Relative Intelligence · Banks

How NU compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on NU alone. It places NU (Nu Holdings Ltd.) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where NU stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: NU's full trading record, from December 2021 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowNU has gone against the market, falling 0.1% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, ITUB (Itaú Unibanco Holding) rose 5.8% and GGAL (Grupo Financiero Galicia) fell 24.7%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?NU held up far better than its industry: it rose 7.9% over the past 3 months while the financials sector ETF XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 0.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. NU rose 7.3% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, NU fell 2.1% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (84.7% against 89.3%). NU led its bank peers in 2023, then fell behind ITUB (Itaú Unibanco Holding) and BBD (Banco Bradesco) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termNU turned $10,000 into $18,500 over the past 3 years, against $18,900 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 67.5% off NU, against 24.5% for the S&P 500, and more than bank peers such as ITUB (Itaú Unibanco Holding, 31.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 3 years, NU's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.66: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.2 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.8 times as much. That said, against the S&P 500, NU has a correlation of 0.19 over 3 years, less closely than 74% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- BAP (Credicorp), ITUB (Itaú Unibanco Holding) and CIB (Grupo Cibest) earned more than NU with less volatility over the past 3 years. BAP returned 55.3% a year at 28.1% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 42.4%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- RY (Royal Bank of Canada, banks) and CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, banks) earned more than NU with less volatility over the past 3 years. RY returned 39.7% a year at 16.9% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 42.4%.
- Whole market
- 664 of the 3,928 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NU with less volatility over the past 3 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and AMZN (Amazon.com).
How much would $10,000 in NU have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in NU over the past 4 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of NU over the same span and NU's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: NU began trading on December 9, 2021, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 4 years of NU's record, starting at the end of September 2022.
- $10,000 invested in NU at the end of September 2022 would have grown to $28,771 by September 2026, more than the $22,487 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of NU, and HOOD finished highest, at $111,384.
From the end of September 2022 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 608 of the 3,774 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NU; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- HOOD$111,384+1,014% total · +82.7% a year
- BMA$58,556+486% total · +55.6% a year
- BBAR$56,114+461% total · +53.9% a year
- CIB$55,767+458% total · +53.7% a year
- SUPV$42,071+321% total · +43.2% a year
- BAP$38,711+287% total · +40.3% a year
- NU$28,771+188% total · +30.2% a year
- ITUB$23,629+136% total · +24.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$22,487+125% total · +22.5% a year
- BBD$13,269+32.7% total · +7.3% a year
NU at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: NU began trading on December 9, 2021, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- NU's deepest decline since it began trading in 2021 was 72.1%, from December 2021 to June 2022. It took 21 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over four full calendar years, NU's best was 2023, when it returned 105%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 56.6%. It lost money in one of those years.
- NU is 19.6% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $73B
- Industry
- Banks - Regional
- Price history from
- December 2021
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −2.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +84.7%+22.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +105%2023
- Worst calendar year
- −56.6%2022
- Losing years
- 1 of 4full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 42.4%typical yearly swing, 3 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.70return per unit of risk, 3 years
- Worst decline ever
- −72.1%Dec 2021 to Jun 2022
- From its all-time high
- −19.6%below the peak
NU against the whole market
Where NU ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does NU rank among all stocks?
This section ranks NU on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how NU stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- NU lands in the broad middle of the market on every measure here. NU's 3-year return ranks in the top 36% of the 3,017 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | NU | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −2.1% | 2,066 of 3,287 | bottom 38% |
| 3-year return | +84.7% | 1,075 of 3,017 | top 36% |
| Volatility, 3 years | 42.4% | 1,679 of 3,017 | bottom 45% |
| Sharpe ratio, 3 years | 0.70 | 1,289 of 3,017 | top 43% |
What has beaten NU on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 3 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). NU sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than NU with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 430 stocks and 234 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than NU over the past 3 years with smaller price swings. That is 17% of the 3,928 screened.
- Among those with at least half NU's swings, TIGO has the best return for its risk: 85.7% a year at 34.4% volatility, 19% less than NU's 42.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.99 against 0.70 for NU.
- Among NU's popular alternatives, CIB, BAP and ITUB are in the region. CIB earned 70.7% a year against 22.7% a year for NU, at 29.9% volatility, 29% less than NU's 42.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 3 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to NU; faint dots are 89 more of the 664 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,928 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than NU?
