Relative Intelligence · Banks

How Banco Santander (SAN) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SAN alone. It places SAN (Banco Santander, S.A.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SAN stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: SAN's full trading record, from July 1987 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, SAN fell 1.4% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) rose 3.1% and BAC (Bank of America) fell 15.8%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?SAN fell 1.4% over the past 3 months, 5.4 points ahead of the banks ETF KBE (State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF), which fell 6.8%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its bank peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) rose 3.1%, while BAC (Bank of America) fell 15.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsSAN has run far ahead of the market, rising 35.9% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (305% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termSAN's 10-year return of 332% puts it ahead of 77% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. SAN turned $10,000 into $43,200 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Market rank ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, SAN has typically fallen 1.7 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationSAN is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.38 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.39 with the total US market, less closely than 52% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group), SMFG (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group) and HSBC earned more than SAN with less volatility over the past 5 years. MUFG returned 33.2% a year at 29.4% volatility, against 31.7% a year at 33.9%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, banks) earned more than SAN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 33.6% a year at 30.6% volatility, against 31.7% a year at 33.9%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only ten of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SAN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them HSBC, GE (GE Aerospace) and MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group).
How much would $10,000 in SAN have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SAN over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SAN over the same span and SAN's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in SAN at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $81,349 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SAN, and BCH finished highest, at $210,582.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 610 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SAN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BCH$210,582+2,006% total · +11.1% a year
- JPM$189,407+1,794% total · +10.7% a year
- AXP$184,080+1,741% total · +10.6% a year
- BSAC$164,332+1,543% total · +10.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- BBVA$107,161+972% total · +8.5% a year
- SAN$81,349+713% total · +7.5% a year
- ING$45,632+356% total · +5.4% a year
- MUFG$22,774+128% total · +2.9% a year
- C$11,853+18.5% total · +0.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 157 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SAN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BBVA$57,750+478% total · +42.0% a year
- IBKR$56,308+463% total · +41.3% a year
- HSBC$51,297+413% total · +38.7% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- MFG$46,041+360% total · +35.7% a year
- SAN$45,493+355% total · +35.4% a year
- SMFG$44,827+348% total · +35.0% a year
- MUFG$44,537+345% total · +34.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MA$16,338+63.4% total · +10.3% a year
SAN at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- SAN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1987 was 78.9%, from May 2008 to September 2020. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, SAN's best was 2025, when it returned 165%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 52.3%. It lost money in 12 of those years.
- SAN is 12.8% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $194B
- Industry
- Banks - Diversified
- Price history from
- July 1987
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +35.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +305%+59.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- +295%+31.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +332%+15.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +165%2025
- Worst calendar year
- −52.3%2008
- Losing years
- 12 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 33.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.99return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −78.9%May 2008 to Sep 2020
- From its all-time high
- −12.8%below the peak
SAN against the whole market
Where SAN ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does SAN rank among all stocks?
This section ranks SAN on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how SAN stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), SAN ranks in the top 4% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | SAN | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +35.9% | 827 of 3,287 | top 25% |
| 3-year return | +305% | 216 of 3,017 | top 7% |
| 5-year return | +295% | 176 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| 10-year return | +332% | 516 of 2,202 | top 23% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 33.9% | 1,049 of 2,893 | top 36% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.99 | 106 of 2,893 | top 4% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −73.8% | 1,419 of 2,187 | bottom 36% |
What has beaten SAN on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). SAN sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than SAN with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Ten stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SAN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half SAN's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 27% less than SAN's 33.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.99 for SAN.
- Among SAN's popular alternatives, HSBC, SMFG and MUFG are in the region. HSBC earned 33.1% a year against 31.7% a year for SAN, at 25.9% volatility, 23% less than SAN's 33.9%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to SAN; faint dots are 4 more of the 10 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than SAN?
