.58% |
| 51 | SNPEXtrackers S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.3% | 17.2% | 0.81 | −33.4% | — | 0.56 | 0.10% |
| 52 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.43 | 0.05% |
| 53 | FVFirst Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.7% | 21.1% | 0.55 | −34.0% | +247% | 0.53 | 0.30% |
| 54 | HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +12.6% | 25.8% | 0.59 | −38.7% | +373% | 0.41 | 0.60% |
| 55 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | -0.06 | — | |
| 56 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.05 | — |
| 57 | FBTFirst Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund · Healthcare | Whole market | +10.8% | 22.2% | 0.58 | −33.3% | +203% | 0.27 | 0.55% |
| 58 | QUSState Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.1% | 14.2% | 0.81 | −33.8% | +273% | 0.46 | 0.15% |
| 59 | Same or nearby category | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.38 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | -0.14 | — | |
| 61 | FDLOFidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.8% | 13.0% | 0.79 | −34.4% | +249% | 0.39 | 0.15% |
| 62 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.05 | — | |
| 63 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.66 | 0.50% |
| 64 | FDRRFidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.6% | 15.0% | 0.87 | −36.5% | +265% | 0.52 | 0.15% |
| 65 | EWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.2% | 0.86 | −30.1% | — | 0.29 | 0.15% |
| 66 | CSWCSW Industrials, Inc. · Industrial Products | Whole market | +17.1% | 34.4% | 0.63 | −46.2% | +867% | 0.08 | — |
| 67 | DJDInvesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.8% | 13.3% | 0.91 | −34.7% | +227% | 0.27 | 0.07% |
| 68 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.10 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.01 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | 0.01 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | -0.11 | — | |
| 72 | PJPInvesco Pharmaceuticals ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.2% | 16.6% | 0.72 | −34.0% | +135% | 0.16 | 0.58% |
| 73 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.09 | — |
| 74 | LGHHCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.4% | 16.7% | 0.63 | −29.6% | — | 0.52 | 1.00% |
| 75 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | -0.04 | — |
| 76 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | -0.02 | — | |
| 77 | ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF · US Total Market | Whole market | +12.9% | 22.5% | 0.65 | −35.2% | +453% | 0.64 | 0.21% |
| 78 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.03 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +18.2% | 32.6% | 0.68 | −70.7% | +379% | -0.09 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.12 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | -0.08 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.43 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +26.5% | 32.5% | 0.89 | −77.5% | +433% | 0.00 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | 0.03 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.15 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.29 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.00 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | -0.01 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.24 | — | |
| 90 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.14 | 0.40% |
| 91 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.37 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +18.6% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | +304% | 0.18 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +19.2% | 34.4% | 0.69 | −66.8% | +416% | -0.12 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.29 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.05 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.24 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +14.1% | 30.1% | 0.59 | −54.7% | +513% | 0.10 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.26 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +510% | 0.22 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.06 | — |
QCOM against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against QCOM, compared period by period and year by year.
