Relative Intelligence · Industrial Machinery

How Parker-Hannifin (PH) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on PH alone. It places PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where PH stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: PH's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowPH has gone against the market, falling 4.8% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. Its industrial machinery peers split over the past 6 months: DHR (Danaher) rose 15.0%, while HWM (Howmet Aerospace) fell 17.1%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?PH fell 0.4% over the past 3 months, 5.7 points ahead of the industrial machinery ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF), which fell 6.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its industrial machinery peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: EMR (Emerson Electric) rose 17.9%, while HWM (Howmet Aerospace) fell 22.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, PH rose 28.7% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (161% against 89.3%). The last two calendar years both went the same way: PH rose 39.5% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termPH turned $10,000 into $88,900 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. PH's 10-year return of 789% puts it ahead of 93% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, PH has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. In the Covid crash, PH fell 54.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than DHR (Danaher, 25.9%) but less than HWM (Howmet Aerospace, 64.8%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationPH is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.64 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.67 with the total US market, more closely than 94% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- CW (Curtiss-Wright) earned more than PH over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 30.8% a year at 28.7% volatility, against 27.4% a year at 28.8%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- ESLT (Elbit Systems, aerospace & defense) earned more for the risk it took than PH over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 35.4%, against 54.7% for PH.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them HSBC, MCK (McKesson) and CAH (Cardinal Health).
How much would $10,000 in PH have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in PH over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of PH over the same span and PH's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in PH at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $505,227 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of PH, and ROK finished highest, at $1,295,740.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 103 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ROK$1M+12,857% total · +18.3% a year
- AME$869,262+8,593% total · +16.6% a year
- DHR$777,394+7,674% total · +16.2% a year
- CW$708,111+6,981% total · +15.8% a year
- CAT$615,591+6,056% total · +15.3% a year
- PH$505,227+4,952% total · +14.5% a year
- NDSN$336,601+3,266% total · +12.9% a year
- RTX$288,741+2,787% total · +12.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- HWM$100,078+901% total · +8.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 243 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- HWM$73,554+636% total · +49.0% a year
- NVT$53,086+431% total · +39.6% a year
- MOG-A$52,115+421% total · +39.1% a year
- GE$49,841+398% total · +37.9% a year
- ESLT$49,131+391% total · +37.5% a year
- CAT$46,130+361% total · +35.8% a year
- CW$43,818+338% total · +34.4% a year
- PH$36,392+264% total · +29.5% a year
- RTX$24,048+140% total · +19.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
PH at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- PH's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 66.9%, from May 2008 to March 2009. It took 20 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, PH's best was 1997, when it returned 80.1%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 42.6%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- PH is 11.9% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $119B
- Industry
- Industrial - Machinery
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +28.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +161%+37.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +235%+27.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +789%+24.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +80.1%1997
- Worst calendar year
- −42.6%2008
- Losing years
- 8 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 28.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.99return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −66.9%May 2008 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −11.9%below the peak
PH against the whole market
Where PH ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does PH rank among all stocks?
This section ranks PH on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how PH stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), PH ranks in the top 4% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | PH | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +28.7% | 1,006 of 3,287 | top 31% |
| 3-year return | +161% | 537 of 3,017 | top 18% |
| 5-year return | +235% | 249 of 2,893 | top 9% |
| 10-year return | +789% | 161 of 2,202 | top 7% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 28.8% | 622 of 2,893 | top 22% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.99 | 105 of 2,893 | top 4% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −54.7% | 652 of 2,187 | top 30% |
What has beaten PH on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). PH sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than PH with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Four stocks and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than PH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half PH's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 14% less than PH's 28.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.99 for PH.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to PH; faint dots are 2 more of the 5 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than PH?
Investments that beat PH over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among PH's popular alternatives, CW earned more than PH over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 30.8% a year at 28.7% volatility, against 27.4% a year at 28.8%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ESLT (aerospace & defense) earned more for the risk it took than PH over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 35.4%, against 54.7% for PH.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them HSBC, MCK and CAH.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat PH over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks PH's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than PH follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than PH's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× PH's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than PH's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with PH?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.64 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against PH. 1 of 25 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, similar volatility | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.51 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 5 shownEverything else in Industrial Machinery and the categories next to it (Infrastructure, Electrical Equipment, Aerospace & Defense, Industrial Distribution), plus PH's specific themes. 5 of 90 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
NVTnVent Electric plc · Electrical Equipment | Higher return in most periods | +35.4% | 38.0% | 0.99 | −56.2% | — | 0.53 | — | |
MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return in most periods | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.60 | — | |
ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.05 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatility | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.68 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +17.3% | 27.8% | 0.71 | −57.7% | +809% | 0.49 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 62 of 3,518 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.46 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.25 | — | ||
EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.35 | 0.59% | |
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.44 | 0.48% | |
EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.57 | — | |
What these numbers mean for PH
- Annual return
- PH returned 27.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $33,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- PH's volatility over the past 5 years was 28.8%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PH's return lands within 28.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- PH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.99, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PH earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- PH's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 54.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 54.7% fall takes a 121% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, PH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.64 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PH holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 5 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than PH with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with PH | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.46 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.25 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.27 | — | |
| 4 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.57 | — |
| 5 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.35 | 0.59% |
PH against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against PH, compared period by period and year by year.
