Relative Intelligence · Application Software

How Autodesk (ADSK) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ADSK alone. It places ADSK (Autodesk, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ADSK stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ADSK's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowThe slide is ADSK's own: it is 28.2% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. ADSK has trailed the market, rising 0.1% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the application software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0% over the past 3 months, with ORCL (Oracle, up 8.4%) and SAP (up 44.6%), against 3.9% for the S&P 500. ADSK rose 12.2% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, ADSK fell 20.3% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (21.2% against 89.3%). The last two calendar years both went the same way: ADSK rose 0.1% in 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. By year ↓
- Long termADSK turned $10,000 into $34,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, ADSK has typically fallen 1.6 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, ADSK has a correlation of 0.60 over 5 years, more closely than 90% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- J (Jacobs Solutions), SAP and TT (Trane Technologies) earned more than ADSK with less volatility over the past 5 years. J returned 5.3% a year at 26.2% volatility, against a loss of 3.8% a year at 36.4%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- MSFT (Microsoft, software) and ADI (Analog Devices, semiconductors) earned more than ADSK with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 3.8% a year at 36.4%.
- Whole market
- 1,859 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ADSK with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in ADSK have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ADSK over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ADSK over the same span and ADSK's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in ADSK at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $194,061 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ADSK, and TYL finished highest, at $926,134.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 303 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ADSK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- TYL$926,134+9,161% total · +16.9% a year
- TT$405,736+3,957% total · +13.6% a year
- ORCL$284,972+2,750% total · +12.2% a year
- J$234,448+2,244% total · +11.5% a year
- SNPS$204,671+1,947% total · +11.0% a year
- ADSK$194,061+1,841% total · +10.8% a year
- SAP$136,626+1,266% total · +9.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- NEM$39,676+297% total · +4.9% a year
- PTC$25,432+154% total · +3.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,996 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ADSK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- TT$27,878+179% total · +22.8% a year
- CDNS$21,803+118% total · +16.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- SAP$16,715+67.2% total · +10.8% a year
- SNPS$14,527+45.3% total · +7.8% a year
- MANH$12,984+29.8% total · +5.4% a year
- J$12,939+29.4% total · +5.3% a year
- PTC$11,712+17.1% total · +3.2% a year
- NOW$10,768+7.7% total · +1.5% a year
- ADSK$7,329−26.7% total · −6.0% a year
ADSK at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- ADSK is still 28.2% below its all-time high.
- ADSK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 76.9%, from December 2007 to March 2009. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, ADSK's best was 2004, when it returned 210%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 60.5%. It lost money in eight of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $51B
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −20.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +21.2%+6.6% a year
- Past 5 years
- −17.8%−3.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +245%+13.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +210%2004
- Worst calendar year
- −60.5%2008
- Losing years
- 8 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 36.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.07return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −76.9%Dec 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −28.2%below the peak
ADSK against the whole market
Where ADSK ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ADSK rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ADSK on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ADSK stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ADSK's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 24% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
- ADSK's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 20% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ADSK | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −20.3% | 2,643 of 3,287 | bottom 21% |
| 3-year return | +21.2% | 2,003 of 3,017 | bottom 35% |
| 5-year return | −17.8% | 1,973 of 2,893 | bottom 33% |
| 10-year return | +245% | 719 of 2,202 | top 33% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 36.4% | 1,233 of 2,893 | top 43% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.07 | 2,178 of 2,893 | bottom 26% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −52.0% | 531 of 2,187 | top 24% |
What has beaten ADSK on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ADSK sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ADSK with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 909 stocks and 950 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ADSK over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 51% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half ADSK's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 32% less than ADSK's 36.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.07 for ADSK. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than ADSK (33.4% against 36.4%).
- Among ADSK's popular alternatives, TT, SAP and J are in the region. TT earned 22.7% a year against a loss of 3.8% a year for ADSK, at 27.7% volatility, 24% less than ADSK's 36.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ADSK; faint dots are 89 more of the 1,859 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than ADSK?
Investments that beat ADSK over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ADSK's popular alternatives, J, SAP and TT earned more than ADSK with less volatility over the past 5 years. J returned 5.3% a year at 26.2% volatility, against a loss of 3.8% a year at 36.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSFT (software) and ADI (semiconductors) earned more than ADSK with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 3.8% a year at 36.4%.
