Relative Intelligence · Metals & Mining

How Nucor (NUE) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on NUE alone. It places NUE (Nucor Corporation) against 16 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where NUE stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: NUE's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, NUE rose 29.9% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its metals & mining peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from TX (Ternium, up 42.9%) to MT (ArcelorMittal, up 1.7%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?NUE's 13.6% gain over the past 3 months far outran its industry: the materials sector ETF XLB (State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) rose 2.9%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its metals & mining peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: CLF (Cleveland-Cliffs) rose 52.0%, while MT (ArcelorMittal) fell 3.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsNUE has run far ahead of the market, rising 93.7% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (92.9% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termNUE turned $10,000 into $66,900 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. NUE's 10-year return of 569% puts it ahead of 88% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, NUE has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, NUE fell 40.8%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than STLD (Steel Dynamics, 30.6%) but less than MT (ArcelorMittal, 46.1%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationNUE is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.65 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.66 with the total US market, more closely than 96% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, NUE's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.65: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.5 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.8 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum) and CAT (Caterpillar) earned more than NUE with less volatility over the past 5 years. RS returned 24.8% a year at 28.1% volatility, against 21.7% a year at 37.4%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- ESLT (Elbit Systems, aerospace & defense) and CW (Curtiss-Wright, aerospace & defense) earned more than NUE with less volatility over the past 5 years. ESLT returned 39.8% a year at 34.6% volatility, against 21.7% a year at 37.4%.
- Whole market
- 86 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NUE with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY (Eli Lilly and Company), XOM (Exxonmobil) and ABBV (AbbVie).
How much would $10,000 in NUE have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in NUE over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of NUE over the same span and NUE's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in NUE at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $361,333 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of NUE, and ESLT finished highest, at $1,652,837.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 166 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NUE; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ESLT$2M+16,428% total · +19.3% a year
- RS$621,583+6,116% total · +15.3% a year
- CAT$615,591+6,056% total · +15.3% a year
- STLD$598,980+5,890% total · +15.2% a year
- BHP$430,670+4,207% total · +13.9% a year
- NUE$361,333+3,513% total · +13.2% a year
- CRS$297,321+2,873% total · +12.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- CLF$29,999+200% total · +3.9% a year
- MT$10,522+5.2% total · +0.2% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 482 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NUE; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CRS$125,806+1,158% total · +65.9% a year
- ESLT$49,131+391% total · +37.5% a year
- CAT$46,130+361% total · +35.8% a year
- CW$43,818+338% total · +34.4% a year
- STLD$40,782+308% total · +32.5% a year
- URI$29,622+196% total · +24.3% a year
- RS$29,255+193% total · +23.9% a year
- NUE$25,527+155% total · +20.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- TX$18,420+84.2% total · +13.0% a year
NUE at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- NUE's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 68.3%, from May to November 2008. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, NUE's best was 2021, when it returned 118%, and its worst was 2024, when it lost 32.0%. It lost money in 12 of those years.
- NUE is 4.6% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $59B
- Industry
- Steel
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +93.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +92.9%+24.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +167%+21.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +569%+20.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +118%2021
- Worst calendar year
- −32.0%2024
- Losing years
- 12 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 37.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.72return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −68.3%May 2008 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −4.6%below the peak
NUE against the whole market
Where NUE ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does NUE rank among all stocks?
This section ranks NUE on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how NUE stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- NUE's 1-year return ranks in the top 6% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | NUE | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +93.7% | 202 of 3,287 | top 6% |
| 3-year return | +92.9% | 982 of 3,017 | top 33% |
| 5-year return | +167% | 391 of 2,893 | top 14% |
| 10-year return | +569% | 257 of 2,202 | top 12% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 37.4% | 1,296 of 2,893 | top 45% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.72 | 431 of 2,893 | top 15% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −57.2% | 765 of 2,187 | top 35% |
What has beaten NUE on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). NUE sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than NUE with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 83 stocks and three ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than NUE over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 2% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half NUE's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 34% less than NUE's 37.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.72 for NUE. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than NUE (33.4% against 37.4%).
