Relative Intelligence · IT Services

How Accenture (ACN) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ACN alone. It places ACN (Accenture plc) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ACN stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ACN's full trading record, from July 2001 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, ACN rose 66.5% against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. That said, the slide is ACN's own: it is 36.8% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?ACN's 66.5% gain over the past 3 months far outran its industry: the IT services ETF VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) rose 6.3%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: ACN rose 29.5% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsACN has trailed the market, rising 2.2% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (13.6% against 89.3%). The last two calendar years both went the same way: ACN fell 22.1% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termACN turned $10,000 into $24,600 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 37.3% off ACN, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than IBM (International Business Machines, 16.7%) but less than CTSH (Cognizant Technology Solutions, 38.6%). ACN fell further than the S&P 500 in three of the last three sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (37.3% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, ACN has a correlation of 0.50 over 5 years, more closely than 72% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. ACN moves far less with the S&P 500 than it used to, with a correlation of 0.50 over the past 5 years against 0.84 in the 5 years before. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- MSFT (Microsoft), SAIC (Science Applications International) and IBM (International Business Machines) earned more than ACN with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 5.2% a year at 32.7%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- ADP (Automatic Data Processing, business services) and FFIV (F5, cybersecurity) earned more than ACN with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADP returned 9.0% a year at 22.9% volatility, against a loss of 5.2% a year at 32.7%.
- Whole market
- 1,650 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ACN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), MSFT (Microsoft) and VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF).
How much would $10,000 in ACN have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ACN over the past 25 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ACN over the same span and ACN's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in ACN at the end of September 2001 would have grown to $215,030 by September 2026, more than the $114,557 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ACN, and FFIV finished highest, at $959,412.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2001 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 331 of the 1,326 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ACN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- FFIV$959,412+9,494% total · +20.0% a year
- CTSH$706,732+6,967% total · +18.6% a year
- MSFT$328,610+3,186% total · +15.0% a year
- CTAS$263,571+2,536% total · +14.0% a year
- CACI$222,873+2,129% total · +13.2% a year
- ACN$215,030+2,050% total · +13.1% a year
- ORCL$137,478+1,275% total · +11.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$114,557+1,046% total · +10.2% a year
- SAP$113,867+1,039% total · +10.2% a year
- IBM$48,569+386% total · +6.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 3,106 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ACN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CACI$23,239+132% total · +18.4% a year
- IBM$20,049+100% total · +14.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- SAP$16,715+67.2% total · +10.8% a year
- SAIC$15,988+59.9% total · +9.8% a year
- EXLS$13,964+39.6% total · +6.9% a year
- NOW$10,768+7.7% total · +1.5% a year
- CRM$8,626−13.7% total · −2.9% a year
- ACN$6,304−37.0% total · −8.8% a year
ACN at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- ACN is still 36.8% below its all-time high.
- ACN's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 67.8%, from February 2025 to June 2026. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over 24 full calendar years, ACN's best was 2021, when it returned 60.7%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 34.8%. It lost money in six of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $146B
- Industry
- Information Technology Services
- Price history from
- July 2001
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +2.2%total return
- Past 3 years
- −13.6%−4.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- −23.6%−5.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +146%+9.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +60.7%2021
- Worst calendar year
- −34.8%2022
- Losing years
- 6 of 24full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 32.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.00return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −67.8%Feb 2025 to Jun 2026
- From its all-time high
- −36.8%below the peak
ACN against the whole market
Where ACN ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ACN rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ACN on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ACN stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ACN's 3-year return ranks in the bottom 17% of the 3,017 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ACN | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +2.2% | 1,902 of 3,287 | bottom 43% |
| 3-year return | −13.6% | 2,513 of 3,017 | bottom 18% |
| 5-year return | −23.6% | 2,060 of 2,893 | bottom 30% |
| 10-year return | +146% | 1,095 of 2,202 | top 50% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 32.7% | 974 of 2,893 | top 34% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.00 | 2,345 of 2,893 | bottom 20% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −67.8% | 1,209 of 2,187 | bottom 46% |
What has beaten ACN on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ACN sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ACN with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 706 stocks and 944 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ACN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 45% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half ACN's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 24% less than ACN's 32.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against -0.00 for ACN.
- Among ACN's popular alternatives, IBM, CACI and MSFT are in the region. IBM earned 16.6% a year against a loss of 5.2% a year for ACN, at 30.5% volatility, 7% less than ACN's 32.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ACN; faint dots are 88 more of the 1,650 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than ACN?
