Relative Intelligence · Hotels & Resorts

How Hilton Worldwide (HLT) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on HLT alone. It places HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) against 13 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where HLT stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: HLT's full trading record, from December 2013 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, HLT rose 11.1% against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its hotels & resort peers split over the past 3 months: VAC (Marriott Vacations Worldwide) rose 17.0%, while H (Hyatt Hotels) fell 7.0%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?HLT's 11.1% gain over the past 3 months far outran its industry: the hotels & resorts ETF PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF) rose 1.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. HLT rose 17.0% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsHLT has run far ahead of the market, rising 37.9% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (145% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termHLT turned $10,000 into $79,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. HLT's 10-year return of 694% puts it ahead of 91% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross four sell-offs, HLT has typically fallen 1.7 times as far as the S&P 500. Even so, in the 2022 bear market, HLT held up better than WH (Wyndham Hotels & Resorts), TNL and VAC; only MAR (Marriott International) fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, HLT has a correlation of 0.71 over 5 years, more closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Market capture ↓
- Better optionsFew investments have done better on both counts: only 16 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HLT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ABBV (AbbVie), GILD (Gilead Sciences) and WELL (Welltower). Across the whole market, HLT outpaced 91% of stocks worth at least $300 million over the past decade. Better options ↓
How much would $10,000 in HLT have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in HLT over the past 12 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of HLT over the same span and HLT's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: HLT began trading on December 12, 2013, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 12 years of HLT's record, starting at the end of September 2014.
- $10,000 invested in HLT at the end of September 2014 would have grown to $66,678 by September 2026, more than the $47,240 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of HLT, and NVDA finished highest, at $5,214,702.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2014 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 284 of the 2,461 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of HLT; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$5M+52,047% total · +68.4% a year
- LLY$220,143+2,101% total · +29.4% a year
- APH$156,114+1,461% total · +25.7% a year
- AAPL$150,144+1,401% total · +25.3% a year
- ABBV$73,115+631% total · +18.0% a year
- HLT$66,678+567% total · +17.1% a year
- MAR$57,142+471% total · +15.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$47,240+372% total · +13.8% a year
- EXPE$32,136+221% total · +10.2% a year
- VAC$20,773+108% total · +6.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 534 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of HLT; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- DXJ$32,976+230% total · +27.0% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- TRV$25,788+158% total · +20.9% a year
- MAR$25,049+150% total · +20.2% a year
- HLT$24,416+144% total · +19.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- EXPE$16,292+62.9% total · +10.3% a year
- VAC$7,631−23.7% total · −5.3% a year
HLT at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: HLT began trading on December 12, 2013, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- HLT's deepest decline since it began trading in 2013 was 50.8%, from January to April 2020. It took nine months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- HLT is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 12 full calendar years, HLT's best was 2019, when it returned 55.5%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 18.7%. It lost money in three of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $81B
- Industry
- Travel Lodging
- Price history from
- December 2013
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +37.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +145%+34.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +160%+21.0% a year
- Past 10 years
- +694%+23.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +55.5%2019
- Worst calendar year
- −18.7%2022
- Losing years
- 3 of 12full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 26.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.85return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −50.8%Jan 2020 to Apr 2020
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
HLT against the whole market
Where HLT ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does HLT rank among all stocks?
This section ranks HLT on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how HLT stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), HLT ranks in the top 8% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | HLT | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +37.9% | 779 of 3,287 | top 24% |
| 3-year return | +145% | 627 of 3,017 | top 21% |
| 5-year return | +160% | 415 of 2,893 | top 14% |
| 10-year return | +694% | 192 of 2,202 | top 9% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 26.8% | 466 of 2,893 | top 16% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.85 | 230 of 2,893 | top 8% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −50.8% | 491 of 2,187 | top 22% |
What has beaten HLT on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). HLT sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than HLT with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 14 stocks and two ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than HLT over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half HLT's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 8% less than HLT's 26.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.85 for HLT.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to HLT; faint dots are 12 more of the 16 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than HLT?
