Relative Intelligence · Financial Data

How Moody's (MCO) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on MCO alone. It places MCO (Moody's Corporation) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where MCO stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: MCO's full trading record, from October 1994 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowMCO has gone against the market, falling 5.7% over the past 3 months while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?MCO fell 5.7% over the past 3 months, less than the 1.35 beta versus the S&P 500 would have implied (5.2%).
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, MCO rose 1.1% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (57.3% against 89.3%). The last two calendar years both went the same way: MCO rose 8.7% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termMCO turned $10,000 into $48,300 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. That said, over 5 years MCO trailed the index: 33.4% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, MCO has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, MCO has a correlation of 0.82 over 5 years, more closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Over 10 years, MCO's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.26: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.3 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.5 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- CBOE (Cboe Global Markets), NDAQ (Nasdaq) and CME (CME Group) earned more than MCO with less volatility over the past 5 years. CBOE returned 21.5% a year at 25.1% volatility, against 5.9% a year at 26.9%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CTAS (Cintas, business services) and SEIC (SEI Investments, asset management) earned more than MCO with less volatility over the past 5 years. CTAS returned 16.5% a year at 23.1% volatility, against 5.9% a year at 26.9%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 5.9% at 26.9% for MCO.
How much would $10,000 in MCO have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in MCO over the past 24 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of MCO over the same span and MCO's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 24 years rather than MCO's full 29 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in MCO at the end of September 2002 would have grown to $239,916 by September 2026, more than the $144,215 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of MCO, and BLK finished highest, at $434,103.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2002 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 314 of the 1,370 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MCO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BLK$434,103+4,241% total · +17.0% a year
- MSFT$384,530+3,745% total · +16.4% a year
- NDAQ$374,031+3,640% total · +16.3% a year
- CDNS$324,675+3,147% total · +15.6% a year
- CTAS$251,989+2,420% total · +14.4% a year
- MCO$239,916+2,299% total · +14.2% a year
- FDS$196,174+1,862% total · +13.2% a year
- SPGI$194,414+1,844% total · +13.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$144,215+1,342% total · +11.8% a year
- TRI$70,274+603% total · +8.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,896 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MCO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CBOE$23,731+137% total · +18.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- CME$16,716+67.2% total · +10.8% a year
- NDAQ$15,317+53.2% total · +8.9% a year
- BLK$14,247+42.5% total · +7.3% a year
- MCO$13,345+33.5% total · +5.9% a year
- KRE$11,755+17.5% total · +3.3% a year
- BX$11,476+14.8% total · +2.8% a year
- MSCI$9,376−6.2% total · −1.3% a year
MCO at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- MCO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1994 was 78.7%, from February 2007 to November 2008. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, MCO's best was 2019, when it returned 71.3%, and its worst was 2007, when it lost 48.0%. It lost money in six of those years.
- MCO is 11.3% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $82B
- Industry
- Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
- Price history from
- October 1994
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +1.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +57.3%+16.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +33.4%+5.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- +383%+17.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +71.3%2019
- Worst calendar year
- −48.0%2007
- Losing years
- 6 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 26.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.35return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −78.7%Feb 2007 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −11.3%below the peak
MCO against the whole market
Where MCO ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does MCO rank among all stocks?
This section ranks MCO on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how MCO stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- MCO's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 9% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | MCO | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +1.1% | 1,945 of 3,287 | bottom 42% |
| 3-year return | +57.3% | 1,439 of 3,017 | top 48% |
| 5-year return | +33.4% | 1,296 of 2,893 | top 45% |
| 10-year return | +383% | 441 of 2,202 | top 20% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 26.9% | 474 of 2,893 | top 16% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.35 | 1,405 of 2,893 | top 49% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −42.0% | 203 of 2,187 | top 9% |
What has beaten MCO on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). MCO sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than MCO with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 167 stocks and 514 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than MCO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 19% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half MCO's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 8% less than MCO's 26.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.35 for MCO.
- Among MCO's popular alternatives, CBOE, CME and NDAQ are in the region. CBOE earned 21.5% a year against 5.9% a year for MCO, at 25.1% volatility, 7% less than MCO's 26.9%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to MCO; faint dots are 92 more of the 681 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than MCO?
