Relative Intelligence · Banks

How Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on BNY alone. It places BNY (Bank of New York Mellon Corp) against 9 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where BNY stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: BNY's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, BNY fell 7.7% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is BNY's own: it fell 7.7% over the past 3 months while the banks ETF XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 0.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsBNY has run far ahead of the market, rising 35.3% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (272% against 89.3%). BNY lagged its bank peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termBNY turned $10,000 into $44,100 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. BNY's 10-year return of 341% puts it ahead of 77% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashBNY fell harder than the S&P 500 in six of seven sell-offs. The late-2018 sell-off was the exception: BNY fell 16.2%, less than the S&P 500's 19.3%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationBNY is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.68 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.69 with the total US market, more closely than 97% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- HSBC (banks) earned more than BNY over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 33.1% a year at 25.9% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 24.4%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BNY with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them COR (Cencora) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund).
How much would $10,000 in BNY have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in BNY over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of BNY over the same span and BNY's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in BNY at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $121,131 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of BNY, and LLY finished highest, at $396,376.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 461 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BNY; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LLY$396,376+3,864% total · +13.5% a year
- MCK$208,304+1,983% total · +11.0% a year
- JPM$189,407+1,794% total · +10.7% a year
- SCHW$171,783+1,618% total · +10.3% a year
- CIB$157,654+1,477% total · +10.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- BNY$121,131+1,111% total · +9.0% a year
- NTRS$104,731+947% total · +8.4% a year
- STT$96,326+863% total · +8.1% a year
- C$11,853+18.5% total · +0.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 310 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BNY; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BBVA$57,750+478% total · +42.0% a year
- SMFG$44,827+348% total · +35.0% a year
- MUFG$44,537+345% total · +34.8% a year
- CIB$41,844+318% total · +33.1% a year
- KB$32,844+228% total · +26.9% a year
- BNY$31,954+220% total · +26.2% a year
- STT$23,984+140% total · +19.1% a year
- JPM$22,905+129% total · +18.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- BLK$14,247+42.5% total · +7.3% a year
BNY at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- BNY's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 72.3%, from August 1989 to October 1990. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, BNY's best was 1997, when it returned 75.3%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 40.4%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- BNY is 12.5% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $98B
- Industry
- Investment - Banking & Investment Services
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +35.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +272%+55.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +179%+22.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +341%+16.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +75.3%1997
- Worst calendar year
- −40.4%2008
- Losing years
- 8 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 24.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.97return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −72.3%Aug 1989 to Oct 1990
- From its all-time high
- −12.5%below the peak
BNY against the whole market
Where BNY ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does BNY rank among all stocks?
This section ranks BNY on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how BNY stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), BNY ranks in the top 4% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | BNY | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +35.3% | 845 of 3,287 | top 26% |
| 3-year return | +272% | 261 of 3,017 | top 9% |
| 5-year return | +179% | 368 of 2,893 | top 13% |
| 10-year return | +341% | 500 of 2,202 | top 23% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 24.4% | 285 of 2,893 | top 10% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.97 | 118 of 2,893 | top 4% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −50.5% | 475 of 2,187 | top 22% |
What has beaten BNY on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). BNY sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than BNY with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- One stock and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than BNY over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half BNY's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 22% less than BNY's 24.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.97 for BNY.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to BNY. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than BNY?
Investments that beat BNY over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, HSBC (banks) earned more than BNY over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 33.1% a year at 25.9% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 24.4%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BNY with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them COR and DXJ.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat BNY over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks BNY's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than BNY follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than BNY's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× BNY's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than BNY's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with BNY?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.68 | 0.09% | |||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus BNY's specific themes. 7 of 134 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.64 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.40 | — | ||
CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Higher return in most periods | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.40 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +25.3% | 34.4% | 0.83 | −64.1% | +390% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.57 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 46 of 3,490 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.30 | 0.48% | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.05 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.19 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.10 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.24 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.35 | — | ||
| On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatility | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.51 | — | ||
DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.32 | 0.45% | |
What these numbers mean for BNY
- Annual return
- BNY returned 22.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $27,900. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- BNY's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.4%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BNY's return lands within 24.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- BNY's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.97, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BNY earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- BNY's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 50.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 50.5% fall takes a 102% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, BNY's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.68 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BNY instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BNY holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than BNY with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with BNY | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.30 | 0.48% |
| 2 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.35 | — |
BNY against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against BNY, compared period by period and year by year.
