Relative Intelligence · Application Software

How Intuit (INTU) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on INTU alone. It places INTU (Intuit Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where INTU stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: INTU's full trading record, from March 1993 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowINTU has gone against the market, falling 16.4% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. INTU is 57.8% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?INTU's 14.6% gain over the past 3 months is part of a broader application software rally: the application software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0%, with ORCL (Oracle, up 8.4%) and SAP (up 44.6%). Last month cut against the tape: INTU rose 10.8% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, INTU fell 48.9% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (32.1% against 89.3%). A ahead of 66% of stocks worth at least $300 million over 10 years, but behind 90% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 3 years. By year ↓
- Long termINTU turned $10,000 into $33,700 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, INTU has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, INTU fell 42.7%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than ORCL (Oracle, 31.0%) but less than WDAY (Workday, 47.0%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, INTU has a correlation of 0.44 over 5 years, more closely than 61% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- V (Visa), SAP and ADP (Automatic Data Processing) earned more than INTU with less volatility over the past 5 years. V returned 12.8% a year at 22.9% volatility, against a loss of 9.4% a year at 39.1%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- MSFT (Microsoft, software) and ADI (Analog Devices, semiconductors) earned more than INTU with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 9.4% a year at 39.1%.
- Whole market
- 2,119 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than INTU with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in INTU have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in INTU over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of INTU over the same span and INTU's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in INTU at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $591,451 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of INTU, and AAPL finished highest, at $20,534,853.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 80 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of INTU; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- ORLY$2M+22,426% total · +20.5% a year
- ESLT$2M+16,428% total · +19.3% a year
- RMD$2M+16,400% total · +19.3% a year
- CASY$625,987+6,160% total · +15.3% a year
- INTU$591,451+5,815% total · +15.1% a year
- ADP$235,442+2,254% total · +11.5% a year
- SAP$136,626+1,266% total · +9.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- HRB$104,735+947% total · +8.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 3,213 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of INTU; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- HRB$19,278+92.8% total · +14.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- V$16,755+67.5% total · +10.9% a year
- SAP$16,715+67.2% total · +10.8% a year
- ADP$14,432+44.3% total · +7.6% a year
- SHOP$10,938+9.4% total · +1.8% a year
- CRM$8,626−13.7% total · −2.9% a year
- INTU$5,301−47.0% total · −11.9% a year
- PCTY$5,084−49.2% total · −12.7% a year
- PAYC$4,511−54.9% total · −14.7% a year
INTU at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- INTU is still 57.8% below its all-time high.
- INTU's deepest decline since it began trading in 1993 was 75.3%, from December 1995 to April 1997. It took 21 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, INTU's best was 1999, when it returned 148%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 39.1%. It lost money in four of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $90B
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Price history from
- March 1993
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −48.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- −32.1%−12.1% a year
- Past 5 years
- −38.8%−9.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +237%+12.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +148%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −39.1%2022
- Losing years
- 4 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 39.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- -0.06return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −75.3%Dec 1995 to Apr 1997
- From its all-time high
- −57.8%below the peak
INTU against the whole market
Where INTU ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does INTU rank among all stocks?
This section ranks INTU on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how INTU stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- INTU's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 6% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | INTU | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −48.9% | 3,093 of 3,287 | bottom 7% |
| 3-year return | −32.1% | 2,715 of 3,017 | bottom 11% |
| 5-year return | −38.8% | 2,269 of 2,893 | bottom 23% |
| 10-year return | +237% | 752 of 2,202 | top 34% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 39.1% | 1,402 of 2,893 | top 48% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | -0.06 | 2,461 of 2,893 | bottom 16% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −68.2% | 1,228 of 2,187 | bottom 45% |
What has beaten INTU on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). INTU sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than INTU with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,148 stocks and 971 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than INTU over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 58% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half INTU's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 37% less than INTU's 39.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against -0.06 for INTU. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than INTU (33.4% against 39.1%).
- Among INTU's popular alternatives, HRB, V and SAP are in the region. HRB earned 18.3% a year against a loss of 9.4% a year for INTU, at 34.9% volatility, 11% less than INTU's 39.1%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to INTU; faint dots are 90 more of the 2,119 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than INTU?
