Relative Intelligence · Enterprise Software

How SAP compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SAP alone. It places SAP (SAP SE) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SAP stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: SAP's full trading record, from September 1995 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowSAP has run far ahead of the market, rising 44.6% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Even so, the slide is SAP's own: it is 25.7% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?More than an industry move: SAP rose 44.6% over the past 3 months, against 15.0% for the enterprise software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF). The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. SAP rose 9.4% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, SAP fell 16.6% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (81.3% against 89.3%). Even so, SAP lagged its enterprise software peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termSAP turned $10,000 into $30,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, SAP has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, SAP fell 41.9%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than MSFT (Microsoft, 31.0%) but less than ADBE (Adobe, 50.3%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationSAP is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.57 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.56 with the total US market, more closely than 86% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- IBM (International Business Machines) earned more for the risk it took than SAP over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 41.1%, against 52.5% for SAP.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF, cybersecurity) and V (Visa, payment processing) earned more than SAP with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 11.5% a year at 30.0%.
- Whole market
- 305 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SAP with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in SAP have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SAP over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SAP over the same span and SAP's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in SAP at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $136,626 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SAP, and INTU finished highest, at $591,451.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 426 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SAP; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- INTU$591,451+5,815% total · +15.1% a year
- MSFT$508,386+4,984% total · +14.5% a year
- ORCL$284,972+2,750% total · +12.2% a year
- ADP$235,442+2,254% total · +11.5% a year
- PAYX$208,673+1,987% total · +11.0% a year
- OTEX$172,469+1,625% total · +10.3% a year
- SAP$136,626+1,266% total · +9.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- IBM$86,041+760% total · +7.7% a year
- PEGA$48,258+383% total · +5.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,249 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SAP; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- FTNT$30,603+206% total · +25.1% a year
- IYW$26,551+166% total · +21.6% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- CIBR$21,643+116% total · +16.7% a year
- IBM$20,049+100% total · +14.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- SAP$16,715+67.2% total · +10.8% a year
- MANH$12,984+29.8% total · +5.4% a year
- PAYC$4,511−54.9% total · −14.7% a year
SAP at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- SAP is still 25.7% below its all-time high.
- SAP's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 87.9%, from March 2000 to October 2002. It took about ten years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, SAP's best was 1997, when it returned 138%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 38.7%. It lost money in ten of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $267B
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Price history from
- September 1995
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −16.6%total return
- Past 3 years
- +81.3%+21.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +72.6%+11.5% a year
- Past 10 years
- +205%+11.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +138%1997
- Worst calendar year
- −38.7%2002
- Losing years
- 10 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 30.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.52return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −87.9%Mar 2000 to Oct 2002
- From its all-time high
- −25.7%below the peak
SAP against the whole market
Where SAP ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does SAP rank among all stocks?
This section ranks SAP on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how SAP stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- SAP is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 25% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
- SAP's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 22% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | SAP | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −16.6% | 2,549 of 3,287 | bottom 23% |
| 3-year return | +81.3% | 1,117 of 3,017 | top 37% |
| 5-year return | +72.6% | 879 of 2,893 | top 30% |
| 10-year return | +205% | 843 of 2,202 | top 38% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 30.0% | 720 of 2,893 | top 25% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.52 | 887 of 2,893 | top 31% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −52.5% | 554 of 2,187 | top 25% |
What has beaten SAP on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). SAP sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than SAP with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 142 stocks and 163 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SAP over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 8% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half SAP's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 18% less than SAP's 30.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.52 for SAP.
- None of SAP's popular alternatives made it, but IYW (cloud computing theme) did: 19.0% a year at 26.6% volatility, 11% less than SAP's 30.0%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to SAP; faint dots are 92 more of the 305 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than SAP?
Investments that beat SAP over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among SAP's popular alternatives, IBM earned more for the risk it took than SAP over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 41.1%, against 52.5% for SAP.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIBR (cybersecurity) and V (payment processing) earned more than SAP with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 11.5% a year at 30.0%.