How do PH's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at PH, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only CW was both more rewarding and calmer than PH over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, PH returned 27.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (28.8% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than PH with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | +47.3% | 32.5% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | +31.1% | 31.9% |
| CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | +30.8% | 28.7% |
| PH This pageParker-Hannifin Corporation | +27.4% | 28.8% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | +20.4% | 32.1% |
| RTX RTX Corporation | +18.6% | 24.3% |
| ITT ITT Inc. | +17.1% | 29.8% |
| FLS Flowserve Corporation | +15.4% | 36.6% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | +14.4% | 22.1% |
| DE Deere & Company | +14.4% | 29.9% |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | +12.7% | 27.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| TKR The Timken Company | +11.2% | 33.1% |
| IR Ingersoll Rand Inc. | +8.1% | 30.4% |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | +7.8% | 32.3% |
| NDSN Nordson Corporation | +7.1% | 25.2% |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | +6.7% | 21.4% |
| DOV Dover Corporation | +4.4% | 25.1% |
| GGG Graco Inc. | +3.5% | 22.9% |
| IEX IDEX Corporation | +2.7% | 24.0% |
| RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation | +1.8% | 41.7% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | +1.5% | 22.8% |
| AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | −0.4% | 27.6% |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | −2.5% | 26.5% |
| BA The Boeing Company | −2.5% | 36.8% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | −3.8% | 29.1% |
| SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | −9.6% | 38.3% |
Has PH consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares PH with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than PH helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 25 popular alternatives outperformed PH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was CAT.
- CW and CAT earned more for the risk they took than PH (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- HWM outperformed PH over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so PH has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than PH over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation (this page) | — | −1.4% | −0.4% | −4.8% | +6.3% | +28.7% | +161% | +235% | +789% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | — | $119B | — |
| CAT Agricultural - MachineryCaterpillar Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −11.2% | −15.9% | −8.8% | +22.2% | +37.7% | +203% | +288% | +936% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | — | $333B | — |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −6.9% | −22.1% | −17.1% | +0.1% | +10.2% | +391% | +594% | +1,028% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | — | $84B | — |
| RTX Aerospace & DefenseRTX Corporation | 2/5 short1/3 long | −0.5% | −0.2% | −0.5% | +4.4% | +22.1% | +183% | +135% | +317% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | — | $261B | — |
| CW Aerospace & DefenseCurtiss-Wright Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −12.8% | −30.1% | −32.1% | −13.4% | −11.6% | +148% | +283% | +512% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | — | $18B | — |
| AME Electrical Equipment & PartsAMETEK, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +2.5% | +5.3% | +4.8% | +18.8% | +32.8% | +78.1% | +96.1% | +481% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | — | $57B | — |
| NDSN Industrial - MachineryNordson Corporation | 5/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | +15.0% | +16.2% | +36.9% | +40.5% | +57.7% | +40.9% | +262% | 25.2% | 0.40 | −44.2% | — | $18B | — |
| IEX Industrial - MachineryIDEX Corporation | 5/5 short0/3 long | +5.1% | +5.7% | +14.1% | +32.0% | +41.9% | +26.1% | +14.1% | +205% | 24.0% | 0.23 | −35.5% | — | $17B | — |
