Relative Intelligence · Gold Mining

How AngloGold Ashanti (AU) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on AU alone. It places AU (AngloGold Ashanti Plc) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where AU stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: AU's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowAU has gone against the market, falling 13.1% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. AU is 26.7% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?AU's 22.1% gain over the past 3 months is part of a broader gold mining rally: the gold mining ETF GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) rose 21.7%, with NEM (Newmont, up 31.2%) and AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines, up 36.9%). Its gold mining peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: AEM rose 36.9%, while KGC (Kinross Gold) rose 5.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, AU rose 26.2% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (416% against 89.3%). AU lagged its gold mining peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termAU turned $10,000 into $78,100 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. AU's 10-year return of 681% puts it ahead of 91% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAU fell harder than the S&P 500 in five of seven sell-offs. The late-2018 sell-off was the exception: AU fell 10.7%, less than the S&P 500's 19.3%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, AU has a correlation of 0.20 over 5 years, less closely than 86% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. Over 10 years, AU's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.61: 88% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 40% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- IAG (Iamgold) was ahead of AU in most short and long periods.
- Nearby categories and themes
- ATI (metals & mining) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace, aerospace & defense) earned more than AU with less volatility over the past 5 years. ATI returned 61.8% a year at 42.9% volatility, against 40.4% a year at 49.9%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 22 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than AU with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AVGO (Broadcom), PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras) and PBR-A (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras).
How much would $10,000 in AU have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in AU over the past 28 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of AU over the same span and AU's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in AU at the end of September 1998 would have grown to $64,042 by September 2026, less than the $121,630 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of AU, and RGLD finished highest, at $718,022.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1998 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 766 of the 1,106 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AU; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- RGLD$718,022+7,080% total · +16.5% a year
- AEM$581,807+5,718% total · +15.6% a year
- GFI$142,193+1,322% total · +9.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$121,630+1,116% total · +9.3% a year
- HWM$114,404+1,044% total · +9.1% a year
- NEM$73,369+634% total · +7.4% a year
- AU$64,042+540% total · +6.9% a year
- HMY$50,117+401% total · +5.9% a year
- DRD$13,533+35.3% total · +1.1% a year
- CDE$2,410−75.9% total · −5.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 60 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AU; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CRS$125,806+1,158% total · +65.9% a year
- ATI$113,890+1,039% total · +62.7% a year
- IAG$81,461+715% total · +52.1% a year
- HWM$73,554+636% total · +49.0% a year
- ASX$70,798+608% total · +47.9% a year
- AU$67,300+573% total · +46.4% a year
- GFI$52,960+430% total · +39.6% a year
- CDE$28,571+186% total · +23.4% a year
- NEM$24,375+144% total · +19.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
AU at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- AU is still 26.7% below its all-time high.
- AU's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 89.7%, from January 2006 to August 2015. It took about ten years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 28 full calendar years, AU's best was 2025, when it returned 288%, and its worst was 2013, when it lost 62.4%. It lost money in 15 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $46B
- Industry
- Gold
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +26.2%total return
- Past 3 years
- +416%+72.8% a year
- Past 5 years
- +445%+40.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +681%+22.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +288%2025
- Worst calendar year
- −62.4%2013
- Losing years
- 15 of 28full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 49.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.93return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −89.7%Jan 2006 to Aug 2015
- From its all-time high
- −26.7%below the peak
AU against the whole market
Where AU ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does AU rank among all stocks?
This section ranks AU on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how AU stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- AU's 5-year return ranks in the top 3% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million with 5 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | AU | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +26.2% | 1,076 of 3,287 | top 33% |
| 3-year return | +416% | 139 of 3,017 | top 5% |
| 5-year return | +445% | 82 of 2,893 | top 3% |
| 10-year return | +681% | 200 of 2,202 | top 9% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 49.9% | 1,917 of 2,893 | bottom 35% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.93 | 146 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −66.3% | 1,154 of 2,187 | bottom 48% |
What has beaten AU on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). AU sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than AU with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 22 stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than AU over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half AU's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, 6% less than AU's 49.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.46 against 0.93 for AU.
- None of AU's popular alternatives made it, but HWM (aerospace & defense) did: 47.3% a year at 32.5% volatility, 35% less than AU's 49.9%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to AU; faint dots are 15 more of the 22 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than AU?
