Relative Intelligence · Technology Equity

How State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on XLK alone. It places XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where XLK stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: XLK's full trading record, from December 1998 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- What you're buying100% of XLK sits in technology, against 38% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, XLK rose 20.3% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. After a 25.7% loss from February 2025 to April 2025, XLK has bounced 23.5% off the low. At a glance ↓
- Fund or market?XLK rose 5.7% over the past 3 months, in line with the S&P 500, which rose 3.9%: a market move, not its own. Its similar funds did not move as one over the past 3 months: IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0%, while SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) fell 4.5%.
- Long termXLK turned $10,000 into $86,700 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. XLK's 10-year return of 767% puts it ahead of 99% of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, XLK has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500. The 2022 bear market took 32.4% off XLK, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than PSCT (Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF, 29.6%) but less than VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF, 33.6%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationXLK is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.87 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.86 with the total US market, more closely than 77% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. Market capture ↓
- Better optionsFew investments have done better on both counts: only 19 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than XLK with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT (Walmart), ABBV (AbbVie) and PM (Philip Morris International). Across the whole market, XLK outpaced 99% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets over the past decade. Better options ↓
How much would $10,000 in XLK have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in XLK over the past 25 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of XLK over the same span and XLK's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 25 years rather than XLK's full 27 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in XLK at the end of September 2001 would have grown to $273,782 by September 2026, more than the $114,557 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of XLK, and SMH finished highest, at $660,531.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2001 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 253 of the 1,326 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of XLK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SMH$660,531+6,505% total · +18.2% a year
- SOXX$435,742+4,257% total · +16.3% a year
- IYW$313,871+3,039% total · +14.8% a year
- QQQ$303,059+2,931% total · +14.6% a year
- XNTK$301,893+2,919% total · +14.6% a year
- IGM$301,323+2,913% total · +14.6% a year
- XLK$273,782+2,638% total · +14.2% a year
- IGV$184,528+1,745% total · +12.4% a year
- XLY$126,854+1,169% total · +10.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$114,557+1,046% total · +10.2% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 418 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of XLK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- SMH$48,982+390% total · +37.4% a year
- SOXX$39,747+297% total · +31.8% a year
- DXJ$32,976+230% total · +27.0% a year
- MPLX$30,642+206% total · +25.1% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- FLTW$28,422+184% total · +23.2% a year
- XLK$27,207+172% total · +22.2% a year
- XSD$27,144+171% total · +22.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
XLK at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- XLK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1998 was 82.0%, from March 2000 to October 2002. It took about 14 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 27 full calendar years, XLK's best was 1999, when it returned 65.0%, and its worst was 2000, when it lost 41.9%. It lost money in seven of those years.
- XLK is 8.2% below its all-time high.
The fund
- Issuer
- SPDR
- Began trading
- December 1998
- Expense ratio
- 0.08%per year
- Assets
- $125B
- Category
- Technology
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +29.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +131%+32.1% a year
- Past 5 years
- +143%+19.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +767%+24.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +65.0%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −41.9%2000
- Losing years
- 7 of 27full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 26.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.82return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −82.0%Mar 2000 to Oct 2002
- From its all-time high
- −8.2%below the peak
XLK against the whole market
Where XLK ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does XLK rank among all ETFs?
This section ranks XLK on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how XLK stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- XLK's 10-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 958 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 10 years of history.
- XLK is among the more volatile ETFs: its price swings rank in the bottom 11% of the 1,560 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed ETFs with at least $100M in assets that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller ETFs and leveraged funds are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | XLK | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +29.3% | 176 of 2,485 | top 7% |
| 3-year return | +131% | 106 of 1,949 | top 5% |
| 5-year return | +143% | 47 of 1,560 | top 3% |
| 10-year return | +767% | 9 of 958 | top 1% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 26.0% | 1,391 of 1,560 | bottom 12% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.82 | 322 of 1,560 | top 21% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −33.6% | 273 of 951 | top 29% |
What has beaten XLK on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). XLK sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than XLK with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 12 stocks and seven ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than XLK over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half XLK's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 27% less than XLK's 26.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.82 for XLK.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to XLK; faint dots are 12 more of the 19 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than XLK?
