Relative Intelligence · Biotechnology

How Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on VRTX alone. It places VRTX (Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where VRTX stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: VRTX's full trading record, from July 1991 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowVRTX has outpaced the market, rising 17.2% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its biotechnology peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from BIIB (Biogen, up 32.6%) to ARGX (argenx, up 4.2%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?VRTX rose 7.1% over the past 3 months, 5.6 points ahead of the biotechnology ETF XBI (State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF), which rose 1.5%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its biotechnology peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: AMGN (Amgen) rose 21.2%, while ALNY (Alnylam Pharmaceuticals) fell 15.4%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsA ahead of 87% of stocks worth at least $300 million over 10 years, but behind 55% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 3 years. Even so, over the past year, VRTX rose 22.8% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. Market rank ↓
- Long termVRTX turned $10,000 into $62,100 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. VRTX's 10-year return of 521% puts it ahead of 87% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashVRTX fell harder than the S&P 500 in five of seven sell-offs. The 2022 bear market was the exception: VRTX fell 19.2%, less than the S&P 500's 24.5%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationVRTX is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.17 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.16 with the total US market, less closely than 89% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years VRTX kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 87% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 50% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.46. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) earned more for the risk it took than VRTX over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 34.5%, against 41.6% for VRTX.
- Nearby categories and themes
- ABBV (AbbVie, pharmaceuticals) earned more than VRTX with less volatility over the past 5 years: 26.1% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 22.6% a year at 29.1%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 16 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than VRTX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them XOM (Exxonmobil), ABBV (AbbVie) and HSBC.
How much would $10,000 in VRTX have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in VRTX over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of VRTX over the same span and VRTX's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in VRTX at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $276,941 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of VRTX, and GILD finished highest, at $1,571,438.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 223 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of VRTX; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- GILD$2M+15,614% total · +19.1% a year
- DHR$777,394+7,674% total · +16.2% a year
- REGN$683,800+6,738% total · +15.7% a year
- AMGN$526,909+5,169% total · +14.6% a year
- LLY$396,376+3,864% total · +13.5% a year
- BIIB$323,632+3,136% total · +12.7% a year
- VRTX$276,941+2,669% total · +12.1% a year
- TMO$235,386+2,254% total · +11.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- INCY$57,786+478% total · +6.2% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 370 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of VRTX; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- TEVA$40,657+307% total · +32.4% a year
- XOM$32,965+230% total · +26.9% a year
- UTHR$29,358+194% total · +24.0% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- VRTX$28,822+188% total · +23.6% a year
- EXEL$27,629+176% total · +22.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- PTCT$17,410+74.1% total · +11.7% a year
VRTX at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- VRTX's deepest decline since it began trading in 1991 was 91.8%, from November 2000 to November 2003. It took about 11 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, VRTX's best was 2000, when it returned 309%, and its worst was 2001, when it lost 65.6%. It lost money in 11 of those years.
- VRTX is 7.8% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $130B
- Industry
- Biotechnology
- Price history from
- July 1991
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +22.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +42.2%+12.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +177%+22.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +521%+20.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +309%2000
- Worst calendar year
- −65.6%2001
- Losing years
- 11 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 29.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.85return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −91.8%Nov 2000 to Nov 2003
- From its all-time high
- −7.8%below the peak
VRTX against the whole market
Where VRTX ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does VRTX rank among all stocks?
This section ranks VRTX on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how VRTX stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), VRTX ranks in the top 8% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | VRTX | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +22.8% | 1,160 of 3,287 | top 35% |
| 3-year return | +42.2% | 1,664 of 3,017 | bottom 46% |
| 5-year return | +177% | 373 of 2,893 | top 13% |
| 10-year return | +521% | 290 of 2,202 | top 13% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 29.1% | 643 of 2,893 | top 22% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.85 | 223 of 2,893 | top 8% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −41.6% | 192 of 2,187 | top 9% |
What has beaten VRTX on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). VRTX sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than VRTX with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 14 stocks and two ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than VRTX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half VRTX's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 15% less than VRTX's 29.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.85 for VRTX.
