Relative Intelligence · Semiconductors

How STMicroelectronics (STM) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on STM alone. It places STM (STMicroelectronics N.V.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where STM stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: STM's full trading record, from December 1994 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowSTM has gone against the market, falling 25.8% over the past 3 months while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. STM is 42.5% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is STM's own: it fell 25.8% over the past 3 months while the semiconductors ETF SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) fell 2.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its semiconductor peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: ADI (Analog Devices) rose 6.9%, while POWI (Power Integrations) fell 33.7%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, STM rose 52.9% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. On the flip side, the long record (ahead of 87% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 10 years) has not carried into the past 3 years (behind 68% of them). By year ↓
- Long termSTM turned $10,000 into $62,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, the past 5 years only trailed the S&P 500 (11.6% against 81.7%), after a much stronger decade (525% against 321%). Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, STM has typically fallen 1.8 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, STM has a correlation of 0.59 over 5 years, more closely than 89% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, STM's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.72: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.2 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.0 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- MSFT (Microsoft, software) and ASX (ASE Technology Holding, semiconductors) earned more than STM with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 2.2% a year at 47.7%.
- Whole market
- 1,756 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than STM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in STM have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in STM over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of STM over the same span and STM's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in STM at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $56,167 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Seven of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of STM, and ASML finished highest, at $984,088.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 716 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of STM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ASML$984,088+9,741% total · +17.1% a year
- AMAT$594,575+5,846% total · +15.1% a year
- ADI$385,909+3,759% total · +13.4% a year
- DIOD$373,720+3,637% total · +13.3% a year
- TXN$277,580+2,676% total · +12.1% a year
- MCHP$217,246+2,072% total · +11.2% a year
- SWKS$176,981+1,670% total · +10.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- STM$56,167+462% total · +6.1% a year
- VSH$39,124+291% total · +4.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,992 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of STM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MTSI$43,907+339% total · +34.4% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- UMC$28,085+181% total · +22.9% a year
- ADI$25,751+158% total · +20.8% a year
- ASML$25,473+155% total · +20.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- VSH$17,865+78.6% total · +12.3% a year
- TXN$16,791+67.9% total · +10.9% a year
- SLAB$15,810+58.1% total · +9.6% a year
- STM$12,762+27.6% total · +5.0% a year
STM at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- STM is still 42.5% below its all-time high.
- STM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1994 was 94.3%, from March 2000 to March 2009. It took about 12 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, STM's best was 1999, when it returned 288%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 52.3%. It lost money in 14 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $41B
- Industry
- Semiconductors
- Price history from
- December 1994
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +52.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +18.8%+5.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +11.6%+2.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +525%+20.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +288%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −52.3%2008
- Losing years
- 14 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 47.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.28return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −94.3%Mar 2000 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −42.5%below the peak
STM against the whole market
Where STM ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does STM rank among all stocks?
This section ranks STM on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how STM stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- STM's 10-year return ranks in the top 13% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | STM | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +52.9% | 516 of 3,287 | top 16% |
| 3-year return | +18.8% | 2,040 of 3,017 | bottom 33% |
| 5-year return | +11.6% | 1,571 of 2,893 | bottom 47% |
| 10-year return | +525% | 286 of 2,202 | top 13% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 47.7% | 1,830 of 2,893 | bottom 38% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.28 | 1,599 of 2,893 | bottom 46% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −66.6% | 1,170 of 2,187 | bottom 48% |
What has beaten STM on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). STM sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than STM with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 996 stocks and 760 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than STM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 48% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half STM's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 48% less than STM's 47.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.28 for STM. ATI earned the most, 61.8% a year, while still swinging less than STM (42.9% against 47.7%).
- Among STM's popular alternatives, TSM, ADI and UMC are in the region. TSM earned 31.5% a year against 2.2% a year for STM, at 38.5% volatility, 19% less than STM's 47.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to STM; faint dots are 89 more of the 1,756 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than STM?
Investments that beat STM over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among STM's popular alternatives, ADI, TSM and ASML earned more than STM with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 2.2% a year at 47.7%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSFT (software) and ASX (semiconductors) earned more than STM with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 2.2% a year at 47.7%.