Investments that beat NU over the past 3 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among NU's popular alternatives, BAP, ITUB and CIB earned more than NU with less volatility over the past 3 years. BAP returned 55.3% a year at 28.1% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 42.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RY (banks) and CM (banks) earned more than NU with less volatility over the past 3 years. RY returned 39.7% a year at 16.9% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 42.4%.
- Across the whole market, 664 of the 3,928 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NU with less volatility over the past 3 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and AMZN.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat NU over the past 3 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks NU's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than NU follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 3 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than NU's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× NU's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 3 years. Green marks a better figure than NU's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 3 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 3Y returntotal | Corr. with NU?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +22.7% | 42.4% | 0.70 | −72.1% | +84.7% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +23.7% | 15.2% | 1.48 | −33.7% | +89.3% | 0.19 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 5 shownThe investments people most often weigh against NU. 5 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +55.3% | 28.1% | 1.72 | −59.2% | +275% | 0.20 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +35.1% | 31.6% | 1.12 | −62.1% | +147% | 0.44 | — | ||
CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +70.7% | 29.9% | 1.95 | −70.4% | +398% | 0.40 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +24.0% | 36.9% | 0.77 | −67.7% | +90.7% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +21.2% | 20.4% | 1.05 | −36.4% | +78.2% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus NU's specific themes. 84 of 138 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +39.7% | 16.9% | 2.08 | −40.0% | +173% | 0.23 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +53.4% | 19.8% | 2.27 | −47.3% | +261% | 0.22 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +55.0% | 21.2% | 2.19 | −50.5% | +272% | 0.14 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +35.7% | 23.1% | 1.45 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.37 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +23.0% | 26.5% | 0.92 | −51.1% | +86.2% | 0.25 | — | ||
QTWOQ2 Holdings, Inc. · Application Software · Digital Banking theme | Higher return, similar volatility | +28.1% | 43.0% | 0.79 | −85.8% | +110% | 0.20 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,005 of 3,771 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +35.4% | 30.3% | 1.16 | −44.6% | +148% | 0.18 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +68.9% | 40.1% | 1.52 | −56.6% | +382% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +25.8% | 26.8% | 0.99 | −38.5% | +99.0% | -0.12 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +28.0% | 32.2% | 0.93 | −56.1% | +110% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +32.0% | 23.3% | 1.31 | −25.7% | +130% | 0.36 | — | ||
PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +25.6% | 13.2% | 1.80 | −41.3% | +98.1% | 0.24 | 0.56% | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +23.4% | 15.4% | 1.45 | −35.0% | +87.9% | 0.19 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +42.3% | 43.4% | 1.04 | −56.9% | +188% | 0.18 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for NU
- Annual return
- NU returned 22.7% a year over the past 3 years with dividends reinvested, against 23.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $18,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- NU's volatility over the past 3 years was 42.4%, 2.8 times the S&P 500's 15.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NU's return lands within 42.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- NU's Sharpe ratio over the past 3 years was 0.70, against 1.48 for the S&P 500, so NU earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- NU's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 72.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 72.1% fall takes a 258% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 3 years, NU's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.19 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NU instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NU holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 664 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than NU with less volatility
