Relative Intelligence · Oil & Gas Midstream

How Targa Resources (TRGP) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on TRGP alone. It places TRGP (Targa Resources Corp.) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where TRGP stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: TRGP's full trading record, from December 2010 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, TRGP rose 27.6% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. TRGP has bounced back 41.6% from its October 2025 low after a 31.6% loss from January 2025 to October 2025 over the same months the S&P 500 rose 10.5%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?TRGP rose 4.1% over the past 3 months, 5.7 points ahead of the oil & gas midstream ETF AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF), which fell 1.6%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsTRGP has run far ahead of the market, rising 98.1% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (260% against 89.3%). On the flip side, TRGP led its oil & gas midstream peers in 2023, then fell behind them in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termTRGP turned $10,000 into $92,900 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. TRGP's 10-year return of 829% puts it ahead of 94% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross five sell-offs, TRGP has typically fallen 2.7 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, TRGP fell harder than most of its oil & gas midstream peers, including ENB (Enbridge), WMB and EPD. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, TRGP has a correlation of 0.42 over 5 years, more closely than 57% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, TRGP's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.85: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.6 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.6 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- MPC (Marathon Petroleum, oil & gas) earned more for the risk it took than TRGP over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 79.7%, against 90.8% for TRGP.
- Whole market
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TRGP with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How much would $10,000 in TRGP have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in TRGP over the past 15 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of TRGP over the same span and TRGP's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: TRGP began trading on December 7, 2010, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash. It covers the most recent 15 years of TRGP's record, starting at the end of September 2011.
- $10,000 invested in TRGP at the end of September 2011 would have grown to $172,828 by September 2026, more than the $87,526 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of TRGP, and FIX finished highest, at $2,265,778.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2011 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 166 of the 2,130 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of TRGP; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- FIX$2M+22,558% total · +43.6% a year
- LNG$549,053+5,391% total · +30.6% a year
- MPC$445,808+4,358% total · +28.8% a year
- VLO$399,578+3,896% total · +27.9% a year
- AAPL$291,870+2,819% total · +25.2% a year
- TRGP$172,828+1,628% total · +20.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$87,526+775% total · +15.6% a year
- EOG$55,422+454% total · +12.1% a year
- PBA$40,673+307% total · +9.8% a year
- OXY$12,449+24.5% total · +1.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 79 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of TRGP; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- FIX$236,701+2,267% total · +88.3% a year
- LPG$96,257+863% total · +57.3% a year
- HWM$73,554+636% total · +49.0% a year
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- VLO$64,131+541% total · +45.0% a year
- TRGP$61,030+510% total · +43.6% a year
- LNG$28,953+190% total · +23.7% a year
- EOG$21,734+117% total · +16.8% a year
- OXY$20,110+101% total · +15.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
TRGP at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: TRGP began trading on December 7, 2010, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash.
- TRGP's deepest decline since it began trading in 2010 was 95.2%, from June 2014 to March 2020. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 15 full calendar years, TRGP's best was 2016, when it returned 131%, and its worst was 2015, when it lost 73.4%. It lost money in four of those years.
- TRGP is 3.2% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $63B
- Industry
- Oil & Gas Midstream
- Price history from
- December 2010
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +98.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +260%+53.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +473%+41.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +829%+25.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +131%2016
- Worst calendar year
- −73.4%2015
- Losing years
- 4 of 15full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 31.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.27return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −95.2%Jun 2014 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −3.2%below the peak
TRGP against the whole market
Where TRGP ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does TRGP rank among all stocks?
This section ranks TRGP on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how TRGP stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), TRGP ranks in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
- TRGP's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the bottom 11% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | TRGP | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +98.1% | 186 of 3,287 | top 6% |
| 3-year return | +260% | 286 of 3,017 | top 9% |
| 5-year return | +473% | 70 of 2,893 | top 2% |
| 10-year return | +829% | 141 of 2,202 | top 6% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 31.7% | 885 of 2,893 | top 31% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.27 | 15 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −90.8% | 1,947 of 2,187 | bottom 12% |
What has beaten TRGP on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). TRGP sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than TRGP with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- None of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TRGP over the past 5 years with less volatility: nothing sits in the green region.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to TRGP. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than TRGP?