Investments that beat INTU over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among INTU's popular alternatives, V, SAP and ADP earned more than INTU with less volatility over the past 5 years. V returned 12.8% a year at 22.9% volatility, against a loss of 9.4% a year at 39.1%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSFT (software) and ADI (semiconductors) earned more than INTU with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 9.4% a year at 39.1%.
- Across the whole market, 2,119 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than INTU with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat INTU over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks INTU's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than INTU follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than INTU's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× INTU's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than INTU's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with INTU?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −9.4% | 39.1% | -0.06 | −68.2% | +237% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.44 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against INTU. 13 of 22 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.37 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.58 | — | ||
HRBH&R Block, Inc. · Tax Preparation | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.3% | 34.9% | 0.65 | −57.7% | +206% | 0.36 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | −3.2% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | +240% | 0.64 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +7.7% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | +300% | 0.44 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Application Software and Software and the categories next to it (Enterprise Software, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus INTU's specific themes. 75 of 117 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | -0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | -0.04 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.44 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.10 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +1,139% | 0.24 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,679 of 3,494 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.15 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.44 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.12 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.16 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.20 | 0.09% | ||
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.24 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | −8.6% | 28.9% | -0.17 | −57.9% | +35.4% | 0.19 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for INTU
- Annual return
- INTU lost 9.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $6,120. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- INTU's volatility over the past 5 years was 39.1%, 2.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, INTU's return lands within 39.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- INTU's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.06, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so INTU earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- INTU's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 68.2%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 68.2% fall takes a 214% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, INTU's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.44 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against INTU instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a INTU holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2,119 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than INTU with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with INTU | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.15 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.02 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.44 | 0.03% | |
| 4 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.12 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.16 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.10 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.08 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.05 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.17 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.20 | 0.09% | |
| 11 | Whole market | +8.7% | 35.7% | 0.41 | −28.7% | +257% | -0.18 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.39 | 0.04% | |
| 13 | Whole market | +2.9% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | +366% | 0.29 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.27 | 0.06% | |
| 15 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.27 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.09 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.18 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.28 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.22 | — | |
| 20 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.01 | — |
| 21 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.20 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +5.4% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | +240% | 0.57 | — | |
| 23 | Same or nearby category | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.63 | — | |
| 24 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.19 | 0.20% |
| 25 | Whole market | +4.4% | 20.9% | 0.31 | −35.8% | +245% | 0.41 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.07 | — | |
| 27 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.15 | — |
| 28 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.22 | — |
| 29 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.32 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +12.5% | 31.3% | 0.53 | −37.1% | +303% | 0.00 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +6.1% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | +270% | 0.26 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +2.6% | 30.6% | 0.24 | −43.2% | +306% | 0.24 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +2.5% | 22.1% | 0.23 | −36.9% | +281% | 0.02 | — | |