Investments that beat HLT over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 16 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HLT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ABBV, GILD and WELL.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat HLT over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks HLT's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than HLT follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than HLT's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× HLT's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than HLT's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with HLT?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.71 | 0.09% | |||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 85 of 3,612 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.16 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.39 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.37 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.46 | 0.48% | |
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.21 | — | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.49 | — | ||
SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.20 | 0.80% | |
What these numbers mean for HLT
- Annual return
- HLT returned 21.0% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $26,000. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- HLT's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.8%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, HLT's return lands within 26.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- HLT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.85, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so HLT earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- HLT's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 50.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 50.8% fall takes a 103% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, HLT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.71 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against HLT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a HLT holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 16 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than HLT with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with HLT | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.39 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.17 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.37 | — | |
| 4 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.46 | 0.48% |
| 5 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.56 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.17 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.21 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.35 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.57 | — | |
| 10 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.53 | — |
| 11 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.35 | 0.59% |
| 12 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.55 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.43 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.51 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.39 | — | |
| 16 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.36 | — |
HLT against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against HLT, compared period by period and year by year.
How do HLT's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at HLT, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only IHG was both more rewarding and calmer than HLT over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- 11 of the 13 popular alternatives earned less than HLT over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, HLT returned 21.0% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (26.8% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than HLT with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| MAR Marriott International, Inc. | +22.0% | 28.6% |
| IHG InterContinental Hotels Group PLC | +21.3% | 26.6% |
| HLT This pageHilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | +21.0% | 26.8% |
| H Hyatt Hotels Corporation | +16.6% | 34.3% |
| HST Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | +13.8% | 30.0% |
| EXPE Expedia Group, Inc. | +13.3% | 46.5% |
| RHP Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | +13.1% | 29.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | +12.0% | 33.2% |
| TNL Travel + Leisure Co. | +9.3% | 36.6% |
| WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | +1.0% | 29.9% |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | +0.8% | 44.3% |
| CHH Choice Hotels International, Inc. | −2.3% | 30.1% |
| VAC Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation | −3.0% | 44.9% |
| HGV Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. | −5.3% | 39.0% |
Has HLT consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares HLT with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than HLT helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 13 popular alternatives outperformed HLT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was MAR.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than HLT over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (this page) | — | +17.0% | +11.1% | +4.9% | +22.8% | +37.9% | +145% | +160% | +694% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | — | $81B | — |