- None of VRTX's popular alternatives made it, but ABBV (pharmaceuticals) did: 26.1% a year at 23.4% volatility, 20% less than VRTX's 29.1%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to VRTX; faint dots are 11 more of the 16 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than VRTX?
Investments that beat VRTX over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among VRTX's popular alternatives, LLY earned more for the risk it took than VRTX over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 34.5%, against 41.6% for VRTX.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ABBV (pharmaceuticals) earned more than VRTX with less volatility over the past 5 years: 26.1% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 22.6% a year at 29.1%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 16 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than VRTX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them XOM, ABBV and HSBC.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat VRTX over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks VRTX's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than VRTX follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than VRTX's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× VRTX's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than VRTX's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with VRTX?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.17 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against VRTX. 3 of 24 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.32 | — | ||
EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return in most periods | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +448% | 0.10 | — | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.27 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 3 shownEverything else in Biotechnology and the categories next to it (Pharmaceuticals, Life Sciences Tools, Contract Research), plus VRTX's specific themes. 3 of 77 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +32.2% | 42.8% | 0.86 | −85.5% | −3.6% | -0.11 | — | ||
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return in most periods | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +1,196% | 0.16 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 115 of 3,532 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.14 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.33 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.16 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | -0.03 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.19 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return in most periods | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.07 | 0.09% | ||
| On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatility | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.20 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for VRTX
- Annual return
- VRTX returned 22.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $27,700. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- VRTX's volatility over the past 5 years was 29.1%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, VRTX's return lands within 29.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- VRTX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.85, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so VRTX earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- VRTX's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 41.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 41.6% fall takes a 71.2% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, VRTX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.17 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against VRTX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a VRTX holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 16 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than VRTX with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with VRTX | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.29 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.14 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.33 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.07 | — | |
| 5 | Same or nearby category | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.25 | — | |
| 6 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.15 | — |
| 7 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.40 | — | |
| 8 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.18 | — |
| 9 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.11 | — |
| 10 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.07 | — | |
| 11 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.19 | 0.48% |
| 12 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.30 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.21 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.25 | — | |
| 15 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | -0.09 | — |
| 16 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.25 | 0.59% |
VRTX against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against VRTX, compared period by period and year by year.
How do VRTX's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at VRTX, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only GILD was both more rewarding and calmer than VRTX over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- 17 of the 24 popular alternatives earned less than VRTX over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, VRTX returned 22.6% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (29.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than VRTX with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | +40.7% | 32.8% |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | +24.4% | 35.8% |
| ARGX argenx SE | +24.1% | 39.9% |
| UTHR United Therapeutics Corporation | +23.6% | 35.1% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | +22.8% | 24.9% |
| VRTX This pageVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | +22.6% | 29.1% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | +19.6% | 24.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | +12.2% | 30.1% |