How do QCOM's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at QCOM, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Five of the 22 popular alternatives, led by TSM, ADI and AAPL, were both more rewarding and calmer than QCOM over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, QCOM returned 8.2% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (42.8% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than QCOM with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | +35.7% | 57.6% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | +32.0% | 47.3% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | +29.5% | 65.2% |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | +28.0% | 55.1% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | +19.5% | 34.1% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | +18.4% | 28.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | +12.4% | 55.6% |
| SMTC Semtech Corporation | +11.9% | 67.3% |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | +11.6% | 40.1% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | +10.7% | 55.9% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | +9.9% | 33.7% |
| QCOM This pageQUALCOMM Incorporated | +8.2% | 42.8% |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | +8.1% | 48.3% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | +5.7% | 42.3% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | +2.5% | 45.9% |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | +2.2% | 47.7% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | +1.7% | 35.7% |
| CEVA CEVA, Inc. | −7.7% | 57.6% |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | −7.8% | 54.7% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | −10.8% | 42.9% |
Has QCOM consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares QCOM with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than QCOM helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- 13 of the 23 popular alternatives, led by MRVL, NVDA and AMD, outperformed QCOM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- MRVL, NVDA and AMD outperformed QCOM in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- AAPL, ADI and TXN earned more for the risk they took than QCOM (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than QCOM over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated (this page) | — | −9.5% | +3.7% | +28.9% | +3.2% | +7.4% | +72.4% | +48.3% | +239% | 42.8% | 0.40 | −44.3% | — | $188B | — |
| MRVL QualifiedMarvell Technology, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −6.6% | +23.4% | +62.7% | +169% | +181% | +390% | +264% | +1,874% | 65.2% | 0.72 | −61.9% | — | $211B | — |
| NVDA QualifiedNVIDIA Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| AMD QualifiedAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −13.1% | +6.2% | +94.5% | +139% | +122% | +425% | +359% | +7,583% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | — | $873B | — |
| TSM QualifiedTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| ADI QualifiedAnalog Devices, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +3.7% | +6.9% | +4.8% | +46.3% | +63.3% | +150% | +144% | +652% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | — | $192B | — |
| AAPL QualifiedApple Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +0.2% | +4.0% | +24.6% | +25.6% | +29.9% | +99.0% | +133% | +1,168% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | — | $5.0T | — |
| MTSI QualifiedMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −5.8% | −2.5% | −6.5% | +50.3% | +87.4% | +249% | +302% | +588% | 47.3% | 0.83 | −80.8% | — | $20B | — |
| SIMO QualifiedSilicon Motion Technology Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | −20.6% | −15.2% | +54.7% | +130% | +125% | +320% | +243% | +494% | 55.1% | 0.71 | −56.5% | — | $7.2B | — |