Out of 3,928 tested over 3 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 3Y return | Corr. with NU | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +35.4% | 30.3% | 1.16 | −44.6% | +148% | 0.18 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +68.9% | 40.1% | 1.52 | −56.6% | +382% | 0.17 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +25.8% | 26.8% | 0.99 | −38.5% | +99.0% | -0.12 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +23.8% | 14.8% | 1.52 | −34.0% | +89.7% | 0.19 | 0.03% | |
| 5 | Same or nearby category | +39.7% | 16.9% | 2.08 | −40.0% | +173% | 0.23 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +28.0% | 32.2% | 0.93 | −56.1% | +110% | 0.17 | — | |
| 7 | Same or nearby category | +53.4% | 19.8% | 2.27 | −47.3% | +261% | 0.22 | — | |
| 8 | Same or nearby category | +55.0% | 21.2% | 2.19 | −50.5% | +272% | 0.14 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +32.0% | 23.3% | 1.31 | −25.7% | +130% | 0.36 | — | |
| 10 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +25.6% | 13.2% | 1.80 | −41.3% | +98.1% | 0.24 | 0.56% |
| 11 | Whole market | +30.9% | 35.5% | 0.94 | −34.5% | +124% | 0.35 | — | |
| 12 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +24.4% | 10.6% | 2.12 | −32.4% | +92.3% | 0.03 | 0.40% |
| 13 | Whole market | +27.2% | 20.5% | 1.28 | −35.1% | +106% | 0.08 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | Whole market | +44.4% | 21.1% | 1.86 | −63.3% | +201% | 0.18 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +29.7% | 24.9% | 1.18 | −45.1% | +118% | 0.19 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +41.4% | 23.9% | 1.58 | −52.0% | +183% | 0.18 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +44.7% | 32.6% | 1.30 | −43.4% | +203% | -0.03 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +34.7% | 24.7% | 1.34 | −42.9% | +144% | 0.10 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +29.6% | 26.9% | 1.10 | −42.0% | +118% | -0.16 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +60.2% | 36.2% | 1.50 | −37.5% | +311% | 0.22 | — | |
| 21 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Popular alternative | +55.3% | 28.1% | 1.72 | −59.2% | +275% | 0.20 | — |
| 22 | Whole market | +33.6% | 24.7% | 1.30 | −35.1% | +138% | 0.00 | 0.09% | |
| 23 | Whole market | +32.5% | 27.2% | 1.18 | −49.6% | +133% | 0.30 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +35.3% | 22.3% | 1.48 | −56.1% | +148% | 0.10 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +30.3% | 26.4% | 1.14 | −30.5% | +121% | -0.16 | — | |
| 26 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +27.5% | 13.7% | 1.86 | −36.9% | +107% | 0.17 | 0.05% |
| 27 | Whole market | +42.5% | 23.0% | 1.66 | −57.5% | +189% | 0.11 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +29.7% | 21.6% | 1.32 | −53.7% | +118% | 0.02 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +27.2% | 21.5% | 1.23 | −26.4% | +106% | 0.25 | 0.40% | |
| 30 | Whole market | +35.7% | 35.6% | 1.04 | −33.6% | +150% | -0.02 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +47.3% | 28.9% | 1.50 | −46.4% | +220% | -0.12 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +37.1% | 22.3% | 1.54 | −46.3% | +158% | 0.15 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +27.0% | 37.0% | 0.83 | −33.4% | +105% | 0.06 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +37.7% | 28.2% | 1.28 | −54.7% | +161% | 0.26 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +41.4% | 31.0% | 1.28 | −64.2% | +183% | -0.06 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +57.9% | 38.7% | 1.38 | −54.2% | +293% | 0.16 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +33.1% | 18.9% | 1.61 | −41.6% | +136% | 0.20 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +24.6% | 35.4% | 0.81 | −41.1% | +93.5% | 0.17 | — | |
| 39 | FGDFirst Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund · International | Whole market | +25.5% | 13.0% | 1.83 | −44.8% | +97.7% | 0.17 | 0.55% |
| 40 | Whole market | +34.9% | 22.9% | 1.43 | −50.8% | +145% | 0.15 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +32.1% | 26.8% | 1.18 | −38.1% | +131% | 0.02 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +36.4% | 27.5% | 1.28 | −40.5% | +154% | 0.08 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +53.7% | 39.3% | 1.30 | −45.5% | +263% | 0.09 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +42.8% | 25.3% | 1.54 | −46.1% | +191% | 0.11 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +31.7% | 21.7% | 1.39 | −55.1% | +129% | -0.06 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +30.1% | 23.0% | 1.27 | −61.4% | +120% | -0.05 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +29.5% | 25.8% | 1.14 | −61.3% | +117% | 0.10 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +25.4% | 13.7% | 1.73 | −21.8% | +97.2% | 0.18 | 0.33% | |
| 49 | Whole market | +57.4% | 37.2% | 1.41 | −45.3% | +290% | 0.08 | 0.35% | |
| 50 | CLSEConvergence Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +29.1% | 13.8% | 1.93 | −16.4% | +115% | 0.27 | 1.52% |