| PTCT PTC Therapeutics, Inc. | +11.9% | 55.0% |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +8.3% | 43.9% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +7.7% | 31.1% |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | +6.6% | 33.2% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | +2.9% | 27.8% |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +2.5% | 50.9% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | +1.3% | 34.7% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | −1.8% | 34.7% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | −3.8% | 29.1% |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | −4.0% | 39.1% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | −5.6% | 33.0% |
| CRSP CRISPR Therapeutics AG | −12.7% | 60.9% |
| BNTX BioNTech SE | −19.3% | 52.6% |
| BEAM Beam Therapeutics Inc. | −23.3% | 75.0% |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | −24.8% | 70.3% |
| RARE Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. | −26.9% | 58.4% |
| NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | −38.0% | 78.0% |
Has VRTX consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares VRTX with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than VRTX helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- LLY outperformed VRTX in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 24 popular alternatives, LLY and EXEL, outperformed VRTX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- LLY and GILD earned more for the risk they took than VRTX (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than VRTX over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (this page) | — | +0.8% | +7.1% | +17.2% | +13.8% | +22.8% | +42.2% | +177% | +521% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | — | $130B | — |
| LLY QualifiedEli Lilly and Company | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +10.2% | +12.1% | +40.0% | +19.4% | +59.7% | +124% | +451% | +1,807% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | — | $1.2T | — |
| EXEL QualifiedExelixis, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +12.5% | +16.0% | +47.6% | +47.8% | +86.4% | +205% | +198% | +448% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | — | $16B | — |
| UTHR BiotechnologyUnited Therapeutics Corporation | 2/5 short2/3 long | +12.3% | +4.6% | −3.4% | +11.5% | +28.0% | +146% | +188% | +390% | 35.1% | 0.78 | −55.6% | — | $24B | — |
| PTCT BiotechnologyPTC Therapeutics, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −3.6% | −19.3% | −13.0% | −18.0% | −8.0% | +171% | +75.4% | +796% | 55.0% | 0.48 | −73.8% | — | $5.3B | — |
| ARGX Biotechnologyargenx SE | 0/5 short2/3 long | −12.0% | +2.8% | +4.2% | +3.5% | +2.4% | +83.1% | +194% | — | 39.9% | 0.74 | −38.2% | — | $54B | — |
| TMO Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchThermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +4.3% | +30.7% | +30.9% | +16.3% | +26.8% | +49.5% | +15.1% | +366% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | — | $254B | — |
| AMGN Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAmgen Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +11.6% | +21.2% | +27.0% | +36.7% | +48.7% | +72.2% | +145% | +266% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | — | $237B | — |
| IQV Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchIQVIA Holdings Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −0.8% | +31.4% | +51.5% | +18.8% | +26.3% | +45.3% | +6.5% | +260% | 34.7% | 0.21 | −51.5% | — | $44B | — |
| GILD Drug Manufacturers - GeneralGilead Sciences, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +4.0% | +18.2% | +16.6% | +31.0% | +30.3% | +121% | +180% | +200% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | — | $194B | — |
| INCY BiotechnologyIncyte Corporation | 3/5 short1/3 long | −6.4% | +0.8% | +20.3% | +15.0% | +35.3% | +112% | +77.6% | +31.8% | 30.1% | 0.53 | −66.5% | — | $24B | — |
| BIIB Drug Manufacturers - GeneralBiogen Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +11.0% | +21.6% | +32.6% | +36.7% | +65.8% | −5.6% | −8.8% | −18.9% | 34.7% | 0.11 | −72.7% | — | $36B | — |
| DHR Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchDanaher Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | +11.6% | +15.0% | −2.2% | +8.3% | +10.8% | −17.6% | +232% | 29.1% | 0.01 | −43.8% | — | $157B | — |
| REGN BiotechnologyRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +1.2% | +20.3% | +8.0% | +4.4% | +40.7% | +0.8% | +44.9% | +120% | 31.1% | 0.40 | −59.7% | — | $83B | — |
| NTLA BiotechnologyIntellia Therapeutics, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −3.1% | +8.4% | −22.2% | +28.6% | −57.7% | −55.6% | −90.8% | −5.0% | 78.0% | -0.22 | −96.5% | — | $1.7B | — |
| SRPT BiotechnologySarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −4.8% | +13.9% | −10.5% | −10.0% | −16.8% | −82.8% | −76.0% | −60.9% | 70.3% | -0.03 | −93.3% | — | $2.0B | — |
| RARE BiotechnologyUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +9.4% | −43.8% | −36.1% | −32.1% | −53.4% | −51.6% | −79.2% | −75.9% | 58.4% | -0.22 | −92.7% | — | $1.6B | — |
| ALNY BiotechnologyAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −5.6% | −15.4% | −25.8% | −42.3% | −53.0% | +42.6% | +13.2% | +514% | 50.9% | 0.29 | −58.2% | — | $31B | — |
| CRSP BiotechnologyCRISPR Therapeutics AG | 0/5 short0/3 long | −14.5% | +6.2% | −13.5% | −7.2% | −32.6% | +29.2% | −49.3% | +258% | 60.9% | 0.08 | −85.1% | — | $4.8B | — |
| NBIX BiotechnologyNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.4% | −17.9% | +7.9% | +1.0% | +0.5% | +28.6% | +37.4% | +211% | 33.2% | 0.36 | −46.4% | — | $14B | — |
| NVO Drug Manufacturers - GeneralNovo Nordisk A/S | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.1% | −20.0% | −1.5% | −23.9% | −28.5% | −57.0% | −18.5% | +134% | 39.1% | 0.09 | −75.2% | — | $174B | — |
| IONS BiotechnologyIonis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.1% | −14.3% | −39.4% | −43.0% | −38.3% | −1.6% | +48.8% | +58.8% | 43.9% | 0.40 | −70.4% | — | $7.5B | — |
| BMRN BiotechnologyBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −11.9% | −4.5% | +2.8% | −5.1% | +6.3% | −31.3% | −24.9% | −33.0% | 33.0% | -0.01 | −62.1% | — | $11B | — |
| BEAM BiotechnologyBeam Therapeutics Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.3% | −5.3% | −20.1% | −8.1% | −18.6% | +40.9% | −73.5% | — | 75.0% | 0.01 | −89.1% | — | $2.6B | — |
| BNTX BiotechnologyBioNTech SE | 0/5 short0/3 long | −7.0% | −1.1% | −13.3% | −5.7% | −15.5% | +0.3% | −65.7% | — | 52.6% | -0.15 | −82.3% | — | $23B | — |
How did VRTX do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where VRTX ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with VRTX and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, VRTX finished in the top quarter in eight of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 14 of 25.