How do BNY's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at BNY, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the nine popular alternatives earned more than BNY over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Seven of the nine popular alternatives earned less than BNY over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, BNY returned 22.7% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (24.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than BNY with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| BNY This pageBank of New York Mellon Corp | +22.7% | 24.4% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | +17.3% | 24.3% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | +15.1% | 29.4% |
| STT State Street Corporation | +14.4% | 29.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | +8.9% | 29.3% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | +7.1% | 27.1% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | +5.4% | 21.8% |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | +4.7% | 25.2% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | +3.6% | 31.9% |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | −19.7% | 33.9% |
Has BNY consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares BNY with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than BNY helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the nine popular alternatives outperformed BNY in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was JPM.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than BNY over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp (this page) | — | −6.3% | −7.7% | +7.4% | +24.8% | +35.3% | +272% | +179% | +341% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | — | $98B | — |
| JPM Banks - DiversifiedJPMorgan Chase & Co. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −4.3% | −0.6% | +6.8% | +5.0% | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | — | $891B | — |
| BLK Asset ManagementBlackRock, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +3.5% | +7.6% | +8.8% | +5.7% | −0.6% | +96.3% | +41.1% | +313% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | — | $175B | — |
| STT Asset ManagementState Street Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | −9.2% | −8.3% | +12.1% | +31.3% | +47.9% | +181% | +96.2% | +212% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −59.6% | — | $46B | — |
| SSNC Software - ApplicationSS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +8.1% | +25.5% | +22.8% | +2.5% | +8.3% | +81.0% | +26.0% | +200% | 25.2% | 0.31 | −48.9% | — | $20B | — |
| ICE Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesIntercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +2.1% | +12.4% | −0.6% | +0.1% | +3.5% | +52.4% | +30.0% | +240% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | — | $89B | — |
| C Banks - DiversifiedCitigroup Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −9.3% | −4.3% | −7.0% | +4.8% | +26.0% | +238% | +102% | +234% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | — | $206B | — |
| FIS Information Technology ServicesFidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +3.5% | −12.8% | −22.9% | −42.7% | −44.3% | −21.6% | −66.6% | −41.3% | 33.9% | -0.47 | −76.0% | — | $19B | — |
| SCHW Financial - Capital MarketsThe Charles Schwab Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −15.0% | −11.1% | −1.8% | −9.6% | −3.1% | +86.2% | +19.1% | +221% | 31.9% | 0.27 | −51.1% | — | $157B | — |
| NTRS Asset ManagementNorthern Trust Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −7.5% | −9.1% | +5.0% | +20.6% | +31.1% | +180% | +52.9% | +205% | 29.3% | 0.44 | −50.0% | — | $30B | — |
How did BNY do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where BNY ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with BNY and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- BNY finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, JPM came out ahead of BNY most often, in 18 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, BNY finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in seven. In 2025, it ranked 2 of 10.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of BNY; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places BNY among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of BNY | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNY This pageBank of New York Mellon Corp | — | +54.4% | +51.9% | +18.5% | −19.1% | +40.6% | −12.9% | +9.6% | −10.8% | +15.7% | +17.1% | +3.3% | +18.3% | +38.6% | +32.1% | −32.8% | +9.3% | +0.9% | −40.4% | +20.0% | +26.8% | −1.2% | +4.8% | +45.2% | −38.9% | −23.4% | +42.7% | +1.6% | +41.6% | +75.3% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 29 | 2 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 5 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 5 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 3 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 6 of 9 | 6 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 8 of 8 | 5 of 8 | 2 of 8 | 7 of 8 | 5 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 6 of 6 | 2 of 6 | 5 of 6 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 15 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 18 of 29 | +37.3% | +44.3% | +30.6% | −12.6% | +27.8% | −5.5% | +47.3% | −6.6% | +26.8% | +34.5% | +8.4% | +9.9% | +36.7% | +36.2% | −19.9% | +2.3% | +34.4% | −25.1% | −6.9% | +25.7% | +5.7% | +10.0% | +60.5% | −30.7% | −17.4% | −10.1% | +11.7% | +32.9% | +25.5% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 14 of 26 | +6.6% | +29.3% | +17.9% | −20.4% | +29.4% | +47.2% | +31.9% | −21.6% | +38.2% | +14.6% | −2.4% | +15.7% | +57.0% | +19.8% | −3.6% | −15.9% | +76.6% | −37.0% | +45.1% | +41.8% | +42.4% | +47.6% | +35.9% | −5.5% | −0.7% | +144% | — | — | — |