| SMTC QualifiedSemtech Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | −23.2% | +8.2% | +28.6% | +81.0% | +98.7% | +726% | +75.3% | +445% | 67.3% | 0.51 | −85.4% | — | $13B | — |
| TXN QualifiedTexas Instruments Incorporated | 3/5 short3/3 long | +2.6% | −1.7% | +20.1% | +59.1% | +58.7% | +105% | +60.5% | +424% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | — | $254B | — |
| ON QualifiedON Semiconductor Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | +5.4% | −12.8% | −11.6% | +33.4% | +37.8% | −10.9% | +66.0% | +540% | 55.9% | 0.46 | −70.4% | — | $29B | — |
| SLAB QualifiedSilicon Laboratories Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +0.1% | +1.7% | +3.3% | +67.6% | +60.8% | +115% | +47.7% | +277% | 48.3% | 0.39 | −59.0% | — | $7.4B | — |
| INTC QualifiedIntel Corp. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −24.7% | −5.5% | +39.6% | +133% | +141% | +167% | +79.8% | +219% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | — | $485B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| NOK Communication EquipmentNokia Oyj | 2/5 short2/3 long | −17.5% | −10.2% | −14.3% | +40.3% | +60.8% | +211% | +72.8% | +123% | 40.1% | 0.47 | −62.6% | — | $49B | — |
| ERIC Communication EquipmentTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 4/5 short1/3 long | +5.5% | +12.9% | −8.0% | +15.6% | +15.6% | +164% | +8.9% | +161% | 35.7% | 0.23 | −66.6% | — | $36B | — |
| STM SemiconductorsSTMicroelectronics N.V. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −11.2% | −25.8% | +3.3% | +68.2% | +52.9% | +18.8% | +11.6% | +525% | 47.7% | 0.28 | −66.6% | — | $41B | — |
| ARM SemiconductorsArm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | 2/5 short1/3 long | −31.5% | −18.0% | +26.2% | +92.7% | +28.9% | +362% | — | — | — | — | −54.0% | — | $236B | — |
| SWKS SemiconductorsSkyworks Solutions, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | −8.4% | +36.0% | +37.9% | +28.9% | +10.2% | −2.8% | −43.5% | +29.2% | 42.9% | -0.05 | −72.9% | — | $12B | — |
| SYNA SemiconductorsSynaptics Incorporated | 4/5 short0/3 long | +23.2% | +3.4% | +41.4% | +55.1% | +61.9% | +29.9% | −33.2% | +72.3% | 54.7% | 0.12 | −85.3% | — | $4.7B | — |
| MCHP SemiconductorsMicrochip Technology Incorporated | 3/5 short0/3 long | +1.4% | −5.2% | −4.6% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +8.5% | +13.0% | +207% | 45.9% | 0.28 | −63.8% | — | $41B | — |
| NXPI SemiconductorsNXP Semiconductors N.V. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +2.2% | −10.7% | +8.2% | +8.8% | +10.0% | +34.9% | +31.9% | +159% | 42.3% | 0.34 | −53.3% | — | $60B | — |
| CEVA SemiconductorsCEVA, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −10.4% | −22.6% | +20.8% | +28.8% | +4.5% | +58.9% | −32.9% | −6.1% | 57.6% | 0.15 | −78.2% | — | $813M | — |
How did QCOM do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where QCOM ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with QCOM and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- QCOM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in ten of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, NVDA came out ahead of QCOM most often, in 18 of the 26 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, QCOM finished in the top quarter in five of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in seven. In 2025, it ranked 13 of 24.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of QCOM; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places QCOM among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of QCOM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM This pageQUALCOMM Incorporated | — | +13.8% | +8.3% | +35.1% | −38.6% | +22.3% | +77.1% | +60.8% | −7.6% | +1.1% | +35.1% | −30.6% | +2.3% | +22.4% | +14.9% | +12.3% | +9.0% | +31.1% | −7.6% | +5.5% | −11.3% | +2.5% | +58.3% | +49.1% | −28.0% | −38.5% | −53.3% | +2,621% | +6.4% | +27.