Investments that beat MCO over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among MCO's popular alternatives, CBOE, NDAQ and CME earned more than MCO with less volatility over the past 5 years. CBOE returned 21.5% a year at 25.1% volatility, against 5.9% a year at 26.9%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CTAS (business services) and SEIC (asset management) earned more than MCO with less volatility over the past 5 years. CTAS returned 16.5% a year at 23.1% volatility, against 5.9% a year at 26.9%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 5.9% at 26.9% for MCO.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat MCO over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks MCO's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than MCO follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than MCO's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× MCO's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than MCO's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with MCO?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +5.9% | 26.9% | 0.35 | −42.0% | +383% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.82 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 5 shownThe investments people most often weigh against MCO. 5 of 17 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.28 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +8.9% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | +407% | 0.69 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.24 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +7.1% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | +313% | 0.77 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +0.1% | 31.3% | 0.16 | −43.7% | +702% | 0.71 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Financial Data and the categories next to it (Capital Markets, Business Services, Asset Management, Software), plus MCO's specific themes. 24 of 129 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.58 | — | ||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.45 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.66 | — | ||
SEICSEI Investments Company · Asset Management | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 22.3% | 0.65 | −51.8% | +168% | 0.67 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.1% | 27.8% | 0.55 | −53.9% | +507% | 0.71 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +1,139% | 0.47 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,204 of 3,487 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.42 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.61 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.70 | 0.18% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.44 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.66 | 0.09% | ||
JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.42 | 0.20% | |
What these numbers mean for MCO
- Annual return
- MCO returned 5.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $13,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- MCO's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.9%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MCO's return lands within 26.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- MCO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.35, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MCO earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- MCO's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 42.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 42.0% fall takes a 72.5% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, MCO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.82 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MCO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MCO holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 681 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than MCO with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with MCO | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.42 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.61 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.63 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.70 | 0.18% | |
| 5 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.50 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.44 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.45 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.57 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.46 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.77 | 0.04% | |
| 11 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.83 | 0.03% | |
| 12 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.82 | 0.03% | |
| 13 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.49 | — | |
| 14 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.67 | 0.40% |
| 15 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.67 | 0.50% |
| 16 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.22 | — | |
| 17 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.56 | 0.40% |
| 18 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.37 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.71 | 0.05% | |
| 20 | PWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.8% | 22.2% | 0.74 | −32.4% | +409% | 0.67 | 0.55% |
| 21 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.40 | — | |
| 22 | ILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.2% | 22.4% | 0.59 | −35.4% | +403% | 0.74 | 0.04% |
| 23 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.74 | 0.03% | |
| 24 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.29 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.23 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.74 | 0.03% | |
| 27 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.82 | 0.19% |
| 28 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.84 | 0.04% | |
| 29 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.67 | 0.06% | |
| 30 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.25 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.82 | 0.06% | |
| 32 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.62 | — | |
| 33 | FJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.5% | 10.9% | 1.06 | −13.1% | — | 0.84 | 0.85% |
| 34 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.35 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.83 | 0.26% | |
| 36 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.55 | 0.13% |
| 37 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.62 | 0.27% |
| 38 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.76 | 0.15% |
