Relative Intelligence · Semiconductors

How Texas Instruments (TXN) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on TXN alone. It places TXN (Texas Instruments Incorporated) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where TXN stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: TXN's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowTXN has outpaced the market, rising 20.1% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its semiconductor peers split over the past 6 months: MXL (MaxLinear) rose 132%, while AVGO (Broadcom) fell 16.0%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?TXN fell 1.7% over the past 3 months, in line with the semiconductors ETF SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF), which fell 2.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its semiconductor peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SWKS (Skyworks Solutions) rose 36.0%, while AVGO (Broadcom) fell 11.4%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, TXN rose 58.7% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (105% against 89.3%). Even so, TXN finished behind the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termTXN turned $10,000 into $52,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. That said, over 5 years TXN trailed the index: 60.5% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, TXN has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500. Even so, in the 2022 bear market, TXN held up better than its semiconductor peers, including AVGO (Broadcom), MPWR and NXPI. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationTXN is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.61 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.61 with the total US market, more closely than 92% of stocks worth at least $300 million. When the S&P 500 had a down month, TXN usually fell with it (18 of 22 months). By year ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- ADI (Analog Devices) and APH (Amphenol) earned more than TXN over the past 5 years with similar volatility: ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 33.7%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- AAPL (Apple, computer hardware) and MSFT (Microsoft, software) earned more than TXN with less volatility over the past 5 years. AAPL returned 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 33.7%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 9.9% at 33.7% for TXN.
How much would $10,000 in TXN have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in TXN over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of TXN over the same span and TXN's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in TXN at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $277,580 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of TXN, and APH finished highest, at $3,002,572.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 223 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of TXN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- APH$3M+29,926% total · +21.7% a year
- KLAC$1M+10,976% total · +17.6% a year
- ASML$984,088+9,741% total · +17.1% a year
- AMAT$594,575+5,846% total · +15.1% a year
- ADI$385,909+3,759% total · +13.4% a year
- TXN$277,580+2,676% total · +12.1% a year
- FLEX$184,862+1,749% total · +10.6% a year
- SWKS$176,981+1,670% total · +10.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- STM$56,167+462% total · +6.1% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,237 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of TXN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AVGO$79,117+691% total · +51.2% a year
- KLAC$61,203+512% total · +43.7% a year
- APH$48,728+387% total · +37.3% a year
- AMAT$41,406+314% total · +32.9% a year
- ADI$25,751+158% total · +20.8% a year
- AAPL$24,129+141% total · +19.3% a year
- FFIV$22,395+124% total · +17.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- TXN$16,791+67.9% total · +10.9% a year
TXN at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- TXN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 85.8%, from March 2000 to October 2002. It took about 14 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, TXN's best was 1999, when it returned 126%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 52.8%. It lost money in ten of those years.
- TXN is 16.0% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $254B
- Industry
- Semiconductors
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +58.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +105%+27.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +60.5%+9.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- +424%+18.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +126%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −52.8%2008
- Losing years
- 10 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 33.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.45return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −85.8%Mar 2000 to Oct 2002
- From its all-time high
- −16.0%below the peak
TXN against the whole market
Where TXN ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does TXN rank among all stocks?
This section ranks TXN on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how TXN stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- TXN's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 2% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | TXN | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +58.7% | 432 of 3,287 | top 13% |
| 3-year return | +105% | 879 of 3,017 | top 29% |
| 5-year return | +60.5% | 989 of 2,893 | top 34% |
| 10-year return | +424% | 390 of 2,202 | top 18% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 33.7% | 1,039 of 2,893 | top 36% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.45 | 1,083 of 2,893 | top 37% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −33.4% | 48 of 2,187 | top 2% |
What has beaten TXN on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). TXN sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than TXN with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 302 stocks and 293 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than TXN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 16% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half TXN's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 27% less than TXN's 33.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.45 for TXN.
- None of TXN's popular alternatives made it, but MOG-A (industrial automation theme) did: 36.6% a year at 32.0% volatility, 5% less than TXN's 33.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to TXN; faint dots are 90 more of the 595 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than TXN?