Investments that beat ACN over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ACN's popular alternatives, MSFT, SAIC and IBM earned more than ACN with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 5.2% a year at 32.7%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ADP (business services) and FFIV (cybersecurity) earned more than ACN with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADP returned 9.0% a year at 22.9% volatility, against a loss of 5.2% a year at 32.7%.
- Across the whole market, 1,650 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ACN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, MSFT and VTI.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ACN over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ACN's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ACN follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ACN's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ACN's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ACN's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ACN?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −5.2% | 32.7% | 0.00 | −67.8% | +146% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.50 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ACN. 10 of 21 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.67 | — | ||
SAICScience Applications International Corporation · Business Services | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.9% | 30.7% | 0.46 | −45.9% | +135% | 0.22 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +151% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 0.69 | — | ||
CACICACI International Inc · Business Services | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +16.6% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | +499% | 0.28 | — | |
EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc. · IT Services | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +10.6% | 32.6% | 0.47 | −51.3% | +327% | 0.67 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in IT Services and the categories next to it (Business Services, Enterprise Software, Software, E-Commerce), plus ACN's specific themes. 42 of 102 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.63 | — | ||
FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.34 | — | |
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.46 | 0.58% | |
DBXDropbox, Inc. · Application Software | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +3.9% | 34.4% | 0.29 | −62.6% | — | 0.42 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.55 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,169 of 3,511 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.12 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.03 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.39 | — | ||
RCBCRiver City Bank · Banks - Regional | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.6% | 27.2% | 0.64 | −45.5% | +345% | 0.14 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.11 | — | ||
EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.06 | 0.59% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.18 | 0.40% | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | −4.3% | 14.1% | -0.24 | −30.4% | — | 0.29 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for ACN
- Annual return
- ACN lost 5.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $7,640. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ACN's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.7%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ACN's return lands within 32.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ACN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.00, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ACN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ACN's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 67.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 67.8% fall takes a 210% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ACN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ACN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ACN holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,650 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ACN with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ACN | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.12 | — |
| 2 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.03 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.39 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.11 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.07 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.17 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.12 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +2.9% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | +366% | 0.52 | — | |
| 9 | RCBCRiver City Bank · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.6% | 27.2% | 0.64 | −45.5% | +345% | 0.14 | — |
| 10 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.23 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +12.0% | 25.4% | 0.58 | −55.2% | +240% | 0.30 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +2.2% | 29.4% | 0.23 | −50.4% | +307% | 0.21 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.00 | — | |
