Relative Intelligence · Banks

How Itaú Unibanco Holding (ITUB) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ITUB alone. It places ITUB (Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.) against 18 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ITUB stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ITUB's full trading record, from February 2002 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, ITUB rose 16.7% against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Both ITUB and the S&P 500 are within a few percent of a record high. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?ITUB's 16.7% gain over the past 3 months is part of a broader banks rally: the banks ETF EWZ (iShares MSCI Brazil ETF) rose 21.0%, with BBD (Banco Bradesco, up 15.9%) and CIB (Grupo Cibest, up 20.5%). Last month cut against the tape: ITUB rose 14.8% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsITUB has run far ahead of the market, rising 46.3% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (147% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termITUB turned $10,000 into $29,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: ITUB rose 221% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, ITUB has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationITUB is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.22 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.23 with the total US market, less closely than 83% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years ITUB gave up some upside in exchange for smaller losses: 66% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 58% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.65. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- BAP (Credicorp) and BLX (Bladex) earned more than ITUB with less volatility over the past 5 years. BAP returned 30.8% a year at 30.2% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 33.8%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, banks) and SMFG (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, banks) earned more than ITUB with less volatility over the past 5 years. MFG returned 33.6% a year at 30.6% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 33.8%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 23 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ITUB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them CAT (Caterpillar), HSBC and GE (GE Aerospace).
How much would $10,000 in ITUB have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ITUB over the past 24 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ITUB over the same span and ITUB's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in ITUB at the end of September 2002 would have grown to $760,624 by September 2026, more than the $144,215 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ITUB, and CIB finished highest, at $1,933,846.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2002 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 78 of the 1,370 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ITUB; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CIB$2M+19,238% total · +24.5% a year
- BAP$1M+11,517% total · +21.9% a year
- BLX$1M+11,011% total · +21.7% a year
- BBD$836,693+8,267% total · +20.3% a year
- GGAL$798,025+7,880% total · +20.0% a year
- ITUB$760,624+7,506% total · +19.8% a year
- BCH$292,044+2,820% total · +15.1% a year
- BBAR$171,794+1,618% total · +12.6% a year
- EWZ$152,031+1,420% total · +12.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$144,215+1,342% total · +11.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 364 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ITUB; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BMA$52,536+425% total · +39.3% a year
- GGAL$47,440+374% total · +36.5% a year
- BBAR$46,390+364% total · +35.9% a year
- MFG$46,041+360% total · +35.7% a year
- SMFG$44,827+348% total · +35.0% a year
- BAP$44,181+342% total · +34.6% a year
- BLX$42,192+322% total · +33.4% a year
- CIB$41,844+318% total · +33.1% a year
- ITUB$29,014+190% total · +23.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
ITUB at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- ITUB's deepest decline since it began trading in 2002 was 69.2%, from May to October 2008. It took 12 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 23 full calendar years, ITUB's best was 2003, when it returned 126%, and its worst was 2015, when it lost 44.0%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- ITUB is 4.5% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $107B
- Industry
- Banks
- Price history from
- February 2002
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +46.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +147%+35.1% a year
- Past 5 years
- +221%+26.3% a year
- Past 10 years
- +190%+11.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +126%2003
- Worst calendar year
- −44.0%2015
- Losing years
- 8 of 23full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 33.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.86return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −69.2%May 2008 to Oct 2008
- From its all-time high
- −4.5%below the peak
ITUB against the whole market
Where ITUB ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ITUB rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ITUB on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ITUB stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), ITUB ranks in the top 7% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ITUB | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +46.3% | 609 of 3,287 | top 19% |
| 3-year return | +147% | 618 of 3,017 | top 20% |
| 5-year return | +221% | 272 of 2,893 | top 9% |
| 10-year return | +190% | 904 of 2,202 | top 41% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 33.8% | 1,043 of 2,893 | top 36% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.86 | 212 of 2,893 | top 7% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −62.1% | 964 of 2,187 | top 44% |
What has beaten ITUB on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ITUB sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ITUB with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 22 stocks and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ITUB over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half ITUB's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 27% less than ITUB's 33.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.86 for ITUB.
- Among ITUB's popular alternatives, BLX and BAP are in the region. BLX earned 31.4% a year against 26.3% a year for ITUB, at 25.9% volatility, 23% less than ITUB's 33.8%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ITUB; faint dots are 13 more of the 23 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than ITUB?