| SWK Manufacturing - Tools & AccessoriesStanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +6.1% | +8.5% | +27.7% | +26.8% | +42.0% | +36.2% | −39.7% | +2.0% | 38.3% | -0.07 | −71.3% | — | $14B | — |
| DE Agricultural - MachineryDeere & Company | 4/5 short0/3 long | −7.5% | +8.1% | +6.9% | +36.5% | +38.3% | +75.4% | +96.1% | +755% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | — | $170B | — |
| EMR Industrial - MachineryEmerson Electric Co. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +5.8% | +17.9% | +10.1% | +19.5% | +25.0% | +84.9% | +82.1% | +309% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | — | $90B | — |
| ITW Industrial - MachineryIllinois Tool Works Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +3.5% | +1.9% | +2.1% | +12.3% | +11.7% | +32.1% | +38.4% | +208% | 21.4% | 0.41 | −37.9% | — | $78B | — |
| ROK Industrial - MachineryRockwell Automation, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +0.7% | −6.4% | +4.1% | +8.4% | +22.9% | +68.9% | +45.6% | +335% | 32.3% | 0.40 | −45.1% | — | $48B | — |
| TKR Manufacturing - Tools & AccessoriesThe Timken Company | 3/5 short0/3 long | −1.3% | −15.5% | +5.1% | +32.5% | +52.9% | +70.5% | +70.1% | +303% | 33.1% | 0.49 | −58.3% | — | $7.9B | — |
| DHR Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchDanaher Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | +11.6% | +15.0% | −2.2% | +8.3% | +10.8% | −17.6% | +232% | 29.1% | 0.01 | −43.8% | — | $157B | — |
| ITT Industrial - MachineryITT Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −4.6% | +2.8% | −9.8% | +13.3% | +14.6% | +112% | +121% | +539% | 29.8% | 0.68 | −49.5% | — | $18B | — |
| GGG Industrial - MachineryGraco Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.3% | +10.5% | −6.3% | −0.5% | −0.1% | +20.3% | +18.5% | +263% | 22.9% | 0.26 | −30.6% | — | $13B | — |
| RRX Industrial - MachineryRegal Rexnord Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +3.8% | −23.9% | −24.7% | +7.4% | +8.5% | +30.6% | +9.3% | +212% | 41.7% | 0.25 | −48.1% | — | $10B | — |
| FLS Industrial - MachineryFlowserve Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −6.1% | +5.1% | −15.7% | −0.3% | +38.1% | +97.4% | +104% | +94.5% | 36.6% | 0.57 | −64.8% | — | $8.9B | — |
| AOS Industrial - MachineryA. O. Smith Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +4.5% | +1.7% | −8.2% | −11.4% | −12.8% | −5.4% | −1.8% | +46.1% | 27.6% | 0.12 | −46.8% | — | $8.1B | — |
| ETN Electrical Equipment & PartsEaton Corporation plc | 1/5 short0/3 long | −12.3% | −4.6% | −5.8% | +17.7% | +2.3% | +104% | +153% | +657% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | — | $148B | — |
| DOV Industrial - MachineryDover Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.9% | −5.7% | −10.7% | +1.5% | +17.9% | +51.3% | +24.2% | +320% | 25.1% | 0.30 | −45.2% | — | $27B | — |
| HON ConglomeratesHoneywell International Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +3.3% | −5.4% | −10.7% | +5.2% | +6.8% | +27.0% | +7.5% | +160% | 22.8% | 0.18 | −43.0% | — | $68B | — |
| IR Industrial - MachineryIngersoll Rand Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +8.7% | −2.0% | −8.6% | −1.4% | +0.3% | +30.4% | +47.6% | — | 30.4% | 0.41 | −49.1% | — | $30B | — |
| XYL Industrial - MachineryXylem Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.1% | −12.6% | −12.1% | −22.5% | −27.4% | +18.7% | −11.7% | +143% | 26.5% | 0.04 | −46.7% | — | $25B | — |
| BA Aerospace & DefenseThe Boeing Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | −5.3% | −9.1% | −15.4% | −16.4% | −12.2% | +5.8% | −11.9% | +52.4% | 36.8% | 0.12 | −77.9% | — | $151B | — |
How did PH do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where PH ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with PH and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- PH finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 19 of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last four.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, PH finished in the top quarter in nine of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 5 of 26.