- VRTX finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, ARGX came out ahead of VRTX most often, in six of the eight years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of VRTX; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places VRTX among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of VRTX | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRTX This pageVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | — | +12.6% | −1.0% | +40.9% | +31.5% | −7.1% | +7.9% | +32.1% | +10.6% | +103% | −41.4% | +5.9% | +59.9% | +77.3% | +26.2% | −5.2% | −18.3% | +41.0% | +30.8% | −37.9% | +35.2% | +162% | +2.1% | −34.7% | −35.5% | −65.6% | +309% | +17.6% | −9.8% | −18.0% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 8 of 29 | 14 of 25 | 13 of 25 | 5 of 25 | 5 of 25 | 17 of 25 | 17 of 24 | 10 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 3 of 22 | 18 of 20 | 15 of 20 | 3 of 19 | 7 of 17 | 11 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 16 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 1 of 17 | 15 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 1 of 17 | 10 of 16 | 16 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 16 of 16 | 1 of 15 | 8 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 9 of 12 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 15 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 17 of 29 | +40.3% | +33.3% | +60.9% | +34.3% | +66.1% | +31.0% | +16.2% | +40.5% | +17.8% | −10.4% | +25.4% | +39.8% | +7.3% | +24.2% | +25.2% | +3.6% | −6.2% | −21.3% | +5.7% | −5.2% | +2.6% | −17.6% | +13.1% | −17.6% | −14.4% | +41.9% | −24.3% | +29.1% | +93.6% |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | 12 of 25 | +31.6% | +38.8% | +49.6% | −12.3% | −8.9% | +13.9% | −10.4% | −35.3% | +104% | +164% | +292% | −76.5% | +34.1% | −3.6% | −42.3% | +11.4% | +46.8% | −41.8% | −4.1% | −4.5% | −0.8% | +34.8% | −11.9% | −51.9% | +13.6% | — | — | — | — |
| UTHR United Therapeutics Corporation | 14 of 26 | +38.1% | +60.5% | −20.9% | +28.7% | +42.4% | +72.3% | −19.1% | −26.4% | +3.1% | −8.4% | +20.9% | +14.5% | +112% | +13.1% | −25.3% | +20.1% | +68.3% | −35.9% | +79.7% | −21.3% | +53.1% | +96.7% | +37.5% | +60.3% | −29.4% | −67.9% | — | — | — |
| PTCT PTC Therapeutics, Inc. | 6 of 12 | +68.3% | +63.8% | −27.8% | −4.2% | −34.7% | +27.1% | +40.0% | +106% | +52.9% | −66.3% | −37.4% | +205% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ARGX argenx SE | 6 of 8 | +36.7% | +61.7% | +0.4% | +8.2% | +19.1% | +83.2% | +67.1% | +52.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 15 of 29 | +11.8% | −1.7% | −3.4% | −17.3% | +43.5% | +43.7% | +45.6% | +18.2% | +35.0% | −0.1% | +13.8% | +13.1% | +75.8% | +43.2% | −18.8% | +16.1% | +40.0% | −40.9% | +27.4% | +50.3% | −0.2% | +19.8% | +25.3% | −15.7% | +5.6% | +98.2% | −11.4% | −61.5% | +6.7% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 15 of 29 | +29.7% | −6.8% | +13.5% | +20.4% | +0.9% | −2.0% | +27.6% | +15.2% | +22.3% | −7.6% | +4.0% | +42.3% | +34.8% | +36.8% | +18.2% | −3.0% | −2.0% | +24.3% | −32.0% | −13.4% | +22.9% | +3.8% | +27.8% | −14.4% | −11.7% | +6.5% | +130% | +93.3% | −0.4% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 6 of 12 | +14.7% | −15.1% | +12.9% | −27.4% | +57.5% | +16.0% | +33.0% | +18.7% | +28.7% | +10.8% | +16.6% | +27.