| 34 | MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +12.6% | 13.4% | 0.95 | −35.4% | +244% | 0.23 | 0.05% |
| 35 | EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.30 | — |
| 36 | VRSNVeriSign, Inc. · Internet Services | Whole market | +7.8% | 25.9% | 0.42 | −38.9% | +308% | 0.43 | — |
| 37 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.43 | 0.03% | |
| 38 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | -0.01 | 0.59% |
| 39 | MTDMettler-Toledo International Inc. · Life Sciences Tools | Whole market | +2.6% | 32.5% | 0.24 | −43.5% | +298% | 0.28 | — |
| 40 | RMDResMed Inc. · Medical Devices | Whole market | −0.3% | 31.8% | 0.15 | −54.0% | +331% | 0.26 | — |
| 41 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.14 | — |
| 42 | Same or nearby category | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | -0.01 | — | |
| 43 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.44 | 0.40% |
| 44 | XLGInvesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.8% | 18.9% | 0.78 | −30.5% | +379% | 0.47 | 0.20% |
| 45 | Whole market | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 0.45 | — | |
| 46 | BROBrown & Brown, Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +2.6% | 26.0% | 0.23 | −55.8% | +317% | 0.36 | — |
| 47 | Same or nearby category | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | -0.04 | — | |
| 48 | MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.45 | 0.46% |
| 49 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.13 | — | |
| 50 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | -0.03 | — |
| 51 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.39 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.07 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.03 | — | |
| 54 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.35 | 0.50% |
| 55 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.14 | — | |
| 56 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.02 | 0.48% |
| 57 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.15 | 0.40% |
| 58 | CSWCSW Industrials, Inc. · Industrial Products | Whole market | +17.1% | 34.4% | 0.63 | −46.2% | +867% | 0.29 | — |
| 59 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.01 | — | |
| 60 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.38 | 0.69% |
| 61 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.25 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.07 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.32 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.21 | 0.05% | |
| 65 | SUSAiShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.4% | 17.4% | 0.66 | −32.9% | +302% | 0.44 | 0.25% |
| 66 | NICNicolet Bankshares, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 30.1% | 0.73 | −44.3% | +344% | -0.03 | — |
| 67 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.36 | 0.18% | |
| 68 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | -0.02 | — | |
| 69 | EQWLInvesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.0% | 0.81 | −34.3% | +291% | 0.41 | 0.30% |
| 70 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | -0.05 | — | |
| 71 | CHEChemed Corporation · Health Care Services | Whole market | +3.4% | 25.3% | 0.26 | −42.9% | +273% | 0.06 | — |
| 72 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.15 | — | |
| 73 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +40.5% | 0.12 | 0.30% |
| 74 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | -0.01 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.18 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.04 | — | |
| 77 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 22.8% | 0.77 | −32.3% | +286% | 0.25 | — |
| 78 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.09 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +521% | 0.35 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.22 | 0.03% | |
| 81 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +627% | 0.30 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.16 | — | |
| 83 | BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | -0.03 | — |
| 84 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.29 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | -0.11 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.20 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | 0.08 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.03 | 0.40% | |
| 89 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.35 | 0.60% |
| 90 | Whole market | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +151% | 0.09 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +145% | -0.03 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.36 | 0.09% | |
| 93 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.30 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | -0.07 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.27 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | -0.04 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | +234% | 0.24 | — | |
| 98 | PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Technology | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.1% | 0.73 | −28.1% | +305% | 0.15 | 0.65% |
| 99 | Whole market | +4.0% | 26.6% | 0.28 | −49.0% | +282% | 0.40 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | -0.13 | — |
INTU against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against INTU, compared period by period and year by year.
How do INTU's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at INTU, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Five of the 22 popular alternatives, led by HRB, V and SAP, were both more rewarding and calmer than INTU over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, INTU returned -9.4% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (39.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than INTU with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| HRB H&R Block, Inc. | +18.3% | 34.9% |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | +14.3% | 45.5% |
| V Visa Inc. | +12.8% | 22.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| SAP SAP SE | +11.5% | 30.0% |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | +9.0% | 22.9% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | +3.1% | 66.9% |