- Among NUE's popular alternatives, CAT and RS are in the region. CAT earned 31.1% a year against 21.7% a year for NUE, at 31.9% volatility, 15% less than NUE's 37.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to NUE; faint dots are 73 more of the 86 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than NUE?
Investments that beat NUE over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among NUE's popular alternatives, RS and CAT earned more than NUE with less volatility over the past 5 years. RS returned 24.8% a year at 28.1% volatility, against 21.7% a year at 37.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ESLT (aerospace & defense) and CW (aerospace & defense) earned more than NUE with less volatility over the past 5 years. ESLT returned 39.8% a year at 34.6% volatility, against 21.7% a year at 37.4%.
- Across the whole market, 86 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NUE with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, XOM and ABBV.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat NUE over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks NUE's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than NUE follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than NUE's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× NUE's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than NUE's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with NUE?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +21.7% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | +569% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.65 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against NUE. 3 of 15 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.81 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.48 | — | ||
STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Higher return, similar volatility | +32.2% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | +1,018% | 0.89 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Metals & Mining and the categories next to it (Gold Mining, Aerospace & Defense, Silver, Gold), plus NUE's specific themes. 10 of 80 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.19 | — | |
CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.39 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +510% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.38 | — | ||
TFPMTriple Flag Precious Metals Corp. · Metals & Mining | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +29.3% | 37.7% | 0.87 | −36.2% | — | -0.09 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 202 of 3,538 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.08 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.15 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.39 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.37 | 0.48% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.07 | — | ||
QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.39 | 0.40% | |
What these numbers mean for NUE
- Annual return
- NUE returned 21.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $26,700. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- NUE's volatility over the past 5 years was 37.4%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NUE's return lands within 37.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- NUE's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.72, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NUE earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- NUE's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 57.2%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 57.2% fall takes a 134% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, NUE's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.65 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NUE instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NUE holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 86 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than NUE with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with NUE | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.08 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.15 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.36 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.39 | — | |
| 5 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.16 | — |
| 6 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.29 | — | |
| 7 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.25 | — |
| 8 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Same or nearby category | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.19 | — |
| 9 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.38 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | 0.41 | — | |
| 11 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.37 | 0.48% |
| 12 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Popular alternative | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.81 | — |
| 13 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.23 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.08 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.28 | — | |
| 16 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.26 | — |
| 17 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.23 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.40 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.58 | — | |
| 20 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.40 | — |
| 21 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.46 | — |
| 22 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.38 | — |
| 23 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.33 | — |
| 24 | ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc. · Auto Parts | Whole market | +27.3% | 29.9% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +367% | 0.38 | — |
| 25 | Popular alternative | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.48 | — | |
| 26 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | 0.49 | — |
| 27 | FSSFederal Signal Corporation · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +23.3% | 31.7% | 0.82 | −33.0% | +882% | 0.42 | — |
| 28 | ESEESCO Technologies Inc. · Electronic Instruments | Whole market | +24.2% | 31.1% | 0.85 | −46.0% | +473% | 0.33 | — |
| 29 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Same or nearby category | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.39 | — |
| 30 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.39 | 0.40% |
| 31 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.46 | — | |
| 32 | IGICInternational General Insurance Holdings Ltd. · Insurance - Diversified | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.9% | 1.03 | −50.6% | — | 0.04 | — |
| 33 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.31 | — | |