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 17 of 29 | +36.6% | +18.7% | −2.0% | +23.6% | +29.9% | −6.7% | +7.9% | −9.9% | +3.0% | −27.6% | +8.6% | +25.5% | +105% | +79.5% | +12.9% | −16.3% | −15.4% | +11.2% | +41.7% | +23.4% | +50.2% | +20.1% | +71.4% | +3.6% | +58.2% | +53.9% | +31.7% | +6.7% | +53.6% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 14 of 29 | +43.0% | +10.0% | −21.8% | +9.4% | −15.6% | −0.4% | +37.3% | −32.9% | −5.5% | −7.5% | +48.3% | +44.4% | +205% | +10.7% | −9.4% | +81.8% | +140% | −62.3% | +72.1% | +9.4% | −46.6% | +46.1% | +50.0% | −76.5% | −21.9% | −17.1% | +60.5% | −16.9% | +74.7% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 14 of 29 | +15.1% | −40.9% | −6.6% | +15.4% | −2.0% | −17.5% | −1.4% | −5.5% | +12.3% | −7.4% | −9.8% | +21.4% | +91.0% | +33.0% | +64.1% | +25.3% | +12.3% | −16.3% | +15.7% | +8.6% | −32.0% | +81.5% | +10.6% | −51.9% | +9.1% | +93.0% | +318% | +36.6% | +44.7% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 16 of 29 | +0.4% | −0.4% | −1.2% | −19.0% | +48.6% | +45.4% | +49.5% | +11.8% | +20.0% | +73.2% | +9.3% | +11.6% | +38.3% | +19.1% | −0.1% | +25.7% | +33.0% | −35.4% | +21.3% | +30.1% | −2.7% | +25.3% | +39.7% | +9.1% | −11.7% | +41.5% | −11.0% | +72.4% | +35.2% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +9.0% | −18.9% | +21.7% | +14.2% | +30.7% | +28.7% | +0.5% | −0.7% | +2.4% | −32.4% | +32.3% | +49.0% | +60.9% | +209% | +68.8% | +35.8% | +31.7% | −24.0% | +20.3% | +26.2% | +72.7% | −37.4% | −20.6% | −34.3% | −20.2% | +177% | +72.8% | −13.8% | −46.9% |
| NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −22.9% | −61.8% | −12.6% | −70.5% | +117% | +271% | +7.5% | −29.0% | +46.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 12 of 28 | −82.3% | +26.1% | −25.6% | +43.9% | −47.2% | +32.1% | +18.2% | +96.1% | +103% | −28.9% | +167% | −29.0% | −21.1% | +473% | −64.6% | +45.2% | +121% | −53.2% | −55.7% | −7.8% | +46.8% | −42.3% | −18.6% | −54.2% | +130% | −12.7% | +36.0% | −41.3% | — |
| RARE Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. | 3 of 11 | −45.3% | −12.0% | +3.2% | −44.9% | −39.3% | +224% | −1.8% | −6.3% | −34.0% | −37.3% | +156% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 11 of 21 | +69.0% | +22.9% | −19.5% | +40.1% | +30.5% | +12.8% | +58.0% | −42.6% | +239% | −60.2% | −2.9% | +50.8% | +252% | +124% | −17.3% | −44.0% | −28.7% | −15.0% | +35.9% | +60.2% | +78.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRSP CRISPR Therapeutics AG | 5 of 9 | +33.2% | −37.1% | +54.0% | −46.4% | −50.5% | +151% | +113% | +21.7% | +15.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +3.9% | +3.6% | +10.3% | +40.2% | −11.1% | −10.8% | +50.5% | −8.0% | +100% | −31.6% | +153% | +139% | +24.9% | −12.0% | +11.3% | +181% | −15.0% | −29.5% | −56.4% | −83.4% | +27.2% | −9.6% | +19.4% | −11.0% | +54.9% | +33.9% | +260% | −12.7% | −21.2% |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 16 of 29 | −39.2% | −15.9% | +54.8% | +22.6% | +63.5% | +23.3% | +28.7% | −11.8% | +54.3% | −36.6% | +39.3% | +16.7% | +15.3% | +44.0% | +4.1% | +79.3% | +27.2% | −19.8% | +57.4% | +51.3% | +5.6% | +34.6% | +43.5% | −27.0% | +14.4% | +39.0% | −1.9% | −7.3% | +54.9% |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 10 of 29 | +126% | −30.9% | +33.9% | +24.1% | −46.2% | −6.4% | +11.8% | +7.5% | +5.2% | −22.8% | +0.3% | +55.0% | +282% | +44.8% | −28.7% | −8.9% | −21.6% | −10.0% | +41.6% | +112% | −11.2% | −9.2% | −1.4% | −70.3% | +109% | +70.1% | −51.7% | +5.1% | −31.6% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 10 of 26 | −9.6% | −31.8% | −6.8% | +17.1% | +0.8% | +3.7% | −0.7% | −4.5% | +7.6% | −20.9% | +15.9% | +28.5% | +43.0% | +43.1% | +27.7% | +43.2% | +5.7% | −49.7% | +116% | +52.0% | +68.7% | −17.6% | +10.1% | −47.5% | +38.7% | −17.5% | — | — | — |