Investments that beat XLK over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 19 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than XLK with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, ABBV and PM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat XLK over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio. It checks XLK's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than XLK follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than XLK's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× XLK's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than XLK's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with XLK?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +19.4% | 26.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | +767% | 1.00 | 0.08% | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.87 | 0.09% | |||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 84 of 3,484 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.00 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.20 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.02 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.16 | — | ||
FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.77 | 0.19% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.19 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.42 | 0.48% | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.12 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for XLK
- Annual return
- XLK returned 19.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $24,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- XLK's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.0%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, XLK's return lands within 26.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- XLK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.82, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so XLK earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- XLK's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 33.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 33.6% fall takes a 50.5% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, XLK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.87 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against XLK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a XLK holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 19 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than XLK with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 18 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with XLK | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.00 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.20 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.02 | — | |
| 4 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.77 | 0.19% |
| 5 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.19 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.02 | — | |
| 7 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.42 | 0.48% |
| 8 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.25 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.44 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.19 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.08 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.38 | — | |
| 13 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | -0.06 | 0.80% |
| 14 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.25 | — |
| 15 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.12 | — |
| 16 | IXCiShares Global Energy ETF · International | Whole market | +20.7% | 23.2% | 0.93 | −64.2% | +183% | -0.02 | 0.37% |
| 17 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.60 | 0.45% |
| 18 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.19 | 0.95% |
See everything that outperformed XLK →
XLK against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against XLK, compared period by period and year by year.
How do XLK's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at XLK, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than XLK over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 13 of the 20 popular alternatives earned less than XLK over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, XLK returned 19.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (26.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than XLK with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | +33.4% | 36.9% |
| SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | +27.5% | 38.9% |
| XLK This pageState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | +19.4% | 26.0% |
| IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | +19.2% | 26.2% |
| IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | +19.0% | 26.6% |
| VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | +18.4% | 26.0% |
| XSD State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | +18.3% | 40.8% |
| IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | +18.1% | 26.5% |
| RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | +16.9% | 25.1% |
| XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | +16.9% | 29.3% |
| TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | +16.2% | 21.3% |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | +14.5% | 23.0% |
| CIBR First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF | +14.1% | 26.1% |
| PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | +13.6% | 39.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | +11.0% | 26.2% |
| PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | +10.5% | 29.0% |