Investments that beat AU over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among AU's popular alternatives, IAG was ahead of AU in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ATI (metals & mining) and HWM (aerospace & defense) earned more than AU with less volatility over the past 5 years. ATI returned 61.8% a year at 42.9% volatility, against 40.4% a year at 49.9%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 22 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than AU with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AVGO, PBR and PBR-A.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat AU over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks AU's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than AU follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than AU's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× AU's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than AU's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with AU?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +40.4% | 49.9% | 0.93 | −66.3% | +681% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.20 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against AU. 1 of 22 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
IAGIamgold Corporation · Gold Mining | Higher return in most periods | +43.9% | 60.9% | 0.90 | −86.4% | +343% | 0.81 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 4 shownEverything else in Gold Mining and Metals & Mining and the categories next to it (Gold, Silver, Aerospace & Defense), plus AU's specific themes. 4 of 73 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.12 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.16 | — | ||
CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,021% | 0.07 | — | |
ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.10 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 56 of 3,538 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.14 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.10 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | -0.08 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | -0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.08 | — | ||
COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | 0.08 | — | |
What these numbers mean for AU
- Annual return
- AU returned 40.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $54,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- AU's volatility over the past 5 years was 49.9%, 2.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AU's return lands within 49.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- AU's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.93, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AU earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- AU's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 66.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 66.3% fall takes a 197% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, AU's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.20 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AU instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AU holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 22 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than AU with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with AU | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.14 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.10 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | -0.08 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.08 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | -0.02 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.04 | — | |
| 7 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Same or nearby category | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.12 | — |
| 8 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.08 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.22 | — | |
| 10 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.10 | — |
| 11 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | -0.13 | — |
| 12 | LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | 0.09 | — |
| 13 | TRMDTORM plc · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +54.3% | 45.9% | 1.18 | −60.6% | — | -0.07 | — |