- Among its popular alternatives, DHR came out ahead of PH most often, in 17 of the 29 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of PH; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places PH among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of PH | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PH This pageParker-Hannifin Corporation | — | +39.5% | +39.6% | +60.8% | −6.9% | +18.3% | +34.8% | +40.7% | −24.0% | +44.3% | +47.6% | −23.1% | +2.0% | +53.9% | +13.7% | −10.1% | +62.7% | +29.4% | −42.5% | +48.6% | +18.0% | −11.8% | +28.9% | +31.2% | +2.1% | +5.7% | −12.5% | +59.3% | −27.5% | +80.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 29 | 5 of 26 | 5 of 26 | 1 of 26 | 15 of 26 | 17 of 26 | 6 of 26 | 12 of 26 | 22 of 26 | 10 of 25 | 3 of 25 | 22 of 25 | 16 of 25 | 8 of 25 | 19 of 25 | 18 of 24 | 4 of 24 | 17 of 24 | 16 of 24 | 3 of 24 | 11 of 24 | 24 of 24 | 10 of 24 | 16 of 24 | 11 of 24 | 15 of 24 | 19 of 24 | 3 of 24 | 18 of 24 | 1 of 24 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 14 of 29 | +60.3% | +24.7% | +25.9% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +27.0% | +19.5% | −17.6% | +75.0% | +42.1% | −23.0% | +3.5% | +3.4% | +1.6% | −1.5% | +68.5% | +33.2% | −36.8% | +20.5% | +7.8% | +20.7% | +19.7% | +86.1% | −9.8% | +13.7% | +4.1% | +4.7% | −3.0% | +31.2% |
| HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 12 of 29 | +87.9% | +103% | +37.8% | +24.2% | +11.7% | −7.2% | +83.6% | −37.5% | +48.4% | −11.5% | −36.3% | +50.9% | +25.6% | +2.9% | −42.9% | −2.8% | +51.3% | −67.4% | +26.4% | +5.5% | −1.8% | −14.1% | +75.3% | −33.1% | +9.8% | −15.9% | +133% | +7.0% | +11.8% |
| RTX RTX Corporation | 15 of 29 | +61.4% | +40.8% | −14.4% | +20.0% | +23.3% | −16.7% | +44.1% | −14.5% | +19.3% | +17.3% | −14.3% | +3.4% | +42.0% | +15.3% | −4.8% | +16.4% | +33.4% | −28.4% | +24.6% | +13.8% | +10.2% | +10.9% | +55.5% | −2.6% | −16.8% | +22.7% | +21.1% | +51.8% | +11.7% |
| CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 16 of 29 | +55.7% | +59.7% | +34.0% | +21.0% | +19.9% | −16.8% | +38.7% | −15.8% | +24.5% | +44.4% | −2.2% | +14.3% | +91.4% | −6.0% | +7.5% | +7.1% | −5.2% | −32.9% | +36.2% | +36.9% | −4.3% | +28.4% | +42.3% | +34.9% | +3.9% | +27.8% | −1.8% | +6.3% | +46.4% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +14.7% | +10.0% | +18.8% | −4.3% | +22.3% | +22.2% | +48.3% | −5.9% | +50.0% | −8.6% | +2.5% | +0.5% | +41.0% | +34.6% | +7.9% | +54.8% | +27.6% | −35.1% | +47.9% | +13.0% | +20.0% | +48.9% | +26.4% | +21.4% | +23.7% | +37.7% | −13.6% | −16.8% | +22.4% |
| NDSN Nordson Corporation | 14 of 29 | +17.0% | −20.2% | +12.4% | −5.9% | +28.1% | +24.5% | +37.9% | −17.6% | +31.8% | +76.8% | −16.7% | +6.0% | +18.8% | +54.8% | −9.5% | +52.0% | +93.0% | −43.5% | +17.9% | +24.9% | +3.0% | +17.7% | +42.9% | −3.8% | +5.8% | +8.0% | −4.2% | +14.1% | −26.9% |
| IEX IDEX Corporation | 14 of 29 | −13.7% | −2.4% | −3.8% | −2.2% | +19.8% | +17.2% | +37.9% | −3.2% | +48.5% | +19.5% | 0.0% | +7.0% | +61.3% | +27.9% | −3.5% | +27.8% | +31.5% | −32.1% | +15.8% | +16.8% | +2.7% | +48.2% | +29.3% | −3.6% | +6.1% | +11.2% | +26.6% | −28.5% | +33.4% |
| SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 10 of 29 | −3.2% | −15.2% | +35.5% | −58.9% | +7.3% | +9.7% | +41.2% | −28.1% | +49.2% | +9.6% | +13.4% | +21.9% | +11.8% | +12.4% | +3.6% | +32.9% | +56.6% | −27.5% | −1.5% | +7.2% | +0.5% | +32.7% | +13.5% | −23.8% | +53.0% | +7.3% | +11.8% | −39.9% | +77.9% |