| SKYY First Trust Cloud Computing ETF | +7.5% | 31.4% |
| XLC State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF | +7.2% | 21.1% |
| XLY State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF | +4.8% | 24.1% |
| IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | +4.4% | 28.9% |
| XSW State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | +2.7% | 29.6% |
Has XLK consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares XLK with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than XLK helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 22 popular alternatives outperformed XLK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was SMH.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than XLK over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (this page) | — | −4.8% | +5.7% | +20.3% | +29.0% | +29.3% | +131% | +143% | +767% | 26.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | 0.08% | $125B | — |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 2/5 short3/3 long | −8.3% | −2.2% | +17.8% | +46.4% | +57.8% | +290% | +323% | +1,665% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | 0.35% | $66B | 100% |
| SOXX Broad MarketiShares Semiconductor ETF | 2/5 short3/3 long | −10.6% | −4.5% | +19.9% | +59.7% | +71.2% | +234% | +237% | +1,392% | 38.9% | 0.82 | −45.8% | 0.33% | $39B | — |
| XSD TechnologyState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 2/5 short2/3 long | −10.0% | −5.8% | +11.5% | +40.9% | +35.0% | +166% | +132% | +857% | 40.8% | 0.62 | −42.3% | 0.35% | $2.7B | 97% |
| IYW Broad MarketiShares U.S. Technology ETF | 1/5 short2/3 long | −4.2% | +5.6% | +20.4% | +26.8% | +27.0% | +143% | +138% | +805% | 26.6% | 0.79 | −39.4% | 0.37% | $24B | — |
| RSPT TechnologyInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 5/5 short1/3 long | −2.8% | +8.4% | +24.4% | +41.0% | +42.9% | +141% | +119% | +572% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | 0.40% | $6.1B | 99% |
| PTF TechnologyInvesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 3/5 short1/3 long | −3.9% | +2.6% | −4.2% | +30.5% | +30.6% | +147% | +89.4% | +675% | 39.0% | 0.52 | −44.9% | 0.69% | $589M | 94% |
| VGT TechnologyVanguard Information Technology ETF | 2/5 short1/3 long | −4.2% | +6.3% | +19.1% | +27.6% | +26.7% | +138% | +133% | +779% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | 0.09% | $178B | 99% |
| FTEC TechnologyFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 2/5 short1/3 long | −4.2% | +6.3% | +19.1% | +27.6% | +27.0% | +139% | +135% | +763% | 26.1% | 0.79 | −34.9% | 0.08% | $22B | 99% |
| IXN InternationaliShares Global Tech ETF | 2/5 short1/3 long | −6.2% | +4.4% | +19.3% | +31.2% | +32.0% | +145% | +141% | +720% | 26.2% | 0.81 | −36.3% | 0.37% | $9.1B | — |
| XNTK TechnologyState Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −6.7% | +3.7% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +26.2% | +168% | +119% | +728% | 29.3% | 0.68 | −48.3% | 0.35% | $2.0B | 86% |
| IGM Broad MarketiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −5.1% | +4.5% | +16.2% | +24.4% | +24.3% | +156% | +130% | +720% | 26.5% | 0.76 | −40.7% | 0.37% | $11B | — |
| CIBR TechnologyFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF | 5/5 short0/3 long | −2.6% | +9.4% | +49.9% | +42.4% | +31.9% | +127% | +93.2% | +454% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | 0.58% | $17B | 95% |
| SKYY TechnologyFirst Trust Cloud Computing ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −2.9% | +19.5% | +37.0% | +27.8% | +21.5% | +122% | +43.4% | +396% | 31.4% | 0.39 | −53.2% | 0.60% | $3.3B | 88% |
| IGV Broad MarketiShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −0.2% | +15.0% | +23.9% | +4.2% | −6.1% | +57.9% | +24.0% | +383% | 28.9% | 0.29 | −45.9% | 0.38% | $15B | — |
| XSW TechnologyState Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | +2.5% | +15.8% | +32.7% | +12.5% | +3.9% | +71.5% | +14.1% | +293% | 29.6% | 0.24 | −45.4% | 0.35% | $488M | 91% |
| PSCT TechnologyInvesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −3.0% | −1.8% | +8.4% | +34.4% | +37.7% | +92.2% | +64.9% | +284% | 29.0% | 0.49 | −40.4% | 0.29% | $508M | 90% |
| FXL TechnologyFirst Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 2/5 short0/3 long | −1.5% | +10.4% | +18.9% | +28.7% | +28.3% | +103% | +68.2% | +523% | 26.2% | 0.53 | −38.5% | 0.60% | $2.7B | 90% |
| QQQ Broad MarketInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.2% | +3.2% | +11.2% | +17.4% | +17.9% | +106% | +97.2% | +553% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | 0.18% | $492B | 59% |
| TDIV TechnologyFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.7% | +5.3% | +8.6% | +17.7% | +15.2% | +117% | +111% | +388% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | 0.50% | $4.4B | 84% |
| XLY Consumer DiscretionaryState Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.9% | +1.0% | −3.2% | −1.8% | −1.4% | +56.1% | +26.4% | +224% | 24.1% | 0.32 | −39.7% | 0.08% | $22B | 1% |
| XLC CommunicationState Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1/5 short0/3 long | −4.0% | −0.2% | −6.7% | −4.9% | −4.0% | +71.5% | +41.9% | — | 21.1% | 0.44 | −46.7% | 0.08% | $24B | 0% |
| JTEK TechnologyJPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −5.3% | +1.5% | +7.2% | +9.6% | +6.6% | +104% | — | — | — | — | −30.6% | 0.65% | $4.4B | 76% |
How did XLK do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1999, along with where XLK ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with XLK and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, XLK finished in the top quarter in eight of 25 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 9 of 22.
