Relative Intelligence · Capital Markets

How Nasdaq (NDAQ) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on NDAQ alone. It places NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where NDAQ stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: NDAQ's full trading record, from July 2002 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowNot every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, CME (CME Group) rose 21.0% and SCHW (Charles Schwab) fell 11.1%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?NDAQ held up far better than its industry: it rose 3.5% over the past 3 months while the capital markets ETF IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) fell 5.9%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its capital market peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: CME (CME Group) rose 21.0%, while SCHW (Charles Schwab) fell 11.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsNDAQ has trailed the market, rising 8.1% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. On the flip side, it lagged its capital market peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termOver the past decade, NDAQ returned 17.6% a year against 15.5% a year for the S&P 500 (407% in total against 321%). Even so, the past 5 years only trailed the S&P 500 (52.9% against 81.7%), after a much stronger decade (407% against 321%). Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe Covid crash took 37.1% off NDAQ, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, 33.0%) but less than SCHW (Charles Schwab, 41.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationNDAQ is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.59 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.59 with the total US market, more closely than 89% of stocks worth at least $300 million. When the S&P 500 had a down month, NDAQ usually fell with it (17 of 22 months). By year ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- RY (Royal Bank of Canada, banks) and TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank, banks) earned more than NDAQ with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 8.9% a year at 24.7%.
- Whole market
- 377 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NDAQ with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in NDAQ have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in NDAQ over the past 24 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of NDAQ over the same span and NDAQ's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in NDAQ at the end of September 2002 would have grown to $374,031 by September 2026, more than the $144,215 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of NDAQ, and AME finished highest, at $671,367.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2002 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 193 of the 1,370 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NDAQ; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AME$671,367+6,614% total · +19.2% a year
- GILD$521,150+5,112% total · +17.9% a year
- BLK$434,103+4,241% total · +17.0% a year
- COST$422,847+4,128% total · +16.9% a year
- TJX$420,025+4,100% total · +16.9% a year
- NDAQ$374,031+3,640% total · +16.3% a year
- FICO$280,661+2,707% total · +14.9% a year
- GS$195,466+1,855% total · +13.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$144,215+1,342% total · +11.8% a year
- MS$109,924+999% total · +10.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,503 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NDAQ; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- IBKR$56,308+463% total · +41.3% a year
- GS$26,885+169% total · +21.9% a year
- CBOE$23,731+137% total · +18.9% a year
- RY$23,646+136% total · +18.8% a year
- MS$22,663+127% total · +17.8% a year
- TD$21,998+120% total · +17.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- CME$16,716+67.2% total · +10.8% a year
- XLF$15,505+55.0% total · +9.2% a year
- NDAQ$15,317+53.2% total · +8.9% a year
NDAQ at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- NDAQ's deepest decline since it began trading in 2002 was 68.5%, from December 2007 to November 2008. It took about six years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 23 full calendar years, NDAQ's best was 2005, when it returned 245%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 50.1%. It lost money in six of those years.
- NDAQ is 5.2% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $53B
- Industry
- Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
- Price history from
- July 2002
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +8.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +95.1%+24.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +52.9%+8.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- +407%+17.6% a year
- Best calendar year
- +245%2005
- Worst calendar year
- −50.1%2008
- Losing years
- 6 of 23full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 24.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.47return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −68.5%Dec 2007 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −5.2%below the peak
NDAQ against the whole market
Where NDAQ ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does NDAQ rank among all stocks?
This section ranks NDAQ on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how NDAQ stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- NDAQ's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 5% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | NDAQ | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +8.1% | 1,659 of 3,287 | top 50% |
| 3-year return | +95.1% | 960 of 3,017 | top 32% |
| 5-year return | +52.9% | 1,070 of 2,893 | top 37% |
| 10-year return | +407% | 411 of 2,202 | top 19% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 24.7% | 299 of 2,893 | top 10% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.47 | 1,010 of 2,893 | top 35% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −38.3% | 112 of 2,187 | top 5% |
What has beaten NDAQ on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). NDAQ sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than NDAQ with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 67 stocks and 310 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than NDAQ over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 10% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half NDAQ's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 23% less than NDAQ's 24.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.47 for NDAQ.
- Among NDAQ's popular alternatives, CME is in the region. CME earned 11.2% a year against 8.9% a year for NDAQ, at 20.8% volatility, 16% less than NDAQ's 24.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to NDAQ; faint dots are 88 more of the 377 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than NDAQ?
Investments that beat NDAQ over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among NDAQ's popular alternatives, CME earned more than NDAQ with less volatility over the past 5 years: 11.2% a year at 20.8% volatility, against 8.9% a year at 24.7%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RY (banks) and TD (banks) earned more than NDAQ with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 8.9% a year at 24.7%.