Investments that beat TRGP over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MPC (oil & gas) earned more for the risk it took than TRGP over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 79.7%, against 90.8% for TRGP.
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TRGP with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat TRGP over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks TRGP's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than TRGP's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× TRGP's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than TRGP's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with TRGP?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.42 | 0.09% | |||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 2 shownEverything else in Oil & Gas Midstream and Oil & Gas and the categories next to it (Exploration & Production, Integrated Oil & Gas, Oilfield Services), plus TRGP's specific themes. 2 of 68 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.46 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 26 of 3,548 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.30 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.26 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.40 | — | ||
LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | On the frontierHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | 0.10 | — | |
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.19 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.10 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for TRGP
- Annual return
- TRGP returned 41.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $57,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- TRGP's volatility over the past 5 years was 31.7%, 1.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TRGP's return lands within 31.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- TRGP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.27, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so TRGP earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- TRGP's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 90.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 90.8% fall takes a 983% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, TRGP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.42 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TRGP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TRGP holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
TRGP against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against TRGP, compared period by period and year by year.
How do TRGP's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at TRGP, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 17 popular alternatives earned more than TRGP over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, TRGP returned 41.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (31.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than TRGP with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| TRGP This pageTarga Resources Corp. | +41.8% | 31.7% |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | +24.6% | 24.0% |
| DTM DT Midstream, Inc. | +24.5% | 25.2% |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | +23.5% | 18.8% |
| WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | +23.5% | 27.6% |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | +23.4% | 30.2% |
| AM Antero Midstream Corporation | +20.1% | 25.9% |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | +18.7% | 22.5% |
| FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | +17.6% | 36.6% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | +16.6% | 32.3% |
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | +16.4% | 17.1% |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | +15.2% | 37.9% |
| PBA Pembina Pipeline Corporation | +13.8% | 21.5% |
| OKE ONEOK, Inc. | +13.3% | 28.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| HESM Hess Midstream LP | +10.9% | 27.0% |
| TRP TC Energy Corporation | +10.8% | 21.9% |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | +9.1% | 18.9% |
| DOW Dow Inc. | −7.6% | 34.1% |
Has TRGP consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares TRGP with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than TRGP helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 17 popular alternatives outperformed TRGP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was LNG.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than TRGP over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| TRGP Targa Resources Corp. (this page) | — | +1.1% | +4.1% | +27.6% | +59.0% | +98.1% | +260% | +473% | +829% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | — | $63B | — |