| PAYX Paychex, Inc. | +1.5% | 25.0% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | −3.2% | 39.4% |
| QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc. | −4.1% | 50.4% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | −5.9% | 41.7% |
| INTU This pageIntuit Inc. | −9.4% | 39.1% |
| PCTY Paylocity Holding Corporation | −10.1% | 41.1% |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | −11.2% | 36.9% |
| WK Workiva Inc. | −11.7% | 46.8% |
| PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. | −12.1% | 46.3% |
| ALKT Alkami Technology, Inc. | −12.7% | 48.9% |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | −19.7% | 33.9% |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | −20.6% | 57.6% |
| NCNO nCino, Inc. | −21.4% | 54.1% |
| BL BlackLine, Inc. | −24.3% | 46.4% |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | −25.9% | 43.3% |
| BILL Bill.com Holdings, Inc. | −30.2% | 69.7% |
Has INTU consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares INTU with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than INTU helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- 12 of the 22 popular alternatives, led by SHOP, ADP and V, outperformed INTU in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- SHOP and ADP outperformed INTU in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- HRB, V and SAP earned more for the risk they took than INTU (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than INTU over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| INTU Intuit Inc. (this page) | — | +10.8% | +14.6% | −16.4% | −46.0% | −48.9% | −32.1% | −38.8% | +237% | 39.1% | -0.06 | −68.2% | — | $90B | — |
| SHOP QualifiedShopify Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +25.8% | +39.4% | +28.4% | +10.4% | +5.3% | +239% | +16.6% | +3,916% | 66.9% | 0.38 | −84.8% | — | $225B | — |
| ADP QualifiedAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +8.5% | +15.4% | +46.7% | +18.4% | +6.4% | +30.2% | +53.6% | +320% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | — | $116B | — |
| V QualifiedVisa Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +9.9% | +13.0% | +30.0% | +18.0% | +19.0% | +78.2% | +82.5% | +429% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | — | $759B | — |
| PAYC QualifiedPaycom Software, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +15.9% | +75.5% | +98.1% | +73.3% | +31.7% | +3.8% | −47.4% | +453% | 46.3% | -0.04 | −79.0% | — | $12B | — |
| PCTY QualifiedPaylocity Holding Corporation | 5/5 short2/3 long | +17.8% | +33.6% | +64.9% | +16.7% | +12.1% | −10.2% | −41.4% | +288% | 41.1% | -0.06 | −68.9% | — | $9.0B | — |
| QTWO QualifiedQ2 Holdings, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +13.9% | +18.7% | +23.8% | −5.0% | +8.7% | +110% | −19.0% | +135% | 50.4% | 0.17 | −85.8% | — | $4.1B | — |
| WK QualifiedWorkiva Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +8.8% | +38.6% | +39.2% | −4.5% | −11.5% | −19.2% | −46.3% | +373% | 46.8% | -0.04 | −72.5% | — | $4.3B | — |
| CRM QualifiedSalesforce, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +2.5% | +39.7% | +30.7% | −3.8% | −3.9% | +21.3% | −14.8% | +240% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | — | $200B | — |
| HRB QualifiedH&R Block, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +8.8% | +17.2% | +55.7% | +17.4% | −1.6% | +23.3% | +132% | +206% | 34.9% | 0.65 | −57.7% | — | $5.9B | — |
| SAP QualifiedSAP SE | 4/5 short2/3 long | +9.4% | +44.6% | +29.6% | −2.1% | −16.6% | +81.3% | +72.6% | +205% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | — | $267B | — |
| WDAY QualifiedWorkday, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +6.3% | +38.6% | +59.4% | −0.9% | −15.4% | −3.4% | −26.4% | +132% | 41.7% | 0.06 | −63.4% | — | $49B | — |
| PAYX QualifiedPaychex, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −2.1% | −1.2% | +23.8% | +7.2% | −7.1% | +7.5% | +7.9% | +173% | 25.0% | 0.19 | −45.0% | — | $40B | — |
| ORCL Software - InfrastructureOracle Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | +300% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| FICO Software - ApplicationFair Isaac Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | −13.5% | −36.7% | −24.8% | −51.3% | −50.6% | −12.3% | +94.8% | +549% | 45.5% | 0.52 | −75.1% | — | $17B | — |
| HUBS Software - ApplicationHubSpot, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +17.2% | +8.4% | +9.1% | −34.4% | −44.5% | −41.6% | −68.5% | +377% | 57.6% | -0.11 | −80.0% | — | $13B | — |
| NCNO Software - ApplicationnCino, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +5.7% | +20.5% | +15.5% | −12.4% | −13.1% | −21.7% | −70.0% | — | 54.1% | -0.18 | −85.7% | — | $2.3B | — |
| PYPL Financial - Credit ServicesPayPal Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +8.6% | +0.8% | +11.7% | −0.9% | −16.5% | +8.2% | −77.6% | +44.1% | 43.3% | -0.47 | −87.3% | — | $49B | — |
| GPN Financial - Credit ServicesGlobal Payments Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −0.6% | +3.3% | +17.2% | +13.4% | −1.3% | −21.1% | −44.7% | +22.4% | 36.9% | -0.14 | −70.2% | — | $22B | — |
| FIS Information Technology ServicesFidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +3.5% | −12.8% | −22.9% | −42.7% | −44.3% | −21.6% | −66.6% | −41.3% | 33.9% | -0.47 | −76.0% | — | $19B | — |
| ALKT Software - ApplicationAlkami Technology, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −20.8% | −18.5% | −17.4% | −35.4% | −36.8% | −18.8% | −49.1% | — | 48.9% | -0.03 | −79.0% | — | $1.6B | — |
| BILL Software - ApplicationBill.com Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +4.3% | +8.7% | +23.9% | −2.9% | −6.5% | −51.4% | −83.4% | — | 69.7% | -0.17 | −90.7% | — | $4.2B | — |
| BL Software - ApplicationBlackLine, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +9.3% | +3.4% | −1.8% | −41.9% | −40.3% | −41.8% | −75.1% | — | 46.4% | -0.37 | −83.2% | — | $1.8B | — |
How did INTU do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where INTU ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with INTU and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Among its popular alternatives, SHOP came out ahead of INTU most often, in eight of the ten years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, INTU finished in the top quarter in eight of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 4 of 23.
