Relative Intelligence · Software

How Synopsys (SNPS) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SNPS alone. It places SNPS (Synopsys, Inc.) against 10 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SNPS stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: SNPS's full trading record, from February 1992 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowThe slide is SNPS's own: it is 30.6% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. Even so, over the past 3 months, SNPS rose 18.3% against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0% over the past 3 months, with ADSK (Autodesk, up 12.8%) and PTC (up 54.9%), against 3.9% for the S&P 500. SNPS rose 11.4% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsSNPS has gone against the market, falling 1.3% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (4.3% against 89.3%). A ahead of 90% of stocks worth at least $300 million over 10 years, but behind 79% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 3 years. By year ↓
- Long termSNPS turned $10,000 into $75,600 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. That said, over 5 years SNPS trailed the index: 41.9% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, SNPS fell harder than most of its software peers, including CDNS (Cadence Design Systems), PTC and DSGX. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationSNPS is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.55 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.55 with the total US market, more closely than 83% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, SNPS's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.17: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.2 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.1 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- MSFT (Microsoft, software) and V (Visa, payment processing) earned more than SNPS with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 7.2% a year at 42.3%.
- Whole market
- 1,090 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SNPS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in SNPS have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SNPS over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SNPS over the same span and SNPS's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in SNPS at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $204,671 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SNPS, and APH finished highest, at $3,002,572.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 294 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SNPS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- APH$3M+29,926% total · +21.7% a year
- COST$727,732+7,177% total · +15.9% a year
- MSFT$508,386+4,984% total · +14.5% a year
- LLY$396,376+3,864% total · +13.5% a year
- ADI$385,909+3,759% total · +13.4% a year
- SNPS$204,671+1,947% total · +11.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- CDNS$123,432+1,134% total · +9.1% a year
- INTC$91,990+820% total · +8.0% a year
- PTC$25,432+154% total · +3.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,635 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SNPS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- INTC$24,502+145% total · +19.6% a year
- KEYS$22,159+122% total · +17.2% a year
- CDNS$21,803+118% total · +16.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- SNPS$14,527+45.3% total · +7.8% a year
- PTC$11,712+17.1% total · +3.2% a year
- DSGX$9,951−0.5% total · −0.1% a year
- ADSK$7,329−26.7% total · −6.0% a year
SNPS at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- SNPS is still 30.6% below its all-time high.
- SNPS's deepest decline since it began trading in 1992 was 61.0%, from January 2004 to November 2008. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, SNPS's best was 2020, when it returned 86.2%, and its worst was 2004, when it lost 42.3%. It lost money in ten of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $86B
- Industry
- Software - Infrastructure
- Price history from
- February 1992
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −1.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- −4.3%−1.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- +41.9%+7.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +656%+22.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +86.2%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −42.3%2004
- Losing years
- 10 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 42.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.39return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −61.0%Jan 2004 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −30.6%below the peak
SNPS against the whole market
Where SNPS ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does SNPS rank among all stocks?
This section ranks SNPS on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how SNPS stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- SNPS's 10-year return ranks in the top 10% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
- SNPS's 3-year return ranks in the bottom 21% of the 3,017 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | SNPS | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −1.3% | 2,038 of 3,287 | bottom 39% |
| 3-year return | −4.3% | 2,398 of 3,017 | bottom 22% |
| 5-year return | +41.9% | 1,188 of 2,893 | top 41% |
| 10-year return | +656% | 212 of 2,202 | top 10% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 42.3% | 1,571 of 2,893 | bottom 47% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.39 | 1,268 of 2,893 | top 44% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −43.0% | 231 of 2,187 | top 11% |
What has beaten SNPS on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). SNPS sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than SNPS with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 612 stocks and 478 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SNPS over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 30% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half SNPS's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 42% less than SNPS's 42.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.39 for SNPS. PBR-A earned the most, 51.8% a year, while still swinging less than SNPS (37.5% against 42.3%).
- Among SNPS's popular alternatives, TSM, CDNS and KEYS are in the region. TSM earned 31.5% a year against 7.2% a year for SNPS, at 38.5% volatility, 9% less than SNPS's 42.3%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to SNPS; faint dots are 88 more of the 1,090 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than SNPS?
