Relative Intelligence · Insurance

How Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on MRSH alone. It places MRSH (Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.) against 14 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where MRSH stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: MRSH's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowIts insurance peers split over the past 3 months: CRVL (CorVel) rose 32.6%, while AON fell 18.0%. MRSH has edged past the market, rising 5.6% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?MRSH held up far better than its industry: it rose 5.6% over the past 3 months while the insurance ETF KIE (State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF) fell 1.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. MRSH rose 11.4% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsThe long record (ahead of 67% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 10 years) has not carried into the past 3 years (behind 74% of them). Over the past year, MRSH rose 2.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (6.7% against 89.3%). Market rank ↓
- Long termMRSH turned $10,000 into $34,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 19.2% off MRSH, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than RYAN (Ryan Specialty, 17.7%) but less than AON (25.4%). MRSH fell less than the S&P 500 in two of the last three sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (19.2% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationMRSH is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.46 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.45 with the total US market, more closely than 64% of stocks worth at least $300 million. MRSH moves far less with the S&P 500 than it used to, with a correlation of 0.46 over the past 5 years against 0.76 in the 5 years before. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- TRV (Travelers Companies) and CB (Chubb) earned more than MRSH over the past 5 years with similar volatility: TRV returned 22.4% a year at 22.3% volatility, against 4.4% a year at 20.9%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway, insurance) and SLF (Sun Life Financial, life insurance) earned more than MRSH with less volatility over the past 5 years. BRK-B returned 13.4% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 4.4% a year at 20.9%.
- Whole market
- 479 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MRSH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in MRSH have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in MRSH over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of MRSH over the same span and MRSH's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in MRSH at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $128,394 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the seven other investments on the chart ended ahead of MRSH, and AJG finished highest, at $566,042.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 447 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MRSH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 2 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AJG$566,042+5,560% total · +14.9% a year
- CRVL$524,989+5,150% total · +14.6% a year
- BRO$475,780+4,658% total · +14.2% a year
- CB$184,681+1,747% total · +10.6% a year
- TRV$178,972+1,690% total · +10.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- MRSH$128,394+1,184% total · +9.2% a year
- AON$121,759+1,118% total · +9.0% a year
- AIG$2,068−79.3% total · −5.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,108 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MRSH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- TRV$25,788+158% total · +20.9% a year
- CB$20,160+102% total · +15.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- SLF$18,746+87.5% total · +13.4% a year
- THG$18,550+85.5% total · +13.2% a year
- BRK-B$18,244+82.4% total · +12.8% a year
- AJG$16,159+61.6% total · +10.1% a year
- WTW$13,256+32.6% total · +5.8% a year
- MRSH$12,121+21.2% total · +3.9% a year
- CRVL$12,010+20.1% total · +3.7% a year
MRSH at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- MRSH's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 67.5%, from October 2000 to March 2009. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, MRSH's best was 1999, when it returned 67.8%, and its worst was 2004, when it lost 29.8%. It lost money in 12 of those years.
- MRSH is 19.7% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $91B
- Industry
- Insurance - Brokers
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +2.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +6.7%+2.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +24.3%+4.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +245%+13.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +67.8%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −29.8%2004
- Losing years
- 12 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 20.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.31return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −67.5%Oct 2000 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −19.7%below the peak
MRSH against the whole market
Where MRSH ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does MRSH rank among all stocks?
This section ranks MRSH on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how MRSH stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- MRSH's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 3% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | MRSH | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +2.3% | 1,888 of 3,287 | bottom 44% |
| 3-year return | +6.7% | 2,218 of 3,017 | bottom 27% |
| 5-year return | +24.3% | 1,399 of 2,893 | top 48% |
| 10-year return | +245% | 718 of 2,202 | top 33% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 20.9% | 122 of 2,893 | top 4% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.31 | 1,504 of 2,893 | bottom 49% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −35.8% | 73 of 2,187 | top 3% |
What has beaten MRSH on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). MRSH sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than MRSH with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 34 stocks and 445 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than MRSH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 13% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half MRSH's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 47% less than MRSH's 20.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.31 for MRSH. DXJ earned the most, 26.6% a year, while still swinging less than MRSH (19.1% against 20.9%).