Investments that beat SAN over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among SAN's popular alternatives, MUFG, SMFG and HSBC earned more than SAN with less volatility over the past 5 years. MUFG returned 33.2% a year at 29.4% volatility, against 31.7% a year at 33.9%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MFG (banks) earned more than SAN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 33.6% a year at 30.6% volatility, against 31.7% a year at 33.9%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only ten of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SAN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them HSBC, GE and MUFG.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat SAN over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks SAN's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than SAN follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than SAN's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× SAN's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than SAN's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with SAN?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.38 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 4 shownThe investments people most often weigh against SAN. 4 of 24 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.34 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.65 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.86 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 5 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus SAN's specific themes. 5 of 119 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.34 | — | ||
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.58 | — | ||
CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Higher return in most periods | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.50 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatility | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.28 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +8.9% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | +407% | 0.15 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 94 of 3,490 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.00 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.02 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.04 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.25 | 0.35% | ||
BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.56 | — | |
IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.37 | 0.40% | |
What these numbers mean for SAN
- Annual return
- SAN returned 31.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $39,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- SAN's volatility over the past 5 years was 33.9%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SAN's return lands within 33.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- SAN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.99, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SAN earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- SAN's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 73.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 73.8% fall takes a 281% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, SAN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.38 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SAN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SAN holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 10 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than SAN with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with SAN | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.17 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.02 | — | |
| 3 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.33 | — |
| 4 | Same or nearby category | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.34 | — | |
| 5 | Popular alternative | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.35 | — | |
| 6 | Popular alternative | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.34 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.21 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | 0.31 | — | |
| 9 | Popular alternative | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.65 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.54 | — |