- Across the whole market, 305 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SAP with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, VOO and BRK-B.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat SAP over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks SAP's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than SAP follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than SAP's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× SAP's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than SAP's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with SAP?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.57 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against SAP. 1 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +151% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Enterprise Software and Software and the categories next to it (Application Software, IT Services, Cybersecurity, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus SAP's specific themes. 15 of 134 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.44 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.63 | — | ||
IYWiShares U.S. Technology ETF · Technology Equity · Cloud Computing theme | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.0% | 26.6% | 0.79 | −39.4% | +805% | 0.46 | 0.37% | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,626% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.20 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.60 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 683 of 3,479 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.25 | — | ||
NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.37 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.30 | 0.40% | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.06 | — | |
CNXNPC Connection, Inc. · Technology Distributors | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.8% | 29.2% | 0.65 | −41.8% | +277% | 0.24 | — | |
SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.49 | 0.20% | |
What these numbers mean for SAP
- Annual return
- SAP returned 11.5% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $17,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- SAP's volatility over the past 5 years was 30.0%, 1.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SAP's return lands within 30.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- SAP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.52, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SAP earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- SAP's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 52.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 52.5% fall takes a 110% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, SAP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.57 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SAP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SAP holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 305 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than SAP with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with SAP | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.11 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.29 | — | |
| 3 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.37 | — |
| 4 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.30 | 0.40% | |
| 5 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.06 | — |
| 6 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.44 | 0.58% |
| 7 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.27 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.17 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.39 | — | |
| 10 | OEFiShares S&P 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.8% | 0.84 | −31.4% | +367% | 0.59 | 0.20% |
| 11 | RCBCRiver City Bank · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.6% | 27.2% | 0.64 | −45.5% | +345% | 0.17 | — |
| 12 | IWYiShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF · US Large-Cap Growth | Whole market | +12.9% | 21.9% | 0.67 | −32.7% | +466% | 0.53 | 0.20% |
| 13 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.21 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.39 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.47 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.03 | — | |
| 17 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.37 | 0.48% |
| 18 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.41 | 0.40% |
| 19 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.29 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.30 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.26 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.29 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.20 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.19 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.27 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.28 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.29 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.23 | — | |
| 29 | BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | -0.05 | — |
| 30 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.29 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.48 | 0.09% | |
| 32 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.20 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.24 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.27 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.30 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.40 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.32 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.38 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.22 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.33 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.22 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.49 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.12 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.11 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +17.9% | 26.1% | 0.76 | −37.9% | +314% | 0.31 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.27 | — | |
| 47 | SEICSEI Investments Company · Asset Management | Whole market | +12.7% | 22.3% | 0.65 | −51.8% | +168% | 0.51 | — |
| 48 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.31 | — | |
| 49 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.45 | — |
| 50 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.28 | — | |
| 51 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.05 | 0.80% |
