Relative Intelligence · Software

How Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CDNS alone. It places CDNS (Cadence Design Systems, Inc.) against 10 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CDNS stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CDNS's full trading record, from June 1987 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowThe slide is CDNS's own: it is 23.2% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. CDNS has trailed the market, rising 0.4% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is CDNS's own: it fell 3.0% over the past 3 months while the software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. On the flip side, last month cut against the tape: CDNS rose 8.5% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, CDNS fell 3.0% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (34.0% against 89.3%). The long record (ahead of 96% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 10 years) has not carried into the past 3 years (behind 59% of them). By year ↓
- Long termCDNS turned $10,000 into $124,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. CDNS's 10-year return of 1,139% puts it ahead of 96% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, CDNS has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500. That said, in the 2022 bear market, CDNS held up better than SNPS (Synopsys), ADSK and BSY; only PTC fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, CDNS has a correlation of 0.59 over 5 years, more closely than 88% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) earned more than CDNS over the past 5 years with similar volatility: TSM returned 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 37.2%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- ADI (Analog Devices, semiconductors) and FFIV (F5, cybersecurity) earned more than CDNS with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 37.2%.
- Whole market
- 285 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CDNS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company).
How much would $10,000 in CDNS have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CDNS over the past 28 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CDNS over the same span and CDNS's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 28 years rather than CDNS's full 29 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in CDNS at the end of September 1998 would have grown to $129,178 by September 2026, more than the $121,630 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the six other investments on the chart ended ahead of CDNS, and ASML finished highest, at $3,096,887.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1998 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 511 of the 1,106 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CDNS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 1 line is a popular alternative, shown for context.
- ASML$3M+30,869% total · +22.7% a year
- TSM$2M+23,057% total · +21.5% a year
- ADI$814,605+8,046% total · +17.0% a year
- ADSK$333,339+3,233% total · +13.3% a year
- SNPS$261,063+2,511% total · +12.4% a year
- CDNS$129,178+1,192% total · +9.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$121,630+1,116% total · +9.3% a year
- PTC$55,756+458% total · +6.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 668 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CDNS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- SMH$48,982+390% total · +37.4% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- ADI$25,751+158% total · +20.8% a year
- FFIV$22,395+124% total · +17.5% a year
- KEYS$22,159+122% total · +17.2% a year
- CDNS$21,803+118% total · +16.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- PTC$11,712+17.1% total · +3.2% a year
- DSGX$9,951−0.5% total · −0.1% a year
CDNS at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- CDNS is still 23.2% below its all-time high.
- CDNS's deepest decline since it began trading in 1987 was 93.1%, from April 1998 to December 2008. It took about nine years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, CDNS's best was 2020, when it returned 96.7%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 78.5%. It lost money in seven of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $88B
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Price history from
- June 1987
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −3.0%total return
- Past 3 years
- +34.0%+10.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +99.8%+14.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,139%+28.6% a year
- Best calendar year
- +96.7%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −78.5%2008
- Losing years
- 7 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 37.2%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.56return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −93.1%Apr 1998 to Dec 2008
- From its all-time high
- −23.2%below the peak
CDNS against the whole market
Where CDNS ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CDNS rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CDNS on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CDNS stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- CDNS's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 3% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CDNS | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −3.0% | 2,109 of 3,287 | bottom 37% |
| 3-year return | +34.0% | 1,785 of 3,017 | bottom 42% |
| 5-year return | +99.8% | 684 of 2,893 | top 24% |
| 10-year return | +1,139% | 86 of 2,202 | top 4% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 37.2% | 1,282 of 2,893 | top 44% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.56 | 785 of 2,893 | top 27% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −34.2% | 59 of 2,187 | top 3% |
What has beaten CDNS on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CDNS sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CDNS with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 223 stocks and 62 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CDNS over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 8% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half CDNS's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 34% less than CDNS's 37.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.56 for CDNS. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than CDNS (33.4% against 37.2%).
- None of CDNS's popular alternatives made it, but ADI (semiconductors) did: 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, 8% less than CDNS's 37.2%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CDNS; faint dots are 93 more of the 285 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than CDNS?
Investments that beat CDNS over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among CDNS's popular alternatives, TSM and SMH earned more than CDNS over the past 5 years with similar volatility: TSM returned 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 37.2%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ADI (semiconductors) and FFIV (cybersecurity) earned more than CDNS with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 37.2%.
