Relative Intelligence · Gold Mining

How Franco-Nevada (FNV) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on FNV alone. It places FNV (Franco-Nevada Corporation) against 12 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where FNV stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: FNV's full trading record, from December 2007 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowFNV has run far ahead of the market, rising 20.7% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the gold mining ETF GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) rose 21.7% over the past 3 months, with WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals, up 27.0%) and RGLD (Royal Gold, up 27.7%), against 3.9% for the S&P 500.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, FNV rose 18.4% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. FNV's 37.1% fall from April 2022 to December 2023 took 16 months to heal. the S&P 500 fell 6.9% over those same dates. By year ↓
- Long termFNV turned $10,000 into $40,300 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, over the past decade, only WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals) of its gold mining peers outpaced FNV. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 33.3% off FNV, against 24.5% for the S&P 500, and less than gold mining peers such as WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals, 43.3%). FNV fell further than the S&P 500 in two of the last three sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (33.3% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationFNV is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.18 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.18 with the total US market, less closely than 89% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, FNV's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.49: 69% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 47% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) earned more than FNV with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.7% a year at 18.9% volatility, against 12.5% a year at 31.2%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- RTX (aerospace & defense) and RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum, metals & mining) earned more than FNV with less volatility over the past 5 years. RTX returned 18.6% a year at 24.3% volatility, against 12.5% a year at 31.2%.
- Whole market
- 265 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than FNV with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), WMT (Walmart) and JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.).
How much would $10,000 in FNV have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in FNV over the past 18 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of FNV over the same span and FNV's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: FNV began trading on December 7, 2007, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust. It covers the most recent 18 years of FNV's record, starting at the end of September 2008.
- $10,000 invested in FNV at the end of September 2008 would have grown to $156,549 by September 2026, more than the $91,104 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of FNV, and AAPL finished highest, at $979,453.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2008 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 239 of the 1,883 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of FNV; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$979,453+9,695% total · +29.0% a year
- MNST$330,332+3,203% total · +21.4% a year
- V$266,572+2,566% total · +20.0% a year
- WPM$198,701+1,887% total · +18.1% a year
- MCK$182,713+1,727% total · +17.5% a year
- FNV$156,549+1,465% total · +16.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$91,104+811% total · +13.1% a year
- RGLD$80,518+705% total · +12.3% a year
- AU$51,004+410% total · +9.5% a year
- NEM$42,892+329% total · +8.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 872 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of FNV; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AU$67,300+573% total · +46.4% a year
- AEM$39,659+297% total · +31.7% a year
- WPM$37,572+276% total · +30.3% a year
- TFPM$35,993+260% total · +29.2% a year
- OR$32,275+223% total · +26.4% a year
- RGLD$26,119+161% total · +21.2% a year
- NEM$24,375+144% total · +19.5% a year
- GLD$23,190+132% total · +18.3% a year
- FNV$19,236+92.4% total · +14.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
FNV at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: FNV began trading on December 7, 2007, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust.
- FNV's deepest decline since it began trading in 2007 was 58.8%, from July to October 2008. It took five months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 18 full calendar years, FNV's best was 2025, when it returned 77.8%, and its worst was 2013, when it lost 27.5%. It lost money in five of those years.
- FNV is 13.7% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $47B
- Industry
- Gold
- Price history from
- December 2007
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +18.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +78.8%+21.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- +79.9%+12.5% a year
- Past 10 years
- +303%+14.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +77.8%2025
- Worst calendar year
- −27.5%2013
- Losing years
- 5 of 18full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 31.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.53return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −58.8%Jul 2008 to Oct 2008
- From its all-time high
- −13.7%below the peak
FNV against the whole market
Where FNV ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does FNV rank among all stocks?
This section ranks FNV on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how FNV stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- FNV's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 4% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | FNV | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +18.4% | 1,298 of 3,287 | top 39% |
| 3-year return | +78.8% | 1,142 of 3,017 | top 38% |
| 5-year return | +79.9% | 812 of 2,893 | top 28% |
| 10-year return | +303% | 581 of 2,202 | top 26% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 31.3% | 844 of 2,893 | top 29% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.53 | 846 of 2,893 | top 29% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −37.1% | 88 of 2,187 | top 4% |
What has beaten FNV on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). FNV sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than FNV with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 154 stocks and 111 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than FNV over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 7% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half FNV's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 21% less than FNV's 31.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.53 for FNV.