| 52 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +157% | 0.49 | 0.31% |
| 53 | FNDXSchwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.9% | 0.93 | −37.7% | +291% | 0.50 | 0.25% |
| 54 | Whole market | +14.0% | 25.7% | 0.64 | −45.5% | +79.7% | 0.29 | — | |
| 55 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.27 | — |
| 56 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.14 | — |
| 57 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.50 | 0.25% |
| 58 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.39 | 0.13% |
| 59 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.23 | — |
| 60 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.37 | 0.08% |
| 61 | Same or nearby category | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.63 | — | |
| 62 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.49 | 0.36% |
| 63 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.08 | — |
| 64 | PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Whole market | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +294% | 0.22 | — |
| 65 | MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +12.6% | 13.4% | 0.95 | −35.4% | +244% | 0.45 | 0.05% |
| 66 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.13 | — |
| 67 | RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | +215% | 0.15 | — |
| 68 | SNASnap-on Incorporated · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +12.9% | 23.6% | 0.63 | −47.4% | +195% | 0.22 | — |
| 69 | PAVEGlobal X - U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · Infrastructure Equity | Whole market | +14.9% | 21.6% | 0.75 | −44.1% | — | 0.32 | 0.47% |
| 70 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.53 | 0.15% |
| 71 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.55 | 0.35% |
| 72 | HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +12.6% | 25.8% | 0.59 | −38.7% | +373% | 0.46 | 0.60% |
| 73 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.59 | 0.40% |
| 74 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.8% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +340% | 0.53 | — |
| 75 | PNWPinnacle West Capital Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +13.4% | 19.9% | 0.73 | −39.3% | +103% | 0.08 | — |
| 76 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.37 | 0.43% |
| 77 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.61 | 0.12% |
| 78 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.37 | 0.15% |
| 79 | LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +14.1% | 27.5% | 0.62 | −38.9% | +389% | 0.35 | — |
| 80 | AIZAssurant, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −44.6% | +312% | 0.12 | — |
| 81 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.08 | — |
| 82 | WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +15.3% | 28.4% | 0.65 | −44.1% | +539% | 0.23 | — |
| 83 | PPAInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETF · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 18.9% | 0.90 | −43.9% | +344% | 0.35 | 0.58% |
| 84 | AIRRFirst Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF · US Industrials | Whole market | +18.3% | 25.9% | 0.78 | −42.4% | +407% | 0.16 | 0.69% |
| 85 | AIQGlobal X - Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF · Artificial Intelligence | Whole market | +14.8% | 26.7% | 0.65 | −44.6% | — | 0.48 | 0.68% |
| 86 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.21 | — |
| 87 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.12 | — |
| 88 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.26 | 0.95% |
| 89 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.27 | 0.19% |
| 90 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.31 | 0.40% |
| 91 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.46 | 0.40% |
| 92 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.30 | 0.61% |
| 93 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.42 | 0.60% |
| 94 | WTMWhite Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +15.4% | 23.6% | 0.73 | −40.2% | +169% | 0.12 | — |
| 95 | TSPAT. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.1% | 17.1% | 0.81 | −24.7% | — | 0.56 | 0.34% |
| 96 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.54 | 0.50% |
| 97 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.25 | — | |
| 98 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.52 | 0.20% |
| 99 | XARState Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.0% | 24.1% | 0.63 | −46.4% | +320% | 0.31 | 0.35% |
| 100 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.58 | 0.25% |
SAP against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against SAP, compared period by period and year by year.
How do SAP's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at SAP, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only MSFT was both more rewarding and calmer than SAP over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- 15 of the 20 popular alternatives earned less than SAP over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, SAP returned 11.5% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (30.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than SAP with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | +16.6% | 30.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| SAP This pageSAP SE | +11.5% | 30.0% |
| APPF AppFolio Inc. | +11.3% | 44.2% |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | +9.0% | 22.9% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | +6.5% | 40.2% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | +1.9% | 45.5% |
| PAYX Paychex, Inc. | +1.5% | 25.0% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | −3.2% | 39.4% |
| ACN Accenture plc | −5.2% | 32.7% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | −5.9% | 41.7% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | −7.5% | 37.1% |
| OTEX Open Text Corporation | −9.2% | 32.6% |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | −9.4% | 39.1% |
| INFY Infosys Limited | −9.6% | 29.8% |
| PCTY Paylocity Holding Corporation | −10.1% | 41.1% |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | −10.9% | 53.0% |
| PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. | −12.1% | 46.3% |
| WIT Wipro Limited | −14.8% | 33.2% |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | −16.5% | 38.1% |
Has SAP consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares SAP with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than SAP helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives outperformed SAP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was MSFT.