- XLK finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 15 of its 27 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, SMH came out ahead of XLK most often, in 16 of the 25 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of XLK; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places XLK among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of XLK | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK This pageState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | — | +24.6% | +21.6% | +56.0% | −27.7% | +34.8% | +43.6% | +49.9% | −1.7% | +34.3% | +15.0% | +5.5% | +17.9% | +26.2% | +15.4% | +2.5% | +11.5% | +51.1% | −41.5% | +15.5% | +12.2% | −0.4% | +5.6% | +38.7% | −38.2% | −23.4% | −41.9% | +65.0% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 8 of 25 | 9 of 22 | 16 of 22 | 7 of 21 | 5 of 21 | 5 of 21 | 16 of 21 | 4 of 21 | 13 of 20 | 10 of 20 | 9 of 20 | 9 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 18 of 19 | 7 of 18 | 4 of 16 | 13 of 15 | 12 of 15 | 4 of 15 | 4 of 14 | 2 of 11 | 9 of 11 | 5 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 3 of 6 | — | — |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 27 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 16 of 25 | +49.2% | +39.1% | +73.4% | −33.5% | +42.1% | +55.5% | +64.5% | −9.1% | +38.5% | +35.6% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +33.4% | +8.6% | +6.8% | +19.0% | +60.5% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −6.7% | +10.8% | −19.3% | +87.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | — |
| SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 13 of 24 | +40.7% | +12.9% | +67.1% | −35.1% | +44.1% | +52.7% | +62.4% | −6.5% | +39.8% | +38.3% | −2.0% | +29.8% | +41.6% | +6.6% | −10.6% | +14.3% | +74.8% | −51.7% | −2.2% | +0.2% | +13.4% | −14.3% | +81.0% | −47.9% | — | — | — |
| XSD State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 10 of 19 | +29.8% | +10.8% | +34.9% | −30.9% | +42.5% | +62.0% | +64.7% | −6.3% | +25.2% | +29.4% | +10.2% | +31.1% | +36.4% | +2.4% | −18.1% | +15.7% | +99.0% | −47.7% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 11 of 25 | +25.4% | +30.3% | +65.5% | −34.8% | +35.4% | +47.5% | +46.6% | −1.0% | +36.6% | +13.7% | +3.7% | +19.5% | +26.6% | +11.6% | −0.1% | +12.5% | +63.8% | −43.1% | +15.1% | +9.7% | +2.6% | −0.1% | +49.3% | −38.9% | −28.7% | — | — |
| RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 7 of 19 | +22.2% | +15.2% | +35.2% | −24.4% | +28.5% | +30.2% | +42.1% | −0.7% | +32.8% | +19.3% | +2.8% | +19.3% | +40.9% | +11.6% | −6.6% | +17.5% | +69.1% | −45.8% | +0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 4 of 19 | +5.7% | +43.6% | +33.7% | −31.7% | +18.1% | +82.0% | +46.7% | 0.0% | +32.1% | +0.8% | +3.5% | +8.8% | +35.9% | +13.2% | −9.1% | +11.0% | +43.8% | −41.1% | +5.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 8 of 21 | +21.8% | +29.3% | +52.7% | −29.7% | +30.5% | +46.0% | +48.6% | +2.4% | +37.1% | +13.7% | +5.0% | +18.1% | +30.9% | +14.0% | +0.6% | +12.8% | +61.6% | −42.8% | +14.7% | +9.1% | +3.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 4 of 24 | +25.3% | +24.8% | +53.0% | −29.9% | +29.6% | +43.6% | +47.9% | −5.4% | +41.2% | +13.9% | +4.0% | +15.3% | +25.1% | +15.8% | −3.3% | +10.3% | +52.2% | −42.9% | +12.5% | +9.9% | +3.3% | +3.0% | +47.3% | −38.3% | — | — | — |
| XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 13 of 25 | +38.1% | +23.5% | +70.1% | −41.1% | +17.6% | +73.9% | +38.1% | −7.1% | +40.4% | +12.9% | +7.2% | +14.7% | +32.6% | +17.6% | −10.5% | +15.3% | +70.5% | −44.9% | +9.6% | +9.2% | +2.8% | +6.6% | +65.9% | −44.0% | −24.0% | — | — |
| IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 12 of 24 | +26.8% | +37.0% | +60.8% | −35.8% | +25.7% | +45.1% | +41.9% | +2.3% | +37.1% | +13.0% | +9.5% | +14.8% | +34.1% | +14.5% | −1.1% | +11.9% | +62.5% | −43.4% | +16.1% | +8.8% | +1.4% | +2.6% | +52.5% | −40.7% | — | — | — |