- Across the whole market, 1,756 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than STM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat STM over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks STM's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than STM follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than STM's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× STM's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than STM's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with STM?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +2.2% | 47.7% | 0.28 | −66.6% | +525% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.59 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against STM. 13 of 21 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.77 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.60 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.4% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | +1,628% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | 0.76 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.9% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | +1,610% | 0.71 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +25.8% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | +1,488% | 0.57 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Semiconductors and the categories next to it (Semiconductor Equipment, Computer Hardware, Communications Equipment, Software), plus STM's specific themes. 78 of 129 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.71 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.24 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 0.35 | — | ||
ERICTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) · Communications Equipment | Similar return, lower volatility | +1.7% | 35.7% | 0.23 | −66.6% | +161% | 0.37 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,090 of 3,483 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.04 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.28 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.04 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.67 | 0.18% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.67 | 0.09% | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.36 | — | ||
CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc. · Environmental Services | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +2.8% | 28.1% | 0.24 | −37.7% | +740% | 0.16 | — | |
What these numbers mean for STM
- Annual return
- STM returned 2.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $11,200. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- STM's volatility over the past 5 years was 47.7%, 2.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, STM's return lands within 47.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- STM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.28, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so STM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- STM's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 66.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 66.6% fall takes a 200% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, STM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.59 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against STM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a STM holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,756 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than STM with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with STM | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.04 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.28 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.04 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.67 | 0.18% | |
| 5 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.16 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.51 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.67 | 0.09% | |
| 8 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.07 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +31.4% | 42.1% | 0.86 | −51.5% | +616% | 0.52 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.29 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.32 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.13 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.50 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.21 | — | |
| 15 | Same or nearby category | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.23 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.04 | — | |
| 17 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.40 | — |
| 18 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | 0.08 | — |
| 19 | Same or nearby category | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.71 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.59 | 0.03% | |
| 21 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.59 | 0.03% | |
| 22 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.07 | — |
| 23 | Whole market | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 0.37 | — | |
| 24 | WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +15.3% | 28.4% | 0.65 | −44.1% | +539% | 0.45 | — |
| 25 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.18 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | -0.06 | — | |
| 27 | Same or nearby category | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.24 | — | |
| 28 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.73 | 0.40% |
| 29 | Popular alternative | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.77 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.04 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.30 | — | |
| 32 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.34 | 0.48% |
| 33 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.30 | 0.40% |
| 34 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.11 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.00 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.16 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.18 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.14 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.03 | — | |
| 40 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | 0.00 | — |
| 41 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.44 | 0.03% | |
| 42 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | -0.01 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | -0.05 | — | |
| 44 | FXLFirst Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund · Technology | Whole market | +11.0% | 26.2% | 0.53 | −38.5% | +523% | 0.67 | 0.60% |
| 45 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.53 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.16 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.35 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | 0.07 | — | |
| 49 | AGMFederal Agricultural Mortgage · Financial - Credit Services | Whole market | +14.5% | 30.0% | 0.60 | −53.3% | +571% | 0.37 | — |
| 50 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.41 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.21 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.46 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | -0.04 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.10 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | -0.01 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.22 | — | |
| 57 | IGPTInvesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF · Technology | Whole market | +14.3% | 30.1% | 0.60 | −50.1% | +525% | 0.68 | 0.57% |
| 58 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.39 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.37 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.52 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +198% | 0.54 | 0.03% | |
| 62 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.48 | 0.04% | |
| 63 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.02 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.45 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.13 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | -0.06 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.36 | 0.06% | |
| 68 | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.56 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.36 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.52 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +7.1% | 22.9% | 0.42 | −38.7% | +295% | 0.37 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +7.1% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | +313% | 0.36 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.43 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.32 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.23 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.64 | 0.06% | |
| 77 | Whole market | +12.9% | 20.8% | 0.69 | −51.6% | +184% | -0.06 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.15 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.49 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.09 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.11 | — | |
| 82 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.57 | 0.79% |
| 83 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.1% | 0.57 | −39.0% | +211% | 0.52 | 0.20% | |
| 84 | Whole market | +18.1% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | +312% | 0.18 | — | |
| 85 | Same or nearby category | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.40 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +9.2% | 23.5% | 0.49 | −55.0% | +318% | 0.09 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | -0.03 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.13 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +12.7% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | +309% | 0.25 | — | |
| 90 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.63 | 0.85% |
| 91 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.20 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | -0.09 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +11.9% | 19.4% | 0.68 | −54.4% | +30.4% | 0.05 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +21.7% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | +569% | 0.44 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +8.3% | 23.3% | 0.46 | −40.5% | +446% | 0.39 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.55 | 0.04% | |
| 97 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.48 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +24.1% | 39.9% | 0.74 | −38.2% | — | -0.12 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +13.3% | 30.0% | 0.57 | −39.2% | +711% | 0.41 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.60 | 0.26% |
STM against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against STM, compared period by period and year by year.