- Across the whole market, 1,859 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ADSK with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ADSK over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ADSK's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ADSK follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ADSK's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ADSK's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ADSK's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ADSK?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −3.8% | 36.4% | 0.07 | −52.0% | +245% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.60 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ADSK. 12 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
JJacobs Solutions Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +5.3% | 26.2% | 0.33 | −39.3% | +266% | 0.45 | — | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +7.2% | 42.3% | 0.39 | −43.0% | +656% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 0.70 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +1,139% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +7.7% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | +300% | 0.46 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Application Software and Software and the categories next to it (Enterprise Software, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus ADSK's specific themes. 42 of 118 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.57 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.15 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | 0.15 | — | ||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.42 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.24 | 0.35% | ||
DOXAmdocs Limited · Application Software | Similar return, lower volatility | −3.0% | 21.8% | -0.03 | −46.1% | +26.9% | 0.55 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,302 of 3,495 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.60 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.05 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.26 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.48 | 0.18% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +510% | 0.14 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | −4.8% | 27.3% | -0.04 | −45.4% | +107% | 0.38 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for ADSK
- Annual return
- ADSK lost 3.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $8,220. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ADSK's volatility over the past 5 years was 36.4%, 2.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ADSK's return lands within 36.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ADSK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.07, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ADSK earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ADSK's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 52.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 52.0% fall takes a 108% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ADSK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ADSK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ADSK holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,859 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ADSK with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ADSK | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.11 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.60 | 0.03% | |
| 3 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.32 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.05 | — | |
| 5 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.26 | 0.48% |
| 6 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.48 | 0.18% | |
| 7 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.32 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.18 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.15 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.28 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.23 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.27 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.11 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.56 | 0.04% | |
| 15 | Whole market | +2.9% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | +366% | 0.35 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.49 | 0.06% | |
| 17 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.18 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.24 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.30 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.44 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.22 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.27 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.61 | 0.04% | |
| 24 | Same or nearby category | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.57 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.3% | 0.71 | −34.1% | +293% | 0.57 | 0.15% | |