Investments that beat ITUB over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ITUB's popular alternatives, BAP and BLX earned more than ITUB with less volatility over the past 5 years. BAP returned 30.8% a year at 30.2% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 33.8%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MFG (banks) and SMFG (banks) earned more than ITUB with less volatility over the past 5 years. MFG returned 33.6% a year at 30.6% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 33.8%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 23 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ITUB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them CAT, HSBC and GE.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ITUB over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ITUB's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ITUB follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ITUB's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ITUB's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ITUB's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ITUB?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.22 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ITUB. 3 of 17 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.55 | — | |
CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.56 | — | |
BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Higher return, lower volatility | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.35 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus ITUB's specific themes. 11 of 131 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | -0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.19 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +25.3% | 34.4% | 0.83 | −64.1% | +390% | 0.35 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 132 of 3,485 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.01 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.24 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.11 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.21 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.33 | — | ||
SGOLabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF · Gold | On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.0% | 18.8% | 0.98 | −26.3% | +218% | 0.11 | 0.17% | |
What these numbers mean for ITUB
- Annual return
- ITUB returned 26.3% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $32,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ITUB's volatility over the past 5 years was 33.8%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ITUB's return lands within 33.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ITUB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.86, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ITUB earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ITUB's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 62.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 62.1% fall takes a 164% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ITUB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.22 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ITUB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ITUB holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 23 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ITUB with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ITUB | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.31 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.16 | — | |
| 3 | Same or nearby category | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.11 | — | |
| 4 | Same or nearby category | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | -0.01 | — | |
| 5 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.24 | — |
| 6 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.21 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | 0.40 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.31 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.33 | — | |
| 10 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.18 | — |
| 11 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.23 | — |
| 12 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.26 | — |
| 13 | Same or nearby category | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.17 | — | |
| 14 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Popular alternative | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.55 | — |
| 15 | ESQEsquire Financial Holdings, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.7% | 31.7% | 1.03 | −56.5% | — | 0.30 | — |
| 16 | IGICInternational General Insurance Holdings Ltd. · Insurance - Diversified | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.9% | 1.03 | −50.6% | — | -0.10 | — |
| 17 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.40 | 0.59% |
| 18 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.30 | — | |
| 19 | Same or nearby category | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.19 | — | |
| 20 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.16 | — |
| 21 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | 0.14 | — |
| 22 | ARLPAlliance Resource Partners, L.P. · Coal | Whole market | +29.4% | 31.6% | 0.98 | −85.3% | +173% | 0.08 | — |
| 23 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Popular alternative | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.35 | — |
ITUB against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ITUB, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ITUB's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ITUB, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- CIB, BLX and BAP were both more rewarding and calmer than ITUB over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, ITUB returned 26.3% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (33.8% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ITUB with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | +35.7% | 59.3% |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | +32.9% | 32.9% |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | +32.5% | 64.8% |