SAN against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against SAN, compared period by period and year by year.
How do SAN's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at SAN, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Four of the 24 popular alternatives, led by BBVA, SMFG and MUFG, were both more rewarding and calmer than SAN over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, SAN returned 31.6% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (33.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than SAN with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | +38.7% | 33.3% |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | +35.7% | 59.3% |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | +33.7% | 29.4% |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | +33.2% | 29.4% |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | +33.1% | 25.9% |
| SAN This pageBanco Santander, S.A. | +31.6% | 33.9% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | +31.2% | 58.3% |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | +26.3% | 33.8% |
| UBS UBS Group AG | +25.4% | 30.4% |
| BCH Banco de Chile | +25.2% | 28.2% |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | +24.7% | 31.1% |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | +22.1% | 37.4% |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | +20.3% | 32.1% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | +19.5% | 29.0% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | +18.5% | 34.1% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | +17.3% | 24.3% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | +15.1% | 29.4% |
| AXP American Express Company | +13.5% | 29.3% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | +12.8% | 19.9% |
| V Visa Inc. | +12.8% | 22.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | +12.4% | 23.8% |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | +11.1% | 39.3% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | +4.0% | 26.6% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | +3.2% | 49.5% |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | −0.5% | 34.4% |
Has SAN consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares SAN with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than SAN helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Three of the 25 popular alternatives, MUFG, SMFG and BBVA, outperformed SAN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- HSBC, BBVA and SMFG earned more for the risk they took than SAN (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than SAN over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. (this page) | — | −10.2% | −1.4% | +4.5% | +9.8% | +35.9% | +305% | +295% | +332% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | — | $194B | — |
| MUFG QualifiedMitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | −6.9% | +1.8% | +19.6% | +36.5% | +41.3% | +184% | +319% | +483% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | — | $244B | — |
| SMFG QualifiedSumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −7.9% | −1.3% | +15.9% | +28.3% | +53.5% | +181% | +327% | +474% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | — | $94B | — |
| BBVA QualifiedBanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −10.4% | +3.1% | +11.7% | +11.3% | +35.2% | +281% | +413% | +542% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | — | $142B | — |
| MA Financial - Credit ServicesMastercard Incorporated | 4/5 short1/3 long | +9.5% | +13.5% | +20.5% | +10.9% | +10.3% | +64.3% | +79.2% | +541% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | — | $543B | — |
| V Financial - Credit ServicesVisa Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +9.9% | +13.0% | +30.0% | +18.0% | +19.0% | +78.2% | +82.5% | +429% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | — | $759B | — |
| JPM Banks - DiversifiedJPMorgan Chase & Co. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −4.3% | −0.6% | +6.8% | +5.0% | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | — | $891B | — |
| MELI Specialty RetailMercadoLibre, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +3.2% | +2.6% | +0.5% | −4.8% | −10.6% | +60.7% | +17.2% | +1,002% | 49.5% | 0.31 | −69.1% | — | $95B | — |