- INTU finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 18 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of INTU; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places INTU among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of INTU | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTU This pageIntuit Inc. | — | +6.1% | +1.2% | +61.8% | −39.1% | +70.3% | +46.1% | +34.1% | +25.9% | +39.2% | +20.2% | +5.9% | +22.1% | +29.7% | +14.3% | +7.0% | +60.4% | +29.2% | −24.7% | +3.6% | +14.5% | +21.1% | −16.7% | +12.6% | +9.7% | +8.5% | −34.2% | +148% | +75.8% | +30.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 8 of 29 | 4 of 23 | 18 of 23 | 7 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 2 of 22 | 10 of 21 | 11 of 20 | 9 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 6 of 19 | 12 of 17 | 2 of 12 | 10 of 12 | 8 of 11 | 5 of 11 | 2 of 11 | 7 of 11 | 6 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 9 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 1 of 9 | 3 of 7 | 6 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 5 of 7 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 8 of 10 | +51.4% | +36.5% | +124% | −74.8% | +21.7% | +185% | +187% | +37.1% | +135% | +66.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 9 of 29 | −10.2% | +28.4% | −0.3% | −1.3% | +42.6% | +5.9% | +32.7% | +14.3% | +16.5% | +24.3% | +4.1% | +20.5% | +45.6% | +8.5% | +20.2% | +11.7% | +12.7% | −9.0% | +2.8% | +9.1% | +5.1% | +13.5% | +2.4% | −32.7% | −6.4% | +18.3% | +35.3% | +31.7% | +44.6% |
| V Visa Inc. | 10 of 17 | +11.8% | +22.3% | +26.3% | −3.4% | −0.3% | +17.1% | +43.3% | +16.5% | +47.2% | +1.4% | +19.1% | +18.7% | +48.0% | +50.5% | +45.4% | −18.9% | +68.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. | 7 of 11 | −21.7% | 0.0% | −33.1% | −25.3% | −8.2% | +70.8% | +116% | +52.4% | +76.6% | +20.9% | +42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PCTY Paylocity Holding Corporation | 7 of 11 | −23.5% | +21.0% | −15.1% | −17.7% | +14.7% | +70.4% | +101% | +27.7% | +57.1% | −26.0% | +55.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc. | 5 of 11 | −28.3% | +132% | +61.6% | −66.2% | −37.2% | +56.1% | +63.6% | +34.5% | +27.7% | +9.4% | +40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WK Workiva Inc. | 6 of 11 | −21.2% | +7.8% | +20.9% | −35.6% | +42.4% | +118% | +17.2% | +67.7% | +56.8% | −22.3% | +31.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 11 of 21 | −20.2% | +27.8% | +98.5% | −47.8% | +14.2% | +36.8% | +18.7% | +34.0% | +49.3% | −12.7% | +32.2% | +7.5% | +31.3% | +65.8% | −23.2% | +79.0% | +130% | −49.0% | +72.0% | +13.7% | +88.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HRB H&R Block, Inc. | 11 of 29 | −14.9% | +12.1% | +36.9% | +59.9% | +55.4% | −28.0% | −3.6% | +0.5% | +18.2% | −28.4% | +1.3% | +18.9% | +60.8% | +19.4% | +43.2% | −45.0% | +3.1% | +25.8% | −17.3% | −3.9% | +2.6% | −10.1% | +40.1% | −8.7% | +121% | −2.8% | −0.6% | +2.6% | +57.6% |