- Among FNV's popular alternatives, GLD is in the region. GLD earned 17.7% a year against 12.5% a year for FNV, at 18.9% volatility, 39% less than FNV's 31.2%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to FNV; faint dots are 91 more of the 265 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than FNV?
Investments that beat FNV over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among FNV's popular alternatives, GLD earned more than FNV with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.7% a year at 18.9% volatility, against 12.5% a year at 31.2%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RTX (aerospace & defense) and RS (metals & mining) earned more than FNV with less volatility over the past 5 years. RTX returned 18.6% a year at 24.3% volatility, against 12.5% a year at 31.2%.
- Across the whole market, 265 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than FNV with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, WMT and JPM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat FNV over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks FNV's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than FNV follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than FNV's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× FNV's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than FNV's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with FNV?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +12.5% | 31.3% | 0.53 | −37.1% | +303% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.18 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 5 shownThe investments people most often weigh against FNV. 5 of 11 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.77 | 0.40% | ||
RGLDRoyal Gold, Inc. · Gold Mining | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +20.6% | 32.4% | 0.74 | −49.5% | +282% | 0.83 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +40.4% | 49.9% | 0.93 | −66.3% | +681% | 0.82 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +510% | 0.83 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +18.6% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | +304% | 0.72 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Gold Mining and Metals & Mining and the categories next to it (Gold, Silver, Aerospace & Defense), plus FNV's specific themes. 27 of 82 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.22 | — | ||
RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.09 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.49 | — | ||
MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.10 | — | |
AERAerCap Holdings N.V. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +18.4% | 31.5% | 0.70 | −75.9% | +263% | 0.11 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | +12.9% | 20.8% | 0.69 | −51.6% | +184% | 0.20 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 648 of 3,541 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.35 | — | ||
DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.45 | 0.27% | |
AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.26 | 0.15% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.14 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.09 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for FNV
- Annual return
- FNV returned 12.5% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $18,000. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- FNV's volatility over the past 5 years was 31.2%, 1.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, FNV's return lands within 31.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- FNV's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.53, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so FNV earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- FNV's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 37.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 37.1% fall takes a 59.0% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, FNV's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.18 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against FNV instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a FNV holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 265 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than FNV with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with FNV | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.23 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.25 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.35 | — | |
| 4 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.45 | 0.27% |
| 5 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.26 | 0.15% |
| 6 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.14 | — | |
| 7 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.18 | 0.40% |
| 8 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.04 | — | |
| 9 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.28 | — |
| 10 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.09 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.17 | — | |
| 12 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.07 | 0.15% |
| 13 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.33 | — | |
| 14 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.20 | 0.45% |
| 15 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.26 | — | |
| 16 | EWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.2% | 0.86 | −30.1% | — | 0.47 | 0.15% |
| 17 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.25 | 0.48% |
| 18 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.41 | 0.40% |
| 19 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.30 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.19 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.35 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.09 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.25 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.32 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.26 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.16 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.02 | 0.09% | |