| 39 | DFATDimensional - US Targeted Value ETF · US Small-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.6% | 21.0% | 0.54 | −26.1% | — | 0.71 | 0.33% |
| 40 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | 0.37 | — |
| 41 | FTSFortis Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.4% | 16.4% | 0.58 | −34.3% | +154% | 0.43 | — |
| 42 | AVEMAvantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.5% | 0.56 | −36.0% | — | 0.50 | 0.33% |
| 43 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.75 | 0.20% |
| 44 | EWJiShares MSCI Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.2% | 18.8% | 0.57 | −33.1% | +132% | 0.62 | 0.49% |
| 45 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.54 | — | |
| 46 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.80 | 0.39% |
| 47 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.73 | 0.35% |
| 48 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.77 | 0.40% |
| 49 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.82 | 0.12% |
| 50 | DIVOAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +11.1% | 11.9% | 0.95 | −30.0% | — | 0.75 | 0.56% |
| 51 | Whole market | +8.3% | 23.3% | 0.46 | −40.5% | +446% | 0.66 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +10.9% | 24.2% | 0.55 | −44.4% | +516% | 0.52 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.32 | — | |
| 54 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.45 | — |
| 55 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.72 | 0.60% |
| 56 | BBEUJPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +8.9% | 17.5% | 0.57 | −36.3% | — | 0.74 | 0.09% |
| 57 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.78 | 0.12% |
| 58 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.47 | — | |
| 59 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.73 | 0.25% |
| 60 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | 0.12 | 0.98% |
| 61 | XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF · US Mid-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.7% | 20.5% | 0.56 | −36.9% | +240% | 0.72 | 0.30% |
| 62 | OMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Whole market | +9.0% | 16.4% | 0.61 | −33.2% | — | 0.77 | 0.29% |
| 63 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.75 | 0.45% |
| 64 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.73 | 0.09% |
| 65 | HDEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +12.8% | 14.2% | 0.92 | −36.4% | +134% | 0.63 | 0.09% |
| 66 | AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +8.6% | 13.1% | 0.69 | −28.4% | +165% | 0.83 | 0.19% |
| 67 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.79 | 0.05% |
| 68 | FVFirst Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.7% | 21.1% | 0.55 | −34.0% | +247% | 0.67 | 0.30% |
| 69 | FLQLFranklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.8% | 16.3% | 0.88 | −33.6% | — | 0.78 | 0.15% |
| 70 | JMOMJPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.1% | 0.73 | −34.3% | — | 0.73 | 0.12% |
| 71 | HFXINYLI FTSE International Equity Currency Neutral ETF · International | Whole market | +11.4% | 15.3% | 0.79 | −32.4% | +180% | 0.70 | 0.19% |
| 72 | NULVNuveen ESG Large-Cap Value · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.2% | 14.2% | 0.69 | −37.0% | — | 0.78 | 0.26% |
| 73 | FBTFirst Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund · Healthcare | Whole market | +10.8% | 22.2% | 0.58 | −33.3% | +203% | 0.55 | 0.55% |
| 74 | DSTLDistillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 16.1% | 0.75 | −33.1% | — | 0.80 | 0.39% |
| 75 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 22.8% | 0.77 | −32.3% | +286% | 0.46 | — |
| 76 | DDWMWisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund · International | Whole market | +12.3% | 13.4% | 0.94 | −35.0% | +149% | 0.67 | 0.40% |
| 77 | IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF · International | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.9% | 0.55 | −31.0% | +126% | 0.69 | 0.09% |
| 78 | RODMHartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF · International | Whole market | +10.6% | 13.5% | 0.82 | −36.0% | +141% | 0.71 | 0.29% |
| 79 | QUSState Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.1% | 14.2% | 0.81 | −33.8% | +273% | 0.85 | 0.15% |
| 80 | RAAXVanEck Real Assets ETF · Commodities | Whole market | +11.7% | 15.6% | 0.79 | −33.9% | — | 0.55 | 0.55% |
| 81 | VFMOVanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.4% | 22.1% | 0.60 | −36.8% | — | 0.64 | 0.13% |
| 82 | INFLHorizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.8% | 17.8% | 0.72 | −21.3% | — | 0.61 | 0.85% |
| 83 | QGROAmerican Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.9% | 21.2% | 0.55 | −32.6% | — | 0.81 | 0.29% |
| 84 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.63 | — | |
| 85 | TDVGT. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.6% | 13.8% | 0.73 | −19.2% | — | 0.83 | 0.50% |
| 86 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.06 | — | |
| 87 | DUSADavis Select U.S. Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.4% | 0.68 | −36.7% | — | 0.77 | 0.59% |
| 88 | FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −19.4% | +121% | 0.71 | 0.75% |
| 89 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.73 | 0.50% |
| 90 | AVESAvantis Emerging Markets Value ETF · International | Whole market | +8.0% | 17.4% | 0.53 | −27.4% | — | 0.54 | 0.36% |
| 91 | GEMGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +7.3% | 18.8% | 0.47 | −37.0% | +113% | 0.50 | 0.59% |
| 92 | NTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +8.2% | 17.2% | 0.55 | −31.4% | — | 0.85 | 0.20% |
| 93 | IDHQInvesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF · International | Whole market | +10.0% | 17.9% | 0.63 | −33.6% | +183% | 0.74 | 0.29% |
| 94 | QQQEDirexion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +8.1% | 20.7% | 0.48 | −32.1% | +294% | 0.79 | 0.35% |
| 95 | FDRRFidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.6% | 15.0% | 0.87 | −36.5% | +265% | 0.80 | 0.15% |
| 96 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · International | Whole market | +13.8% | 15.1% | 0.94 | −34.4% | +261% | 0.74 | 0.50% |
| 97 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Popular alternative | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.28 | — |
| 98 | SIXAETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.8% | 12.7% | 1.01 | −18.4% | — | 0.73 | 0.31% |
| 99 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.33 | 0.48% |
| 100 | QDEFNorthern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.7% | 0.94 | −35.7% | +228% | 0.81 | 0.40% |
MCO against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against MCO, compared period by period and year by year.