- Across the whole market, 285 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CDNS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and LLY.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CDNS over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CDNS's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than CDNS follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CDNS's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CDNS's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CDNS's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with CDNS?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +1,139% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.59 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against CDNS. 3 of 9 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.52 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.64 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Software and the categories next to it (Application Software, Enterprise Software, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus CDNS's specific themes. 15 of 124 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.33 | — | ||
FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.46 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.34 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +17.4% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | +1,628% | 0.43 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.42 | — | ||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Similar return, lower volatility | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.47 | 0.58% | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 559 of 3,500 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | -0.12 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.20 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | -0.07 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.34 | 0.48% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | -0.09 | — | ||
FFLCFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Broad Market | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.7% | 16.8% | 0.95 | −19.7% | — | 0.47 | 0.38% | |
What these numbers mean for CDNS
- Annual return
- CDNS returned 14.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $20,000. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CDNS's volatility over the past 5 years was 37.2%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CDNS's return lands within 37.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CDNS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.56, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CDNS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CDNS's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 34.2%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 34.2% fall takes a 52.0% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CDNS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.59 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CDNS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CDNS holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 285 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than CDNS with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with CDNS | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.22 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.01 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | -0.12 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.20 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | -0.07 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.05 | — | |
| 7 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | -0.02 | — |
| 8 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.37 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.08 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.20 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | -0.28 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.20 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.09 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.00 | — | |
| 15 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.34 | 0.48% |
| 16 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.06 | 0.40% |
| 17 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | -0.17 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.37 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | -0.01 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | -0.24 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.35 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | -0.32 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.01 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.04 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.53 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.20 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | -0.20 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | -0.05 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.00 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | -0.24 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.04 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | -0.33 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | -0.17 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.69 | 0.09% | |
| 35 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.34 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.02 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.24 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.23 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | -0.10 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.04 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.06 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | -0.02 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | -0.21 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.08 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +26.5% | 32.5% | 0.89 | −77.5% | +433% | -0.12 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.25 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.30 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | -0.10 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.13 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.43 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.35 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | -0.19 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.07 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +339% | 0.09 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | -0.15 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.7% | 0.66 | −63.9% | +141% | -0.31 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.05 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.18 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.41 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +19.2% | 34.4% | 0.69 | −66.8% | +416% | -0.16 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.35 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.20 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.01 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.35 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | -0.01 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.21 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.20 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +18.1% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | +312% | 0.30 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | -0.08 | — | |