- None of MRSH's popular alternatives made it, but BRK-B (insurance) did: 13.4% a year at 17.1% volatility, 18% less than MRSH's 20.9%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to MRSH; faint dots are 90 more of the 479 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than MRSH?
Investments that beat MRSH over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among MRSH's popular alternatives, TRV and CB earned more than MRSH over the past 5 years with similar volatility: TRV returned 22.4% a year at 22.3% volatility, against 4.4% a year at 20.9%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BRK-B (insurance) and SLF (life insurance) earned more than MRSH with less volatility over the past 5 years. BRK-B returned 13.4% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 4.4% a year at 20.9%.
- Across the whole market, 479 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MRSH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat MRSH over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks MRSH's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than MRSH follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than MRSH's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× MRSH's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than MRSH's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with MRSH?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +4.4% | 20.9% | 0.31 | −35.8% | +245% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.46 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against MRSH. 3 of 12 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.55 | — | ||
CRVLCorVel Corporation · Insurance | Higher return in most periods | +7.0% | 33.2% | 0.37 | −64.2% | +594% | 0.38 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatility | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.60 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Insurance and the categories next to it (Property & Casualty Insurance, Life Insurance), plus MRSH's specific themes. 25 of 50 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.67 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +11.7% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | +255% | 0.46 | — | ||
THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.41 | — | |
AFGAmerican Financial Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +9.8% | 22.6% | 0.53 | −59.0% | +321% | 0.52 | — | |
LLoews Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return, lower volatility | +14.3% | 19.2% | 0.80 | −48.5% | +180% | 0.53 | — | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.52 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 885 of 3,571 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +7.2% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | +68.8% | 0.46 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.58 | 0.08% | ||
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.12 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.65 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.27 | — | ||
| On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.06 | 0.09% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.54 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for MRSH
- Annual return
- MRSH returned 4.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $12,400. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- MRSH's volatility over the past 5 years was 20.9%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MRSH's return lands within 20.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- MRSH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.31, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MRSH earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- MRSH's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 35.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 35.8% fall takes a 55.8% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, MRSH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.46 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MRSH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MRSH holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 479 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than MRSH with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with MRSH | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.40 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +7.2% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | +68.8% | 0.46 | — | |
| 3 | Same or nearby category | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.67 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.58 | 0.08% | |
| 5 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.12 | — |
| 6 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.65 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.27 | — | |
| 8 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.30 | 0.60% |
