Relative Intelligence · Investment Banking & Brokerage

How Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on IBKR alone. It places IBKR (Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where IBKR stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: IBKR's full trading record, from May 2007 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, IBKR fell 9.5% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?IBKR's 9.5% fall over the past 3 months is part of a broader investment banking & brokerage sell-off: the investment banking & brokerage ETF IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) fell 5.9%, with MS (Morgan Stanley, down 14.0%) and GS (Goldman Sachs Group, down 15.7%).
- Past 1 to 3 yearsIBKR has outpaced the market, rising 24.4% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (320% against 89.3%). IBKR lagged its investment banking & brokerage peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termIBKR turned $10,000 into $104,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. IBKR's 10-year return of 935% puts it ahead of 95% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, IBKR has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, IBKR has a correlation of 0.62 over 5 years, more closely than 92% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, banks) earned more than IBKR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 38.7% a year at 33.3% volatility, against 35.4% a year at 35.4%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only ten of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than IBKR with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY (Eli Lilly and Company), BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) and MPC (Marathon Petroleum).
How much would $10,000 in IBKR have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in IBKR over the past 19 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of IBKR over the same span and IBKR's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: IBKR began trading on May 4, 2007, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust. It covers the most recent 19 years of IBKR's record, starting at the end of September 2007.
- $10,000 invested in IBKR at the end of September 2007 would have grown to $182,133 by September 2026, more than the $70,725 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of IBKR, and NVDA finished highest, at $2,767,416.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2007 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 106 of the 1,798 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of IBKR; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$3M+27,574% total · +34.4% a year
- AAPL$725,525+7,155% total · +25.3% a year
- LLY$346,322+3,363% total · +20.5% a year
- GOOG$243,382+2,334% total · +18.3% a year
- MLI$187,644+1,776% total · +16.7% a year
- IBKR$182,133+1,721% total · +16.5% a year
- AMP$115,384+1,054% total · +13.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$70,725+607% total · +10.8% a year
- BGC$57,937+479% total · +9.7% a year
- OPY$43,143+331% total · +8.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 92 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of IBKR; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- HWM$73,554+636% total · +49.0% a year
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- VLO$64,131+541% total · +45.0% a year
- TRGP$61,030+510% total · +43.6% a year
- BBVA$57,750+478% total · +42.0% a year
- IBKR$56,308+463% total · +41.3% a year
- VIRT$26,921+169% total · +21.9% a year
- HOOD$26,734+167% total · +21.7% a year
- LPLA$19,958+99.6% total · +14.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
IBKR at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: IBKR began trading on May 4, 2007, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust.
- IBKR's deepest decline since it began trading in 2007 was 63.7%, from February 2008 to March 2009. It took about six years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 18 full calendar years, IBKR's best was 2024, when it returned 114%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 44.6%. It lost money in seven of those years.
- IBKR is 15.5% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $146B
- Industry
- Investment - Banking & Investment Services
- Price history from
- May 2007
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +24.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +320%+61.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +355%+35.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +935%+26.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +114%2024
- Worst calendar year
- −44.6%2008
- Losing years
- 7 of 18full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 35.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.04return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −63.7%Feb 2008 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −15.5%below the peak
IBKR against the whole market
Where IBKR ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does IBKR rank among all stocks?
This section ranks IBKR on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how IBKR stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), IBKR ranks in the top 3% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | IBKR | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +24.4% | 1,121 of 3,287 | top 34% |
| 3-year return | +320% | 198 of 3,017 | top 7% |
| 5-year return | +355% | 128 of 2,893 | top 4% |
| 10-year return | +935% | 121 of 2,202 | top 5% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 35.4% | 1,164 of 2,893 | top 40% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.04 | 80 of 2,893 | top 3% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −55.1% | 676 of 2,187 | top 31% |
What has beaten IBKR on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). IBKR sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than IBKR with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Ten stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than IBKR over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half IBKR's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 30% less than IBKR's 35.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 1.04 for IBKR. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than IBKR (33.4% against 35.4%).