| 51 | Whole market | +37.3% | 30.0% | 1.21 | −57.4% | +159% | 0.07 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +26.9% | 34.8% | 0.86 | −44.5% | +104% | 0.13 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +42.4% | 25.1% | 1.54 | −64.1% | +189% | 0.23 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +27.2% | 15.7% | 1.62 | −34.7% | +106% | 0.20 | 0.26% | |
| 55 | Whole market | +35.6% | 22.1% | 1.50 | −42.0% | +149% | 0.00 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +24.6% | 19.1% | 1.25 | −32.9% | +93.3% | 0.03 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +37.5% | 30.5% | 1.20 | −44.0% | +160% | 0.13 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +25.8% | 19.4% | 1.29 | −34.5% | +99.2% | 0.18 | 0.04% | |
| 59 | Whole market | +28.3% | 24.5% | 1.15 | −51.4% | +111% | 0.16 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +46.2% | 32.1% | 1.35 | −53.6% | +213% | -0.01 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +25.5% | 27.8% | 0.96 | −54.7% | +97.6% | 0.32 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +29.3% | 20.3% | 1.38 | −48.8% | +116% | -0.11 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +29.2% | 24.1% | 1.19 | −41.4% | +116% | 0.11 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +38.9% | 34.7% | 1.13 | −59.9% | +168% | 0.16 | — | |
| 65 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +24.4% | 14.4% | 1.60 | −43.2% | +92.4% | 0.17 | 0.31% |
| 66 | Whole market | +43.6% | 34.4% | 1.23 | −54.6% | +196% | 0.06 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +46.2% | 39.1% | 1.18 | −46.7% | +212% | 0.04 | — | |
| 68 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +58.4% | 35.1% | 1.49 | −35.4% | +297% | 0.10 | — |
| 69 | Whole market | +25.6% | 22.9% | 1.12 | −41.6% | +98.1% | 0.13 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +25.2% | 18.6% | 1.31 | −50.8% | +96.3% | 0.00 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +38.2% | 39.1% | 1.02 | −63.3% | +164% | 0.11 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +39.6% | 36.5% | 1.10 | −42.6% | +172% | -0.11 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +36.8% | 39.4% | 1.00 | −53.9% | +156% | 0.23 | — | |
| 74 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +25.1% | 15.2% | 1.56 | −40.2% | +95.8% | 0.13 | 0.25% |
| 75 | Whole market | +24.4% | 23.9% | 1.04 | −30.7% | +92.7% | 0.13 | — | |
| 76 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +29.7% | 16.2% | 1.70 | −43.0% | +118% | 0.09 | 0.36% |
| 77 | Same or nearby category | +35.7% | 23.1% | 1.45 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.37 | — | |
| 78 | HIGThe Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +26.9% | 20.3% | 1.28 | −57.6% | +105% | 0.23 | — |
| 79 | Whole market | +31.6% | 25.9% | 1.20 | −42.5% | +128% | 0.12 | — | |
| 80 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +36.9% | 22.1% | 1.54 | −30.9% | +156% | 0.16 | 0.13% |
| 81 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +23.7% | 14.8% | 1.52 | −19.5% | +89.4% | 0.16 | 0.15% |
| 82 | Same or nearby category | +44.4% | 24.4% | 1.64 | −62.3% | +201% | -0.16 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +24.0% | 29.1% | 0.89 | −47.7% | +90.6% | -0.07 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +44.0% | 38.8% | 1.14 | −58.1% | +198% | 0.01 | — | |
| 85 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +34.5% | 23.7% | 1.38 | −49.7% | +143% | 0.29 | — |
| 86 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +54.3% | 39.4% | 1.31 | −48.0% | +267% | 0.26 | — |
| 87 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +45.5% | 30.6% | 1.38 | −54.6% | +208% | -0.04 | — |
| 88 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +35.1% | 23.8% | 1.39 | −59.3% | +147% | 0.14 | — |
| 89 | Same or nearby category | +34.1% | 18.3% | 1.70 | −42.0% | +141% | -0.03 | — | |
| 90 | Same or nearby category | +37.9% | 18.2% | 1.87 | −46.9% | +162% | 0.13 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +24.5% | 33.8% | 0.82 | −57.2% | +92.9% | 0.13 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +29.8% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −61.2% | +119% | 0.18 | — | |
| 93 | ERICTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) · Communications Equipment | Whole market | +38.3% | 34.4% | 1.12 | −66.6% | +164% | 0.06 | — |
| 94 | CGGRCapital Group Growth ETF · US Large-Cap Growth | Whole market | +25.4% | 19.6% | 1.26 | −28.9% | +97.0% | 0.22 | 0.39% |
| 95 | VFLOVictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +30.8% | 16.4% | 1.73 | −17.8% | +124% | 0.15 | 0.44% |
| 96 | RLRalph Lauren Corporation · Apparel & Footwear | Whole market | +50.5% | 35.8% | 1.33 | −55.1% | +241% | 0.08 | — |
| 97 | Whole market | +28.0% | 28.2% | 1.02 | −62.2% | +109% | 0.21 | — | |
| 98 | AVEMAvantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +24.1% | 19.8% | 1.20 | −36.0% | +91.0% | 0.02 | 0.33% |
| 99 | EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +27.2% | 21.1% | 1.25 | −42.8% | +106% | 0.04 | 0.25% |
| 100 | Whole market | +24.6% | 28.6% | 0.92 | −57.7% | +93.4% | -0.09 | — |
NU against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against NU, compared period by period and year by year.