| 34 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.34 | 0.59% |
| 35 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.26 | — | |
| 36 | Same or nearby category | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.45 | — | |
| 37 | FBIZFirst Business Financial Services, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +23.1% | 29.4% | 0.85 | −50.2% | +307% | 0.40 | — |
| 38 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.25 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.39 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | 0.28 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.40 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.41 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.48 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.51 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.49 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +26.5% | 32.5% | 0.89 | −77.5% | +433% | 0.40 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.34 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | 0.18 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.35 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +339% | 0.20 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | 0.47 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.51 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | 0.24 | — | |
| 54 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.29 | — |
| 55 | Whole market | +25.3% | 34.4% | 0.83 | −64.1% | +390% | 0.39 | — | |
| 56 | NWGNatWest Group plc · Banks | Whole market | +27.7% | 34.1% | 0.89 | −67.4% | +495% | 0.30 | — |
| 57 | TSTenaris S.A. · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +24.3% | 33.3% | 0.82 | −75.1% | +181% | 0.50 | — |
| 58 | Same or nearby category | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.38 | — | |
| 59 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.49 | — |
| 60 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | 0.13 | — |
| 61 | UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corporation · Biotechnology | Whole market | +23.6% | 35.1% | 0.78 | −55.6% | +390% | -0.14 | — |
| 62 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.16 | — |
| 63 | MLIMueller Industries, Inc. · Metal Fabrication | Whole market | +38.9% | 33.4% | 1.16 | −53.0% | +800% | 0.56 | — |
| 64 | WESWestern Midstream Partners, LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +23.5% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | +128% | 0.47 | — |
| 65 | WFWoori Financial Group Inc. · Banks | Whole market | +26.3% | 31.6% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +282% | 0.41 | — |
| 66 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.50 | — |
| 67 | APGAPi Group Corporation · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +23.0% | 31.9% | 0.81 | −49.6% | — | 0.57 | — |
| 68 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | 0.64 | — |
| 69 | TKOTKO Group Holdings, Inc. · Entertainment | Whole market | +26.3% | 32.7% | 0.88 | −69.1% | +941% | 0.27 | — |
| 70 | RRyder System, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +25.1% | 32.6% | 0.85 | −72.3% | +407% | 0.50 | — |
| 71 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | — | -0.01 | — |
| 72 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.47 | — |
| 73 | ACAArcosa, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +23.1% | 34.0% | 0.78 | −36.8% | — | 0.57 | — |
| 74 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Same or nearby category | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.35 | — |
| 75 | GVAGranite Construction Incorporated · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +23.8% | 30.6% | 0.85 | −84.7% | +186% | 0.31 | — |
| 76 | WWDWoodward, Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Same or nearby category | +23.8% | 32.3% | 0.82 | −60.6% | +488% | 0.36 | — |
| 77 | WTWisdomTree, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +31.4% | 32.8% | 1.00 | −84.0% | +174% | 0.42 | — |
| 78 | ARLPAlliance Resource Partners, L.P. · Coal | Whole market | +29.4% | 31.6% | 0.98 | −85.3% | +173% | 0.27 | — |
| 79 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.31 | — |
| 80 | DCODucommun Incorporated · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +27.5% | 34.5% | 0.88 | −70.8% | +706% | 0.48 | — |
| 81 | EZPWEZCORP, Inc. · Financial - Credit Services | Whole market | +33.2% | 35.4% | 0.99 | −76.6% | +202% | 0.34 | — |
| 82 | NRPNatural Resource Partners L.P. · Coal | Whole market | +37.4% | 33.9% | 1.11 | −78.8% | +632% | 0.16 | — |
| 83 | ESQEsquire Financial Holdings, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.7% | 31.7% | 1.03 | −56.5% | — | 0.21 | — |
| 84 | GLPGlobal Partners LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +25.3% | 35.5% | 0.82 | −62.5% | +662% | 0.48 | — |
| 85 | AMALAmalgamated Financial Corp. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +24.7% | 33.4% | 0.83 | −62.9% | — | 0.33 | — |
| 86 | NBNNortheast Bank · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +28.8% | 33.3% | 0.93 | −70.2% | +1,064% | 0.39 | — |
NUE against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against NUE, compared period by period and year by year.
How do NUE's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at NUE, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only CAT and RS were both more rewarding and calmer than NUE over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, NUE returned 21.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (37.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than NUE with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | +63.9% | 46.5% |
| STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | +32.2% | 38.0% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | +31.1% | 31.9% |
| RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | +24.8% | 28.1% |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | +24.3% | 39.1% |
| NUE This pageNucor Corporation | +21.8% | 37.4% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | +16.6% | 31.4% |
| CMC Commercial Metals Company | +16.4% | 35.8% |
| MT ArcelorMittal S.A. | +15.6% | 39.6% |
| GGB Gerdau S.A. | +14.1% | 38.6% |
| TX Ternium S.A. | +13.7% | 34.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | +8.0% | 26.6% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | +7.4% | 35.0% |
| PKX POSCO Holdings Inc. | 0.0% | 41.0% |
| CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | −8.8% | 60.2% |
| SID Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | −17.7% | 54.5% |
Has NUE consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares NUE with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than NUE helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 16 popular alternatives outperformed NUE in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was URI.