- None of IBKR's popular alternatives made it, but BBVA (banks) did: 38.7% a year at 33.3% volatility, 6% less than IBKR's 35.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to IBKR; faint dots are 5 more of the 10 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than IBKR?
Investments that beat IBKR over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BBVA (banks) earned more than IBKR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 38.7% a year at 33.3% volatility, against 35.4% a year at 35.4%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only ten of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than IBKR with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, BBVA and MPC.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat IBKR over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks IBKR's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than IBKR follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than IBKR's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× IBKR's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than IBKR's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with IBKR?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.62 | 0.09% | |||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 2 shownEverything else in Investment Banking & Brokerage and Capital Markets and the categories next to it (Asset Management, Banks, Alternative Asset Management, Financial Data), plus IBKR's specific themes. 2 of 117 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.28 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.12 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 35 of 3,494 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.04 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.22 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.12 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.13 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.21 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +1,139% | 0.35 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for IBKR
- Annual return
- IBKR returned 35.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $45,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- IBKR's volatility over the past 5 years was 35.4%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, IBKR's return lands within 35.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- IBKR's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.04, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so IBKR earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- IBKR's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 55.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 55.1% fall takes a 123% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, IBKR's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.62 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against IBKR instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a IBKR holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 10 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than IBKR with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with IBKR | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.04 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.22 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.12 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.13 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.41 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.27 | — | |
| 7 | MLIMueller Industries, Inc. · Metal Fabrication | Whole market | +38.9% | 33.4% | 1.16 | −53.0% | +800% | 0.38 | — |
| 8 | Same or nearby category | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.28 | — | |
| 9 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.32 | — |
| 10 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | — | 0.24 | — |
IBKR against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against IBKR, compared period by period and year by year.
How do IBKR's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at IBKR, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 22 popular alternatives earned more than IBKR over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, IBKR returned 35.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (35.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than IBKR with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| IBKR This pageInteractive Brokers Group, Inc. | +35.4% | 35.4% |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | +21.5% | 25.1% |
| VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | +20.8% | 33.8% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | +19.6% | 28.6% |
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | +18.6% | 68.6% |
| BGC BGC Group, Inc | +17.3% | 38.2% |
| OPY Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. | +17.2% | 33.4% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | +16.0% | 28.8% |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | +13.6% | 36.2% |
| PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | +13.5% | 35.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | +12.1% | 27.8% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | +11.2% | 20.8% |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | +10.4% | 27.9% |
| FUTU Futu Holdings Limited | +10.4% | 70.2% |
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | +8.9% | 24.7% |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | +8.4% | 31.0% |
| TW Tradeweb Markets Inc. | +7.8% | 27.8% |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | +5.4% | 36.5% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | +5.4% | 21.8% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | +3.6% | 31.9% |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | −11.5% | 86.9% |