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 29 | 13 of 24 | 14 of 24 | 11 of 23 | 14 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 7 of 23 | 11 of 23 | 12 of 23 | 19 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 21 of 23 | 21 of 23 | 14 of 23 | 8 of 22 | 5 of 22 | 14 of 21 | 18 of 20 | 1 of 20 | 13 of 20 | 16 of 20 | 13 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 14 of 19 | 2 of 17 | 12 of 17 | 13 of 14 | 1 of 13 | 13 of 13 | 4 of 12 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 18 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 13 of 25 | −22.8% | +83.8% | +63.7% | −57.5% | +84.6% | +80.3% | +65.7% | −23.6% | +56.9% | +60.5% | −37.8% | +2.5% | +102% | −46.7% | −25.3% | −10.6% | +211% | −52.3% | −27.1% | −31.6% | +58.1% | +87.1% | +101% | −47.2% | +63.5% | — | — | — | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 18 of 26 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% | +1.6% | +102% | −82.8% | +308% | +39.6% | — | — | — |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +77.3% | −18.1% | +128% | −55.0% | +56.9% | +100.0% | +148% | +79.6% | −9.3% | +295% | +7.5% | −31.0% | +61.3% | −55.6% | −34.0% | −15.5% | +348% | −71.2% | −63.1% | −33.5% | +39.0% | +47.8% | +131% | −59.3% | +14.8% | −4.6% | −0.2% | +63.3% | −31.1% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 19 of 28 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +52.9% | −16.1% | −4.3% | +18.9% | +27.1% | −4.2% | +56.7% | −54.8% | +39.5% | −51.0% | +290% | +13.4% | — |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +29.8% | +8.8% | +23.4% | −4.9% | +21.0% | +26.9% | +41.3% | −1.6% | +25.3% | +35.0% | +2.4% | +12.2% | +24.7% | +21.2% | −2.4% | +22.7% | +71.5% | −38.0% | −1.5% | −6.7% | −1.9% | −18.7% | +91.4% | −46.2% | −13.3% | +10.1% | +197% | +13.3% | +8.9% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 20 of 29 | +9.0% | +30.7% | +49.0% | −26.4% | +34.6% | +82.3% | +89.0% | −5.4% | +48.5% | +12.5% | −3.0% | +40.6% | +8.0% | +32.6% | +25.5% | +53.2% | +147% | −56.9% | +133% | +18.1% | +123% | +201% | +49.1% | −34.6% | +47.2% | −71.1% | +151% | +212% | −37.1% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 9 of 13 | +31.8% | +39.8% | +47.6% | −19.6% | +42.3% | +107% | +83.3% | −55.4% | −29.7% | +13.2% | +30.7% | +84.1% | +13.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 12 of 20 | +76.9% | −8.9% | −4.9% | −30.4% | +102% | −1.8% | +51.7% | −33.1% | +27.1% | +37.6% | +35.4% | +72.5% | +4.6% | −30.5% | +381% | +24.5% | +48.8% | −87.1% | +12.1% | +32.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SMTC Semtech Corporation | 16 of 29 | +19.1% | +182% | −23.6% | −67.7% | +23.4% | +36.3% | +15.3% | +34.1% | +8.4% | +66.8% | −31.4% | +9.1% | −12.7% | +16.6% | +9.6% | +33.1% | +50.9% | −27.4% | +18.8% | −28.4% | −16.4% | −4.0% | +108% | −69.3% | +61.8% | −15.3% | +191% | +83.4% | +129% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 16 of 29 | −4.5% | +13.1% | +6.4% | −9.9% | +17.5% | +31.7% | +39.6% | −7.2% | +46.8% | +36.7% | +5.1% | +25.1% | +46.3% | +7.9% | −8.8% | +27.0% | +72.0% | −52.8% | +17.0% | −9.8% | +30.7% | −15.9% | +96.6% | −46.2% | −40.8% | −1.8% | +126% | +90.7% | +42.3% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 11 of 25 | −14.1% | −24.5% | +33.9% | −8.2% | +108% | +34.3% | +47.7% | −21.1% | +64.1% | +30.2% | −3.3% | +22.9% | +16.9% | −8.7% | −21.9% | +12.0% | +159% | −61.7% | +17.3% | +36.9% | +21.8% | −29.9% | +373% | −33.8% | −60.6% | — | — | — | — |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 