Relative Intelligence · IT Services

How Infosys (INFY) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on INFY alone. It places INFY (Infosys Limited) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where INFY stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: INFY's full trading record, from March 1999 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowThe slide is INFY's own: it is 45.0% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. Over the past 6 months, INFY fell 9.0% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?INFY's 11.9% gain over the past 3 months is part of a broader IT services rally: the IT services ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0%, with IBM (International Business Machines, up 14.4%) and ACN (Accenture, up 66.5%). INFY rose 16.3% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsINFY has gone against the market, falling 22.4% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (18.0% against 89.3%). INFY finished behind the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termINFY turned $10,000 into $21,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashINFY fell harder than the S&P 500 in six of seven sell-offs. The late-2018 sell-off was the exception: INFY fell 12.7%, less than the S&P 500's 19.3%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, INFY has a correlation of 0.51 over 5 years, more closely than 75% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, INFY's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.90: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 85% as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.3 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- MSFT (Microsoft) earned more than INFY with less volatility over the past 5 years: 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 9.6% a year at 29.8%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CTAS (Cintas, business services) and ADP (Automatic Data Processing, business services) earned more than INFY with less volatility over the past 5 years. CTAS returned 16.5% a year at 23.1% volatility, against a loss of 9.6% a year at 29.8%.
- Whole market
- 1,477 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than INFY with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), MSFT (Microsoft) and VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF).
How much would $10,000 in INFY have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in INFY over the past 27 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of INFY over the same span and INFY's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in INFY at the end of September 1999 would have grown to $78,543 by September 2026, less than the $95,018 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of INFY, and CTSH finished highest, at $1,001,146.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1999 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 702 of the 1,166 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of INFY; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CTSH$1M+9,911% total · +18.6% a year
- AMZN$622,861+6,129% total · +16.5% a year
- CACI$571,383+5,614% total · +16.2% a year
- MSFT$185,654+1,757% total · +11.4% a year
- ORCL$151,984+1,420% total · +10.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$95,018+850% total · +8.7% a year
- SAP$78,616+686% total · +7.9% a year
- INFY$78,543+685% total · +7.9% a year
- IBM$37,218+272% total · +5.0% a year
- DXC$5,016−49.8% total · −2.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 3,184 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of INFY; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CACI$23,239+132% total · +18.4% a year
- IBM$20,049+100% total · +14.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- SAP$16,715+67.2% total · +10.8% a year
- SAIC$15,988+59.9% total · +9.8% a year
- EXLS$13,964+39.6% total · +6.9% a year
- CRM$8,626−13.7% total · −2.9% a year
- ACN$6,304−37.0% total · −8.8% a year
- INFY$5,552−44.5% total · −11.1% a year
INFY at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- INFY is still 45.0% below its all-time high.
- INFY's deepest decline since it began trading in 1999 was 90.4%, from March 2000 to September 2001. It took about 13 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 26 full calendar years, INFY's best was 2009, when it returned 128%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 45.0%. It lost money in nine of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $52B
- Industry
- Information Technology Services
- Price history from
- March 1999
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −22.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- −18.0%−6.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- −39.8%−9.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +110%+7.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +128%2009
- Worst calendar year
- −45.0%2008
- Losing years
- 9 of 26full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 29.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- -0.19return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −90.4%Mar 2000 to Sep 2001
- From its all-time high
- −45.0%below the peak
INFY against the whole market
Where INFY ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does INFY rank among all stocks?
This section ranks INFY on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how INFY stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), INFY ranks in the bottom 8% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
- INFY is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 24% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | INFY | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −22.4% | 2,702 of 3,287 | bottom 19% |
| 3-year return | −18.0% | 2,563 of 3,017 | bottom 16% |
| 5-year return | −39.8% | 2,275 of 2,893 | bottom 22% |
| 10-year return | +110% | 1,291 of 2,202 | bottom 42% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 29.8% | 700 of 2,893 | top 24% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | -0.19 | 2,671 of 2,893 | bottom 9% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −54.4% | 644 of 2,187 | top 29% |
What has beaten INFY on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). INFY sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than INFY with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 538 stocks and 939 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than INFY over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 41% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half INFY's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 17% less than INFY's 29.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against -0.19 for INFY.
- Among INFY's popular alternatives, MSFT and LDOS are in the region. MSFT earned 12.5% a year against a loss of 9.6% a year for INFY, at 28.2% volatility, 5% less than INFY's 29.8%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to INFY; faint dots are 92 more of the 1,477 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than INFY?