Investments that beat TXN over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among TXN's popular alternatives, ADI and APH earned more than TXN over the past 5 years with similar volatility: ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 33.7%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AAPL (computer hardware) and MSFT (software) earned more than TXN with less volatility over the past 5 years. AAPL returned 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 33.7%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 9.9% at 33.7% for TXN.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat TXN over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks TXN's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than TXN follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than TXN's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× TXN's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than TXN's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with TXN?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.61 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against TXN. 2 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.84 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Semiconductors and the categories next to it (Semiconductor Equipment, Computer Hardware, Communications Equipment, Software), plus TXN's specific themes. 25 of 146 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.22 | — | ||
FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.47 | — | |
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.31 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.31 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.67 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 918 of 3,467 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.03 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.06 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.24 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.13 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.06 | 0.40% | ||
PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.57 | 0.79% | |
BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Higher return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | 0.35 | — | |
What these numbers mean for TXN
- Annual return
- TXN returned 9.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $16,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- TXN's volatility over the past 5 years was 33.7%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TXN's return lands within 33.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- TXN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.45, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so TXN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- TXN's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 33.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 33.4% fall takes a 50.2% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, TXN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.61 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TXN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TXN holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 595 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than TXN with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with TXN | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.03 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.06 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.32 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.24 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.27 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.09 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.07 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.13 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.49 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.34 | — | |
| 11 | Same or nearby category | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.38 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.29 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.12 | — | |
| 14 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.36 | — |
| 15 | Same or nearby category | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.22 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.06 | 0.40% | |
| 17 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.50 | — |
| 18 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +13.3% | 23.8% | 0.65 | −49.7% | — | 0.21 | — |
| 19 | SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +20.3% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +430% | 0.64 | — |
| 20 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.61 | 0.21% | |
| 21 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.64 | 0.59% |
| 22 | ARMKAramark · Food Services | Whole market | +17.9% | 28.5% | 0.72 | −72.3% | +137% | 0.41 | — |
| 23 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.63 | 0.85% |
