Relative Intelligence · Chemicals

How Linde (LIN) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on LIN alone. It places LIN (Linde plc) against 12 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where LIN stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: LIN's full trading record, from June 1992 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowLIN has trailed the market, rising 1.4% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its chemical peers split over the past 6 months: APLE (Apple Hospitality REIT) rose 39.9%, while APTV (Aptiv) fell 25.9%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?LIN fell 1.7% over the past 3 months, 4.5 points behind the chemicals ETF XLB (State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF), which rose 2.9%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. On the flip side, LIN rose 9.7% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsA ahead of 81% of stocks worth at least $300 million over 10 years, but behind 55% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 3 years. Over the past year, LIN rose 12.7% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (42.4% against 89.3%). Market rank ↓
- Long termLIN turned $10,000 into $49,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. That said, over 5 years LIN trailed the index: 72.6% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashLIN fell less than the S&P 500 in six of seven sell-offs, but the 2015 China and oil sell-off broke the pattern: it fell 16.6%, more than the S&P 500's 12.8%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationLIN is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.56 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.56 with the total US market, more closely than 85% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years LIN kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 90% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 73% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.76. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing) and APG (APi Group) were ahead of LIN in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.5% and 31.9% volatility against 20.9%).
- Nearby categories and themes
- XOM (Exxonmobil, integrated oil & gas) and CVX (Chevron, integrated oil & gas) were ahead of LIN in most short and long periods.
- Whole market
- 112 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than LIN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF), BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway) and BRK-A (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in LIN have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in LIN over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of LIN over the same span and LIN's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in LIN at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $307,585 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of LIN, and AAPL finished highest, at $20,534,853.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 197 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of LIN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- MSFT$508,386+4,984% total · +14.5% a year
- PH$505,227+4,952% total · +14.5% a year
- RY$442,765+4,328% total · +14.0% a year
- ECL$316,339+3,063% total · +12.6% a year
- LIN$307,585+2,976% total · +12.5% a year
- APD$141,485+1,315% total · +9.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- DD$46,604+366% total · +5.5% a year
- APOG$25,913+159% total · +3.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,160 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of LIN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- XOM$32,965+230% total · +26.9% a year
- APG$28,446+184% total · +23.3% a year
- SHEL$25,892+159% total · +21.0% a year
- CVX$24,595+146% total · +19.7% a year
- APO$20,759+108% total · +15.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- LIN$17,312+73.1% total · +11.6% a year
- DD$16,760+67.6% total · +10.9% a year
- ECL$13,921+39.2% total · +6.8% a year
LIN at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- LIN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1992 was 51.8%, from June to November 2008. It took 25 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, LIN's best was 2007, when it returned 52.0%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 31.7%. It lost money in six of those years.
- LIN is 7.9% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $231B
- Industry
- Chemicals - Specialty
- Price history from
- June 1992
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +12.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +42.4%+12.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +72.6%+11.5% a year
- Past 10 years
- +394%+17.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +52.0%2007
- Worst calendar year
- −31.7%2008
- Losing years
- 6 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 20.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.63return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −51.8%Jun 2008 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −7.9%below the peak
LIN against the whole market
Where LIN ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does LIN rank among all stocks?
This section ranks LIN on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how LIN stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- LIN's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 2% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | LIN | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +12.7% | 1,482 of 3,287 | top 45% |
| 3-year return | +42.4% | 1,661 of 3,017 | bottom 46% |
| 5-year return | +72.6% | 880 of 2,893 | top 30% |
| 10-year return | +394% | 425 of 2,202 | top 19% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 20.9% | 120 of 2,893 | top 4% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.63 | 615 of 2,893 | top 21% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −32.6% | 39 of 2,187 | top 2% |
What has beaten LIN on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). LIN sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than LIN with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Ten stocks and 102 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than LIN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 3% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half LIN's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 47% less than LIN's 20.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.63 for LIN. DXJ earned the most, 26.6% a year, while still swinging less than LIN (19.1% against 20.9%).
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to LIN; faint dots are 51 more of the 112 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× LIN's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than LIN?
Investments that beat LIN over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among LIN's popular alternatives, TSM and APG were ahead of LIN in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.5% and 31.9% volatility against 20.9%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, XOM (integrated oil & gas) and CVX (integrated oil & gas) were ahead of LIN in most short and long periods.