Investments that beat INFY over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among INFY's popular alternatives, MSFT earned more than INFY with less volatility over the past 5 years: 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 9.6% a year at 29.8%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CTAS (business services) and ADP (business services) earned more than INFY with less volatility over the past 5 years. CTAS returned 16.5% a year at 23.1% volatility, against a loss of 9.6% a year at 29.8%.
- Across the whole market, 1,477 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than INFY with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, MSFT and VTI.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat INFY over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks INFY's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than INFY follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than INFY's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× INFY's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than INFY's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with INFY?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −9.6% | 29.8% | -0.19 | −54.4% | +110% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.51 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against INFY. 13 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +151% | 0.43 | — | ||
CACICACI International Inc · Business Services | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.6% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | +499% | 0.29 | — | |
SAICScience Applications International Corporation · Business Services | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.9% | 30.7% | 0.46 | −45.9% | +135% | 0.22 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | −5.2% | 32.7% | 0.00 | −67.8% | +146% | 0.79 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in IT Services and the categories next to it (Business Services, Enterprise Software, Software, E-Commerce), plus INFY's specific themes. 43 of 98 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.58 | — | ||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.44 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +1.5% | 25.0% | 0.19 | −45.0% | +173% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +7.0% | 24.1% | 0.40 | −49.9% | +167% | 0.39 | — | ||
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF · Software | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +4.4% | 28.9% | 0.29 | −45.9% | +383% | 0.48 | 0.38% | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,257 of 3,516 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +145% | 0.08 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.15 | 0.09% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | -0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.15 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.28 | — | ||
JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.20 | 0.20% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.27 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for INFY
- Annual return
- INFY lost 9.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $6,020. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- INFY's volatility over the past 5 years was 29.8%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, INFY's return lands within 29.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- INFY's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.19, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so INFY earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- INFY's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 54.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 54.4% fall takes a 119% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, INFY's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.51 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against INFY instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a INFY holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,477 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than INFY with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with INFY | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.17 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +145% | 0.08 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.15 | 0.09% | |
| 4 | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | -0.02 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.15 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.28 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.26 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.08 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +7.5% | 18.0% | 0.50 | −37.4% | +132% | 0.13 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.03 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.18 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +114% | 0.09 | — | |
| 13 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.20 | 0.20% |
| 14 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.46 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +6.5% | 20.9% | 0.41 | −34.4% | +156% | 0.00 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +6.1% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | +270% | 0.26 | — | |
| 17 | WECWEC Energy Group, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.2% | 19.0% | 0.46 | −32.3% | +159% | 0.10 | — |
| 18 | AEEAmeren Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.9% | 19.4% | 0.49 | −29.1% | +192% | 0.07 | — |
| 19 | FEFirstEnergy Corp. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.5% | 19.4% | 0.52 | −47.7% | +111% | 0.24 | — |
| 20 | XLUState Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF · Utilities Equity | Whole market | +7.8% | 17.4% | 0.52 | −36.0% | +138% | 0.15 | 0.08% |
| 21 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.50 | 0.03% | |
| 22 | CHDChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Whole market | +6.1% | 21.1% | 0.39 | −31.7% | +154% | 0.13 | — |
| 23 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.51 | 0.03% | |