| 14 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +13.3% | 23.8% | 0.65 | −49.7% | — | 0.20 | — |
| 15 | Whole market | +6.1% | 27.5% | 0.35 | −42.0% | +63.3% | 0.26 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +2.6% | 30.6% | 0.24 | −43.2% | +306% | 0.48 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +2.5% | 22.1% | 0.23 | −36.9% | +281% | -0.05 | — | |
| 18 | EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.44 | — |
| 19 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.06 | 0.59% |
| 20 | Popular alternative | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.67 | — | |
| 21 | AIZAssurant, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −44.6% | +312% | 0.18 | — |
| 22 | SEICSEI Investments Company · Asset Management | Whole market | +12.7% | 22.3% | 0.65 | −51.8% | +168% | 0.52 | — |
| 23 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.24 | — |
| 24 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.18 | 0.40% | |
| 25 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | -0.03 | — |
| 26 | Whole market | +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +145% | 0.10 | — | |
| 27 | Same or nearby category | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.63 | — | |
| 28 | SJMThe J. M. Smucker Company · Packaged Foods | Whole market | +4.8% | 25.1% | 0.32 | −38.1% | +37.2% | 0.08 | — |
| 29 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.06 | 0.19% |
| 30 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.06 | 0.09% | |
| 31 | MSMMSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.1% | 0.63 | −48.2% | +184% | 0.21 | — |
| 32 | VOYAVoya Financial, Inc. · Retirement Services | Whole market | +8.8% | 28.9% | 0.44 | −52.1% | +253% | 0.20 | — |
| 33 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.47 | 0.04% | |
| 34 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.34 | — |
| 35 | SXTSensient Technologies Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +9.3% | 30.3% | 0.44 | −50.6% | +133% | 0.04 | — |
| 36 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.46 | 0.58% |
| 37 | CHEChemed Corporation · Health Care Services | Whole market | +3.4% | 25.3% | 0.26 | −42.9% | +273% | 0.36 | — |
| 38 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.13 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +13.1% | 21.5% | 0.68 | −32.7% | +413% | 0.46 | 0.18% | |
| 40 | HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +12.6% | 25.8% | 0.59 | −38.7% | +373% | 0.42 | 0.60% |
| 41 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.15 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | -0.09 | — | |
| 43 | OFGOFG Bancorp · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.5% | 28.7% | 0.77 | −61.2% | +580% | 0.18 | — |
| 44 | FBTFirst Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund · Healthcare | Whole market | +10.8% | 22.2% | 0.58 | −33.3% | +203% | 0.28 | 0.55% |
| 45 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.24 | — | |
| 46 | CNXNPC Connection, Inc. · Technology Distributors | Whole market | +15.8% | 29.2% | 0.65 | −41.8% | +277% | 0.37 | — |
| 47 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.15 | 0.20% |
| 48 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.05 | — | |
| 49 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.05 | — |
| 50 | ABMABM Industries Inc. · Specialty Business Services | Whole market | +5.0% | 31.0% | 0.31 | −52.0% | +66.3% | 0.15 | — |
| 51 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.45 | — | |
| 52 | HBTHBT Financial, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +18.9% | 28.7% | 0.75 | −54.0% | — | 0.24 | — |
| 53 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.18 | — |
| 54 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.38 | 0.61% |
| 55 | SAICScience Applications International Corporation · Business Services | Popular alternative | +9.9% | 30.7% | 0.46 | −45.9% | +135% | 0.22 | — |
| 56 | IOSPInnospec Inc. · Chemicals - Specialty | Whole market | +4.4% | 26.5% | 0.29 | −48.4% | +85.1% | 0.41 | — |
| 57 | BUGGlobal X - Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +7.1% | 30.4% | 0.38 | −41.7% | — | 0.37 | 0.50% |
| 58 | IGPTInvesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF · Technology | Whole market | +14.3% | 30.1% | 0.60 | −50.1% | +525% | 0.13 | 0.57% |
| 59 | Whole market | +6.5% | 20.9% | 0.41 | −34.4% | +156% | -0.04 | — | |
| 60 | SHOSunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. · REIT - Hotel & Motel | Whole market | +2.8% | 30.1% | 0.24 | −55.9% | +30.3% | 0.27 | — |
| 61 | SAFTSafety Insurance Group, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Whole market | +10.6% | 28.5% | 0.49 | −32.8% | +138% | 0.41 | — |
| 62 | Whole market | +6.1% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | +270% | 0.18 | — | |
| 63 | OEFiShares S&P 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.8% | 0.84 | −31.4% | +367% | 0.52 | 0.20% |
| 64 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.00 | — |
| 65 | WECWEC Energy Group, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.2% | 19.0% | 0.46 | −32.3% | +159% | 0.03 | — |
| 66 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.28 | 0.20% |
| 67 | AEEAmeren Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.9% | 19.4% | 0.49 | −29.1% | +192% | 0.01 | — |
| 68 | IHFiShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +3.1% | 19.3% | 0.26 | −35.2% | +171% | 0.21 | 0.37% |