- IBM and MSFT earned more for the risk they took than SAP (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than SAP over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| SAP SAP SE (this page) | — | +9.4% | +44.6% | +29.6% | −2.1% | −16.6% | +81.3% | +72.6% | +205% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | — | $267B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 2/5 short2/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| IBM Information Technology ServicesInternational Business Machines Corporation | 1/5 short2/3 long | +4.3% | +14.4% | −3.3% | −15.3% | −12.5% | +93.5% | +116% | +151% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | — | $228B | — |
| PAYC Software - ApplicationPaycom Software, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +15.9% | +75.5% | +98.1% | +73.3% | +31.7% | +3.8% | −47.4% | +453% | 46.3% | -0.04 | −79.0% | — | $12B | — |
| MANH Software - ApplicationManhattan Associates, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +11.2% | +40.7% | +74.0% | +39.2% | +16.4% | +22.3% | +37.1% | +344% | 40.2% | 0.36 | −61.0% | — | $14B | — |
| PCTY Software - ApplicationPaylocity Holding Corporation | 4/5 short1/3 long | +17.8% | +33.6% | +64.9% | +16.7% | +12.1% | −10.2% | −41.4% | +288% | 41.1% | -0.06 | −68.9% | — | $9.0B | — |
| ADP Software - ApplicationAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +8.5% | +15.4% | +46.7% | +18.4% | +6.4% | +30.2% | +53.6% | +320% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | — | $116B | — |
| APPF Software - ApplicationAppFolio Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +6.6% | +24.9% | +41.0% | −2.9% | −6.9% | +25.6% | +70.6% | +1,072% | 44.2% | 0.46 | −55.4% | — | $7.9B | — |
| NOW Software - ApplicationServiceNow, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +8.6% | +42.8% | +50.0% | +1.4% | −18.5% | +37.8% | +9.8% | +848% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | — | $155B | — |
| CRM Software - ApplicationSalesforce, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +2.5% | +39.7% | +30.7% | −3.8% | −3.9% | +21.3% | −14.8% | +240% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | — | $200B | — |
| INTU Software - ApplicationIntuit Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +10.8% | +14.6% | −16.4% | −46.0% | −48.9% | −32.1% | −38.8% | +237% | 39.1% | -0.06 | −68.2% | — | $90B | — |
| ORCL Software - InfrastructureOracle Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | +300% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| PEGA Software - ApplicationPegasystems Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +3.7% | +14.7% | −16.9% | −35.0% | −33.5% | +85.1% | −43.7% | +140% | 53.0% | 0.04 | −79.2% | — | $6.0B | — |
| ACN Information Technology ServicesAccenture plc | 3/5 short0/3 long | +29.5% | +66.5% | +25.1% | −4.8% | +2.2% | −13.6% | −23.6% | +146% | 32.7% | 0.00 | −67.8% | — | $146B | — |
| WDAY Software - ApplicationWorkday, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +6.3% | +38.6% | +59.4% | −0.9% | −15.4% | −3.4% | −26.4% | +132% | 41.7% | 0.06 | −63.4% | — | $49B | — |
| PAYX Staffing & Employment ServicesPaychex, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −2.1% | −1.2% | +23.8% | +7.2% | −7.1% | +7.5% | +7.9% | +173% | 25.0% | 0.19 | −45.0% | — | $40B | — |
| BSY Software - ApplicationBentley Systems, Incorporated | 2/5 short0/3 long | +19.6% | +18.1% | +8.8% | +0.6% | −25.6% | −22.4% | −32.4% | — | 37.1% | -0.03 | −61.0% | — | $11B | — |
| INFY Information Technology ServicesInfosys Limited | 1/5 short0/3 long | +16.3% | +11.9% | −9.0% | −28.7% | −22.4% | −18.0% | −39.8% | +110% | 29.8% | -0.19 | −54.4% | — | $52B | — |
| WIT Information Technology ServicesWipro Limited | 1/5 short0/3 long | +22.8% | +12.0% | −3.3% | −29.1% | −21.5% | −6.4% | −55.1% | +19.9% | 33.2% | -0.32 | −65.4% | — | $20B | — |