| 24 | LNTAlliant Energy Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.3% | 19.8% | 0.46 | −33.5% | +150% | 0.08 | — |
| 25 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.25 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.37 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.37 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.21 | — | |
| 29 | IDAIDACORP, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.8% | 19.2% | 0.54 | −34.3% | +141% | 0.08 | — |
| 30 | SPLVInvesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF · US Low-Volatility Equity | Whole market | +5.5% | 12.6% | 0.49 | −36.3% | +129% | 0.36 | 0.25% |
| 31 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.09 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.40 | — | |
| 33 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.17 | 0.48% |
| 34 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.26 | 0.40% |
| 35 | PTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.5% | 11.8% | 0.83 | −26.6% | +188% | 0.35 | 0.60% |
| 36 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.45 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.31 | 0.05% | |
| 38 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.46 | 0.69% |
| 39 | AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +6.4% | 10.7% | 0.64 | −23.0% | +118% | 0.45 | 0.20% |
| 40 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.40 | 0.18% | |
| 41 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.46 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.13 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.40 | — | |
| 44 | ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF · International | Whole market | +6.3% | 10.3% | 0.65 | −28.8% | +116% | 0.52 | 0.20% |
| 45 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.24 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.03 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.17 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.43 | 0.03% | |
| 49 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +40.5% | 0.10 | 0.30% |
| 50 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.27 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.29 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.34 | 0.03% | |
| 53 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.18 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.32 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.19 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.39 | 0.09% | |
| 57 | AWRAmerican States Water Company · Regulated Water | Whole market | +0.6% | 22.7% | 0.14 | −32.8% | +168% | 0.47 | — |
| 58 | Whole market | +4.0% | 26.6% | 0.28 | −49.0% | +282% | 0.37 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.15 | — | |
| 60 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.32 | 0.60% |
| 61 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.22 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.26 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +198% | 0.44 | 0.03% | |
| 64 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.52 | 0.04% | |
| 65 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.22 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.18 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +5.0% | 27.0% | 0.32 | −36.8% | +129% | 0.32 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.37 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +2.9% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | +366% | 0.45 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.47 | 0.06% | |
| 71 | Whole market | −0.4% | 6.1% | -0.03 | −18.6% | +13.2% | 0.32 | 0.03% | |
| 72 | Whole market | +9.8% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | +60.7% | 0.26 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.30 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.33 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.94 | −6.3% | +32.7% | 0.19 | 0.03% | |
| 76 | FXUFirst Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund · Utilities | Whole market | +11.2% | 16.6% | 0.72 | −34.8% | +138% | 0.16 | 0.61% |
| 77 | Whole market | +7.1% | 22.9% | 0.42 | −38.7% | +295% | 0.42 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +6.2% | 20.6% | 0.40 | −42.0% | +179% | 0.42 | 0.03% | |
| 79 | Whole market | +7.1% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | +313% | 0.57 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.10 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +11.1% | 24.2% | 0.56 | −36.7% | +204% | 0.27 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.45 | 0.06% | |
| 83 | Whole market | +6.8% | 19.4% | 0.44 | −38.7% | +122% | 0.13 | 0.09% | |
| 84 | Whole market | +5.2% | 17.5% | 0.38 | −36.4% | +102% | 0.18 | 0.06% | |
| 85 | Whole market | +5.2% | 8.9% | 0.61 | −25.4% | +37.8% | 0.11 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.31 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +2.7% | 22.9% | 0.23 | −41.2% | +55.8% | 0.17 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.9% | 0.56 | −44.1% | +103% | 0.22 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +5.5% | 21.5% | 0.36 | −30.1% | +89.8% | 0.15 | — | |
| 90 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.49 | 0.79% |
| 91 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.1% | 0.57 | −39.0% | +211% | 0.46 | 0.20% | |
| 92 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.29 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +11.8% | 22.6% | 0.61 | −39.2% | +118% | 0.26 | — | |
| 94 | FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.48 | −13.5% | +35.9% | 0.08 | 0.15% |
| 95 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.47 | 0.85% |
| 96 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.02 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +5.5% | 24.9% | 0.34 | −47.7% | +74.8% | 0.30 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.07 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.13 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +1.7% | 2.8% | 0.63 | −8.5% | +20.5% | 0.27 | 0.03% |