Investments that beat SNPS over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among SNPS's popular alternatives, CDNS, TSM and KEYS earned more than SNPS with less volatility over the past 5 years. CDNS returned 14.8% a year at 37.2% volatility, against 7.2% a year at 42.3%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSFT (software) and V (payment processing) earned more than SNPS with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 7.2% a year at 42.3%.
- Across the whole market, 1,090 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SNPS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat SNPS over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks SNPS's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than SNPS follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than SNPS's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× SNPS's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than SNPS's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with SNPS?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +7.2% | 42.3% | 0.39 | −43.0% | +656% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.55 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against SNPS. 6 of 9 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +1,139% | 0.79 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +923% | 0.30 | — | ||
PTCPTC Inc. · Application Software | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +8.3% | 35.0% | 0.40 | −54.4% | +317% | 0.48 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.61 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +12.4% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | +219% | 0.24 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Software and the categories next to it (Application Software, Enterprise Software, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus SNPS's specific themes. 38 of 124 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.37 | — | ||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.35 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.19 | — | ||
CPAYCorpay, Inc. · Payment Processing | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +8.2% | 32.5% | 0.41 | −50.1% | +137% | 0.20 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,520 of 3,500 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.06 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.55 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.55 | 0.03% | ||
MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.08 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.17 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.36 | 0.05% | ||
ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | -0.03 | — | |
What these numbers mean for SNPS
- Annual return
- SNPS returned 7.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $14,200. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- SNPS's volatility over the past 5 years was 42.3%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SNPS's return lands within 42.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- SNPS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.39, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SNPS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- SNPS's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 43.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 43.0% fall takes a 75.5% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, SNPS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.55 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SNPS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SNPS holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,090 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than SNPS with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with SNPS | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.06 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.55 | 0.03% | |
| 3 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.55 | 0.03% | |
| 4 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.08 | — |
| 5 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.11 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.17 | — | |
| 7 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.06 | 0.40% |
| 8 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | -0.14 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.30 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.62 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | -0.02 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.37 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.29 | 0.03% | |
| 14 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.00 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | -0.12 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.36 | 0.03% | |
| 17 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.33 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.60 | 0.09% | |
| 19 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.01 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.13 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.40 | 0.04% | |
| 22 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.07 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.23 | 0.06% | |
| 24 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.05 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.50 | 0.06% | |
| 26 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | -0.02 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.17 | — | |
| 28 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.48 | 0.79% |
| 29 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.44 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.24 | — | |
| 31 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.48 | 0.85% |
| 32 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.35 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.62 | 0.04% | |
| 34 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.56 | 0.26% | |