| 24 | PAGPenske Automotive Group, Inc. · Specialty Retail | Whole market | +18.3% | 31.9% | 0.69 | −60.0% | +528% | 0.39 | — |
| 25 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.66 | 0.15% |
| 26 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.28 | — |
| 27 | WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +15.3% | 28.4% | 0.65 | −44.1% | +539% | 0.36 | — |
| 28 | AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +18.8% | 31.9% | 0.70 | −78.5% | +185% | 0.43 | — |
| 29 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.19 | — |
| 30 | AVTAvnet, Inc. · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +22.1% | 30.7% | 0.81 | −58.4% | +173% | 0.78 | — |
| 31 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.11 | — |
| 32 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.37 | — |
| 33 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.64 | 0.19% |
| 34 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.65 | 0.40% |
| 35 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.47 | 0.27% |
| 36 | CNOCNO Financial Group, Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +18.8% | 28.1% | 0.76 | −63.8% | +342% | 0.31 | — |
| 37 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.59 | 0.15% |
| 38 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.47 | — |
| 39 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.35 | — |
| 40 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.31 | 0.58% |
| 41 | QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund · Technology | Whole market | +13.0% | 30.3% | 0.56 | −45.5% | +531% | 0.62 | 0.55% |
| 42 | DACDanaos Corporation · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +20.6% | 32.0% | 0.75 | −94.6% | +449% | 0.31 | — |
| 43 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.46 | — | |
| 44 | HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +12.6% | 25.8% | 0.59 | −38.7% | +373% | 0.27 | 0.60% |
| 45 | OFGOFG Bancorp · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.5% | 28.7% | 0.77 | −61.2% | +580% | 0.33 | — |
| 46 | JAVAJPMorgan Active Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.5% | 0.82 | −16.5% | — | — | 0.44% |
| 47 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.26 | — |
| 48 | BKLCBNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.8% | 17.3% | 0.84 | −26.2% | — | 0.59 | 0.00% |
| 49 | RBCAARepublic Bancorp, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.8% | 27.9% | 0.64 | −44.7% | +318% | 0.35 | — |
| 50 | HBTHBT Financial, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +18.9% | 28.7% | 0.75 | −54.0% | — | 0.27 | — |
| 51 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.24 | 0.61% |
| 52 | IGPTInvesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF · Technology | Whole market | +14.3% | 30.1% | 0.60 | −50.1% | +525% | 0.63 | 0.57% |
| 53 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.48 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.17 | — | |
| 55 | FBIZFirst Business Financial Services, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +23.1% | 29.4% | 0.85 | −50.2% | +307% | 0.28 | — |
| 56 | GSUSGoldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.4% | 17.2% | 0.77 | −25.6% | — | 0.60 | 0.09% |
| 57 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.55 | 0.09% |
| 58 | RCBCRiver City Bank · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.6% | 27.2% | 0.64 | −45.5% | +345% | -0.03 | — |
| 59 | BWFGBankwell Financial Group, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +20.1% | 28.5% | 0.79 | −64.7% | +240% | 0.21 | — |
| 60 | CBNKCapital Bancorp, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +12.1% | 27.4% | 0.55 | −53.7% | — | 0.34 | — |
| 61 | TECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.1% | 23.9% | 0.64 | −41.6% | — | 0.54 | 0.30% |
| 62 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.22 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.06 | — | |
| 64 | INFLHorizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.8% | 17.8% | 0.72 | −21.3% | — | 0.40 | 0.85% |
| 65 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.30 | — | |
| 66 | FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −19.4% | +121% | 0.55 | 0.75% |
| 67 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.35 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.29 | — | |
| 69 | SIXAETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.8% | 12.7% | 1.01 | −18.4% | — | 0.54 | 0.31% |
| 70 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.34 | — | |
| 71 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.24 | 0.48% |
| 72 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.34 | 0.40% |
| 73 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.21 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.18 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.45 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.37 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.62 | 0.18% | |