| 69 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.48 | 0.03% | |
| 70 | RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +6.1% | 16.8% | 0.44 | −30.4% | +177% | 0.43 | 0.40% |
| 71 | CHDChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Whole market | +6.1% | 21.1% | 0.39 | −31.7% | +154% | 0.17 | — |
| 72 | HSTMHealthStream, Inc. · Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Whole market | +3.9% | 29.4% | 0.28 | −42.7% | +32.0% | 0.17 | — |
| 73 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.17 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.14 | — | |
| 75 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.38 | 0.60% |
| 76 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.30 | — | |
| 77 | FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +6.2% | 13.2% | 0.52 | −31.9% | +188% | 0.54 | 0.53% |
| 78 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.13 | — | |
| 79 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.13 | 0.48% |
| 80 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.26 | 0.40% |
| 81 | FTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.4% | 0.99 | −20.6% | +158% | 0.54 | 0.95% |
| 82 | PTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.5% | 11.8% | 0.83 | −26.6% | +188% | 0.38 | 0.60% |
| 83 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.17 | — | |
| 84 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.43 | 0.69% |
| 85 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.30 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.38 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.29 | 0.05% | |
| 88 | RLIRLI Corp. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +8.1% | 23.9% | 0.45 | −43.5% | +206% | 0.10 | — |
| 89 | NICNicolet Bankshares, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 30.1% | 0.73 | −44.3% | +344% | 0.10 | — |
| 90 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.12 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.50 | — | |
| 92 | AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +8.6% | 13.1% | 0.69 | −28.4% | +165% | 0.43 | 0.19% |
| 93 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +40.5% | 0.05 | 0.30% |
| 94 | CWBState Street SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF · Corporate Bonds | Whole market | +3.7% | 13.7% | 0.34 | −32.1% | +178% | 0.24 | 0.40% |
| 95 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.17 | — | |
| 96 | PWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.8% | 22.2% | 0.74 | −32.4% | +409% | 0.29 | 0.55% |
| 97 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.10 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.36 | 0.03% | |
| 99 | GLTRabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +14.9% | 24.6% | 0.69 | −37.9% | +191% | 0.18 | 0.60% |
| 100 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.15 | — |
ACN against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ACN, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ACN's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ACN, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Nine of the 21 popular alternatives, led by IBM, CACI and MSFT, were both more rewarding and calmer than ACN over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, ACN returned -5.2% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (32.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ACN with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | +16.6% | 30.5% |
| CACI CACI International Inc | +16.6% | 29.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| SAP SAP SE | +11.5% | 30.0% |
| EXLS ExlService Holdings, Inc. | +10.6% | 32.6% |
| SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | +9.9% | 30.7% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | +6.3% | 27.8% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | +1.9% | 45.5% |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | −1.3% | 30.2% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | −3.2% | 39.4% |
| G Genpact Limited | −3.9% | 30.3% |
| ACN This pageAccenture plc | −5.2% | 32.7% |
| HCKT The Hackett Group, Inc. | −8.7% | 35.0% |
| INFY Infosys Limited | −9.6% | 29.8% |
| WIT Wipro Limited | −14.8% | 33.2% |
| DXC DXC Technology Company | −15.9% | 47.2% |
| KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. | −19.4% | 58.1% |
| EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | −26.9% | 56.1% |
| TASK TaskUs, Inc. | −27.5% | 65.2% |
| CNXC Concentrix Corporation | −29.3% | 51.9% |
| GLOB Globant S.A. | −33.0% | 53.1% |
Has ACN consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ACN with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ACN helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Two of the 21 popular alternatives, MSFT and SAIC, outperformed ACN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- IBM, CACI and MSFT earned more for the risk they took than ACN (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- ORCL outperformed ACN over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so ACN has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ACN over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ACN Accenture plc (this page) | — | +29.5% | +66.5% | +25.1% | −4.8% | +2.2% | −13.6% | −23.6% | +146% | 32.7% | 0.00 | −67.8% | — | $146B | — |