How do NU's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 3 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at NU, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Four of the 19 popular alternatives, led by CIB, BAP and ITUB, were both more rewarding and calmer than NU over the past 3 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 3 years, NU returned 22.7% a year, less than the S&P 500's 23.7%, with higher volatility (42.4% against 15.2%).
Green points earned more than NU with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | +121% | 69.0% |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | +70.7% | 29.9% |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | +58.3% | 64.5% |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | +56.4% | 70.6% |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | +55.4% | 28.1% |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | +55.3% | 79.9% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | +52.4% | 62.8% |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | +35.1% | 31.6% |
| SOFI SoFi Technologies, Inc. | +25.8% | 59.1% |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | +24.0% | 36.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +23.7% | 15.2% |
| NU This pageNu Holdings Ltd. | +22.7% | 42.4% |
| INTR Inter & Co, Inc. | +21.7% | 49.5% |
| V Visa Inc. | +21.2% | 20.4% |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | +20.1% | 46.5% |
| XP XP Inc. | +18.1% | 46.6% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | +18.0% | 20.5% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | +17.1% | 38.0% |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | +13.7% | 48.4% |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | +5.8% | 32.1% |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | +2.7% | 38.6% |
Has NU consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares NU with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over six periods from one month to three years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than NU helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Four of the 19 popular alternatives, led by ITUB, BBD and CIB, outperformed NU in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 1 of 1 long-term timeframes.
- ITUB, BBD and CIB outperformed NU in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- CIB, BAP and ITUB earned more for the risk they took than NU (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than NU over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 1 of 1 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 3 years | Fund | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| NU Nu Holdings Ltd. (this page) | — | +7.3% | +7.9% | −0.1% | −11.3% | −2.1% | +84.7% | 42.4% | 0.70 | −72.1% | — | $73B | — |
| ITUB QualifiedItaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 5/5 short1/1 longAll-weather | +14.8% | +16.7% | +5.8% | +37.2% | +46.3% | +147% | 31.6% | 1.12 | −62.1% | — | $107B | — |
| BBD QualifiedBanco Bradesco S.A. | 5/5 short1/1 longAll-weather | +18.3% | +15.9% | +1.7% | +29.1% | +31.6% | +90.7% | 36.9% | 0.77 | −67.7% | — | $43B | — |
| CIB QualifiedGrupo Cibest S.A. | 4/5 short1/1 longAll-weather | 0.0% | +20.5% | +32.5% | +59.5% | +81.1% | +398% | 29.9% | 1.95 | −70.4% | — | $23B | — |
| BAP QualifiedCredicorp Ltd. | 3/5 short1/1 long | +0.1% | +1.0% | +21.9% | +42.9% | +61.4% | +275% | 28.1% | 1.72 | −59.2% | — | $31B | — |
| HOOD Financial - Capital MarketsRobinhood Markets, Inc. | 1/5 short1/1 long | −20.3% | −1.1% | +7.6% | −14.8% | −27.7% | +976% | 69.0% | 1.50 | −90.2% | — | $78B | — |
| BMA Banks - RegionalBanco Macro S.A. | 1/5 short1/1 long | −15.8% | −30.1% | −22.1% | −25.9% | +25.7% | +297% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −91.7% | — | $4.0B | — |
| BBAR Banks - RegionalBanco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 1/5 short1/1 long | −12.5% | −35.9% | −24.8% | −29.0% | +35.7% | +283% | 70.6% | 0.98 | −91.6% | — | $2.6B | — |
| SUPV Banks - RegionalGrupo Supervielle S.A. | 1/5 short1/1 long | −10.5% | −25.9% | −27.9% | −37.9% | +16.3% | +274% | 79.9% | 0.93 | −96.0% | — | $676M | — |
| GGAL Banks - RegionalGrupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 1/5 short1/1 long | −15.0% | −28.7% | −24.7% | −31.9% | +14.1% | +254% | 62.8% | 0.98 | −91.7% | — | $6.0B | — |
| SOFI Financial - Credit ServicesSoFi Technologies, Inc. | 0/5 short1/1 long | −13.5% | −13.7% | −24.7% | −46.5% | −48.8% | +99.2% | 59.1% | 0.69 | −83.3% | — | $19B | — |
| V Financial - Credit ServicesVisa Inc. | 5/5 short0/1 long | +9.9% | +13.0% | +30.0% | +18.0% | +19.0% | +78.2% | 20.4% | 1.05 | −36.4% | — | $759B | — |