| 78 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.28 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.22 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.04 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.10 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.07 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.31 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | -0.03 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.13 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +521% | 0.48 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +627% | 0.51 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.38 | — | |
| 89 | BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | 0.35 | — |
| 90 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.34 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.19 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | 0.14 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +151% | 0.14 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.40 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.59 | 0.09% | |
| 96 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.38 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +13.1% | 29.5% | 0.57 | −64.5% | +141% | 0.22 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.30 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.38 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | +234% | 0.41 | — |
TXN against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against TXN, compared period by period and year by year.
How do TXN's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at TXN, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only APH was both more rewarding and calmer than TXN over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Ten of the 20 popular alternatives earned less than TXN over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, TXN returned 9.9% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (33.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than TXN with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | +38.7% | 46.7% |
| FLEX Flex Ltd. | +36.0% | 48.2% |
| APH Amphenol Corporation | +33.8% | 32.2% |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | +25.8% | 47.4% |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | +20.9% | 55.4% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | +19.5% | 34.1% |
| SITM SiTime Corporation | +17.5% | 77.8% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | +17.3% | 43.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | +10.7% | 55.9% |
| TXN This pageTexas Instruments Incorporated | +9.9% | 33.7% |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | +8.1% | 48.3% |
| MXL MaxLinear, Inc. | +7.3% | 83.3% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | +5.7% | 42.3% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | +2.5% | 45.9% |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | +2.2% | 47.7% |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | +1.1% | 53.4% |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | −1.1% | 50.0% |
| NVTS Navitas Semiconductor Corp | −7.3% | 124% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | −10.8% | 42.9% |
| POWI Power Integrations, Inc. | −12.9% | 46.6% |
Has TXN consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares TXN with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than TXN helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 20 popular alternatives, ADI, outperformed TXN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- AVGO outperformed TXN over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so TXN has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than TXN over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated (this page) | — | +2.6% | −1.7% | +20.1% | +59.1% | +58.7% | +105% | +60.5% | +424% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | — | $254B | — |
| ADI QualifiedAnalog Devices, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +3.7% | +6.9% | +4.8% | +46.3% | +63.3% | +150% | +144% | +652% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | — | $192B | — |
| AMAT SemiconductorsApplied Materials, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −12.8% | −22.9% | +3.7% | +51.2% | +78.5% | +209% | +215% | +1,488% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | — | $321B | — |
| APH Hardware, Equipment & PartsAmphenol Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −1.6% | +5.5% | +4.1% | +14.3% | +25.6% | +311% | +329% | +965% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | — | $196B | — |
| KLAC SemiconductorsKLA Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | −12.1% | −22.0% | −10.2% | +27.4% | +41.0% | +258% | +413% | +2,534% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | — | $211B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| MPWR SemiconductorsMonolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −2.1% | −5.9% | −16.0% | +34.0% | +21.9% | +204% | +159% | +1,659% | 55.4% | 0.62 | −51.6% | — | $61B | — |