| STT State Street Corporation | 15 of 29 | +35.5% | +30.2% | +3.5% | −13.8% | +31.0% | −4.8% | +29.3% | −34.0% | +27.8% | +19.8% | −13.9% | +8.7% | +58.6% | +19.2% | −11.4% | +6.6% | +10.8% | −50.7% | +21.9% | +23.2% | +14.5% | −4.4% | +35.4% | −24.5% | −15.2% | +71.1% | +5.0% | +21.5% | +81.6% |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 9 of 15 | +16.8% | +25.8% | +19.2% | −35.7% | +13.7% | +19.5% | +37.2% | +12.1% | +42.5% | −15.6% | +17.7% | +32.5% | +91.6% | +27.9% | −11.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 11 of 20 | +9.9% | +17.5% | +27.1% | −23.9% | +19.9% | +26.2% | +24.5% | +8.1% | +26.6% | +11.5% | +18.3% | −1.3% | +82.2% | +2.7% | +1.2% | +6.1% | +36.2% | −57.2% | +78.4% | +197% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 10 of 29 | +70.4% | +41.9% | +19.0% | −22.1% | +0.9% | −19.7% | +57.9% | −28.5% | +27.0% | +15.9% | −4.1% | +3.9% | +31.8% | +50.5% | −44.3% | +42.9% | −50.6% | −75.9% | −44.8% | +19.6% | +4.6% | +2.8% | +41.6% | −20.4% | +0.1% | +23.6% | +70.2% | −6.8% | +79.9% |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 14 of 24 | −15.8% | +37.0% | −8.2% | −36.5% | −21.9% | +2.7% | +37.2% | +10.3% | +26.1% | +26.6% | −1.0% | +17.8% | +57.4% | +34.1% | −2.2% | +17.7% | +45.4% | +282% | +4.7% | +19.1% | +15.6% | +9.6% | +34.5% | −28.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 17 of 29 | +36.6% | +9.2% | −16.0% | +0.1% | +60.2% | +13.6% | +16.4% | −18.4% | +31.1% | +21.0% | +9.9% | +17.2% | +83.3% | +29.8% | −33.1% | −7.8% | +18.1% | −36.1% | +40.0% | +32.8% | +23.5% | +1.7% | +9.5% | −29.5% | −45.4% | +11.4% | +36.3% | +102% | +97.6% |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 13 of 29 | +36.9% | +25.6% | −1.0% | −23.8% | +31.6% | −9.3% | +30.6% | −14.7% | +14.2% | +26.1% | +9.1% | +11.1% | +26.1% | +29.9% | −26.5% | +8.1% | +2.7% | −30.8% | +28.2% | +19.1% | +8.6% | +6.7% | +34.5% | −40.9% | −25.4% | +55.1% | +22.5% | +26.7% | +95.2% |
Risk and diversification
How BNY has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were BNY's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents BNY's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of BNY's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after BNY fell 62.4% from December 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until May 2015, six years later.
Green means BNY fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | BNY fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −72.3% | — | Aug 1989 | Oct 1990 | 14 months | Oct 1992 | 2 years |
| Dot-com bust | −63.2% | −41.8% | Nov 2000 | Mar 2003 | 2.3 years | Oct 2007 | 4.6 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −62.4% | −53.3% | Dec 2007 | Mar 2009 | 15 months | May 2015 | 6.2 years |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −50.5% | −16.2% | Jan 2018 | Mar 2020 | 2.2 years | Aug 2021 | 17 months |
| No named crash | −43.9% | — | Aug 1987 | Dec 1987 | 4 months | Feb 1989 | 14 months |
How did BNY do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far BNY, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- BNY fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when BNY fell 40.5% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, FIS held up best, falling less than BNY in seven of the nine crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than BNY.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNY This pageBank of New York Mellon Corp | — | −11.4% | −40.5% | −40.1% | −16.2% | −5.4% | −27.0% | −30.9% | −0.5% | −62.4% | −62.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 3 of 10 | −5.4% | −37.9% | −42.5% | −21.3% | −5.6% | −22.0% | −32.1% | −0.1% | −67.7% | −74.0% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −7.2% | −40.8% | −42.3% | −25.2% | −7.1% | −19.9% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −33.0% |
| STT State Street Corporation | 2 of 10 | −14.6% | −41.4% | −45.1% | −32.3% | −8.3% | −34.1% | −28.3% | −1.9% | −82.3% | −50.7% |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 8 | −7.1% | −44.3% | −47.2% | −26.7% | −3.3% | −26.4% | −30.9% | −0.9% | — | — |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −7.0% | −33.8% | −33.0% | −13.3% | −9.4% | −12.7% | −19.3% | −2.0% | −73.9% | — |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 2 of 10 | −11.7% | −39.2% | −54.8% | −33.1% | −6.7% | −40.3% | −42.6% | −1.0% | −97.7% | −52.7% |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 7 of 9 | −20.2% | −38.5% | −34.7% | −13.1% | −8.0% | −23.4% | −23.3% | 0.0% | −46.4% | — |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 3 of 10 | −31.9% | −36.9% | −41.5% | −26.5% | −8.2% | −37.0% | −28.9% | −5.5% | −56.0% | −83.1% |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 6 of 10 | −10.7% | −36.0% | −39.0% | −27.2% | −8.1% | −29.9% | −25.4% | 0.0% | −60.5% | −65.2% |
How closely does BNY move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares BNY with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Only JPM and SCHW had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than BNY's 0.96, out of nine popular alternatives with the same record.