| LNG Oil & Gas MidstreamCheniere Energy, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +3.0% | +7.2% | +12.8% | +44.3% | +29.3% | +69.8% | +186% | +616% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | — | $59B | — |
| EOG Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionEOG Resources, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +12.4% | +12.7% | +24.0% | +51.9% | +53.1% | +31.9% | +115% | +131% | 32.3% | 0.64 | −77.1% | — | $83B | — |
| OXY Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOccidental Petroleum Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +9.9% | +14.5% | +16.6% | +50.6% | +56.4% | +2.0% | +103% | +11.6% | 37.9% | 0.56 | −88.4% | — | $63B | — |
| PBA Oil & Gas MidstreamPembina Pipeline Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +8.0% | −0.1% | +20.5% | +34.4% | +39.3% | +91.3% | +90.5% | +172% | 21.5% | 0.71 | −70.9% | — | $29B | — |
| KMI Oil & Gas MidstreamKinder Morgan, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.8% | +4.0% | +7.1% | +24.6% | +26.9% | +129% | +136% | +163% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | — | $75B | — |
| FANG Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionDiamondback Energy, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +6.9% | +4.2% | +11.6% | +35.1% | +46.8% | +35.7% | +125% | +160% | 36.6% | 0.63 | −88.7% | — | $57B | — |
| TRP Oil & Gas MidstreamTC Energy Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +3.3% | −8.8% | +3.6% | +13.8% | +24.9% | +136% | +66.7% | +160% | 21.9% | 0.58 | −41.6% | — | $64B | — |
| DOW ChemicalsDow Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +8.6% | +2.2% | −14.7% | +30.8% | +48.8% | −25.6% | −32.7% | — | 34.1% | -0.06 | −64.4% | — | $22B | — |
| MPLX Oil & Gas MidstreamMPLX Lp | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.2% | +4.1% | +8.8% | +14.7% | +27.2% | +105% | +187% | +350% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | — | $59B | — |
| WMB Oil & Gas MidstreamThe Williams Companies, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.8% | −4.5% | +0.6% | +18.1% | +14.9% | +125% | +200% | +288% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | — | $86B | — |
| OKE Oil & Gas MidstreamONEOK, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.1% | +0.4% | +13.5% | +29.6% | +42.8% | +59.9% | +86.8% | +233% | 28.0% | 0.59 | −80.2% | — | $59B | — |
| EPD Oil & Gas MidstreamEnterprise Products Partners L.P. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.9% | −3.2% | +3.2% | +20.3% | +28.4% | +65.2% | +113% | +178% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | — | $80B | — |
| WES Oil & Gas MidstreamWestern Midstream Partners, LP | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.4% | −2.6% | +14.1% | +19.4% | +27.6% | +110% | +187% | +128% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | — | $18B | — |
| ENB Oil & Gas MidstreamEnbridge Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −12.9% | −4.6% | +5.0% | +8.5% | +84.0% | +54.3% | +103% | 18.9% | 0.56 | −44.1% | — | $107B | — |
| AM Oil & Gas MidstreamAntero Midstream Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.2% | −8.0% | +0.5% | +18.4% | +17.2% | +95.0% | +149% | — | 25.9% | 0.84 | −92.9% | — | $9.8B | — |
| DTM Oil & Gas MidstreamDT Midstream, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.1% | −14.2% | −6.1% | +3.2% | +14.4% | +147% | +199% | — | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | $12B | — |
| HESM Oil & Gas MidstreamHess Midstream LP | 0/5 short0/3 long | −22.5% | −22.2% | −13.6% | −5.8% | +0.8% | +27.1% | +67.9% | — | 27.0% | 0.52 | −75.2% | — | $6.3B | — |
How did TRGP do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2011, along with where TRGP ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with TRGP and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: TRGP began trading on December 7, 2010, so the table starts with 2011, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, TRGP finished in the top quarter in eight of 15 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 18.
- TRGP finished ahead of the S&P 500 in eight of its 15 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, MPLX came out ahead of TRGP most often, in seven of the 13 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of TRGP; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places TRGP among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of TRGP | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRGP This pageTarga Resources Corp. | — | +5.7% | +110% | +21.0% | +43.7% | +100% | −32.5% | +24.0% | −19.9% | −7.1% | +131% | −73.4% | +23.2% | +72.0% | +34.2% | +56.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 8 of 15 | 10 of 18 | 1 of 18 | 3 of 18 | 4 of 18 | 2 of 17 | 13 of 17 | 7 of 16 | 11 of 16 | 12 of 14 | 2 of 14 | 14 of 14 | 5 of 14 | 3 of 14 | 2 of 11 | 3 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 15 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 8 of 15 | −8.7% | +27.2% | +15.0% | +49.3% | +69.5% | −1.7% | +3.2% | +9.9% | +29.9% | +11.2% | −47.1% | +63.3% | +130% | +116% | +57.5% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 4 of 15 | −11.4% | +4.3% | −2.0% | +56.9% | +88.6% | −38.6% | −2.8% | −18.7% | +7.5% | +44.0% | −22.5% | +10.3% | +39.7% | +23.4% | +8.5% |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 4 of 15 | −14.9% | −15.9% | −4.1% | +119% | +67.7% | −56.6% | −28.3% | −13.1% | +8.5% | +9.8% | −12.7% | −8.9% | +27.8% | −16.1% | −2.6% |