| MSFT QualifiedMicrosoft Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| SAIC QualifiedScience Applications International Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | +1.6% | +20.3% | +43.5% | +35.3% | +37.6% | +27.6% | +60.1% | +135% | 30.7% | 0.46 | −45.9% | — | $5.7B | — |
| NOW Software - ApplicationServiceNow, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +8.6% | +42.8% | +50.0% | +1.4% | −18.5% | +37.8% | +9.8% | +848% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | — | $155B | — |
| CACI Information Technology ServicesCACI International Inc | 2/5 short3/3 long | −4.0% | +34.7% | +16.4% | +13.1% | +15.4% | +85.8% | +115% | +499% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | — | $13B | — |
| EXLS Information Technology ServicesExlService Holdings, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +15.9% | +44.9% | +28.5% | −0.8% | +0.4% | +52.7% | +65.2% | +327% | 32.6% | 0.47 | −51.3% | — | $6.2B | — |
| CRM Software - ApplicationSalesforce, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +2.5% | +39.7% | +30.7% | −3.8% | −3.9% | +21.3% | −14.8% | +240% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | — | $200B | — |
| SAP Software - ApplicationSAP SE | 2/5 short3/3 long | +9.4% | +44.6% | +29.6% | −2.1% | −16.6% | +81.3% | +72.6% | +205% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | — | $267B | — |
| ORCL Software - InfrastructureOracle Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | +300% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| LDOS Information Technology ServicesLeidos Holdings, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −0.4% | +19.7% | −17.0% | −29.8% | −32.2% | +42.4% | +35.6% | +253% | 27.8% | 0.36 | −49.5% | — | $16B | — |
| IBM Information Technology ServicesInternational Business Machines Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | +4.3% | +14.4% | −3.3% | −15.3% | −12.5% | +93.5% | +116% | +151% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | — | $228B | — |
| CTSH Information Technology ServicesCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 1/5 short2/3 long | +14.8% | +53.6% | +14.6% | −14.6% | +4.5% | +9.5% | −6.2% | +56.3% | 30.2% | 0.11 | −56.1% | — | $31B | — |
| G Information Technology ServicesGenpact Limited | 0/5 short2/3 long | +13.6% | +27.0% | +6.8% | −14.3% | −1.0% | +15.5% | −18.1% | +85.4% | 30.3% | 0.02 | −49.5% | — | $6.6B | — |
| TASK Information Technology ServicesTaskUs, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −2.7% | +44.7% | +16.5% | +13.2% | −4.3% | +44.9% | −79.9% | — | 65.2% | -0.17 | −91.6% | — | $772M | — |
| WIT Information Technology ServicesWipro Limited | 0/5 short1/3 long | +22.8% | +12.0% | −3.3% | −29.1% | −21.5% | −6.4% | −55.1% | +19.9% | 33.2% | -0.32 | −65.4% | — | $20B | — |
| KD Information Technology ServicesKyndryl Holdings, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +13.9% | +13.7% | −5.1% | −45.5% | −50.3% | −5.1% | −65.9% | — | 58.1% | -0.05 | −79.8% | — | $3.0B | — |
| DXC Information Technology ServicesDXC Technology Company | 3/5 short0/3 long | +34.3% | +56.8% | +9.9% | +3.9% | +12.6% | −28.0% | −58.0% | −67.7% | 47.2% | -0.13 | −92.0% | — | $2.3B | — |
| INFY Information Technology ServicesInfosys Limited | 0/5 short0/3 long | +16.3% | +11.9% | −9.0% | −28.7% | −22.4% | −18.0% | −39.8% | +110% | 29.8% | -0.19 | −54.4% | — | $52B | — |
| EPAM Information Technology ServicesEPAM Systems, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +15.5% | +46.2% | −0.9% | −34.8% | −9.9% | −41.5% | −79.2% | +103% | 56.1% | -0.26 | −89.4% | — | $6.7B | — |
| GLOB Information Technology ServicesGlobant S.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +16.2% | +29.0% | −17.7% | −34.0% | −28.3% | −76.9% | −86.5% | −5.9% | 53.1% | -0.48 | −92.2% | — | $1.8B | — |
| HCKT Information Technology ServicesThe Hackett Group, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +15.2% | +16.9% | −14.3% | −37.5% | −34.6% | −43.1% | −36.7% | −8.5% | 35.0% | -0.08 | −70.5% | — | $295M | — |
| CNXC Information Technology ServicesConcentrix Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +6.2% | +22.7% | −0.7% | −26.2% | −32.1% | −58.4% | −82.3% | — | 51.9% | -0.42 | −88.9% | — | $1.8B | — |
How did ACN do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2002, along with where ACN ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ACN and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- ACN finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 15 of its 24 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, NOW came out ahead of ACN most often, in nine of the 13 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ACN finished in the top quarter in three of 24 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 16 of 22.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ACN; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ACN among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ACN | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACN This pageAccenture plc | — | −22.1% | +1.9% | +33.6% | −34.8% | +60.7% | +26.0% | +51.2% | −6.2% | +33.3% | +14.3% | +20.8% | +11.4% | +26.6% | +27.7% | +12.0% | +19.1% | +29.0% | −7.5% | −1.4% | +29.3% | +8.3% | +2.6% | +46.3% | −33.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 24 | 16 of 22 | 17 of 22 | 8 of 22 | 15 of 22 | 5 of 20 | 9 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 11 of 19 | 7 of 19 | 7 of 19 | 11 of 19 | 10 of 18 | 12 of 17 | 5 of 15 | 2 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 12 of 15 | 3 of 15 | 9 of 14 | 5 of 12 | 4 of 12 | 10 of 11 | 4 of 11 | 8 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 24 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 16 of 24 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% | +60.5% | −44.4% | +20.8% | +15.8% | −1.0% | +9.2% | +6.2% | −22.0% |
| SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 4 of 12 | −8.7% | −9.0% | +13.6% | +34.9% | −10.2% | +10.8% | +39.1% | −15.5% | −8.2% | +89.5% | −5.3% | +54.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 9 of 13 | −27.8% | +50.0% | +82.0% | −40.2% | +17.9% | +95.0% | +58.6% | +36.5% | +75.4% | −14.1% | +27.6% | +21.2% | +86.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CACI CACI International Inc | 11 of 24 | +31.9% | +24.8% | +7.7% | +11.7% | +8.0% | −0.3% | +73.6% | +8.8% | +6.5% | +34.0% | +7.7% | +17.7% | +33.1% | −1.6% | +4.7% | +9.3% | +8.3% | +0.7% | −20.8% | −1.5% | −15.8% | +40.1% | +36.4% | −9.8% |
| EXLS ExlService Holdings, Inc. | 7 of 19 | −4.4% | +43.9% | −9.0% | +17.1% | +70.0% | +22.6% | +32.0% | −12.8% | +19.6% | +12.2% | +56.6% | +4.0% | +4.2% | +18.6% | +4.0% | +18.5% | +112% | −63.0% | +9.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 13 of 21 | −20.2% | +27.8% | +98.5% | −47.8% | +14.2% | +36.8% | +18.7% | +34.0% | +49.3% | −12.7% | +32.2% | +7.5% | +31.3% | +65.8% | −23.2% | +79.0% | +130% | −49.0% | +72.0% | +13.7% | +88.9% | — | — | — |
| SAP SAP SE | 8 of 24 | −0.4% | +61.3% | +52.3% | −24.2% | +9.2% | −1.3% | +36.4% | −10.0% | +31.7% | +11.1% | +15.3% | −18.6% | +10.0% | +55.8% | +6.0% | +9.8% | +31.4% | −28.0% | −2.6% | +18.7% | +2.8% | +7.0% | +114% | −38.7% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 12 of 24 | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% | +24.3% | +19.4% | −3.0% | +24.9% | +6.9% | −17.6% | +19.0% | +15.7% | +31.8% | −17.5% | +28.6% | +39.4% | −21.4% | +31.7% | +40.4% | −11.0% | +3.6% | +22.6% | −21.8% |
| LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 9 of 19 | +26.5% | +34.5% | +4.5% | +20.0% | −14.2% | +8.9% | +88.8% | −16.7% | +28.4% | +27.0% | +35.0% | −3.2% | +64.2% | −5.3% | −22.5% | −16.3% | −2.8% | −3.2% | +13.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 8 of 24 | +38.2% | +39.3% | +21.9% | +10.6% | +16.6% | −1.2% | +23.6% | −22.6% | −4.9% | +25.2% | −11.4% | −12.4% | −0.2% | +5.9% | +27.4% | +14.2% | +58.7% | −20.8% | +12.8% | +19.8% | −15.8% | +7.2% | +20.5% | −35.4% |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 11 of 24 | +9.7% | +3.5% | +34.4% | −34.5% | +9.6% | +33.9% | −1.1% | −9.7% | +27.6% | −6.7% | +14.0% | +4.3% | +36.7% | +14.8% | −12.2% | +61.7% | +151% | −46.8% | −12.0% | +53.4% | +18.9% | +85.3% | +89.7% | +75.8% |
| G Genpact Limited | 6 of 18 | +10.5% | +25.8% | −24.0% | −11.7% | +29.5% | −0.9% | +57.6% | −14.1% | +31.6% | −2.6% | +32.0% | +3.0% | +18.6% | +17.8% | −1.6% | +2.1% | +81.4% | −46.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TASK TaskUs, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −30.4% | +29.6% | −22.6% | −68.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WIT Wipro Limited | 11 of 24 | −16.6% | +27.7% | +20.0% | −51.9% | +73.1% | +50.9% | −1.7% | −5.8% | +13.2% | −15.2% | +3.7% | −9.5% | +68.0% | −3.9% | −26.1% | +23.9% | +195% | −40.5% | +2.9% | +49.3% | +2.8% | +77.0% | +45.3% | −7.7% |
| KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 4 | −23.2% | +66.5% | +86.9% | −38.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DXC DXC Technology Company | 10 of 24 | −26.7% | −12.6% | −13.7% | −17.7% | +25.0% | −30.1% | −27.9% | −43.5% | +85.7% | +84.0% | +24.9% | +14.5% | +41.7% | +73.4% | −51.1% | −12.8% | +63.7% | −29.0% | −7.3% | +5.4% | −10.2% | +27.5% | +28.4% | −29.6% |
| INFY Infosys Limited | 13 of 24 | −16.4% | +23.1% | +4.8% | −27.3% | +51.9% | +68.3% | +11.8% | +21.8% | +12.3% | −9.6% | +9.0% | +13.6% | +36.3% | −15.8% | −31.7% | +40.4% | +128% | −45.0% | −16.2% | +36.9% | +17.2% | +47.6% | +38.1% | +11.7% |
| EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | 9 of 13 | −12.4% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −51.0% | +86.5% | +68.9% | +82.9% | +8.0% | +67.0% | −18.2% | +64.6% | +36.7% | +93.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GLOB Globant S.A. | 6 of 11 | −69.5% | −9.9% | +41.5% | −46.5% | +44.3% | +105% | +88.3% | +21.2% | +39.3% | −11.1% | +140% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HCKT The Hackett Group, Inc. | 9 of 24 | −34.7% | +37.3% | +14.2% | +1.5% | +45.9% | −8.8% | +3.1% | +4.0% | −9.3% | +11.9% | +86.6% | +43.3% | +47.8% | +17.2% | +6.6% | +26.1% | −4.7% | −39.7% | +57.6% | −27.7% | −8.8% | −15.8% | +122% | −61.8% |
| CNXC Concentrix Corporation | 3 of 5 | −1.4% | −55.0% | −25.4% | −24.9% | +81.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How ACN has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ACN's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ACN's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2001, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ACN fell 67.8% from February 2025 to June 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 25.7%.