How do STM's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at STM, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- 11 of the 21 popular alternatives, led by MTSI, TSM and AMAT, were both more rewarding and calmer than STM over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, STM returned 2.2% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (47.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than STM with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | +32.0% | 47.3% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | +25.8% | 47.4% |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | +20.9% | 55.4% |
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | +19.9% | 43.2% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | +19.5% | 34.1% |
| SITM SiTime Corporation | +17.5% | 77.8% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | +17.3% | 43.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | +10.7% | 55.9% |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | +10.3% | 47.2% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | +9.9% | 33.7% |
| TEL TE Connectivity plc | +9.5% | 28.7% |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | +8.1% | 48.3% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | +5.7% | 42.3% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | +2.5% | 45.9% |
| STM This pageSTMicroelectronics N.V. | +2.2% | 47.7% |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | +1.1% | 53.4% |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | −1.1% | 50.0% |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | −7.8% | 54.7% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | −10.8% | 42.9% |
| POWI Power Integrations, Inc. | −12.9% | 46.6% |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | −23.2% | 41.4% |
Has STM consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares STM with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than STM helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Nine of the 22 popular alternatives, led by ASML, UMC and ADI, outperformed STM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- ASML, UMC and ADI outperformed STM in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- TSM, AMAT and ADI earned more for the risk they took than STM (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than STM over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. (this page) | — | −11.2% | −25.8% | +3.3% | +68.2% | +52.9% | +18.8% | +11.6% | +525% | 47.7% | 0.28 | −66.6% | — | $41B | — |
| ASML QualifiedASML Holding N.V. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.7% | −6.1% | +10.8% | +40.8% | +57.5% | +188% | +123% | +1,628% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | — | $630B | — |
| UMC QualifiedUnited Microelectronics Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −22.7% | −3.1% | +58.4% | +155% | +166% | +202% | +147% | +1,610% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | — | $49B | — |
| ADI QualifiedAnalog Devices, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +3.7% | +6.9% | +4.8% | +46.3% | +63.3% | +150% | +144% | +652% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | — | $192B | — |
| TSM QualifiedTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 3/5 short3/3 long | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| MTSI QualifiedMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −5.8% | −2.5% | −6.5% | +50.3% | +87.4% | +249% | +302% | +588% | 47.3% | 0.83 | −80.8% | — | $20B | — |