| PBA Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 6 of 15 | +8.6% | +13.1% | +7.8% | +17.8% | +36.8% | −31.0% | +31.1% | −14.0% | +20.4% | +51.6% | −37.1% | +8.0% | +29.6% | +4.0% | +43.0% |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 4 of 14 | +4.7% | +64.4% | +4.2% | +21.2% | +23.8% | −30.8% | +44.4% | −11.1% | −11.1% | +42.7% | −62.8% | +23.2% | +6.3% | +13.0% | — |
| FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 4 of 13 | −5.6% | +10.3% | +19.7% | +35.4% | +127% | −46.0% | +0.9% | −26.4% | +24.9% | +51.1% | +11.9% | +13.0% | +177% | — | — |
| TRP TC Energy Corporation | 5 of 15 | +24.0% | +39.9% | +6.1% | −8.8% | +21.7% | −18.7% | +57.0% | −22.2% | +12.9% | +46.1% | −29.0% | +12.3% | +1.0% | +13.2% | +20.0% |
| DOW Dow Inc. | 1 of 6 | −37.4% | −22.8% | +14.7% | −6.6% | +6.8% | +7.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | 7 of 13 | +20.6% | +41.7% | +22.5% | +21.1% | +54.0% | −1.8% | −8.2% | −8.4% | +8.9% | −6.3% | −44.8% | +69.0% | +46.9% | — | — |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 4 of 15 | +14.9% | +62.4% | +11.8% | +32.9% | +38.4% | −8.2% | +14.2% | −23.9% | +2.0% | +31.2% | −39.2% | +21.3% | +22.8% | +29.9% | +37.3% |
| OKE ONEOK, Inc. | 6 of 15 | −22.9% | +50.1% | +13.2% | +18.9% | +64.7% | −43.5% | +47.8% | +6.3% | −2.1% | +150% | −47.4% | −5.3% | +49.6% | +1.5% | +61.2% |
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 5 of 15 | +9.4% | +28.0% | +17.7% | +18.3% | +21.4% | −23.6% | +21.9% | −1.4% | +4.3% | +12.5% | −25.5% | +13.3% | +38.5% | +12.0% | +17.7% |
| WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 4 of 13 | +12.8% | +43.6% | +19.5% | +29.2% | +72.2% | −19.2% | −22.7% | −20.3% | −8.0% | +22.3% | −38.1% | +55.5% | +34.2% | — | — |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | 6 of 15 | +19.5% | +26.3% | −1.1% | +6.5% | +30.9% | −13.6% | +36.0% | −15.5% | −3.7% | +32.4% | −33.3% | +21.0% | +3.7% | +19.2% | +37.0% |
| AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 3 of 8 | +24.4% | +28.4% | +25.8% | +21.9% | +39.5% | +27.6% | −24.5% | −41.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DTM DT Midstream, Inc. | 1 of 4 | +24.1% | +89.0% | +4.7% | +20.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HESM Hess Midstream LP | 3 of 8 | +0.5% | +26.4% | +14.3% | +16.6% | +53.0% | −5.2% | +43.9% | −8.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How TRGP has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were TRGP's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents TRGP's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2010, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: TRGP began trading on December 7, 2010, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of TRGP's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: TRGP fell 95.2% from June 2014 to March 2020, while the S&P 500 rose 36.8%.
- The slowest recovery came after TRGP fell 95.2% from June 2014 to March 2020; it did not regain that peak until February 2024, four years later.
Green means TRGP fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | TRGP fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −95.2% | +36.8% | Jun 2014 | Mar 2020 | 5.8 years | Feb 2024 | 3.9 years |
| No named crash | −31.6% | +10.5% | Jan 2025 | Oct 2025 | 9 months | Feb 2026 | 4 months |
| 2011 euro debt crisis | −25.2% | −16.8% | Apr 2011 | Aug 2011 | 4 months | Dec 2011 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −17.6% | −5.9% | May 2012 | Jun 2012 | 1 month | Sep 2012 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −17.2% | −1.2% | Nov 2024 | Dec 2024 | 1 month | Jan 2025 | 1 month |
How did TRGP do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far TRGP, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: TRGP began trading on December 7, 2010, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- TRGP fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the seven crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when TRGP fell 79.1% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, KMI held up best, falling less than TRGP in all seven crashes they both traded through.