- CAT and RS earned more for the risk they took than NUE (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- CAT outperformed NUE over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so NUE has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than NUE over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| NUE Nucor Corporation (this page) | — | +8.1% | +13.6% | +29.9% | +55.6% | +93.7% | +92.9% | +167% | +569% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | — | $59B | — |
| URI Rental & Leasing ServicesUnited Rentals, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | +1.4% | +3.3% | +29.0% | +24.3% | +5.2% | +164% | +196% | +1,270% | 39.1% | 0.75 | −63.3% | — | $65B | — |
| CRS SteelCarpenter Technology Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | −7.5% | −32.8% | −17.5% | +10.3% | +54.5% | +521% | +1,082% | +1,021% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | — | $18B | — |
| STLD SteelSteel Dynamics, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | +6.5% | +6.3% | +17.3% | +39.9% | +68.9% | +157% | +304% | +1,018% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | — | $35B | — |
| CAT Agricultural - MachineryCaterpillar Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −11.2% | −15.9% | −8.8% | +22.2% | +37.7% | +203% | +288% | +936% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | — | $333B | — |
| RS SteelReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 0/5 short2/3 long | +8.5% | +9.2% | +25.2% | +42.5% | +52.1% | +77.7% | +203% | +626% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | — | $21B | — |
| TX SteelTernium S.A. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +5.0% | +34.1% | +42.9% | +57.0% | +73.7% | +101% | +89.6% | +393% | 34.8% | 0.54 | −74.9% | — | $12B | — |
| MT SteelArcelorMittal S.A. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −12.9% | −3.9% | +1.7% | +34.8% | +65.5% | +207% | +107% | +255% | 39.6% | 0.56 | −81.1% | — | $48B | — |
| CLF SteelCleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +13.1% | +52.0% | +40.3% | +0.4% | −15.6% | −6.4% | −37.1% | +137% | 60.2% | 0.14 | −82.4% | — | $7.8B | — |
| WS SteelWorthington Steel, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +23.7% | +17.6% | +16.6% | +18.9% | +34.0% | — | — | — | — | — | −51.0% | — | $2.1B | — |
| SID SteelCompanhia Siderúrgica Nacional | 1/5 short0/3 long | −0.9% | +14.9% | −15.9% | −28.0% | −29.7% | −36.6% | −62.3% | −34.8% | 54.5% | -0.09 | −86.5% | — | $1.5B | — |
| BHP Industrial MaterialsBHP Group Limited | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.9% | +3.9% | +5.1% | +38.1% | +50.2% | +71.0% | +115% | +398% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | — | $208B | — |
| CMC SteelCommercial Metals Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.0% | −1.3% | −4.0% | −9.1% | +11.6% | +66.8% | +113% | +367% | 35.8% | 0.60 | −53.8% | — | $7.2B | — |
| VALE Industrial MaterialsVale S.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.0% | −5.5% | −24.9% | +1.0% | +23.6% | +37.8% | +42.6% | +334% | 35.0% | 0.38 | −57.6% | — | $55B | — |
| GGB SteelGerdau S.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +4.8% | +12.9% | +24.5% | +41.6% | +59.3% | +65.3% | +93.4% | +225% | 38.6% | 0.54 | −67.4% | — | $10B | — |
| VMC Construction MaterialsVulcan Materials Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | +6.4% | −6.5% | −10.8% | −10.0% | −10.7% | +32.9% | +46.8% | +159% | 26.6% | 0.42 | −49.2% | — | $34B | — |