| PAGS Specialty Business ServicesPagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 5/5 short0/1 long | +23.8% | +29.9% | +9.2% | +29.2% | +38.4% | +73.1% | 46.5% | 0.63 | −90.0% | — | $3.2B | — |
| XP Financial - Capital MarketsXP Inc. | 5/5 short0/1 long | +50.8% | +86.5% | +52.5% | +96.2% | +83.7% | +64.5% | 46.6% | 0.59 | −79.2% | — | $16B | — |
| MA Financial - Credit ServicesMastercard Incorporated | 5/5 short0/1 long | +9.5% | +13.5% | +20.5% | +10.9% | +10.3% | +64.3% | 20.5% | 0.91 | −41.0% | — | $543B | — |
| STNE Software - InfrastructureStoneCo Ltd. | 3/5 short0/1 long | +24.3% | +8.5% | −5.1% | −0.6% | −21.7% | +46.8% | 48.4% | 0.51 | −92.3% | — | $2.8B | — |
| PYPL Financial - Credit ServicesPayPal Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short0/1 long | +8.6% | +0.8% | +11.7% | −0.9% | −16.5% | +8.2% | 38.6% | 0.27 | −87.3% | — | $49B | — |
| INTR Banks - RegionalInter & Co, Inc. | 2/5 short0/1 long | +30.3% | +29.2% | −11.8% | −13.1% | −21.3% | +80.1% | 49.5% | 0.65 | −68.3% | — | $3.2B | — |
| MELI Specialty RetailMercadoLibre, Inc. | 2/5 short0/1 long | +3.2% | +2.6% | +0.5% | −4.8% | −10.6% | +60.7% | 38.0% | 0.61 | −69.1% | — | $95B | — |
| BSBR Banks - RegionalBanco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 2/5 short0/1 long | −4.4% | +6.0% | −10.8% | −6.8% | +6.6% | +18.6% | 32.1% | 0.34 | −70.6% | — | $42B | — |
How did NU do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2022, along with where NU ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with NU and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: NU began trading on December 9, 2021, so the table starts with 2022, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- NU finished ahead of the S&P 500 in two of its four full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, BAP came out ahead of NU most often, in three of the four years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, NU finished in the top quarter in one of four years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of NU; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places NU among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of NU | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NU This pageNu Holdings Ltd. | — | +61.6% | +24.4% | +105% | −56.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 1 of 4 | 10 of 20 | 9 of 20 | 3 of 20 | 16 of 19 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1 of 4 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 2 of 4 | +79.3% | −24.2% | +54.5% | +30.0% |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 2 of 4 | +96.9% | −42.2% | +34.8% | −5.1% |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | 2 of 4 | +122% | +13.6% | +20.6% | −2.0% |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 3 of 4 | +65.4% | +31.4% | +16.3% | +14.6% |
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 3 of 4 | +204% | +192% | +56.5% | −54.2% |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 2 of 4 | −3.6% | +266% | +84.9% | +26.5% |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 2 of 4 | −4.1% | +316% | +47.3% | +34.2% |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 2 of 4 | −20.8% | +281% | +87.6% | +11.2% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 2 of 4 | −11.4% | +289% | +92.3% | +7.3% |
| SOFI SoFi Technologies, Inc. | 3 of 4 | +70.0% | +54.8% | +116% | −70.8% |
| V Visa Inc. | 1 of 4 | +11.8% | +22.3% | +26.3% | −3.4% |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 0 of 4 | +61.0% | −49.8% | +42.7% | −66.7% |
| XP XP Inc. | 1 of 4 | +39.6% | −52.3% | +79.6% | −46.6% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 1 of 4 | +9.0% | +24.2% | +23.4% | −2.7% |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | 2 of 4 | +85.7% | −55.8% | +90.9% | −44.0% |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −31.4% | +39.0% | −13.8% | −62.2% |
| INTR Inter & Co, Inc. | 2 of 3 | +104% | −23.6% | +134% | — |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 1 of 4 | +18.4% | +8.2% | +85.7% | −37.2% |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 1 of 4 | +62.5% | −39.7% | +23.0% | +2.9% |
Risk and diversification
How NU has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were NU's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents NU's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2021, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: NU began trading on December 9, 2021, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of NU's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: NU fell 38.2% from January to June 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 6.6%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 21 months, after NU fell 72.1% from December 2021 to June 2022.