- Across the whole market, 112 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than LIN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VOO, BRK-B and BRK-A.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat LIN over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks LIN's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than LIN follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than LIN's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× LIN's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than LIN's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with LIN?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.56 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against LIN. 2 of 12 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.31 | — | ||
APGAPi Group Corporation · Engineering & Construction | Higher return in most periods | +23.0% | 31.9% | 0.81 | −49.6% | — | 0.56 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Chemicals and the categories next to it (Specialty Chemicals, Industrial Machinery, Agricultural Products, Integrated Oil & Gas), plus LIN's specific themes. 13 of 77 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.19 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | 0.33 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.30 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 443 of 3,544 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.50 | — | ||
DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.59 | 0.27% | |
AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.66 | 0.15% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.38 | — | ||
BKLCBNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.8% | 17.3% | 0.84 | −26.2% | — | 0.54 | 0.00% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.39 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.59 | — | ||
QSPTFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September · Multi-Asset | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.1% | 14.8% | 0.85 | −22.6% | — | 0.43 | 0.90% | |
What these numbers mean for LIN
- Annual return
- LIN returned 11.5% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $17,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- LIN's volatility over the past 5 years was 20.9%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, LIN's return lands within 20.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- LIN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.63, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so LIN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- LIN's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 32.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 32.6% fall takes a 48.3% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, LIN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.56 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against LIN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a LIN holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 112 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than LIN with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 59 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with LIN | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.50 | — | |
| 2 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.59 | 0.27% |
| 3 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.66 | 0.15% |
| 4 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.38 | — | |
| 5 | BKLCBNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.8% | 17.3% | 0.84 | −26.2% | — | 0.54 | 0.00% |
| 6 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.39 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.61 | — | |
| 8 | FFLCFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +15.7% | 16.8% | 0.95 | −19.7% | — | 0.55 | 0.38% |
| 9 | SIXAETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.8% | 12.7% | 1.01 | −18.4% | — | 0.73 | 0.31% |
| 10 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.41 | 0.48% |
| 11 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.60 | 0.40% |
| 12 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.43 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.39 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.68 | — | |
| 15 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.15 | 0.80% |
| 16 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.20 | 0.40% | |
| 17 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.62 | 0.25% |
| 18 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.64 | 0.56% |
| 19 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.65 | 0.08% |
| 20 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.58 | 0.36% |
| 21 | MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +12.6% | 13.4% | 0.95 | −35.4% | +244% | 0.72 | 0.05% |
| 22 | AMLPAlerian MLP ETF · Energy Equity | Whole market | +16.1% | 18.9% | 0.89 | −72.9% | +91.0% | 0.39 | 1.01% |
| 23 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.64 | 0.39% |
| 24 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.60 | 0.15% |
| 25 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.66 | 0.35% |
| 26 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.45 | 0.40% |
| 27 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.62 | 0.43% |
| 28 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.67 | 0.12% |
| 29 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.52 | 0.15% |
| 30 | IDViShares International Select Dividend ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +12.8% | 15.5% | 0.86 | −42.5% | +159% | 0.51 | 0.50% |
| 31 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.58 | 0.60% |
| 32 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Whole market | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +186% | 0.56 | 0.45% |
| 33 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.63 | 0.20% |
| 34 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.72 | 0.25% |
| 35 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | 0.12 | 0.98% |
| 36 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.48 | 0.45% |
| 37 | WTVWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.0% | 0.83 | −42.2% | +303% | 0.60 | 0.12% |
| 38 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.64 | 0.09% |
| 39 | HDEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +12.8% | 14.2% | 0.92 | −36.4% | +134% | 0.60 | 0.09% |
| 40 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.62 | 0.05% |
| 41 | PWVInvesco Large Cap Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.2% | 0.97 | −37.6% | +223% | 0.66 | 0.55% |