| 14 | Same or nearby category | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.16 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.10 | — | |
| 16 | CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | Same or nearby category | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,021% | 0.07 | — |
| 17 | FTITechnipFMC plc · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +54.1% | 41.3% | 1.26 | −85.8% | +178% | 0.09 | — |
| 18 | JXNJackson Financial Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +41.7% | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | — | 0.04 | — |
| 19 | TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +50.5% | 45.1% | 1.14 | −63.4% | +490% | 0.03 | — |
| 20 | TENTsakos Energy Navigation Limited · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +46.9% | 46.3% | 1.07 | −68.7% | +211% | -0.07 | — |
| 21 | TKTeekay Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +47.1% | 41.7% | 1.13 | −83.8% | +244% | 0.10 | — |
| 22 | ASCArdmore Shipping Corporation · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +41.7% | 44.8% | 1.01 | −71.2% | +259% | -0.01 | — |
AU against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against AU, compared period by period and year by year.
How do AU's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at AU, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 22 popular alternatives earned more than AU over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, AU returned 40.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (49.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than AU with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| IAG Iamgold Corporation | +43.9% | 60.9% |
| AU This pageAngloGold Ashanti Plc | +40.4% | 49.9% |
| OGC OceanaGold Corporation | +37.1% | 52.9% |
| HMY Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited | +36.0% | 59.3% |
| GFI Gold Fields Limited | +35.5% | 53.4% |
| KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | +32.7% | 45.6% |
| AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | +32.6% | 42.4% |
| EGO Eldorado Gold Corporation | +30.0% | 47.7% |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | +29.5% | 38.4% |
| WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | +27.5% | 36.9% |
| DRD DRDGOLD Limited | +27.0% | 52.3% |
| RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | +20.6% | 32.4% |
| B Barrick Mining Corporation | +18.9% | 37.3% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | +18.6% | 39.1% |
| CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | +18.3% | 69.4% |
| SLV iShares Silver Trust | +18.3% | 37.5% |
| GLD SPDR Gold Shares | +17.7% | 18.9% |
| FSM Fortuna Mining Corp. | +16.7% | 57.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | +12.5% | 31.3% |
| BTG B2Gold Corp. | +8.3% | 46.3% |
| SA Seabridge Gold Inc. | +7.5% | 53.5% |
| EQX Equinox Gold Corp. | +7.3% | 58.2% |
| NG NovaGold Resources Inc. | −3.3% | 61.9% |
Has AU consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares AU with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than AU helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 22 popular alternatives, IAG, outperformed AU in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- GLD earned more for the risk it took than AU (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than AU over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| AU AngloGold Ashanti Plc (this page) | — | −10.9% | +22.1% | −13.1% | +9.9% | +26.2% | +416% | +445% | +681% | 49.9% | 0.93 | −66.3% | — | $46B | — |
| IAG QualifiedIamgold Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | −11.8% | +27.2% | −4.1% | +9.5% | +29.9% | +637% | +517% | +343% | 60.9% | 0.90 | −86.4% | — | $10B | — |
| GFI GoldGold Fields Limited | 0/5 short1/3 long | −13.7% | +18.6% | −24.0% | −12.6% | −13.0% | +187% | +356% | +1,008% | 53.4% | 0.84 | −56.2% | — | $32B | — |
| CDE GoldCoeur Mining, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −22.5% | +6.9% | −23.4% | −13.7% | −31.3% | +480% | +131% | +33.9% | 69.4% | 0.59 | −83.3% | — | $16B | — |
| NEM GoldNewmont Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | −5.1% | +31.2% | +2.2% | +16.1% | +24.3% | +219% | +135% | +304% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | — | $123B | — |