| MAR Travel LodgingMarriott International, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +15.9% | +8.5% | +5.3% | +27.5% | +54.1% | +117% | +170% | +544% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | — | $104B | — |
| EXPE Travel ServicesExpedia Group, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +7.0% | +13.6% | +10.5% | +6.9% | +38.8% | +226% | +86.3% | +154% | 46.5% | 0.50 | −70.5% | — | $34B | — |
| VAC Gambling, Resorts & CasinosMarriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | +10.0% | +17.0% | +49.3% | +98.3% | +74.5% | +39.2% | −14.2% | +115% | 44.9% | 0.16 | −74.9% | — | $3.9B | — |
| ABNB Travel ServicesAirbnb, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +6.1% | +22.1% | +23.2% | +33.0% | +39.1% | +51.9% | +4.2% | — | 44.3% | 0.24 | −62.0% | — | $106B | — |
| RHP REIT - Hotel & MotelRyman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +7.9% | +2.7% | +27.0% | +40.6% | +54.0% | +76.2% | +85.3% | +269% | 29.9% | 0.56 | −84.6% | — | $8.9B | — |
| HST REIT - Hotel & MotelHost Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +12.2% | +4.0% | +22.0% | +44.6% | +62.3% | +93.9% | +90.9% | +144% | 30.0% | 0.58 | −55.0% | — | $17B | — |
| IHG Travel LodgingInterContinental Hotels Group PLC | 2/5 short0/3 long | +10.6% | +9.7% | +16.9% | +22.3% | +42.6% | +147% | +163% | +383% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | — | $25B | — |
| H Travel LodgingHyatt Hotels Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +12.2% | −7.0% | +2.2% | +6.7% | +19.5% | +77.5% | +116% | +260% | 34.3% | 0.62 | −60.5% | — | $17B | — |
| TNL Travel ServicesTravel + Leisure Co. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +6.5% | −6.6% | −11.7% | −4.4% | +15.4% | +125% | +55.8% | +214% | 36.6% | 0.43 | −67.9% | — | $4.1B | — |
| BKNG Travel ServicesBooking Holdings Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.7% | −8.4% | −14.2% | −22.5% | −19.6% | +52.2% | +75.9% | +186% | 33.2% | 0.51 | −47.8% | — | $123B | — |
| CHH Travel LodgingChoice Hotels International, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +14.9% | +3.5% | −6.6% | +19.0% | +15.9% | +3.4% | −11.0% | +176% | 30.1% | 0.07 | −50.5% | — | $5.2B | — |
| HGV Travel LodgingHilton Grand Vacations Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.8% | −25.1% | −26.5% | −20.4% | −15.4% | −1.8% | −23.9% | — | 39.0% | 0.05 | −77.7% | — | $2.8B | — |
| WH Travel LodgingWyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +15.2% | +1.7% | −13.0% | +4.5% | +0.3% | +11.5% | +4.9% | — | 29.9% | 0.18 | −66.1% | — | $5.7B | — |
How did HLT do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2014, along with where HLT ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with HLT and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: HLT began trading on December 12, 2013, so the table starts with 2014, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- None of the 13 popular alternatives came out ahead of HLT in most of the years they have in common.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, HLT finished in the top quarter in four of 12 years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 14.
- HLT finished ahead of the S&P 500 in seven of its 12 full calendar years.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of HLT; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places HLT among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of HLT | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLT This pageHilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | — | +16.5% | +36.1% | +44.7% | −18.7% | +40.2% | +0.5% | +55.5% | −9.4% | +44.5% | +28.7% | −17.5% | +17.3% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 12 | 3 of 14 | 3 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 5 of 13 | 2 of 13 | 6 of 12 | 5 of 11 | 5 of 11 | 8 of 11 | 8 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 12 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% |
| MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 5 of 12 | +12.3% | +24.9% | +53.0% | −9.3% | +25.3% | −12.5% | +41.5% | −19.0% | +66.2% | +25.4% | −13.0% | +60.0% |
| EXPE Expedia Group, Inc. | 6 of 12 | +53.3% | +22.8% | +73.3% | −51.5% | +36.5% | +22.9% | −2.9% | −5.0% | +6.7% | −8.1% | +46.8% | +23.5% |
| VAC Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation | 5 of 12 | −32.7% | +9.6% | −35.3% | −18.9% | +24.0% | +7.1% | +85.9% | −47.0% | +61.5% | +51.8% | −22.5% | +41.8% |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | 1 of 5 | +3.3% | −3.5% | +59.2% | −48.6% | +13.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RHP Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | 4 of 12 | −4.8% | −1.1% | +40.4% | −10.7% | +35.7% | −19.6% | +35.7% | +1.0% | +15.1% | +29.4% | +2.9% | +32.2% |
| HST Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 2 of 12 | +7.2% | −4.9% | +27.6% | −4.7% | +18.8% | −19.7% | +16.6% | −12.2% | +10.2% | +29.5% | −32.5% | +26.7% |