- TRGP began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but eight of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was ENB's 40.9%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than TRGP.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRGP This pageTarga Resources Corp. | — | −5.6% | −30.0% | −88.0% | −40.6% | −5.1% | −79.1% | −22.8% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 7 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 5 of 7 | −1.3% | −17.8% | −46.1% | −21.3% | −5.1% | −66.5% | −62.4% | 0.0% | −97.7% | −84.4% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −7.4% | −33.4% | −61.5% | −37.3% | −11.3% | −31.7% | −35.8% | −1.5% | −68.0% | −52.7% |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 5 of 7 | −4.6% | −22.9% | −76.8% | −30.5% | −7.3% | −21.4% | −36.1% | 0.0% | −58.1% | −28.4% |
| PBA Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 6 of 7 | −4.0% | −27.4% | −70.9% | −17.6% | −5.8% | −34.3% | −12.0% | — | — | — |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 7 of 7 | −3.2% | −20.3% | −55.1% | −19.8% | −4.0% | −64.4% | −16.2% | — | — | — |
| FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −7.7% | −33.5% | −80.3% | −38.7% | −9.8% | −29.3% | — | — | — | — |
| TRP TC Energy Corporation | 5 of 7 | −4.0% | −30.7% | −41.6% | −15.3% | −5.2% | −18.5% | −12.8% | −0.6% | −45.4% | −13.7% |
| DOW Dow Inc. | 1 of 3 | −6.9% | −37.1% | −54.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | 6 of 6 | −1.2% | −18.4% | −64.6% | −17.9% | −4.5% | −66.8% | — | — | — | — |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 4 of 7 | −3.4% | −23.0% | −57.0% | −25.4% | −7.0% | −78.9% | −26.7% | −3.4% | −75.3% | −98.0% |
| OKE ONEOK, Inc. | 5 of 7 | −5.1% | −29.2% | −80.2% | −25.5% | −5.9% | −51.3% | −21.0% | −0.8% | −63.1% | −42.0% |
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 7 of 7 | −2.4% | −18.0% | −53.2% | −18.6% | −4.1% | −31.3% | −13.0% | 0.0% | −44.4% | −34.6% |
| WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 5 of 6 | −2.5% | −23.5% | −77.4% | −17.6% | −6.5% | −63.0% | — | — | — | — |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | 7 of 7 | −1.5% | −23.9% | −43.4% | −13.8% | −3.2% | −34.6% | −13.2% | 0.0% | −40.9% | −21.0% |
| AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 3 of 5 | −2.7% | −21.9% | −60.8% | −43.1% | −7.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| DTM DT Midstream, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −3.7% | −19.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HESM Hess Midstream LP | 4 of 5 | −3.9% | −28.7% | −70.8% | −28.9% | −8.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does TRGP move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares TRGP with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Only LNG, MPLX and WMB had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than TRGP's 0.99, out of 13 popular alternatives with the same record.
- Over the past 10 years, TRGP captured 156% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 157% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.85. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than TRGP's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRGP This pageTarga Resources Corp. | 156% | 157% | 0.99 | 1.85 |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 79% | 30% | 2.65 | 0.77 |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | 87% | 76% | 1.14 | 1.16 |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 85% | 78% | 1.08 | 1.02 |
| TRP TC Energy Corporation | 67% | 73% | 0.92 | 0.72 |
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 81% | 94% | 0.86 | 0.93 |
| PBA Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 79% | 92% | 0.85 | 1.02 |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 68% | 82% | 0.83 | 0.82 |
| OKE ONEOK, Inc. | 103% | 126% | 0.82 | 1.38 |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | 60% | 74% | 0.82 | 0.73 |
| FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 108% | 148% | 0.73 | 1.54 |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 92% | 135% | 0.69 | 1.17 |
| WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 121% | 175% | 0.69 | 2.23 |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 80% | 155% | 0.51 | 1.24 |
What diversifies TRGP?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with TRGP's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing TRGP with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in TRGP into SMH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 14% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+43.6% for TRGP alone, +44.2% for the mix).