| BTG GoldB2Gold Corp. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −3.0% | +42.9% | +6.1% | +16.9% | −7.3% | +72.8% | +49.0% | +139% | 46.3% | 0.40 | −63.2% | — | $6.9B | — |
| WPM GoldWheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −11.1% | +27.0% | −11.8% | +11.8% | +25.2% | +212% | +236% | +510% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | — | $60B | — |
| FNV GoldFranco-Nevada Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | −7.9% | +20.7% | −6.2% | +16.2% | +18.4% | +78.8% | +79.9% | +303% | 31.3% | 0.53 | −37.1% | — | $47B | — |
| RGLD GoldRoyal Gold, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.3% | +27.7% | −9.4% | +8.7% | +24.0% | +124% | +155% | +282% | 32.4% | 0.74 | −49.5% | — | $20B | — |
| DRD GoldDRDGOLD Limited | 2/5 short0/3 long | −1.8% | +32.4% | −15.8% | −13.4% | −9.9% | +195% | +230% | +589% | 52.3% | 0.72 | −74.0% | — | $2.2B | — |
| HMY GoldHarmony Gold Mining Company Limited | 2/5 short0/3 long | −9.6% | +19.9% | −4.4% | −10.4% | −13.2% | +265% | +366% | +504% | 59.3% | 0.82 | −71.1% | — | $11B | — |
| AEM GoldAgnico Eagle Mines Limited | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.7% | +36.9% | −13.5% | +10.0% | +5.3% | +293% | +264% | +352% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | — | $94B | — |
| B GoldBarrick Mining Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.3% | +16.3% | −5.1% | −6.8% | +18.8% | +156% | +138% | +194% | 37.3% | 0.65 | −53.9% | — | $67B | — |
| EGO GoldEldorado Gold Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −17.0% | +27.0% | +5.2% | −0.1% | +23.1% | +247% | +271% | +89.1% | 47.7% | 0.79 | −86.2% | — | $9.2B | — |
| FSM GoldFortuna Mining Corp. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −11.7% | +29.4% | −2.4% | +8.9% | +16.7% | +242% | +116% | +53.5% | 57.6% | 0.56 | −78.1% | — | $3.1B | — |
| EQX GoldEquinox Gold Corp. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −9.0% | +27.6% | −27.9% | −18.9% | −9.0% | +144% | +42.2% | — | 58.2% | 0.41 | −81.0% | — | $13B | — |
| AGI GoldAlamos Gold Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −9.6% | +13.1% | −34.8% | −16.9% | −9.3% | +154% | +310% | +294% | 42.4% | 0.88 | −66.1% | — | $13B | — |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.2% | +2.7% | −14.6% | −5.2% | −6.3% | +106% | +126% | +213% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | 0.40% | $143B | — |
| OGC GoldOceanaGold Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.5% | +19.4% | −22.1% | −5.2% | +7.6% | +382% | +385% | +176% | 52.9% | 0.86 | −77.0% | — | $5.9B | — |
| NG GoldNovaGold Resources Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −12.1% | +23.9% | −39.8% | −29.7% | −36.0% | +69.4% | −15.3% | +41.3% | 61.9% | 0.25 | −81.2% | — | $2.8B | — |
| KGC GoldKinross Gold Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −14.9% | +5.1% | −31.7% | −16.1% | −8.3% | +356% | +311% | +572% | 45.6% | 0.85 | −67.9% | — | $28B | — |
| SLV CommoditiesiShares Silver Trust | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.6% | +2.2% | −27.8% | −20.7% | +9.2% | +144% | +131% | +213% | 37.5% | 0.64 | −52.4% | 0.50% | $29B | — |
| SA GoldSeabridge Gold Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −16.5% | +4.2% | −21.8% | −13.4% | −2.9% | +123% | +43.5% | +127% | 53.5% | 0.40 | −61.1% | — | $2.8B | — |
How did AU do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where AU ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with AU and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- AU finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 28 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, GLD came out ahead of AU most often, in 15 of the 21 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, AU finished in the top quarter in three of 28 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 1 of 23.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of AU; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places AU among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of AU | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU This pageAngloGold Ashanti Plc | — | +288% | +25.5% | −2.7% | −5.1% | −4.9% | +1.9% | +78.8% | +24.1% | −2.2% | +48.1% | −18.4% | −25.8% | −62.4% | −24.9% | −13.1% | +23.1% | +45.6% | −32.0% | −8.0% | −3.7% | +38.0% | −20.6% | +41.9% | +99.8% | +28.1% | −38.2% | +39.8% | −37.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 28 | 1 of 23 | 9 of 23 | 17 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 7 of 23 | 20 of 23 | 8 of 23 | 2 of 22 | 13 of 22 | 15 of 22 | 10 of 22 | 17 of 22 | 19 of 22 | 20 of 22 | 13 of 22 | 18 of 22 | 13 of 22 | 15 of 20 | 12 of 18 | 15 of 17 | 8 of 16 | 11 of 14 | 4 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 4 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 14 of 28 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +33.5% |