| 70 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.06 | — |
| 71 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.12 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | -0.09 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | -0.19 | 0.08% | |
| 74 | Whole market | +19.7% | 34.6% | 0.70 | −73.5% | +248% | -0.04 | — | |
| 75 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.09 | — |
| 76 | Whole market | +25.3% | 34.4% | 0.83 | −64.1% | +390% | 0.13 | — | |
| 77 | NWGNatWest Group plc · Banks | Whole market | +27.7% | 34.1% | 0.89 | −67.4% | +495% | 0.08 | — |
| 78 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.13 | — |
| 79 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.28 | — | |
| 80 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | -0.16 | 0.80% |
| 81 | Whole market | +17.3% | 27.8% | 0.71 | −57.7% | +809% | 0.26 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.02 | 0.40% | |
| 83 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.39 | — | |
| 84 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | -0.17 | — |
| 85 | TSTenaris S.A. · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +24.3% | 33.3% | 0.82 | −75.1% | +181% | -0.02 | — |
| 86 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.05 | — |
| 87 | SHGShinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +21.0% | 31.1% | 0.77 | −64.1% | +175% | 0.13 | — |
| 88 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | -0.05 | — |
| 89 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.38 | — |
| 90 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | -0.01 | — |
| 91 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.52 | 0.13% |
| 92 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.25 | — |
| 93 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | -0.20 | — |
| 94 | USFDUS Foods Holding Corp. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +22.7% | 29.8% | 0.84 | −77.3% | +347% | 0.18 | — |
| 95 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.34 | 0.56% |
| 96 | UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corporation · Biotechnology | Whole market | +23.6% | 35.1% | 0.78 | −55.6% | +390% | 0.01 | — |
| 97 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | -0.17 | — |
| 98 | NMRNomura Holdings, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +17.1% | 29.9% | 0.68 | −54.0% | +179% | 0.12 | — |
| 99 | WESWestern Midstream Partners, LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +23.5% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | +128% | 0.10 | — |
| 100 | WFWoori Financial Group Inc. · Banks | Whole market | +26.3% | 31.6% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +282% | 0.14 | — |
CDNS against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CDNS, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CDNS's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CDNS, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only SMH was both more rewarding and calmer than CDNS over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, CDNS returned 14.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (37.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CDNS with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | +33.4% | 36.9% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| CDNS This pageCadence Design Systems, Inc. | +14.8% | 37.2% |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | +13.9% | 34.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| PTC PTC Inc. | +8.3% | 35.0% |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | +7.2% | 42.3% |
| DSGX The Descartes Systems Group Inc. | +1.8% | 31.8% |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | −3.8% | 36.4% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | −7.5% | 37.1% |
Has CDNS consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CDNS with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CDNS helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Three of the ten popular alternatives, NVDA, SMH and TSM, outperformed CDNS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- NVDA, SMH and TSM outperformed CDNS in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CDNS over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (this page) | — | +8.5% | −3.0% | +0.4% | +3.1% | −3.0% | +34.0% | +99.8% | +1,139% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | — | $88B | — |
| NVDA QualifiedNVIDIA Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| SMH QualifiedVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −8.3% | −2.2% | +17.8% | +46.4% | +57.8% | +290% | +323% | +1,665% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | 0.35% | $66B | — |
| TSM QualifiedTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| PTC Software - ApplicationPTC Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +42.9% | +54.9% | +37.4% | +13.7% | −6.1% | +40.4% | +49.3% | +317% | 35.0% | 0.40 | −54.4% | — | $21B | — |
| KEYS Hardware, Equipment & PartsKeysight Technologies, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −2.3% | +6.4% | −0.3% | +61.8% | +103% | +172% | +91.9% | +923% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | — | $57B | — |
| ARM SemiconductorsArm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | 3/5 short1/3 long | −31.5% | −18.0% | +26.2% | +92.7% | +28.9% | +362% | — | — | — | — | −54.0% | — | $236B | — |
| DSGX Software - ApplicationThe Descartes Systems Group Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +13.7% | +22.5% | +17.3% | +6.0% | −5.9% | +24.5% | +9.2% | +324% | 31.8% | 0.21 | −48.7% | — | $7.7B | — |
| SNPS Software - InfrastructureSynopsys, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +11.4% | +18.3% | −2.9% | −6.8% | −1.3% | −4.3% | +41.9% | +656% | 42.3% | 0.39 | −43.0% | — | $86B | — |
| BSY Software - ApplicationBentley Systems, Incorporated | 3/5 short0/3 long | +19.6% | +18.1% | +8.8% | +0.6% | −25.6% | −22.4% | −32.4% | — | 37.1% | -0.03 | −61.0% | — | $11B | — |
| ADSK Software - ApplicationAutodesk, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +12.2% | +12.8% | +0.1% | −14.4% | −20.3% | +21.2% | −17.8% | +245% | 36.4% | 0.07 | −52.0% | — | $51B | — |
How did CDNS do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where CDNS ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CDNS and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CDNS finished in the top quarter in 11 of 28 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 5 of 11.