| TIGR UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A | −13.1% | 79.4% |
| MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | −15.4% | 35.3% |
Has IBKR consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares IBKR with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than IBKR helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 22 popular alternatives outperformed IBKR in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was LPLA.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than IBKR over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (this page) | — | −11.1% | −9.5% | +2.2% | +23.7% | +24.4% | +320% | +355% | +935% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | — | $146B | — |
| LPLA Financial - Capital MarketsLPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −3.1% | −1.8% | −0.3% | −10.7% | −4.9% | +47.1% | +88.9% | +1,057% | 36.2% | 0.54 | −60.3% | — | $25B | — |
| HOOD Financial - Capital MarketsRobinhood Markets, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −20.3% | −1.1% | +7.6% | −14.8% | −27.7% | +976% | +135% | — | 68.6% | 0.59 | −90.2% | — | $78B | — |
| VIRT Financial - Capital MarketsVirtu Financial, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | −1.5% | +1.1% | +13.8% | +77.5% | +76.5% | +243% | +158% | +545% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | — | $5.0B | — |
| CBOE Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCboe Global Markets, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +16.1% | +13.5% | +4.0% | +27.9% | +34.2% | +101% | +165% | +463% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | — | $33B | — |
| BGC Financial - Capital MarketsBGC Group, Inc | 4/5 short0/3 long | −6.6% | +4.1% | +0.6% | +31.0% | +27.4% | +105% | +122% | +182% | 38.2% | 0.61 | −75.3% | — | $5.4B | — |
| OPY Financial - Capital MarketsOppenheimer Holdings Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −15.5% | −6.8% | −11.0% | +39.4% | +50.8% | +201% | +121% | +743% | 33.4% | 0.64 | −54.9% | — | $1.1B | — |
| AMP Asset ManagementAmeriprise Financial, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −9.0% | −7.0% | +7.5% | −0.3% | +4.5% | +62.6% | +76.8% | +507% | 27.8% | 0.55 | −53.9% | — | $43B | — |
| NDAQ Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesNasdaq, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +0.1% | +3.5% | +8.8% | −0.9% | +8.1% | +95.1% | +52.9% | +407% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | — | $53B | — |
| CME Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCME Group Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +7.2% | +21.0% | +3.8% | +13.2% | +14.6% | +57.7% | +70.1% | +319% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | — | $106B | — |
| TW Financial - Capital MarketsTradeweb Markets Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +14.3% | +18.9% | +4.0% | +12.8% | +10.2% | +48.4% | +45.3% | — | 27.8% | 0.41 | −48.6% | — | $26B | — |
| RJF Asset ManagementRaymond James Financial, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.7% | −7.4% | +2.7% | −4.1% | −4.5% | +69.5% | +64.2% | +358% | 27.9% | 0.50 | −45.6% | — | $30B | — |
| ICE Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesIntercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +2.1% | +12.4% | −0.6% | +0.1% | +3.5% | +52.4% | +30.0% | +240% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | — | $89B | — |
| MKTX Financial - Capital MarketsMarketAxess Holdings Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +0.6% | +43.8% | +0.8% | −6.5% | −1.9% | −26.8% | −56.7% | +19.9% | 35.3% | -0.30 | −80.3% | — | $5.8B | — |
| FUTU Financial - Capital MarketsFutu Holdings Limited | 2/5 short0/3 long | −7.5% | +7.4% | −36.0% | −39.9% | −36.1% | +89.7% | +63.7% | — | 70.2% | 0.49 | −87.2% | — | $15B | — |
| GS Financial - Capital MarketsThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −7.8% | −15.7% | −5.2% | −1.8% | +18.2% | +215% | +145% | +521% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | — | $258B | — |
| JEF Financial - Capital MarketsJefferies Financial Group Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.9% | −17.8% | −3.9% | −27.5% | −14.2% | +51.7% | +30.3% | +249% | 36.5% | 0.33 | −54.4% | — | $8.5B | — |
| COIN Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCoinbase Global, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −15.0% | +6.5% | −19.3% | −27.8% | −50.3% | +129% | −45.7% | — | 86.9% | 0.29 | −90.9% | — | $45B | — |
| PIPR Investment - Banking & Investment ServicesPiper Sandler Companies | 0/5 short0/3 long | −13.2% | −15.5% | −29.3% | −24.9% | −20.5% | +103% | +88.4% | +762% | 35.5% | 0.54 | −60.0% | — | $4.5B | — |
| MS Financial - Capital MarketsMorgan Stanley | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.5% | −14.0% | −4.4% | +0.8% | +13.9% | +170% | +110% | +627% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | — | $285B | — |
| SF Financial - Capital MarketsStifel Financial Corp | 0/5 short0/3 long | −11.7% | −13.4% | −17.4% | −20.8% | −9.0% | +86.5% | +49.5% | +374% | 31.0% | 0.41 | −51.8% | — | $10B | — |
| SCHW Financial - Capital MarketsThe Charles Schwab Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −15.0% | −11.1% | −1.8% | −9.6% | −3.1% | +86.2% | +19.1% | +221% | 31.9% | 0.27 | −51.1% | — | $157B | — |
| TIGR Financial - Capital MarketsUP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A | 0/5 short0/3 long | −16.2% | −12.4% | −42.3% | −60.7% | −58.6% | −9.7% | −50.5% | — | 79.4% | 0.21 | −93.7% | — | $737M | — |
How did IBKR do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2008, along with where IBKR ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with IBKR and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: IBKR began trading on May 4, 2007, so the table starts with 2008, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust.