| 42 | JMOMJPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.1% | 0.73 | −34.3% | — | 0.60 | 0.12% |
| 43 | AUSFGlobal X - Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF · International | Whole market | +13.2% | 13.6% | 0.99 | −44.2% | — | 0.66 | 0.27% |
| 44 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.6% | 0.85 | −41.3% | — | 0.61 | 0.18% |
| 45 | HEWJiShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF · International | Whole market | +20.8% | 19.4% | 1.08 | −31.5% | +346% | 0.42 | 1.02% |
| 46 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.50 | 0.50% |
| 47 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.72 | 0.19% |
| 48 | FDRRFidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.6% | 15.0% | 0.87 | −36.5% | +265% | 0.55 | 0.15% |
| 49 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · International | Whole market | +13.8% | 15.1% | 0.94 | −34.4% | +261% | 0.65 | 0.50% |
| 50 | FYLDCambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.0% | 0.85 | −44.6% | +203% | 0.56 | 0.59% |
| 51 | FDDFirst Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.6% | 18.5% | 0.74 | −41.4% | +175% | 0.49 | 0.56% |
| 52 | IDOGALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 15.6% | 0.93 | −37.3% | +180% | 0.54 | 0.50% |
| 53 | QDEFNorthern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.7% | 0.94 | −35.7% | +228% | 0.68 | 0.40% |
| 54 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.44 | 0.70% |
| 55 | GVALCambria Global Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.4% | 18.7% | 0.82 | −46.8% | +173% | 0.56 | 0.68% |
| 56 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.54 | — |
| 57 | LLoews Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.3% | 19.2% | 0.80 | −48.5% | +180% | 0.48 | — |
| 58 | PPAInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETF · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 18.9% | 0.90 | −43.9% | +344% | 0.50 | 0.58% |
| 59 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.61 | 0.95% |
LIN against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against LIN, compared period by period and year by year.
How do LIN's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at LIN, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 12 popular alternatives earned more than LIN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Ten of the 12 popular alternatives earned less than LIN over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, LIN returned 11.5% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (20.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than LIN with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| APG APi Group Corporation | +23.0% | 31.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| LIN This pageLinde plc | +11.5% | 20.9% |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | +10.5% | 37.3% |
| DD DuPont de Nemours, Inc. | +9.8% | 30.0% |
| APLE Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. | +9.0% | 26.8% |
| ECL Ecolab Inc. | +6.7% | 24.1% |
| APOG Apogee Enterprises, Inc. | +4.2% | 37.9% |
| APD Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | +3.2% | 26.4% |
| ATR AptarGroup, Inc. | +0.9% | 22.6% |
| LYB LyondellBasell Industries N.V. | −2.0% | 33.1% |
| DOW Dow Inc. | −7.6% | 34.1% |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | −23.2% | 41.4% |
Has LIN consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares LIN with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than LIN helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- TSM outperformed LIN in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Only one of the 12 popular alternatives, TSM, outperformed LIN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than LIN over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| LIN Linde plc (this page) | — | +9.7% | −1.7% | +1.4% | +18.1% | +12.7% | +42.4% | +72.6% | +394% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | — | $231B | — |
| TSM QualifiedTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| APG Engineering & ConstructionAPi Group Corporation | 2/5 short2/3 long | +6.8% | +1.5% | −17.9% | +2.6% | +14.8% | +137% | +182% | — | 31.9% | 0.81 | −49.6% | — | $17B | — |
| ECL Chemicals - SpecialtyEcolab Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +6.7% | +7.5% | +5.1% | +10.6% | +4.0% | +85.8% | +38.1% | +176% | 24.1% | 0.39 | −43.7% | — | $81B | — |
| DD ChemicalsDuPont de Nemours, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +2.4% | −1.6% | −4.9% | +9.8% | +33.2% | +53.7% | +59.2% | +65.8% | 30.0% | 0.46 | −73.0% | — | $18B | — |
| APO Asset ManagementApollo Global Management, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −13.0% | −5.5% | −11.9% | −23.2% | −9.7% | +41.4% | +64.9% | +825% | 37.3% | 0.46 | −53.5% | — | $66B | — |
| APLE REIT - Hotel & MotelApple Hospitality REIT, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +14.2% | +7.0% | +39.9% | +55.5% | +64.1% | +41.8% | +53.8% | +68.3% | 26.8% | 0.46 | −71.9% | — | $4.2B | — |
| APOG Construction MaterialsApogee Enterprises, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +17.4% | +10.1% | +21.1% | +18.8% | +17.1% | +10.1% | +23.1% | +25.5% | 37.9% | 0.30 | −74.6% | — | $901M | — |
| APD Chemicals - SpecialtyAir Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +9.0% | +2.7% | +3.5% | +23.1% | +22.2% | +17.4% | +16.9% | +188% | 26.4% | 0.25 | −31.8% | — | $67B | — |
| LYB Chemicals - SpecialtyLyondellBasell Industries N.V. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +6.2% | +6.4% | −4.8% | +48.9% | +49.0% | −15.5% | −9.4% | +38.3% | 33.1% | 0.11 | −68.2% | — | $21B | — |
| DOW ChemicalsDow Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +8.6% | +2.2% | −14.7% | +30.8% | +48.8% | −25.6% | −32.7% | — | 34.1% | -0.06 | −64.4% | — | $22B | — |
| ATR Medical - Instruments & SuppliesAptarGroup, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.9% | −2.8% | −3.2% | +3.8% | −1.8% | +7.0% | +4.8% | +89.0% | 22.6% | 0.15 | −39.8% | — | $8.0B | — |
| APTV Auto - PartsAptiv PLC | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | −21.4% | −25.9% | −42.6% | −46.0% | −51.0% | −73.3% | −10.6% | 41.4% | -0.43 | −75.8% | — | $9.4B | — |
How did LIN do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where LIN ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with LIN and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Among its popular alternatives, APG came out ahead of LIN most often, in four of the five years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, LIN finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 6 of 13.