| PKX SteelPOSCO Holdings Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.2% | +11.6% | −15.3% | +6.8% | +9.4% | −27.2% | −0.2% | +49.2% | 41.0% | 0.20 | −69.6% | — | $17B | — |
How did NUE do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where NUE ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with NUE and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- NUE finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, RS came out ahead of NUE most often, in 19 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, NUE finished in the top quarter in five of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 17.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of NUE; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places NUE among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of NUE | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUE This pageNucor Corporation | — | +42.0% | −31.9% | +33.8% | +17.4% | +118% | −1.8% | +11.9% | −16.4% | +9.6% | +52.2% | −14.9% | −5.4% | +27.6% | +13.1% | −6.3% | −2.8% | +4.2% | −19.4% | +12.8% | +70.5% | +30.9% | +89.1% | +37.7% | −20.6% | +35.7% | −26.6% | +28.2% | −9.4% | −4.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 29 | 7 of 17 | 13 of 17 | 7 of 16 | 9 of 16 | 1 of 16 | 13 of 16 | 12 of 16 | 8 of 16 | 12 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 5 of 16 | 5 of 16 | 5 of 16 | 7 of 16 | 5 of 16 | 12 of 16 | 15 of 16 | 2 of 16 | 14 of 16 | 2 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 4 of 15 | 14 of 15 | 12 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 9 of 14 | 7 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 8 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 15 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | 15 of 28 | +15.9% | +24.0% | +63.6% | +7.0% | +43.3% | +39.1% | +62.6% | −40.4% | +62.8% | +45.6% | −28.9% | +30.9% | +71.3% | +54.0% | +29.9% | +132% | +7.5% | −50.3% | −27.8% | +8.7% | +23.8% | −1.9% | +79.0% | −52.6% | +68.9% | −21.5% | −48.3% | +71.5% | — |
| CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 14 of 29 | +86.2% | +142% | +94.5% | +29.5% | +2.7% | −39.4% | +42.1% | −29.2% | +43.4% | +22.0% | −37.4% | −19.8% | +22.1% | +1.7% | +30.0% | +52.6% | +35.9% | −72.1% | +48.0% | +46.5% | +21.7% | +99.5% | +142% | −50.7% | −18.9% | +34.3% | −15.0% | −27.2% | +35.3% |
| STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 17 of 29 | +50.7% | −2.0% | +22.8% | +60.1% | +71.4% | +12.4% | +16.8% | −29.0% | +23.3% | +103% | −6.8% | +3.5% | +46.2% | +7.8% | −26.1% | +5.2% | +62.4% | −61.8% | +86.0% | +86.0% | −5.2% | +66.0% | +90.5% | +3.8% | +5.8% | −31.1% | +35.7% | −26.6% | −16.3% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 16 of 29 | +60.3% | +24.7% | +25.9% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +27.0% | +19.5% | −17.6% | +75.0% | +42.1% | −23.0% | +3.5% | +3.4% | +1.6% | −1.5% | +68.5% | +33.2% | −36.8% | +20.5% | +7.8% | +20.7% | +19.7% | +86.1% | −9.8% | +13.7% | +4.1% | +4.7% | −3.0% | +31.2% |
| RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 19 of 29 | +9.1% | −2.3% | +40.3% | +27.1% | +37.8% | +2.4% | +72.2% | −15.1% | +10.5% | +40.5% | −2.9% | −17.5% | +24.3% | +29.5% | −3.7% | +19.3% | +119% | −62.8% | +38.6% | +29.6% | +58.1% | +18.1% | +61.4% | −19.9% | +6.9% | +6.6% | +28.6% | −6.7% | +28.2% |