| 26 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.13 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.43 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +12.5% | 31.3% | 0.53 | −37.1% | +303% | 0.16 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +6.1% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | +270% | 0.27 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +2.6% | 30.6% | 0.24 | −43.2% | +306% | 0.43 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +2.5% | 22.1% | 0.23 | −36.9% | +281% | 0.08 | — | |
| 32 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.47 | 0.20% |
| 33 | EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.41 | — |
| 34 | VRSNVeriSign, Inc. · Internet Services | Whole market | +7.8% | 25.9% | 0.42 | −38.9% | +308% | 0.46 | — |
| 35 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.18 | 0.59% |
| 36 | MTDMettler-Toledo International Inc. · Life Sciences Tools | Whole market | +2.6% | 32.5% | 0.24 | −43.5% | +298% | 0.41 | — |
| 37 | MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +10.9% | 22.1% | 0.58 | −34.1% | +336% | 0.29 | 0.15% |
| 38 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.19 | — |
| 39 | Same or nearby category | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.15 | — | |
| 40 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.57 | 0.40% |
| 41 | IXNiShares Global Tech ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +19.2% | 26.2% | 0.81 | −36.3% | +720% | 0.41 | 0.37% |
| 42 | Same or nearby category | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | 0.15 | — | |
| 43 | MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.63 | 0.46% |
| 44 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.19 | — |
| 45 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.50 | — | |
| 46 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.48 | 0.40% |
| 47 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.50 | 0.50% |
| 48 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.01 | — | |
| 49 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.34 | 0.40% |
| 50 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.14 | — | |
| 51 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.50 | 0.69% |
| 52 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.40 | 0.05% | |
| 53 | SUSAiShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.4% | 17.4% | 0.66 | −32.9% | +302% | 0.60 | 0.25% |
| 54 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.42 | 0.58% |
| 55 | NICNicolet Bankshares, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 30.1% | 0.73 | −44.3% | +344% | 0.17 | — |
| 56 | EQWLInvesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.0% | 0.81 | −34.3% | +291% | 0.60 | 0.30% |
| 57 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.11 | — | |
| 58 | CHEChemed Corporation · Health Care Services | Whole market | +3.4% | 25.3% | 0.26 | −42.9% | +273% | 0.22 | — |
| 59 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.18 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.49 | 0.03% | |
| 61 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 22.8% | 0.77 | −32.3% | +286% | 0.37 | — |
| 62 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.18 | — | |
| 63 | IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF · Software | Same or nearby category | +4.4% | 28.9% | 0.29 | −45.9% | +383% | 0.65 | 0.38% |
| 64 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.43 | 0.03% | |
| 65 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.28 | 0.60% |
| 66 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.25 | — | |
| 67 | BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | 0.06 | — |
| 68 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.08 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +151% | 0.17 | — | |
| 70 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.30 | 0.45% |
| 71 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.11 | — | |
| 72 | PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Technology | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.1% | 0.73 | −28.1% | +305% | 0.33 | 0.65% |
| 73 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.17 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.06 | — | |
| 75 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.59 | 0.19% |
| 76 | QQEWFirst Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF · Technology | Whole market | +6.8% | 21.3% | 0.42 | −32.1% | +267% | 0.56 | 0.55% |
| 77 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.32 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.10 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +198% | 0.56 | 0.03% | |
| 80 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.16 | — | |
| 81 | QQQEDirexion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +8.1% | 20.7% | 0.48 | −32.1% | +294% | 0.54 | 0.35% |
| 82 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.24 | — | |