| 28 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.16 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.07 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.14 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.23 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.29 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.10 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.16 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.19 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.10 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.23 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.27 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | -0.01 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | -0.01 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.22 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.11 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.31 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.19 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.21 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +18.1% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | +312% | 0.10 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.51 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.21 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.08 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.09 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.36 | — | |
| 52 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.21 | — |
| 53 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.32 | — | |
| 54 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.25 | 0.80% |
| 55 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.33 | — |
| 56 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.46 | 0.25% |
| 57 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.10 | — | |
| 58 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.09 | — |
| 59 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.06 | — |
| 60 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | 0.14 | — |
| 61 | PBAPembina Pipeline Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +13.8% | 21.5% | 0.71 | −70.9% | +172% | 0.41 | — |
| 62 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.29 | 0.56% |
| 63 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.06 | — |
| 64 | WESWestern Midstream Partners, LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +23.5% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | +128% | 0.08 | — |
| 65 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.54 | 0.36% |
| 66 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.24 | — |
| 67 | RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated · Insurance | Whole market | +19.7% | 27.3% | 0.80 | −65.8% | +199% | 0.08 | — |
| 68 | Same or nearby category | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.22 | — | |
| 69 | BSACBanco Santander-Chile · Banks | Whole market | +19.5% | 29.0% | 0.76 | −63.9% | +154% | 0.25 | — |
| 70 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.20 | 0.59% |
| 71 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.30 | 0.39% |
| 72 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.02 | 0.58% |
| 73 | ARMKAramark · Food Services | Whole market | +17.9% | 28.5% | 0.72 | −72.3% | +137% | 0.11 | — |
| 74 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.39 | 0.43% |
| 75 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.23 | 0.12% |
| 76 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.22 | 0.15% |
| 77 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.20 | — |
| 78 | WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +15.3% | 28.4% | 0.65 | −44.1% | +539% | 0.15 | — |
| 79 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.13 | — |
| 80 | BPOPPopular, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +17.7% | 29.7% | 0.70 | −59.0% | +448% | 0.04 | — |
| 81 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.11 | — |
| 82 | AIQGlobal X - Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF · Artificial Intelligence | Whole market | +14.8% | 26.7% | 0.65 | −44.6% | — | 0.11 | 0.68% |
| 83 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.02 | — |
| 84 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.15 | — |
| 85 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.19 | 0.19% |
| 86 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.06 | 0.40% |
| 87 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Same or nearby category | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.09 | — |
| 88 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.10 | 0.40% |
| 89 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.02 | 0.13% |
| 90 | PSMTPriceSmart, Inc. · Discount Retail | Whole market | +18.6% | 28.2% | 0.75 | −53.2% | +124% | 0.29 | — |
| 91 | GHCGraham Holdings Company · Industrial Conglomerates | Whole market | +17.4% | 26.3% | 0.74 | −62.5% | +191% | 0.25 | — |
| 92 | CNOCNO Financial Group, Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +18.8% | 28.1% | 0.76 | −63.8% | +342% | 0.10 | — |
| 93 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Whole market | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +186% | 0.30 | 0.45% |
| 94 | OEFiShares S&P 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.8% | 0.84 | −31.4% | +367% | 0.13 | 0.20% |
| 95 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.22 | — |
| 96 | EUFNiShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF · Financial Sector Equity | Whole market | +18.5% | 21.8% | 0.89 | −53.2% | +233% | 0.30 | 0.49% |
| 97 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · International | Whole market | +17.3% | 22.8% | 0.82 | −40.5% | — | 0.30 | 0.49% |
| 98 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.20 | — |