| IHG InterContinental Hotels Group PLC | 5 of 12 | +14.5% | +39.1% | +59.6% | −8.7% | +0.1% | −5.2% | +27.9% | −12.5% | +45.3% | +44.2% | −0.8% | +13.5% |
| H Hyatt Hotels Corporation | 3 of 12 | +2.6% | +20.9% | +44.8% | −5.7% | +29.2% | −17.0% | +34.1% | −7.4% | +33.1% | +17.5% | −21.9% | +21.7% |
| TNL Travel + Leisure Co. | 4 of 12 | +45.5% | +34.7% | +12.5% | −31.7% | +26.0% | −8.6% | +50.1% | −29.0% | +55.4% | +8.1% | −13.5% | +18.5% |
| BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 6 of 12 | +8.6% | +41.3% | +76.0% | −16.0% | +7.7% | +8.5% | +19.2% | −0.9% | +18.5% | +15.0% | +11.8% | −1.9% |
| CHH Choice Hotels International, Inc. | 4 of 12 | −32.3% | +26.2% | +1.6% | −27.1% | +46.7% | +3.6% | +45.9% | −6.7% | +40.2% | +13.1% | −8.7% | +16.3% |
| HGV Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. | 1 of 8 | +14.9% | −3.1% | +4.3% | −26.0% | +66.2% | −8.8% | +30.3% | −37.1% | — | — | — | — |
| WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 1 of 7 | −23.5% | +27.7% | +14.9% | −19.0% | +52.6% | −4.1% | +41.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How HLT has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were HLT's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents HLT's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2013, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: HLT began trading on December 12, 2013, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of HLT's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 16 months, after HLT fell 44.4% from April 2015 to January 2016.
Green means HLT fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | HLT fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covid crash | −50.8% | −24.8% | Jan 2020 | Apr 2020 | 3 months | Jan 2021 | 9 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −44.4% | −8.0% | Apr 2015 | Jan 2016 | 9 months | May 2017 | 16 months |
| 2022 bear market | −32.6% | −13.5% | Apr 2022 | Jul 2022 | 3 months | Nov 2023 | 16 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −26.8% | −6.2% | Jan 2018 | Oct 2018 | 9 months | Apr 2019 | 6 months |
| No named crash | −26.4% | −17.5% | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 | 2 months | Jul 2025 | 3 months |
How did HLT do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far HLT, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: HLT began trading on December 12, 2013, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- HLT fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the six crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when HLT fell 34.1% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CHH held up best, falling less than HLT in four of the six crashes they both traded through.
- HLT began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but eight of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was CHH's 49.2%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than HLT.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLT This pageHilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | — | −6.7% | −32.6% | −49.6% | −22.2% | −4.8% | −34.1% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 6 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −7.4% | −29.9% | −56.6% | −24.0% | −5.2% | −24.9% | −25.6% | −2.8% | −70.1% | −46.2% |
| EXPE Expedia Group, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −11.4% | −58.2% | −62.4% | −18.2% | −19.6% | −33.2% | −22.9% | −4.7% | −82.5% | — |
| VAC Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation | 0 of 6 | −11.5% | −33.8% | −71.1% | −47.7% | −6.6% | −41.8% | — | — | — | — |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.2% | −52.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RHP Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −8.5% | −26.0% | −84.3% | −24.5% | −8.3% | −22.0% | −43.5% | −4.2% | −91.0% | −43.1% |
| HST Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −7.0% | −27.5% | −46.4% | −24.8% | −6.8% | −33.0% | −39.9% | −4.0% | −84.5% | −52.6% |
| IHG InterContinental Hotels Group PLC | 3 of 6 | −4.1% | −32.8% | −56.8% | −19.7% | −4.8% | −20.5% | −25.6% | −3.7% | −73.3% | — |
| H Hyatt Hotels Corporation | 2 of 6 | −10.1% | −33.2% | −60.5% | −21.3% | −3.4% | −33.6% | −28.3% | −3.6% | — | — |
| TNL Travel + Leisure Co. | 1 of 6 | −12.8% | −43.6% | −65.5% | −23.5% | −6.6% | −25.0% | −27.3% | −5.8% | −91.1% | — |
| BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 3 of 6 | −5.6% | −39.5% | −41.5% | −19.1% | −6.3% | −33.7% | −17.8% | −3.2% | −66.3% | −98.9% |
| CHH Choice Hotels International, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −6.0% | −32.3% | −50.5% | −20.5% | −4.0% | −22.9% | −18.1% | −2.6% | −49.2% | −53.5% |
| HGV Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. | 1 of 5 | −10.5% | −39.5% | −67.1% | −26.2% | −3.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 0 of 4 | −10.4% | −34.1% | −63.7% | −22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does HLT move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares HLT with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- None of the ten popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than HLT's 1.16.