| DE Deere & Company | 15 of 29 | +11.4% | +7.6% | −5.5% | +26.6% | +28.9% | +58.0% | +18.3% | −2.9% | +54.8% | +39.0% | −11.3% | −0.5% | +8.2% | +14.3% | −5.0% | +56.3% | +44.8% | −58.1% | +98.6% | +42.3% | −6.6% | +16.3% | +44.4% | +7.1% | −2.6% | +8.1% | +34.8% | −42.3% | +46.1% |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 9 of 29 | +8.9% | +29.7% | +3.8% | +5.7% | +18.2% | +8.6% | +31.6% | −11.9% | +29.1% | +21.0% | −19.7% | −9.6% | +36.1% | +17.3% | −16.3% | +37.8% | +20.7% | −33.6% | +31.5% | +20.7% | +9.2% | +11.0% | +31.4% | −8.3% | −25.7% | +40.8% | −3.0% | +9.2% | +19.1% |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 12 of 29 | −0.4% | −1.0% | +21.6% | −8.5% | +23.6% | +16.4% | +45.6% | −22.1% | +38.9% | +35.0% | +0.1% | +15.0% | +41.4% | +33.6% | −10.0% | +14.4% | +41.4% | −32.7% | +18.0% | +7.1% | −3.7% | +11.7% | +31.1% | −2.9% | +15.2% | −10.6% | +17.6% | −2.6% | +51.9% |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +38.4% | −6.2% | +22.6% | −24.8% | +41.2% | +26.2% | +37.9% | −21.8% | +48.9% | +34.5% | −5.5% | −3.9% | +43.8% | +17.2% | +4.5% | +56.1% | +50.9% | −51.9% | +14.9% | +4.7% | +21.3% | +41.8% | +76.5% | +20.0% | −11.3% | +5.5% | +168% | −1.9% | +37.1% |
| TKR The Timken Company | 12 of 29 | +20.0% | −9.5% | +15.4% | +3.9% | −9.0% | +40.4% | +54.7% | −22.2% | +26.7% | +43.2% | −31.1% | +11.9% | +17.1% | +26.1% | −17.5% | +105% | +24.1% | −38.5% | +15.0% | −7.0% | +25.9% | +32.6% | +8.4% | +21.5% | +11.8% | −22.6% | +12.3% | −43.6% | +53.4% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 17 of 29 | +0.4% | −0.4% | −1.2% | −19.0% | +48.6% | +45.4% | +49.5% | +11.8% | +20.0% | +73.2% | +9.3% | +11.6% | +38.3% | +19.1% | −0.1% | +25.7% | +33.0% | −35.4% | +21.3% | +30.1% | −2.7% | +25.3% | +39.7% | +9.1% | −11.7% | +41.5% | −11.0% | +72.4% | +35.2% |
| ITT ITT Inc. | 13 of 29 | +22.5% | +20.8% | +48.9% | −19.5% | +33.9% | +5.5% | +54.6% | −8.6% | +40.1% | +7.6% | −9.1% | −5.9% | +87.4% | +23.4% | −1.5% | +6.7% | +10.0% | −29.6% | +17.1% | +11.3% | +22.5% | +14.8% | +23.3% | +21.3% | +31.9% | +17.8% | −14.7% | +28.4% | +30.7% |
| GGG Graco Inc. | 15 of 29 | −1.5% | −1.7% | +30.6% | −15.5% | +12.6% | +41.0% | +25.9% | −6.3% | +65.6% | +17.4% | −8.6% | +4.2% | +54.1% | +28.4% | +5.8% | +41.6% | +24.3% | −34.8% | −4.4% | +10.1% | −0.8% | +49.2% | +41.5% | +11.1% | +43.8% | +17.3% | +23.6% | +20.3% | +54.9% |
| RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation | 13 of 29 | −8.6% | +5.7% | +24.6% | −28.7% | +46.6% | +45.5% | +24.1% | −7.2% | +12.1% | +20.2% | −21.1% | +3.2% | +5.8% | +39.8% | −22.7% | +29.9% | +38.9% | −14.1% | −13.3% | +50.1% | +25.8% | +32.6% | +9.0% | −2.8% | +31.1% | −14.9% | −8.2% | −20.7% | +53.3% |
| FLS Flowserve Corporation | 13 of 29 | +22.5% | +41.9% | +37.3% | +3.1% | −15.0% | −23.9% | +33.7% | −8.2% | −11.2% | +16.0% | −28.6% | −23.4% | +62.6% | +49.6% | −15.6% | +27.6% | +86.1% | −45.8% | +92.3% | +27.4% | +43.8% | +32.0% | +41.0% | −44.4% | +24.3% | +25.8% | +6.1% | −39.5% | +5.0% |
| AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 13 of 29 | +0.1% | −15.9% | +46.7% | −32.1% | +59.3% | +17.5% | +13.7% | −29.4% | +30.8% | +25.0% | +37.4% | +5.9% | +73.1% | +59.1% | +6.8% | +34.9% | +50.3% | −13.6% | −4.9% | +8.7% | +19.8% | −12.7% | +32.7% | +41.4% | +17.3% | −20.1% | −8.9% | −10.5% | +43.2% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 13 of 29 | −2.8% | +39.5% | +56.2% | −7.2% | +46.7% | +31.0% | +42.8% | −10.0% | +21.5% | +33.8% | −20.7% | −8.2% | +44.2% | +28.6% | −11.8% | +64.0% | +33.3% | −47.1% | +31.6% | +14.4% | −5.4% | +36.5% | +41.1% | +7.6% | +40.8% | +6.0% | +5.3% | −19.0% | +30.7% |