- IBKR finished ahead of the S&P 500 in nine of its 18 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, FUTU came out ahead of IBKR most often, in four of the six years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, IBKR finished in the top quarter in five of 18 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 5 of 23.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of IBKR; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places IBKR among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of IBKR | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR This pageInteractive Brokers Group, Inc. | — | +46.3% | +114% | +15.2% | −8.3% | +31.2% | +31.7% | −14.0% | −7.1% | +62.8% | −15.4% | +51.0% | +21.7% | +82.8% | +1.0% | −14.5% | +11.1% | −0.9% | −44.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 18 | 5 of 23 | 2 of 23 | 15 of 23 | 9 of 23 | 14 of 21 | 7 of 21 | 17 of 18 | 8 of 18 | 3 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 2 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 7 of 17 | 7 of 15 | 14 of 15 | 5 of 15 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 18 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 6 of 15 | +9.8% | +44.1% | +5.9% | +35.7% | +54.6% | +14.6% | +52.9% | +8.5% | +66.0% | −14.1% | −2.0% | −3.4% | +70.1% | −1.3% | −16.0% | — | — | — |
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 3 of 4 | +204% | +192% | +56.5% | −54.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −4.2% | +83.0% | +4.6% | −26.5% | +18.6% | +64.3% | −34.8% | +46.0% | +21.4% | −25.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 9 of 15 | +30.0% | +10.7% | +44.4% | −2.1% | +42.2% | −21.2% | +24.1% | −20.6% | +70.5% | +15.5% | +3.8% | +23.8% | +80.7% | +19.1% | +15.0% | — | — | — |
| BGC BGC Group, Inc | 7 of 18 | −0.6% | +26.5% | +92.6% | −17.8% | +17.1% | −30.0% | +27.8% | −43.6% | +56.1% | +11.6% | +14.0% | +60.3% | +91.1% | −34.7% | −22.4% | +94.4% | +85.6% | −74.2% |
| OPY Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. | 7 of 18 | +15.5% | +57.3% | −0.9% | −7.2% | +52.7% | +20.4% | +9.4% | −3.3% | +47.6% | +10.2% | −23.7% | −4.5% | +47.0% | +10.3% | −37.3% | −19.8% | +164% | −69.0% |
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 10 of 18 | −6.7% | +42.1% | +24.0% | +5.0% | +57.9% | +19.8% | +64.0% | −36.8% | +56.4% | +7.7% | −17.8% | +17.2% | +88.4% | +29.5% | −12.3% | +50.7% | +70.6% | −56.9% |
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 8 of 18 | +27.2% | +34.9% | −3.7% | −11.2% | +60.1% | +26.0% | +33.9% | +8.2% | +16.8% | +17.4% | +23.3% | +22.4% | +61.9% | +3.7% | +3.2% | +19.7% | −19.8% | −50.1% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 6 of 18 | +19.8% | +15.4% | +31.3% | −22.9% | +29.5% | −6.3% | +9.7% | +32.1% | +32.4% | +33.9% | +4.4% | +18.3% | +64.0% | +11.4% | −22.7% | −2.7% | +64.3% | −68.8% |
| TW Tradeweb Markets Inc. | 3 of 6 | −17.5% | +44.6% | +40.6% | −34.9% | +61.0% | +35.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 8 of 18 | +4.7% | +40.8% | +6.1% | +8.3% | +59.5% | +8.7% | +22.8% | −15.7% | +30.0% | +21.3% | +2.5% | +11.1% | +37.2% | +26.3% | −3.7% | +39.8% | +41.8% | −46.4% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 7 of 18 | +9.9% | +17.5% | +27.1% | −23.9% | +19.9% | +26.2% | +24.5% | +8.1% | +26.6% | +11.5% | +18.3% | −1.3% | +82.2% | +2.7% | +1.2% | +6.1% | +36.2% | −57.2% |
| MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | 11 of 18 | −18.5% | −21.8% | +6.1% | −31.5% | −27.5% | +51.3% | +80.7% | +5.6% | +38.3% | +32.7% | +57.0% | +8.3% | +91.7% | +23.8% | +46.8% | +52.4% | +71.1% | −36.3% |
| FUTU Futu Holdings Limited | 4 of 6 | +105% | +49.8% | +34.4% | −6.1% | −5.4% | +343% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 7 of 18 | +56.6% | +52.0% | +15.9% | −7.9% | +47.6% | +17.4% | +40.5% | −33.5% | +7.4% | +34.9% | −5.8% | +10.8% | +40.8% | +43.4% | −45.6% | +0.5% | +103% | −60.4% |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | 7 of 18 | −18.8% | +98.9% | +27.8% | −8.5% | +61.9% | +18.9% | +35.1% | −33.2% | +15.5% | +35.5% | −21.5% | −20.1% | +23.5% | +5.8% | −21.2% | +23.8% | +20.1% | −58.0% |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −8.9% | +42.8% | +391% | −86.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 8 of 18 | +15.5% | +74.3% | +37.8% | −23.4% | +85.3% | +29.7% | +33.6% | −10.7% | +28.2% | +79.7% | −30.5% | +46.8% | +23.2% | +58.8% | −42.2% | −30.9% | +27.3% | −14.2% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 7 of 18 | +45.2% | +39.7% | +13.9% | −10.3% | +46.6% | +38.1% | +32.7% | −22.8% | +26.6% | +36.1% | −16.7% | +25.0% | +65.4% | +27.6% | −43.9% | −7.5% | +88.3% | −68.8% |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | 6 of 18 | +20.9% | +57.2% | +22.7% | −14.8% | +41.4% | +27.1% | +48.8% | −29.5% | +20.0% | +17.9% | −16.9% | +6.4% | +49.9% | −0.3% | −22.5% | +4.8% | +29.1% | +30.7% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 7 of 18 | +36.6% | +9.2% | −16.0% | +0.1% | +60.2% | +13.6% | +16.4% | −18.4% | +31.1% | +21.0% | +9.9% | +17.2% | +83.3% | +29.8% | −33.1% | −7.8% | +18.1% | −36.1% |
| TIGR UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A | 3 of 6 | +48.0% | +46.2% | +29.6% | −30.6% | −38.2% | +124% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How IBKR has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were IBKR's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents IBKR's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2007, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: IBKR began trading on May 4, 2007, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of IBKR's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after IBKR fell 63.7% from February 2008 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until November 2014, six years later.
Green means IBKR fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | IBKR fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −63.7% | −50.0% | Feb 2008 | Mar 2009 | 13 months | Nov 2014 | 5.7 years |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −55.1% | −15.0% | May 2018 | Mar 2020 | 22 months | Mar 2021 | 12 months |
| No named crash | −38.7% | −17.3% | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 | 2 months | Jul 2025 | 3 months |
| 2022 bear market | −35.3% | −16.2% | Dec 2021 | May 2022 | 5 months | Jan 2023 | 8 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −33.3% | −9.3% | Jul 2015 | Feb 2016 | 7 months | Sep 2017 | 19 months |
How did IBKR do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far IBKR, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: IBKR began trading on May 4, 2007, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- IBKR fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when IBKR fell 32.6% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, VIRT held up best, falling less than IBKR in five of the six crashes they both traded through.