- LIN finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 19 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of LIN; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places LIN among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of LIN | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN This pageLinde plc | — | +3.2% | +3.2% | +27.7% | −4.4% | +33.4% | +25.9% | +39.1% | +3.0% | +35.1% | +17.5% | −19.0% | +1.6% | +21.3% | +4.5% | +14.2% | +21.5% | +38.4% | −31.8% | +52.0% | +14.0% | +21.8% | +17.3% | +34.4% | +5.9% | +26.3% | −10.3% | +44.4% | −20.7% | −1.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 29 | 6 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 5 of 13 | 4 of 13 | 4 of 13 | 3 of 12 | 5 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 4 of 11 | 5 of 11 | 9 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 2 of 8 | 3 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 1 of 7 | 6 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 7 of 7 | 5 of 6 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 18 of 28 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +52.9% | −16.1% | −4.3% | +18.9% | +27.1% | −4.2% | +56.7% | −54.8% | +39.5% | −51.0% | +290% | +13.4% | — |
| APG APi Group Corporation | 4 of 5 | +59.6% | +4.0% | +84.0% | −27.0% | +42.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ECL Ecolab Inc. | 15 of 29 | +13.2% | +19.3% | +37.9% | −37.1% | +9.4% | +13.2% | +32.3% | +11.1% | +15.8% | +3.7% | +10.7% | +1.3% | +46.6% | +25.9% | +16.3% | +14.6% | +28.7% | −30.5% | +14.5% | +25.9% | +4.4% | +29.7% | +11.9% | +24.4% | −5.5% | +11.9% | +9.3% | +32.3% | +49.7% |
| DD DuPont de Nemours, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +28.7% | +1.0% | +14.3% | −13.3% | +15.4% | +13.3% | −14.3% | −23.7% | +26.2% | +13.9% | +15.8% | +4.9% | +40.7% | +15.4% | −14.0% | +25.4% | +88.0% | −60.2% | +1.4% | −6.5% | −9.6% | +21.8% | +44.0% | −9.4% | −5.2% | −15.6% | +50.2% | −8.0% | +33.0% |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 8 of 14 | −11.1% | +79.9% | +49.5% | −9.6% | +53.3% | +8.0% | +107% | −22.0% | +85.4% | +37.3% | −29.3% | −15.9% | +112% | +54.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| APLE Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −16.6% | −1.4% | +12.2% | +2.5% | +25.4% | −18.9% | +21.9% | −21.8% | +4.0% | +6.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| APOG Apogee Enterprises, Inc. | 13 of 29 | −47.8% | +35.8% | +22.8% | −5.7% | +55.2% | +0.5% | +10.9% | −33.8% | −13.7% | +24.6% | +3.6% | +19.4% | +51.8% | +99.7% | −6.5% | −1.2% | +38.8% | −38.1% | −10.4% | +21.1% | +23.2% | +20.6% | +29.9% | −42.5% | +201% | +11.3% | −54.1% | −3.8% | −39.6% |
| APD Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 12 of 29 | −12.7% | +8.1% | −8.9% | +3.9% | +13.8% | +18.8% | +50.0% | +0.3% | +17.1% | +22.5% | −7.6% | +32.1% | +36.9% | +1.7% | −3.8% | +15.0% | +65.5% | −47.8% | +42.8% | +21.1% | +4.3% | +12.0% | +26.1% | −7.2% | +16.7% | +24.9% | −14.3% | −1.0% | +20.8% |
| LYB LyondellBasell Industries N.V. | 4 of 15 | −36.0% | −17.4% | +20.7% | −1.0% | +5.1% | +2.6% | +19.4% | −21.7% | +33.8% | +2.9% | +13.2% | +1.8% | +44.7% | +92.5% | +10.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DOW Dow Inc. | 0 of 6 | −37.4% | −22.8% | +14.7% | −6.6% | +6.8% | +7.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ATR AptarGroup, Inc. | 11 of 29 | −21.4% | +28.6% | +13.9% | −8.9% | −9.5% | +19.9% | +24.5% | +10.5% | +19.3% | +2.8% | +10.6% | +0.3% | +44.6% | −7.0% | +11.5% | +35.3% | +3.3% | −12.4% | +40.4% | +15.0% | +0.3% | +36.9% | +25.8% | −10.0% | +20.1% | +17.9% | −9.9% | +1.6% | +58.8% |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | 8 of 14 | +25.8% | −32.6% | −3.7% | −43.5% | +26.6% | +37.5% | +55.9% | −27.1% | +57.6% | −20.1% | +19.3% | +22.7% | +59.4% | +77.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How LIN has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were LIN's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents LIN's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1992, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In four of LIN's five worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: LIN fell 45.0% from July 1997 to September 1998, while the S&P 500 rose 19.2%.