| CIBR First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF | 3 of 10 | +13.1% | +18.2% | +39.7% | −26.5% | +19.7% | +50.5% | +28.6% | +1.5% | +18.6% | +10.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SKYY First Trust Cloud Computing ETF | 5 of 14 | +9.2% | +35.9% | +52.2% | −44.7% | +10.6% | +57.8% | +25.3% | +6.6% | +33.5% | +15.2% | +6.0% | +7.4% | +33.6% | +15.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 12 of 24 | +5.6% | +23.4% | +58.6% | −35.7% | +12.3% | +52.9% | +34.3% | +12.5% | +42.1% | +5.8% | +12.2% | +13.4% | +30.6% | +16.9% | −7.3% | +24.6% | +47.6% | −38.5% | +15.7% | +10.8% | −5.5% | +13.8% | +50.3% | −44.8% | — | — | — |
| XSW State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 5 of 14 | −0.9% | +25.8% | +38.5% | −34.2% | +7.5% | +52.4% | +36.5% | +7.7% | +28.0% | +8.5% | +7.1% | +5.8% | +48.2% | +15.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 3 of 15 | +18.6% | −1.1% | +20.8% | −22.5% | +26.2% | +27.8% | +39.3% | −9.3% | +9.9% | +33.6% | +4.3% | +12.9% | +45.3% | +10.7% | −4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 6 of 18 | +13.3% | +16.0% | +40.5% | −30.4% | +18.2% | +54.2% | +38.7% | +2.7% | +35.8% | +15.4% | −3.3% | +16.4% | +38.2% | +8.5% | −11.7% | +26.7% | +66.8% | −48.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 15 of 26 | +20.8% | +25.6% | +54.9% | −32.6% | +27.4% | +48.6% | +39.0% | −0.1% | +32.7% | +7.1% | +9.4% | +19.2% | +36.6% | +18.1% | +3.4% | +19.9% | +54.7% | −41.7% | +19.0% | +7.2% | +1.6% | +10.5% | +49.7% | −37.4% | −33.4% | −36.1% | — |
| TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 4 of 13 | +25.3% | +24.4% | +36.7% | −22.1% | +29.5% | +17.5% | +33.3% | −3.2% | +22.0% | +20.1% | −6.4% | +15.6% | +30.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XLY State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF | 13 of 27 | +7.4% | +26.5% | +39.6% | −36.3% | +27.9% | +29.6% | +28.4% | +1.6% | +22.8% | +5.9% | +9.9% | +9.5% | +42.8% | +23.6% | +6.0% | +27.4% | +40.6% | −32.9% | −13.7% | +18.5% | −6.5% | +13.0% | +37.1% | −18.5% | +12.8% | −16.8% | +19.4% |
| XLC State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1 of 7 | +23.1% | +34.7% | +52.8% | −37.6% | +16.0% | +26.9% | +31.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JTEK JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF | 1 of 2 | +19.0% | +28.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How XLK has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were XLK's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents XLK's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1998, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In four of XLK's five worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after XLK fell 82.0% from March 2000 to October 2002; it did not regain that peak until March 2017, 14 years later.
Green means XLK fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | XLK fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −82.0% | −46.9% | Mar 2000 | Oct 2002 | 2.6 years | Mar 2017 | 14.4 years |
| 2022 bear market | −33.6% | −24.4% | Dec 2021 | Oct 2022 | 10 months | Jun 2023 | 8 months |
| Covid crash | −31.1% | −33.7% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jun 2020 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −25.7% | −18.8% | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 | 2 months | Jun 2025 | 2 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −23.8% | −19.2% | Oct 2018 | Dec 2018 | 2 months | Apr 2019 | 4 months |
How did XLK do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far XLK, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than XLK in most of the crashes they both traded through.