| IAG Iamgold Corporation | 11 of 22 | +220% | +104% | −1.9% | −17.6% | −14.7% | −1.6% | +1.4% | −36.9% | +51.4% | +171% | −47.4% | −18.9% | −70.1% | −26.0% | −9.8% | +14.3% | +157% | −23.8% | −7.3% | +13.4% | +18.6% | −3.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GFI Gold Fields Limited | 17 of 28 | +240% | −6.2% | +44.8% | −2.7% | +23.4% | +42.9% | +89.8% | −16.9% | +46.3% | +9.7% | −38.6% | +42.8% | −70.0% | −15.2% | −14.6% | +40.1% | +33.4% | −28.3% | −23.7% | +8.4% | +42.9% | −9.8% | +2.3% | +198% | +44.8% | −22.5% | +16.2% | −32.5% |
| CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | 12 of 28 | +212% | +75.1% | −3.0% | −33.2% | −51.3% | +28.1% | +80.9% | −40.5% | −17.5% | +266% | −51.4% | −52.9% | −55.9% | +1.9% | −11.7% | +51.3% | +105% | −82.2% | −0.2% | +23.7% | +1.8% | −32.0% | +201% | +140% | −14.6% | −72.7% | −25.7% | −40.4% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 16 of 28 | +173% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −20.8% | +7.4% | +40.3% | +30.5% | −6.2% | +10.9% | +90.1% | −4.4% | −17.2% | −48.5% | −20.4% | −0.6% | +31.0% | +17.3% | −15.9% | +9.1% | −14.8% | +21.4% | −8.1% | +68.2% | +52.6% | +12.7% | −29.9% | +35.0% | −34.1% |
| BTG B2Gold Corp. | 9 of 17 | +89.0% | −18.1% | −7.4% | −5.2% | −27.0% | +42.5% | +37.6% | −5.8% | +30.6% | +133% | −37.1% | −19.6% | −43.6% | +16.2% | +13.7% | +131% | +225% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 12 of 20 | +111% | +15.2% | +27.9% | −7.6% | +4.2% | +41.8% | +54.7% | −10.0% | +16.1% | +57.1% | −38.2% | +1.9% | −43.0% | +25.9% | −25.4% | +160% | +131% | −61.8% | +61.9% | +80.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 12 of 18 | +77.8% | +7.4% | −17.9% | −0.4% | +11.3% | +22.3% | +48.9% | −11.0% | +35.5% | +32.4% | −5.3% | +22.6% | −27.6% | +51.8% | +15.3% | +24.9% | +56.8% | +15.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 16 of 28 | +70.4% | +10.4% | +8.7% | +8.5% | 0.0% | −12.1% | +44.3% | +5.5% | +31.3% | +76.7% | −41.1% | +37.8% | −42.3% | +21.6% | +24.4% | +16.7% | −3.6% | +62.9% | −14.4% | +4.3% | +92.3% | −12.2% | −15.7% | +384% | +82.3% | −19.1% | 0.0% | −64.5% |
| DRD DRDGOLD Limited | 11 of 28 | +267% | +11.5% | +13.2% | −7.7% | −23.4% | +141% | +153% | −35.4% | −37.8% | +262% | +9.3% | −57.9% | −52.0% | +51.1% | +13.2% | −27.8% | +23.5% | −18.8% | −21.1% | −37.5% | −6.5% | −51.4% | −21.7% | +193% | +111% | −63.2% | −35.2% | −79.7% |
| HMY Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited | 14 of 28 | +145% | +35.3% | +82.8% | −16.5% | −10.3% | +29.0% | +102% | −4.2% | −12.6% | +140% | −50.9% | −25.0% | −71.5% | −22.1% | −6.6% | +24.0% | −6.8% | +6.5% | −34.6% | +20.7% | +40.8% | −42.5% | −1.1% | +168% | +43.3% | −23.5% | +36.1% | −71.4% |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 19 of 28 | +120% | +46.0% | +9.0% | +1.1% | −22.8% | +16.2% | +54.2% | −11.5% | +10.5% | +61.2% | +6.8% | −4.7% | −48.3% | +47.1% | −52.1% | +42.5% | +5.6% | −5.8% | +32.9% | +109% | +43.9% | +14.2% | −18.6% | +50.8% | +65.0% | −19.2% | +82.3% | −61.3% |
| B Barrick Mining Corporation | 13 of 28 | +187% | −12.3% | +7.9% | −6.2% | −13.4% | +24.2% | +40.1% | −5.6% | −8.6% | +118% | −30.6% | −38.2% | −48.5% | −21.1% | −14.0% | +36.7% | +8.9% | −10.8% | +38.2% | +11.0% | +16.0% | +7.8% | +49.0% | −1.5% | −1.5% | −6.3% | −8.4% | −34.8% |