| OTEX Software - ApplicationOpen Text Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +14.8% | +14.9% | +16.1% | −13.6% | −29.4% | −11.2% | −38.4% | +4.7% | 32.6% | -0.13 | −57.8% | — | $6.4B | — |
| ADBE Software - ApplicationAdobe Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +2.9% | +9.4% | +3.3% | −23.0% | −25.2% | −52.5% | −59.4% | +135% | 38.1% | -0.28 | −71.9% | — | $100B | — |
How did SAP do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where SAP ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with SAP and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- SAP finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 15 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, APPF came out ahead of SAP most often, in seven of the ten years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SAP finished in the top quarter in four of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in six. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 21.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of SAP; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places SAP among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of SAP | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP This pageSAP SE | — | −0.4% | +61.3% | +52.3% | −24.2% | +9.2% | −1.3% | +36.4% | −10.0% | +31.7% | +11.1% | +15.3% | −18.6% | +10.0% | +55.8% | +6.0% | +9.8% | +31.4% | −28.0% | −2.6% | +18.7% | +2.8% | +7.0% | +114% | −38.7% | −4.9% | −35.1% | +45.1% | +38.0% | +138% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 29 | 7 of 21 | 2 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 17 of 21 | 20 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 11 of 19 | 17 of 17 | 16 of 17 | 2 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 11 of 15 | 11 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 12 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 7 of 14 | 1 of 14 | 14 of 14 | 6 of 13 | 9 of 12 | 6 of 11 | 7 of 10 | 1 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 14 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 18 of 29 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% | +60.5% | −44.4% | +20.8% | +15.8% | −1.0% | +9.2% | +6.2% | −22.0% | +52.8% | −62.9% | +68.4% | +115% | +56.5% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 15 of 29 | +38.2% | +39.3% | +21.9% | +10.6% | +16.6% | −1.2% | +23.6% | −22.6% | −4.9% | +25.2% | −11.4% | −12.4% | −0.2% | +5.9% | +27.4% | +14.2% | +58.7% | −20.8% | +12.8% | +19.8% | −15.8% | +7.2% | +20.5% | −35.4% | +43.1% | −20.8% | +17.6% | +77.5% | +39.3% |
| PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. | 6 of 11 | −21.7% | 0.0% | −33.1% | −25.3% | −8.2% | +70.8% | +116% | +52.4% | +76.6% | +20.9% | +42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 14 of 27 | −35.9% | +25.5% | +77.4% | −21.9% | +47.8% | +31.9% | +88.2% | −14.5% | −6.6% | −19.9% | +62.5% | +38.6% | +94.6% | +49.1% | +32.5% | +27.1% | +52.1% | −40.1% | −12.4% | +46.9% | −14.2% | −13.6% | +16.7% | −18.8% | −31.6% | +479% | −73.0% | — | — |
| PCTY Paylocity Holding Corporation | 7 of 11 | −23.5% | +21.0% | −15.1% | −17.7% | +14.7% | +70.4% | +101% | +27.7% | +57.1% | −26.0% | +55.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 15 of 29 | −10.2% | +28.4% | −0.3% | −1.3% | +42.6% | +5.9% | +32.7% | +14.3% | +16.5% | +24.3% | +4.1% | +20.5% | +45.6% | +8.5% | +20.2% | +11.7% | +12.7% | −9.0% | +2.8% | +9.1% | +5.1% | +13.5% | +2.4% | −32.7% | −6.4% | +18.3% | +35.3% | +31.7% | +44.6% |