11 of 25 | +5.2% | −6.1% | −2.5% | −34.3% | +62.1% | +9.8% | +47.2% | −10.8% | +35.9% | +33.9% | +1.9% | +10.0% | +3.6% | −3.7% | −5.7% | −4.9% | +95.2% | −33.8% | +8.0% | −5.5% | +3.8% | −18.4% | +127% | −43.4% | +134% | — | — | — | — |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 15 of 29 | +84.0% | −59.6% | +94.5% | −46.6% | +6.0% | −14.7% | +30.7% | +4.2% | +30.9% | +8.7% | −2.2% | +44.3% | +30.9% | −12.0% | +19.4% | +6.3% | +43.9% | −43.5% | +34.2% | −17.2% | +8.1% | −26.6% | +107% | −50.3% | +4.9% | −26.9% | +39.1% | +69.0% | +7.4% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 11 of 16 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% | +46.1% | +93.4% | +70.0% | +12.0% | +3.0% | +55.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 13 of 29 | +50.7% | +34.6% | −23.9% | −24.4% | +59.3% | +5.2% | −34.9% | +29.7% | −0.3% | −27.8% | −8.4% | +3.0% | +105% | −11.5% | −50.3% | −16.0% | −14.5% | −58.2% | +93.4% | +13.5% | +20.0% | −6.1% | +12.0% | −36.1% | −43.0% | −8.6% | +219% | +251% | +21.6% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 13 of 29 | +24.0% | +33.5% | +13.2% | −44.4% | −7.2% | +38.3% | +0.1% | +35.2% | +16.7% | −36.4% | −18.1% | +2.3% | +25.5% | +3.4% | −9.5% | +28.7% | +20.9% | −30.3% | −40.7% | +18.8% | +10.6% | +77.8% | +162% | −87.1% | −53.0% | −31.7% | +177% | +29.3% | +24.7% |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 14 of 29 | +5.3% | −49.6% | +41.6% | −26.8% | +32.4% | +38.9% | +96.4% | −35.7% | +95.1% | +76.9% | −6.7% | −2.5% | +15.2% | +30.1% | −40.6% | +15.9% | +43.9% | −52.3% | −21.1% | +2.9% | −6.1% | −28.1% | +39.0% | −38.3% | −26.0% | −15.2% | +288% | +27.8% | −12.7% |
| ARM Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | 1 of 2 | −11.4% | +64.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 13 of 29 | −25.5% | −18.9% | +26.5% | −40.0% | +2.7% | +28.4% | +84.1% | −28.3% | +28.7% | −1.2% | +6.7% | +156% | +40.6% | +25.2% | −43.4% | +102% | +156% | −34.8% | +20.2% | +38.9% | −45.9% | +8.4% | +0.9% | −60.5% | −41.1% | +29.1% | +139% | +123% | +104% |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | 11 of 23 | −3.0% | −33.1% | +19.9% | −67.1% | +200% | +46.6% | +76.8% | −6.8% | −25.5% | −33.3% | +16.7% | +32.9% | +72.9% | −0.6% | +2.6% | −4.1% | +85.1% | −39.6% | +38.6% | +20.1% | −19.2% | +104% | +97.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 16 of 29 | +14.6% | −34.9% | +30.9% | −18.0% | +27.5% | +33.7% | +48.1% | −16.7% | +39.5% | +41.6% | +6.3% | +4.0% | +42.4% | −7.1% | +10.3% | +24.6% | +57.8% | −34.8% | −0.7% | +4.4% | +22.6% | −19.9% | +36.8% | −5.1% | +76.5% | −27.9% | +85.0% | +23.6% | −11.6% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 9 of 15 | +6.4% | −8.0% | +48.4% | −29.2% | +44.8% | +26.6% | +75.7% | −37.0% | +19.5% | +16.3% | +10.3% | +66.3% | +74.5% | +71.2% | −26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CEVA CEVA, Inc. | 11 of 23 | −31.8% | +38.9% | −11.2% | −40.8% | −5.0% | +68.8% | +22.1% | −52.1% | +37.6% | +43.6% | +28.8% | +19.2% | −3.4% | −47.9% | +47.6% | +59.4% | +83.7% | −42.7% | +88.7% | +3.4% | −31.3% | −12.5% | +76.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How QCOM has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were QCOM's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents QCOM's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1991, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of QCOM's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: QCOM fell 64.5% from October 1993 to July 1994, while the S&P 500 slipped only 2.8%.
- The slowest recovery came after QCOM fell 86.7% from January 2000 to August 2002; it did not regain that peak until March 2014, 12 years later.