| 9 | DBMFiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +9.8% | 12.4% | 0.82 | −20.4% | — | -0.17 | 0.85% |
| 10 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.42 | 0.12% |
| 11 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.61 | — | |
| 12 | FHLCFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +7.3% | 15.4% | 0.53 | −28.8% | +199% | 0.57 | 0.08% |
| 13 | IHEiShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.6% | 16.8% | 0.80 | −29.6% | +151% | 0.49 | 0.37% |
| 14 | PPHVanEck Pharmaceutical ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.8% | 0.78 | −29.7% | +153% | 0.57 | 0.36% |
| 15 | PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Technology | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.1% | 0.73 | −28.1% | +305% | 0.06 | 0.65% |
| 16 | FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −19.4% | +121% | 0.28 | 0.75% |
| 17 | GSPYGotham Enhanced 500 ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.2% | 16.6% | 0.83 | −23.3% | — | 0.48 | 0.65% |
| 18 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.50 | — | |
| 19 | RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +6.1% | 16.8% | 0.44 | −30.4% | +177% | 0.58 | 0.40% |
| 20 | LGHHCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.4% | 16.7% | 0.63 | −29.6% | — | 0.40 | 1.00% |
| 21 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.60 | 0.03% | |
| 22 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.63 | 0.06% | |
| 23 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.39 | 0.69% |
| 24 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.31 | 0.60% |
| 25 | Whole market | +11.9% | 19.4% | 0.68 | −54.4% | +30.4% | 0.24 | — | |
| 26 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.19 | 0.80% |
| 27 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.20 | 0.40% | |
| 28 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.61 | 0.56% |
| 29 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.66 | 0.08% |
| 30 | USMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF · US Low-Volatility Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 12.3% | 0.66 | −33.1% | +176% | 0.75 | 0.15% |
| 31 | COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.7% | 0.70 | −38.7% | — | 0.57 | 0.49% |
| 32 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.50 | 0.21% | |
| 33 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.60 | 0.39% |
| 34 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.46 | 0.79% |
| 35 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.37 | 0.85% |
| 36 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.55 | 0.12% |
| 37 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.29 | 0.15% |
| 38 | Whole market | +7.5% | 11.0% | 0.71 | −13.7% | — | 0.71 | 0.35% | |
| 39 | PDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Broad Commodities | Whole market | +11.7% | 19.3% | 0.67 | −40.7% | +153% | 0.12 | 0.74% |
| 40 | Same or nearby category | +11.7% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | +255% | 0.46 | — | |
| 41 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.50 | 0.27% |
| 42 | GUNRNorthern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF · Natural Resources Equity | Whole market | +10.1% | 18.8% | 0.60 | −43.0% | +173% | 0.46 | 0.47% |
| 43 | DSIiShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF · US ESG Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.1% | 0.72 | −34.1% | +322% | 0.42 | 0.25% |
| 44 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.53 | 0.15% |
| 45 | HYGHiShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +6.6% | 7.1% | 0.94 | −23.9% | +74.5% | 0.43 | 1.12% |
| 46 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | 0.17 | 0.98% |
| 47 | AEEAmeren Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.9% | 19.4% | 0.49 | −29.1% | +192% | 0.46 | — |
| 48 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.32 | 0.45% |
| 49 | DFAIDimensional - International Core Equity Market ETF · Developed International Equity | Whole market | +9.7% | 16.0% | 0.66 | −27.4% | — | 0.52 | 0.18% |
| 50 | BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · Buffered Equity | Whole market | +9.9% | 10.5% | 0.96 | −13.7% | — | 0.46 | 0.10% |
| 51 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.61 | 0.05% |
| 52 | PWVInvesco Large Cap Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.2% | 0.97 | −37.6% | +223% | 0.65 | 0.55% |
| 53 | NULVNuveen ESG Large-Cap Value · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.2% | 14.2% | 0.69 | −37.0% | — | 0.59 | 0.26% |
| 54 | DIVOAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +11.1% | 11.9% | 0.95 | −30.0% | — | 0.61 | 0.56% |
| 55 | XLPState Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF · Consumer Staples | Whole market | +7.2% | 13.8% | 0.57 | −24.5% | +121% | 0.62 | 0.08% |
| 56 | DSTLDistillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 16.1% | 0.75 | −33.1% | — | 0.67 | 0.39% |
| 57 | FDLOFidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.8% | 13.0% | 0.79 | −34.4% | +249% | 0.67 | 0.15% |