| SAP SAP SE | 10 of 29 | −0.4% | +61.3% | +52.3% | −24.2% | +9.2% | −1.3% | +36.4% | −10.0% | +31.7% | +11.1% | +15.3% | −18.6% | +10.0% | +55.8% | +6.0% | +9.8% | +31.4% | −28.0% | −2.6% | +18.7% | +2.8% | +7.0% | +114% | −38.7% | −4.9% | −35.1% | +45.1% | +38.0% | +138% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 4 of 13 | −16.8% | −6.5% | +65.0% | −38.8% | +14.0% | +45.7% | +3.0% | +57.0% | +53.9% | −17.1% | −2.4% | −1.9% | +52.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAYX Paychex, Inc. | 8 of 29 | −17.5% | +21.3% | +6.2% | −13.2% | +50.1% | +13.3% | +34.5% | −1.1% | +15.4% | +18.9% | +18.4% | +5.0% | +48.9% | +9.7% | +1.4% | +5.3% | +22.1% | −24.6% | −6.0% | +5.7% | +13.7% | −7.1% | +35.3% | −18.8% | −27.6% | +83.5% | +17.6% | +53.4% | +48.7% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 13 of 29 | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% | +24.3% | +19.4% | −3.0% | +24.9% | +6.9% | −17.6% | +19.0% | +15.7% | +31.8% | −17.5% | +28.6% | +39.4% | −21.4% | +31.7% | +40.4% | −11.0% | +3.6% | +22.6% | −21.8% | −52.5% | +3.7% | +290% | +93.5% | −19.9% |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 13 of 29 | −15.1% | +71.0% | +94.5% | +38.0% | −15.1% | +36.4% | +100% | +22.1% | +28.5% | +26.7% | +30.4% | +15.2% | +49.8% | +17.5% | +53.8% | +10.1% | +27.0% | −47.4% | −20.7% | −7.8% | +20.7% | +12.2% | +15.3% | +1.8% | +85.6% | −3.6% | +15.0% | +39.0% | −14.7% |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 6 of 11 | −42.4% | +20.0% | +101% | −56.1% | +66.3% | +150% | +26.1% | +42.2% | +88.1% | −16.5% | +67.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NCNO nCino, Inc. | 0 of 5 | −23.6% | −0.1% | +27.2% | −51.8% | −24.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −31.4% | +39.0% | −13.8% | −62.2% | −19.5% | +117% | +28.6% | +14.2% | +86.5% | +9.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | 10 of 24 | −30.1% | −11.0% | +29.0% | −25.9% | −36.9% | +18.5% | +77.3% | +2.9% | +44.5% | +7.6% | +59.9% | +24.4% | +43.7% | −4.3% | +2.6% | −14.1% | +64.6% | −29.4% | +0.7% | −0.5% | +59.6% | +24.6% | +48.1% | −6.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 12 of 24 | −15.8% | +37.0% | −8.2% | −36.5% | −21.9% | +2.7% | +37.2% | +10.3% | +26.1% | +26.6% | −1.0% | +17.8% | +57.4% | +34.1% | −2.2% | +17.7% | +45.4% | +282% | +4.7% | +19.1% | +15.6% | +9.6% | +34.5% | −28.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ALKT Alkami Technology, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −37.1% | +51.3% | +66.2% | −27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BILL Bill.com Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −35.6% | +3.8% | −25.1% | −56.3% | +82.5% | +259% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BL BlackLine, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −9.0% | −2.7% | −7.2% | −35.0% | −22.4% | +159% | +25.9% | +24.9% | +18.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How INTU has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were INTU's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents INTU's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1993, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of INTU's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: INTU fell 75.3% from December 1995 to April 1997, while the S&P 500 rose 27.7%.
- The slowest recovery came after INTU fell 72.5% from January 2000 to April 2001; it did not regain that peak until August 2010, nine years later.