| 35 | Same or nearby category | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.50 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +114% | 0.13 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.12 | 0.08% | |
| 38 | Whole market | +12.5% | 31.3% | 0.53 | −37.1% | +303% | -0.02 | — | |
| 39 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.44 | 0.13% |
| 40 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.18 | 0.27% |
| 41 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.40 | 0.15% |
| 42 | Whole market | +8.4% | 17.9% | 0.54 | −37.2% | +150% | 0.31 | 0.06% | |
| 43 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.11 | 0.08% |
| 44 | Same or nearby category | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.23 | — | |
| 45 | DFATDimensional - US Targeted Value ETF · US Small-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.6% | 21.0% | 0.54 | −26.1% | — | 0.34 | 0.33% |
| 46 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | -0.01 | — |
| 47 | FTSFortis Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.4% | 16.4% | 0.58 | −34.3% | +154% | 0.13 | — |
| 48 | AVEMAvantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.5% | 0.56 | −36.0% | — | 0.35 | 0.33% |
| 49 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.45 | 0.20% |
| 50 | EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.35 | — |
| 51 | EWJiShares MSCI Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.2% | 18.8% | 0.57 | −33.1% | +132% | 0.36 | 0.49% |
| 52 | BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · Buffered Equity | Whole market | +9.9% | 10.5% | 0.96 | −13.7% | — | 0.52 | 0.10% |
| 53 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.16 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | -0.02 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.08 | — | |
| 56 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.38 | 0.39% |
| 57 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.34 | 0.35% |
| 58 | Same or nearby category | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.37 | — | |
| 59 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.49 | 0.40% |
| 60 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.52 | 0.12% |
| 61 | DIVOAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +11.1% | 11.9% | 0.95 | −30.0% | — | 0.29 | 0.56% |
| 62 | MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.46 | 0.46% |
| 63 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.06 | — | |
| 64 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.03 | — |
| 65 | ACAArcosa, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +23.1% | 34.0% | 0.78 | −36.8% | — | 0.30 | — |
| 66 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.03 | — |
| 67 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.50 | 0.60% |
| 68 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.22 | — | |
| 69 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.47 | 0.19% |
| 70 | DBMFiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +9.8% | 12.4% | 0.82 | −20.4% | — | -0.32 | 0.85% |
| 71 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.54 | 0.12% |
| 72 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.59 | 0.40% |
| 73 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.09 | 0.60% |
| 74 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.42 | — | |
| 75 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.52 | 0.50% |
| 76 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.16 | — | |
| 77 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.33 | 0.20% |
| 78 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.42 | 0.25% |
| 79 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | -0.04 | 0.98% |
| 80 | XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF · US Mid-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.7% | 20.5% | 0.56 | −36.9% | +240% | 0.43 | 0.30% |
| 81 | FTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.4% | 0.99 | −20.6% | +158% | 0.48 | 0.95% |
| 82 | OMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Whole market | +9.0% | 16.4% | 0.61 | −33.2% | — | 0.43 | 0.29% |
| 83 | PTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.5% | 11.8% | 0.83 | −26.6% | +188% | 0.37 | 0.60% |
| 84 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.57 | 0.45% |
| 85 | DEMWisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +9.6% | 15.5% | 0.67 | −37.8% | +133% | 0.27 | 0.63% |
| 86 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.35 | 0.58% |
| 87 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.30 | 0.09% |
| 88 | EQWLInvesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.0% | 0.81 | −34.3% | +291% | 0.43 | 0.30% |
| 89 | HDEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +12.8% | 14.2% | 0.92 | −36.4% | +134% | 0.14 | 0.09% |
| 90 | AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +8.6% | 13.1% | 0.69 | −28.4% | +165% | 0.48 | 0.19% |
| 91 | BRCBrady Corporation · Security & Protection Services | Whole market | +12.0% | 26.3% | 0.56 | −36.2% | +188% | 0.15 | — |
| 92 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.33 | 0.05% |
| 93 | ACIOAptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.3% | 11.1% | 0.86 | −14.2% | — | 0.53 | 0.79% |
| 94 | FTHIFirst Trust BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +10.3% | 13.3% | 0.81 | −32.7% | +126% | 0.51 | 0.75% |
| 95 | FLQLFranklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.8% | 16.3% | 0.88 | −33.6% | — | 0.53 | 0.15% |
| 96 | JMOMJPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.1% | 0.73 | −34.3% | — | 0.55 | 0.12% |
| 97 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.07 | — |
| 98 | HFXINYLI FTSE International Equity Currency Neutral ETF · International | Whole market | +11.4% | 15.3% | 0.79 | −32.4% | +180% | 0.36 | 0.19% |
| 99 | NULGNuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.4% | 21.9% | 0.60 | −36.2% | — | 0.65 | 0.26% |
| 100 | Whole market | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 0.57 | — |
SNPS against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against SNPS, compared period by period and year by year.