| TXN QualifiedTexas Instruments Incorporated | 4/5 short2/3 long | +2.6% | −1.7% | +20.1% | +59.1% | +58.7% | +105% | +60.5% | +424% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | — | $254B | — |
| VSH QualifiedVishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −12.4% | −23.3% | +9.0% | +88.8% | +66.1% | +32.0% | +62.9% | +146% | 47.2% | 0.44 | −63.5% | — | $4.0B | — |
| SLAB QualifiedSilicon Laboratories Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +0.1% | +1.7% | +3.3% | +67.6% | +60.8% | +115% | +47.7% | +277% | 48.3% | 0.39 | −59.0% | — | $7.4B | — |
| NXPI QualifiedNXP Semiconductors N.V. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +2.2% | −10.7% | +8.2% | +8.8% | +10.0% | +34.9% | +31.9% | +159% | 42.3% | 0.34 | −53.3% | — | $60B | — |
| MPWR SemiconductorsMonolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −2.1% | −5.9% | −16.0% | +34.0% | +21.9% | +204% | +159% | +1,659% | 55.4% | 0.62 | −51.6% | — | $61B | — |
| AMAT SemiconductorsApplied Materials, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −12.8% | −22.9% | +3.7% | +51.2% | +78.5% | +209% | +215% | +1,488% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | — | $321B | — |
| ON SemiconductorsON Semiconductor Corporation | 2/5 short2/3 long | +5.4% | −12.8% | −11.6% | +33.4% | +37.8% | −10.9% | +66.0% | +540% | 55.9% | 0.46 | −70.4% | — | $29B | — |
| TEL SemiconductorsTE Connectivity plc | 2/5 short2/3 long | +1.7% | +5.6% | −13.1% | −7.4% | −4.1% | +90.6% | +57.4% | +311% | 28.7% | 0.46 | −47.7% | — | $62B | — |
| SITM SemiconductorsSiTime Corporation | 2/5 short2/3 long | −22.1% | −10.5% | −5.9% | +34.4% | +70.6% | +364% | +124% | — | 77.8% | 0.60 | −78.1% | — | $15B | — |
| SYNA SemiconductorsSynaptics Incorporated | 4/5 short1/3 long | +23.2% | +3.4% | +41.4% | +55.1% | +61.9% | +29.9% | −33.2% | +72.3% | 54.7% | 0.12 | −85.3% | — | $4.7B | — |
| MCHP SemiconductorsMicrochip Technology Incorporated | 2/5 short1/3 long | +1.4% | −5.2% | −4.6% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +8.5% | +13.0% | +207% | 45.9% | 0.28 | −63.8% | — | $41B | — |
| SWKS SemiconductorsSkyworks Solutions, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −8.4% | +36.0% | +37.9% | +28.9% | +10.2% | −2.8% | −43.5% | +29.2% | 42.9% | -0.05 | −72.9% | — | $12B | — |
| DIOD SemiconductorsDiodes Incorporated | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.9% | −2.2% | −11.7% | +66.0% | +49.4% | +14.1% | −5.6% | +324% | 50.0% | 0.23 | −69.5% | — | $3.9B | — |
| APTV Auto - PartsAptiv PLC | 2/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | −21.4% | −25.9% | −42.6% | −46.0% | −51.0% | −73.3% | −10.6% | 41.4% | -0.43 | −75.8% | — | $9.4B | — |
| GFS SemiconductorsGLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −3.0% | −17.0% | −19.7% | +28.0% | +32.7% | −13.2% | — | — | — | — | −61.5% | — | $26B | — |
| POWI SemiconductorsPower Integrations, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.1% | −33.7% | −23.5% | +27.4% | +5.5% | −30.5% | −49.8% | +66.8% | 46.6% | -0.07 | −70.7% | — | $2.6B | — |
| ALGM SemiconductorsAllegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −4.5% | −26.9% | −16.6% | +26.0% | +11.2% | +17.5% | +5.5% | — | 53.4% | 0.28 | −68.7% | — | $6.3B | — |
How did STM do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where STM ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with STM and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Among its popular alternatives, ALGM came out ahead of STM most often, in four of the five years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, STM finished in the top quarter in six of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in ten. In 2025, it ranked 14 of 23.