| TX Ternium S.A. | 12 of 19 | +43.5% | −25.9% | +49.9% | −24.8% | +61.0% | +44.4% | −14.8% | −11.8% | +36.4% | +104% | −26.4% | −42.2% | +36.7% | +32.2% | −55.5% | +21.5% | +314% | −78.4% | +38.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MT ArcelorMittal S.A. | 11 of 28 | +100% | −16.9% | +10.2% | −16.6% | +40.3% | +30.6% | −14.2% | −35.8% | +47.5% | +73.1% | −61.2% | −37.6% | +3.8% | −0.5% | −51.2% | −15.3% | +89.3% | −67.5% | +85.7% | +62.0% | −31.3% | +336% | +303% | +25.8% | −22.2% | −85.9% | +108% | −63.9% | — |
| CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 12 of 29 | +41.3% | −54.0% | +26.8% | −26.0% | +49.5% | +77.3% | +12.8% | +6.6% | −14.2% | +431% | −77.8% | −71.7% | −30.4% | −35.3% | −19.2% | +70.8% | +81.5% | −48.8% | +110% | +10.7% | +71.9% | +104% | +157% | +8.8% | −13.3% | −26.3% | −19.3% | −9.3% | +4.3% |
| WS Worthington Steel, Inc. | 1 of 2 | +11.2% | +15.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SID Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | 14 of 29 | +11.1% | −59.6% | +70.3% | −29.4% | −22.3% | +72.4% | +68.7% | −3.0% | −24.2% | +231% | −49.2% | −65.5% | +18.1% | −24.0% | −48.3% | +7.8% | +168% | −55.9% | +211% | +57.6% | +27.7% | +53.8% | +344% | +182% | −5.4% | −10.1% | +70.7% | +6.6% | +3,142% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 15 of 29 | +28.9% | −24.6% | +16.4% | +29.4% | +2.0% | +25.3% | +24.6% | +10.5% | +33.8% | +41.9% | −38.1% | −27.9% | −9.8% | +14.9% | −22.0% | +24.5% | +85.2% | −37.4% | +79.4% | +21.2% | +42.0% | +34.3% | +62.6% | +50.4% | +8.7% | −16.6% | +91.5% | −18.9% | −32.0% |
| CMC Commercial Metals Company | 14 of 29 | +41.5% | +0.4% | +5.0% | +35.1% | +79.8% | −5.4% | +42.8% | −23.2% | −0.9% | +64.0% | −13.2% | −17.8% | +41.0% | +11.3% | −14.5% | +10.3% | +36.5% | −59.0% | +15.5% | +38.6% | +50.0% | +67.7% | +89.9% | −5.0% | +65.2% | −33.1% | +24.9% | −10.4% | +6.6% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 11 of 23 | +66.3% | −38.8% | +1.6% | +32.5% | −1.7% | +32.0% | +2.7% | +12.3% | +62.2% | +134% | −57.8% | −44.1% | −23.2% | +3.3% | −34.0% | +21.2% | +145% | −61.8% | +123% | +47.5% | +46.9% | +50.6% | +108% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GGB Gerdau S.A. | 12 of 26 | +32.7% | −25.9% | −2.1% | +28.4% | +18.2% | −3.1% | +32.8% | +3.2% | +18.5% | +164% | −65.2% | −53.8% | −11.7% | +17.0% | −43.0% | −15.8% | +160% | −52.6% | +86.5% | +54.8% | +47.9% | +83.5% | +213% | −3.0% | +17.4% | −31.3% | — | — | — |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 11 of 29 | +11.7% | +14.1% | +30.8% | −14.9% | +41.1% | +4.1% | +47.1% | −22.3% | +3.2% | +32.7% | +45.1% | +11.0% | +14.2% | +32.5% | −9.5% | −13.7% | −21.7% | −9.1% | −10.3% | +35.1% | +26.4% | +17.4% | +30.2% | −20.0% | +2.1% | +22.2% | −7.3% | +31.2% | +71.8% |
| PKX POSCO Holdings Inc. | 11 of 29 | +27.3% | −53.3% | +77.9% | −2.2% | −1.4% | +27.8% | −4.1% | −28.6% | +54.2% | +53.8% | −42.1% | −16.4% | −2.6% | +2.3% | −21.8% | −16.1% | +76.1% | −48.9% | +85.4% | +68.4% | +16.0% | +37.3% | +43.1% | +10.4% | +54.0% | −54.2% | +110% | −1.7% | −13.1% |
Risk and diversification
How NUE has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were NUE's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents NUE's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of NUE's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: NUE fell 56.0% from June 1994 to September 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 247%.
- The slowest recovery came after NUE fell 68.3% from May to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until November 2016, eight years later.