- IBKR began trading after the dot-com bust, but eight of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was JEF's 28.6%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than IBKR.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR This pageInteractive Brokers Group, Inc. | — | −14.3% | −33.3% | −38.0% | −18.2% | −5.6% | −32.6% | −14.2% | −2.6% | −63.7% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 2 of 7 | −19.8% | −24.7% | −60.3% | −19.8% | −4.5% | −46.0% | −28.1% | — | — | — |
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −6.8% | −60.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | 5 of 6 | −8.7% | −44.4% | −21.7% | −9.6% | −3.4% | −20.9% | — | — | — | — |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 4 of 7 | −3.7% | −16.4% | −38.6% | −18.9% | −20.4% | −17.0% | −11.8% | — | — | — |
| BGC BGC Group, Inc | 2 of 9 | −4.0% | −34.0% | −54.4% | −31.3% | −7.3% | −16.7% | −30.0% | −9.1% | −88.1% | −93.8% |
| OPY Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. | 1 of 9 | −9.9% | −41.4% | −46.3% | −28.1% | −7.4% | −35.6% | −47.9% | −5.4% | −85.3% | −30.3% |
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −14.9% | −31.5% | −53.9% | −35.3% | −8.9% | −38.2% | −32.3% | −2.6% | −81.1% | — |
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −5.7% | −27.8% | −37.1% | −16.7% | −6.4% | −10.1% | −16.1% | −5.3% | −68.5% | — |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 7 of 9 | −3.4% | −31.7% | −37.4% | −9.4% | −4.3% | −17.3% | −18.0% | −1.9% | −77.5% | — |
| TW Tradeweb Markets Inc. | 2 of 3 | −5.9% | −44.3% | −30.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −16.2% | −25.8% | −45.6% | −26.5% | −8.8% | −31.6% | −29.3% | −0.3% | −69.7% | −40.7% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −7.0% | −33.8% | −33.0% | −13.3% | −9.4% | −12.7% | −19.3% | −2.0% | −73.9% | — |
| MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −44.0% | −25.5% | −13.1% | −4.1% | −12.7% | −20.1% | −3.8% | −72.8% | — |
| FUTU Futu Holdings Limited | 1 of 3 | −6.9% | −50.2% | −37.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −9.7% | −30.5% | −42.8% | −33.3% | −5.3% | −31.2% | −34.3% | 0.0% | −78.8% | −54.7% |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | 0 of 9 | −15.2% | −35.3% | −48.3% | −29.9% | −9.3% | −37.0% | −39.3% | −3.3% | −80.7% | −28.6% |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −15.2% | −81.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 2 of 9 | −12.4% | −41.5% | −59.6% | −20.0% | −5.6% | −27.8% | −46.7% | −2.8% | −67.7% | — |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 3 of 9 | −8.2% | −32.4% | −50.6% | −24.6% | −6.7% | −43.9% | −47.7% | 0.0% | −86.2% | −72.0% |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | 1 of 9 | −17.1% | −34.9% | −51.8% | −28.7% | −8.3% | −47.4% | −39.6% | −4.2% | −41.5% | −31.3% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 1 of 9 | −31.9% | −36.9% | −41.5% | −26.5% | −8.2% | −37.0% | −28.9% | −5.5% | −56.0% | −83.1% |
| TIGR UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A | 1 of 3 | −13.1% | −50.8% | −44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does IBKR move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares IBKR with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, IBKR captured 128% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 92% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.03. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- LPLA took just 52% of the S&P 500's losses, against 92% for IBKR, while still keeping 110% of its gains.
- Four of the 16 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than IBKR's 1.40, led by CME, LPLA and OPY.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than IBKR's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR This pageInteractive Brokers Group, Inc. | 128% | 92% | 1.40 | 1.03 |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 50% | 11% | 4.48 | 0.33 |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 110% | 52% | 2.13 | 0.85 |
| OPY Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. | 119% | 74% | 1.60 | 1.12 |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 79% | 50% | 1.59 | 0.53 |
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 104% | 97% | 1.07 | 0.91 |
| PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 152% | 142% | 1.07 | 1.39 |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 103% | 97% | 1.06 | 1.07 |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 142% | 137% | 1.04 | 1.39 |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 136% | 133% | 1.02 | 1.39 |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 89% | 90% | 0.99 | 0.91 |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | 120% | 125% | 0.96 | 1.25 |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 88% | 94% | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 141% | 152% | 0.93 | 1.41 |
| BGC BGC Group, Inc | 96% | 118% | 0.82 | 1.42 |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | 147% | 197% | 0.75 | 1.52 |
| MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | 40% | 74% | 0.54 | 0.62 |
| VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | 45% | -28% | — | 0.20 |
What diversifies IBKR?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with IBKR's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing IBKR with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in IBKR into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+41.3% for IBKR alone, +41.6% for the mix).