| UBS Banks - DiversifiedUBS Group AG | 2/5 short1/3 long | −7.5% | −8.3% | +10.6% | +2.9% | +26.3% | +116% | +210% | +374% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | — | $145B | — |
| HSBC Banks - DiversifiedHSBC Holdings plc | 2/5 short1/3 long | −10.1% | −5.9% | +2.3% | +19.8% | +47.7% | +201% | +318% | +319% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | — | $324B | — |
| AXP Financial - Credit ServicesAmerican Express Company | 1/5 short1/3 long | +1.8% | −9.3% | −2.9% | −13.8% | −7.9% | +133% | +88.5% | +446% | 29.3% | 0.58 | −49.6% | — | $215B | — |
| BMA Banks - RegionalBanco Macro S.A. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −15.8% | −30.1% | −22.1% | −25.9% | +25.7% | +297% | +360% | +14.9% | 59.3% | 0.81 | −91.7% | — | $4.0B | — |
| ITUB BanksItaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +14.8% | +16.7% | +5.8% | +37.2% | +46.3% | +147% | +221% | +190% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | — | $107B | — |
| BNS Banks - DiversifiedThe Bank of Nova Scotia | 5/5 short0/3 long | −2.3% | +6.9% | +22.4% | +28.9% | +50.0% | +162% | +83.1% | +187% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | — | $112B | — |
| ING Banks - DiversifiedING Groep N.V. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −10.7% | +2.4% | +14.0% | +18.9% | +42.5% | +209% | +201% | +339% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | — | $94B | — |
| BSAC Banks - RegionalBanco Santander-Chile | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.1% | +0.2% | −2.0% | +11.4% | +24.0% | +124% | +144% | +154% | 29.0% | 0.76 | −63.9% | — | $16B | — |
| BBD Banks - RegionalBanco Bradesco S.A. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +18.3% | +15.9% | +1.7% | +29.1% | +31.6% | +90.7% | +69.3% | +35.5% | 39.3% | 0.47 | −67.7% | — | $43B | — |
| BSBR Banks - RegionalBanco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −4.4% | +6.0% | −10.8% | −6.8% | +6.6% | +18.6% | −2.6% | −1.2% | 34.4% | 0.16 | −70.6% | — | $42B | — |
| NU Banks - RegionalNu Holdings Ltd. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +7.9% | −0.1% | −11.3% | −2.1% | +84.7% | — | — | — | — | −72.1% | — | $73B | — |
| C Banks - DiversifiedCitigroup Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −9.3% | −4.3% | −7.0% | +4.8% | +26.0% | +238% | +102% | +234% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | — | $206B | — |
| LYG Banks - RegionalLloyds Banking Group plc | 1/5 short0/3 long | −8.1% | −6.7% | −2.5% | +1.7% | +22.4% | +207% | +152% | +213% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −66.5% | — | $80B | — |
| BCH Banks - RegionalBanco de Chile | 1/5 short0/3 long | −4.6% | −1.0% | −3.7% | +8.6% | +25.2% | +138% | +208% | +180% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | — | $20B | — |
| BAC Banks - DiversifiedBank of America Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.6% | −15.8% | −5.2% | −8.0% | −0.6% | +107% | +21.6% | +282% | 26.6% | 0.28 | −49.0% | — | $354B | — |
| BCS Banks - DiversifiedBarclays PLC | 0/5 short0/3 long | −11.7% | −17.1% | −6.2% | −13.3% | +15.1% | +242% | +134% | +238% | 34.1% | 0.67 | −66.0% | — | $75B | — |
| DB Banks - RegionalDeutsche Bank AG | 0/5 short0/3 long | −17.1% | −8.6% | −1.6% | −17.0% | −3.1% | +244% | +171% | +165% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −72.7% | — | $60B | — |
| GGAL Banks - RegionalGrupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −15.0% | −28.7% | −24.7% | −31.9% | +14.1% | +254% | +288% | +48.4% | 58.3% | 0.75 | −91.7% | — | $6.0B | — |
How did SAN do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where SAN ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with SAN and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- SAN finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, MA came out ahead of SAN most often, in 14 of the 19 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SAN finished in the top quarter in three of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 1 of 26.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of SAN; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places SAN among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of SAN | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN This pageBanco Santander, S.A. | — | +165% | +14.9% | +46.4% | −6.8% | +10.2% | −19.6% | −2.2% | −28.5% | +33.3% | +12.3% | −37.9% | −0.4% | +27.4% | +22.8% | −20.2% | −30.2% | +91.8% | −52.3% | +20.2% | +47.1% | +10.5% | +6.8% | +77.6% | −11.3% | −19.8% | −7.6% | +20.1% | +23.7% | +53.