| DOV Dover Corporation | 13 of 29 | +5.2% | +23.4% | +15.2% | −24.3% | +45.7% | +11.5% | +65.8% | −11.0% | +37.7% | +25.4% | −12.4% | −8.8% | +49.5% | +15.7% | +1.4% | +43.7% | +30.3% | −26.9% | −4.4% | +22.9% | −1.8% | +7.2% | +38.7% | −20.1% | −7.3% | −9.7% | +25.4% | +2.5% | +44.6% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 10 of 29 | −6.3% | +10.2% | +0.1% | +5.0% | −0.2% | +23.1% | +36.9% | −7.5% | +35.2% | +14.3% | +4.9% | +10.6% | +45.8% | +18.5% | +3.8% | +37.8% | +21.9% | −45.9% | +37.5% | +23.1% | +6.6% | +7.3% | +41.6% | −28.0% | −27.7% | −17.2% | +31.0% | +15.1% | +16.7% |
| IR Ingersoll Rand Inc. | 2 of 8 | −12.3% | +17.1% | +48.2% | −15.4% | +35.9% | +27.0% | +92.8% | −35.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | 4 of 14 | +18.8% | +2.6% | +4.8% | −6.6% | +18.9% | +30.9% | +19.6% | −1.0% | +39.5% | +37.6% | −2.6% | +11.6% | +29.8% | +7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BA The Boeing Company | 10 of 29 | +22.7% | −32.1% | +36.8% | −5.4% | −5.9% | −33.9% | +3.3% | +11.5% | +94.7% | +11.3% | +14.1% | −2.5% | +84.7% | +5.2% | +15.2% | +23.6% | +31.8% | −50.1% | −0.1% | +28.4% | +37.9% | +24.9% | +30.4% | −13.4% | −40.4% | +61.2% | +28.7% | −32.5% | −7.1% |
Risk and diversification
How PH has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were PH's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents PH's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of PH's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: PH fell 38.3% from January to August 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 0.4%.
- The slowest recovery came after PH fell 57.6% from October 1987 to October 1990; it did not regain that peak until April 1994, four years later.
Green means PH fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | PH fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −66.9% | −50.6% | May 2008 | Mar 2009 | 10 months | Nov 2010 | 20 months |
| No named crash | −57.6% | — | Oct 1987 | Oct 1990 | 3 years | Apr 1994 | 3.5 years |
| Covid crash | −54.7% | −33.4% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Sep 2020 | 6 months |
| No named crash | −47.3% | −8.3% | Apr 1998 | Sep 1998 | 5 months | Dec 1999 | 15 months |
| Dot-com bust | −38.3% | +0.4% | Jan 2000 | Aug 2000 | 7 months | Feb 2002 | 18 months |
How did PH do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far PH, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- PH fell further than the S&P 500 in nine of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when PH fell 54.7% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, AME held up best, falling less than PH in nine of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than PH.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PH This pageParker-Hannifin Corporation | — | −8.4% | −27.3% | −54.7% | −25.6% | −8.1% | −23.7% | −30.4% | −3.5% | −66.9% | −36.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 3 of 10 | −9.7% | −30.1% | −33.1% | −28.5% | −7.3% | −26.0% | −33.2% | −2.2% | −73.3% | −42.5% |
| HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 2 of 10 | −8.5% | −20.2% | −64.8% | −30.8% | −16.0% | −38.4% | −43.5% | 0.0% | −87.3% | −58.3% |