| 58 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.6% | 0.85 | −41.3% | — | 0.55 | 0.18% |
| 59 | FTXHFirst Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.9% | 16.9% | 0.75 | −32.1% | +153% | 0.45 | 0.60% |
| 60 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.33 | 0.50% |
| 61 | JVALJPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.0% | 17.2% | 0.75 | −40.4% | — | 0.43 | 0.12% |
| 62 | IDHQInvesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF · International | Whole market | +10.0% | 17.9% | 0.63 | −33.6% | +183% | 0.51 | 0.29% |
| 63 | EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 11.9% | 0.68 | −27.6% | +97.7% | 0.60 | 0.20% |
| 64 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.45 | — | |
| 65 | DJPiPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return(SM) ETN · Commodities | Whole market | +11.2% | 18.9% | 0.66 | −38.4% | +120% | 0.16 | 0.70% |
| 66 | FYLDCambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.0% | 0.85 | −44.6% | +203% | 0.46 | 0.59% |
| 67 | EYLDCambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF · International | Whole market | +11.9% | 18.4% | 0.70 | −41.8% | +199% | 0.23 | 0.63% |
| 68 | FTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.4% | 0.99 | −20.6% | +158% | 0.50 | 0.95% |
| 69 | PTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.5% | 11.8% | 0.83 | −26.6% | +188% | 0.32 | 0.60% |
| 70 | DVYEiShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +5.8% | 17.1% | 0.42 | −40.9% | +96.4% | 0.28 | 0.49% |
| 71 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.15 | 0.70% |
| 72 | DJDInvesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.8% | 13.3% | 0.91 | −34.7% | +227% | 0.58 | 0.07% |
| 73 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.51 | 0.09% |
| 74 | AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +6.4% | 10.7% | 0.64 | −23.0% | +118% | 0.46 | 0.20% |
| 75 | ACIOAptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.3% | 11.1% | 0.86 | −14.2% | — | 0.43 | 0.79% |
| 76 | FEMFirst Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund · International | Whole market | +8.0% | 18.7% | 0.51 | −46.2% | +121% | 0.22 | 0.80% |
| 77 | SCHYSchwab International Dividend Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +9.5% | 13.3% | 0.75 | −24.0% | — | 0.51 | 0.08% |
| 78 | IHDGWisdomTree International Hedged Quality Dividend Growth Fund · International | Whole market | +7.6% | 14.9% | 0.57 | −29.2% | +163% | 0.54 | 0.58% |
| 79 | INFLHorizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.8% | 17.8% | 0.72 | −21.3% | — | 0.62 | 0.85% |
| 80 | TDVGT. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.6% | 13.8% | 0.73 | −19.2% | — | 0.65 | 0.50% |
| 81 | AVESAvantis Emerging Markets Value ETF · International | Whole market | +8.0% | 17.4% | 0.53 | −27.4% | — | 0.24 | 0.36% |
| 82 | FLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +8.4% | 13.4% | 0.68 | −22.9% | — | 0.22 | 0.65% |
| 83 | SMIGBahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +6.5% | 16.0% | 0.48 | −19.7% | — | 0.59 | 0.60% |
| 84 | SIXHETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity Index Option ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.2% | 1.00 | −11.7% | — | 0.60 | 0.31% |
| 85 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.27 | 0.48% |
| 86 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.52 | 0.40% |
| 87 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.42 | 0.05% | |
| 88 | WTPIWisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +9.1% | 12.2% | 0.78 | −28.4% | +121% | 0.46 | 0.44% |
| 89 | CDCVictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +6.0% | 12.5% | 0.53 | −21.4% | +168% | 0.61 | 0.38% |
| 90 | BKMCBNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +7.0% | 18.9% | 0.46 | −25.0% | — | 0.49 | 0.04% |
| 91 | KMLMKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +5.8% | 14.6% | 0.46 | −27.5% | — | -0.13 | 0.90% |
| 92 | IDUBAptus International Enhanced Yield ETF · International | Whole market | +5.9% | 14.9% | 0.46 | −29.2% | — | 0.38 | 0.44% |
| 93 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.62 | 0.04% | |
| 94 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.50 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.46 | 0.06% | |
| 96 | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | 0.36 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +6.8% | 19.4% | 0.44 | −38.7% | +122% | 0.16 | 0.09% | |
| 98 | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.9% | 0.56 | −44.1% | +103% | 0.49 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +7.5% | 18.0% | 0.50 | −37.4% | +132% | 0.46 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.44 | 0.26% |
MRSH against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against MRSH, compared period by period and year by year.