| 83 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · International | Whole market | +13.8% | 15.1% | 0.94 | −34.4% | +261% | 0.49 | 0.50% |
| 84 | FSBCFive Star Bancorp · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.1% | 31.3% | 0.58 | −40.8% | +297% | 0.05 | — |
| 85 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.32 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.35 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.46 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +7.1% | 22.9% | 0.42 | −38.7% | +295% | 0.35 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +6.2% | 20.6% | 0.40 | −42.0% | +179% | 0.52 | 0.03% | |
| 90 | Whole market | +7.1% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | +313% | 0.67 | — | |
| 91 | RCBCRiver City Bank · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.6% | 27.2% | 0.64 | −45.5% | +345% | 0.03 | — |
| 92 | Whole market | +5.2% | 8.9% | 0.61 | −25.4% | +37.8% | 0.27 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.31 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.58 | 0.21% | |
| 95 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.24 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.50 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +5.5% | 21.5% | 0.36 | −30.1% | +89.8% | 0.22 | — | |
| 98 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.52 | 0.79% |
| 99 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.1% | 0.57 | −39.0% | +211% | 0.56 | 0.20% | |
| 100 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.57 | 0.85% |
ADSK against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ADSK, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ADSK's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ADSK, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Five of the 20 popular alternatives, led by TT, SAP and PTC, were both more rewarding and calmer than ADSK over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, ADSK returned -3.8% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (36.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ADSK with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| TT Trane Technologies plc | +22.7% | 27.7% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | +18.6% | 39.1% |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | +14.8% | 37.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| SAP SAP SE | +11.5% | 30.0% |
| PTC PTC Inc. | +8.3% | 35.0% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | +7.2% | 42.3% |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | +6.5% | 40.2% |
| J Jacobs Solutions Inc. | +5.3% | 26.2% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | +1.9% | 45.5% |
| ACM Aecom | −1.0% | 27.7% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | −3.2% | 39.4% |
| ADSK This pageAutodesk, Inc. | −3.8% | 36.4% |
| ACN Accenture plc | −5.2% | 32.7% |
| TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | −5.9% | 33.3% |
| TRMB Trimble Inc. | −6.4% | 33.5% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | −7.5% | 37.1% |
| PCOR Procore Technologies, Inc. | −9.5% | 49.7% |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | −16.5% | 38.1% |
| U Unity Software Inc. | −22.4% | 77.5% |
Has ADSK consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ADSK with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ADSK helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Eight of the 20 popular alternatives, led by PTC, NOW and MANH, outperformed ADSK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- PTC, NOW and MANH outperformed ADSK in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- TT, CDNS and SNPS earned more for the risk they took than ADSK (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ADSK over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. (this page) | — | +12.2% | +12.8% | +0.1% | −14.4% | −20.3% | +21.2% | −17.8% | +245% | 36.4% | 0.07 | −52.0% | — | $51B | — |
| PTC QualifiedPTC Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +42.9% | +54.9% | +37.4% | +13.7% | −6.1% | +40.4% | +49.3% | +317% | 35.0% | 0.40 | −54.4% | — | $21B | — |
| NOW QualifiedServiceNow, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +8.6% | +42.8% | +50.0% | +1.4% | −18.5% | +37.8% | +9.8% | +848% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | — | $155B | — |
| MANH QualifiedManhattan Associates, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +11.2% | +40.7% | +74.0% | +39.2% | +16.4% | +22.3% | +37.1% | +344% | 40.2% | 0.36 | −61.0% | — | $14B | — |
| NEM QualifiedNewmont Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −5.1% | +31.2% | +2.2% | +16.1% | +24.3% | +219% | +135% | +304% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | — | $123B | — |
| NVDA QualifiedNVIDIA Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| J QualifiedJacobs Solutions Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −2.8% | +8.1% | +9.0% | +4.0% | −13.2% | +31.1% | +29.6% | +266% | 26.2% | 0.33 | −39.3% | — | $16B | — |