- The slowest recovery came after LIN fell 51.8% from June to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until December 2010, two years later.
Green means LIN fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | LIN fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −51.8% | −42.3% | Jun 2008 | Nov 2008 | 5 months | Dec 2010 | 2.1 years |
| No named crash | −45.0% | +19.2% | Jul 1997 | Sep 1998 | 14 months | May 1999 | 8 months |
| No named crash | −44.5% | +4.7% | May 1999 | Mar 2000 | 10 months | Jan 2002 | 22 months |
| Covid crash | −32.6% | −33.4% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jul 2020 | 4 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −26.1% | −0.5% | Jun 2014 | Jan 2016 | 19 months | May 2017 | 16 months |
How did LIN do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far LIN, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- LIN fell less than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when LIN fell 33.5% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than LIN in most of the crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than LIN.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN This pageLinde plc | — | −5.3% | −22.8% | −32.3% | −11.9% | −7.2% | −16.6% | −15.4% | −0.6% | −51.8% | −33.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 5 of 10 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| APG APi Group Corporation | 0 of 2 | −8.6% | −49.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ECL Ecolab Inc. | 4 of 10 | −1.3% | −39.2% | −40.3% | −13.8% | −6.8% | −16.3% | −16.1% | 0.0% | −41.9% | −30.0% |
| DD DuPont de Nemours, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −4.0% | −40.2% | −46.4% | −29.2% | −5.1% | −27.0% | −39.8% | −4.5% | −85.7% | −40.6% |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 0 of 7 | −17.9% | −35.5% | −48.9% | −35.7% | −10.8% | −40.0% | −44.2% | — | — | — |
| APLE Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −7.6% | −23.9% | −67.7% | −19.3% | −5.6% | −16.1% | — | — | — | — |
| APOG Apogee Enterprises, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −9.3% | −26.7% | −57.8% | −37.6% | −5.4% | −40.0% | −34.4% | −2.9% | −78.2% | −46.7% |
| APD Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −3.1% | −28.3% | −30.9% | −12.5% | −6.2% | −20.6% | −19.0% | −1.8% | −60.3% | −30.0% |
| LYB LyondellBasell Industries N.V. | 0 of 8 | −7.5% | −34.8% | −57.5% | −24.9% | −7.0% | −25.5% | −39.9% | −4.3% | — | — |
| DOW Dow Inc. | 0 of 3 | −6.9% | −37.1% | −54.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ATR AptarGroup, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −2.9% | −23.7% | −27.0% | −18.5% | −5.1% | −11.9% | −19.0% | −2.5% | −44.4% | −35.0% |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | 1 of 6 | −5.7% | −55.1% | −63.2% | −33.4% | −6.0% | −35.7% | — | — | — | — |
How closely does LIN move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares LIN with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, LIN captured 90% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 73% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.76. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only TSM had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than LIN's 1.23, out of ten popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than LIN's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN This pageLinde plc | 90% | 73% | 1.23 | 0.76 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 166% | 168% | 0.99 | 1.58 |
| ATR AptarGroup, Inc. | 44% | 49% | 0.91 | 0.52 |
| ECL Ecolab Inc. | 75% | 86% | 0.87 | 0.94 |
| APD Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 81% | 95% | 0.85 | 0.76 |
| APLE Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. | 64% | 99% | 0.65 | 1.08 |
| DD DuPont de Nemours, Inc. | 96% | 151% | 0.63 | 1.28 |
| LYB LyondellBasell Industries N.V. | 80% | 141% | 0.57 | 0.91 |
| APOG Apogee Enterprises, Inc. | 62% | 125% | 0.50 | 1.14 |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | 106% | 219% | 0.48 | 1.80 |
What diversifies LIN?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with LIN's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing LIN with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in LIN into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 15% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+11.6% for LIN alone, +13.4% for the mix).