- Across the whole market, 377 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NDAQ with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat NDAQ over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks NDAQ's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than NDAQ follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than NDAQ's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× NDAQ's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than NDAQ's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with NDAQ?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +8.9% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | +407% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.59 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against NDAQ. 3 of 23 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.51 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.33 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | +8.6% | 18.3% | 0.54 | −42.9% | +241% | 0.62 | 0.08% | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Capital Markets and the categories next to it (Investment Banking & Brokerage, Financial Data, Banks, Asset Management), plus NDAQ's specific themes. 28 of 121 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.41 | — | ||
SEICSEI Investments Company · Asset Management | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 22.3% | 0.65 | −51.8% | +168% | 0.63 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatility | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.14 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 692 of 3,489 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.1% | 21.5% | 0.68 | −32.7% | +413% | 0.55 | 0.18% | ||
SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.37 | 0.13% | |
OEFiShares S&P 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.3% | 17.8% | 0.84 | −31.4% | +367% | 0.58 | 0.20% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.28 | — | ||
IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.57 | 0.40% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.29 | — | ||
DOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October · Multi-Asset | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +8.3% | 7.4% | 1.11 | −9.9% | — | 0.52 | 0.85% | |
What these numbers mean for NDAQ
- Annual return
- NDAQ returned 8.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $15,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- NDAQ's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.7%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NDAQ's return lands within 24.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- NDAQ's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.47, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NDAQ earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- NDAQ's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 38.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 38.3% fall takes a 62.1% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, NDAQ's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.59 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NDAQ instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NDAQ holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 377 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than NDAQ with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with NDAQ | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.32 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +13.1% | 21.5% | 0.68 | −32.7% | +413% | 0.55 | 0.18% | |
| 3 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.37 | 0.13% |
| 4 | OEFiShares S&P 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.8% | 0.84 | −31.4% | +367% | 0.58 | 0.20% |
| 5 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.28 | — | |
| 6 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.57 | 0.40% |
| 7 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.44 | 0.50% |
| 8 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.37 | — | |
| 9 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.48 | 0.15% |
| 10 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.51 | 0.45% |
| 11 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.03 | — | |
| 12 | Same or nearby category | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.30 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.41 | — | |
| 14 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.05 | 0.48% |
| 15 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.15 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.31 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.11 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.24 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.05 | — | |
| 20 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.32 | 0.40% |
| 21 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.40 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.70 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.11 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.18 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.38 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.17 | 0.40% | |
| 27 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.28 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.60 | 0.04% | |
| 29 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.59 | 0.56% |