| BLX Bladex, Inc. | +31.4% | 25.9% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | +31.2% | 58.3% |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | +30.8% | 30.3% |
| ITUB This pageItaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | +26.3% | 33.8% |
| BCH Banco de Chile | +25.2% | 28.2% |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | +24.1% | 71.2% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | +19.5% | 29.0% |
| EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | +14.9% | 27.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | +11.1% | 39.3% |
| AVAL Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores S.A. | +8.7% | 43.2% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | +3.2% | 49.5% |
| XP XP Inc. | −0.2% | 51.5% |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | −0.5% | 34.4% |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | −18.0% | 65.1% |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | −19.8% | 60.6% |
Has ITUB consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ITUB with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ITUB helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- CIB outperformed ITUB in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 18 popular alternatives, CIB and BAP, outperformed ITUB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- BAP and BCH earned more for the risk they took than ITUB (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ITUB over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. (this page) | — | +14.8% | +16.7% | +5.8% | +37.2% | +46.3% | +147% | +221% | +190% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | — | $107B | — |
| CIB QualifiedGrupo Cibest S.A. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | 0.0% | +20.5% | +32.5% | +59.5% | +81.1% | +398% | +314% | +345% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | — | $23B | — |
| BAP QualifiedCredicorp Ltd. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +0.1% | +1.0% | +21.9% | +42.9% | +61.4% | +275% | +283% | +298% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | — | $31B | — |
| BLX Banks - RegionalBladex, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | +1.8% | −4.2% | −0.3% | +32.2% | +29.9% | +201% | +292% | +290% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | — | $1.6B | — |
| GGAL Banks - RegionalGrupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −15.0% | −28.7% | −24.7% | −31.9% | +14.1% | +254% | +288% | +48.4% | 58.3% | 0.75 | −91.7% | — | $6.0B | — |
| BMA Banks - RegionalBanco Macro S.A. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −15.8% | −30.1% | −22.1% | −25.9% | +25.7% | +297% | +360% | +14.9% | 59.3% | 0.81 | −91.7% | — | $4.0B | — |
| BBAR Banks - RegionalBanco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −12.5% | −35.9% | −24.8% | −29.0% | +35.7% | +283% | +309% | −13.5% | 64.8% | 0.75 | −91.6% | — | $2.6B | — |
| MELI Specialty RetailMercadoLibre, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +3.2% | +2.6% | +0.5% | −4.8% | −10.6% | +60.7% | +17.2% | +1,002% | 49.5% | 0.31 | −69.1% | — | $95B | — |
| SUPV Banks - RegionalGrupo Supervielle S.A. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −10.5% | −25.9% | −27.9% | −37.9% | +16.3% | +274% | +194% | −48.9% | 71.2% | 0.65 | −96.0% | — | $676M | — |
| XP Financial - Capital MarketsXP Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +50.8% | +86.5% | +52.5% | +96.2% | +83.7% | +64.5% | −0.9% | — | 51.5% | 0.25 | −79.2% | — | $16B | — |
| PAGS Specialty Business ServicesPagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +23.8% | +29.9% | +9.2% | +29.2% | +38.4% | +73.1% | −66.9% | — | 60.6% | -0.07 | −90.0% | — | $3.2B | — |
| EWZ InternationaliShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | +12.8% | +21.0% | +5.0% | +34.6% | +48.5% | +70.8% | +100% | +90.3% | 27.7% | 0.64 | −57.0% | 0.59% | $14B | — |
| BBD Banks - RegionalBanco Bradesco S.A. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +18.3% | +15.9% | +1.7% | +29.1% | +31.6% | +90.7% | +69.3% | +35.5% | 39.3% | 0.47 | −67.7% | — | $43B | — |
| STNE Software - InfrastructureStoneCo Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +24.3% | +8.5% | −5.1% | −0.6% | −21.7% | +46.8% | −63.0% | — | 65.1% | 0.02 | −92.3% | — | $2.8B | — |
| BCH Banks - RegionalBanco de Chile | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.6% | −1.0% | −3.7% | +8.6% | +25.2% | +138% | +208% | +180% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | — | $20B | — |
| BSAC Banks - RegionalBanco Santander-Chile | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.1% | +0.2% | −2.0% | +11.4% | +24.0% | +124% | +144% | +154% | 29.0% | 0.76 | −63.9% | — | $16B | — |
| AVAL Banks - RegionalGrupo Aval Acciones y Valores S.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.3% | −1.0% | +3.0% | +23.8% | +34.4% | +138% | +51.7% | +34.8% | 43.2% | 0.40 | −62.1% | — | $5.7B | — |
| BSBR Banks - RegionalBanco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.4% | +6.0% | −10.8% | −6.8% | +6.6% | +18.6% | −2.6% | −1.2% | 34.4% | 0.16 | −70.6% | — | $42B | — |
| NU Banks - RegionalNu Holdings Ltd. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +7.9% | −0.1% | −11.3% | −2.1% | +84.7% | — | — | — | — | −72.1% | — | $73B | — |
How did ITUB do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2003, along with where ITUB ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ITUB and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ITUB finished in the top quarter in seven of 23 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 5 of 19.