| APPF AppFolio Inc. | 7 of 10 | −5.7% | +42.4% | +64.4% | −13.0% | −32.8% | +63.7% | +85.7% | +42.7% | +74.0% | +63.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 9 of 13 | −27.8% | +50.0% | +82.0% | −40.2% | +17.9% | +95.0% | +58.6% | +36.5% | +75.4% | −14.1% | +27.6% | +21.2% | +86.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 13 of 21 | −20.2% | +27.8% | +98.5% | −47.8% | +14.2% | +36.8% | +18.7% | +34.0% | +49.3% | −12.7% | +32.2% | +7.5% | +31.3% | +65.8% | −23.2% | +79.0% | +130% | −49.0% | +72.0% | +13.7% | +88.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 18 of 29 | +6.1% | +1.2% | +61.8% | −39.1% | +70.3% | +46.1% | +34.1% | +25.9% | +39.2% | +20.2% | +5.9% | +22.1% | +29.7% | +14.3% | +7.0% | +60.4% | +29.2% | −24.7% | +3.6% | +14.5% | +21.1% | −16.7% | +12.6% | +9.7% | +8.5% | −34.2% | +148% | +75.8% | +30.9% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 16 of 29 | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% | +24.3% | +19.4% | −3.0% | +24.9% | +6.9% | −17.6% | +19.0% | +15.7% | +31.8% | −17.5% | +28.6% | +39.4% | −21.4% | +31.7% | +40.4% | −11.0% | +3.6% | +22.6% | −21.8% | −52.5% | +3.7% | +290% | +93.5% | −19.9% |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | 16 of 29 | +28.4% | +91.0% | +43.1% | −69.3% | −16.0% | +67.5% | +66.8% | +1.8% | +31.6% | +31.5% | +33.0% | −15.1% | +118% | −22.5% | −19.5% | +8.2% | +177% | +4.3% | +22.9% | +36.8% | −14.0% | −1.5% | +69.0% | +17.3% | +87.9% | −79.5% | +171% | −79.4% | −32.9% |
| ACN Accenture plc | 16 of 24 | −22.1% | +1.9% | +33.6% | −34.8% | +60.7% | +26.0% | +51.2% | −6.2% | +33.3% | +14.3% | +20.8% | +11.4% | +26.6% | +27.7% | +12.0% | +19.1% | +29.0% | −7.5% | −1.4% | +29.3% | +8.3% | +2.6% | +46.3% | −33.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 7 of 13 | −16.8% | −6.5% | +65.0% | −38.8% | +14.0% | +45.7% | +3.0% | +57.0% | +53.9% | −17.1% | −2.4% | −1.9% | +52.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAYX Paychex, Inc. | 13 of 29 | −17.5% | +21.3% | +6.2% | −13.2% | +50.1% | +13.3% | +34.5% | −1.1% | +15.4% | +18.9% | +18.4% | +5.0% | +48.9% | +9.7% | +1.4% | +5.3% | +22.1% | −24.6% | −6.0% | +5.7% | +13.7% | −7.1% | +35.3% | −18.8% | −27.6% | +83.5% | +17.6% | +53.4% | +48.7% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | 2 of 5 | −17.8% | −10.1% | +41.8% | −23.3% | +19.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| INFY Infosys Limited | 11 of 26 | −16.4% | +23.1% | +4.8% | −27.3% | +51.9% | +68.3% | +11.8% | +21.8% | +12.3% | −9.6% | +9.0% | +13.6% | +36.3% | −15.8% | −31.7% | +40.4% | +128% | −45.0% | −16.2% | +36.9% | +17.2% | +47.6% | +38.1% | +11.7% | −31.8% | −44.3% | — | — | — |
| WIT Wipro Limited | 11 of 25 | −16.6% | +27.7% | +20.0% | −51.9% | +73.1% | +50.9% | −1.7% | −5.8% | +13.2% | −15.2% | +3.7% | −9.5% | +68.0% | −3.9% | −26.1% | +23.9% | +195% | −40.5% | +2.9% | +49.3% | +2.8% | +77.0% | +45.3% | −7.7% | −27.0% | — | — | — | — |
| OTEX Open Text Corporation | 16 of 29 | +19.2% | −30.4% | +45.4% | −35.9% | +6.3% | +4.9% | +37.5% | −7.1% | +17.2% | +30.9% | −16.3% | +28.4% | +66.5% | +9.2% | +11.1% | +13.3% | +35.1% | −4.3% | +54.6% | +44.1% | −29.7% | +4.8% | +66.8% | −22.5% | +40.8% | +16.7% | −26.0% | +81.6% | +95.1% |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 16 of 29 | −21.3% | −25.5% | +77.3% | −40.6% | +13.4% | +51.6% | +45.8% | +29.1% | +70.2% | +9.6% | +29.2% | +21.4% | +58.9% | +33.3% | −8.2% | −16.3% | +72.8% | −50.2% | +3.9% | +11.3% | +17.9% | +60.7% | +57.9% | −20.0% | −46.6% | +73.2% | +188% | +13.8% | +11.1% |
Risk and diversification
How SAP has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were SAP's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents SAP's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1995, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of SAP's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: SAP fell 61.3% from July 1998 to March 1999, while the S&P 500 rose 13.9%.
- The slowest recovery came after SAP fell 87.9% from March 2000 to October 2002; it did not regain that peak until November 2012, ten years later.