- STM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of STM; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places STM among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of STM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STM This pageSTMicroelectronics N.V. | — | +5.3% | −49.6% | +41.6% | −26.8% | +32.4% | +38.9% | +96.4% | −35.7% | +95.1% | +76.9% | −6.7% | −2.5% | +15.2% | +30.1% | −40.6% | +15.9% | +43.9% | −52.3% | −21.1% | +2.9% | −6.1% | −28.1% | +39.0% | −38.3% | −26.0% | −15.2% | +288% | +27.8% | −12.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 29 | 14 of 23 | 23 of 23 | 6 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 14 of 22 | 10 of 21 | 1 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 1 of 20 | 1 of 20 | 15 of 20 | 19 of 20 | 16 of 20 | 5 of 19 | 17 of 18 | 8 of 17 | 16 of 17 | 12 of 17 | 15 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 13 of 16 | 12 of 15 | 13 of 15 | 6 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 4 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 5 of 11 | 9 of 9 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 18 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 17 of 29 | +55.8% | −7.7% | +39.9% | −30.5% | +64.1% | +66.3% | +93.2% | −9.7% | +56.5% | +27.9% | −17.1% | +16.2% | +46.9% | +19.7% | +10.4% | +13.2% | +90.9% | −41.4% | +22.3% | +22.7% | +26.1% | −20.6% | +140% | −51.0% | −24.4% | −40.5% | +273% | −9.7% | +171% |
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 14 of 25 | +28.7% | −19.0% | +39.0% | −40.3% | +43.1% | +232% | +55.4% | −21.9% | +42.2% | −2.7% | −13.2% | +15.2% | +5.7% | −2.8% | −26.9% | −16.8% | +98.2% | −37.7% | −28.9% | +15.3% | −2.2% | −23.6% | +52.9% | −58.0% | +33.7% | — | — | — | — |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 18 of 29 | +29.8% | +8.8% | +23.4% | −4.9% | +21.0% | +26.9% | +41.3% | −1.6% | +25.3% | +35.0% | +2.4% | +12.2% | +24.7% | +21.2% | −2.4% | +22.7% | +71.5% | −38.0% | −1.5% | −6.7% | −1.9% | −18.7% | +91.4% | −46.2% | −13.3% | +10.1% | +197% | +13.3% | +8.9% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 16 of 28 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +52.9% | −16.1% | −4.3% | +18.9% | +27.1% | −4.2% | +56.7% | −54.8% | +39.5% | −51.0% | +290% | +13.4% | — |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 8 of 13 | +31.8% | +39.8% | +47.6% | −19.6% | +42.3% | +107% | +83.3% | −55.4% | −29.7% | +13.2% | +30.7% | +84.1% | +13.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 16 of 29 | −4.5% | +13.1% | +6.4% | −9.9% | +17.5% | +31.7% | +39.6% | −7.2% | +46.8% | +36.7% | +5.1% | +25.1% | +46.3% | +7.9% | −8.8% | +27.0% | +72.0% | −52.8% | +17.0% | −9.8% | +30.7% | −15.9% | +96.6% | −46.2% | −40.8% | −1.8% | +126% | +90.7% | +42.3% |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 12 of 29 | −12.2% | −27.9% | +13.0% | +0.7% | +7.4% | −0.5% | +20.6% | −11.9% | +30.0% | +37.1% | −13.1% | +8.5% | +24.7% | +18.2% | −38.8% | +124% | +144% | −70.0% | −15.7% | −1.6% | −8.3% | −34.5% | +105% | −42.6% | +28.9% | −28.3% | +173% | −35.4% | +6.5% |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 13 of 25 | +5.2% | −6.1% | −2.5% | −34.3% | +62.1% | +9.8% | +47.2% | −10.8% | +35.9% | +33.9% | +1.9% | +10.0% | +3.6% | −3.7% | −5.7% | −4.9% | +95.2% | −33.8% | +8.0% | −5.5% | +3.8% | −18.4% | +127% | −43.4% | +134% | — | — | — | — |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 9 of 15 | +6.4% | −8.0% | +48.4% | −29.2% | +44.8% | +26.6% | +75.7% | −37.0% | +19.5% | +16.3% | +10.3% | +66.3% | +74.5% | +71.2% | −26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 15 of 21 | +54.4% | −5.5% | +79.8% | −27.8% | +35.5% | +107% | +54.8% | +4.5% | +38.2% | +30.1% | +30.0% | +44.9% | +55.6% | +54.9% | −8.8% | −31.1% | +90.1% | −41.3% | +93.3% | −25.9% | +61.