| 30 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.42 | 0.36% |
| 31 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | 0.34 | — |
| 32 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.25 | — | |
| 33 | Same or nearby category | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.26 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.59 | 0.21% | |
| 35 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.53 | 0.79% |
| 36 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.50 | 0.85% |
| 37 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.12 | — | |
| 38 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.41 | 0.15% |
| 39 | Same or nearby category | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.31 | — | |
| 40 | Same or nearby category | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.41 | — | |
| 41 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.18 | — |
| 42 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +114% | 0.21 | — | |
| 43 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.37 | — |
| 44 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.39 | 0.27% |
| 45 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.54 | 0.15% |
| 46 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.27 | — |
| 47 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.41 | 0.20% |
| 48 | SEICSEI Investments Company · Asset Management | Same or nearby category | +12.7% | 22.3% | 0.65 | −51.8% | +168% | 0.63 | — |
| 49 | BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · Buffered Equity | Whole market | +9.9% | 10.5% | 0.96 | −13.7% | — | 0.57 | 0.10% |
| 50 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.63 | 0.05% |
| 51 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.39 | 0.35% |
| 52 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.58 | 0.12% |
| 53 | DIVOAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +11.1% | 11.9% | 0.95 | −30.0% | — | 0.60 | 0.56% |
| 54 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.35 | 0.61% |
| 55 | TSPAT. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.1% | 17.1% | 0.81 | −24.7% | — | 0.57 | 0.34% |
| 56 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.51 | 0.25% |
| 57 | FTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.4% | 0.99 | −20.6% | +158% | 0.54 | 0.95% |
| 58 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.33 | 0.70% |
| 59 | GVALCambria Global Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.4% | 18.7% | 0.82 | −46.8% | +173% | 0.29 | 0.68% |
| 60 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.40 | 0.09% |
| 61 | BCIabrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +10.1% | 16.7% | 0.66 | −32.7% | — | 0.13 | 0.26% |
| 62 | FTHIFirst Trust BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +10.3% | 13.3% | 0.81 | −32.7% | +126% | 0.51 | 0.75% |
| 63 | PWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.8% | 22.2% | 0.74 | −32.4% | +409% | 0.43 | 0.55% |
| 64 | HFXINYLI FTSE International Equity Currency Neutral ETF · International | Whole market | +11.4% | 15.3% | 0.79 | −32.4% | +180% | 0.37 | 0.19% |
| 65 | FBTFirst Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund · Healthcare | Whole market | +10.8% | 22.2% | 0.58 | −33.3% | +203% | 0.37 | 0.55% |
| 66 | DSTLDistillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 16.1% | 0.75 | −33.1% | — | 0.62 | 0.39% |
| 67 | QDPLPacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.8% | 15.0% | 0.82 | −22.6% | — | 0.60 | 0.60% |
| 68 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 22.8% | 0.77 | −32.3% | +286% | 0.49 | — |
| 69 | INFLHorizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.8% | 17.8% | 0.72 | −21.3% | — | 0.50 | 0.85% |
| 70 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.11 | 0.45% |
| 71 | PPHVanEck Pharmaceutical ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.8% | 0.78 | −29.7% | +153% | 0.23 | 0.36% |
| 72 | CRBNiShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF · International | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.3% | 0.69 | −33.1% | +223% | 0.55 | 0.20% |
| 73 | SIXHETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity Index Option ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.2% | 1.00 | −11.7% | — | 0.38 | 0.31% |
| 74 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.23 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.52 | 0.03% | |
| 76 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.28 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.18 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.13 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.31 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.27 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | 0.15 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +12.9% | 20.8% | 0.69 | −51.6% | +184% | 0.25 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.34 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.36 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +11.8% | 22.6% | 0.61 | −39.2% | +118% | 0.30 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.20 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +11.9% | 19.4% | 0.68 | −54.4% | +30.4% | -0.01 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +10.8% | 21.9% | 0.58 | −41.6% | +160% | 0.27 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.3% | 0.71 | −34.1% | +293% | 0.55 | 0.15% | |
| 90 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.12 | 0.80% |