How do MCO's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at MCO, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- CBOE, CME and NDAQ were both more rewarding and calmer than MCO over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, MCO returned 5.9% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (26.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than MCO with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | +21.5% | 25.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | +11.2% | 20.8% |
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | +8.9% | 24.7% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | +7.1% | 27.1% |
| MCO This pageMoody's Corporation | +5.9% | 26.9% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | +5.4% | 21.8% |
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | +3.1% | 7.5% |
| KRE State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | +2.2% | 29.4% |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | +0.7% | 25.6% |
| TRI Thomson Reuters Corporation | +0.7% | 29.3% |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | +0.4% | 39.8% |
| MSCI MSCI Inc. | +0.1% | 31.3% |
| LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | −0.9% | 8.7% |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | −1.4% | 25.9% |
| FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | −4.8% | 30.4% |
| MORN Morningstar, Inc. | −5.1% | 32.4% |
| TRU TransUnion | −7.0% | 40.1% |
| EFX Equifax Inc. | −7.4% | 35.2% |
Has MCO consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares MCO with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than MCO helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Three of the 17 popular alternatives, CBOE, NDAQ and BLK, outperformed MCO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- CBOE and NDAQ outperformed MCO in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- CME, NDAQ and HYG earned more for the risk they took than MCO (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than MCO over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| MCO Moody's Corporation (this page) | — | +1.7% | −5.7% | +3.8% | −4.1% | +1.1% | +57.3% | +33.4% | +383% | 26.9% | 0.35 | −42.0% | — | $82B | — |
| CBOE QualifiedCboe Global Markets, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +16.1% | +13.5% | +4.0% | +27.9% | +34.2% | +101% | +165% | +463% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | — | $33B | — |
| NDAQ QualifiedNasdaq, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +0.1% | +3.5% | +8.8% | −0.9% | +8.1% | +95.1% | +52.9% | +407% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | — | $53B | — |
| BLK QualifiedBlackRock, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +3.5% | +7.6% | +8.8% | +5.7% | −0.6% | +96.3% | +41.1% | +313% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | — | $175B | — |
| MSCI Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesMSCI Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +5.9% | −5.0% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +11.8% | +25.5% | +0.5% | +702% | 31.3% | 0.16 | −43.7% | — | $43B | — |
| CME Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCME Group Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +7.2% | +21.0% | +3.8% | +13.2% | +14.6% | +57.7% | +70.1% | +319% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | — | $106B | — |
| KRE FinancialsState Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 2/5 short1/3 long | −1.9% | −6.4% | +1.1% | +10.1% | +19.4% | +95.8% | +11.7% | +111% | 29.4% | 0.22 | −55.0% | 0.35% | $3.4B | — |
| BX Asset ManagementBlackstone Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −12.7% | −9.8% | −12.8% | −28.3% | −28.4% | +28.6% | +2.1% | +628% | 39.8% | 0.21 | −49.3% | — | $127B | — |
| FDS Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesFactSet Research Systems Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +9.9% | +22.5% | +33.5% | +11.1% | +9.5% | −24.7% | −21.8% | +127% | 30.4% | -0.01 | −61.1% | — | $11B | — |