Green means SAP fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | SAP fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −87.9% | −41.6% | Mar 2000 | Oct 2002 | 2.6 years | Nov 2012 | 10.1 years |
| No named crash | −61.3% | +13.9% | Jul 1998 | Mar 1999 | 8 months | Jan 2000 | 10 months |
| No named crash | −52.5% | +19.6% | Jul 2025 | Jul 2026 | 12 months | Not yet | — |
| 2022 bear market | −51.0% | +5.0% | Sep 2020 | Sep 2022 | 2 years | Nov 2023 | 14 months |
| Covid crash | −32.9% | −18.7% | Jul 2019 | Mar 2020 | 8 months | Jun 2020 | 3 months |
How did SAP do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far SAP, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, ADP held up best, falling less than SAP in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- SAP fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when SAP fell 87.9% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than SAP.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP This pageSAP SE | — | −2.0% | −41.9% | −32.6% | −25.0% | −6.9% | −13.3% | −25.0% | −1.4% | −49.6% | −87.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 5 of 10 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 5 of 10 | −2.0% | −16.7% | −37.3% | −29.1% | −6.3% | −23.3% | −14.6% | −1.5% | −44.3% | −58.3% |
| PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −5.4% | −33.7% | −44.9% | −29.9% | −6.4% | −50.8% | — | — | — | — |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −4.2% | −26.5% | −54.1% | −30.4% | −21.1% | −40.5% | −16.4% | −2.5% | −54.1% | −84.7% |
| PCTY Paylocity Holding Corporation | 1 of 6 | −6.3% | −30.6% | −47.6% | −33.1% | −13.0% | −45.6% | — | — | — | — |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −3.3% | −19.9% | −39.5% | −19.2% | −8.7% | −14.1% | −15.8% | 0.0% | −35.7% | −53.6% |
| APPF AppFolio Inc. | 2 of 6 | −8.7% | −34.2% | −41.3% | −34.0% | −4.5% | −35.1% | — | — | — | — |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −7.2% | −39.9% | −28.8% | −20.6% | −8.5% | −47.6% | — | — | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −5.3% | −42.7% | −35.7% | −24.8% | −6.1% | −34.2% | −26.9% | −4.2% | −70.5% | — |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 4 of 10 | −6.0% | −42.7% | −36.3% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −24.8% | −18.0% | −3.4% | −38.3% | −66.0% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 6 of 10 | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | 2 of 10 | −6.6% | −72.2% | −38.3% | −30.3% | −7.7% | −31.1% | −35.7% | −0.8% | −32.6% | −91.7% |
| ACN Accenture plc | 5 of 9 | −4.7% | −37.3% | −33.5% | −22.6% | −4.1% | −14.9% | −22.7% | −1.9% | −35.7% | — |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −2.8% | −47.0% | −42.4% | −17.3% | −5.8% | −42.3% | — | — | — | — |
| PAYX Paychex, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −4.3% | −22.6% | −44.1% | −17.4% | −7.1% | −14.8% | −14.6% | −1.0% | −49.5% | −64.9% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | 1 of 2 | −4.3% | −39.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| INFY Infosys Limited | 4 of 10 | −4.9% | −35.9% | −39.1% | −12.7% | −3.6% | −17.3% | −25.9% | −0.6% | −60.9% | −90.0% |
| WIT Wipro Limited | 1 of 9 | −2.6% | −52.6% | −33.0% | −8.6% | −6.8% | −14.6% | −29.6% | −1.5% | −66.0% | — |
| OTEX Open Text Corporation | 5 of 10 | −2.5% | −45.8% | −38.2% | −18.0% | −6.0% | −13.3% | −29.9% | 0.0% | −40.8% | −67.8% |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 5 of 10 | −6.2% | −50.3% | −25.6% | −25.5% | −5.4% | −22.7% | −23.6% | −0.2% | −66.7% | −79.9% |
How closely does SAP move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares SAP with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 12 of the 19 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SAP's 0.74, led by NOW, MSFT and APPF.