| BEAM Beam Therapeutics Inc. | 1 of 5 | +11.8% | −8.9% | −30.4% | −50.9% | −2.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BNTX BioNTech SE | 3 of 6 | −16.4% | +8.0% | −29.7% | −41.0% | +216% | +141% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How VRTX has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were VRTX's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents VRTX's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1991, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of VRTX's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: VRTX fell 70.2% from February 1997 to August 1998, while the S&P 500 rose 20.6%.
- The slowest recovery came after VRTX fell 91.8% from November 2000 to November 2003; it did not regain that peak until July 2014, 11 years later.
Green means VRTX fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | VRTX fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −91.8% | −23.1% | Nov 2000 | Nov 2003 | 3 years | Jul 2014 | 10.7 years |
| No named crash | −70.2% | +20.6% | Feb 1997 | Aug 1998 | 18 months | Feb 2000 | 18 months |
| No named crash | −60.8% | — | Jan 1992 | Jun 1992 | 5 months | Oct 1993 | 16 months |
| Dot-com bust | −55.3% | −2.4% | Mar 2000 | Apr 2000 | 1 month | Jun 2000 | 2 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −49.1% | +11.8% | Aug 2015 | Dec 2016 | 16 months | Jul 2017 | 7 months |
How did VRTX do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far VRTX, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- VRTX fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when VRTX fell 86.7% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, AMGN held up best, falling less than VRTX in nine of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than VRTX.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRTX This pageVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | — | 0.0% | −19.2% | −19.4% | −21.2% | −8.8% | −43.7% | −23.9% | −2.7% | −59.9% | −86.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 8 of 10 | −0.6% | −11.7% | −16.9% | −10.2% | −8.6% | −19.6% | −10.9% | 0.0% | −50.0% | −54.3% |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | 1 of 9 | 0.0% | −35.4% | −33.7% | −24.9% | −8.7% | −36.4% | −43.7% | −5.4% | −80.0% | — |
| UTHR United Therapeutics Corporation | 3 of 10 | −1.8% | −22.3% | −31.2% | −21.2% | −5.3% | −31.3% | −35.1% | −3.5% | −57.8% | −93.2% |
| PTCT PTC Therapeutics, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −8.2% | −43.4% | −45.5% | −36.8% | −7.4% | −47.7% | — | — | — | — |
| ARGX argenx SE | 2 of 5 | 0.0% | −26.0% | −32.8% | −19.8% | −1.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 4 of 10 | −2.4% | −19.8% | −24.8% | −17.2% | −8.7% | −14.7% | −24.4% | −3.6% | −53.9% | −41.8% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 9 of 10 | −1.2% | −11.9% | −18.3% | −14.3% | −7.4% | −22.1% | −12.6% | −0.5% | −31.3% | −60.2% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 3 of 6 | −6.8% | −35.9% | −48.9% | −19.2% | −5.3% | −28.7% | — | — | — | — |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −1.6% | −20.0% | −13.7% | −22.7% | −5.5% | −28.7% | −18.2% | −2.1% | −34.3% | −53.6% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 2 of 10 | −2.4% | −20.4% | −23.7% | −16.4% | −4.8% | −50.2% | −32.9% | −4.5% | −83.5% | −97.1% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 5 of 10 | −2.5% | −22.4% | −21.2% | −21.7% | −9.3% | −24.6% | −19.4% | −0.6% | −52.7% | −59.8% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 6 of 10 | −3.2% | −22.8% | −25.9% | −13.4% | −9.8% | −14.0% | −21.8% | −0.6% | −45.7% | −33.7% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −0.2% | −25.8% | −12.7% | −17.3% | −7.3% | −37.7% | −23.2% | −7.2% | −49.9% | −71.6% |
| NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | 0 of 5 | −11.0% | −66.1% | −38.3% | −60.4% | −9.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −6.7% | −29.7% | −33.6% | −39.7% | −12.6% | −74.3% | −39.5% | −5.0% | −84.4% | −87.3% |