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 29 | 1 of 26 | 17 of 26 | 8 of 26 | 17 of 26 | 14 of 25 | 16 of 25 | 20 of 25 | 17 of 25 | 13 of 25 | 11 of 25 | 23 of 25 | 12 of 25 | 14 of 25 | 15 of 25 | 14 of 25 | 24 of 25 | 8 of 24 | 11 of 23 | 4 of 22 | 2 of 19 | 9 of 19 | 18 of 19 | 6 of 19 | 8 of 18 | 11 of 16 | 11 of 14 | 8 of 12 | 4 of 12 | 6 of 13 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 14 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +40.0% | +39.7% | +32.7% | +26.2% | +27.9% | −13.7% | +15.8% | −31.3% | +20.7% | +2.5% | +15.2% | −14.6% | +26.0% | +33.1% | −19.9% | +13.3% | −19.1% | −32.3% | −24.2% | −8.6% | +35.4% | +31.3% | +47.6% | −16.0% | −33.1% | −30.0% | +33.4% | −24.8% | −24.2% |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 12 of 19 | +38.0% | +54.8% | +25.7% | +24.5% | +18.6% | −10.9% | +19.4% | −22.2% | +18.0% | +5.2% | +7.7% | −28.7% | +47.2% | +38.4% | −19.2% | +30.0% | −28.6% | −43.6% | −27.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 14 of 29 | +154% | +14.2% | +62.5% | +10.0% | +22.2% | −6.4% | +10.9% | −35.0% | +31.3% | −1.5% | −19.3% | −20.6% | +39.6% | +18.2% | −10.8% | −39.7% | +53.1% | −45.6% | +4.6% | +39.4% | +4.1% | +32.9% | +47.9% | −19.3% | −13.1% | +8.9% | −9.5% | +51.7% | +85.6% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 14 of 19 | +9.0% | +24.2% | +23.4% | −2.7% | +1.2% | +20.2% | +59.2% | +25.3% | +47.7% | +6.9% | +13.8% | +3.7% | +70.7% | +32.1% | +66.7% | −12.2% | +79.8% | −33.4% | +119% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| V Visa Inc. | 12 of 17 | +11.8% | +22.3% | +26.3% | −3.4% | −0.3% | +17.1% | +43.3% | +16.5% | +47.2% | +1.4% | +19.1% | +18.7% | +48.0% | +50.5% | +45.4% | −18.9% | +68.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 15 of 29 | +37.3% | +44.3% | +30.6% | −12.6% | +27.8% | −5.5% | +47.3% | −6.6% | +26.8% | +34.5% | +8.4% | +9.9% | +36.7% | +36.2% | −19.9% | +2.3% | +34.4% | −25.1% | −6.9% | +25.7% | +5.7% | +10.0% | +60.5% | −30.7% | −17.4% | −10.1% | +11.7% | +32.9% | +25.5% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 12 of 18 | +18.4% | +8.2% | +85.7% | −37.2% | −19.5% | +193% | +95.3% | −6.9% | +102% | +37.1% | −10.1% | +19.2% | +38.0% | −0.7% | +19.9% | +28.5% | +216% | −77.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 12 of 25 | +57.6% | +0.7% | +69.8% | +7.4% | +29.4% | +19.5% | +7.1% | −29.9% | +17.4% | −14.4% | +18.1% | −10.2% | +23.3% | +34.3% | −28.2% | +6.2% | +8.5% | −68.9% | −21.5% | +32.5% | +18.2% | +27.9% | +50.4% | +1.7% | −8.0% | — | — | — | — |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 14 of 27 | +67.9% | +34.5% | +39.3% | +7.8% | +20.8% | −31.7% | +1.5% | −16.1% | +35.9% | +9.9% | −11.5% | −10.2% | +8.5% | +45.9% | −22.2% | −7.5% | +22.2% | −38.0% | −4.0% | +18.9% | −1.5% | +12.6% | +52.3% | −5.2% | −15.3% | +6.5% | — | — | +15.8% |
| AXP American Express Company | 18 of 29 | +26.0% | +60.3% | +28.7% | −8.5% | +36.9% | −1.1% | +32.5% | −2.6% | +36.2% | +8.6% | −24.2% | +3.7% | +59.8% | +23.6% | +11.6% | +7.8% | +126% | −63.7% | −13.4% | +19.1% | +4.3% | +17.6% | +37.7% | +0.2% | −34.5% | −0.3% | +63.3% | +15.7% | +59.9% |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 9 of 19 | −3.6% | +266% | +84.9% | +26.5% | −10.0% | −57.0% | −14.1% | −60.7% | +81.5% | +12.2% | +32.9% | +86.4% | +33.8% | −7.0% | −58.8% | +74.0% | +183% | −54.5% | −19.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 15 of 23 | +79.3% | −24.2% | +54.5% | +30.0% | −22.8% | −30.5% | +8.1% | +13.6% | +31.3% | +76.8% | −44.0% | +9.9% | −5.2% | −6.8% | −19.1% | +8.8% | +125% | −38.8% | +50.9% | +57.9% | +65.1% | +61.5% | +126% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 15 of 26 | +45.1% | +17.5% | +6.0% | −28.8% | +40.6% | +1.7% | +17.5% | −19.2% | +20.5% | +43.7% | −25.1% | −4.2% | +11.5% | +21.0% | −9.6% | +27.1% | +82.6% | −44.4% | +16.6% | +16.8% | +21.4% | +40.4% | +59.9% | +232% | +17.5% | +25.4% | — | — | — |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 12 of 29 | +91.3% | +12.2% | +32.0% | −4.4% | +55.4% | −21.6% | +20.6% | −39.4% | +36.7% | +11.1% | +6.4% | −7.4% | +47.6% | +32.5% | −26.8% | −0.2% | −11.7% | −69.6% | −8.2% | +31.9% | +20.8% | +36.1% | +48.7% | −31.3% | −34.4% | +35.1% | +0.4% | +49.9% | +25.1% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 16 of 29 | +74.3% | +0.9% | +31.6% | +3.0% | −11.0% | −13.0% | −19.9% | −0.1% | +49.4% | +30.8% | −5.8% | −12.7% | −13.9% | +1.4% | −16.0% | +50.3% | +96.2% | −27.7% | +9.8% | +12.0% | +39.6% | +53.0% | +35.1% | −8.5% | +23.0% | −3.8% | +56.4% | −29.6% | +1.1% |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 11 of 24 | +96.9% | −42.2% | +34.8% | −5.1% | −25.4% | −33.6% | +15.7% | +9.7% | +33.6% | +108% | −55.3% | +9.1% | −19.5% | +6.1% | −16.2% | +13.9% | +124% | −52.7% | +58.7% | +39.4% | +133% | +445% | +78.3% | −41.