- ITUB finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 12 of its 23 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, MELI came out ahead of ITUB most often, in 13 of the 18 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ITUB; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ITUB among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ITUB | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITUB This pageItaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | — | +79.3% | −24.2% | +54.5% | +30.0% | −22.8% | −30.5% | +8.1% | +13.6% | +31.3% | +76.8% | −44.0% | +9.9% | −5.2% | −6.8% | −19.1% | +8.8% | +125% | −38.8% | +50.9% | +57.9% | +65.1% | +61.5% | +126% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 23 | 5 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 9 of 19 | 3 of 19 | 12 of 18 | 13 of 18 | 10 of 17 | 2 of 15 | 10 of 15 | 3 of 14 | 13 of 14 | 7 of 13 | 7 of 13 | 11 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 11 of 13 | 5 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 4 of 11 | 2 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 5 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 23 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | 13 of 23 | +122% | +13.6% | +20.6% | −2.0% | −20.8% | −22.6% | +47.2% | −0.8% | +11.4% | +41.9% | −42.2% | +0.4% | −24.2% | +14.7% | −1.5% | +39.4% | +102% | −28.9% | +12.8% | +10.9% | +109% | +176% | +138% |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 11 of 23 | +65.4% | +31.4% | +16.3% | +14.6% | −24.7% | −17.7% | −0.3% | +9.0% | +37.8% | +64.9% | −38.4% | +22.3% | −7.9% | +36.3% | −6.0% | +57.5% | +58.9% | −33.2% | +91.0% | +86.8% | +50.5% | +22.0% | +51.8% |
| BLX Bladex, Inc. | 13 of 23 | +33.1% | +53.7% | +60.6% | +4.3% | +11.6% | −19.4% | +33.0% | −31.3% | −3.4% | +20.6% | −10.3% | +14.2% | +36.5% | +41.6% | −9.1% | +38.7% | +2.5% | −7.3% | −0.5% | +3.0% | +3.7% | +12.3% | +324% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 11 of 23 | −11.4% | +289% | +92.3% | +7.3% | +9.5% | −45.6% | −40.4% | −57.9% | +145% | −0.3% | +70.8% | +52.5% | +58.8% | +12.4% | −61.1% | +166% | +155% | −70.2% | −20.7% | +38.3% | −19.4% | +27.3% | +234% |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 9 of 19 | −3.6% | +266% | +84.9% | +26.5% | −10.0% | −57.0% | −14.1% | −60.7% | +81.5% | +12.2% | +32.9% | +86.4% | +33.8% | −7.0% | −58.8% | +74.0% | +183% | −54.5% | −19.6% | — | — | — | — |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 11 of 23 | −4.1% | +316% | +47.3% | +34.2% | −1.8% | −42.3% | −49.2% | −54.5% | +47.0% | −6.5% | +38.3% | +98.7% | +38.3% | +3.1% | −53.6% | +106% | +141% | −58.3% | −19.1% | +34.1% | −0.3% | −20.7% | +209% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 13 of 18 | +18.4% | +8.2% | +85.7% | −37.2% | −19.5% | +193% | +95.3% | −6.9% | +102% | +37.1% | −10.1% | +19.2% | +38.0% | −0.7% | +19.9% | +28.5% | +216% | −77.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 4 of 9 | −20.8% | +281% | +87.6% | +11.2% | −7.4% | −41.7% | −57.1% | −70.2% | +124% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XP XP Inc. | 2 of 6 | +39.6% | −52.3% | +79.6% | −46.6% | −27.6% | +3.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 2 of 7 | +61.0% | −49.8% | +42.7% | −66.7% | −53.9% | +66.5% | +82.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 6 of 23 | +48.8% | −30.4% | +32.6% | +12.1% | −17.3% | −20.3% | +27.7% | −2.5% | +23.6% | +64.5% | −41.8% | −15.5% | −17.5% | +0.3% | −24.1% | +7.8% | +122% | −56.0% | +74.8% | +43.3% | +52.7% | +33.6% | +117% |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 10 of 23 | +96.9% | −42.2% | +34.8% | −5.1% | −25.4% | −33.6% | +15.7% | +9.7% | +33.6% | +108% | −55.3% | +9.1% | −19.5% | +6.1% | −16.2% | +13.9% | +124% | −52.7% | +58.7% | +39.4% | +133% | +445% | +78.3% |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | 4 of 7 | +85.7% | −55.8% | +90.9% | −44.0% | −79.9% | +110% | +116% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 11 of 23 | +77.6% | +3.9% | +20.3% | +39.2% | −21.6% | +1.1% | −24.7% | −6.9% | +45.0% | +25.9% | −8.2% | −16.5% | −3.7% | +24.0% | −2.5% | +72.4% | +79.1% | −25.6% | −3.3% | +37.0% | +9.5% | +43.4% | +81.3% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 9 of 23 | +74.3% | +0.9% | +31.6% | +3.0% | −11.0% | −13.0% | −19.9% | −0.1% | +49.4% | +30.8% | −5.8% | −12.7% | −13.9% | +1.4% | −16.0% | +50.3% | +96.2% | −27.7% | +9.8% | +12.0% | +39.6% | +53.0% | +35.1% |
| AVAL Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores S.A. | 5 of 11 | +109% | −11.3% | +4.4% | −25.9% | −22.2% | −16.6% | +53.4% | −27.4% | +11.8% | +27.0% | −31.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 5 of 16 | +62.5% | −39.7% | +23.0% | +2.9% | −34.2% | −27.0% | +14.0% | +21.3% | +12.2% | +143% | −20.0% | −12.2% | −15.3% | −7.3% | −37.5% | +2.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | 2 of 4 | +61.6% | +24.4% | +105% | −56.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How ITUB has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ITUB's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ITUB's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2002, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of ITUB's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ITUB fell 66.3% from September 2014 to January 2016, while the S&P 500 slipped only 4.0%.