| EGO Eldorado Gold Corporation | 13 of 22 | +142% | +14.6% | +55.2% | −10.7% | −29.5% | +65.2% | +179% | −59.8% | −55.4% | +8.4% | −51.0% | +7.1% | −55.3% | −5.0% | −25.7% | +31.4% | +78.3% | +37.0% | +7.4% | +10.2% | +66.0% | −8.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FSM Fortuna Mining Corp. | 10 of 18 | +129% | +11.1% | +2.9% | −3.9% | −52.7% | +102% | +12.1% | −30.3% | −7.6% | +151% | −50.5% | +58.5% | −31.2% | −24.0% | +14.6% | +141% | +249% | −81.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EQX Equinox Gold Corp. | 3 of 7 | +180% | +2.7% | +48.9% | −51.4% | −34.6% | +34.2% | +107% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 14 of 22 | +110% | +37.8% | +34.3% | +32.9% | −11.0% | +46.6% | +68.4% | −44.5% | −4.7% | +109% | −53.6% | −39.9% | −30.0% | +4.5% | −10.2% | +60.1% | +75.7% | +23.4% | −33.7% | +50.7% | +84.4% | +44.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 15 of 21 | +63.7% | +26.7% | +12.7% | −0.8% | −4.2% | +24.8% | +17.9% | −1.9% | +12.8% | +8.0% | −10.7% | −2.2% | −28.3% | +6.6% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +24.0% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +22.6% | +17.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OGC OceanaGold Corporation | 11 of 17 | +244% | +44.2% | +1.4% | +9.8% | −11.8% | −1.0% | −45.6% | +41.0% | −10.5% | +54.0% | +10.0% | +10.9% | −45.1% | +29.7% | −41.4% | +125% | +1,410% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NG NovaGold Resources Inc. | 9 of 22 | +180% | −11.0% | −37.5% | −12.8% | −29.1% | +7.9% | +127% | +0.5% | −13.8% | +8.3% | +42.7% | +16.1% | −43.7% | −46.8% | −40.6% | +133% | +317% | −82.0% | −52.4% | +88.6% | +17.4% | +55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 13 of 28 | +206% | +55.5% | +51.8% | −27.6% | −19.3% | +55.9% | +46.4% | −25.0% | +39.1% | +71.2% | −35.6% | −35.6% | −54.6% | −13.3% | −39.5% | +3.6% | +0.4% | +0.5% | +54.9% | +28.9% | +31.0% | −12.0% | +8.7% | +223% | +51.2% | −73.3% | −18.8% | −51.7% |
| SLV iShares Silver Trust | 13 of 19 | +145% | +20.9% | −1.1% | +2.4% | −12.4% | +47.3% | +14.9% | −9.2% | +5.8% | +14.6% | −12.4% | −19.5% | −36.3% | +9.0% | −10.7% | +82.5% | +47.7% | −23.8% | +14.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SA Seabridge Gold Inc. | 11 of 21 | +159% | −5.9% | −3.6% | −23.7% | −21.7% | +52.5% | +4.5% | +17.1% | +38.6% | −1.7% | +9.8% | +3.4% | −59.4% | +11.5% | −47.5% | +26.4% | +85.5% | −55.6% | +109% | +50.2% | +159% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How AU has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were AU's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents AU's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of AU's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: AU fell 89.7% from January 2006 to August 2015, while the S&P 500 rose 100%.
- The slowest recovery came after AU fell 83.2% from August 1987 to November 1992; it did not regain that peak until January 2006, 13 years later.
Green means AU fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | AU fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −89.7% | +100% | Jan 2006 | Aug 2015 | 9.6 years | Jun 2025 | 9.8 years |
| No named crash | −83.2% | — | Aug 1987 | Nov 1992 | 5.3 years | Jan 2006 | 13.2 years |
| No named crash | −39.9% | +8.7% | Mar 2026 | Jul 2026 | 4 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −28.7% | — | Apr 1987 | Jun 1987 | 2 months | Aug 1987 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −19.7% | −0.5% | Jan 2026 | Jan 2026 | Under a month | Feb 2026 | 1 month |
How did AU do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far AU, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, B held up best, falling less than AU in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- AU fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when AU fell 51.7% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than AU.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU This pageAngloGold Ashanti Plc | — | −0.3% | −51.7% | −37.1% | −10.7% | −9.4% | −36.9% | −15.3% | 0.0% | −71.5% | −50.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| IAG Iamgold Corporation | 1 of 9 | −1.4% | −73.6% | −48.4% | −28.6% | −6.1% | −45.5% | −19.2% | −0.5% | −74.8% | — |
| GFI Gold Fields Limited | 2 of 10 | 0.0% | −56.2% | −46.8% | −11.4% | −9.8% | −41.3% | −14.3% | −4.3% | −73.7% | −46.9% |
| CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −1.4% | −51.7% | −59.3% | −34.4% | −12.3% | −56.0% | −30.5% | −1.9% | −93.0% | −83.2% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 6 of 10 | −1.0% | −51.8% | −24.5% | −9.5% | −6.0% | −20.2% | −12.0% | −2.3% | −61.5% | −53.0% |
| BTG B2Gold Corp. | 2 of 8 | −0.7% | −41.4% | −43.4% | −10.3% | −8.6% | −55.2% | −21.1% | 0.0% | — | — |
| WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 3 of 9 | 0.0% | −43.3% | −28.7% | −14.8% | −10.0% | −29.0% | −28.8% | 0.0% | −86.8% | — |
| FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 5 of 8 | −1.8% | −33.3% | −26.9% | −7.8% | −7.0% | −20.8% | −24.4% | −0.9% | — | — |
| RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 5 of 10 | 0.0% | −40.7% | −36.8% | −9.8% | −7.5% | −54.7% | −22.8% | −2.4% | −41.7% | −39.3% |
| DRD DRDGOLD Limited | 3 of 10 | −1.6% | −51.8% | −46.8% | −27.8% | −2.9% | −26.1% | −13.2% | −2.9% | −77.4% | −60.4% |
| HMY Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited | 3 of 10 | 0.0% | −62.6% | −54.3% | −29.1% | −1.9% | −54.3% | −22.1% | −2.0% | −61.3% | −48.2% |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 5 of 10 | 0.0% | −42.0% | −31.6% | −11.6% | −6.4% | −20.2% | −18.9% | −0.4% | −72.9% | −42.4% |
| B Barrick Mining Corporation | 7 of 10 | −0.3% | −43.6% | −28.6% | −8.7% | −4.9% | −27.8% | −16.9% | −1.9% | −65.8% | −40.3% |
| EGO Eldorado Gold Corporation | 2 of 9 | −1.2% | −57.7% | −52.8% | −40.5% | −7.3% | −49.9% | −24.4% | 0.0% | −69.3% | — |
| FSM Fortuna Mining Corp. | 2 of 9 | −1.9% | −53.0% | −54.7% | −28.0% | −7.8% | −34.3% | −31.4% | 0.0% | −92.2% | — |
| EQX Equinox Gold Corp. | 0 of 4 | 0.0% | −65.9% | −43.0% | −16.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 2 of 9 | −0.7% | −27.7% | −44.2% | −40.9% | −9.4% | −52.9% | −29.8% | −0.5% | −62.2% | — |
| GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 6 of 9 | 0.0% | −21.0% | −12.5% | −2.7% | −1.5% | −11.7% | −15.4% | −0.2% | −29.4% | — |
| OGC OceanaGold Corporation | 3 of 8 | −2.1% | −48.1% | −56.4% | −11.0% | −7.4% | −34.4% | −40.7% | −0.3% | — | — |
| NG NovaGold Resources Inc. | 3 of 9 | −1.5% | −50.1% | −38.3% | −14.6% | −3.2% | −20.8% | −44.8% | −3.8% | −97.9% | — |
| KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 2 of 10 | −1.2% | −49.9% | −41.7% | −18.4% | −5.2% | −40.7% | −21.8% | −2.1% | −71.4% | −75.8% |
| SLV iShares Silver Trust | 6 of 9 | 0.0% | −33.0% | −35.6% | −5.1% | −2.2% | −15.3% | −32.3% | 0.0% | −57.1% | — |
| SA Seabridge Gold Inc. | 1 of 9 | −0.2% | −51.3% | −54.2% | −22.0% | −7.0% | −38.3% | −31.7% | −3.1% | −81.8% | — |
How closely does AU move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares AU with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, AU captured 88% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 40% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.61. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only GLD and GFI had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than AU's 2.19, out of 21 popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than AU's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU This pageAngloGold Ashanti Plc | 88% | 40% | 2.19 | 0.61 |
| GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 40% | 3% | 12.41 | 0.14 |
| GFI Gold Fields Limited | 102% | 46% | 2.22 | 0.69 |
| WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 78% | 37% | 2.09 | 0.48 |
| DRD DRDGOLD Limited | 89% | 43% | 2.07 | 0.80 |
| HMY Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited | 89% | 57% | 1.57 | 1.07 |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 68% | 45% | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 69% | 47% | 1.48 | 0.49 |
| AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 76% | 52% | 1.45 | 0.80 |
| KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 100% | 70% | 1.42 | 0.83 |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 77% | 57% | 1.34 | 0.70 |
| B Barrick Mining Corporation | 57% | 43% | 1.34 | 0.40 |
| RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 69% | 54% | 1.28 | 0.56 |
| BTG B2Gold Corp. | 63% | 61% | 1.02 | 0.78 |
| SLV iShares Silver Trust | 78% | 79% | 0.98 | 0.58 |
| IAG Iamgold Corporation | 120% | 131% | 0.91 | 1.17 |
| SA Seabridge Gold Inc. | 88% | 110% | 0.81 | 0.91 |
| OGC OceanaGold Corporation | 113% | 143% | 0.79 | 0.98 |
| EGO Eldorado Gold Corporation | 82% | 115% | 0.71 | 1.06 |
| FSM Fortuna Mining Corp. | 81% | 128% | 0.63 | 1.10 |
| CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | 126% | 213% | 0.59 | 1.56 |
| NG NovaGold Resources Inc. | 51% | 91% | 0.56 | 0.80 |
What diversifies AU?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with AU's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing AU with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in AU into CLS would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+46.4% for AU alone, +65.3% for the mix).