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 6 of 16 | +62.5% | −39.7% | +23.0% | +2.9% | −34.2% | −27.0% | +14.0% | +21.3% | +12.2% | +143% | −20.0% | −12.2% | −15.3% | −7.3% | −37.5% | +2.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | 2 of 4 | +61.6% | +24.4% | +105% | −56.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 12 of 29 | +70.4% | +41.9% | +19.0% | −22.1% | +0.9% | −19.7% | +57.9% | −28.5% | +27.0% | +15.9% | −4.1% | +3.9% | +31.8% | +50.5% | −44.3% | +42.9% | −50.6% | −75.9% | −44.8% | +19.6% | +4.6% | +2.8% | +41.6% | −20.4% | +0.1% | +23.6% | +70.2% | −6.8% | +79.9% |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 8 of 24 | +104% | +20.2% | +14.5% | −9.7% | +34.6% | −36.5% | +36.9% | −28.4% | +26.8% | −25.9% | −4.4% | −12.7% | +66.1% | +104% | −61.7% | +25.4% | −27.5% | −77.5% | −11.6% | +42.9% | −1.5% | +22.5% | +25.3% | −33.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 15 of 29 | +77.6% | +3.9% | +20.3% | +39.2% | −21.6% | +1.1% | −24.7% | −6.9% | +45.0% | +25.9% | −8.2% | −16.5% | −3.7% | +24.0% | −2.5% | +72.4% | +79.1% | −25.6% | −3.3% | +37.0% | +9.5% | +43.4% | +81.3% | −6.8% | +28.8% | −18.8% | +51.0% | −35.4% | −5.4% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 16 of 29 | +28.0% | +33.9% | +4.9% | −23.8% | +49.6% | −11.6% | +46.1% | −15.0% | +35.7% | +33.4% | −4.8% | +15.7% | +34.5% | +109% | −58.1% | −11.2% | +7.6% | −63.1% | −18.9% | +20.8% | +2.4% | +21.5% | +20.1% | +14.6% | +42.7% | −4.5% | −14.0% | +1.2% | +27.3% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 12 of 29 | +96.5% | +76.2% | +6.0% | −21.9% | +31.6% | −12.8% | +31.9% | −29.3% | +0.5% | −12.8% | −11.4% | −14.9% | +16.1% | +61.7% | −31.9% | −4.7% | +80.0% | −73.6% | −27.2% | +44.2% | −4.0% | +31.1% | +55.0% | −23.6% | +7.7% | +16.0% | +30.3% | −16.6% | +62.3% |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 11 of 29 | +133% | +29.4% | +21.4% | −5.9% | +14.7% | +40.1% | −2.9% | −56.7% | +6.4% | −25.0% | −17.7% | −36.4% | +10.9% | +19.7% | −26.1% | −20.1% | +75.4% | −65.5% | −0.6% | +42.0% | +12.3% | +9.8% | +83.6% | −34.3% | −22.1% | 0.0% | +58.2% | −16.7% | +54.6% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 11 of 25 | −11.4% | +289% | +92.3% | +7.3% | +9.5% | −45.6% | −40.4% | −57.9% | +145% | −0.3% | +70.8% | +52.5% | +58.8% | +12.4% | −61.1% | +166% | +155% | −70.2% | −20.7% | +38.3% | −19.4% | +27.3% | +234% | −36.9% | −78.4% | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How SAN has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were SAN's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents SAN's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1987, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of SAN's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: SAN fell 78.9% from May 2008 to September 2020, while the S&P 500 rose 192%.
- The slowest recovery came after SAN fell 78.9% from May 2008 to September 2020; it did not regain that peak until March 2025, four years later.
Green means SAN fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | SAN fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −78.9% | +192% | May 2008 | Sep 2020 | 12.3 years | Mar 2025 | 4.5 years |
| Dot-com bust | −63.7% | −30.6% | Jul 1998 | Oct 2002 | 4.3 years | Jan 2004 | 15 months |
| No named crash | −49.0% | — | Jan 1989 | Mar 1995 | 6.2 years | Jan 1997 | 22 months |
| No named crash | −25.3% | — | Oct 1987 | Nov 1987 | 1 month | Apr 1988 | 5 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −24.8% | −11.3% | Dec 2007 | Feb 2008 | 2 months | May 2008 | 3 months |