| RARE Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. | 0 of 6 | −8.8% | −56.5% | −45.1% | −56.9% | −9.6% | −61.4% | — | — | — | — |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −4.1% | −28.9% | −30.0% | −33.7% | −6.9% | −48.9% | −39.3% | −1.5% | −58.6% | — |
| CRSP CRISPR Therapeutics AG | 0 of 5 | −9.8% | −41.0% | −42.0% | −51.1% | −16.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −3.5% | −24.3% | −27.9% | −45.1% | −5.7% | −44.1% | −32.8% | −7.1% | −83.0% | −65.8% |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 7 of 10 | −1.1% | −21.4% | −23.7% | −13.8% | −3.9% | −20.8% | −23.1% | −1.7% | −40.9% | −51.0% |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −5.8% | −26.3% | −32.6% | −18.1% | −8.5% | −48.8% | −25.7% | −2.1% | −45.6% | −74.6% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 1 of 10 | −4.5% | −22.9% | −26.3% | −24.4% | −11.6% | −53.6% | −23.1% | −4.1% | −74.9% | −89.7% |
| BEAM Beam Therapeutics Inc. | 0 of 3 | −14.0% | −61.9% | −52.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BNTX BioNTech SE | 0 of 3 | −1.2% | −45.7% | −49.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does VRTX move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares VRTX with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, VRTX captured 87% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 50% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.46. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only LLY had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than VRTX's 1.75, out of 20 popular alternatives with the same record.
- LLY took just 6% of the S&P 500's losses, against 50% for VRTX, while still keeping 101% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than VRTX's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRTX This pageVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 87% | 50% | 1.75 | 0.46 |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 101% | 6% | 15.73 | 0.37 |
| EXEL Exelixis, Inc. | 74% | 43% | 1.72 | 0.73 |
| UTHR United Therapeutics Corporation | 75% | 45% | 1.66 | 0.52 |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 52% | 36% | 1.44 | 0.35 |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 74% | 64% | 1.16 | 0.54 |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 69% | 66% | 1.04 | 0.56 |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 84% | 84% | 1.01 | 0.75 |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 104% | 104% | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 92% | 93% | 0.99 | 0.73 |
| PTCT PTC Therapeutics, Inc. | 112% | 115% | 0.97 | 0.85 |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 55% | 66% | 0.84 | 0.19 |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 75% | 94% | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 128% | 167% | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 52% | 87% | 0.60 | 0.77 |
| IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 71% | 125% | 0.56 | 0.74 |
| NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. | 139% | 283% | 0.49 | 2.00 |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 35% | 91% | 0.38 | 0.28 |
| SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 71% | 217% | 0.33 | 0.89 |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 20% | 70% | 0.29 | 0.38 |
| RARE Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. | 19% | 142% | 0.13 | 1.07 |
What diversifies VRTX?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with VRTX's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing VRTX with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in VRTX into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+23.6% for VRTX alone, +22.8% for the mix).