INFY against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against INFY, compared period by period and year by year.
How do INFY's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at INFY, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only MSFT and LDOS were both more rewarding and calmer than INFY over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, INFY returned -9.6% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (29.8% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than INFY with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | +16.6% | 30.5% |
| CACI CACI International Inc | +16.6% | 29.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| SAP SAP SE | +11.5% | 30.0% |
| EXLS ExlService Holdings, Inc. | +10.6% | 32.6% |
| SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | +9.9% | 30.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | +6.3% | 27.8% |
| BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | +0.4% | 32.6% |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | −1.3% | 30.2% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | −3.2% | 39.4% |
| G Genpact Limited | −3.9% | 30.3% |
| ACN Accenture plc | −5.2% | 32.7% |
| INFY This pageInfosys Limited | −9.6% | 29.8% |
| WIT Wipro Limited | −14.8% | 33.2% |
| DXC DXC Technology Company | −15.9% | 47.2% |
| KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. | −19.4% | 58.1% |
| EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | −26.9% | 56.1% |
| GLOB Globant S.A. | −33.0% | 53.1% |
Has INFY consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares INFY with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than INFY helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- 12 of the 19 popular alternatives, led by ACN, MSFT and CACI, outperformed INFY in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- ACN, MSFT and CACI outperformed INFY in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- IBM, CACI and MSFT earned more for the risk they took than INFY (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than INFY over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| INFY Infosys Limited (this page) | — | +16.3% | +11.9% | −9.0% | −28.7% | −22.4% | −18.0% | −39.8% | +110% | 29.8% | -0.19 | −54.4% | — | $52B | — |
| ACN QualifiedAccenture plc | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +29.5% | +66.5% | +25.1% | −4.8% | +2.2% | −13.6% | −23.6% | +146% | 32.7% | 0.00 | −67.8% | — | $146B | — |
| MSFT QualifiedMicrosoft Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| CACI QualifiedCACI International Inc | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.0% | +34.7% | +16.4% | +13.1% | +15.4% | +85.8% | +115% | +499% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | — | $13B | — |
| EXLS QualifiedExlService Holdings, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +15.9% | +44.9% | +28.5% | −0.8% | +0.4% | +52.7% | +65.2% | +327% | 32.6% | 0.47 | −51.3% | — | $6.2B | — |
| CRM QualifiedSalesforce, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +2.5% | +39.7% | +30.7% | −3.8% | −3.9% | +21.3% | −14.8% | +240% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | — | $200B | — |
| SAP QualifiedSAP SE | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +9.4% | +44.6% | +29.6% | −2.1% | −16.6% | +81.3% | +72.6% | +205% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | — | $267B | — |
| IBM QualifiedInternational Business Machines Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +4.3% | +14.4% | −3.3% | −15.3% | −12.5% | +93.5% | +116% | +151% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | — | $228B | — |
| SAIC QualifiedScience Applications International Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +1.6% | +20.3% | +43.5% | +35.3% | +37.6% | +27.6% | +60.1% | +135% | 30.7% | 0.46 | −45.9% | — | $5.7B | — |
| AMZN QualifiedAmazon.com, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| G QualifiedGenpact Limited | 4/5 short2/3 long | +13.6% | +27.0% | +6.8% | −14.3% | −1.0% | +15.5% | −18.1% | +85.4% | 30.3% | 0.02 | −49.5% | — | $6.6B | — |
| CTSH QualifiedCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 4/5 short2/3 long | +14.8% | +53.6% | +14.6% | −14.6% | +4.5% | +9.5% | −6.2% | +56.3% | 30.2% | 0.11 | −56.1% | — | $31B | — |
| BAH QualifiedBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | −3.1% | +17.1% | −5.7% | −9.7% | −23.5% | −34.5% | +2.0% | +197% | 32.6% | 0.18 | −66.6% | — | $9.0B | — |
| LDOS Information Technology ServicesLeidos Holdings, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −0.4% | +19.7% | −17.0% | −29.8% | −32.2% | +42.4% | +35.6% | +253% | 27.8% | 0.36 | −49.5% | — | $16B | — |
| ORCL Software - InfrastructureOracle Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | +300% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| WIT Information Technology ServicesWipro Limited | 3/5 short1/3 long | +22.8% | +12.0% | −3.3% | −29.1% | −21.5% | −6.4% | −55.1% | +19.9% | 33.2% | -0.32 | −65.4% | — | $20B | — |
| KD Information Technology ServicesKyndryl Holdings, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +13.9% | +13.7% | −5.1% | −45.5% | −50.3% | −5.1% | −65.9% | — | 58.1% | -0.05 | −79.8% | — | $3.0B | — |
| DXC Information Technology ServicesDXC Technology Company | 5/5 short0/3 long | +34.3% | +56.8% | +9.9% | +3.9% | +12.6% | −28.0% | −58.0% | −67.7% | 47.2% | -0.13 | −92.0% | — | $2.3B | — |
| EPAM Information Technology ServicesEPAM Systems, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +15.5% | +46.2% | −0.9% | −34.8% | −9.9% | −41.5% | −79.2% | +103% | 56.1% | -0.26 | −89.4% | — | $6.7B | — |
| GLOB Information Technology ServicesGlobant S.A. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +16.2% | +29.0% | −17.7% | −34.0% | −28.3% | −76.9% | −86.5% | −5.9% | 53.1% | -0.48 | −92.2% | — | $1.8B | — |
How did INFY do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2000, along with where INFY ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with INFY and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- INFY finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 12 of its 26 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last four.