- Over the past 10 years, HLT captured 121% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 105% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.18. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than HLT's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLT This pageHilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 121% | 105% | 1.16 | 1.18 |
| MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 132% | 137% | 0.96 | 1.46 |
| IHG InterContinental Hotels Group PLC | 115% | 125% | 0.92 | 1.19 |
| RHP Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | 109% | 128% | 0.85 | 1.46 |
| H Hyatt Hotels Corporation | 115% | 143% | 0.81 | 1.42 |
| BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 99% | 123% | 0.81 | 1.17 |
| CHH Choice Hotels International, Inc. | 85% | 105% | 0.81 | 1.06 |
| TNL Travel + Leisure Co. | 124% | 167% | 0.74 | 1.54 |
| EXPE Expedia Group, Inc. | 104% | 144% | 0.72 | 1.48 |
| HST Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 97% | 136% | 0.71 | 1.22 |
| VAC Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation | 121% | 195% | 0.62 | 1.88 |
What diversifies HLT?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with HLT's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing HLT with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in HLT into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+19.6% for HLT alone, +20.1% for the mix).
- FIX made money in three of the three calendar years in which HLT lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and GLD have moved largely independently of HLT over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.47 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which HLT lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% HLT and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +160% | 0.85 | −18.7% | −9.4% | −17.5% | 24.2% | +19.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.46 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | 20.6% | +21.4% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.47 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | 23.4% | +23.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.04 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | 19.8% | +20.1% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.32 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | 21.6% | +21.0% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.44 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | −9.9% | −12.9% | 22.1% | +20.6% |
| EUFN InternationaliShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 0.45 | +133% | 0.89 | −8.8% | −23.1% | −4.7% | 21.4% | +20.3% |
| IDV InternationaliShares International Select Dividend ETF | 0.45 | +82.6% | 0.86 | −6.5% | −10.4% | −10.7% | 21.1% | +18.8% |
| EDIV InternationalState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 0.41 | +69.9% | 0.84 | −15.3% | −6.2% | −27.4% | 20.5% | +18.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +160% | 0.85 | −18.7% | −9.4% | −17.5% | 24.2% | +19.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.39 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | 21.9% | +23.8% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.40 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | 26.3% | +36.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.44 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | 24.6% | +32.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.17 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | 20.8% | +23.4% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.31 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | 22.2% | +25.9% |
Common questions
What was HLT's worst drawdown?
HLT's deepest decline since it began trading in 2013 was 50.8%, from January to April 2020. It took nine months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because HLT launched in December 2013, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were HLT's best and worst years?
Over 12 full calendar years, HLT's best year was 2019, when it returned 55.5%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -18.7%.
Is there a better investment than HLT?
Few investments have done better on both counts: only 16 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HLT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ABBV, GILD and WELL.
Is HLT more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. HLT's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.8%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, HLT's return lands within 26.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is HLT's Sharpe ratio?
HLT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.85, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so HLT earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is HLT with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, HLT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.71 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against HLT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a HLT holding.
What are the best alternatives to HLT?
None of the 13 popular alternatives we compared outperformed HLT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about HLT's strength than about its alternatives.
Did HLT outperform the S&P 500?
HLT finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of 12 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +16.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did HLT do in stock market crashes?
HLT fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the six major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when HLT fell 34.1% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies HLT?
These had a low correlation with HLT over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.46), SMH (correlation 0.47) and GLD (correlation 0.04); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.39), CLS (correlation 0.40) and FIX (correlation 0.44). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than HLT's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of HLT's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.