| MORN Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesMorningstar, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +5.4% | +23.6% | +14.2% | +1.5% | −1.9% | −3.7% | −22.9% | +203% | 32.4% | 0.00 | −60.0% | — | $7.9B | — |
| TRI Specialty Business ServicesThomson Reuters Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +18.2% | +19.0% | +22.4% | −8.8% | −28.1% | −2.5% | +3.6% | +244% | 29.3% | 0.17 | −63.5% | — | $49B | — |
| ICE Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesIntercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +2.1% | +12.4% | −0.6% | +0.1% | +3.5% | +52.4% | +30.0% | +240% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | — | $89B | — |
| VRSK Software - ServicesVerisk Analytics, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +11.0% | −5.2% | +6.8% | −13.0% | −18.1% | −16.8% | −6.7% | +151% | 25.9% | 0.08 | −50.8% | — | $25B | — |
| SPGI Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesS&P Global Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +8.3% | −2.1% | −0.6% | −13.9% | −7.4% | +28.2% | +3.7% | +293% | 25.6% | 0.16 | −39.8% | — | $129B | — |
| TRU Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesTransUnion | 2/5 short0/3 long | +9.6% | −0.8% | +0.9% | −5.7% | −1.7% | +22.2% | −30.6% | +149% | 40.1% | 0.02 | −64.9% | — | $15B | — |
| EFX Consulting ServicesEquifax Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +11.3% | −1.7% | −10.5% | −16.8% | −22.7% | +2.6% | −31.9% | +49.9% | 35.2% | -0.04 | −54.4% | — | $21B | — |
| HYG BondsiShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | −1.9% | −2.1% | −1.8% | −0.4% | +0.7% | +27.5% | +16.8% | +49.5% | 7.5% | 0.45 | −22.0% | 0.49% | $17B | — |
| LQD BondsiShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | −1.4% | −2.4% | −3.9% | −2.9% | −3.9% | +19.7% | −4.3% | +20.5% | 8.7% | -0.06 | −25.0% | 0.14% | $29B | — |
How did MCO do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where MCO ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with MCO and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, MCO finished in the top quarter in ten of 26 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 6 of 18.
- MCO finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 18 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, MSCI came out ahead of MCO most often, in ten of the 18 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of MCO; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places MCO among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of MCO | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO This pageMoody's Corporation | — | +8.7% | +22.2% | +41.5% | −28.0% | +35.6% | +23.3% | +71.3% | −4.1% | +58.5% | −4.5% | +6.1% | +23.7% | +58.3% | +51.8% | +28.9% | +0.8% | +35.5% | −43.0% | −48.0% | +13.0% | +41.9% | +44.1% | +47.2% | +4.0% | +56.0% | +19.9% | −0.5% | +11.2% | +42.4% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 10 of 26 | 6 of 18 | 5 of 18 | 3 of 18 | 13 of 18 | 11 of 18 | 9 of 18 | 3 of 18 | 14 of 18 | 5 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 9 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 1 of 17 | 1 of 17 | 14 of 16 | 9 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 12 of 12 | 8 of 11 | 4 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 2 of 9 | 1 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 3 of 5 | — | — | — |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 7 of 15 | +30.0% | +10.7% | +44.4% | −2.1% | +42.2% | −21.2% | +24.1% | −20.6% | +70.5% | +15.5% | +3.8% | +23.8% | +80.7% | +19.1% | +15.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 12 of 23 | +27.2% | +34.9% | −3.7% | −11.2% | +60.1% | +26.0% | +33.9% | +8.2% | +16.8% | +17.4% | +23.3% | +22.4% | +61.9% | +3.7% | +3.2% | +19.7% | −19.8% | −50.1% | +60.8% | −12.5% | +245% | +8.0% | −5.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 10 of 26 | +6.6% | +29.3% | +17.9% | −20.4% | +29.4% | +47.2% | +31.9% | −21.6% | +38.2% | +14.6% | −2.4% | +15.7% | +57.0% | +19.8% | −3.6% | −15.9% | +76.6% | −37.0% | +45.1% | +41.8% | +42.4% | +47.6% | +35.9% | −5.5% | −0.7% | +144% | — | — | — |