- NOW took just 79% of the S&P 500's losses, against 152% for SAP, while still keeping 114% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, SAP captured 112% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 152% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.10. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than SAP's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP This pageSAP SE | 112% | 152% | 0.74 | 1.10 |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 114% | 79% | 1.45 | 0.97 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| APPF AppFolio Inc. | 137% | 108% | 1.27 | 0.97 |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 89% | 88% | 1.01 | 0.79 |
| PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. | 110% | 114% | 0.97 | 1.12 |
| PCTY Paylocity Holding Corporation | 94% | 106% | 0.89 | 0.88 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 131% | 159% | 0.82 | 1.30 |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 115% | 143% | 0.80 | 1.16 |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 99% | 126% | 0.79 | 1.03 |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 129% | 166% | 0.78 | 1.44 |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | 87% | 113% | 0.77 | 1.05 |
| PAYX Paychex, Inc. | 87% | 114% | 0.77 | 0.89 |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 89% | 121% | 0.73 | 0.95 |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 96% | 139% | 0.70 | 1.19 |
| INFY Infosys Limited | 85% | 126% | 0.67 | 0.90 |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 123% | 184% | 0.67 | 1.24 |
| ACN Accenture plc | 117% | 186% | 0.63 | 1.12 |
| WIT Wipro Limited | 62% | 122% | 0.51 | 0.82 |
| OTEX Open Text Corporation | 76% | 157% | 0.49 | 1.00 |
What diversifies SAP?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with SAP's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing SAP with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in SAP into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+10.8% for SAP alone, +12.7% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of SAP over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.41 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in seven of the ten calendar years in which SAP lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which SAP lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% SAP and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2020 | 2018 | 2014 | 2008 | 2007 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SAP SE (this page) | 1.00 | +72.6% | 0.52 | −0.4% | −24.2% | −1.3% | −10.0% | −18.6% | −28.0% | −2.6% | −38.7% | −4.9% | −35.1% | 30.7% | +10.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.41 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | −9.0% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.4% | +12.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.37 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | +3.9% | −19.8% | +8.1% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | 25.6% | +14.6% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.26 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | −13.4% | −8.7% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 25.5% | +12.5% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.37 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | −6.5% | −3.0% | +12.6% | — | — | — | — | — | 25.7% | +11.8% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.47 | +140% | 0.97 | +78.0% | −5.2% | −4.0% | −15.3% | −6.3% | −36.8% | +20.9% | −13.6% | −9.2% | −11.8% | 26.6% | +13.4% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.24 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | +55.5% | −9.1% | +30.2% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 27.1% | +17.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.30 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | +24.8% | −1.9% | −2.2% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | — | — | 25.8% | +13.1% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.39 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | +28.2% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.5% | +13.7% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2020 | 2018 | 2014 | 2008 | 2007 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SAP SE (this page) | 1.00 | +72.6% | 0.52 | −0.4% | −24.2% | −1.3% | −10.0% | −18.6% | −28.0% | −2.6% | −38.7% | −4.9% | −35.1% | 30.7% | +10.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.17 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | +10.1% | −24.5% | +23.0% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 26.0% | +17.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.15 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | −2.4% | −16.3% | +12.9% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 28.8% | +29.6% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.09 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +6.7% | +0.8% | −10.4% | −15.2% | +2.1% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 26.9% | +25.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.20 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | +27.1% | −28.4% | +29.3% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 26.1% | +16.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.19 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | −27.4% | −8.2% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 26.6% | +19.0% |
Common questions
What was SAP's worst drawdown?
SAP's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 87.9%, from March 2000 to October 2002. It took about ten years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were SAP's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, SAP's best year was 1997, when it returned 138%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -38.7%.
Is there a better investment than SAP?
Among SAP's popular alternatives, IBM earned more for the risk it took than SAP over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 41.1%, against 52.5% for SAP. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIBR (cybersecurity) and V (payment processing) earned more than SAP with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 11.5% a year at 30.0%.
Is SAP more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. SAP's volatility over the past 5 years was 30.0%, 1.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SAP's return lands within 30.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is SAP's Sharpe ratio?
SAP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.52, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SAP earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is SAP with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, SAP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.57 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SAP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SAP holding.
What are the best alternatives to SAP?
None of the 20 popular alternatives we compared outperformed SAP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about SAP's strength than about its alternatives.
Did SAP outperform the S&P 500?
SAP finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 15 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -0.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did SAP do in stock market crashes?
SAP fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when SAP fell 87.9% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies SAP?
These had a low correlation with SAP over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.41), DXJ (correlation 0.37) and EMLP (correlation 0.26); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.17), CLS (correlation 0.15) and FIX (correlation 0.09). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than SAP's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of SAP's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.