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 18 of 29 | +59.6% | +1.1% | +68.0% | −37.5% | +83.6% | +43.3% | +89.9% | −34.9% | +59.8% | +75.7% | −23.5% | +43.7% | +58.6% | +10.2% | −21.9% | +3.0% | +40.4% | −42.1% | −2.6% | +3.8% | +5.4% | −23.8% | +72.3% | −35.0% | +5.0% | −39.7% | +197% | +41.7% | +67.9% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 14 of 25 | −14.1% | −24.5% | +33.9% | −8.2% | +108% | +34.3% | +47.7% | −21.1% | +64.1% | +30.2% | −3.3% | +22.9% | +16.9% | −8.7% | −21.9% | +12.0% | +159% | −61.7% | +17.3% | +36.9% | +21.8% | −29.9% | +373% | −33.8% | −60.6% | — | — | — | — |
| TEL TE Connectivity plc | 10 of 18 | +61.6% | +3.5% | +24.6% | −27.7% | +35.1% | +28.9% | +29.4% | −18.9% | +39.9% | +9.8% | +4.2% | +16.9% | +51.6% | +23.4% | −11.1% | +47.5% | +57.0% | −55.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SITM SiTime Corporation | 4 of 6 | +64.6% | +75.7% | +20.1% | −65.3% | +161% | +339% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | 14 of 23 | −3.0% | −33.1% | +19.9% | −67.1% | +200% | +46.6% | +76.8% | −6.8% | −25.5% | −33.3% | +16.7% | +32.9% | +72.9% | −0.6% | +2.6% | −4.1% | +85.1% | −39.6% | +38.6% | +20.1% | −19.2% | +104% | +97.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 18 of 29 | +14.6% | −34.9% | +30.9% | −18.0% | +27.5% | +33.7% | +48.1% | −16.7% | +39.5% | +41.6% | +6.3% | +4.0% | +42.4% | −7.1% | +10.3% | +24.6% | +57.8% | −34.8% | −0.7% | +4.4% | +22.6% | −19.9% | +36.8% | −5.1% | +76.5% | −27.9% | +85.0% | +23.6% | −11.6% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −25.5% | −18.9% | +26.5% | −40.0% | +2.7% | +28.4% | +84.1% | −28.3% | +28.7% | −1.2% | +6.7% | +156% | +40.6% | +25.2% | −43.4% | +102% | +156% | −34.8% | +20.2% | +38.9% | −45.9% | +8.4% | +0.9% | −60.5% | −41.1% | +29.1% | +139% | +123% | +104% |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | 16 of 29 | −20.0% | −23.4% | +5.8% | −30.7% | +55.8% | +25.1% | +74.7% | +12.5% | +11.7% | +11.7% | −16.7% | +17.0% | +35.8% | −18.5% | −21.1% | +32.2% | +237% | −79.8% | +27.2% | +14.2% | +106% | +19.2% | +196% | +44.7% | −35.8% | −27.8% | +330% | −48.8% | +35.0% |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | 7 of 14 | +25.8% | −32.6% | −3.7% | −43.5% | +26.6% | +37.5% | +55.9% | −27.1% | +57.6% | −20.1% | +19.3% | +22.7% | +59.4% | +77.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 2 of 4 | −18.6% | −29.2% | +12.4% | −17.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| POWI Power Integrations, Inc. | 15 of 28 | −41.3% | −24.0% | +15.6% | −22.1% | +14.1% | +66.7% | +63.7% | −16.3% | +9.3% | +40.8% | −5.1% | −6.6% | +67.2% | +1.9% | −17.0% | +11.1% | +83.7% | −42.1% | +46.6% | −1.5% | +20.4% | −40.9% | +96.8% | −25.6% | +98.6% | −76.0% | +283% | +171% | — |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 4 of 5 | +20.7% | −27.8% | +0.8% | −17.0% | +35.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How STM has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were STM's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents STM's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1994, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of STM's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: STM fell 66.6% from July 2023 to April 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 12.3%.
- The slowest recovery came after STM fell 94.3% from March 2000 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until September 2021, 12 years later.