How do SNPS's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at SNPS, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Four of the nine popular alternatives, led by TSM, CDNS and KEYS, were both more rewarding and calmer than SNPS over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, SNPS returned 7.2% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (42.3% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than SNPS with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | +14.8% | 37.2% |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | +13.9% | 34.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | +12.4% | 55.6% |
| PTC PTC Inc. | +8.3% | 35.0% |
| SNPS This pageSynopsys, Inc. | +7.2% | 42.3% |
| DSGX The Descartes Systems Group Inc. | +1.8% | 31.8% |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | −3.8% | 36.4% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | −7.5% | 37.1% |
Has SNPS consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares SNPS with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than SNPS helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Five of the ten popular alternatives, led by NVDA, TSM and KEYS, outperformed SNPS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- CDNS and KEYS earned more for the risk they took than SNPS (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than SNPS over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. (this page) | — | +11.4% | +18.3% | −2.9% | −6.8% | −1.3% | −4.3% | +41.9% | +656% | 42.3% | 0.39 | −43.0% | — | $86B | — |
| NVDA QualifiedNVIDIA Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| TSM QualifiedTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 3/5 short3/3 long | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| KEYS QualifiedKeysight Technologies, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −2.3% | +6.4% | −0.3% | +61.8% | +103% | +172% | +91.9% | +923% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | — | $57B | — |
| PTC QualifiedPTC Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +42.9% | +54.9% | +37.4% | +13.7% | −6.1% | +40.4% | +49.3% | +317% | 35.0% | 0.40 | −54.4% | — | $21B | — |
| INTC QualifiedIntel Corp. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −24.7% | −5.5% | +39.6% | +133% | +141% | +167% | +79.8% | +219% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | — | $485B | — |
| CDNS Software - ApplicationCadence Design Systems, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +8.5% | −3.0% | +0.4% | +3.1% | −3.0% | +34.0% | +99.8% | +1,139% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | — | $88B | — |
| DSGX Software - ApplicationThe Descartes Systems Group Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +13.7% | +22.5% | +17.3% | +6.0% | −5.9% | +24.5% | +9.2% | +324% | 31.8% | 0.21 | −48.7% | — | $7.7B | — |
| ARM SemiconductorsArm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | 3/5 short1/3 long | −31.5% | −18.0% | +26.2% | +92.7% | +28.9% | +362% | — | — | — | — | −54.0% | — | $236B | — |
| ADSK Software - ApplicationAutodesk, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +12.2% | +12.8% | +0.1% | −14.4% | −20.3% | +21.2% | −17.8% | +245% | 36.4% | 0.07 | −52.0% | — | $51B | — |
| BSY Software - ApplicationBentley Systems, Incorporated | 3/5 short0/3 long | +19.6% | +18.1% | +8.8% | +0.6% | −25.6% | −22.4% | −32.4% | — | 37.1% | -0.03 | −61.0% | — | $11B | — |
How did SNPS do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where SNPS ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with SNPS and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- SNPS finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, NVDA came out ahead of SNPS most often, in 19 of the 26 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SNPS finished in the top quarter in eight of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in six. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 11.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of SNPS; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places SNPS among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of SNPS | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS This pageSynopsys, Inc. | — | −3.2% | −5.7% | +61.3% | −13.4% | +42.1% | +86.2% | +65.2% | −1.2% | +44.8% | +29.0% | +4.9% | +7.1% | +27.4% | +17.1% | +1.1% | +20.8% | +20.3% | −28.6% | −3.0% | +33.3% | +2.6% | −42.3% | +46.7% | −21.9% | +24.5% | −28.9% | +23.0% | +51.7% | −22.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 8 of 29 | 7 of 11 | 9 of 11 | 4 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 4 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 6 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 7 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 5 of 8 | 5 of 8 | 4 of 8 | 8 of 8 | 2 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 2 of 8 | 8 of 8 | 8 of 8 | 7 of 8 | 1 of 8 | 4 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 4 of 6 | 2 of 6 | 5 of 5 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 19 of 26 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% | +1.6% | +102% | −82.8% | +308% | +39.6% | — | — | — |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 14 of 28 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +52.9% | −16.1% | −4.3% | +18.9% | +27.1% | −4.2% | +56.7% | −54.8% | +39.5% | −51.0% | +290% | +13.4% | — |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | 4 of 11 | +26.5% | +1.0% | −7.0% | −17.2% | +56.3% | +28.7% | +65.3% | +49.2% | +13.8% | +29.1% | −16.