Green means QCOM fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | QCOM fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −86.7% | −40.7% | Jan 2000 | Aug 2002 | 2.6 years | Mar 2014 | 11.6 years |
| No named crash | −64.5% | −2.8% | Oct 1993 | Jul 1994 | 9 months | Jul 1995 | 12 months |
| No named crash | −53.1% | — | Jan 1992 | Sep 1992 | 8 months | Nov 1992 | 2 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −45.1% | −3.8% | Jul 2014 | Feb 2016 | 19 months | Sep 2018 | 2.6 years |
| 2022 bear market | −44.3% | −20.0% | Dec 2021 | Nov 2022 | 11 months | May 2024 | 18 months |
How did QCOM do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far QCOM, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, AAPL held up best, falling less than QCOM in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- QCOM fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when QCOM fell 84.9% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than QCOM.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM This pageQUALCOMM Incorporated | — | −5.6% | −41.5% | −32.2% | −26.8% | −6.6% | −30.7% | −19.2% | −0.5% | −48.0% | −84.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −12.0% | −56.8% | −31.6% | −26.1% | −7.5% | −37.6% | −23.1% | 0.0% | −74.3% | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 2 of 10 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −3.9% | −60.1% | −34.3% | −48.9% | −9.9% | −40.0% | −41.5% | 0.0% | −87.6% | −93.3% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 6 of 10 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −2.6% | −22.6% | −33.6% | −18.1% | −7.2% | −22.7% | −18.6% | −1.2% | −55.0% | −82.0% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 7 of 10 | −2.9% | −27.4% | −30.7% | −36.5% | −4.8% | −23.4% | −12.5% | −4.3% | −60.9% | −81.2% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −4.8% | −43.9% | −48.1% | −37.0% | −41.5% | −22.4% | — | — | — | — |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 2 of 9 | −7.3% | −38.1% | −36.8% | −40.2% | −12.4% | −19.2% | −30.8% | −1.5% | −92.4% | — |
| SMTC Semtech Corporation | 1 of 10 | −5.5% | −70.8% | −44.9% | −27.8% | −9.3% | −22.7% | −24.5% | −0.8% | −55.8% | −84.7% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 5 of 10 | −2.6% | −21.7% | −29.8% | −19.5% | −9.3% | −18.4% | −21.6% | −1.3% | −61.4% | −85.4% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 2 of 9 | −6.4% | −34.0% | −59.6% | −23.7% | −12.2% | −39.2% | −28.5% | 0.0% | −80.0% | — |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 2 of 9 | −3.4% | −42.9% | −34.8% | −22.7% | −10.1% | −32.0% | −25.2% | −1.9% | −60.6% | — |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 5 of 10 | −1.0% | −54.1% | −33.5% | −13.0% | −6.7% | −19.7% | −16.2% | −0.9% | −55.2% | −82.3% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 5 of 8 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 6 of 10 | −2.1% | −32.1% | −42.4% | −9.7% | −2.8% | −23.3% | −21.1% | 0.0% | −78.1% | −82.1% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 4 of 10 | −2.3% | −53.5% | −31.3% | −13.3% | −7.5% | −19.2% | −31.9% | −0.8% | −71.4% | −98.6% |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 3 of 10 | −3.2% | −40.6% | −49.6% | −31.0% | −9.1% | −31.6% | −36.9% | −3.2% | −77.2% | −83.5% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −3.0% | −50.0% | −43.0% | −32.3% | −5.3% | −38.6% | −37.2% | −3.4% | −66.0% | −95.7% |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | 2 of 9 | −6.7% | −68.3% | −40.4% | −28.7% | −5.1% | −34.1% | −13.9% | −1.1% | −64.4% | — |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 6 of 10 | −3.8% | −35.3% | −49.0% | −25.9% | −14.4% | −18.6% | −12.7% | −0.4% | −55.2% | −58.7% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 3 of 7 | −4.2% | −38.8% | −52.0% | −27.4% | −4.0% | −35.5% | −39.8% | — | — | — |
| CEVA CEVA, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −5.8% | −44.3% | −41.0% | −29.7% | −15.2% | −35.9% | −29.5% | −1.3% | −61.1% | — |
How closely does QCOM move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares QCOM with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 15 of the 22 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than QCOM's 0.83, led by AVGO, TSM and NVDA.