| RTX RTX Corporation | 8 of 10 | −1.5% | −21.9% | −50.5% | −27.7% | −7.1% | −15.4% | −23.1% | −2.5% | −52.0% | −52.1% |
| CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 8 of 10 | −4.4% | −20.5% | −47.8% | −29.6% | −9.6% | −12.9% | −19.3% | −1.7% | −59.2% | −33.7% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 9 of 10 | −3.7% | −26.4% | −42.0% | −22.1% | −6.7% | −21.9% | −30.3% | −1.2% | −53.3% | −34.9% |
| NDSN Nordson Corporation | 7 of 10 | −4.4% | −21.5% | −42.1% | −23.8% | −5.7% | −28.4% | −33.9% | −2.9% | −73.6% | −34.8% |
| IEX IDEX Corporation | 7 of 10 | −2.0% | −26.1% | −34.3% | −23.8% | −7.9% | −13.1% | −33.3% | −3.3% | −58.3% | −33.9% |
| SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −4.5% | −60.7% | −55.3% | −29.7% | −6.7% | −18.2% | −31.3% | −4.0% | −58.9% | −41.3% |
| DE Deere & Company | 6 of 10 | −6.7% | −33.8% | −37.4% | −17.5% | −6.9% | −24.9% | −24.2% | 0.0% | −73.3% | −37.3% |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 8 of 10 | −4.3% | −25.4% | −47.2% | −28.8% | −5.9% | −15.9% | −25.8% | 0.0% | −56.1% | −43.6% |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 8 of 10 | −2.9% | −28.0% | −37.9% | −19.3% | −8.4% | −14.0% | −29.0% | −1.1% | −54.9% | −30.8% |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −5.4% | −43.8% | −42.4% | −27.5% | −7.9% | −23.6% | −37.5% | −1.4% | −74.7% | −42.0% |
| TKR The Timken Company | 2 of 10 | −8.7% | −30.0% | −53.6% | −33.5% | −12.1% | −29.2% | −36.3% | −2.8% | −72.5% | −44.8% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 9 of 10 | −3.2% | −22.8% | −25.9% | −13.4% | −9.8% | −14.0% | −21.8% | −0.6% | −45.7% | −33.7% |
| ITT ITT Inc. | 5 of 10 | −7.7% | −37.8% | −46.4% | −25.9% | −8.7% | −25.4% | −28.3% | −3.4% | −52.4% | −20.6% |
| GGG Graco Inc. | 7 of 10 | −3.9% | −27.4% | −30.6% | −20.1% | −8.6% | −16.5% | −35.8% | 0.0% | −64.7% | −24.8% |
| RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation | 6 of 10 | −6.7% | −37.1% | −40.8% | −21.7% | −6.5% | −31.6% | −37.2% | −1.3% | −50.4% | −44.7% |
| FLS Flowserve Corporation | 1 of 10 | −7.1% | −33.4% | −58.5% | −35.3% | −9.4% | −26.6% | −36.7% | −3.6% | −73.1% | −76.8% |
| AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 4 of 10 | −2.4% | −42.1% | −21.9% | −30.3% | −6.8% | −23.3% | −31.6% | −3.8% | −54.1% | −47.9% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 7 of 10 | −4.5% | −26.3% | −44.5% | −26.0% | −6.7% | −22.3% | −34.6% | −1.4% | −68.5% | −31.6% |
| DOV Dover Corporation | 7 of 10 | −5.9% | −35.6% | −45.0% | −25.1% | −6.8% | −20.9% | −32.8% | −1.5% | −58.2% | −54.1% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 9 of 10 | −1.4% | −22.7% | −42.2% | −22.1% | −6.8% | −14.4% | −25.3% | −1.8% | −62.2% | −65.8% |
| IR Ingersoll Rand Inc. | 2 of 5 | −8.0% | −34.3% | −49.1% | −34.4% | −7.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | 5 of 6 | −3.8% | −37.9% | −35.9% | −24.2% | −7.2% | −12.9% | — | — | — | — |
| BA The Boeing Company | 5 of 10 | −2.9% | −48.7% | −71.9% | −24.7% | −5.7% | −26.8% | −20.5% | −1.8% | −70.0% | −57.1% |
How closely does PH move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares PH with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, PH captured 141% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 126% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.43. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- ETN took just 80% of the S&P 500's losses, against 126% for PH, while still keeping 114% of its gains.