How did SAN do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far SAN, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- SAN fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when SAN fell 44.7% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, HSBC held up best, falling less than SAN in all ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than SAN.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN This pageBanco Santander, S.A. | — | −11.4% | −41.0% | −48.1% | −19.0% | −6.0% | −44.7% | −33.2% | −0.9% | −76.1% | −58.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −9.5% | −33.4% | −33.0% | −27.0% | −6.7% | −45.1% | −20.7% | −0.3% | −65.5% | −65.1% |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 7 of 9 | −9.2% | −24.7% | −32.2% | −23.2% | −4.5% | −44.2% | −19.8% | −2.2% | −70.9% | — |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 5 of 10 | −10.9% | −39.6% | −47.9% | −22.7% | −5.4% | −41.0% | −32.7% | 0.0% | −75.7% | −55.9% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 6 of 9 | −4.0% | −28.2% | −41.0% | −21.9% | −5.8% | −20.4% | −13.8% | −3.1% | −62.7% | — |
| V Visa Inc. | 5 of 8 | −3.5% | −24.1% | −36.4% | −19.1% | −5.8% | −15.8% | −11.5% | −0.8% | — | — |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 7 of 10 | −5.4% | −37.9% | −42.5% | −21.3% | −5.6% | −22.0% | −32.1% | −0.1% | −67.7% | −74.0% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −7.2% | −51.6% | −39.1% | −30.3% | −8.8% | −31.9% | −39.5% | 0.0% | −89.5% | — |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 4 of 9 | −9.5% | −32.5% | −42.3% | −28.5% | −8.2% | −36.7% | −39.7% | −0.9% | −87.5% | — |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 10 of 10 | −7.3% | −31.8% | −20.5% | −13.1% | −4.6% | −30.8% | −25.1% | 0.0% | −73.8% | −41.4% |
| AXP American Express Company | 4 of 10 | −9.8% | −31.6% | −49.6% | −20.7% | −8.6% | −36.6% | −18.1% | −4.5% | −83.4% | −59.1% |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 1 of 9 | −11.1% | −41.2% | −55.7% | −26.4% | −6.3% | −27.9% | −48.1% | −0.5% | −77.5% | — |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 7 of 9 | −8.1% | −31.5% | −46.3% | −7.5% | −5.8% | −32.4% | −30.1% | −0.7% | −69.2% | — |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 9 of 10 | −4.6% | −35.4% | −43.0% | −17.7% | −6.1% | −24.3% | −19.8% | 0.0% | −63.8% | −23.6% |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 2 of 10 | −10.7% | −43.4% | −56.9% | −24.1% | −5.8% | −35.4% | −47.4% | −3.6% | −93.0% | −66.4% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 9 of 10 | −6.0% | −37.0% | −38.1% | −12.4% | −4.5% | −22.6% | −29.0% | −1.2% | −48.4% | −28.0% |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 5 of 9 | −6.9% | −30.2% | −54.5% | −7.6% | −6.3% | −44.3% | −25.1% | −0.8% | −69.0% | — |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 5 of 8 | −8.6% | −37.6% | −50.4% | −13.9% | −6.2% | −31.4% | −30.5% | −4.0% | — | — |
| NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | 1 of 2 | −10.0% | −67.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 3 of 10 | −11.7% | −39.2% | −54.8% | −33.1% | −6.7% | −40.3% | −42.6% | −1.0% | −97.7% | −52.7% |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 3 of 9 | −7.8% | −40.5% | −53.4% | −23.3% | −4.3% | −34.6% | −41.6% | −4.5% | −94.8% | — |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 9 of 10 | −2.1% | −27.0% | −29.8% | −10.5% | −2.7% | −15.2% | −25.4% | −1.4% | −57.6% | −37.3% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 3 of 10 | −12.4% | −38.7% | −47.8% | −26.4% | −6.9% | −37.8% | −45.2% | −0.6% | −93.4% | −36.3% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 3 of 10 | −10.2% | −48.1% | −57.1% | −22.9% | −4.1% | −50.6% | −44.9% | −4.8% | −93.9% | −38.4% |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 1 of 10 | −11.6% | −54.2% | −48.6% | −36.3% | −9.3% | −54.8% | −46.8% | 0.0% | −82.7% | −64.9% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 1 of 9 | −14.5% | −44.7% | −58.1% | −27.3% | −8.5% | −22.1% | −47.8% | −1.5% | −82.4% | — |
How closely does SAN move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares SAN with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- MUFG took just 42% of the S&P 500's losses, against 92% for SAN, while still keeping 84% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, SAN captured 101% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 92% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.02. Its share of the market's gains was slightly larger than its share of the losses.