| 91 | Whole market | +11.7% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | +255% | 0.36 | — | |
| 92 | HIGThe Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +15.6% | 22.0% | 0.77 | −57.6% | +294% | 0.36 | — |
| 93 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.08 | — |
| 94 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.37 | 0.25% |
| 95 | XLIState Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF · US Industrials | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.6% | 0.71 | −42.3% | +246% | 0.45 | 0.08% |
| 96 | PBAPembina Pipeline Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +13.8% | 21.5% | 0.71 | −70.9% | +172% | 0.30 | — |
| 97 | LLoews Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.3% | 19.2% | 0.80 | −48.5% | +180% | 0.20 | — |
| 98 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.44 | 0.08% |
| 99 | AVUVAvantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF · US Small-Cap Equity | Whole market | +10.5% | 22.1% | 0.56 | −49.4% | — | 0.47 | 0.25% |
| 100 | CNPCenterPoint Energy, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +11.4% | 19.6% | 0.65 | −59.8% | +142% | 0.13 | — |
NDAQ against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against NDAQ, compared period by period and year by year.
How do NDAQ's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at NDAQ, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only CME was both more rewarding and calmer than NDAQ over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- 13 of the 23 popular alternatives earned less than NDAQ over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, NDAQ returned 8.9% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (24.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than NDAQ with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | +35.4% | 35.4% |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | +21.5% | 25.1% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | +19.6% | 28.6% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | +16.0% | 28.8% |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | +14.3% | 45.5% |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | +13.6% | 36.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | +11.2% | 20.8% |
| NDAQ This pageNasdaq, Inc. | +8.9% | 24.7% |
| XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | +8.6% | 18.3% |
| TW Tradeweb Markets Inc. | +7.8% | 27.8% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | +7.1% | 27.1% |
| MCO Moody's Corporation | +5.9% | 26.9% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | +5.4% | 21.8% |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | +4.7% | 25.2% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | +3.6% | 31.9% |
| BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | +1.7% | 24.6% |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | +0.7% | 25.6% |
| MSCI MSCI Inc. | +0.1% | 31.3% |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | −1.4% | 25.9% |
| FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | −4.8% | 30.4% |
| MORN Morningstar, Inc. | −5.1% | 32.4% |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | −11.5% | 86.9% |
| MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | −15.4% | 35.3% |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | −19.7% | 33.9% |
Has NDAQ consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares NDAQ with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than NDAQ helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- CBOE outperformed NDAQ in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Only one of the 23 popular alternatives, CBOE, outperformed NDAQ in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- CME earned more for the risk it took than NDAQ (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than NDAQ over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. (this page) | — | +0.1% | +3.5% | +8.8% | −0.9% | +8.1% | +95.1% | +52.9% | +407% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | — | $53B | — |
| CBOE QualifiedCboe Global Markets, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +16.1% | +13.5% | +4.0% | +27.9% | +34.2% | +101% | +165% | +463% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | — | $33B | — |
| IBKR Investment - Banking & Investment ServicesInteractive Brokers Group, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −11.1% | −9.5% | +2.2% | +23.7% | +24.4% | +320% | +355% | +935% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | — | $146B | — |
| MS Financial - Capital MarketsMorgan Stanley | 2/5 short3/3 long | −12.5% | −14.0% | −4.4% | +0.8% | +13.9% | +170% | +110% | +627% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | — | $285B | — |
| GS Financial - Capital MarketsThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −7.8% | −15.7% | −5.2% | −1.8% | +18.2% | +215% | +145% | +521% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | — | $258B | — |
| LPLA Financial - Capital MarketsLPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −3.1% | −1.8% | −0.3% | −10.7% | −4.9% | +47.1% | +88.9% | +1,057% | 36.2% | 0.54 | −60.3% | — | $25B | — |
| FICO Software - ApplicationFair Isaac Corporation | 0/5 short2/3 long | −13.5% | −36.7% | −24.8% | −51.3% | −50.6% | −12.3% | +94.8% | +549% | 45.5% | 0.52 | −75.1% | — | $17B | — |