| ASML SemiconductorsASML Holding N.V. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −4.7% | −6.1% | +10.8% | +40.8% | +57.5% | +188% | +123% | +1,628% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | — | $630B | — |
| FLEX Hardware, Equipment & PartsFlex Ltd. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −21.6% | −27.0% | +3.8% | +37.4% | +39.4% | +263% | +365% | +534% | 48.2% | 0.88 | −70.0% | — | $32B | — |
| ON SemiconductorsON Semiconductor Corporation | 1/5 short2/3 long | +5.4% | −12.8% | −11.6% | +33.4% | +37.8% | −10.9% | +66.0% | +540% | 55.9% | 0.46 | −70.4% | — | $29B | — |
| SITM SemiconductorsSiTime Corporation | 1/5 short2/3 long | −22.1% | −10.5% | −5.9% | +34.4% | +70.6% | +364% | +124% | — | 77.8% | 0.60 | −78.1% | — | $15B | — |
| SLAB SemiconductorsSilicon Laboratories Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +0.1% | +1.7% | +3.3% | +67.6% | +60.8% | +115% | +47.7% | +277% | 48.3% | 0.39 | −59.0% | — | $7.4B | — |
| MXL SemiconductorsMaxLinear, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −14.5% | −2.0% | +132% | +297% | +317% | +266% | +42.5% | +277% | 83.3% | 0.49 | −88.1% | — | $6.7B | — |
| STM SemiconductorsSTMicroelectronics N.V. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −11.2% | −25.8% | +3.3% | +68.2% | +52.9% | +18.8% | +11.6% | +525% | 47.7% | 0.28 | −66.6% | — | $41B | — |
| SWKS SemiconductorsSkyworks Solutions, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −8.4% | +36.0% | +37.9% | +28.9% | +10.2% | −2.8% | −43.5% | +29.2% | 42.9% | -0.05 | −72.9% | — | $12B | — |
| DIOD SemiconductorsDiodes Incorporated | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.9% | −2.2% | −11.7% | +66.0% | +49.4% | +14.1% | −5.6% | +324% | 50.0% | 0.23 | −69.5% | — | $3.9B | — |
| MCHP SemiconductorsMicrochip Technology Incorporated | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.4% | −5.2% | −4.6% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +8.5% | +13.0% | +207% | 45.9% | 0.28 | −63.8% | — | $41B | — |
| NXPI SemiconductorsNXP Semiconductors N.V. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +2.2% | −10.7% | +8.2% | +8.8% | +10.0% | +34.9% | +31.9% | +159% | 42.3% | 0.34 | −53.3% | — | $60B | — |
| POWI SemiconductorsPower Integrations, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −5.1% | −33.7% | −23.5% | +27.4% | +5.5% | −30.5% | −49.8% | +66.8% | 46.6% | -0.07 | −70.7% | — | $2.6B | — |
| ALGM SemiconductorsAllegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.5% | −26.9% | −16.6% | +26.0% | +11.2% | +17.5% | +5.5% | — | 53.4% | 0.28 | −68.7% | — | $6.3B | — |
| NVTS SemiconductorsNavitas Semiconductor Corp | 0/5 short0/3 long | −28.1% | −24.3% | −33.8% | +4.3% | −48.9% | +56.4% | −31.7% | — | 124% | 0.44 | −92.0% | — | $2.3B | — |
How did TXN do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where TXN ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with TXN and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- TXN finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, SITM came out ahead of TXN most often, in five of the six years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, TXN finished in the top quarter in four of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 16 of 21.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of TXN; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places TXN among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of TXN | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXN This pageTexas Instruments Incorporated | — | −4.5% | +13.1% | +6.4% | −9.9% | +17.5% | +31.7% | +39.6% | −7.2% | +46.8% | +36.7% | +5.1% | +25.1% | +46.3% | +7.9% | −8.8% | +27.0% | +72.0% | −52.8% | +17.0% | −9.8% | +30.7% | −15.9% | +96.6% | −46.2% | −40.8% | −1.8% | +126% | +90.7% | +42.3% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 29 | 16 of 21 | 5 of 21 | 16 of 21 | 4 of 21 | 17 of 20 | 13 of 19 | 15 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 7 of 18 | 8 of 18 | 8 of 18 | 11 of 18 | 8 of 18 | 4 of 16 | 10 of 15 | 11 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 14 of 15 | 3 of 15 | 5 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 12 of 14 | 5 of 12 | 9 of 12 | 4 of 12 | 5 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +29.8% | +8.8% | +23.4% | −4.9% | +21.0% | +26.9% | +41.3% | −1.6% | +25.3% | +35.0% | +2.4% | +12.2% | +24.7% | +21.2% | −2.4% | +22.7% | +71.5% | −38.0% | −1.5% | −6.7% | −1.9% | −18.7% | +91.4% | −46.2% | −13.3% | +10.1% | +197% | +13.3% | +8.9% |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +59.6% | +1.1% | +68.0% | −37.5% | +83.6% | +43.3% | +89.9% | −34.9% | +59.8% | +75.7% | −23.5% | +43.7% | +58.6% | +10.2% | −21.9% | +3.0% | +40.4% | −42.1% | −2.6% | +3.8% | +5.4% | −23.8% | +72.3% | −35.0% | +5.0% | −39.7% | +197% | +41.7% | +67.9% |