| 99 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.09 | — |
| 100 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.32 | 0.05% |
FNV against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against FNV, compared period by period and year by year.
How do FNV's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at FNV, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only GLD was both more rewarding and calmer than FNV over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, FNV returned 12.5% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (31.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than FNV with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| AU AngloGold Ashanti Plc | +40.4% | 49.9% |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | +29.5% | 38.4% |
| TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. | +29.3% | 37.7% |
| WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | +27.5% | 36.9% |
| OR OR Royalties Inc. | +24.4% | 36.7% |
| RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | +20.6% | 32.4% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | +18.6% | 39.1% |
| GLD SPDR Gold Shares | +17.7% | 18.9% |
| PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | +13.6% | 48.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| FNV This pageFranco-Nevada Corporation | +12.5% | 31.3% |
| VOXR Vox Royalty Corp. | +10.9% | 47.3% |
| GROY Gold Royalty Corp. | −11.1% | 55.4% |
Has FNV consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares FNV with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than FNV helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Two of the 12 popular alternatives, NEM and RGLD, outperformed FNV in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- GLD and TFPM earned more for the risk they took than FNV (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than FNV over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation (this page) | — | −7.9% | +20.7% | −6.2% | +16.2% | +18.4% | +78.8% | +79.9% | +303% | 31.3% | 0.53 | −37.1% | — | $47B | — |
| NEM QualifiedNewmont Corporation | 4/5 short2/3 long | −5.1% | +31.2% | +2.2% | +16.1% | +24.3% | +219% | +135% | +304% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | — | $123B | — |
| RGLD QualifiedRoyal Gold, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −4.3% | +27.7% | −9.4% | +8.7% | +24.0% | +124% | +155% | +282% | 32.4% | 0.74 | −49.5% | — | $20B | — |
| AU GoldAngloGold Ashanti Plc | 2/5 short3/3 long | −10.9% | +22.1% | −13.1% | +9.9% | +26.2% | +416% | +445% | +681% | 49.9% | 0.93 | −66.3% | — | $46B | — |
| WPM GoldWheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −11.1% | +27.0% | −11.8% | +11.8% | +25.2% | +212% | +236% | +510% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | — | $60B | — |
| AEM GoldAgnico Eagle Mines Limited | 2/5 short3/3 long | −5.7% | +36.9% | −13.5% | +10.0% | +5.3% | +293% | +264% | +352% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | — | $94B | — |
| OR GoldOR Royalties Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −3.5% | +24.2% | −18.3% | −0.7% | −6.7% | +189% | +198% | +283% | 36.7% | 0.78 | −61.9% | — | $6.5B | — |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 1/5 short2/3 long | −5.2% | +2.7% | −14.6% | −5.2% | −6.3% | +106% | +126% | +213% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | 0.40% | $143B | — |
| TFPM Other Precious MetalsTriple Flag Precious Metals Corp. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −6.3% | +12.3% | −14.8% | −5.9% | −3.3% | +145% | +262% | — | 37.7% | 0.87 | −36.2% | — | $6.3B | — |
| PAAS GoldPan American Silver Corp. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −9.1% | +5.3% | −24.0% | −12.4% | +13.9% | +205% | +89.0% | +202% | 48.9% | 0.51 | −66.7% | — | $18B | — |
| GROY GoldGold Royalty Corp. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −10.1% | +16.3% | −23.1% | −28.2% | −20.2% | +122% | −44.5% | — | 55.4% | 0.06 | −82.0% | — | $679M | — |
| VOXR Other Precious MetalsVox Royalty Corp. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −11.5% | +18.8% | −12.1% | +6.7% | +10.0% | +161% | +68.0% | — | 47.3% | 0.46 | −45.9% | — | $343M | — |
| ELE Other Precious MetalsElemental Royalty Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −23.9% | +13.4% | −18.8% | +5.0% | +12.3% | — | — | — | — | — | −40.9% | — | $1.2B | — |
How did FNV do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2008, along with where FNV ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with FNV and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: FNV began trading on December 7, 2007, so the table starts with 2008, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, FNV finished in the top quarter in nine of 18 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 12.
- Among its popular alternatives, VOXR came out ahead of FNV most often, in four of the five years both traded.
- FNV finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 12 of its 18 full calendar years.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of FNV; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places FNV among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of FNV | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNV This pageFranco-Nevada Corporation | — | +77.8% | +7.4% | −17.9% | −0.4% | +11.3% | +22.3% | +48.9% | −11.0% | +35.5% | +32.4% | −5.3% | +22.6% | −27.6% | +51.8% | +15.3% | +24.9% | +56.8% | +15.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 18 | 10 of 12 | 10 of 12 | 11 of 12 | 5 of 12 | 2 of 10 | 6 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 7 of 9 | 1 of 9 | 7 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 2 of 8 | 1 of 8 | 1 of 8 | 2 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 2 of 8 | 2 of 8 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 18 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 7 of 18 | +173% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −20.8% | +7.4% | +40.3% | +30.5% | −6.2% | +10.9% | +90.1% | −4.4% | −17.2% | −48.5% | −20.4% | −0.6% | +31.0% | +17.3% | −15.9% |
| RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 8 of 18 | +70.4% | +10.4% | +8.7% | +8.5% | 0.0% | −12.1% | +44.3% | +5.5% | +31.3% | +76.7% | −41.1% | +37.8% | −42.3% | +21.6% | +24.4% | +16.7% | −3.6% | +62.9% |
| AU AngloGold Ashanti Plc | 6 of 18 | +288% | +25.5% | −2.7% | −5.1% | −4.9% | +1.9% | +78.8% | +24.1% | −2.2% | +48.1% | −18.4% | −25.8% | −62.4% | −24.9% | −13.1% | +23.1% | +45.6% | −32.0% |
| WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 9 of 18 | +111% | +15.2% | +27.9% | −7.6% | +4.2% | +41.8% | +54.7% | −10.0% | +16.1% | +57.1% | −38.2% | +1.9% | −43.0% | +25.9% | −25.4% | +160% | +131% | −61.8% |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 8 of 18 | +120% | +46.0% | +9.0% | +1.1% | −22.8% | +16.2% | +54.2% | −11.5% | +10.5% | +61.2% | +6.8% | −4.7% | −48.3% | +47.1% | −52.1% | +42.5% | +5.6% | −5.8% |
| OR OR Royalties Inc. | 4 of 11 | +96.9% | +28.3% | +19.8% | −0.1% | −2.0% | +32.6% | +12.3% | −22.7% | +20.4% | 0.0% | −29.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 5 of 18 | +63.7% | +26.7% | +12.7% | −0.8% | −4.2% | +24.8% | +17.9% | −1.9% | +12.8% | +8.0% | −10.7% | −2.2% | −28.3% | +6.6% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +24.0% | +4.9% |
| TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. | 4 of 4 | +123% | +14.6% | −1.8% | +15.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | 8 of 18 | +160% | +26.6% | +2.6% | −33.0% | −26.8% | +46.8% | +63.9% | −5.2% | +3.7% | +133% | −27.2% | −18.2% | −35.1% | −13.3% | −46.9% | +73.7% | +39.5% | −51.1% |
| GROY Gold Royalty Corp. | 1 of 4 | +234% | −17.7% | −36.4% | −51.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VOXR Vox Royalty Corp. | 4 of 5 | +106% | +15.7% | −9.6% | −14.8% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How FNV has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were FNV's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents FNV's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2007, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: FNV began trading on December 7, 2007, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of FNV's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: FNV fell 46.6% from October 2012 to June 2013, while the S&P 500 rose 9.3%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 16 months, after FNV fell 37.1% from April 2022 to December 2023.
Green means FNV fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | FNV fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −58.8% | −31.2% | Jul 2008 | Oct 2008 | 3 months | Mar 2009 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −46.6% | +9.3% | Oct 2012 | Jun 2013 | 8 months | Aug 2014 | 14 months |
| 2022 bear market | −37.1% | +6.9% | Apr 2022 | Dec 2023 | 20 months | Apr 2025 | 16 months |
| No named crash | −34.8% | +22.3% | Jul 2020 | Mar 2021 | 8 months | Mar 2022 | 12 months |
| No named crash | −34.3% | +10.0% | Aug 2014 | Jul 2015 | 11 months | Feb 2016 | 7 months |
How did FNV do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far FNV, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: FNV began trading on December 7, 2007, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust or the 2008 financial crisis. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, GLD held up best, falling less than FNV in all eight crashes they both traded through.
- FNV began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but seven of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was GLD's 29.4%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
- FNV fell less than the S&P 500 in four of the eight crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the late-2018 sell-off, when FNV fell 7.8% and the S&P 500 fell 19.3%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than FNV.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNV This pageFranco-Nevada Corporation | — | −1.8% | −33.3% | −26.9% | −7.8% | −7.0% | −20.8% | −24.4% | −0.9% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 8 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 5 of 8 | −1.0% | −51.8% | −24.5% | −9.5% | −6.0% | −20.2% | −12.0% | −2.3% | −61.5% | −53.0% |
| RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 2 of 8 | 0.0% | −40.7% | −36.8% | −9.8% | −7.5% | −54.7% | −22.8% | −2.4% | −41.7% | −39.3% |
| AU AngloGold Ashanti Plc | 3 of 8 | −0.3% | −51.7% | −37.1% | −10.7% | −9.4% | −36.9% | −15.3% | 0.0% | −71.5% | −50.6% |
| WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 2 of 8 | 0.0% | −43.3% | −28.7% | −14.8% | −10.0% | −29.0% | −28.8% | 0.0% | −86.8% | — |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 5 of 8 | 0.0% | −42.0% | −31.6% | −11.6% | −6.4% | −20.2% | −18.9% | −0.4% | −72.9% | −42.4% |
| OR OR Royalties Inc. | 1 of 6 | 0.0% | −35.4% | −50.5% | −14.2% | −6.7% | −27.2% | — | — | — | — |
| GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 8 of 8 | 0.0% | −21.0% | −12.5% | −2.7% | −1.5% | −11.7% | −15.4% | −0.2% | −29.4% | — |
| TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. | 0 of 2 | −1.7% | −36.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | 2 of 8 | 0.0% | −51.0% | −53.5% | −18.9% | −5.8% | −34.2% | −24.4% | −1.1% | −78.1% | −46.0% |
| GROY Gold Royalty Corp. | 0 of 2 | −2.0% | −56.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VOXR Vox Royalty Corp. | 0 of 2 | −4.9% | −32.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does FNV move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares FNV with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, FNV captured 69% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 47% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.49. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Four of the eight popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than FNV's 1.48, led by GLD, AU and WPM.