- The slowest recovery came after ITUB fell 62.1% from February 2019 to April 2020; it did not regain that peak until December 2023, four years later.
Green means ITUB fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ITUB fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −69.2% | −37.3% | May 2008 | Oct 2008 | 5 months | Oct 2009 | 12 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −66.3% | −4.0% | Sep 2014 | Jan 2016 | 16 months | Oct 2017 | 21 months |
| Dot-com bust | −65.7% | −26.5% | Apr 2002 | Sep 2002 | 5 months | Sep 2003 | 12 months |
| Covid crash | −62.1% | +6.6% | Feb 2019 | Apr 2020 | 14 months | Dec 2023 | 3.7 years |
| 2011 euro debt crisis | −46.9% | +11.9% | Nov 2010 | Jun 2012 | 19 months | Sep 2014 | 2.3 years |
How did ITUB do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ITUB, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: ITUB began trading on February 21, 2002, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- ITUB fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when ITUB fell 32.4% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, BCH held up best, falling less than ITUB in seven of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- ITUB began trading after the dot-com bust, but six of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was BSAC's 28.0%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ITUB.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITUB This pageItaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | — | −8.1% | −31.5% | −46.3% | −7.5% | −5.8% | −32.4% | −30.1% | −0.7% | −69.2% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | 3 of 9 | −9.8% | −44.6% | −70.1% | −15.3% | −4.8% | −38.7% | −17.7% | −1.7% | −63.4% | −75.1% |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 4 of 9 | −4.7% | −33.3% | −38.3% | −7.3% | −6.7% | −33.9% | −16.0% | −2.8% | −64.9% | −55.6% |
| BLX Bladex, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −3.8% | −23.9% | −48.4% | −26.7% | −4.6% | −27.8% | −19.7% | −2.5% | −63.2% | −94.3% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 1 of 9 | −14.5% | −44.7% | −58.1% | −27.3% | −8.5% | −22.1% | −47.8% | −1.5% | −82.4% | — |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 1 of 9 | −11.1% | −41.2% | −55.7% | −26.4% | −6.3% | −27.9% | −48.1% | −0.5% | −77.5% | — |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 2 of 9 | −16.6% | −41.8% | −50.5% | −23.9% | −8.5% | −30.1% | −47.1% | 0.0% | −80.2% | −95.7% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −7.2% | −51.6% | −39.1% | −30.3% | −8.8% | −31.9% | −39.5% | 0.0% | −89.5% | — |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 0 of 5 | −12.1% | −39.8% | −54.4% | −29.4% | −7.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| XP XP Inc. | 0 of 3 | −15.3% | −52.4% | −60.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 1 of 5 | −12.8% | −60.9% | −59.7% | −44.9% | −0.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 2 of 9 | −5.6% | −32.2% | −52.6% | −10.6% | −6.3% | −36.9% | −29.1% | −0.7% | −73.0% | — |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 3 of 9 | −6.9% | −30.2% | −54.5% | −7.6% | −6.3% | −44.3% | −25.1% | −0.8% | −69.0% | — |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | 0 of 3 | −10.2% | −59.0% | −55.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 7 of 9 | −2.1% | −27.0% | −29.8% | −10.5% | −2.7% | −15.2% | −25.4% | −1.4% | −57.6% | −37.3% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 6 of 9 | −6.0% | −37.0% | −38.1% | −12.4% | −4.5% | −22.6% | −29.0% | −1.2% | −48.4% | −28.0% |
| AVAL Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores S.A. | 3 of 6 | −4.2% | −53.4% | −61.9% | −28.0% | −4.5% | −29.1% | — | — | — | — |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 1 of 8 | −8.6% | −37.6% | −50.4% | −13.9% | −6.2% | −31.4% | −30.5% | −4.0% | — | — |
| NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | 0 of 2 | −10.0% | −67.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does ITUB move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ITUB with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, ITUB captured 66% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 58% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.65. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only BCH and MELI had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ITUB's 1.15, out of 14 popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ITUB's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITUB This pageItaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 66% | 58% | 1.15 | 0.65 |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 45% | 19% | 2.41 | 0.36 |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 135% | 111% | 1.21 | 1.44 |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 88% | 82% | 1.07 | 0.88 |
| BLX Bladex, Inc. | 91% | 90% | 1.01 | 1.07 |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 66% | 65% | 1.01 | 0.66 |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | 119% | 133% | 0.90 | 0.99 |
| EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 69% | 95% | 0.73 | 0.83 |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 140% | 234% | 0.60 | 1.52 |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 62% | 103% | 0.60 | 0.72 |
| AVAL Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores S.A. | 89% | 156% | 0.57 | 1.03 |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 113% | 202% | 0.56 | 1.36 |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 56% | 102% | 0.55 | 0.74 |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 98% | 191% | 0.51 | 1.14 |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 95% | 224% | 0.42 | 1.51 |
What diversifies ITUB?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ITUB's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ITUB with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ITUB into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+23.7% for ITUB alone, +25.5% for the mix).