- The slowest recovery came after ACN fell 59.2% from March to October 2002; it did not regain that peak until January 2006, three years later.
- In three of ACN's five worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
Green means ACN fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ACN fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −67.8% | +25.7% | Feb 2025 | Jun 2026 | 16 months | Not yet | — |
| Dot-com bust | −59.2% | −30.3% | Mar 2002 | Oct 2002 | 7 months | Jan 2006 | 3.3 years |
| 2022 bear market | −39.7% | −17.2% | Dec 2021 | Mar 2023 | 15 months | Feb 2025 | 23 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −37.5% | −42.5% | Jul 2007 | Apr 2009 | 21 months | Dec 2009 | 8 months |
| Covid crash | −33.5% | −33.7% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jun 2020 | 3 months |
How did ACN do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ACN, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: ACN began trading on July 19, 2001, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, MSFT held up best, falling less than ACN in six of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- ACN began trading after the dot-com bust, but nine of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was CACI's 43.5%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
- ACN fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when ACN fell 37.3% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ACN.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACN This pageAccenture plc | — | −4.7% | −37.3% | −33.5% | −22.6% | −4.1% | −14.9% | −22.7% | −1.9% | −35.7% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 6 of 9 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 2 of 6 | −2.6% | −15.4% | −45.9% | −27.7% | −9.3% | −24.1% | — | — | — | — |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −7.2% | −39.9% | −28.8% | −20.6% | −8.5% | −47.6% | — | — | — | — |
| CACI CACI International Inc | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −18.9% | −41.4% | −26.0% | −3.0% | −21.9% | −24.0% | 0.0% | −30.0% | −43.5% |
| EXLS ExlService Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −5.4% | −21.3% | −46.2% | −26.4% | −5.6% | −13.3% | −18.9% | 0.0% | −80.9% | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −5.3% | −42.7% | −35.7% | −24.8% | −6.1% | −34.2% | −26.9% | −4.2% | −70.5% | — |
| SAP SAP SE | 4 of 9 | −2.0% | −41.9% | −32.6% | −25.0% | −6.9% | −13.3% | −25.0% | −1.4% | −49.6% | −87.9% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 3 of 9 | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −1.9% | −19.8% | −40.9% | −27.2% | −6.4% | −30.5% | −31.7% | 0.0% | −20.9% | — |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 3 of 9 | −2.0% | −16.7% | −37.3% | −29.1% | −6.3% | −23.3% | −14.6% | −1.5% | −44.3% | −58.3% |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 1 of 9 | −5.8% | −38.6% | −40.6% | −22.4% | −3.2% | −25.3% | −26.7% | −2.5% | −65.5% | −71.3% |
| G Genpact Limited | 3 of 9 | −4.9% | −28.0% | −48.4% | −15.9% | −5.6% | −9.9% | −22.3% | −2.9% | −61.7% | — |
| TASK TaskUs, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −11.5% | −72.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WIT Wipro Limited | 2 of 9 | −2.6% | −52.6% | −33.0% | −8.6% | −6.8% | −14.6% | −29.6% | −1.5% | −66.0% | — |
| KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.1% | −56.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DXC DXC Technology Company | 1 of 9 | −11.2% | −39.9% | −69.4% | −47.9% | −7.0% | −18.1% | −30.9% | −1.4% | −58.8% | −74.6% |
| INFY Infosys Limited | 3 of 9 | −4.9% | −35.9% | −39.1% | −12.7% | −3.6% | −17.3% | −25.9% | −0.6% | −60.9% | −90.0% |
| EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −8.5% | −71.8% | −33.3% | −23.1% | −7.8% | −29.6% | — | — | — | — |
| GLOB Globant S.A. | 1 of 6 | −9.3% | −40.5% | −45.5% | −20.4% | −4.9% | −38.5% | — | — | — | — |
| HCKT The Hackett Group, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −5.0% | −27.7% | −46.1% | −30.3% | −4.8% | −32.8% | −34.2% | 0.0% | −70.1% | −94.9% |
| CNXC Concentrix Corporation | 0 of 2 | −9.8% | −46.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does ACN move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ACN with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 11 of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ACN's 0.63, led by CACI, NOW and MSFT.