How do MRSH's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at MRSH, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only CB was both more rewarding and calmer than MRSH over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Six of the 12 popular alternatives earned less than MRSH over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, MRSH returned 4.4% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (20.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than MRSH with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | +22.4% | 22.3% |
| CB Chubb Limited | +15.7% | 20.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | +10.9% | 24.2% |
| AIG American International Group, Inc. | +9.0% | 25.9% |
| CRVL CorVel Corporation | +7.0% | 33.2% |
| WTW Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company | +6.9% | 23.9% |
| MRSH This pageMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | +4.4% | 20.9% |
| RYAN Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. | +3.4% | 35.2% |
| BRO Brown & Brown, Inc. | +2.6% | 26.0% |
| AON Aon plc | −0.3% | 23.8% |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | −1.4% | 25.9% |
| ACN Accenture plc | −5.2% | 32.7% |
| GSHD Goosehead Insurance, Inc | −22.3% | 60.0% |
Has MRSH consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares MRSH with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than MRSH helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- CRVL and TRV outperformed MRSH in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 14 popular alternatives, CRVL and TRV, outperformed MRSH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- WTW earned more for the risk it took than MRSH (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than MRSH over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (this page) | — | +11.4% | +5.6% | +10.2% | +6.5% | +2.3% | +6.7% | +24.3% | +245% | 20.9% | 0.31 | −35.8% | — | $91B | — |
| CRVL QualifiedCorVel Corporation | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +13.2% | +32.6% | +48.6% | +23.7% | +10.1% | +22.7% | +40.1% | +594% | 33.2% | 0.37 | −64.2% | — | $4.1B | — |
| TRV QualifiedThe Travelers Companies, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +6.6% | +7.8% | +32.6% | +40.3% | +51.5% | +158% | +174% | +347% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | — | $83B | — |
| AJG Insurance - BrokersArthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 1/5 short3/3 long | +9.6% | +2.5% | +16.9% | +2.2% | −6.1% | +17.3% | +68.0% | +516% | 24.2% | 0.55 | −44.4% | — | $66B | — |
| CB Insurance - Property & CasualtyChubb Limited | 2/5 short2/3 long | +6.1% | +1.8% | +9.1% | +16.4% | +35.0% | +78.9% | +107% | +248% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | — | $138B | — |
| WTW Insurance - BrokersWillis Towers Watson Public Limited Company | 1/5 short2/3 long | +4.2% | +9.0% | +8.2% | −1.3% | −2.2% | +60.7% | +39.6% | +187% | 23.9% | 0.40 | −32.9% | — | $30B | — |
| AIG Insurance - DiversifiedAmerican International Group, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | +9.8% | +3.3% | +5.6% | −1.0% | +8.0% | +47.1% | +54.1% | +75.5% | 25.9% | 0.47 | −69.6% | — | $43B | — |
| BRO Insurance - BrokersBrown & Brown, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | +10.3% | +3.1% | +5.2% | −8.0% | −18.2% | +7.9% | +13.8% | +317% | 26.0% | 0.23 | −55.8% | — | $24B | — |
| BWIN Insurance - BrokersThe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | 0.0% | +18.3% | +23.5% | +34.1% | +39.9% | — | — | — | — | — | −70.2% | — | $2.6B | — |
| ACN Information Technology ServicesAccenture plc | 3/5 short0/3 long | +29.5% | +66.5% | +25.1% | −4.8% | +2.2% | −13.6% | −23.6% | +146% | 32.7% | 0.00 | −67.8% | — | $146B | — |
| RYAN Insurance - BrokersRyan Specialty Holdings, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +7.1% | +2.5% | +14.0% | −14.3% | −17.3% | −2.3% | +18.3% | — | 35.2% | 0.28 | −60.9% | — | $5.2B | — |
| TWFG Insurance - BrokersTWFG, Inc. Common Stock | 1/5 short0/3 long | +0.1% | −6.0% | +30.3% | −8.1% | +1.7% | — | — | — | — | — | −52.7% | — | $332M | — |
| AON Insurance - BrokersAon plc | 0/5 short0/3 long | +2.0% | −18.0% | −10.2% | −13.2% | −13.0% | −3.1% | −1.6% | +195% | 23.8% | 0.11 | −38.7% | — | $63B | — |
| VRSK Software - ServicesVerisk Analytics, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +11.0% | −5.2% | +6.8% | −13.0% | −18.1% | −16.8% | −6.7% | +151% | 25.9% | 0.08 | −50.8% | — | $25B | — |
| GSHD Insurance - BrokersGoosehead Insurance, Inc | 0/5 short0/3 long | −9.1% | −17.9% | +5.3% | −33.0% | −28.1% | −30.2% | −71.7% | — | 60.0% | -0.12 | −83.4% | — | $1.7B | — |