- CDNS finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, NVDA came out ahead of CDNS most often, in 18 of the 26 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CDNS; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CDNS among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CDNS | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS This pageCadence Design Systems, Inc. | — | +4.0% | +10.3% | +69.5% | −13.8% | +36.6% | +96.7% | +59.5% | +4.0% | +65.8% | +21.2% | +9.7% | +35.3% | +3.8% | +29.9% | +25.9% | +37.9% | +63.7% | −78.5% | −5.0% | +5.9% | +22.5% | −23.2% | +52.5% | −46.2% | −20.3% | +14.6% | −19.3% | +21.4% | +24.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 11 of 28 | 5 of 11 | 7 of 11 | 3 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 2 of 9 | 7 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 2 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 1 of 8 | 8 of 8 | 2 of 8 | 1 of 8 | 2 of 8 | 3 of 8 | 8 of 8 | 8 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 4 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 3 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 2 of 7 | 4 of 5 | 2 of 5 | — |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 18 of 26 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% | +1.6% | +102% | −82.8% | +308% | +39.6% | — | — | — |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 12 of 25 | +49.2% | +39.1% | +73.4% | −33.5% | +42.1% | +55.5% | +64.5% | −9.1% | +38.5% | +35.6% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +33.4% | +8.6% | +6.8% | +19.0% | +60.5% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −6.7% | +10.8% | −19.3% | +87.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | — | — | — |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 14 of 28 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +52.9% | −16.1% | −4.3% | +18.9% | +27.1% | −4.2% | +56.7% | −54.8% | +39.5% | −51.0% | +290% | +13.4% | — |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 10 of 29 | −5.3% | +5.1% | +45.8% | −0.9% | +1.3% | +59.7% | −9.7% | +36.4% | +31.3% | +33.6% | −5.5% | +3.6% | +57.2% | +23.3% | −18.9% | +37.9% | +29.2% | −29.1% | −0.9% | +18.2% | +3.6% | +49.4% | +56.4% | −67.7% | −41.9% | −50.3% | +66.6% | −31.4% | −7.8% |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | 5 of 11 | +26.5% | +1.0% | −7.0% | −17.2% | +56.3% | +28.7% | +65.3% | +49.2% | +13.8% | +29.1% | −16.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ARM Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | 1 of 2 | −11.4% | +64.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DSGX The Descartes Systems Group Inc. | 10 of 26 | −22.8% | +35.1% | +20.7% | −15.8% | +41.4% | +36.9% | +61.5% | −6.8% | +32.7% | +6.6% | +35.5% | +10.7% | +44.0% | +29.9% | +1.7% | +18.7% | +98.3% | −28.8% | +13.8% | +17.5% | +57.0% | −29.1% | −9.0% | −58.4% | −69.0% | +11.6% | — | — | — |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | 11 of 29 | −3.2% | −5.7% | +61.3% | −13.4% | +42.1% | +86.2% | +65.2% | −1.2% | +44.8% | +29.0% | +4.9% | +7.1% | +27.4% | +17.1% | +1.1% | +20.8% | +20.3% | −28.6% | −3.0% | +33.3% | +2.6% | −42.3% | +46.7% | −21.9% | +24.5% | −28.9% | +23.0% | +51.7% | −22.7% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | 0 of 5 | −17.8% | −10.1% | +41.8% | −23.3% | +19.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 11 of 29 | +0.1% | +21.4% | +30.3% | −33.5% | −7.9% | +66.4% | +42.6% | +22.7% | +41.6% | +21.5% | +1.5% | +19.4% | +42.4% | +16.6% | −20.6% | +50.3% | +29.3% | −60.5% | +23.0% | −5.8% | +13.2% | +210% | +73.0% | −22.5% | +39.5% | −19.5% | −20.3% | +16.3% | +33.0% |
Risk and diversification
How CDNS has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CDNS's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CDNS's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1987, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- The slowest recovery came after CDNS fell 93.1% from April 1998 to December 2008; it did not regain that peak until August 2017, nine years later.
Green means CDNS fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CDNS fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −93.1% | −8.3% | Apr 1998 | Dec 2008 | 10.7 years | Aug 2017 | 8.7 years |
| No named crash | −75.4% | — | Mar 1991 | Apr 1993 | 2.1 years | Jun 1995 | 2.2 years |
| No named crash | −66.4% | — | Oct 1987 | Dec 1987 | 2 months | Jan 1989 | 13 months |
| No named crash | −51.0% | — | May 1990 | Oct 1990 | 5 months | Feb 1991 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −47.4% | −6.3% | Jun 1996 | Jul 1996 | 1 month | Jan 1997 | 6 months |
How did CDNS do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CDNS, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, TSM held up best, falling less than CDNS in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- CDNS fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when CDNS fell 88.2% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CDNS.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS This pageCadence Design Systems, Inc. | — | −1.8% | −24.3% | −32.1% | −14.1% | −10.4% | −19.3% | −21.4% | −4.6% | −88.2% | −72.3% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 3 of 10 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 5 of 9 | −3.6% | −44.1% | −33.6% | −23.5% | −7.4% | −17.9% | −18.6% | −1.5% | −59.2% | — |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 6 of 10 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 4 of 10 | −4.3% | −20.4% | −45.3% | −27.8% | −4.9% | −24.9% | −33.9% | −3.0% | −66.1% | −94.5% |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −2.6% | −33.8% | −17.7% | −18.0% | −6.7% | −37.2% | — | — | — | — |
| DSGX The Descartes Systems Group Inc. | 4 of 10 | −2.4% | −27.9% | −37.0% | −28.0% | −8.4% | −24.7% | −19.9% | 0.0% | −55.6% | −97.7% |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −3.7% | −29.3% | −34.3% | −20.3% | −8.4% | −22.8% | −13.7% | −1.9% | −49.1% | −48.0% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | 0 of 2 | −4.3% | −39.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −5.1% | −40.9% | −35.5% | −24.2% | −6.9% | −34.7% | −36.9% | −1.6% | −76.9% | −63.6% |
How closely does CDNS move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CDNS with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, CDNS captured 132% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 83% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.09. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only TSM, NVDA and KEYS had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CDNS's 1.58, out of eight popular alternatives with the same record.