| APH Amphenol Corporation | 14 of 29 | +97.6% | +41.6% | +31.5% | −11.9% | +35.0% | +22.1% | +34.9% | −6.9% | +32.1% | +31.0% | −1.0% | +21.7% | +38.7% | +43.6% | −13.6% | +13.9% | +92.9% | −48.2% | +50.3% | +40.5% | +21.1% | +15.0% | +68.1% | −20.7% | +22.9% | +17.3% | +120% | −45.8% | +150% |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 11 of 29 | +94.5% | +9.4% | +56.0% | −11.2% | +68.1% | +47.9% | +104% | −12.4% | +36.7% | +17.0% | +2.1% | +39.4% | +39.0% | +2.1% | +28.8% | +9.9% | +69.8% | −53.5% | −2.7% | +1.9% | +6.2% | −20.3% | +65.8% | −28.7% | +46.6% | −39.3% | +157% | +11.9% | +8.9% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 13 of 16 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% | +46.1% | +93.4% | +70.0% | +12.0% | +3.0% | +55.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 14 of 21 | +54.4% | −5.5% | +79.8% | −27.8% | +35.5% | +107% | +54.8% | +4.5% | +38.2% | +30.1% | +30.0% | +44.9% | +55.6% | +54.9% | −8.8% | −31.1% | +90.1% | −41.3% | +93.3% | −25.9% | +61.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 16 of 29 | +55.8% | −7.7% | +39.9% | −30.5% | +64.1% | +66.3% | +93.2% | −9.7% | +56.5% | +27.9% | −17.1% | +16.2% | +46.9% | +19.7% | +10.4% | +13.2% | +90.9% | −41.4% | +22.3% | +22.7% | +26.1% | −20.6% | +140% | −51.0% | −24.4% | −40.5% | +273% | −9.7% | +171% |
| FLEX Flex Ltd. | 13 of 29 | +57.4% | +73.2% | +3.3% | +17.1% | +1.9% | +42.5% | +65.8% | −57.7% | +25.2% | +28.2% | +0.3% | +43.9% | +25.1% | +9.7% | −27.9% | +7.4% | +186% | −78.8% | +5.1% | +10.0% | −24.5% | −6.6% | +80.7% | −65.9% | −15.8% | +24.1% | +115% | +148% | +24.2% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 10 of 25 | −14.1% | −24.5% | +33.9% | −8.2% | +108% | +34.3% | +47.7% | −21.1% | +64.1% | +30.2% | −3.3% | +22.9% | +16.9% | −8.7% | −21.9% | +12.0% | +159% | −61.7% | +17.3% | +36.9% | +21.8% | −29.9% | +373% | −33.8% | −60.6% | — | — | — | — |
| SITM SiTime Corporation | 5 of 6 | +64.6% | +75.7% | +20.1% | −65.3% | +161% | +339% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 10 of 25 | +5.2% | −6.1% | −2.5% | −34.3% | +62.1% | +9.8% | +47.2% | −10.8% | +35.9% | +33.9% | +1.9% | +10.0% | +3.6% | −3.7% | −5.7% | −4.9% | +95.2% | −33.8% | +8.0% | −5.5% | +3.8% | −18.4% | +127% | −43.4% | +134% | — | — | — | — |
| MXL MaxLinear, Inc. | 5 of 15 | −11.9% | −16.8% | −30.0% | −55.0% | +97.4% | +80.0% | +20.6% | −33.4% | +21.2% | +48.0% | +98.8% | −29.0% | +108% | +5.7% | −55.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 12 of 29 | +5.3% | −49.6% | +41.6% | −26.8% | +32.4% | +38.9% | +96.4% | −35.7% | +95.1% | +76.9% | −6.7% | −2.5% | +15.2% | +30.1% | −40.6% | +15.9% | +43.9% | −52.3% | −21.1% | +2.9% | −6.1% | −28.1% | +39.0% | −38.3% | −26.0% | −15.2% | +288% | +27.8% | −12.7% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 15 of 29 | −25.5% | −18.9% | +26.5% | −40.0% | +2.7% | +28.4% | +84.1% | −28.3% | +28.7% | −1.2% | +6.7% | +156% | +40.6% | +25.2% | −43.4% | +102% | +156% | −34.8% | +20.2% | +38.9% | −45.9% | +8.4% | +0.9% | −60.5% | −41.1% | +29.1% | +139% | +123% | +104% |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | 13 of 29 | −20.0% | −23.4% | +5.8% | −30.7% | +55.8% | +25.1% | +74.7% | +12.5% | +11.7% | +11.7% | −16.7% | +17.0% | +35.8% | −18.5% | −21.1% | +32.2% | +237% | −79.8% | +27.2% | +14.2% | +106% | +19.2% | +196% | +44.7% | −35.8% | −27.8% | +330% | −48.8% | +35.0% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 12 of 29 | +14.6% | −34.9% | +30.9% | −18.0% | +27.5% | +33.7% | +48.1% | −16.7% | +39.5% | +41.6% | +6.3% | +4.0% | +42.4% | −7.1% | +10.3% | +24.6% | +57.8% | −34.8% | −0.7% | +4.4% | +22.6% | −19.9% | +36.8% | −5.1% | +76.5% | −27.9% | +85.0% | +23.6% | −11.6% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 8 of 15 | +6.4% | −8.0% | +48.4% | −29.2% | +44.8% | +26.6% | +75.7% | −37.0% | +19.5% | +16.3% | +10.3% | +66.3% | +74.5% | +71.2% | −26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| POWI Power Integrations, Inc. | 13 of 28 | −41.3% | −24.0% | +15.6% | −22.1% | +14.1% | +66.7% | +63.7% | −16.3% | +9.3% | +40.8% | −5.1% | −6.6% | +67.2% | +1.9% | −17.0% | +11.1% | +83.7% | −42.1% | +46.6% | −1.5% | +20.4% | −40.9% | +96.8% | −25.6% | +98.6% | −76.0% | +283% | +171% | — |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 2 of 5 | +20.7% | −27.8% | +0.8% | −17.0% | +35.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NVTS Navitas Semiconductor Corp | 2 of 4 | +100% | −55.8% | +130% | −79.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How TXN has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were TXN's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents TXN's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of TXN's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: TXN fell 48.6% from September 1995 to July 1996, while the S&P 500 rose 8.9%.
- The slowest recovery came after TXN fell 85.8% from March 2000 to October 2002; it did not regain that peak until November 2016, 14 years later.