- Five of the 24 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than PH's 1.11, led by DE, ETN and CW.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than PH's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PH This pageParker-Hannifin Corporation | 141% | 126% | 1.11 | 1.43 |
| DE Deere & Company | 110% | 66% | 1.67 | 0.98 |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 114% | 80% | 1.43 | 1.16 |
| CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 103% | 77% | 1.33 | 1.20 |
| HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 142% | 115% | 1.23 | 1.41 |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 148% | 122% | 1.21 | 1.27 |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 111% | 101% | 1.10 | 1.15 |
| RTX RTX Corporation | 94% | 91% | 1.02 | 0.89 |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 84% | 84% | 1.01 | 0.75 |
| ITT ITT Inc. | 135% | 138% | 0.98 | 1.42 |
| GGG Graco Inc. | 90% | 92% | 0.98 | 0.78 |
| NDSN Nordson Corporation | 102% | 112% | 0.91 | 0.98 |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 122% | 138% | 0.88 | 1.46 |
| RRX Regal Rexnord Corporation | 95% | 110% | 0.86 | 1.18 |
| TKR The Timken Company | 123% | 145% | 0.85 | 1.45 |
| DOV Dover Corporation | 114% | 133% | 0.85 | 1.27 |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 124% | 153% | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 94% | 116% | 0.81 | 1.04 |
| IEX IDEX Corporation | 97% | 121% | 0.80 | 1.03 |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 90% | 118% | 0.77 | 1.00 |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | 90% | 123% | 0.73 | 1.03 |
| FLS Flowserve Corporation | 119% | 188% | 0.63 | 1.49 |
| BA The Boeing Company | 93% | 152% | 0.61 | 1.42 |
| AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 82% | 139% | 0.59 | 1.12 |
| SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 101% | 198% | 0.51 | 1.30 |
What diversifies PH?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with PH's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing PH with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in PH into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 15% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+29.5% for PH alone, +29.5% for the mix).
- CAH made money in six of the eight calendar years in which PH lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and GLD have moved largely independently of PH over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.44 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which PH lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% PH and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2005 | 2000 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +235% | 0.99 | −6.9% | −24.0% | −23.1% | −10.1% | −42.5% | −11.8% | −12.5% | −27.5% | 27.4% | +29.5% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.44 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | 23.1% | +29.5% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.40 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +6.8% | −44.7% | +10.8% | — | — | 25.5% | +32.1% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.03 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | — | 22.3% | +28.1% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.32 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +40.1% | +24.4% | — | 24.1% | +29.1% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.29 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | −9.9% | −12.9% | −21.8% | −45.3% | +4.7% | — | — | 23.9% | +28.8% |
| IDV InternationaliShares International Select Dividend ETF | 0.44 | +82.6% | 0.86 | −6.5% | −10.4% | −10.7% | −7.2% | −52.1% | — | — | — | 23.6% | +26.7% |
| EDIV InternationalState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 0.39 | +69.9% | 0.84 | −15.3% | −6.2% | −27.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 23.1% | +26.2% |
| PTLC Broad MarketPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 0.43 | +57.4% | 0.83 | −8.6% | +1.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.0% | +26.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2005 | 2000 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +235% | 0.99 | −6.9% | −24.0% | −23.1% | −10.1% | −42.5% | −11.8% | −12.5% | −27.5% | 27.4% | +29.5% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.46 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | +18.7% | +108% | +51.7% | 24.8% | +31.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.37 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.2% | −2.3% | — | 28.4% | +45.7% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.27 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +64.9% | +61.2% | +46.9% | 23.8% | +31.4% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.21 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 24.1% | +34.5% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.48 | +1,008% | 1.34 | +87.5% | −9.8% | −66.7% | −12.2% | −70.0% | +68.2% | −26.5% | — | 27.8% | +37.2% |
Common questions
What was PH's worst drawdown?
PH's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 66.9%, from May 2008 to March 2009. It took 20 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were PH's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, PH's best year was 1997, when it returned 80.1%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -42.6%.
Is there a better investment than PH?
Among PH's popular alternatives, CW earned more than PH over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 30.8% a year at 28.7% volatility, against 27.4% a year at 28.8%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ESLT (aerospace & defense) earned more for the risk it took than PH over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 35.4%, against 54.7% for PH.
Is PH more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. PH's volatility over the past 5 years was 28.8%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PH's return lands within 28.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is PH's Sharpe ratio?
PH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.99, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PH earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is PH with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, PH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.64 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PH holding.
What are the best alternatives to PH?
None of the 25 popular alternatives we compared outperformed PH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about PH's strength than about its alternatives.
Did PH outperform the S&P 500?
PH finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 19 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +39.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did PH do in stock market crashes?
PH fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in nine. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when PH fell 54.7% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies PH?
These had a low correlation with PH over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.44), SMH (correlation 0.40) and GLD (correlation 0.03); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.46), CLS (correlation 0.37) and MCK (correlation 0.27). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than PH's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of PH's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.