| SAP QualifiedSAP SE | 4/5 short2/3 long | +9.4% | +44.6% | +29.6% | −2.1% | −16.6% | +81.3% | +72.6% | +205% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | — | $267B | — |
| SNPS QualifiedSynopsys, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +11.4% | +18.3% | −2.9% | −6.8% | −1.3% | −4.3% | +41.9% | +656% | 42.3% | 0.39 | −43.0% | — | $86B | — |
| CDNS Software - ApplicationCadence Design Systems, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +8.5% | −3.0% | +0.4% | +3.1% | −3.0% | +34.0% | +99.8% | +1,139% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | — | $88B | — |
| TT Industrial - MachineryTrane Technologies plc | 2/5 short3/3 long | +6.5% | −1.2% | −2.9% | +16.8% | +11.3% | +154% | +178% | +955% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | — | $102B | — |
| ORCL Software - InfrastructureOracle Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | +300% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| CRM Software - ApplicationSalesforce, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +2.5% | +39.7% | +30.7% | −3.8% | −3.9% | +21.3% | −14.8% | +240% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | — | $200B | — |
| U Software - ApplicationUnity Software Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −7.1% | +34.7% | +51.4% | −9.2% | +13.9% | +47.8% | −71.8% | — | 77.5% | 0.06 | −93.1% | — | $18B | — |
| TRMB Hardware, Equipment & PartsTrimble Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +7.6% | +16.7% | −10.6% | −20.7% | −20.9% | +27.3% | −28.2% | +111% | 33.5% | -0.03 | −57.4% | — | $14B | — |
| ACM Engineering & ConstructionAecom | 0/5 short1/3 long | −5.8% | −12.7% | −31.1% | −37.8% | −55.1% | −21.6% | −4.7% | +128% | 27.7% | 0.10 | −56.1% | — | $7.6B | — |
| ACN Information Technology ServicesAccenture plc | 5/5 short0/3 long | +29.5% | +66.5% | +25.1% | −4.8% | +2.2% | −13.6% | −23.6% | +146% | 32.7% | 0.00 | −67.8% | — | $146B | — |
| PCOR Software - ApplicationProcore Technologies, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +17.5% | +31.3% | +9.0% | −13.3% | −16.1% | −3.4% | −39.3% | — | 49.7% | 0.05 | −63.8% | — | $9.2B | — |
| TYL Software - ApplicationTyler Technologies, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +13.4% | +18.6% | +9.0% | −13.5% | −26.1% | +2.6% | −26.3% | +132% | 33.3% | -0.02 | −57.4% | — | $15B | — |
| BSY Software - ApplicationBentley Systems, Incorporated | 4/5 short0/3 long | +19.6% | +18.1% | +8.8% | +0.6% | −25.6% | −22.4% | −32.4% | — | 37.1% | -0.03 | −61.0% | — | $11B | — |
| ADBE Software - ApplicationAdobe Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.9% | +9.4% | +3.3% | −23.0% | −25.2% | −52.5% | −59.4% | +135% | 38.1% | -0.28 | −71.9% | — | $100B | — |
How did ADSK do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where ADSK ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ADSK and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- ADSK finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 16 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, NOW came out ahead of ADSK most often, in ten of the 13 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ADSK finished in the top quarter in five of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 9 of 21.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ADSK; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ADSK among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ADSK | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK This pageAutodesk, Inc. | — | +0.1% | +21.4% | +30.3% | −33.5% | −7.9% | +66.4% | +42.6% | +22.7% | +41.6% | +21.5% | +1.5% | +19.4% | +42.4% | +16.6% | −20.6% | +50.3% | +29.3% | −60.5% | +23.0% | −5.8% | +13.2% | +210% | +73.0% | −22.5% | +39.5% | −19.5% | −20.3% | +16.3% | +33.0% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 29 | 9 of 21 | 11 of 21 | 16 of 21 | 12 of 21 | 20 of 20 | 5 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 5 of 18 | 7 of 18 | 8 of 18 | 11 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 7 of 18 | 13 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 5 of 16 | 15 of 16 | 7 of 16 | 1 of 15 | 5 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 4 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 12 of 13 | 7 of 12 | 5 of 12 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 11 of 29 | −5.3% | +5.1% | +45.8% | −0.9% | +1.3% | +59.7% | −9.7% | +36.4% | +31.3% | +33.6% | −5.5% | +3.6% | +57.2% | +23.3% | −18.9% | +37.9% | +29.2% | −29.1% | −0.9% | +18.2% | +3.6% | +49.4% | +56.4% | −67.7% | −41.9% | −50.3% | +66.6% | −31.4% | −7.8% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 10 of 13 | −27.8% | +50.0% | +82.0% | −40.2% | +17.9% | +95.0% | +58.6% | +36.5% | +75.4% | −14.1% | +27.6% | +21.2% | +86.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 15 of 27 | −35.9% | +25.5% | +77.4% | −21.9% | +47.8% | +31.9% | +88.2% | −14.5% | −6.6% | −19.9% | +62.5% | +38.6% | +94.6% | +49.1% | +32.5% | +27.1% | +52.1% | −40.1% | −12.4% | +46.9% | −14.2% | −13.6% | +16.7% | −18.8% | −31.6% | +479% | −73.0% | — | — |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 9 of 29 | +173% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −20.8% | +7.4% | +40.3% | +30.5% | −6.2% | +10.9% | +90.1% | −4.4% | −17.2% | −48.5% | −20.4% | −0.6% | +31.0% | +17.3% | −15.9% | +9.1% | −14.8% | +21.4% | −8.1% | +68.2% | +52.6% | +12.7% | −29.9% | +35.0% | −37.7% | −34.1% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 18 of 26 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% | +1.6% | +102% | −82.8% | +308% | +39.6% | — | — | — |