Green means STM fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | STM fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −94.3% | −43.7% | Mar 2000 | Mar 2009 | 9 years | Sep 2021 | 12.5 years |
| No named crash | −66.6% | +12.3% | Jul 2023 | Apr 2025 | 21 months | Apr 2026 | 12 months |
| No named crash | −61.2% | +8.9% | Aug 1997 | Oct 1998 | 14 months | Jan 1999 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −49.1% | +9.2% | Aug 1995 | Dec 1995 | 4 months | Oct 1996 | 10 months |
| 2022 bear market | −43.0% | −17.8% | Nov 2021 | Jul 2022 | 8 months | Mar 2023 | 8 months |
How did STM do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far STM, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- STM fell further than the S&P 500 in nine of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when STM fell 83.5% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, ADI held up best, falling less than STM in all ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than STM.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STM This pageSTMicroelectronics N.V. | — | −3.2% | −40.6% | −49.6% | −31.0% | −9.1% | −31.6% | −36.9% | −3.2% | −77.2% | −83.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 6 of 10 | −2.9% | −48.4% | −37.9% | −24.4% | −7.5% | −22.1% | −17.7% | −2.7% | −64.1% | −90.0% |
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 7 of 9 | −2.0% | −51.0% | −17.1% | −36.2% | −4.4% | −16.6% | −24.9% | 0.0% | −63.0% | — |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 10 of 10 | −2.6% | −22.6% | −33.6% | −18.1% | −7.2% | −22.7% | −18.6% | −1.2% | −55.0% | −82.0% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 7 of 10 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −4.8% | −43.9% | −48.1% | −37.0% | −41.5% | −22.4% | — | — | — | — |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 8 of 10 | −2.6% | −21.7% | −29.8% | −19.5% | −9.3% | −18.4% | −21.6% | −1.3% | −61.4% | −85.4% |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −2.4% | −22.2% | −42.4% | −21.6% | −20.8% | −16.4% | −46.6% | −2.0% | −84.8% | −88.5% |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −42.9% | −34.8% | −22.7% | −10.1% | −32.0% | −25.2% | −1.9% | −60.6% | — |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 3 of 7 | −4.2% | −38.8% | −52.0% | −27.4% | −4.0% | −35.5% | −39.8% | — | — | — |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −5.1% | −39.7% | −27.9% | −21.4% | −9.8% | −18.1% | −32.0% | −5.4% | −72.3% | — |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −3.6% | −54.2% | −43.6% | −26.4% | −9.7% | −18.8% | −24.5% | −1.6% | −61.7% | −82.0% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 4 of 9 | −6.4% | −34.0% | −59.6% | −23.7% | −12.2% | −39.2% | −28.5% | 0.0% | −80.0% | — |
| TEL TE Connectivity plc | 6 of 9 | −4.3% | −33.3% | −42.9% | −23.2% | −6.8% | −22.7% | −24.7% | −3.5% | −81.1% | — |
| SITM SiTime Corporation | 1 of 3 | −6.1% | −71.0% | −46.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | 6 of 9 | −6.7% | −68.3% | −40.4% | −28.7% | −5.1% | −34.1% | −13.9% | −1.1% | −64.4% | — |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 8 of 10 | −3.8% | −35.3% | −49.0% | −25.9% | −14.4% | −18.6% | −12.7% | −0.4% | −55.2% | −58.7% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −3.0% | −50.0% | −43.0% | −32.3% | −5.3% | −38.6% | −37.2% | −3.4% | −66.0% | −95.7% |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | 5 of 10 | −4.0% | −45.5% | −33.1% | −18.6% | −5.0% | −29.6% | −34.3% | −3.4% | −90.1% | −86.5% |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | 1 of 6 | −5.7% | −55.1% | −63.2% | −33.4% | −6.0% | −35.7% | — | — | — | — |
| GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 0 of 2 | −5.1% | −50.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| POWI Power Integrations, Inc. | 8 of 10 | −3.3% | −35.7% | −21.7% | −26.1% | −7.5% | −20.9% | −24.3% | 0.0% | −57.5% | −84.3% |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −5.9% | −44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does STM move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares STM with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, STM captured 122% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 104% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.72. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- UMC took just 52% of the S&P 500's losses, against 104% for STM, while still keeping 133% of its gains.