- WPM took just 37% of the S&P 500's losses, against 47% for FNV, while still keeping 78% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than FNV's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNV This pageFranco-Nevada Corporation | 69% | 47% | 1.48 | 0.49 |
| GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 40% | 3% | 12.41 | 0.14 |
| AU AngloGold Ashanti Plc | 88% | 40% | 2.19 | 0.61 |
| WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 78% | 37% | 2.09 | 0.48 |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 68% | 45% | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 77% | 57% | 1.34 | 0.70 |
| RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 69% | 54% | 1.28 | 0.56 |
| OR OR Royalties Inc. | 82% | 75% | 1.09 | 0.73 |
| PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | 95% | 111% | 0.85 | 1.00 |
What diversifies FNV?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with FNV's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing FNV with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in FNV into CAH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+14.0% for FNV alone, +20.0% for the mix).
- FIX made money in five of the five calendar years in which FNV lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of FNV over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.41 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which FNV lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% FNV and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2013 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +79.9% | 0.53 | −17.9% | −0.4% | −11.0% | −5.3% | −27.6% | 31.7% | +14.0% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.41 | +119% | 1.48 | +17.4% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | 26.2% | +15.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.25 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +41.3% | 26.1% | +17.3% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.33 | +101% | 1.04 | +8.0% | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | +16.6% | 26.5% | +15.0% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.46 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +1.8% | +7.1% | −3.0% | −0.3% | +23.8% | 26.8% | +14.3% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.04 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +33.4% | 26.5% | +20.3% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.33 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | −5.1% | −9.5% | +4.1% | +26.4% | 26.2% | +14.7% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.02 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | — | 25.8% | +16.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.27 | +177% | 0.93 | −0.6% | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | +26.3% | 27.3% | +16.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2013 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +79.9% | 0.53 | −17.9% | −0.4% | −11.0% | −5.3% | −27.6% | 31.7% | +14.0% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | -0.04 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +66.0% | 25.7% | +20.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.16 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +27.6% | 26.2% | +33.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | -0.04 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | +61.7% | 26.5% | +29.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.25 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +67.7% | 27.1% | +18.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.22 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +48.6% | 27.5% | +21.7% |
Common questions
What was FNV's worst drawdown?
FNV's deepest decline since it began trading in 2007 was 58.8%, from July to October 2008. It took five months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because FNV launched in December 2007, that record does not include the dot-com bust.
What were FNV's best and worst years?
Over 18 full calendar years, FNV's best year was 2025, when it returned 77.8%. Its worst was 2013, with a return of -27.5%.
Is there a better investment than FNV?
Among FNV's popular alternatives, GLD earned more than FNV with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.7% a year at 18.9% volatility, against 12.5% a year at 31.2%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RTX (aerospace & defense) and RS (metals & mining) earned more than FNV with less volatility over the past 5 years. RTX returned 18.6% a year at 24.3% volatility, against 12.5% a year at 31.2%.
Is FNV more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. FNV's volatility over the past 5 years was 31.2%, 1.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, FNV's return lands within 31.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is FNV's Sharpe ratio?
FNV's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.53, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so FNV earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is FNV with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, FNV's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.18 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against FNV instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a FNV holding.
What are the best alternatives to FNV?
Of the 12 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed FNV in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: NEM and RGLD.
Did FNV outperform the S&P 500?
FNV finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 12 of 18 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +77.8%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did FNV do in stock market crashes?
FNV fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the eight major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the late-2018 sell-off, when FNV fell 7.8% and the S&P 500 fell 19.3%.
What diversifies FNV?
These had a low correlation with FNV over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.41), DXJ (correlation 0.25) and EMLP (correlation 0.33); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.04), CLS (correlation -0.16) and FIX (correlation -0.04). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than FNV's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of FNV's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.