| CME Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCME Group Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +7.2% | +21.0% | +3.8% | +13.2% | +14.6% | +57.7% | +70.1% | +319% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | — | $106B | — |
| MSCI Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesMSCI Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +5.9% | −5.0% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +11.8% | +25.5% | +0.5% | +702% | 31.3% | 0.16 | −43.7% | — | $43B | — |
| COIN Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCoinbase Global, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −15.0% | +6.5% | −19.3% | −27.8% | −50.3% | +129% | −45.7% | — | 86.9% | 0.29 | −90.9% | — | $45B | — |
| FDS Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesFactSet Research Systems Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +9.9% | +22.5% | +33.5% | +11.1% | +9.5% | −24.7% | −21.8% | +127% | 30.4% | -0.01 | −61.1% | — | $11B | — |
| MORN Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesMorningstar, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +5.4% | +23.6% | +14.2% | +1.5% | −1.9% | −3.7% | −22.9% | +203% | 32.4% | 0.00 | −60.0% | — | $7.9B | — |
| SSNC Software - ApplicationSS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +8.1% | +25.5% | +22.8% | +2.5% | +8.3% | +81.0% | +26.0% | +200% | 25.2% | 0.31 | −48.9% | — | $20B | — |
| TW Financial - Capital MarketsTradeweb Markets Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +14.3% | +18.9% | +4.0% | +12.8% | +10.2% | +48.4% | +45.3% | — | 27.8% | 0.41 | −48.6% | — | $26B | — |
| BLK Asset ManagementBlackRock, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +3.5% | +7.6% | +8.8% | +5.7% | −0.6% | +96.3% | +41.1% | +313% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | — | $175B | — |
| ICE Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesIntercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +2.1% | +12.4% | −0.6% | +0.1% | +3.5% | +52.4% | +30.0% | +240% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | — | $89B | — |
| BR Information Technology ServicesBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +9.3% | +20.7% | +13.1% | −16.8% | −20.2% | +9.7% | +8.7% | +234% | 24.6% | 0.19 | −48.2% | — | $20B | — |
| MKTX Financial - Capital MarketsMarketAxess Holdings Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +0.6% | +43.8% | +0.8% | −6.5% | −1.9% | −26.8% | −56.7% | +19.9% | 35.3% | -0.30 | −80.3% | — | $5.8B | — |
| MCO Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesMoody's Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +1.7% | −5.7% | +3.8% | −4.1% | +1.1% | +57.3% | +33.4% | +383% | 26.9% | 0.35 | −42.0% | — | $82B | — |
| SPGI Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesS&P Global Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +8.3% | −2.1% | −0.6% | −13.9% | −7.4% | +28.2% | +3.7% | +293% | 25.6% | 0.16 | −39.8% | — | $129B | — |
| XLF FinancialsState Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1/5 short0/3 long | −0.3% | −0.2% | +6.6% | +2.7% | +7.2% | +81.3% | +50.9% | +241% | 18.3% | 0.54 | −42.9% | 0.08% | $51B | — |
| VRSK Software - ServicesVerisk Analytics, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +11.0% | −5.2% | +6.8% | −13.0% | −18.1% | −16.8% | −6.7% | +151% | 25.9% | 0.08 | −50.8% | — | $25B | — |
| FIS Information Technology ServicesFidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +3.5% | −12.8% | −22.9% | −42.7% | −44.3% | −21.6% | −66.6% | −41.3% | 33.9% | -0.47 | −76.0% | — | $19B | — |
| SCHW Financial - Capital MarketsThe Charles Schwab Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −15.0% | −11.1% | −1.8% | −9.6% | −3.1% | +86.2% | +19.1% | +221% | 31.9% | 0.27 | −51.1% | — | $157B | — |
How did NDAQ do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2003, along with where NDAQ ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with NDAQ and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- NDAQ finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 15 of its 23 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, FICO came out ahead of NDAQ most often, in 16 of the 23 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, NDAQ finished in the top quarter in seven of 23 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 6 of 24.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of NDAQ; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places NDAQ among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of NDAQ | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ This pageNasdaq, Inc. | — | +27.2% | +34.9% | −3.7% | −11.2% | +60.1% | +26.0% | +33.9% | +8.2% | +16.8% | +17.4% | +23.3% | +22.4% | +61.9% | +3.7% | +3.2% | +19.7% | −19.8% | −50.1% | +60.8% | −12.5% | +245% | +8.0% | −5.3% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 23 | 6 of 24 | 9 of 24 | 22 of 24 | 9 of 24 | 3 of 23 | 12 of 23 | 13 of 22 | 9 of 22 | 21 of 22 | 10 of 22 | 6 of 22 | 6 of 22 | 11 of 22 | 17 of 22 | 9 of 22 | 4 of 19 | 18 of 18 | 11 of 18 | 3 of 15 | 15 of 15 | 1 of 13 | 9 of 12 | 12 of 12 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 23 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 8 of 15 | +30.0% | +10.7% | +44.4% | −2.1% | +42.2% | −21.2% | +24.1% | −20.6% | +70.5% | +15.5% | +3.8% | +23.8% | +80.7% | +19.1% | +15.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 10 of 18 | +46.3% | +114% | +15.2% | −8.3% | +31.2% | +31.7% | −14.0% | −7.1% | +62.8% | −15.4% | +51.0% | +21.7% | +82.8% | +1.0% | −14.5% | +11.1% | −0.9% | −44.