Green means TXN fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | TXN fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −85.8% | −42.7% | Mar 2000 | Oct 2002 | 2.6 years | Nov 2016 | 14.1 years |
| No named crash | −68.8% | — | Oct 1987 | Oct 1990 | 3 years | Jun 1993 | 2.7 years |
| No named crash | −48.6% | +8.9% | Sep 1995 | Jul 1996 | 10 months | Feb 1997 | 7 months |
| No named crash | −42.0% | −1.3% | Oct 1997 | Dec 1997 | 2 months | Nov 1998 | 11 months |
| No named crash | −33.4% | −13.6% | Nov 2024 | Apr 2025 | 5 months | Jul 2025 | 3 months |
How did TXN do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far TXN, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than TXN in most of the crashes they both traded through.
- TXN fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when TXN fell 85.4% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than TXN.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXN This pageTexas Instruments Incorporated | — | −2.6% | −21.7% | −29.8% | −19.5% | −9.3% | −18.4% | −21.6% | −1.3% | −61.4% | −85.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −2.6% | −22.6% | −33.6% | −18.1% | −7.2% | −22.7% | −18.6% | −1.2% | −55.0% | −82.0% |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −3.6% | −54.2% | −43.6% | −26.4% | −9.7% | −18.8% | −24.5% | −1.6% | −61.7% | −82.0% |
| APH Amphenol Corporation | 2 of 10 | −3.8% | −27.8% | −33.8% | −20.4% | −7.5% | −19.0% | −21.9% | −1.7% | −63.6% | −60.7% |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 3 of 10 | −5.9% | −37.6% | −33.8% | −21.6% | −7.5% | −13.5% | −23.0% | −2.8% | −71.8% | −73.2% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 3 of 8 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −5.1% | −39.7% | −27.9% | −21.4% | −9.8% | −18.1% | −32.0% | −5.4% | −72.3% | — |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 2 of 10 | −2.9% | −48.4% | −37.9% | −24.4% | −7.5% | −22.1% | −17.7% | −2.7% | −64.1% | −90.0% |
| FLEX Flex Ltd. | 1 of 10 | −8.0% | −24.2% | −57.5% | −48.0% | −6.1% | −22.8% | −27.3% | −1.8% | −87.9% | −86.7% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 1 of 9 | −6.4% | −34.0% | −59.6% | −23.7% | −12.2% | −39.2% | −28.5% | 0.0% | −80.0% | — |
| SITM SiTime Corporation | 0 of 3 | −6.1% | −71.0% | −46.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 1 of 9 | −3.4% | −42.9% | −34.8% | −22.7% | −10.1% | −32.0% | −25.2% | −1.9% | −60.6% | — |
| MXL MaxLinear, Inc. | 1 of 8 | −7.2% | −58.4% | −56.6% | −23.8% | −4.0% | −23.7% | −33.7% | −2.8% | — | — |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 1 of 10 | −3.2% | −40.6% | −49.6% | −31.0% | −9.1% | −31.6% | −36.9% | −3.2% | −77.2% | −83.5% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −3.0% | −50.0% | −43.0% | −32.3% | −5.3% | −38.6% | −37.2% | −3.4% | −66.0% | −95.7% |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | 2 of 10 | −4.0% | −45.5% | −33.1% | −18.6% | −5.0% | −29.6% | −34.3% | −3.4% | −90.1% | −86.5% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 4 of 10 | −3.8% | −35.3% | −49.0% | −25.9% | −14.4% | −18.6% | −12.7% | −0.4% | −55.2% | −58.7% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 1 of 7 | −4.2% | −38.8% | −52.0% | −27.4% | −4.0% | −35.5% | −39.8% | — | — | — |
| POWI Power Integrations, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −3.3% | −35.7% | −21.7% | −26.1% | −7.5% | −20.9% | −24.3% | 0.0% | −57.5% | −84.3% |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −5.9% | −44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NVTS Navitas Semiconductor Corp | 0 of 2 | −8.6% | −76.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does TXN move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares TXN with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Nine of the 17 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than TXN's 1.04, led by KLAC, AVGO and APH.