- GLD made money in five of the seven calendar years in which IBKR lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of IBKR over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.40 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which IBKR lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% IBKR and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2019 | 2018 | 2016 | 2011 | 2009 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +355% | 1.04 | −8.3% | −14.0% | −7.1% | −15.4% | −14.5% | −0.9% | −44.6% | 34.7% | +41.3% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.23 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | +17.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | 28.2% | +37.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.28 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +18.9% | −19.8% | +1.1% | −16.1% | +2.0% | −20.8% | 28.5% | +39.4% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.40 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | +23.4% | −8.7% | +29.8% | — | — | — | 29.0% | +36.7% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.45 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | +64.5% | −9.1% | +35.6% | +6.8% | +60.5% | −44.7% | 31.5% | +41.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.02 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | +17.9% | −1.9% | +8.0% | +9.6% | +24.0% | +4.9% | 28.0% | +37.9% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.22 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | +11.7% | −18.2% | +28.0% | +2.8% | +21.8% | −39.0% | 29.3% | +39.0% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.30 | +99.4% | 0.93 | −3.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.8% | +36.9% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.33 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | +33.4% | −9.9% | +17.7% | −21.8% | +73.7% | −45.3% | 29.8% | +38.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2019 | 2018 | 2016 | 2011 | 2009 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +355% | 1.04 | −8.3% | −14.0% | −7.1% | −15.4% | −14.5% | −0.9% | −44.6% | 34.7% | +41.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.12 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | +18.0% | −24.5% | −17.5% | +8.1% | −4.4% | −39.6% | 28.9% | +42.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.13 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +26.7% | −28.4% | −28.3% | +11.8% | +62.9% | −40.4% | 28.8% | +41.6% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.22 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | +6.0% | −8.2% | +0.7% | — | — | — | 29.8% | +44.5% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.41 | +594% | 1.36 | +24.2% | +83.6% | −37.5% | −11.5% | −42.9% | +51.3% | −67.4% | 31.2% | +44.3% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.28 | +1,008% | 1.34 | +87.5% | −5.1% | −9.8% | +43.9% | −12.2% | +79.8% | −70.0% | 31.7% | +47.9% |
Common questions
What was IBKR's worst drawdown?
IBKR's deepest decline since it began trading in 2007 was 63.7%, from February 2008 to March 2009. It took about six years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because IBKR launched in May 2007, that record does not include the dot-com bust.
What were IBKR's best and worst years?
Over 18 full calendar years, IBKR's best year was 2024, when it returned 114%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -44.6%.
Is there a better investment than IBKR?
Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BBVA (banks) earned more than IBKR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 38.7% a year at 33.3% volatility, against 35.4% a year at 35.4%. Few investments have done better on both counts: only ten of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than IBKR with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, BBVA and MPC.
Is IBKR more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. IBKR's volatility over the past 5 years was 35.4%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, IBKR's return lands within 35.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is IBKR's Sharpe ratio?
IBKR's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.04, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so IBKR earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is IBKR with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, IBKR's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.62 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against IBKR instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a IBKR holding.
What are the best alternatives to IBKR?
None of the 22 popular alternatives we compared outperformed IBKR in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about IBKR's strength than about its alternatives.
Did IBKR outperform the S&P 500?
IBKR finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in nine of 18 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +46.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did IBKR do in stock market crashes?
IBKR fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when IBKR fell 32.6% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies IBKR?
These had a low correlation with IBKR over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.23), DXJ (correlation 0.28) and EMLP (correlation 0.40); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.12), MCK (correlation 0.13) and MPC (correlation 0.22). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than IBKR's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of IBKR's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to IBKR
HOODRobinhood Markets
AMPAmeriprise Financial
NDAQNasdaq
CMECME Group
ICEIntercontinental Exchange
GSGoldman Sachs Group
COINCoinbase Global
MSMorgan Stanley
SCHWCharles Schwab