- MCK made money in nine of the 11 calendar years in which VRTX lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of VRTX over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.24 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which VRTX lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% VRTX and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2021 | 2016 | 2011 | 2010 | 2007 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (this page) | 1.00 | +177% | 0.85 | −1.0% | −7.1% | −41.4% | −5.2% | −18.3% | −37.9% | −34.7% | −35.5% | −65.6% | −9.8% | −18.0% | 25.6% | +23.6% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.24 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +17.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.0% | +22.8% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.19 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +18.0% | +1.1% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 21.1% | +24.9% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.23 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +23.1% | +29.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.3% | +22.6% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.31 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +19.6% | +15.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.5% | +21.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.03 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +42.1% | +35.6% | +6.8% | +19.0% | +6.0% | +87.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | — | 21.8% | +28.0% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.31 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | +19.6% | +6.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.3% | +22.1% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.19 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −4.2% | +8.0% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +30.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 21.4% | +23.3% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.14 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +22.7% | +7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.4% | +24.1% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2021 | 2016 | 2011 | 2010 | 2007 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (this page) | 1.00 | +177% | 0.85 | −1.0% | −7.1% | −41.4% | −5.2% | −18.3% | −37.9% | −34.7% | −35.5% | −65.6% | −9.8% | −18.0% | 25.6% | +23.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.29 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | −0.4% | −17.5% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −9.8% | +3.5% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +51.7% | +29.1% | 22.6% | +27.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.00 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +37.9% | +7.4% | −24.4% | +2.8% | −25.7% | +6.9% | −65.1% | −25.6% | — | — | 23.6% | +41.6% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | -0.02 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +89.0% | +18.3% | −17.0% | +8.7% | +2.1% | +63.6% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −9.5% | — | 22.2% | +37.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.33 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +44.2% | −28.3% | +11.8% | +13.8% | +29.7% | +19.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +46.9% | +96.3% | 22.7% | +26.5% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.04 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +61.0% | +0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.7% | +29.8% |
Common questions
What was VRTX's worst drawdown?
VRTX's deepest decline since it began trading in 1991 was 91.8%, from November 2000 to November 2003. It took about 11 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were VRTX's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, VRTX's best year was 2000, when it returned 309%. Its worst was 2001, with a return of -65.6%.
Is there a better investment than VRTX?
Among VRTX's popular alternatives, LLY earned more for the risk it took than VRTX over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 34.5%, against 41.6% for VRTX. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ABBV (pharmaceuticals) earned more than VRTX with less volatility over the past 5 years: 26.1% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 22.6% a year at 29.1%.
Is VRTX more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. VRTX's volatility over the past 5 years was 29.1%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, VRTX's return lands within 29.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is VRTX's Sharpe ratio?
VRTX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.85, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so VRTX earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is VRTX with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, VRTX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.17 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against VRTX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a VRTX holding.
What are the best alternatives to VRTX?
Of the 24 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed VRTX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: LLY and EXEL.
Did VRTX outperform the S&P 500?
VRTX finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +12.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did VRTX do in stock market crashes?
VRTX fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when VRTX fell 86.7% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies VRTX?
These had a low correlation with VRTX over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.24), DXJ (correlation 0.19) and EMLP (correlation 0.23); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.29), CLS (correlation 0.00) and FIX (correlation -0.02). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than VRTX's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of VRTX's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to VRTX
LLYEli Lilly and Company
ARGXargenx
TMOThermo Fisher Scientific
AMGNAmgen
IQVIQVIA
GILDGilead Sciences
DHRDanaher
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals
NVONovo Nordisk A/S