- SMH made money in six of the eight calendar years in which ITUB lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ITUB over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.32 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ITUB lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ITUB and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2021 | 2020 | 2015 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. (this page) | 1.00 | +221% | 0.86 | −24.2% | −22.8% | −30.5% | −44.0% | −5.2% | −6.8% | −19.1% | −38.8% | 33.8% | +23.7% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.32 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +17.8% | −9.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 27.7% | +23.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.14 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +18.0% | +3.9% | +7.7% | +41.3% | +19.6% | −16.1% | −20.8% | 27.5% | +25.5% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.30 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +23.1% | −13.4% | −25.3% | +16.6% | — | — | — | 28.1% | +23.0% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.36 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +19.6% | −6.5% | −0.3% | +23.8% | +9.6% | — | — | 28.2% | +22.3% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.11 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +42.1% | +55.5% | −0.3% | +33.4% | +8.6% | +6.8% | −44.7% | 28.7% | +28.3% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.24 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | +19.6% | +2.1% | +4.1% | +26.4% | +20.9% | — | — | 27.7% | +22.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.11 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −4.2% | +24.8% | −10.7% | −28.3% | +6.6% | +9.6% | +4.9% | 27.6% | +23.9% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.19 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +22.7% | +28.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 28.1% | +24.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2021 | 2020 | 2015 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. (this page) | 1.00 | +221% | 0.86 | −24.2% | −22.8% | −30.5% | −44.0% | −5.2% | −6.8% | −19.1% | −38.8% | 33.8% | +23.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.31 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | −0.4% | +10.1% | +12.6% | +66.0% | +3.8% | +8.1% | −39.6% | 29.1% | +27.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.09 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +37.9% | −2.4% | −6.0% | +27.6% | +11.2% | −24.4% | −20.5% | 30.4% | +41.8% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.16 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +89.0% | +6.7% | +67.7% | +61.7% | +15.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | 29.8% | +37.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.16 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +44.2% | +27.1% | −4.5% | +67.7% | +25.6% | +11.8% | −40.4% | 28.3% | +27.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.28 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +61.0% | −27.4% | +17.4% | +48.6% | +94.3% | — | — | 29.5% | +29.8% |
Common questions
What was ITUB's worst drawdown?
ITUB's deepest decline since it began trading in 2002 was 69.2%, from May to October 2008. It took 12 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were ITUB's best and worst years?
Over 23 full calendar years, ITUB's best year was 2003, when it returned 126%. Its worst was 2015, with a return of -44.0%.
Is there a better investment than ITUB?
Among ITUB's popular alternatives, BAP and BLX earned more than ITUB with less volatility over the past 5 years. BAP returned 30.8% a year at 30.2% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 33.8%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MFG (banks) and SMFG (banks) earned more than ITUB with less volatility over the past 5 years. MFG returned 33.6% a year at 30.6% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 33.8%.
Is ITUB more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ITUB's volatility over the past 5 years was 33.8%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ITUB's return lands within 33.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ITUB's Sharpe ratio?
ITUB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.86, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ITUB earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ITUB with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ITUB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.22 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ITUB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ITUB holding.
What are the best alternatives to ITUB?
Of the 18 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed ITUB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CIB and BAP.
Did ITUB outperform the S&P 500?
ITUB finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 12 of 23 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +79.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ITUB do in stock market crashes?
ITUB fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when ITUB fell 32.4% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies ITUB?
These had a low correlation with ITUB over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.32), DXJ (correlation 0.14) and EMLP (correlation 0.30); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.31), CLS (correlation 0.09) and FIX (correlation 0.16). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ITUB's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ITUB's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.