- CAH made money in five of the six calendar years in which LIN lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and GLD have moved largely independently of LIN over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.41 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which LIN lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% LIN and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2015 | 2008 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN Linde plc (this page) | 1.00 | +72.6% | 0.63 | −4.4% | −19.0% | −31.8% | −10.3% | −20.7% | −1.6% | 19.7% | +11.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.41 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +7.7% | −20.8% | — | — | — | 17.0% | +14.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.38 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −0.3% | −44.7% | — | — | — | 19.4% | +17.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.20 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −10.7% | +4.9% | — | — | — | 16.8% | +13.4% |
| IOO InternationaliShares Global 100 ETF | 0.45 | +107% | 0.94 | −16.3% | −1.8% | −36.1% | — | — | — | 17.4% | +12.9% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.36 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −21.5% | −39.0% | +24.4% | — | — | 18.3% | +14.4% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.38 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | −12.9% | −45.3% | — | — | — | 18.3% | +14.1% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.39 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −25.7% | — | — | — | — | 17.5% | +13.3% |
| EDIV InternationalState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 0.43 | +69.9% | 0.84 | −15.3% | −27.4% | — | — | — | — | 17.0% | +11.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2015 | 2008 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN Linde plc (this page) | 1.00 | +72.6% | 0.63 | −4.4% | −19.0% | −31.8% | −10.3% | −20.7% | −1.6% | 19.7% | +11.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.27 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | +12.6% | −39.6% | +108% | +51.7% | +29.1% | 17.9% | +17.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.01 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −6.0% | −20.5% | −2.3% | — | — | 19.7% | +30.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.44 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +67.7% | −15.2% | −71.1% | −9.5% | — | 21.3% | +25.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.18 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −4.5% | −40.4% | +61.2% | +46.9% | +96.3% | 17.4% | +16.6% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.26 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | 18.5% | +19.2% |
Common questions
What was LIN's worst drawdown?
LIN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1992 was 51.8%, from June to November 2008. It took 25 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were LIN's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, LIN's best year was 2007, when it returned 52.0%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -31.7%.
Is there a better investment than LIN?
Among LIN's popular alternatives, TSM and APG were ahead of LIN in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.5% and 31.9% volatility against 20.9%). Looking beyond its popular alternatives, XOM (integrated oil & gas) and CVX (integrated oil & gas) were ahead of LIN in most short and long periods.
Is LIN more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. LIN's volatility over the past 5 years was 20.9%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, LIN's return lands within 20.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is LIN's Sharpe ratio?
LIN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.63, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so LIN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is LIN with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, LIN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.56 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against LIN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a LIN holding.
What are the best alternatives to LIN?
Of the 12 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed LIN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: TSM.
Did LIN outperform the S&P 500?
LIN finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 19 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +3.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did LIN do in stock market crashes?
LIN fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when LIN fell 33.5% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies LIN?
These had a low correlation with LIN over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.41), SMH (correlation 0.38) and GLD (correlation 0.20); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.27), CLS (correlation 0.01) and FIX (correlation 0.44). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than LIN's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of LIN's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to LIN
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
ECLEcolab
APOApollo Global Management
APDAir Products and Chemicals