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 13 of 23 | +45.2% | +39.7% | +13.9% | −10.3% | +46.6% | +38.1% | +32.7% | −22.8% | +26.6% | +36.1% | −16.7% | +25.0% | +65.4% | +27.6% | −43.9% | −7.5% | +88.3% | −68.8% | −22.1% | +46.3% | +4.6% | −2.0% | +48.4% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 10 of 23 | +56.6% | +52.0% | +15.9% | −7.9% | +47.6% | +17.4% | +40.5% | −33.5% | +7.4% | +34.9% | −5.8% | +10.8% | +40.8% | +43.4% | −45.6% | +0.5% | +103% | −60.4% | +8.6% | +57.4% | +23.9% | +6.5% | +46.3% |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 6 of 15 | +9.8% | +44.1% | +5.9% | +35.7% | +54.6% | +14.6% | +52.9% | +8.5% | +66.0% | −14.1% | −2.0% | −3.4% | +70.1% | −1.3% | −16.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 16 of 23 | −15.1% | +71.0% | +94.5% | +38.0% | −15.1% | +36.4% | +100% | +22.1% | +28.5% | +26.7% | +30.4% | +15.2% | +49.8% | +17.5% | +53.8% | +10.1% | +27.0% | −47.4% | −20.7% | −7.8% | +20.7% | +12.2% | +15.3% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 10 of 23 | +19.8% | +15.4% | +31.3% | −22.9% | +29.5% | −6.3% | +9.7% | +32.1% | +32.4% | +33.9% | +4.4% | +18.3% | +64.0% | +11.4% | −22.7% | −2.7% | +64.3% | −68.8% | +35.3% | +39.5% | +61.8% | +219% | +67.5% |
| MSCI MSCI Inc. | 8 of 18 | −3.2% | +7.3% | +22.9% | −23.3% | +38.1% | +74.4% | +77.2% | +18.0% | +62.6% | +10.6% | +54.0% | +9.0% | +41.0% | −5.9% | −15.5% | +22.5% | +79.1% | −53.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | 2 of 4 | −8.9% | +42.8% | +391% | −86.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | 10 of 23 | −38.9% | +1.6% | +20.0% | −16.8% | +47.5% | +25.1% | +35.5% | +5.0% | +19.4% | +1.8% | +16.7% | +31.3% | +24.9% | +2.2% | −5.9% | +44.1% | +51.1% | −19.5% | −0.7% | +37.9% | +6.3% | +54.2% | +36.0% |
| MORN Morningstar, Inc. | 11 of 20 | −35.0% | +18.3% | +33.1% | −36.3% | +48.2% | +54.5% | +38.9% | +14.3% | +33.4% | −7.5% | +25.6% | −16.4% | +24.9% | +6.6% | +12.3% | +9.9% | +36.2% | −54.4% | +72.6% | +30.0% | — | — | — |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 7 of 15 | +16.8% | +25.8% | +19.2% | −35.7% | +13.7% | +19.5% | +37.2% | +12.1% | +42.5% | −15.6% | +17.7% | +32.5% | +91.6% | +27.9% | −11.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TW Tradeweb Markets Inc. | 3 of 6 | −17.5% | +44.6% | +40.6% | −34.9% | +61.0% | +35.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 9 of 23 | +6.6% | +29.3% | +17.9% | −20.4% | +29.4% | +47.2% | +31.9% | −21.6% | +38.2% | +14.6% | −2.4% | +15.7% | +57.0% | +19.8% | −3.6% | −15.9% | +76.6% | −37.0% | +45.1% | +41.8% | +42.4% | +47.6% | +35.9% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 6 of 20 | +9.9% | +17.5% | +27.1% | −23.9% | +19.9% | +26.2% | +24.5% | +8.1% | +26.6% | +11.5% | +18.3% | −1.3% | +82.2% | +2.7% | +1.2% | +6.1% | +36.2% | −57.2% | +78.4% | +197% | — | — | — |
| BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 8 of 18 | +0.3% | +11.7% | +56.3% | −25.3% | +21.1% | +26.3% | +30.6% | +7.9% | +39.1% | +25.9% | +18.9% | +19.6% | +77.4% | +4.5% | +5.8% | −0.1% | +83.6% | −43.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | 13 of 21 | −18.5% | −21.8% | +6.1% | −31.5% | −27.5% | +51.3% | +80.7% | +5.6% | +38.3% | +32.7% | +57.0% | +8.3% | +91.7% | +23.8% | +46.8% | +52.4% | +71.1% | −36.3% | −5.5% | +18.7% | −32.8% | — | — |
| MCO Moody's Corporation | 11 of 23 | +8.7% | +22.2% | +41.5% | −28.0% | +35.6% | +23.3% | +71.3% | −4.1% | +58.5% | −4.5% | +6.1% | +23.7% | +58.3% | +51.8% | +28.9% | +0.8% | +35.5% | −43.0% | −48.0% | +13.0% | +41.9% | +44.1% | +47.2% |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 10 of 23 | +5.7% | +13.9% | +32.8% | −28.4% | +44.7% | +21.4% | +62.3% | +1.4% | +59.3% | +10.5% | +12.3% | +15.5% | +45.9% | +30.1% | +26.6% | +12.0% | +49.3% | −45.5% | −34.7% | +33.5% | +14.2% | +33.0% | +17.8% |
| XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 9 of 23 | +14.9% | +30.6% | +12.0% | −10.6% | +34.8% | −1.7% | +31.9% | −13.1% | +22.0% | +22.4% | −1.9% | +15.1% | +35.5% | +28.3% | −17.2% | +11.9% | +17.7% | −54.9% | −19.2% | +18.9% | +6.1% | +10.9% | +30.5% |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 7 of 16 | −18.2% | +16.0% | +36.2% | −22.3% | +10.8% | +39.9% | +37.9% | +13.6% | +18.3% | +5.6% | +20.0% | −2.5% | +28.9% | +27.0% | +17.8% | +12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 11 of 23 | −15.8% | +37.0% | −8.2% | −36.5% | −21.9% | +2.7% | +37.2% | +10.3% | +26.1% | +26.6% | −1.0% | +17.8% | +57.4% | +34.1% | −2.2% | +17.7% | +45.4% | +282% | +4.7% | +19.1% | +15.6% | +9.6% | +34.5% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 10 of 23 | +36.6% | +9.2% | −16.0% | +0.1% | +60.2% | +13.6% | +16.4% | −18.4% | +31.1% | +21.0% | +9.9% | +17.2% | +83.3% | +29.8% | −33.1% | −7.8% | +18.1% | −36.1% | +40.0% | +32.8% | +23.5% | +1.7% | +9.5% |
Risk and diversification
How NDAQ has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were NDAQ's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents NDAQ's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2002, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of NDAQ's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: NDAQ fell 48.0% from January to June 2006, while the S&P 500 slipped only 4.2%.
- The slowest recovery came after NDAQ fell 68.5% from December 2007 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until December 2014, six years later.