| J Jacobs Solutions Inc. | 16 of 29 | +1.1% | +24.3% | +9.2% | −13.0% | +28.7% | +22.5% | +55.2% | −10.6% | +17.0% | +35.9% | −6.1% | −29.0% | +47.9% | +4.9% | −11.5% | +21.9% | −21.8% | −49.7% | +134% | +20.1% | +42.1% | −0.5% | +34.9% | +7.9% | +42.8% | +42.1% | −20.2% | +60.3% | +7.4% |
| SAP SAP SE | 14 of 29 | −0.4% | +61.3% | +52.3% | −24.2% | +9.2% | −1.3% | +36.4% | −10.0% | +31.7% | +11.1% | +15.3% | −18.6% | +10.0% | +55.8% | +6.0% | +9.8% | +31.4% | −28.0% | −2.6% | +18.7% | +2.8% | +7.0% | +114% | −38.7% | −4.9% | −35.1% | +45.1% | +38.0% | +138% |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −3.2% | −5.7% | +61.3% | −13.4% | +42.1% | +86.2% | +65.2% | −1.2% | +44.8% | +29.0% | +4.9% | +7.1% | +27.4% | +17.1% | +1.1% | +20.8% | +20.3% | −28.6% | −3.0% | +33.3% | +2.6% | −42.3% | +46.7% | −21.9% | +24.5% | −28.9% | +23.0% | +51.7% | −22.7% |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 17 of 29 | +4.0% | +10.3% | +69.5% | −13.8% | +36.6% | +96.7% | +59.5% | +4.0% | +65.8% | +21.2% | +9.7% | +35.3% | +3.8% | +29.9% | +25.9% | +37.9% | +63.7% | −78.5% | −5.0% | +5.9% | +22.5% | −23.2% | +52.5% | −46.2% | −20.3% | +14.6% | −19.3% | +21.4% | +24.1% |
| TT Trane Technologies plc | 14 of 29 | +6.4% | +53.0% | +47.4% | −15.3% | +41.0% | +43.4% | +48.3% | +4.4% | +21.3% | +38.5% | −11.1% | +4.6% | +29.9% | +59.3% | −34.7% | +32.6% | +110% | −62.0% | +20.2% | −1.7% | +1.7% | +19.6% | +59.7% | +4.3% | +1.2% | −23.0% | +17.7% | +17.9% | +38.1% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 14 of 29 | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% | +24.3% | +19.4% | −3.0% | +24.9% | +6.9% | −17.6% | +19.0% | +15.7% | +31.8% | −17.5% | +28.6% | +39.4% | −21.4% | +31.7% | +40.4% | −11.0% | +3.6% | +22.6% | −21.8% | −52.5% | +3.7% | +290% | +93.5% | −19.9% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 13 of 21 | −20.2% | +27.8% | +98.5% | −47.8% | +14.2% | +36.8% | +18.7% | +34.0% | +49.3% | −12.7% | +32.2% | +7.5% | +31.3% | +65.8% | −23.2% | +79.0% | +130% | −49.0% | +72.0% | +13.7% | +88.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| U Unity Software Inc. | 3 of 5 | +96.6% | −45.1% | +43.0% | −80.0% | −6.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TRMB Trimble Inc. | 13 of 29 | +10.9% | +32.8% | +5.2% | −42.0% | +30.6% | +60.2% | +26.7% | −19.0% | +34.8% | +40.6% | −19.2% | −23.5% | +16.1% | +37.7% | +8.7% | +58.5% | +16.6% | −28.5% | +19.2% | +43.0% | +7.4% | +33.0% | +199% | −23.0% | −32.5% | +11.1% | +198% | −66.8% | +89.6% |
| ACM Aecom | 4 of 18 | −9.9% | +16.7% | +9.8% | +10.7% | +55.4% | +15.4% | +62.7% | −28.6% | +2.2% | +21.1% | −1.1% | +3.2% | +23.7% | +15.7% | −26.5% | +1.7% | −10.5% | +7.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ACN Accenture plc | 8 of 24 | −22.1% | +1.9% | +33.6% | −34.8% | +60.7% | +26.0% | +51.2% | −6.2% | +33.3% | +14.3% | +20.8% | +11.4% | +26.6% | +27.7% | +12.0% | +19.1% | +29.0% | −7.5% | −1.4% | +29.3% | +8.3% | +2.6% | +46.3% | −33.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| PCOR Procore Technologies, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −2.9% | +8.3% | +46.7% | −41.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | 15 of 29 | −21.3% | +37.9% | +29.7% | −40.1% | +23.2% | +45.5% | +61.5% | +5.0% | +24.0% | −18.1% | +59.3% | +7.2% | +111% | +60.9% | +45.0% | +4.3% | +66.2% | −7.1% | −8.3% | +60.1% | +5.0% | −13.2% | +131% | −8.3% | +169% | −69.3% | −10.3% | +11.5% | +193% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | 3 of 5 | −17.8% | −10.1% | +41.8% | −23.3% | +19.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 17 of 29 | −21.3% | −25.5% | +77.3% | −40.6% | +13.4% | +51.6% | +45.8% | +29.1% | +70.2% | +9.6% | +29.2% | +21.4% | +58.9% | +33.3% | −8.2% | −16.3% | +72.8% | −50.2% | +3.9% | +11.3% | +17.9% | +60.7% | +57.9% | −20.0% | −46.6% | +73.2% | +188% | +13.8% | +11.1% |
Risk and diversification
How ADSK has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ADSK's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ADSK's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of ADSK's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ADSK fell 66.0% from August 1995 to October 1999, while the S&P 500 rose 148%.
- The slowest recovery came after ADSK fell 76.9% from December 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until January 2014, five years later.