- KEYS took just 71% of the S&P 500's losses, against 83% for CDNS, while still keeping 121% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CDNS's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS This pageCadence Design Systems, Inc. | 132% | 83% | 1.58 | 1.09 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | 121% | 71% | 1.70 | 1.08 |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 159% | 108% | 1.47 | 1.46 |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | 124% | 108% | 1.16 | 1.17 |
| DSGX The Descartes Systems Group Inc. | 86% | 79% | 1.09 | 0.86 |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 105% | 127% | 0.83 | 1.12 |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 130% | 179% | 0.73 | 1.34 |
What diversifies CDNS?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CDNS's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CDNS with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CDNS into XLE would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+16.9% for CDNS alone, +19.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and PJUL have moved largely independently of CDNS over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- XLE made money in four of the seven calendar years in which CDNS lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CDNS lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CDNS and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2008 | 2007 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +99.8% | 0.56 | −13.8% | −78.5% | −5.0% | −23.2% | −46.2% | −20.3% | −19.3% | 30.1% | +16.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.06 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.3% | +17.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.34 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | 25.1% | +19.6% |
| PJUL Broad MarketInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF | 0.48 | +64.4% | 1.20 | −2.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.9% | +16.3% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.21 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.9% | +17.4% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.00 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.3% | +16.9% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.40 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | +16.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.02 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | — | — | — | 24.4% | +18.2% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.19 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +33.8% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +18.1% | 23.6% | +19.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2008 | 2007 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +99.8% | 0.56 | −13.8% | −78.5% | −5.0% | −23.2% | −46.2% | −20.3% | −19.3% | 30.1% | +16.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.05 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | −36.8% | 24.9% | +22.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.29 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −25.6% | +350% | 29.7% | +34.7% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.01 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | −71.3% | 24.5% | +21.6% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | -0.07 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.5% | +24.6% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.16 | +594% | 1.36 | +24.2% | −67.4% | +26.4% | −14.1% | −33.1% | +9.8% | +133% | 26.1% | +24.4% |
Common questions
What was CDNS's worst drawdown?
CDNS's deepest decline since it began trading in 1987 was 93.1%, from April 1998 to December 2008. It took about nine years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were CDNS's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, CDNS's best year was 2020, when it returned 96.7%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -78.5%.
Is there a better investment than CDNS?
Among CDNS's popular alternatives, TSM and SMH earned more than CDNS over the past 5 years with similar volatility: TSM returned 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 37.2%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ADI (semiconductors) and FFIV (cybersecurity) earned more than CDNS with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 14.8% a year at 37.2%.
Is CDNS more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CDNS's volatility over the past 5 years was 37.2%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CDNS's return lands within 37.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CDNS's Sharpe ratio?
CDNS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.56, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CDNS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CDNS with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CDNS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.59 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CDNS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CDNS holding.
What are the best alternatives to CDNS?
Of the ten popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed CDNS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: NVDA, SMH and TSM.
Did CDNS outperform the S&P 500?
CDNS finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +4.0%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CDNS do in stock market crashes?
CDNS fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when CDNS fell 88.2% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies CDNS?
These had a low correlation with CDNS over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.06), DXJ (correlation 0.34) and PJUL (correlation 0.48); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.05), CLS (correlation 0.29) and MCK (correlation -0.01). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CDNS's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CDNS's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to CDNS
NVDANVIDIA
SMHVanEck Semiconductor ETF
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
KEYSKeysight Technologies
ARMArm
SNPSSynopsys
ADSKAutodesk