Green means NUE fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | NUE fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −68.3% | −46.5% | May 2008 | Nov 2008 | 6 months | Nov 2016 | 8 years |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −57.2% | −15.7% | Jan 2018 | Mar 2020 | 2.2 years | Mar 2021 | 12 months |
| Dot-com bust | −56.0% | +247% | Jun 1994 | Sep 2000 | 6.3 years | May 2002 | 20 months |
| No named crash | −47.8% | −1.3% | Apr 2024 | Apr 2025 | 12 months | Apr 2026 | 12 months |
| Dot-com bust | −47.3% | −16.9% | Jun 2002 | Feb 2003 | 8 months | May 2004 | 15 months |
How did NUE do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far NUE, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- NUE fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when NUE fell 40.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, RS held up best, falling less than NUE in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than NUE.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUE This pageNucor Corporation | — | −10.3% | −40.8% | −41.5% | −23.5% | −6.0% | −24.3% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −68.3% | −44.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −14.5% | −35.4% | −55.3% | −43.3% | −6.7% | −45.7% | −50.5% | −3.6% | −91.2% | −77.3% |
| CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 2 of 10 | −8.7% | −41.9% | −66.2% | −43.6% | −3.8% | −36.5% | −28.1% | 0.0% | −84.7% | −70.2% |
| STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −11.7% | −30.6% | −47.8% | −37.1% | −3.6% | −25.6% | −43.0% | −0.7% | −87.1% | −41.6% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 4 of 10 | −9.7% | −30.1% | −33.1% | −28.5% | −7.3% | −26.0% | −33.2% | −2.2% | −73.3% | −42.5% |
| RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 7 of 10 | −3.8% | −22.3% | −38.7% | −19.3% | −4.8% | −16.3% | −36.3% | −2.4% | −83.8% | −42.0% |
| TX Ternium S.A. | 3 of 9 | −7.6% | −43.9% | −52.2% | −17.4% | −2.7% | −35.7% | −34.2% | 0.0% | −89.7% | — |
| MT ArcelorMittal S.A. | 1 of 10 | −8.8% | −46.1% | −58.7% | −38.4% | −7.1% | −68.8% | −53.8% | −2.0% | −85.1% | −94.9% |
| CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 1 of 10 | −10.0% | −60.5% | −59.6% | −41.3% | −2.6% | −71.3% | −51.4% | 0.0% | −89.8% | −46.5% |
| SID Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | 1 of 10 | −13.3% | −58.7% | −65.1% | −21.7% | −7.4% | −53.8% | −33.9% | −1.0% | −84.4% | −60.9% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 5 of 10 | −2.2% | −31.8% | −38.1% | −12.8% | −6.4% | −49.4% | −30.7% | 0.0% | −73.7% | −32.6% |
| CMC Commercial Metals Company | 4 of 10 | −11.4% | −28.7% | −45.2% | −26.2% | −4.7% | −22.6% | −41.0% | 0.0% | −83.8% | −29.5% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 3 of 9 | −3.1% | −41.4% | −45.5% | −20.9% | −5.3% | −61.1% | −33.4% | −0.8% | −79.5% | — |
| GGB Gerdau S.A. | 3 of 10 | −9.3% | −36.4% | −63.4% | −20.3% | −6.8% | −55.0% | −29.2% | −2.2% | −83.3% | −66.6% |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 5 of 10 | −7.2% | −32.5% | −43.4% | −27.1% | −7.3% | −22.8% | −26.4% | −1.3% | −61.0% | −39.7% |
| PKX POSCO Holdings Inc. | 3 of 10 | −3.7% | −41.3% | −41.4% | −21.7% | −9.0% | −21.2% | −35.5% | 0.0% | −77.2% | −51.5% |
How closely does NUE move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares NUE with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Eight of the 15 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than NUE's 0.87, led by RS, CAT and STLD.
- CAT took just 122% of the S&P 500's losses, against 176% for NUE, while still keeping 148% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, NUE captured 154% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 176% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.65. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than NUE's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUE This pageNucor Corporation | 154% | 176% | 0.87 | 1.65 |
| RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 107% | 83% | 1.29 | 1.00 |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 148% | 122% | 1.21 | 1.27 |
| STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 150% | 129% | 1.16 | 1.48 |
| CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 155% | 137% | 1.13 | 1.68 |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 100% | 88% | 1.13 | 0.74 |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 106% | 97% | 1.10 | 0.87 |
| URI United Rentals, Inc. | 177% | 165% | 1.07 | 1.90 |
| TX Ternium S.A. | 134% | 150% | 0.90 | 1.36 |
| VMC Vulcan Materials Company | 75% | 91% | 0.83 | 0.83 |
| CMC Commercial Metals Company | 151% | 188% | 0.81 | 1.44 |
| MT ArcelorMittal S.A. | 159% | 209% | 0.76 | 1.77 |
| GGB Gerdau S.A. | 138% | 182% | 0.76 | 1.54 |
| CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 172% | 276% | 0.62 | 2.19 |
| PKX POSCO Holdings Inc. | 112% | 186% | 0.60 | 1.39 |
| SID Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | 113% | 238% | 0.47 | 1.73 |
What diversifies NUE?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with NUE's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing NUE with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in NUE into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+20.6% for NUE alone, +22.0% for the mix).