Green means ADSK fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ADSK fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −76.9% | −53.4% | Dec 2007 | Mar 2009 | 15 months | Jan 2014 | 4.8 years |
| No named crash | −66.0% | +148% | Aug 1995 | Oct 1999 | 4.2 years | Mar 2000 | 5 months |
| Dot-com bust | −63.6% | +1.9% | Mar 2000 | Jul 2000 | 4 months | Feb 2004 | 3.6 years |
| No named crash | −61.2% | — | Jun 1991 | Feb 1992 | 8 months | Mar 1994 | 2.1 years |
| No named crash | −60.4% | — | Oct 1987 | Oct 1987 | Under a month | Feb 1989 | 16 months |
How did ADSK do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ADSK, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- ADSK fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when ADSK fell 34.7% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, BSY held up best, falling less than ADSK in all two crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ADSK.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK This pageAutodesk, Inc. | — | −5.1% | −40.9% | −35.5% | −24.2% | −6.9% | −34.7% | −36.9% | −1.6% | −76.9% | −63.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 6 of 10 | −4.3% | −20.4% | −45.3% | −27.8% | −4.9% | −24.9% | −33.9% | −3.0% | −66.1% | −94.5% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −7.2% | −39.9% | −28.8% | −20.6% | −8.5% | −47.6% | — | — | — | — |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −4.2% | −26.5% | −54.1% | −30.4% | −21.1% | −40.5% | −16.4% | −2.5% | −54.1% | −84.7% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 8 of 10 | −1.0% | −51.8% | −24.5% | −9.5% | −6.0% | −20.2% | −12.0% | −2.3% | −61.5% | −53.0% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 2 of 10 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| J Jacobs Solutions Inc. | 5 of 10 | −4.9% | −26.3% | −39.3% | −31.7% | −7.3% | −22.0% | −26.6% | −4.3% | −74.1% | −38.3% |
| SAP SAP SE | 5 of 10 | −2.0% | −41.9% | −32.6% | −25.0% | −6.9% | −13.3% | −25.0% | −1.4% | −49.6% | −87.9% |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | 8 of 10 | −3.7% | −29.3% | −34.3% | −20.3% | −8.4% | −22.8% | −13.7% | −1.9% | −49.1% | −48.0% |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −1.8% | −24.3% | −32.1% | −14.1% | −10.4% | −19.3% | −21.4% | −4.6% | −88.2% | −72.3% |
| TT Trane Technologies plc | 6 of 10 | −3.3% | −37.5% | −39.2% | −17.9% | −8.0% | −20.6% | −34.2% | −2.6% | −77.5% | −44.7% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 6 of 10 | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −5.3% | −42.7% | −35.7% | −24.8% | −6.1% | −34.2% | −26.9% | −4.2% | −70.5% | — |
| U Unity Software Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.6% | −76.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TRMB Trimble Inc. | 4 of 10 | −6.7% | −38.9% | −53.8% | −30.9% | −12.0% | −20.4% | −16.7% | −2.4% | −71.9% | −87.2% |
| ACM Aecom | 3 of 9 | −6.1% | −22.9% | −54.1% | −27.1% | −9.2% | −27.9% | −36.5% | −5.7% | −58.6% | — |
| ACN Accenture plc | 7 of 9 | −4.7% | −37.3% | −33.5% | −22.6% | −4.1% | −14.9% | −22.7% | −1.9% | −35.7% | — |
| PCOR Procore Technologies, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −9.7% | −47.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −5.2% | −41.7% | −22.5% | −29.3% | −4.6% | −27.1% | −14.5% | −3.5% | −35.9% | −86.0% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | 2 of 2 | −4.3% | −39.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 6 of 10 | −6.2% | −50.3% | −25.6% | −25.5% | −5.4% | −22.7% | −23.6% | −0.2% | −66.7% | −79.9% |
How closely does ADSK move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ADSK with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 14 of the 17 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ADSK's 0.73, led by NVDA, TT and CDNS.