| MSCI MSCI Inc. | 10 of 18 | −3.2% | +7.3% | +22.9% | −23.3% | +38.1% | +74.4% | +77.2% | +18.0% | +62.6% | +10.6% | +54.0% | +9.0% | +41.0% | −5.9% | −15.5% | +22.5% | +79.1% | −53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 11 of 23 | +19.8% | +15.4% | +31.3% | −22.9% | +29.5% | −6.3% | +9.7% | +32.1% | +32.4% | +33.9% | +4.4% | +18.3% | +64.0% | +11.4% | −22.7% | −2.7% | +64.3% | −68.8% | +35.3% | +39.5% | +61.8% | +219% | +67.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KRE State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 7 of 19 | +10.2% | +18.6% | −7.6% | −15.1% | +39.3% | −7.4% | +27.4% | −19.0% | +7.5% | +35.0% | +4.9% | +1.8% | +47.5% | +16.9% | −5.9% | +20.7% | −22.0% | −18.6% | −22.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 9 of 18 | −7.8% | +35.1% | +82.8% | −40.0% | +107% | +19.8% | +96.3% | +0.1% | +27.4% | −1.5% | −5.0% | +13.9% | +114% | +15.7% | +3.4% | +12.7% | +117% | −67.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | 16 of 29 | −38.9% | +1.6% | +20.0% | −16.8% | +47.5% | +25.1% | +35.5% | +5.0% | +19.4% | +1.8% | +16.7% | +31.3% | +24.9% | +2.2% | −5.9% | +44.1% | +51.1% | −19.5% | −0.7% | +37.9% | +6.3% | +54.2% | +36.0% | −18.6% | −5.3% | −6.7% | +94.2% | +101% | +46.5% |
| MORN Morningstar, Inc. | 7 of 20 | −35.0% | +18.3% | +33.1% | −36.3% | +48.2% | +54.5% | +38.9% | +14.3% | +33.4% | −7.5% | +25.6% | −16.4% | +24.9% | +6.6% | +12.3% | +9.9% | +36.2% | −54.4% | +72.6% | +30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TRI Thomson Reuters Corporation | 8 of 23 | −16.6% | +11.1% | +29.8% | −3.1% | +48.3% | +16.6% | +51.4% | +13.3% | +2.2% | +19.1% | −3.4% | +10.1% | +34.5% | +13.3% | −26.2% | +18.7% | +14.5% | −26.3% | +0.4% | +22.1% | −0.1% | −0.6% | +40.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 10 of 20 | +9.9% | +17.5% | +27.1% | −23.9% | +19.9% | +26.2% | +24.5% | +8.1% | +26.6% | +11.5% | +18.3% | −1.3% | +82.2% | +2.7% | +1.2% | +6.1% | +36.2% | −57.2% | +78.4% | +197% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 6 of 16 | −18.2% | +16.0% | +36.2% | −22.3% | +10.8% | +39.9% | +37.9% | +13.6% | +18.3% | +5.6% | +20.0% | −2.5% | +28.9% | +27.0% | +17.8% | +12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 11 of 29 | +5.7% | +13.9% | +32.8% | −28.4% | +44.7% | +21.4% | +62.3% | +1.4% | +59.3% | +10.5% | +12.3% | +15.5% | +45.9% | +30.1% | +26.6% | +12.0% | +49.3% | −45.5% | −34.7% | +33.5% | +14.2% | +33.0% | +17.8% | +0.8% | +5.7% | −3.2% | +22.8% | +41.1% | +64.4% |
| TRU TransUnion | 4 of 10 | −7.0% | +35.6% | +21.8% | −51.9% | +19.9% | +16.3% | +51.3% | +3.7% | +77.7% | +12.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EFX Equifax Inc. | 8 of 29 | −14.2% | +3.7% | +28.2% | −33.1% | +52.8% | +39.0% | +52.3% | −20.0% | +0.9% | +7.3% | +39.3% | +18.6% | +29.5% | +41.9% | +10.9% | +16.2% | +17.2% | −26.6% | −10.0% | +7.2% | +35.8% | +15.2% | +6.2% | −3.9% | −15.2% | +23.5% | −30.3% | −2.7% | +17.0% |
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5 of 18 | +8.6% | +8.0% | +11.6% | −11.0% | +3.8% | +4.5% | +14.1% | −2.0% | +6.1% | +13.4% | −5.0% | +1.9% | +5.7% | +11.7% | +6.7% | +11.9% | +28.5% | −17.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5 of 23 | +7.9% | +0.9% | +9.4% | −17.9% | −1.8% | +11.0% | +17.4% | −3.8% | +7.0% | +6.2% | −1.3% | +8.2% | −2.0% | +10.6% | +9.8% | +9.3% | +8.4% | +2.4% | +3.7% | +4.2% | +1.1% | +5.7% | +7.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How MCO has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were MCO's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents MCO's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1994, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of MCO's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: MCO fell 37.1% from April to August 1999, while the S&P 500 rose 1.9%.
- The slowest recovery came after MCO fell 78.7% from February 2007 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until May 2013, four years later.