- MCK made money in 11 of the 15 calendar years in which AU lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of AU over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.34 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which AU lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% AU and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2017 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2004 | 2000 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU AngloGold Ashanti Plc (this page) | 1.00 | +445% | 0.93 | −2.7% | −5.1% | −4.9% | −2.2% | −18.4% | −25.8% | −62.4% | −24.9% | −13.1% | −32.0% | −8.0% | −3.7% | −20.6% | −38.2% | −37.9% | 56.3% | +46.4% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.34 | +119% | 1.48 | +17.4% | +3.8% | +17.8% | +10.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45.7% | +42.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.19 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +6.0% | +18.0% | +22.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | +41.3% | +19.6% | −16.1% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | 45.6% | +45.3% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.24 | +101% | 1.04 | +8.0% | +10.4% | +23.1% | +1.1% | −25.3% | +23.8% | +16.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45.8% | +42.5% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.29 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +1.8% | +7.1% | +19.6% | +13.5% | −0.3% | +12.6% | +23.8% | +9.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45.9% | +41.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.14 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | −33.5% | +42.1% | +38.5% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +33.4% | +8.6% | +6.8% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −6.7% | −19.3% | — | — | 46.5% | +48.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.29 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | −5.1% | +19.6% | +16.7% | +4.1% | +3.4% | +26.4% | +20.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45.7% | +42.0% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.06 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | −10.4% | +22.7% | +27.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45.4% | +44.4% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.08 | +177% | 0.93 | −0.6% | +64.4% | +53.3% | −0.9% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +26.3% | +5.2% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +18.0% | +33.8% | +24.4% | — | 45.7% | +45.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2017 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2004 | 2000 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU AngloGold Ashanti Plc (this page) | 1.00 | +445% | 0.93 | −2.7% | −5.1% | −4.9% | −2.2% | −18.4% | −25.8% | −62.4% | −24.9% | −13.1% | −32.0% | −8.0% | −3.7% | −20.6% | −38.2% | −37.9% | 56.3% | +46.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.08 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | +54.1% | −0.4% | −12.7% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +66.0% | +3.8% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −5.8% | −4.7% | +108% | +29.1% | 45.7% | +48.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.11 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | +1.3% | +37.9% | −11.6% | −6.0% | +12.9% | +27.6% | +11.2% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −26.0% | −6.4% | −2.3% | — | 45.2% | +65.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | -0.02 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +17.0% | +89.0% | +32.1% | +67.7% | −10.4% | +61.7% | +15.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +38.9% | +40.0% | −71.1% | — | 45.7% | +59.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.18 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | +51.8% | +44.2% | +12.0% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +67.7% | +25.6% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.2% | −1.4% | +61.2% | +96.3% | 46.2% | +47.2% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.10 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | +86.6% | +61.0% | +34.8% | +17.4% | +0.4% | +48.6% | +94.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 46.1% | +50.9% |
Common questions
What was AU's worst drawdown?
AU's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 89.7%, from January 2006 to August 2015. It took about ten years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were AU's best and worst years?
Over 28 full calendar years, AU's best year was 2025, when it returned 288%. Its worst was 2013, with a return of -62.4%.
Is there a better investment than AU?
Among AU's popular alternatives, IAG was ahead of AU in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ATI (metals & mining) and HWM (aerospace & defense) earned more than AU with less volatility over the past 5 years. ATI returned 61.8% a year at 42.9% volatility, against 40.4% a year at 49.9%.
Is AU more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. AU's volatility over the past 5 years was 49.9%, 2.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AU's return lands within 49.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is AU's Sharpe ratio?
AU's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.93, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AU earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is AU with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, AU's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.20 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AU instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AU holding.
What are the best alternatives to AU?
Of the 22 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed AU in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: IAG.
Did AU outperform the S&P 500?
AU finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 28 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +288%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did AU do in stock market crashes?
AU fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when AU fell 51.7% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies AU?
These had a low correlation with AU over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.34), DXJ (correlation 0.19) and EMLP (correlation 0.24); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.08), CLS (correlation -0.11) and FIX (correlation -0.02). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than AU's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of AU's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to AU
NEMNewmont
WPMWheaton Precious Metals
FNVFranco-Nevada
AEMAgnico Eagle Mines
BBarrick Mining
GLDSPDR Gold Shares