- XLK fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when XLK fell 82.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than XLK.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK This pageState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | — | −3.2% | −32.4% | −31.1% | −23.8% | −6.7% | −12.7% | −15.9% | −2.1% | −53.0% | −82.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 1 of 9 | −3.6% | −44.1% | −33.6% | −23.5% | −7.4% | −17.9% | −18.6% | −1.5% | −59.2% | — |
| SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 2 of 9 | −3.9% | −44.6% | −34.3% | −22.8% | −7.4% | −18.9% | −19.8% | −1.2% | −65.7% | — |
| XSD State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 2 of 9 | −4.8% | −40.6% | −35.9% | −22.2% | −8.1% | −18.6% | −27.5% | −1.1% | −63.5% | — |
| IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 1 of 9 | −3.7% | −36.7% | −30.5% | −23.7% | −6.7% | −16.0% | −17.8% | −2.3% | −54.8% | — |
| RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 2 of 9 | −4.6% | −31.6% | −33.7% | −22.1% | −6.8% | −16.9% | −20.5% | −2.3% | −58.2% | — |
| PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 1 of 9 | −4.9% | −37.0% | −34.6% | −26.8% | −5.8% | −26.1% | −24.4% | −2.7% | −54.5% | — |
| VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0 of 9 | −3.5% | −33.6% | −31.8% | −23.7% | −6.6% | −16.4% | −18.1% | −2.1% | −54.6% | — |
| IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 1 of 9 | −3.1% | −35.1% | −30.9% | −23.2% | −6.7% | −14.8% | −17.6% | −1.9% | −55.8% | — |
| XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0 of 9 | −4.2% | −44.4% | −32.3% | −25.3% | −6.6% | −21.5% | −19.3% | −2.0% | −58.0% | — |
| IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 1 of 9 | −3.8% | −37.7% | −30.2% | −23.9% | −6.6% | −17.3% | −18.2% | −2.6% | −54.9% | — |
| CIBR First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF | 3 of 6 | −4.6% | −31.0% | −33.1% | −22.9% | −5.3% | −29.7% | — | — | — | — |
| SKYY First Trust Cloud Computing ETF | 1 of 7 | −6.9% | −42.6% | −33.0% | −20.0% | −6.7% | −20.9% | −23.2% | — | — | — |
| IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 3 of 9 | −4.9% | −36.3% | −30.3% | −22.2% | −6.2% | −21.5% | −22.4% | −2.5% | −49.8% | — |
| XSW State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 1 of 6 | −6.9% | −35.8% | −37.8% | −23.3% | −4.0% | −24.0% | — | — | — | — |
| PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 2 of 8 | −5.3% | −29.6% | −37.5% | −25.2% | −5.1% | −14.8% | −28.0% | −6.1% | — | — |
| FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 0 of 9 | −5.3% | −34.2% | −34.0% | −24.3% | −6.7% | −20.7% | −24.6% | −2.4% | −61.4% | — |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 2 of 10 | −3.1% | −33.4% | −28.6% | −22.7% | −6.8% | −16.1% | −16.1% | −2.5% | −53.4% | −83.0% |
| TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 3 of 6 | −2.4% | −32.0% | −30.6% | −18.5% | −6.3% | −14.7% | — | — | — | — |
| XLY State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3 of 10 | −3.4% | −35.5% | −33.9% | −21.3% | −5.1% | −15.8% | −17.4% | −1.8% | −56.6% | −31.5% |
| XLC State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2 of 4 | −3.6% | −38.5% | −30.1% | −20.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does XLK move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares XLK with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, XLK captured 128% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 100% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.19. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only SMH and SOXX had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than XLK's 1.28, out of 19 popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than XLK's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK This pageState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 128% | 100% | 1.28 | 1.19 |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 159% | 108% | 1.47 | 1.46 |
| SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 156% | 112% | 1.39 | 1.50 |
| IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 131% | 104% | 1.26 | 1.21 |
| VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 130% | 104% | 1.25 | 1.22 |
| IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 127% | 102% | 1.25 | 1.20 |
| CIBR First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF | 99% | 79% | 1.25 | 0.97 |
| XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 131% | 108% | 1.22 | 1.30 |
| PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 125% | 103% | 1.21 | 1.38 |
| IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 131% | 110% | 1.19 | 1.24 |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 118% | 102% | 1.16 | 1.13 |
| XSD State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 151% | 133% | 1.13 | 1.65 |
| RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 125% | 114% | 1.10 | 1.24 |
| FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 120% | 111% | 1.08 | 1.22 |
| TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 109% | 108% | 1.01 | 1.07 |
| SKYY First Trust Cloud Computing ETF | 114% | 114% | 1.00 | 1.13 |
| IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 112% | 114% | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 108% | 119% | 0.91 | 1.27 |
| XSW State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 110% | 129% | 0.86 | 1.18 |