Green means MCO fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | MCO fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −78.7% | −46.2% | Feb 2007 | Nov 2008 | 21 months | May 2013 | 4.5 years |
| Covid crash | −42.0% | −33.7% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jul 2020 | 4 months |
| 2022 bear market | −41.7% | −20.8% | Oct 2021 | Oct 2022 | 12 months | Feb 2024 | 16 months |
| No named crash | −37.1% | +1.9% | Apr 1999 | Aug 1999 | 4 months | Oct 2000 | 14 months |
| No named crash | −35.1% | −13.7% | Jun 1998 | Sep 1998 | 3 months | Feb 1999 | 5 months |
How did MCO do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far MCO, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, HYG held up best, falling less than MCO in all nine crashes they both traded through.
- MCO fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when MCO fell 29.3% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than MCO.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO This pageMoody's Corporation | — | −3.4% | −37.6% | −42.0% | −26.1% | −4.6% | −29.3% | −27.6% | −0.7% | −69.3% | −18.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 5 of 7 | −3.7% | −16.4% | −38.6% | −18.9% | −20.4% | −17.0% | −11.8% | — | — | — |
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −5.7% | −27.8% | −37.1% | −16.7% | −6.4% | −10.1% | −16.1% | −5.3% | −68.5% | — |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −7.2% | −40.8% | −42.3% | −25.2% | −7.1% | −19.9% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −33.0% |
| MSCI MSCI Inc. | 6 of 8 | −2.5% | −35.8% | −32.2% | −24.6% | −6.1% | −13.3% | −26.3% | −1.7% | — | — |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −31.7% | −37.4% | −9.4% | −4.3% | −17.3% | −18.0% | −1.9% | −77.5% | — |
| KRE State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 3 of 9 | −23.0% | −27.5% | −49.6% | −28.5% | −5.9% | −28.0% | −27.2% | −1.9% | −66.0% | — |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 0 of 9 | −12.3% | −38.5% | −42.6% | −29.1% | −4.2% | −37.7% | −35.6% | −3.5% | −84.9% | — |
| FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | 6 of 10 | −3.0% | −25.9% | −33.6% | −19.7% | −5.7% | −22.3% | −18.4% | −2.2% | −54.4% | −59.0% |
| MORN Morningstar, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −10.0% | −37.3% | −35.4% | −19.4% | −4.9% | −11.2% | −16.7% | −0.7% | −67.9% | — |
| TRI Thomson Reuters Corporation | 7 of 9 | −2.4% | −19.9% | −35.4% | −9.3% | −7.0% | −17.4% | −25.1% | −2.0% | −56.6% | — |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −7.0% | −33.8% | −33.0% | −13.3% | −9.4% | −12.7% | −19.3% | −2.0% | −73.9% | — |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 6 of 8 | −2.6% | −28.4% | −28.5% | −17.4% | −6.6% | −19.1% | −8.0% | −1.0% | — | — |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 6 of 10 | −4.2% | −36.3% | −38.1% | −24.6% | −6.2% | −21.3% | −20.8% | −0.4% | −66.4% | −29.5% |
| TRU TransUnion | 1 of 6 | −6.4% | −52.7% | −45.1% | −29.8% | −4.8% | −25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| EFX Equifax Inc. | 4 of 10 | −3.4% | −42.3% | −35.8% | −32.3% | −7.6% | −17.9% | −16.9% | −0.5% | −49.8% | −48.6% |
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 9 of 9 | −1.1% | −15.3% | −22.0% | −6.4% | −1.5% | −10.5% | −9.8% | 0.0% | −34.2% | — |
| LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 9 of 9 | −0.1% | −21.3% | −21.8% | −2.6% | −1.2% | −2.7% | −3.2% | 0.0% | −21.5% | — |
How closely does MCO move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares MCO with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- MSCI took just 121% of the S&P 500's losses, against 151% for MCO, while still keeping 131% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, MCO captured 131% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 151% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.26. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Seven of the 17 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than MCO's 0.87, led by CME, CBOE and MSCI.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than MCO's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO This pageMoody's Corporation | 131% | 151% | 0.87 | 1.26 |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 50% | 11% | 4.48 | 0.33 |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 79% | 50% | 1.59 | 0.53 |
| MSCI MSCI Inc. | 131% | 121% | 1.08 | 1.12 |
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 104% | 97% | 1.07 | 0.91 |
| TRI Thomson Reuters Corporation | 69% | 67% | 1.04 | 0.63 |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 88% | 94% | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 156% | 170% | 0.92 | 1.48 |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 63% | 73% | 0.87 | 0.73 |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 107% | 125% | 0.85 | 1.04 |
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 34% | 40% | 0.84 | 0.39 |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 127% | 157% | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| MORN Morningstar, Inc. | 93% | 117% | 0.79 | 1.07 |
| KRE State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 86% | 117% | 0.73 | 1.12 |
| FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | 71% | 97% | 0.73 | 0.76 |
| LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 25% | 39% | 0.64 | 0.33 |
| TRU TransUnion | 142% | 228% | 0.62 | 1.47 |
| EFX Equifax Inc. | 103% | 191% | 0.54 | 1.39 |