How did MRSH do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where MRSH ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with MRSH and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- MRSH finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 16 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, AJG came out ahead of MRSH most often, in 17 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, MRSH finished in the top quarter in four of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 8 of 15.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of MRSH; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places MRSH among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of MRSH | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSH This pageMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | — | −11.3% | +13.8% | +16.1% | −3.5% | +50.8% | +6.9% | +42.3% | −0.1% | +22.7% | +24.6% | −1.1% | +20.9% | +43.8% | +12.1% | +19.1% | +28.2% | −5.4% | −5.5% | −11.4% | −1.1% | −1.2% | −29.8% | +6.9% | −12.0% | −6.3% | +24.5% | +67.8% | +20.9% | +47.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 29 | 8 of 15 | 11 of 13 | 7 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 4 of 12 | 7 of 12 | 5 of 12 | 7 of 11 | 5 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 8 of 11 | 1 of 11 | 4 of 11 | 8 of 11 | 2 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 7 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 6 of 8 | 7 of 8 | 1 of 8 | 3 of 8 | 4 of 8 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 13 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| CRVL CorVel Corporation | 16 of 29 | −39.2% | +35.0% | +70.1% | −30.1% | +96.2% | +21.3% | +41.6% | +16.7% | +44.5% | −16.7% | +18.0% | −20.3% | +108% | −13.3% | +7.0% | +44.2% | +52.7% | −4.7% | −51.6% | +276% | −29.2% | −28.7% | +5.3% | +9.1% | +42.2% | +47.1% | +32.8% | −6.4% | +30.8% |
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +22.4% | +28.8% | +3.9% | +22.4% | +14.0% | +5.3% | +17.0% | −9.7% | +13.4% | +11.0% | +9.1% | +19.6% | +29.1% | +24.8% | +9.3% | +14.8% | +13.5% | −13.8% | +2.4% | +22.9% | +23.2% | −3.6% | +20.3% | −20.1% | −16.9% | +65.7% | 0.0% | −12.9% | +43.6% |
| AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 17 of 29 | −8.0% | +27.4% | +20.5% | +12.4% | +39.0% | +32.1% | +31.8% | +19.2% | +25.1% | +31.1% | −10.1% | +3.5% | +40.0% | +7.6% | +20.3% | +35.6% | −7.8% | +12.7% | −14.3% | −0.1% | −1.2% | +3.3% | +13.4% | −13.1% | +10.4% | +100% | +51.8% | +32.5% | +15.3% |
| CB Chubb Limited | 14 of 29 | +14.5% | +23.9% | +4.2% | +16.0% | +27.9% | +1.4% | +22.9% | −9.6% | +12.8% | +15.6% | +5.3% | +14.4% | +31.9% | +17.6% | +14.5% | +26.4% | −1.8% | −13.0% | +3.8% | +15.4% | +27.5% | +5.3% | +44.3% | −25.4% | −3.7% | +159% | −50.6% | +7.8% | +62.3% |
| WTW Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company | 13 of 24 | +6.1% | +31.5% | +0.1% | +4.5% | +14.2% | +5.8% | +34.8% | +2.4% | +25.0% | −3.4% | +11.5% | +2.8% | +37.3% | −10.9% | +15.1% | +35.6% | +10.4% | −32.1% | −2.0% | +10.4% | −8.1% | +23.3% | +21.1% | +21.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| AIG American International Group, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +20.0% | +9.8% | +9.8% | +13.8% | +53.9% | −23.1% | +33.6% | −32.1% | −6.9% | +7.8% | +12.1% | +10.7% | +45.2% | +52.1% | −43.6% | +92.2% | −4.6% | −97.2% | −17.6% | +6.2% | +5.0% | −0.5% | +15.1% | −26.9% | −19.3% | +37.0% | +40.2% | +33.7% | +51.2% |
| BRO Brown & Brown, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −21.4% | +44.3% | +25.7% | −18.4% | +49.3% | +21.1% | +44.7% | +8.3% | +16.2% | +41.8% | −1.1% | +6.1% | +24.8% | +14.1% | −4.1% | +35.3% | −12.5% | −9.8% | −16.0% | −6.9% | +41.2% | +34.5% | +1.8% | +19.1% | +57.1% | +84.6% | +11.0% | +18.8% | +71.1% |
| BWIN The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. | 0 of 1 | −38.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ACN Accenture plc | 13 of 24 | −22.1% | +1.9% | +33.6% | −34.8% | +60.7% | +26.0% | +51.2% | −6.2% | +33.3% | +14.3% | +20.8% | +11.4% | +26.6% | +27.7% | +12.0% | +19.1% | +29.0% | −7.5% | −1.4% | +29.3% | +8.3% | +2.6% | +46.3% | −33.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| RYAN Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 4 | −18.9% | +50.9% | +3.6% | +2.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TWFG TWFG, Inc. Common Stock | 1 of 1 | −6.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AON Aon plc | 14 of 29 | −0.9% | +24.4% | −2.3% | +0.6% | +43.4% | +2.4% | +44.7% | +9.9% | +21.1% | +22.5% | −1.6% | +14.3% | +52.4% | +20.3% | +2.9% | +21.8% | −14.8% | −2.9% | +37.0% | −0.1% | +54.3% | +2.2% | +30.3% | −45.2% | +6.3% | −11.9% | +10.7% | −3.8% | +44.6% |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 6 of 16 | −18.2% | +16.0% | +36.2% | −22.3% | +10.8% | +39.9% | +37.9% | +13.6% | +18.3% | +5.6% | +20.0% | −2.5% | +28.9% | +27.0% | +17.8% | +12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GSHD Goosehead Insurance, Inc | 4 of 7 | −27.4% | +41.4% | +121% | −73.6% | +5.7% | +197% | +64.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How MRSH has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were MRSH's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents MRSH's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of MRSH's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: MRSH fell 34.4% from April 2025 to June 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 42.1%.