Green means NU fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | NU fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −72.1% | −21.6% | Dec 2021 | Jun 2022 | 6 months | Mar 2024 | 21 months |
| No named crash | −39.6% | −15.1% | Nov 2024 | Apr 2025 | 5 months | Sep 2025 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −38.2% | +6.6% | Jan 2026 | Jun 2026 | 5 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −21.1% | −8.4% | Jul 2024 | Aug 2024 | 1 month | Aug 2024 | Under a month |
| No named crash | −14.4% | −5.0% | Mar 2024 | Apr 2024 | 1 month | Jun 2024 | 2 months |
How did NU do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far NU, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: NU began trading on December 9, 2021, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- NU fell further than the S&P 500 in all two crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when NU fell 67.5% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, ITUB held up best, falling less than NU in all two crashes they both traded through.
- NU began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but nine of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MA's 62.7%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than NU.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NU This pageNu Holdings Ltd. | — | −10.0% | −67.5% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 2 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 2 of 2 | −8.1% | −31.5% | −46.3% | −7.5% | −5.8% | −32.4% | −30.1% | −0.7% | −69.2% | — |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 2 of 2 | −6.9% | −30.2% | −54.5% | −7.6% | −6.3% | −44.3% | −25.1% | −0.8% | −69.0% | — |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | 1 of 2 | −9.8% | −44.6% | −70.1% | −15.3% | −4.8% | −38.7% | −17.7% | −1.7% | −63.4% | −75.1% |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 2 of 2 | −4.7% | −33.3% | −38.3% | −7.3% | −6.7% | −33.9% | −16.0% | −2.8% | −64.9% | −55.6% |
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −6.8% | −60.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 1 of 2 | −11.1% | −41.2% | −55.7% | −26.4% | −6.3% | −27.9% | −48.1% | −0.5% | −77.5% | — |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 1 of 2 | −16.6% | −41.8% | −50.5% | −23.9% | −8.5% | −30.1% | −47.1% | 0.0% | −80.2% | −95.7% |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 1 of 2 | −12.1% | −39.8% | −54.4% | −29.4% | −7.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 1 of 2 | −14.5% | −44.7% | −58.1% | −27.3% | −8.5% | −22.1% | −47.8% | −1.5% | −82.4% | — |
| SOFI SoFi Technologies, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −15.2% | −67.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| V Visa Inc. | 2 of 2 | −3.5% | −24.1% | −36.4% | −19.1% | −5.8% | −15.8% | −11.5% | −0.8% | — | — |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 1 of 2 | −12.8% | −60.9% | −59.7% | −44.9% | −0.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| XP XP Inc. | 1 of 2 | −15.3% | −52.4% | −60.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 2 of 2 | −4.0% | −28.2% | −41.0% | −21.9% | −5.8% | −20.4% | −13.8% | −3.1% | −62.7% | — |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | 1 of 2 | −10.2% | −59.0% | −55.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −4.4% | −63.8% | −31.2% | −16.7% | −5.6% | −21.6% | — | — | — | — |
| INTR Inter & Co, Inc. | 0 of 1 | −13.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −7.2% | −51.6% | −39.1% | −30.3% | −8.8% | −31.9% | −39.5% | 0.0% | −89.5% | — |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 2 of 2 | −8.6% | −37.6% | −50.4% | −13.9% | −6.2% | −31.4% | −30.5% | −4.0% | — | — |
How closely does NU move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares NU with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 3 years.
- Eight of the 15 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than NU's 0.65, led by GGAL, V and BMA.
- BAP took just -71% of the S&P 500's losses, against 182% for NU, while still keeping 127% of its gains.
- Over the past 3 years, NU captured 118% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 182% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.66. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 3 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than NU's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NU This pageNu Holdings Ltd. | 118% | 182% | 0.65 | 0.66 |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 140% | 11% | 13.04 | 0.71 |
| V Visa Inc. | 55% | 5% | 10.42 | 0.55 |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 177% | 55% | 3.25 | 1.25 |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 163% | 77% | 2.11 | 1.70 |
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 363% | 223% | 1.63 | 3.60 |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 67% | 43% | 1.55 | 0.52 |
| INTR Inter & Co, Inc. | 55% | 63% | 0.87 | 0.47 |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 66% | 91% | 0.73 | 0.52 |
| SOFI SoFi Technologies, Inc. | 147% | 231% | 0.64 | 1.93 |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 77% | 143% | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 43% | 86% | 0.51 | 0.25 |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | 21% | 50% | 0.42 | 1.01 |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 62% | 159% | 0.39 | 1.13 |
| XP XP Inc. | 25% | 84% | 0.30 | 0.71 |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 56% | 233% | 0.24 | 0.87 |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 81% | -28% | — | 0.42 |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | 170% | -30% | — | 0.14 |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 127% | -71% | — | 0.28 |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 145% | -35% | — | 0.62 |
What diversifies NU?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with NU's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing NU with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in NU into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 3 years and raised its annual return (+20.4% for NU alone, +22.5% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, CLSE and SEIV have moved largely independently of NU over the past 3 years, with correlations of 0.27 or lower, and each still earned a positive 3-year return.