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 14 of 29 | −5.3% | +5.1% | +45.8% | −0.9% | +1.3% | +59.7% | −9.7% | +36.4% | +31.3% | +33.6% | −5.5% | +3.6% | +57.2% | +23.3% | −18.9% | +37.9% | +29.2% | −29.1% | −0.9% | +18.2% | +3.6% | +49.4% | +56.4% | −67.7% | −41.9% | −50.3% | +66.6% | −31.4% | −7.8% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 15 of 29 | +84.0% | −59.6% | +94.5% | −46.6% | +6.0% | −14.7% | +30.7% | +4.2% | +30.9% | +8.7% | −2.2% | +44.3% | +30.9% | −12.0% | +19.4% | +6.3% | +43.9% | −43.5% | +34.2% | −17.2% | +8.1% | −26.6% | +107% | −50.3% | +4.9% | −26.9% | +39.1% | +69.0% | +7.4% |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 17 of 29 | +4.0% | +10.3% | +69.5% | −13.8% | +36.6% | +96.7% | +59.5% | +4.0% | +65.8% | +21.2% | +9.7% | +35.3% | +3.8% | +29.9% | +25.9% | +37.9% | +63.7% | −78.5% | −5.0% | +5.9% | +22.5% | −23.2% | +52.5% | −46.2% | −20.3% | +14.6% | −19.3% | +21.4% | +24.1% |
| DSGX The Descartes Systems Group Inc. | 11 of 26 | −22.8% | +35.1% | +20.7% | −15.8% | +41.4% | +36.9% | +61.5% | −6.8% | +32.7% | +6.6% | +35.5% | +10.7% | +44.0% | +29.9% | +1.7% | +18.7% | +98.3% | −28.8% | +13.8% | +17.5% | +57.0% | −29.1% | −9.0% | −58.4% | −69.0% | +11.6% | — | — | — |
| ARM Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | 1 of 2 | −11.4% | +64.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +0.1% | +21.4% | +30.3% | −33.5% | −7.9% | +66.4% | +42.6% | +22.7% | +41.6% | +21.5% | +1.5% | +19.4% | +42.4% | +16.6% | −20.6% | +50.3% | +29.3% | −60.5% | +23.0% | −5.8% | +13.2% | +210% | +73.0% | −22.5% | +39.5% | −19.5% | −20.3% | +16.3% | +33.0% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | 0 of 5 | −17.8% | −10.1% | +41.8% | −23.3% | +19.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How SNPS has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were SNPS's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents SNPS's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1992, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of SNPS's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: SNPS fell 60.7% from December 1999 to August 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 5.3%.
- The slowest recovery came after SNPS fell 61.0% from January 2004 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until July 2013, five years later.
Green means SNPS fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | SNPS fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −61.0% | −28.8% | Jan 2004 | Nov 2008 | 4.8 years | Jul 2013 | 4.7 years |
| Dot-com bust | −60.7% | +5.3% | Dec 1999 | Aug 2000 | 8 months | Jan 2004 | 3.4 years |
| No named crash | −49.7% | +2.5% | Nov 1996 | Apr 1997 | 5 months | Nov 1998 | 19 months |
| No named crash | −43.0% | +20.7% | Jul 2025 | Sep 2026 | 14 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −38.7% | −8.2% | Jul 2024 | Apr 2025 | 9 months | Jul 2025 | 3 months |
How did SNPS do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far SNPS, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, KEYS held up best, falling less than SNPS in four of the six crashes they both traded through.
- SNPS fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when SNPS fell 22.8% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than SNPS.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS This pageSynopsys, Inc. | — | −3.7% | −29.3% | −34.3% | −20.3% | −8.4% | −22.8% | −13.7% | −1.9% | −49.1% | −48.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0 of 10 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 4 of 10 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −2.6% | −33.8% | −17.7% | −18.0% | −6.7% | −37.2% | — | — | — | — |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 2 of 10 | −4.3% | −20.4% | −45.3% | −27.8% | −4.9% | −24.9% | −33.9% | −3.0% | −66.1% | −94.5% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 6 of 10 | −1.0% | −54.1% | −33.5% | −13.0% | −6.7% | −19.7% | −16.2% | −0.9% | −55.2% | −82.3% |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −1.8% | −24.3% | −32.1% | −14.1% | −10.4% | −19.3% | −21.4% | −4.6% | −88.2% | −72.3% |
| DSGX The Descartes Systems Group Inc. | 3 of 10 | −2.4% | −27.9% | −37.0% | −28.0% | −8.4% | −24.7% | −19.9% | 0.0% | −55.6% | −97.7% |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −5.1% | −40.9% | −35.5% | −24.2% | −6.9% | −34.7% | −36.9% | −1.6% | −76.9% | −63.6% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | 0 of 2 | −4.3% | −39.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does SNPS move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares SNPS with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, SNPS captured 124% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 108% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.17. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Four of the eight popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SNPS's 1.16, led by TSM, NVDA and KEYS.