- Ten of the 24 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SAN's 1.10, led by BCH, MUFG and SMFG.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than SAN's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN This pageBanco Santander, S.A. | 101% | 92% | 1.10 | 1.02 |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 45% | 19% | 2.41 | 0.36 |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 84% | 42% | 2.01 | 0.66 |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 84% | 43% | 1.94 | 0.65 |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 79% | 53% | 1.49 | 0.58 |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 121% | 97% | 1.25 | 1.11 |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 135% | 111% | 1.21 | 1.44 |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 105% | 88% | 1.20 | 0.95 |
| V Visa Inc. | 93% | 79% | 1.18 | 0.87 |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 66% | 58% | 1.15 | 0.65 |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.14 | 1.09 |
| AXP American Express Company | 117% | 113% | 1.03 | 1.16 |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 66% | 65% | 1.01 | 0.66 |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 116% | 120% | 0.97 | 1.18 |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 136% | 155% | 0.88 | 1.36 |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 127% | 146% | 0.87 | 1.36 |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 113% | 131% | 0.86 | 1.26 |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 102% | 118% | 0.86 | 1.21 |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 106% | 130% | 0.82 | 1.20 |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 97% | 120% | 0.81 | 1.05 |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 131% | 165% | 0.80 | 1.49 |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 62% | 103% | 0.60 | 0.72 |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 140% | 234% | 0.60 | 1.52 |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 113% | 202% | 0.56 | 1.36 |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 56% | 102% | 0.55 | 0.74 |
What diversifies SAN?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with SAN's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing SAN with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in SAN into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+35.4% for SAN alone, +36.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and SMH have moved largely independently of SAN over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.37 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in eight of the 12 calendar years in which SAN lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which SAN lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% SAN and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. (this page) | 1.00 | +295% | 0.99 | −6.8% | −19.6% | −2.2% | −28.5% | −37.9% | −0.4% | −20.2% | −30.2% | −52.3% | −11.3% | −19.8% | −7.6% | 30.2% | +35.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.33 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +3.9% | +18.9% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | — | — | — | 25.2% | +34.5% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.37 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −13.4% | +23.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.4% | +31.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.25 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | +55.5% | +64.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +6.8% | +19.0% | −44.7% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 26.8% | +37.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.25 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | +24.8% | +17.9% | −1.9% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +4.9% | — | — | — | 25.3% | +32.7% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.32 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | +28.2% | +25.9% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.8% | +33.5% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.30 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −32.7% | +11.7% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +2.8% | +21.9% | −39.0% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | 26.2% | +33.9% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.48 | +109% | 0.90 | −14.2% | −0.2% | +27.2% | −11.1% | −4.1% | +12.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.4% | +32.4% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.33 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | +31.5% | +33.4% | −9.9% | −12.9% | +7.0% | −21.8% | +22.8% | −45.3% | −24.4% | +2.1% | — | 26.3% | +33.6% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. (this page) | 1.00 | +295% | 0.99 | −6.8% | −19.6% | −2.2% | −28.5% | −37.9% | −0.4% | −20.2% | −30.2% | −52.3% | −11.3% | −19.8% | −7.6% | 30.2% | +35.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.17 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | +10.1% | +18.0% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −39.6% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 25.6% | +37.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.16 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −2.4% | −5.7% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +12.9% | −24.4% | +2.8% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 28.5% | +51.8% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.15 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +6.7% | +15.1% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −10.4% | −17.0% | +8.7% | −15.2% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 27.0% | +47.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.02 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +27.1% | +26.7% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +11.8% | +13.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 24.8% | +36.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.26 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −27.4% | +6.0% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.6% | +39.4% |
Common questions
What was SAN's worst drawdown?
SAN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1987 was 78.9%, from May 2008 to September 2020. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were SAN's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, SAN's best year was 2025, when it returned 165%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -52.3%.
Is there a better investment than SAN?
Among SAN's popular alternatives, MUFG, SMFG and HSBC earned more than SAN with less volatility over the past 5 years. MUFG returned 33.2% a year at 29.4% volatility, against 31.7% a year at 33.9%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MFG (banks) earned more than SAN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 33.6% a year at 30.6% volatility, against 31.7% a year at 33.9%.
Is SAN more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. SAN's volatility over the past 5 years was 33.9%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SAN's return lands within 33.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is SAN's Sharpe ratio?
SAN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.99, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SAN earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is SAN with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, SAN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.38 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SAN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SAN holding.
What are the best alternatives to SAN?
Of the 25 popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed SAN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: MUFG, SMFG and BBVA.
Did SAN outperform the S&P 500?
SAN finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +165%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did SAN do in stock market crashes?
SAN fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when SAN fell 44.7% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies SAN?
These had a low correlation with SAN over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.33), EMLP (correlation 0.37) and SMH (correlation 0.25); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.17), CLS (correlation 0.16) and FIX (correlation 0.15). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than SAN's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of SAN's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.