What diversifies MCO?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with MCO's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing MCO with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in MCO into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 23% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+5.9% for MCO alone, +7.6% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, GLD and XLE have moved largely independently of MCO over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.33 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- XLE made money in four of the six calendar years in which MCO lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which MCO lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% MCO and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2016 | 2008 | 2007 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO Moody's Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +33.4% | 0.35 | −28.0% | −4.1% | −4.5% | −43.0% | −48.0% | −0.5% | 25.6% | +5.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.33 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +1.1% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | 21.5% | +10.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.19 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | +8.0% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | 21.4% | +9.0% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.26 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | +28.0% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +18.1% | 22.4% | +10.0% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.46 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | −9.9% | +17.7% | −45.3% | +6.4% | — | 23.3% | +9.5% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.45 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | +14.9% | — | — | — | 22.4% | +8.8% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.39 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +21.6% | — | — | — | — | — | 19.7% | +7.6% |
| SOXX Broad MarketiShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.47 | +237% | 0.82 | −35.1% | −6.5% | +38.3% | −51.7% | −2.2% | — | 25.0% | +11.7% |
| DBA AlternativesInvesco DB Agriculture Fund | 0.18 | +66.4% | 0.81 | +2.5% | −8.7% | −3.1% | −19.1% | — | — | 21.0% | +7.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2016 | 2008 | 2007 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO Moody's Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +33.4% | 0.35 | −28.0% | −4.1% | −4.5% | −43.0% | −48.0% | −0.5% | 25.6% | +5.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.32 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | −17.5% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −36.8% | 22.7% | +12.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.28 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | +7.4% | −20.5% | −25.7% | +350% | 26.3% | +24.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.30 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +18.3% | −15.2% | +2.1% | −58.7% | 24.7% | +20.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.20 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −28.3% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −71.3% | 22.1% | +12.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.19 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +0.7% | — | — | — | 22.7% | +14.6% |
Common questions
What was MCO's worst drawdown?
MCO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1994 was 78.7%, from February 2007 to November 2008. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were MCO's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, MCO's best year was 2019, when it returned 71.3%. Its worst was 2007, with a return of -48.0%.
Is there a better investment than MCO?
Among MCO's popular alternatives, CBOE, NDAQ and CME earned more than MCO with less volatility over the past 5 years. CBOE returned 21.5% a year at 25.1% volatility, against 5.9% a year at 26.9%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CTAS (business services) and SEIC (asset management) earned more than MCO with less volatility over the past 5 years. CTAS returned 16.5% a year at 23.1% volatility, against 5.9% a year at 26.9%.
Is MCO more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. MCO's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.9%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MCO's return lands within 26.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is MCO's Sharpe ratio?
MCO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.35, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MCO earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is MCO with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, MCO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.82 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MCO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MCO holding.
What are the best alternatives to MCO?
Of the 17 popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed MCO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CBOE, NDAQ and BLK.
Did MCO outperform the S&P 500?
MCO finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 18 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +8.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did MCO do in stock market crashes?
MCO fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when MCO fell 29.3% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies MCO?
These had a low correlation with MCO over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.33), GLD (correlation 0.19) and XLE (correlation 0.26); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.32), CLS (correlation 0.28) and FIX (correlation 0.30). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than MCO's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of MCO's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to MCO
NDAQNasdaq
BLKBlackRock
MSCIMSCI
CMECME Group
BXBlackstone
TRIThomson Reuters
ICEIntercontinental Exchange
SPGIS&P Global