Green means INTU fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | INTU fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −75.3% | +27.7% | Dec 1995 | Apr 1997 | 16 months | Jan 1999 | 21 months |
| Dot-com bust | −72.5% | −23.5% | Jan 2000 | Apr 2001 | 15 months | Aug 2010 | 9.3 years |
| No named crash | −68.2% | +17.0% | Jul 2025 | Jun 2026 | 11 months | Not yet | — |
| 2022 bear market | −49.0% | −15.1% | Nov 2021 | May 2022 | 6 months | Nov 2024 | 2.5 years |
| No named crash | −43.8% | −7.3% | Feb 1994 | May 1994 | 3 months | Oct 1994 | 5 months |
How did INTU do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far INTU, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- INTU fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when INTU fell 66.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, V held up best, falling less than INTU in seven of the eight crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than INTU.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTU This pageIntuit Inc. | — | −6.0% | −42.7% | −36.3% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −24.8% | −18.0% | −3.4% | −38.3% | −66.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 2 of 6 | −5.1% | −79.0% | −40.7% | −27.6% | −5.4% | −49.2% | — | — | — | — |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 8 of 10 | −3.3% | −19.9% | −39.5% | −19.2% | −8.7% | −14.1% | −15.8% | 0.0% | −35.7% | −53.6% |
| V Visa Inc. | 7 of 8 | −3.5% | −24.1% | −36.4% | −19.1% | −5.8% | −15.8% | −11.5% | −0.8% | — | — |
| PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −5.4% | −33.7% | −44.9% | −29.9% | −6.4% | −50.8% | — | — | — | — |
| PCTY Paylocity Holding Corporation | 1 of 6 | −6.3% | −30.6% | −47.6% | −33.1% | −13.0% | −45.6% | — | — | — | — |
| QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −34.8% | −61.4% | −43.2% | −28.6% | −4.2% | −43.9% | — | — | — | — |
| WK Workiva Inc. | 2 of 6 | −6.0% | −51.4% | −49.1% | −19.1% | −1.1% | −39.2% | — | — | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −5.3% | −42.7% | −35.7% | −24.8% | −6.1% | −34.2% | −26.9% | −4.2% | −70.5% | — |
| HRB H&R Block, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −6.3% | −20.9% | −46.9% | −17.0% | −3.9% | −15.2% | −17.9% | −1.3% | −41.3% | −40.7% |
| SAP SAP SE | 5 of 10 | −2.0% | −41.9% | −32.6% | −25.0% | −6.9% | −13.3% | −25.0% | −1.4% | −49.6% | −87.9% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −2.8% | −47.0% | −42.4% | −17.3% | −5.8% | −42.3% | — | — | — | — |
| PAYX Paychex, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −4.3% | −22.6% | −44.1% | −17.4% | −7.1% | −14.8% | −14.6% | −1.0% | −49.5% | −64.9% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 6 of 10 | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 5 of 10 | −2.5% | −34.8% | −50.9% | −25.4% | −7.8% | −16.0% | −32.8% | −0.6% | −75.1% | −45.8% |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −8.4% | −53.8% | −47.3% | −24.8% | −6.8% | −53.8% | — | — | — | — |
| NCNO nCino, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −19.4% | −53.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 5 of 6 | −4.4% | −63.8% | −31.2% | −16.7% | −5.6% | −21.6% | — | — | — | — |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1 of 9 | −11.9% | −29.2% | −44.3% | −25.4% | −7.5% | −27.8% | −18.6% | −5.7% | −44.4% | — |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −20.2% | −38.5% | −34.7% | −13.1% | −8.0% | −23.4% | −23.3% | 0.0% | −46.4% | — |
| ALKT Alkami Technology, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −18.9% | −51.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BILL Bill.com Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −17.5% | −62.1% | −53.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BL BlackLine, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −9.9% | −48.5% | −38.4% | −37.6% | −2.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does INTU move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares INTU with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 11 of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than INTU's 0.79, led by V, SHOP and HRB.