- In 2022, the one year NU lost money (-56.6%), LVHI returned +3.8%.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 3 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which NU lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% NU and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 3Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NU Nu Holdings Ltd. (this page) | 1.00 | +84.7% | 0.70 | −56.6% | 43.9% | +20.4% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.03 | +92.3% | 2.12 | +3.8% | 35.2% | +22.5% |
| CLSE Broad MarketConvergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.27 | +115% | 1.93 | — | 35.8% | +23.8% |
| SEIV Broad MarketSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF | 0.16 | +114% | 1.81 | — | 35.6% | +23.4% |
| INCM Multi-AssetFranklin Income Focus ETF | 0.09 | +44.3% | 1.74 | — | 35.3% | +20.2% |
| CGDV Dividend & IncomeCapital Group Dividend Value ETF | 0.18 | +97.2% | 1.73 | — | 35.6% | +22.9% |
| FMAR Multi-AssetFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 0.08 | +54.4% | 1.72 | −5.5% | 35.3% | +21.0% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.03 | +136% | 1.71 | −14.2% | 35.5% | +24.8% |
| AVDV InternationalAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 0.09 | +118% | 1.70 | −11.5% | 35.5% | +23.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 3Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NU Nu Holdings Ltd. (this page) | 1.00 | +84.7% | 0.70 | −56.6% | 43.9% | +20.4% |
| CM Banks - DiversifiedCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 0.22 | +261% | 2.27 | −26.8% | 36.5% | +27.4% |
| BNY Investment - Banking & Investment ServicesBank of New York Mellon Corp | 0.14 | +272% | 2.19 | −19.1% | 35.8% | +28.4% |
| RY Banks - DiversifiedRoyal Bank of Canada | 0.23 | +173% | 2.08 | −8.0% | 36.3% | +25.1% |
| TIGO Telecommunications ServicesMillicom International Cellular S.A. | 0.35 | +540% | 1.99 | −55.6% | 37.3% | +33.7% |
| CIB Banks - RegionalGrupo Cibest S.A. | 0.40 | +398% | 1.95 | −2.0% | 38.1% | +30.2% |
Common questions
What was NU's worst drawdown?
NU's deepest decline since it began trading in 2021 was 72.1%, from December 2021 to June 2022. It took 21 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because NU launched in December 2021, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
What were NU's best and worst years?
Over four full calendar years, NU's best year was 2023, when it returned 105%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -56.6%.
Is there a better investment than NU?
Among NU's popular alternatives, BAP, ITUB and CIB earned more than NU with less volatility over the past 3 years. BAP returned 55.3% a year at 28.1% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 42.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RY (banks) and CM (banks) earned more than NU with less volatility over the past 3 years. RY returned 39.7% a year at 16.9% volatility, against 22.7% a year at 42.4%.
Is NU more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. NU's volatility over the past 3 years was 42.4%, 2.8 times the S&P 500's 15.2%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NU's return lands within 42.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is NU's Sharpe ratio?
NU's Sharpe ratio over the past 3 years was 0.70, against 1.48 for the S&P 500, so NU earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is NU with the S&P 500?
Over the past 3 years, NU's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.19 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NU instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NU holding.
What are the best alternatives to NU?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, four outperformed NU in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 1 of 1 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ITUB, BBD and CIB.
Did NU outperform the S&P 500?
NU finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of four full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +61.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did NU do in stock market crashes?
NU fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the two major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when NU fell 67.5% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies NU?
These had a low correlation with NU over the past 3 years and still earned a positive 3-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.03), CLSE (correlation 0.27) and SEIV (correlation 0.16); among large stocks, CM (correlation 0.22), BNY (correlation 0.14) and RY (correlation 0.23). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than NU's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of NU's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 1 of 1 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 3 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to NU
ITUBItaú Unibanco Holding
BBDBanco Bradesco
HOODRobinhood Markets
VVisa
MAMastercard
PYPLPayPal
MELIMercadoLibre
BSBRBanco Santander (Brasil)