- KLAC took just 59% of the S&P 500's losses, against 108% for TXN, while still keeping 152% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, TXN captured 113% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 108% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.18. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than TXN's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXN This pageTexas Instruments Incorporated | 113% | 108% | 1.04 | 1.18 |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 152% | 59% | 2.57 | 1.32 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| APH Amphenol Corporation | 125% | 79% | 1.59 | 1.24 |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 152% | 97% | 1.58 | 1.51 |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 156% | 107% | 1.46 | 1.31 |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 170% | 132% | 1.29 | 1.44 |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 117% | 92% | 1.26 | 1.20 |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 122% | 104% | 1.17 | 1.72 |
| FLEX Flex Ltd. | 136% | 124% | 1.10 | 1.57 |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | 128% | 146% | 0.88 | 1.53 |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 161% | 185% | 0.87 | 1.95 |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 113% | 130% | 0.87 | 1.18 |
| MXL MaxLinear, Inc. | 140% | 169% | 0.83 | 2.95 |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 127% | 170% | 0.75 | 1.72 |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 115% | 157% | 0.73 | 1.63 |
| POWI Power Integrations, Inc. | 89% | 133% | 0.67 | 1.28 |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 88% | 149% | 0.59 | 1.31 |
What diversifies TXN?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with TXN's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing TXN with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in TXN into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+10.9% for TXN alone, +16.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of TXN over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.34 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- XLE made money in six of the ten calendar years in which TXN lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which TXN lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% TXN and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2011 | 2008 | 2006 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated (this page) | 1.00 | +60.5% | 0.45 | −4.5% | −9.9% | −7.2% | −8.8% | −52.8% | −9.8% | −15.9% | −46.2% | −40.8% | −1.8% | 34.7% | +10.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.34 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.4% | +12.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.24 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 28.5% | +14.9% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.34 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | −8.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.9% | +12.6% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.48 | +62.9% | 0.99 | +9.1% | −5.6% | −4.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | +11.7% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.35 | +140% | 0.97 | +78.0% | −5.2% | −15.3% | −9.8% | −36.8% | +49.2% | +30.2% | −13.6% | −9.2% | −11.8% | 29.3% | +13.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.06 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +22.6% | — | — | — | — | 28.2% | +13.5% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.18 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | +64.4% | −18.2% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +18.0% | +33.8% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | 29.1% | +14.5% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.22 | +111% | 0.89 | +5.8% | +25.5% | −12.6% | +10.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.8% | +13.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2011 | 2008 | 2006 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated (this page) | 1.00 | +60.5% | 0.45 | −4.5% | −9.9% | −7.2% | −8.8% | −52.8% | −9.8% | −15.9% | −46.2% | −40.8% | −1.8% | 34.7% | +10.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | -0.03 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −5.8% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 28.1% | +17.4% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.29 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −26.0% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 33.1% | +29.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.33 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +0.8% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +38.9% | +40.0% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 31.9% | +25.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.10 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.4% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −1.2% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 27.7% | +16.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.13 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | −8.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29.3% | +19.3% |
Common questions
What was TXN's worst drawdown?
TXN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 85.8%, from March 2000 to October 2002. It took about 14 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were TXN's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, TXN's best year was 1999, when it returned 126%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -52.8%.
Is there a better investment than TXN?
Among TXN's popular alternatives, ADI and APH earned more than TXN over the past 5 years with similar volatility: ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 33.7%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AAPL (computer hardware) and MSFT (software) earned more than TXN with less volatility over the past 5 years. AAPL returned 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against 9.9% a year at 33.7%.
Is TXN more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. TXN's volatility over the past 5 years was 33.7%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TXN's return lands within 33.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is TXN's Sharpe ratio?
TXN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.45, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so TXN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is TXN with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, TXN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.61 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TXN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TXN holding.
What are the best alternatives to TXN?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed TXN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ADI.
Did TXN outperform the S&P 500?
TXN finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -4.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did TXN do in stock market crashes?
TXN fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when TXN fell 85.4% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies TXN?
These had a low correlation with TXN over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.34), DXJ (correlation 0.24) and EMLP (correlation 0.34); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.03), CLS (correlation 0.29) and FIX (correlation 0.33). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than TXN's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of TXN's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to TXN
ADIAnalog Devices
AMATApplied Materials
APHAmphenol
KLACKLA
AVGOBroadcom
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems
ASMLASML Holding
STMSTMicroelectronics
MCHPMicrochip Technology
NXPINXP Semiconductors