- TT took just 69% of the S&P 500's losses, against 179% for ADSK, while still keeping 115% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, ADSK captured 130% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 179% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.34. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ADSK's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK This pageAutodesk, Inc. | 130% | 179% | 0.73 | 1.34 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| TT Trane Technologies plc | 115% | 69% | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 132% | 83% | 1.58 | 1.09 |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 68% | 45% | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 114% | 79% | 1.45 | 0.97 |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | 124% | 108% | 1.16 | 1.17 |
| J Jacobs Solutions Inc. | 82% | 78% | 1.05 | 0.79 |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 105% | 127% | 0.83 | 1.12 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 131% | 159% | 0.82 | 1.30 |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 115% | 143% | 0.80 | 1.16 |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 129% | 166% | 0.78 | 1.44 |
| TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | 65% | 87% | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| SAP SAP SE | 112% | 152% | 0.74 | 1.10 |
| ACM Aecom | 82% | 111% | 0.74 | 1.24 |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 123% | 184% | 0.67 | 1.24 |
| TRMB Trimble Inc. | 121% | 187% | 0.65 | 1.46 |
| ACN Accenture plc | 117% | 186% | 0.63 | 1.12 |
What diversifies ADSK?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ADSK's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ADSK with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ADSK into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-6.0% for ADSK alone, -0.5% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ADSK over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.40 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, CLS and FIX have moved largely independently of ADSK over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.25 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ADSK lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ADSK and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2021 | 2011 | 2008 | 2006 | 2002 | 2000 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −17.8% | 0.07 | −33.5% | −7.9% | −20.6% | −60.5% | −5.8% | −22.5% | −19.5% | −20.3% | 34.7% | −6.0% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.34 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | +17.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.5% | −1.0% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.26 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +18.0% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 28.5% | +0.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.40 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | +23.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29.1% | −1.3% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.42 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | +19.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29.1% | −1.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.24 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | +42.1% | +6.8% | −44.7% | −6.7% | −47.0% | — | — | 30.3% | +2.9% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.44 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | +19.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.8% | −1.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.12 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −4.2% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +22.6% | — | — | — | 28.4% | −0.5% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.38 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | +22.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29.6% | −0.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2021 | 2011 | 2008 | 2006 | 2002 | 2000 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −17.8% | 0.07 | −33.5% | −7.9% | −20.6% | −60.5% | −5.8% | −22.5% | −19.5% | −20.3% | 34.7% | −6.0% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.13 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −0.4% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −5.8% | −8.3% | +108% | −36.8% | 28.9% | +2.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.25 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | +37.9% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −26.0% | −65.1% | −2.3% | +350% | 32.7% | +13.6% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.20 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +89.0% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +38.9% | −9.4% | −71.1% | −58.7% | 30.9% | +10.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.18 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +44.2% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −1.2% | −27.2% | +61.2% | −71.3% | 29.1% | +2.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.34 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | +61.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.6% | +4.3% |
Common questions
What was ADSK's worst drawdown?
ADSK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 76.9%, from December 2007 to March 2009. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were ADSK's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, ADSK's best year was 2004, when it returned 210%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -60.5%.
Is there a better investment than ADSK?
Among ADSK's popular alternatives, J, SAP and TT earned more than ADSK with less volatility over the past 5 years. J returned 5.3% a year at 26.2% volatility, against a loss of 3.8% a year at 36.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSFT (software) and ADI (semiconductors) earned more than ADSK with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 3.8% a year at 36.4%.
Is ADSK more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ADSK's volatility over the past 5 years was 36.4%, 2.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ADSK's return lands within 36.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ADSK's Sharpe ratio?
ADSK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.07, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ADSK earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ADSK with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ADSK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ADSK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ADSK holding.
What are the best alternatives to ADSK?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, eight outperformed ADSK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: PTC, NOW and MANH.
Did ADSK outperform the S&P 500?
ADSK finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 16 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +0.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ADSK do in stock market crashes?
ADSK fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when ADSK fell 34.7% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies ADSK?
These had a low correlation with ADSK over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.34), DXJ (correlation 0.26) and EMLP (correlation 0.40); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.13), CLS (correlation 0.25) and FIX (correlation 0.20). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ADSK's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ADSK's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to ADSK
NOWServiceNow
NEMNewmont
NVDANVIDIA
SAPSAP
SNPSSynopsys
CDNSCadence Design Systems
TTTrane Technologies
ORCLOracle
CRMSalesforce
ACNAccenture
ADBEAdobe