Green means NDAQ fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | NDAQ fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −68.5% | −48.8% | Dec 2007 | Nov 2008 | 11 months | Dec 2014 | 6.1 years |
| Dot-com bust | −66.2% | −6.5% | Jul 2002 | Apr 2003 | 9 months | May 2005 | 2.1 years |
| No named crash | −48.0% | −4.2% | Jan 2006 | Jun 2006 | 5 months | Oct 2007 | 16 months |
| Covid crash | −38.3% | −31.9% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | May 2020 | 2 months |
| 2022 bear market | −32.9% | −15.8% | Nov 2021 | May 2022 | 6 months | Jul 2024 | 2.2 years |
How did NDAQ do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far NDAQ, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: NDAQ began trading on July 1, 2002, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, FDS held up best, falling less than NDAQ in six of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- NDAQ began trading after the dot-com bust, but nine of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MCO's 18.5%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
- NDAQ fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when NDAQ fell 68.5% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than NDAQ.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ This pageNasdaq, Inc. | — | −5.7% | −27.8% | −37.1% | −16.7% | −6.4% | −10.1% | −16.1% | −5.3% | −68.5% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −3.7% | −16.4% | −38.6% | −18.9% | −20.4% | −17.0% | −11.8% | — | — | — |
| IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −14.3% | −33.3% | −38.0% | −18.2% | −5.6% | −32.6% | −14.2% | −2.6% | −63.7% | — |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 1 of 9 | −8.2% | −32.4% | −50.6% | −24.6% | −6.7% | −43.9% | −47.7% | 0.0% | −86.2% | −72.0% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −9.7% | −30.5% | −42.8% | −33.3% | −5.3% | −31.2% | −34.3% | 0.0% | −78.8% | −54.7% |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 2 of 7 | −19.8% | −24.7% | −60.3% | −19.8% | −4.5% | −46.0% | −28.1% | — | — | — |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 2 of 9 | −2.5% | −34.8% | −50.9% | −25.4% | −7.8% | −16.0% | −32.8% | −0.6% | −75.1% | −45.8% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 4 of 9 | −3.4% | −31.7% | −37.4% | −9.4% | −4.3% | −17.3% | −18.0% | −1.9% | −77.5% | — |
| MSCI MSCI Inc. | 3 of 8 | −2.5% | −35.8% | −32.2% | −24.6% | −6.1% | −13.3% | −26.3% | −1.7% | — | — |
| COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −15.2% | −81.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | 6 of 9 | −3.0% | −25.9% | −33.6% | −19.7% | −5.7% | −22.3% | −18.4% | −2.2% | −54.4% | −59.0% |
| MORN Morningstar, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −10.0% | −37.3% | −35.4% | −19.4% | −4.9% | −11.2% | −16.7% | −0.7% | −67.9% | — |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 8 | −7.1% | −44.3% | −47.2% | −26.7% | −3.3% | −26.4% | −30.9% | −0.9% | — | — |
| TW Tradeweb Markets Inc. | 1 of 3 | −5.9% | −44.3% | −30.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −7.2% | −40.8% | −42.3% | −25.2% | −7.1% | −19.9% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −33.0% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −7.0% | −33.8% | −33.0% | −13.3% | −9.4% | −12.7% | −19.3% | −2.0% | −73.9% | — |
| BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −3.8% | −25.4% | −31.1% | −31.2% | −4.4% | −16.7% | −18.9% | −2.4% | −59.0% | — |
| MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −44.0% | −25.5% | −13.1% | −4.1% | −12.7% | −20.1% | −3.8% | −72.8% | — |
| MCO Moody's Corporation | 3 of 9 | −3.4% | −37.6% | −42.0% | −26.1% | −4.6% | −29.3% | −27.6% | −0.7% | −69.3% | −18.5% |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 3 of 9 | −4.2% | −36.3% | −38.1% | −24.6% | −6.2% | −21.3% | −20.8% | −0.4% | −66.4% | −29.5% |
| XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2 of 9 | −9.5% | −25.8% | −42.8% | −21.9% | −7.5% | −21.9% | −26.1% | −1.1% | −81.8% | −36.6% |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 4 of 8 | −2.6% | −28.4% | −28.5% | −17.4% | −6.6% | −19.1% | −8.0% | −1.0% | — | — |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −20.2% | −38.5% | −34.7% | −13.1% | −8.0% | −23.4% | −23.3% | 0.0% | −46.4% | — |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 1 of 9 | −31.9% | −36.9% | −41.5% | −26.5% | −8.2% | −37.0% | −28.9% | −5.5% | −56.0% | −83.1% |
How closely does NDAQ move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares NDAQ with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- LPLA took just 52% of the S&P 500's losses, against 97% for NDAQ, while still keeping 110% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, NDAQ captured 104% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 97% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.91. Its share of the market's gains was slightly larger than its share of the losses.