- V took just 79% of the S&P 500's losses, against 126% for INTU, while still keeping 93% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, INTU captured 99% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 126% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.03. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than INTU's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTU This pageIntuit Inc. | 99% | 126% | 0.79 | 1.03 |
| V Visa Inc. | 93% | 79% | 1.18 | 0.87 |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 233% | 203% | 1.15 | 2.09 |
| HRB H&R Block, Inc. | 64% | 61% | 1.04 | 0.61 |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 89% | 88% | 1.01 | 0.79 |
| PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. | 110% | 114% | 0.97 | 1.12 |
| PCTY Paylocity Holding Corporation | 94% | 106% | 0.89 | 0.88 |
| WK Workiva Inc. | 108% | 123% | 0.88 | 0.99 |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 137% | 159% | 0.86 | 1.31 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 131% | 159% | 0.82 | 1.30 |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 121% | 149% | 0.81 | 1.46 |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 115% | 143% | 0.80 | 1.16 |
| PAYX Paychex, Inc. | 87% | 114% | 0.77 | 0.89 |
| SAP SAP SE | 112% | 152% | 0.74 | 1.10 |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 96% | 139% | 0.70 | 1.19 |
| QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc. | 102% | 154% | 0.66 | 1.43 |
| PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 106% | 186% | 0.57 | 1.25 |
| GPN Global Payments Inc. | 76% | 139% | 0.54 | 0.98 |
| FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 54% | 150% | 0.36 | 0.82 |
What diversifies INTU?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with INTU's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing INTU with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in INTU into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-11.9% for INTU alone, -4.0% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of INTU over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.24 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, CLS and FIX have moved largely independently of INTU over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.20 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which INTU lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% INTU and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2008 | 2004 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTU Intuit Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −38.8% | -0.06 | −39.1% | −24.7% | −16.7% | −34.2% | 35.9% | −11.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.15 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | — | — | — | 29.1% | −5.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.02 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −20.8% | — | — | 28.9% | −4.0% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.24 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | — | — | — | 29.6% | −6.0% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.21 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | — | — | — | 29.5% | −6.5% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.10 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −44.7% | −19.3% | — | 30.3% | −1.8% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.22 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | — | — | — | 29.3% | −6.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.03 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | +4.9% | — | — | 29.1% | −5.3% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.20 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | — | — | — | 29.9% | −4.9% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2008 | 2004 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTU Intuit Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −38.8% | -0.06 | −39.1% | −24.7% | −16.7% | −34.2% | 35.9% | −11.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.07 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −39.6% | −4.7% | +108% | 29.6% | −2.1% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.20 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −20.5% | −6.4% | −2.3% | 33.1% | +8.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.09 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | −15.2% | +40.0% | −71.1% | 30.9% | +5.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.15 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −40.4% | −1.4% | +61.2% | 29.9% | −2.7% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.24 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | — | — | — | 30.9% | −0.5% |
Common questions
What was INTU's worst drawdown?
INTU's deepest decline since it began trading in 1993 was 75.3%, from December 1995 to April 1997. It took 21 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were INTU's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, INTU's best year was 1999, when it returned 148%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -39.1%.
Is there a better investment than INTU?
Among INTU's popular alternatives, V, SAP and ADP earned more than INTU with less volatility over the past 5 years. V returned 12.8% a year at 22.9% volatility, against a loss of 9.4% a year at 39.1%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSFT (software) and ADI (semiconductors) earned more than INTU with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 9.4% a year at 39.1%.
Is INTU more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. INTU's volatility over the past 5 years was 39.1%, 2.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, INTU's return lands within 39.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is INTU's Sharpe ratio?
INTU's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.06, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so INTU earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is INTU with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, INTU's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.44 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against INTU instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a INTU holding.
What are the best alternatives to INTU?
Of the 22 popular alternatives we compared, 12 outperformed INTU in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: SHOP, ADP and V.
Did INTU outperform the S&P 500?
INTU finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 18 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +6.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did INTU do in stock market crashes?
INTU fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when INTU fell 66.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies INTU?
These had a low correlation with INTU over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.15), DXJ (correlation 0.02) and EMLP (correlation 0.24); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.07), CLS (correlation 0.20) and FIX (correlation 0.09). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than INTU's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of INTU's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to INTU
SHOPShopify
ADPAutomatic Data Processing
VVisa
CRMSalesforce
SAPSAP
WDAYWorkday
PAYXPaychex
ORCLOracle
PYPLPayPal