- Six of the 19 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than STM's 1.17, led by UMC, TSM and AMAT.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than STM's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STM This pageSTMicroelectronics N.V. | 122% | 104% | 1.17 | 1.72 |
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 133% | 52% | 2.56 | 1.33 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 152% | 97% | 1.58 | 1.51 |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 156% | 107% | 1.46 | 1.31 |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 170% | 132% | 1.29 | 1.44 |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 117% | 92% | 1.26 | 1.20 |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 113% | 108% | 1.04 | 1.18 |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 148% | 157% | 0.94 | 1.93 |
| TEL TE Connectivity plc | 109% | 120% | 0.91 | 1.26 |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | 128% | 146% | 0.88 | 1.53 |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 113% | 130% | 0.87 | 1.18 |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 161% | 185% | 0.87 | 1.95 |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 127% | 170% | 0.75 | 1.72 |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 118% | 160% | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 115% | 157% | 0.73 | 1.63 |
| POWI Power Integrations, Inc. | 89% | 133% | 0.67 | 1.28 |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | 117% | 188% | 0.62 | 1.64 |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 88% | 149% | 0.59 | 1.31 |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | 106% | 219% | 0.48 | 1.80 |
What diversifies STM?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with STM's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing STM with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in STM into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+5.0% for STM alone, +13.3% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of STM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.34 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in nine of the 14 calendar years in which STM lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which STM lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% STM and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. (this page) | 1.00 | +11.6% | 0.28 | −49.6% | −26.8% | −35.7% | −6.7% | −2.5% | −40.6% | −52.3% | −21.1% | −6.1% | −28.1% | −38.3% | −26.0% | −15.2% | −12.7% | 51.7% | +5.0% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.30 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.0% | +9.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.34 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.3% | +10.9% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.26 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.2% | +8.9% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.23 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +7.1% | −3.0% | −0.3% | +12.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.1% | +8.3% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.44 | +62.9% | 0.99 | +18.8% | −5.6% | −4.8% | +4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.2% | +7.9% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.43 | +140% | 0.97 | +5.7% | −5.2% | −15.3% | −15.6% | −6.3% | −9.8% | −36.8% | +20.9% | +4.6% | +30.2% | −13.6% | −9.2% | −11.8% | +23.9% | 43.1% | +9.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.01 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +17.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 41.5% | +9.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.06 | +177% | 0.93 | +5.6% | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +40.1% | +33.8% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | — | 42.0% | +10.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. (this page) | 1.00 | +11.6% | 0.28 | −49.6% | −26.8% | −35.7% | −6.7% | −2.5% | −40.6% | −52.3% | −21.1% | −6.1% | −28.1% | −38.3% | −26.0% | −15.2% | −12.7% | 51.7% | +5.0% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.04 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −9.8% | +18.7% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | +29.1% | 41.9% | +13.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.31 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +12.9% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −25.2% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | — | 46.4% | +24.6% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.36 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −10.4% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +20.1% | +40.0% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | — | 45.4% | +20.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.14 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | +64.9% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | +96.3% | 41.0% | +13.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.13 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.7% | +15.3% |
Common questions
What was STM's worst drawdown?
STM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1994 was 94.3%, from March 2000 to March 2009. It took about 12 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were STM's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, STM's best year was 1999, when it returned 288%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -52.3%.
Is there a better investment than STM?
Among STM's popular alternatives, ADI, TSM and ASML earned more than STM with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 2.2% a year at 47.7%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSFT (software) and ASX (semiconductors) earned more than STM with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 2.2% a year at 47.7%.
Is STM more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. STM's volatility over the past 5 years was 47.7%, 2.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, STM's return lands within 47.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is STM's Sharpe ratio?
STM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.28, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so STM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is STM with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, STM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.59 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against STM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a STM holding.
What are the best alternatives to STM?
Of the 22 popular alternatives we compared, nine outperformed STM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ASML, UMC and ADI.
Did STM outperform the S&P 500?
STM finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +5.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did STM do in stock market crashes?
STM fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in nine. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when STM fell 83.5% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies STM?
These had a low correlation with STM over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.30), DXJ (correlation 0.34) and EMLP (correlation 0.26); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.04), CLS (correlation 0.31) and FIX (correlation 0.36). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than STM's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of STM's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to STM
ASMLASML Holding
UMCUnited Microelectronics
ADIAnalog Devices
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
TXNTexas Instruments
NXPINXP Semiconductors
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems
AMATApplied Materials
TELTE Connectivity
MCHPMicrochip Technology