- The slowest recovery came after MRSH fell 67.5% from October 2000 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until November 2013, five years later.
Green means MRSH fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | MRSH fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −67.5% | −43.4% | Oct 2000 | Mar 2009 | 8.4 years | Nov 2013 | 4.7 years |
| No named crash | −38.0% | — | Aug 1987 | Dec 1987 | 4 months | Jul 1989 | 19 months |
| Covid crash | −35.8% | −33.4% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Aug 2020 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −34.4% | +42.1% | Apr 2025 | Jun 2026 | 14 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −30.4% | −16.4% | Jul 1998 | Oct 1998 | 3 months | Feb 1999 | 4 months |
How did MRSH do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far MRSH, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, BRO held up best, falling less than MRSH in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- MRSH fell less than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when MRSH fell 46.2% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than MRSH.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSH This pageMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | — | −4.3% | −19.2% | −35.3% | −15.2% | −6.4% | −12.0% | −13.8% | −1.1% | −46.2% | −45.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CRVL CorVel Corporation | 4 of 10 | −1.3% | −36.0% | −34.6% | −15.3% | −6.4% | −11.4% | −22.0% | −2.6% | −57.2% | −20.8% |
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −2.6% | −18.9% | −39.2% | −15.7% | −8.8% | −11.4% | −18.1% | −1.1% | −43.7% | −55.1% |
| AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 2 of 10 | −4.8% | −18.8% | −37.0% | −11.5% | −6.1% | −23.1% | −13.4% | −1.1% | −46.0% | −41.2% |
| CB Chubb Limited | 3 of 10 | −5.6% | −19.1% | −42.2% | −13.6% | −8.4% | −9.7% | −13.7% | −0.2% | −51.2% | −52.4% |
| WTW Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company | 2 of 9 | −4.9% | −21.4% | −30.3% | −9.0% | −5.9% | −17.8% | −18.3% | −2.4% | −54.2% | — |
| AIG American International Group, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −12.7% | −25.5% | −61.8% | −32.5% | −7.6% | −21.1% | −30.6% | 0.0% | −99.5% | −50.5% |
| BRO Brown & Brown, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −4.9% | −27.3% | −34.8% | −13.6% | −5.4% | −15.9% | −22.9% | 0.0% | −42.1% | −31.4% |
| ACN Accenture plc | 3 of 9 | −4.7% | −37.3% | −33.5% | −22.6% | −4.1% | −14.9% | −22.7% | −1.9% | −35.7% | — |
| RYAN Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −9.4% | −17.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AON Aon plc | 4 of 10 | −2.4% | −25.4% | −38.7% | −17.0% | −5.3% | −17.4% | −20.7% | 0.0% | −30.3% | −66.5% |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 3 of 8 | −2.6% | −28.4% | −28.5% | −17.4% | −6.6% | −19.1% | −8.0% | −1.0% | — | — |
| GSHD Goosehead Insurance, Inc | 0 of 4 | −6.5% | −74.3% | −36.7% | −39.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does MRSH move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares MRSH with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Five of the ten popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than MRSH's 0.96, led by AJG, TRV and CB.