- CACI took just 62% of the S&P 500's losses, against 186% for ACN, while still keeping 94% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, ACN captured 117% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 186% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.12. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ACN's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACN This pageAccenture plc | 117% | 186% | 0.63 | 1.12 |
| CACI CACI International Inc | 94% | 62% | 1.50 | 0.79 |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 114% | 79% | 1.45 | 0.97 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 44% | 36% | 1.22 | 0.59 |
| LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 78% | 73% | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| EXLS ExlService Holdings, Inc. | 99% | 109% | 0.90 | 0.90 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 131% | 159% | 0.82 | 1.30 |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 115% | 143% | 0.80 | 1.16 |
| SAP SAP SE | 112% | 152% | 0.74 | 1.10 |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 89% | 121% | 0.73 | 0.95 |
| INFY Infosys Limited | 85% | 126% | 0.67 | 0.90 |
| G Genpact Limited | 90% | 146% | 0.61 | 0.99 |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 89% | 152% | 0.59 | 0.99 |
| EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | 156% | 263% | 0.59 | 1.41 |
| WIT Wipro Limited | 62% | 122% | 0.51 | 0.82 |
| GLOB Globant S.A. | 91% | 188% | 0.48 | 1.16 |
| HCKT The Hackett Group, Inc. | 51% | 119% | 0.43 | 0.85 |
| DXC DXC Technology Company | 99% | 276% | 0.36 | 1.59 |
What diversifies ACN?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ACN's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ACN with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ACN into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-8.8% for ACN alone, -1.4% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ACN over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.26 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in four of the six calendar years in which ACN lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ACN lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ACN and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2008 | 2007 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACN Accenture plc (this page) | 1.00 | −23.6% | 0.00 | −22.1% | −34.8% | −6.2% | −7.5% | −1.4% | −33.2% | 35.2% | −8.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.26 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | 28.7% | −3.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.13 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | 28.6% | −1.4% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.19 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | −8.7% | — | — | — | 28.9% | −3.3% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.33 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | −3.0% | — | — | — | 29.2% | −4.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.14 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | −9.1% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −47.0% | 29.9% | +0.8% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.32 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | −5.1% | −9.5% | — | — | — | 28.9% | −3.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.18 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | 29.0% | −2.9% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.15 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | — | — | 29.1% | −2.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2008 | 2007 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACN Accenture plc (this page) | 1.00 | −23.6% | 0.00 | −22.1% | −34.8% | −6.2% | −7.5% | −1.4% | −33.2% | 35.2% | −8.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.05 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −24.5% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −8.3% | 28.9% | +0.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.11 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −65.1% | 31.7% | +11.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.02 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +0.8% | −15.2% | +2.1% | −9.4% | 29.7% | +8.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.17 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −27.2% | 29.4% | 0.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.21 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | −8.2% | — | — | — | 30.2% | +2.2% |
Common questions
What was ACN's worst drawdown?
ACN's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 67.8%, from February 2025 to June 2026. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
What were ACN's best and worst years?
Over 24 full calendar years, ACN's best year was 2021, when it returned 60.7%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -34.8%.
Is there a better investment than ACN?
Among ACN's popular alternatives, MSFT, SAIC and IBM earned more than ACN with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 5.2% a year at 32.7%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ADP (business services) and FFIV (cybersecurity) earned more than ACN with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADP returned 9.0% a year at 22.9% volatility, against a loss of 5.2% a year at 32.7%.
Is ACN more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ACN's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.7%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ACN's return lands within 32.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ACN's Sharpe ratio?
ACN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.00, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ACN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ACN with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ACN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ACN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ACN holding.
What are the best alternatives to ACN?
Of the 21 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed ACN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: MSFT and SAIC.
Did ACN outperform the S&P 500?
ACN finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 15 of 24 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -22.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ACN do in stock market crashes?
ACN fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when ACN fell 37.3% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies ACN?
These had a low correlation with ACN over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.26), DXJ (correlation 0.13) and EMLP (correlation 0.19); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.05), CLS (correlation 0.11) and FIX (correlation 0.02). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ACN's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ACN's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to ACN
MSFTMicrosoft
NOWServiceNow
CRMSalesforce
SAPSAP
ORCLOracle
IBMInternational Business Machines
INFYInfosys