- Five of the 21 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than NDAQ's 1.07, led by CME, LPLA and CBOE.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than NDAQ's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ This pageNasdaq, Inc. | 104% | 97% | 1.07 | 0.91 |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 50% | 11% | 4.48 | 0.33 |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 110% | 52% | 2.13 | 0.85 |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 79% | 50% | 1.59 | 0.53 |
| IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 128% | 92% | 1.40 | 1.03 |
| MSCI MSCI Inc. | 131% | 121% | 1.08 | 1.12 |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 142% | 137% | 1.04 | 1.39 |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 136% | 133% | 1.02 | 1.39 |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 89% | 90% | 0.99 | 0.91 |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 88% | 94% | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 96% | 107% | 0.90 | 1.02 |
| MCO Moody's Corporation | 131% | 151% | 0.87 | 1.26 |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 63% | 73% | 0.87 | 0.73 |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 137% | 159% | 0.86 | 1.31 |
| BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 90% | 105% | 0.85 | 0.90 |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 107% | 125% | 0.85 | 1.04 |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 127% | 157% | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| MORN Morningstar, Inc. | 93% | 117% | 0.79 | 1.07 |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 113% | 153% | 0.74 | 1.32 |
| FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | 71% | 97% | 0.73 | 0.76 |
| MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | 40% | 74% | 0.54 | 0.62 |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 54% | 150% | 0.36 | 0.82 |
What diversifies NDAQ?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with NDAQ's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing NDAQ with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in NDAQ into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+8.9% for NDAQ alone, +13.0% for the mix).
- FIX made money in five of the six calendar years in which NDAQ lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of NDAQ over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.44 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which NDAQ lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% NDAQ and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2009 | 2008 | 2006 | 2003 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +52.9% | 0.47 | −3.7% | −11.2% | −19.8% | −50.1% | −12.5% | −5.3% | 26.2% | +8.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.32 | +119% | 1.48 | +17.4% | +3.8% | — | — | — | — | 21.6% | +11.0% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.05 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +6.0% | +2.0% | −20.8% | — | — | 21.2% | +13.0% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.44 | +101% | 1.04 | +8.0% | +10.4% | — | — | — | — | 22.4% | +10.7% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.23 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | −33.5% | +60.5% | −44.7% | −6.7% | +87.3% | 23.6% | +15.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.39 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | −5.1% | — | — | — | — | 21.9% | +10.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.17 | +126% | 0.96 | +12.7% | −0.8% | +24.0% | +4.9% | +22.6% | — | 21.8% | +11.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.37 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | −10.4% | — | — | — | — | 22.8% | +11.9% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.24 | +177% | 0.93 | −0.6% | +64.4% | +21.8% | −39.0% | +18.0% | +25.9% | 22.8% | +12.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2009 | 2008 | 2006 | 2003 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +52.9% | 0.47 | −3.7% | −11.2% | −19.8% | −50.1% | −12.5% | −5.3% | 26.2% | +8.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.09 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | +54.1% | −4.4% | −39.6% | −5.8% | +3.5% | 22.1% | +15.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.18 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | +1.3% | +105% | −20.5% | −26.0% | +6.9% | 25.8% | +27.6% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.26 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +17.0% | +17.8% | −15.2% | +38.9% | +63.6% | 24.9% | +23.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.13 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | +51.8% | +62.9% | −40.4% | −1.2% | +19.9% | 22.2% | +14.6% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.20 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | +86.6% | — | — | — | — | 23.2% | +17.2% |
Common questions
What was NDAQ's worst drawdown?
NDAQ's deepest decline since it began trading in 2002 was 68.5%, from December 2007 to November 2008. It took about six years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were NDAQ's best and worst years?
Over 23 full calendar years, NDAQ's best year was 2005, when it returned 245%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -50.1%.
Is there a better investment than NDAQ?
Among NDAQ's popular alternatives, CME earned more than NDAQ with less volatility over the past 5 years: 11.2% a year at 20.8% volatility, against 8.9% a year at 24.7%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RY (banks) and TD (banks) earned more than NDAQ with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 8.9% a year at 24.7%.
Is NDAQ more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. NDAQ's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.7%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NDAQ's return lands within 24.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is NDAQ's Sharpe ratio?
NDAQ's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.47, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NDAQ earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is NDAQ with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, NDAQ's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.59 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NDAQ instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NDAQ holding.
What are the best alternatives to NDAQ?
Of the 23 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed NDAQ in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CBOE.
Did NDAQ outperform the S&P 500?
NDAQ finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 15 of 23 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +27.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did NDAQ do in stock market crashes?
NDAQ fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when NDAQ fell 68.5% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies NDAQ?
These had a low correlation with NDAQ over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.32), DXJ (correlation 0.05) and EMLP (correlation 0.44); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.09), CLS (correlation 0.18) and FIX (correlation 0.26). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than NDAQ's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of NDAQ's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.