| XLY State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF | 102% | 125% | 0.82 | 1.18 |
What diversifies XLK?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with XLK's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing XLK with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in XLK into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+22.2% for XLK alone, +22.2% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of XLK over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.42 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in four of the seven calendar years in which XLK lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which XLK lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% XLK and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +143% | 0.82 | −27.7% | −1.7% | −41.5% | −0.4% | −38.2% | −23.4% | −41.9% | 24.0% | +22.2% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.22 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 19.7% | +21.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.42 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 20.4% | +23.5% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.28 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.2% | +21.3% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.33 | +140% | 0.97 | −5.2% | −15.3% | −36.8% | +4.6% | −13.6% | −9.2% | −11.8% | 20.8% | +22.5% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.03 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | — | — | 19.6% | +22.2% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.00 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −39.0% | +40.1% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | 19.9% | +23.5% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.19 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.2% | +22.1% |
| EFV InternationaliShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 0.36 | +89.0% | 0.88 | −5.2% | −14.7% | −41.7% | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | +21.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +143% | 0.82 | −27.7% | −1.7% | −41.5% | −0.4% | −38.2% | −23.4% | −41.9% | 24.0% | +22.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.16 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | −39.6% | +18.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 20.8% | +26.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.03 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −40.4% | +64.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 19.7% | +25.7% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.09 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.8% | +28.4% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.33 | +594% | 1.36 | +24.2% | −37.5% | −67.4% | −1.8% | −33.1% | +9.8% | −15.9% | 22.5% | +28.3% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.21 | +1,008% | 1.34 | +87.5% | −9.8% | −70.0% | +68.2% | −60.8% | +10.3% | −26.5% | 23.2% | +31.6% |
Common questions
What was XLK's worst drawdown?
XLK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1998 was 82.0%, from March 2000 to October 2002. It took about 14 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were XLK's best and worst years?
Over 27 full calendar years, XLK's best year was 1999, when it returned 65.0%. Its worst was 2000, with a return of -41.9%.
Is there a better investment than XLK?
Few investments have done better on both counts: only 19 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than XLK with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, ABBV and PM.
Is XLK more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. XLK's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.0%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, XLK's return lands within 26.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is XLK's Sharpe ratio?
XLK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.82, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so XLK earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is XLK with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, XLK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.87 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against XLK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a XLK holding.
What are the best alternatives to XLK?
None of the 22 popular alternatives we compared outperformed XLK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about XLK's strength than about its alternatives.
Did XLK outperform the S&P 500?
XLK finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 15 of 27 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +24.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did XLK do in stock market crashes?
XLK fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when XLK fell 82.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies XLK?
These had a low correlation with XLK over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.22), DXJ (correlation 0.42) and EMLP (correlation 0.28); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.16), MCK (correlation -0.03) and MPC (correlation 0.09). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than XLK's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of XLK's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to XLK
SMHVanEck Semiconductor ETF
SOXXiShares Semiconductor ETF
VGTVanguard Information Technology ETF
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1