- FIX made money in four of the four calendar years in which TRGP lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and DBEF have moved largely independently of TRGP over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.39 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which TRGP lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% TRGP and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 2018 | 2017 | 2015 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRGP Targa Resources Corp. (this page) | 1.00 | +473% | 1.27 | −32.5% | −19.9% | −7.1% | −73.4% | 29.6% | +43.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.29 | +225% | 1.34 | +3.9% | −19.8% | +22.8% | +7.7% | 24.6% | +41.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.13 | +323% | 0.97 | +55.5% | −9.1% | +38.5% | −0.3% | 25.5% | +44.2% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.39 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +2.1% | −9.5% | +16.7% | +4.1% | 24.6% | +37.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.16 | +126% | 0.96 | +24.8% | −1.9% | +12.8% | −10.7% | 24.5% | +39.2% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.34 | +136% | 0.93 | +28.2% | −0.9% | +27.8% | — | 25.4% | +39.8% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.47 | +99.4% | 0.93 | — | — | — | — | 25.3% | +38.2% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.42 | +109% | 0.90 | −0.2% | −11.1% | +21.9% | −4.1% | 25.7% | +38.8% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.17 | +153% | 0.89 | +31.5% | −9.9% | +26.9% | −12.9% | 25.1% | +40.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 2018 | 2017 | 2015 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRGP Targa Resources Corp. (this page) | 1.00 | +473% | 1.27 | −32.5% | −19.9% | −7.1% | −73.4% | 29.6% | +43.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.30 | +479% | 1.55 | +10.1% | −24.5% | −12.7% | +12.6% | 25.8% | +43.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.15 | +3,143% | 1.47 | −2.4% | −16.3% | −11.6% | −6.0% | 27.9% | +59.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.26 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +6.7% | +0.8% | +32.1% | +67.7% | 27.5% | +54.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.37 | +413% | 1.44 | +27.1% | −28.4% | +12.0% | −4.5% | 26.0% | +42.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.40 | +690% | 1.41 | −27.4% | −8.2% | +34.8% | +17.4% | 27.0% | +45.7% |
Common questions
What was TRGP's worst drawdown?
TRGP's deepest decline since it began trading in 2010 was 95.2%, from June 2014 to March 2020. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because TRGP launched in December 2010, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash.
What were TRGP's best and worst years?
Over 15 full calendar years, TRGP's best year was 2016, when it returned 131%. Its worst was 2015, with a return of -73.4%.
Is there a better investment than TRGP?
Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MPC (oil & gas) earned more for the risk it took than TRGP over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 79.7%, against 90.8% for TRGP. Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TRGP with less volatility over the past 5 years.
Is TRGP more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. TRGP's volatility over the past 5 years was 31.7%, 1.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TRGP's return lands within 31.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is TRGP's Sharpe ratio?
TRGP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.27, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so TRGP earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is TRGP with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, TRGP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.42 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TRGP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TRGP holding.
What are the best alternatives to TRGP?
None of the 17 popular alternatives we compared outperformed TRGP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about TRGP's strength than about its alternatives.
Did TRGP outperform the S&P 500?
TRGP finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in eight of 15 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +5.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did TRGP do in stock market crashes?
TRGP fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the seven major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when TRGP fell 79.1% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies TRGP?
These had a low correlation with TRGP over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.29), SMH (correlation 0.13) and DBEF (correlation 0.39); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.30), CLS (correlation 0.15) and FIX (correlation 0.26). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than TRGP's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of TRGP's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to TRGP
LNGCheniere Energy
EOGEOG Resources
OXYOccidental Petroleum
KMIKinder Morgan
FANGDiamondback Energy
TRPTC Energy
MPLXMPLX
WMBWilliams Companies
OKEONEOK
EPDEnterprise Products Partners
ENBEnbridge