- JPM took just 103% of the S&P 500's losses, against 120% for BNY, while still keeping 117% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, BNY captured 115% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 120% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.08. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than BNY's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNY This pageBank of New York Mellon Corp | 115% | 120% | 0.96 | 1.08 |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.14 | 1.09 |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 89% | 90% | 0.99 | 0.91 |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 88% | 94% | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 111% | 136% | 0.82 | 1.18 |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 127% | 157% | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 131% | 165% | 0.80 | 1.49 |
| STT State Street Corporation | 128% | 166% | 0.77 | 1.48 |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 113% | 153% | 0.74 | 1.32 |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 54% | 150% | 0.36 | 0.82 |
What diversifies BNY?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with BNY's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing BNY with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in BNY into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+26.2% for BNY alone, +25.3% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and GLD have moved largely independently of BNY over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.40 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in five of the eight calendar years in which BNY lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which BNY lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% BNY and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2018 | 2011 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp (this page) | 1.00 | +179% | 0.97 | −19.1% | −12.9% | −10.8% | −32.8% | −40.4% | −1.2% | −38.9% | −23.4% | 24.5% | +26.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.30 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +3.9% | −19.8% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | 20.5% | +26.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.40 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | +55.5% | −9.1% | +6.8% | −44.7% | +10.8% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 23.3% | +29.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.09 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | +24.8% | −1.9% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | — | 20.2% | +25.3% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.38 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −32.7% | −18.2% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +40.1% | −14.8% | −18.2% | 22.1% | +26.3% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.42 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | +31.5% | −9.9% | −21.8% | −45.3% | +4.7% | −24.4% | +2.1% | 22.2% | +25.9% |
| EDIV InternationalState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 0.41 | +69.9% | 0.84 | −15.3% | −10.0% | −6.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.8% | +23.5% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.32 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +21.6% | +1.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.9% | +23.7% |
| DBA AlternativesInvesco DB Agriculture Fund | 0.16 | +66.4% | 0.81 | +2.5% | −2.5% | −8.7% | −10.7% | −19.1% | — | — | — | 20.1% | +23.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2018 | 2011 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp (this page) | 1.00 | +179% | 0.97 | −19.1% | −12.9% | −10.8% | −32.8% | −40.4% | −1.2% | −38.9% | −23.4% | 24.5% | +26.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.15 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | +10.1% | −24.5% | +8.1% | −39.6% | +18.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | 21.0% | +29.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.40 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −2.4% | −16.3% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.2% | −65.1% | −25.6% | 26.5% | +42.6% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.42 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +6.7% | +0.8% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +20.1% | −9.4% | +73.7% | 24.7% | +38.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.10 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +27.1% | −28.4% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +64.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | 20.7% | +28.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.30 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −27.4% | −8.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 22.4% | +31.5% |
Common questions
What was BNY's worst drawdown?
BNY's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 72.3%, from August 1989 to October 1990. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were BNY's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, BNY's best year was 1997, when it returned 75.3%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -40.4%.
Is there a better investment than BNY?
Looking beyond its popular alternatives, HSBC (banks) earned more than BNY over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 33.1% a year at 25.9% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 24.4%. Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BNY with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them COR and DXJ.
Is BNY more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. BNY's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.4%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BNY's return lands within 24.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is BNY's Sharpe ratio?
BNY's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.97, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BNY earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is BNY with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, BNY's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.68 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BNY instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BNY holding.
What are the best alternatives to BNY?
None of the nine popular alternatives we compared outperformed BNY in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about BNY's strength than about its alternatives.
Did BNY outperform the S&P 500?
BNY finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +54.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did BNY do in stock market crashes?
BNY fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when BNY fell 40.5% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies BNY?
These had a low correlation with BNY over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.30), SMH (correlation 0.40) and GLD (correlation 0.09); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.15), CLS (correlation 0.40) and FIX (correlation 0.42). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than BNY's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of BNY's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to BNY
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
BLKBlackRock
STTState Street
ICEIntercontinental Exchange
CCitigroup
SCHWCharles Schwab