- TSM took just 75% of the S&P 500's losses, against 139% for QCOM, while still keeping 138% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, QCOM captured 115% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 139% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.51. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than QCOM's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM This pageQUALCOMM Incorporated | 115% | 139% | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 137% | 94% | 1.46 | 1.15 |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 167% | 116% | 1.44 | 1.68 |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 254% | 179% | 1.42 | 2.25 |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 117% | 92% | 1.26 | 1.20 |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 122% | 104% | 1.17 | 1.72 |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 126% | 116% | 1.09 | 1.41 |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 113% | 108% | 1.04 | 1.18 |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 98% | 100% | 0.98 | 1.43 |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 148% | 157% | 0.94 | 1.93 |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 161% | 185% | 0.87 | 1.95 |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 113% | 130% | 0.87 | 1.18 |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 63% | 72% | 0.87 | 1.01 |
| SMTC Semtech Corporation | 193% | 240% | 0.81 | 1.99 |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 127% | 170% | 0.75 | 1.72 |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 115% | 157% | 0.73 | 1.63 |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 73% | 108% | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | 117% | 188% | 0.62 | 1.64 |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 88% | 149% | 0.59 | 1.31 |
| CEVA CEVA, Inc. | 63% | 122% | 0.51 | 1.52 |
What diversifies QCOM?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with QCOM's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing QCOM with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in QCOM into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+9.7% for QCOM alone, +16.7% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and PJUL have moved largely independently of QCOM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.47 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in five of the eight calendar years in which QCOM lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which QCOM lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% QCOM and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2008 | 2006 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated (this page) | 1.00 | +48.3% | 0.40 | −38.6% | −7.6% | −30.6% | −7.6% | −11.3% | −28.0% | −38.5% | −53.3% | 44.8% | +9.7% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.14 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 36.2% | +12.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.23 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 36.5% | +14.5% |
| PJUL Broad MarketInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF | 0.47 | +64.4% | 1.20 | −2.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 36.6% | +11.3% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.06 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 36.1% | +12.5% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.08 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | −0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 36.2% | +11.8% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.49 | +62.9% | 0.99 | −5.6% | −4.8% | +4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | 36.7% | +11.3% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.41 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | −9.5% | +4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | 36.8% | +11.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.14 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +4.9% | +22.6% | — | — | — | 36.5% | +13.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2008 | 2006 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated (this page) | 1.00 | +48.3% | 0.40 | −38.6% | −7.6% | −30.6% | −7.6% | −11.3% | −28.0% | −38.5% | −53.3% | 44.8% | +9.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | -0.09 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | −39.6% | −5.8% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 35.8% | +17.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.42 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −20.5% | −26.0% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 42.1% | +28.0% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.21 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −15.2% | +38.9% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 38.7% | +25.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.13 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | −40.4% | −1.2% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 35.6% | +16.7% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.00 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 36.4% | +19.2% |
Common questions
What was QCOM's worst drawdown?
QCOM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1991 was 86.7%, from January 2000 to August 2002. It took about 12 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were QCOM's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, QCOM's best year was 1999, when it returned 2,621%. Its worst was 2000, with a return of -53.3%.
Is there a better investment than QCOM?
Among QCOM's popular alternatives, ADI, TSM and AAPL earned more than QCOM with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 8.2% a year at 42.8%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, APH (automotive electronics theme) and CIBR (cybersecurity) earned more than QCOM with less volatility over the past 5 years. APH returned 33.8% a year at 32.2% volatility, against 8.2% a year at 42.8%.
Is QCOM more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. QCOM's volatility over the past 5 years was 42.8%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, QCOM's return lands within 42.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is QCOM's Sharpe ratio?
QCOM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.40, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so QCOM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is QCOM with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, QCOM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.58 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against QCOM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a QCOM holding.
What are the best alternatives to QCOM?
Of the 23 popular alternatives we compared, 13 outperformed QCOM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: MRVL, NVDA and AMD.
Did QCOM outperform the S&P 500?
QCOM finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in ten of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +13.8%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did QCOM do in stock market crashes?
QCOM fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when QCOM fell 84.9% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies QCOM?
These had a low correlation with QCOM over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.14), DXJ (correlation 0.23) and PJUL (correlation 0.47); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.09), CLS (correlation 0.42) and FIX (correlation 0.21). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than QCOM's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of QCOM's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.