- CAH made money in nine of the 12 calendar years in which NUE lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and SMH have moved largely independently of NUE over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which NUE lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% NUE and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2020 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2002 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUE Nucor Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +167% | 0.72 | −31.9% | −1.8% | −16.4% | −14.9% | −5.4% | −6.3% | −2.8% | −19.4% | −20.6% | −26.6% | −9.4% | −4.5% | 44.6% | +20.6% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.46 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | −9.0% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 36.5% | +21.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.37 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +3.9% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 36.7% | +23.4% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.42 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +55.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +6.8% | +19.0% | −44.7% | −47.0% | — | — | — | 39.1% | +25.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.11 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | +24.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +4.9% | — | — | — | — | 36.2% | +22.0% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.46 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +28.2% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.7% | +22.2% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41 | +177% | 0.93 | +5.6% | −32.7% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +2.8% | +21.9% | −39.0% | −14.8% | +24.4% | — | — | 38.1% | +22.6% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.36 | +153% | 0.89 | +16.1% | +31.5% | −9.9% | −12.9% | +7.0% | −21.8% | +22.8% | −45.3% | −24.4% | — | — | — | 37.8% | +22.5% |
| EUFN InternationaliShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 0.41 | +133% | 0.89 | +17.2% | −8.5% | −23.1% | −4.7% | −9.7% | −26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.5% | +22.1% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2020 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2002 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUE Nucor Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +167% | 0.72 | −31.9% | −1.8% | −16.4% | −14.9% | −5.4% | −6.3% | −2.8% | −19.4% | −20.6% | −26.6% | −9.4% | −4.5% | 44.6% | +20.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.29 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +10.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −39.6% | −8.3% | +108% | +51.7% | +29.1% | 37.5% | +25.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.34 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | −2.4% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +12.9% | −24.4% | +2.8% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −2.3% | — | — | 41.1% | +38.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.41 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +6.7% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −10.4% | −17.0% | +8.7% | −15.2% | −9.4% | −71.1% | −9.5% | — | 40.2% | +34.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.23 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +27.1% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +11.8% | +13.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +61.2% | +46.9% | +96.3% | 37.1% | +25.2% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.36 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | −27.4% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 38.5% | +27.6% |
Common questions
What was NUE's worst drawdown?
NUE's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 68.3%, from May to November 2008. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were NUE's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, NUE's best year was 2021, when it returned 118%. Its worst was 2024, with a return of -32.0%.
Is there a better investment than NUE?
Among NUE's popular alternatives, RS and CAT earned more than NUE with less volatility over the past 5 years. RS returned 24.8% a year at 28.1% volatility, against 21.7% a year at 37.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ESLT (aerospace & defense) and CW (aerospace & defense) earned more than NUE with less volatility over the past 5 years. ESLT returned 39.8% a year at 34.6% volatility, against 21.7% a year at 37.4%.
Is NUE more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. NUE's volatility over the past 5 years was 37.4%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NUE's return lands within 37.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is NUE's Sharpe ratio?
NUE's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.72, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NUE earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is NUE with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, NUE's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.65 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NUE instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NUE holding.
What are the best alternatives to NUE?
None of the 16 popular alternatives we compared outperformed NUE in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about NUE's strength than about its alternatives.
Did NUE outperform the S&P 500?
NUE finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +42.0%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did NUE do in stock market crashes?
NUE fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when NUE fell 40.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies NUE?
These had a low correlation with NUE over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.46), DXJ (correlation 0.37) and SMH (correlation 0.42); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.29), CLS (correlation 0.34) and FIX (correlation 0.41). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than NUE's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of NUE's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.