- AJG took just 46% of the S&P 500's losses, against 83% for MRSH, while still keeping 80% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, MRSH captured 80% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 83% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.77. Its share of the market's losses was slightly larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than MRSH's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSH This pageMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 80% | 83% | 0.96 | 0.77 |
| AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 80% | 46% | 1.74 | 0.61 |
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 70% | 48% | 1.48 | 0.59 |
| CB Chubb Limited | 63% | 48% | 1.32 | 0.54 |
| BRO Brown & Brown, Inc. | 78% | 69% | 1.13 | 0.66 |
| CRVL CorVel Corporation | 120% | 115% | 1.05 | 0.98 |
| WTW Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company | 68% | 73% | 0.93 | 0.61 |
| AON Aon plc | 79% | 89% | 0.89 | 0.78 |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 63% | 73% | 0.87 | 0.73 |
| AIG American International Group, Inc. | 64% | 93% | 0.68 | 0.91 |
| ACN Accenture plc | 117% | 186% | 0.63 | 1.12 |
What diversifies MRSH?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with MRSH's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing MRSH with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in MRSH into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+3.9% for MRSH alone, +8.6% for the mix).
- FIX made money in ten of the 12 calendar years in which MRSH lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and GLD have moved largely independently of MRSH over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.27 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which MRSH lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% MRSH and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +24.3% | 0.31 | −11.3% | −3.5% | −0.1% | −1.1% | −5.4% | −5.5% | −11.4% | −1.1% | −1.2% | −29.8% | −12.0% | −6.3% | 20.3% | +3.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.27 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +2.0% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 17.1% | +8.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.04 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +60.5% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −6.7% | +10.8% | −19.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 17.9% | +11.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.20 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +24.0% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +22.6% | +17.8% | — | — | — | 17.3% | +7.1% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.26 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.7% | +7.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.40 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | +21.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +18.0% | +40.1% | +33.8% | −14.8% | −18.2% | 18.9% | +8.1% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.29 | +109% | 0.90 | +32.7% | −14.2% | −11.1% | −4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.8% | +7.0% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.02 | +153% | 0.89 | +28.4% | −28.9% | −9.9% | −12.9% | +73.7% | −45.3% | +6.4% | +18.8% | +4.7% | +8.0% | −24.4% | +2.1% | 17.1% | +8.1% |
| EUFN InternationaliShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 0.48 | +133% | 0.89 | +65.8% | −8.8% | −23.1% | −4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.5% | +7.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +24.3% | 0.31 | −11.3% | −3.5% | −0.1% | −1.1% | −5.4% | −5.5% | −11.4% | −1.1% | −1.2% | −29.8% | −12.0% | −6.3% | 20.3% | +3.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.32 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | −4.4% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −5.8% | +18.7% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | 18.6% | +10.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.14 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +105% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −26.0% | −25.2% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −25.6% | 18.6% | +23.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.07 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | +17.8% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +38.9% | +20.1% | +40.0% | −9.4% | +73.7% | 19.1% | +19.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.48 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +62.9% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.2% | +64.9% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | 19.2% | +9.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.29 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.1% | +12.6% |
Common questions
What was MRSH's worst drawdown?
MRSH's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 67.5%, from October 2000 to March 2009. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were MRSH's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, MRSH's best year was 1999, when it returned 67.8%. Its worst was 2004, with a return of -29.8%.
Is there a better investment than MRSH?
Among MRSH's popular alternatives, TRV and CB earned more than MRSH over the past 5 years with similar volatility: TRV returned 22.4% a year at 22.3% volatility, against 4.4% a year at 20.9%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BRK-B (insurance) and SLF (life insurance) earned more than MRSH with less volatility over the past 5 years. BRK-B returned 13.4% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 4.4% a year at 20.9%.
Is MRSH more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. MRSH's volatility over the past 5 years was 20.9%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MRSH's return lands within 20.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is MRSH's Sharpe ratio?
MRSH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.31, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MRSH earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is MRSH with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, MRSH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.46 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MRSH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MRSH holding.
What are the best alternatives to MRSH?
Of the 14 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed MRSH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CRVL and TRV.
Did MRSH outperform the S&P 500?
MRSH finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 16 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -11.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did MRSH do in stock market crashes?
MRSH fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in six of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when MRSH fell 46.2% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies MRSH?
These had a low correlation with MRSH over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.27), SMH (correlation 0.04) and GLD (correlation 0.20); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.32), CLS (correlation -0.14) and FIX (correlation 0.07). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than MRSH's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of MRSH's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to MRSH
TRVTravelers Companies
AJGArthur J. Gallagher & Co.
CBChubb
AIGAmerican International Group
ACNAccenture
AONAon