- KEYS took just 71% of the S&P 500's losses, against 108% for SNPS, while still keeping 121% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than SNPS's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS This pageSynopsys, Inc. | 124% | 108% | 1.16 | 1.17 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | 121% | 71% | 1.70 | 1.08 |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 132% | 83% | 1.58 | 1.09 |
| DSGX The Descartes Systems Group Inc. | 86% | 79% | 1.09 | 0.86 |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 98% | 100% | 0.98 | 1.43 |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 105% | 127% | 0.83 | 1.12 |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 130% | 179% | 0.73 | 1.34 |
What diversifies SNPS?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with SNPS's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing SNPS with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in SNPS into CAH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+7.8% for SNPS alone, +14.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and PJUL have moved largely independently of SNPS over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in six of the ten calendar years in which SNPS lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which SNPS lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% SNPS and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2008 | 2007 | 2004 | 2002 | 2000 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +41.9% | 0.39 | −3.2% | −5.7% | −13.4% | −1.2% | −28.6% | −3.0% | −42.3% | −21.9% | −28.9% | −22.7% | 34.5% | +7.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.06 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +15.9% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27.8% | +10.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.23 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +29.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | 28.3% | +12.3% |
| PJUL Broad MarketInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF | 0.48 | +64.4% | 1.20 | +12.8% | +13.8% | −2.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.4% | +9.2% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.24 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +33.4% | +10.4% | −8.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.4% | +10.2% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.11 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +14.1% | +7.1% | −3.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.0% | +9.7% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.48 | +62.9% | 0.99 | +9.1% | +18.8% | −5.6% | −4.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.4% | +9.2% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.34 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | +13.4% | −5.1% | −9.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.4% | +9.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.01 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | +26.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | — | — | — | 27.8% | +11.1% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2008 | 2007 | 2004 | 2002 | 2000 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +41.9% | 0.39 | −3.2% | −5.7% | −13.4% | −1.2% | −28.6% | −3.0% | −42.3% | −21.9% | −28.9% | −22.7% | 34.5% | +7.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | -0.06 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +19.0% | +54.1% | −24.5% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −4.7% | −8.3% | +108% | +29.1% | 27.7% | +14.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.34 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +215% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −2.3% | — | 33.4% | +26.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.39 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +107% | +17.0% | +0.8% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +40.0% | −9.4% | −71.1% | — | 32.1% | +22.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.03 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +23.7% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +61.2% | +96.3% | 27.9% | +14.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | -0.02 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | −4.0% | +86.6% | −8.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.2% | +17.0% |
Common questions
What was SNPS's worst drawdown?
SNPS's deepest decline since it began trading in 1992 was 61.0%, from January 2004 to November 2008. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were SNPS's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, SNPS's best year was 2020, when it returned 86.2%. Its worst was 2004, with a return of -42.3%.
Is there a better investment than SNPS?
Among SNPS's popular alternatives, CDNS, TSM and KEYS earned more than SNPS with less volatility over the past 5 years. CDNS returned 14.8% a year at 37.2% volatility, against 7.2% a year at 42.3%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSFT (software) and V (payment processing) earned more than SNPS with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 7.2% a year at 42.3%.
Is SNPS more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. SNPS's volatility over the past 5 years was 42.3%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SNPS's return lands within 42.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is SNPS's Sharpe ratio?
SNPS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.39, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SNPS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is SNPS with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, SNPS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.55 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SNPS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SNPS holding.
What are the best alternatives to SNPS?
Of the ten popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed SNPS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: NVDA, TSM and KEYS.
Did SNPS outperform the S&P 500?
SNPS finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -3.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did SNPS do in stock market crashes?
SNPS fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when SNPS fell 22.8% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies SNPS?
These had a low correlation with SNPS over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.06), DXJ (correlation 0.23) and PJUL (correlation 0.48); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.06), CLS (correlation 0.34) and FIX (correlation 0.39). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than SNPS's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of SNPS's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to SNPS
NVDANVIDIA
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
KEYSKeysight Technologies
INTCIntel
CDNSCadence Design Systems
ARMArm
ADSKAutodesk