- Among its popular alternatives, AMZN came out ahead of INFY most often, in 17 of the 26 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, INFY finished in the top quarter in six of 26 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 13 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of INFY; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places INFY among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of INFY | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFY This pageInfosys Limited | — | −16.4% | +23.1% | +4.8% | −27.3% | +51.9% | +68.3% | +11.8% | +21.8% | +12.3% | −9.6% | +9.0% | +13.6% | +36.3% | −15.8% | −31.7% | +40.4% | +128% | −45.0% | −16.2% | +36.9% | +17.2% | +47.6% | +38.1% | +11.7% | −31.8% | −44.3% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 26 | 13 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 15 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 6 of 19 | 4 of 19 | 16 of 19 | 3 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 14 of 19 | 8 of 18 | 9 of 17 | 16 of 16 | 15 of 16 | 3 of 15 | 5 of 15 | 11 of 15 | 13 of 14 | 4 of 12 | 3 of 12 | 3 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 9 of 10 | 7 of 9 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 13 of 26 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% |
| ACN Accenture plc | 11 of 24 | −22.1% | +1.9% | +33.6% | −34.8% | +60.7% | +26.0% | +51.2% | −6.2% | +33.3% | +14.3% | +20.8% | +11.4% | +26.6% | +27.7% | +12.0% | +19.1% | +29.0% | −7.5% | −1.4% | +29.3% | +8.3% | +2.6% | +46.3% | −33.2% | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 12 of 26 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% | +60.5% | −44.4% | +20.8% | +15.8% | −1.0% | +9.2% | +6.2% | −22.0% | +52.8% | −62.9% |
| CACI CACI International Inc | 12 of 26 | +31.9% | +24.8% | +7.7% | +11.7% | +8.0% | −0.3% | +73.6% | +8.8% | +6.5% | +34.0% | +7.7% | +17.7% | +33.1% | −1.6% | +4.7% | +9.3% | +8.3% | +0.7% | −20.8% | −1.5% | −15.8% | +40.1% | +36.4% | −9.8% | +243% | +1.8% |
| EXLS ExlService Holdings, Inc. | 11 of 19 | −4.4% | +43.9% | −9.0% | +17.1% | +70.0% | +22.6% | +32.0% | −12.8% | +19.6% | +12.2% | +56.6% | +4.0% | +4.2% | +18.6% | +4.0% | +18.5% | +112% | −63.0% | +9.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 11 of 21 | −20.2% | +27.8% | +98.5% | −47.8% | +14.2% | +36.8% | +18.7% | +34.0% | +49.3% | −12.7% | +32.2% | +7.5% | +31.3% | +65.8% | −23.2% | +79.0% | +130% | −49.0% | +72.0% | +13.7% | +88.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SAP SAP SE | 15 of 26 | −0.4% | +61.3% | +52.3% | −24.2% | +9.2% | −1.3% | +36.4% | −10.0% | +31.7% | +11.1% | +15.3% | −18.6% | +10.0% | +55.8% | +6.0% | +9.8% | +31.4% | −28.0% | −2.6% | +18.7% | +2.8% | +7.0% | +114% | −38.7% | −4.9% | −35.1% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 12 of 26 | +38.2% | +39.3% | +21.9% | +10.6% | +16.6% | −1.2% | +23.6% | −22.6% | −4.9% | +25.2% | −11.4% | −12.4% | −0.2% | +5.9% | +27.4% | +14.2% | +58.7% | −20.8% | +12.8% | +19.8% | −15.8% | +7.2% | +20.5% | −35.4% | +43.1% | −20.8% |
| SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 6 of 12 | −8.7% | −9.0% | +13.6% | +34.9% | −10.2% | +10.8% | +39.1% | −15.5% | −8.2% | +89.5% | −5.3% | +54.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 17 of 26 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% | −16.0% | +178% | +74.6% | −30.5% | −79.6% |
| G Genpact Limited | 9 of 18 | +10.5% | +25.8% | −24.0% | −11.7% | +29.5% | −0.9% | +57.6% | −14.1% | +31.6% | −2.6% | +32.0% | +3.0% | +18.6% | +17.8% | −1.6% | +2.1% | +81.4% | −46.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 17 of 26 | +9.7% | +3.5% | +34.4% | −34.5% | +9.6% | +33.9% | −1.1% | −9.7% | +27.6% | −6.7% | +14.0% | +4.3% | +36.7% | +14.8% | −12.2% | +61.7% | +151% | −46.8% | −12.0% | +53.4% | +18.9% | +85.3% | +89.7% | +75.8% | +13.7% | −34.2% |
| BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 9 of 15 | −33.0% | +2.0% | +24.5% | +25.7% | −1.0% | +24.4% | +60.2% | +20.2% | +7.8% | +19.3% | +18.5% | +56.3% | +49.0% | +40.0% | −11.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 12 of 19 | +26.5% | +34.5% | +4.5% | +20.0% | −14.2% | +8.9% | +88.8% | −16.7% | +28.4% | +27.0% | +35.0% | −3.2% | +64.2% | −5.3% | −22.5% | −16.3% | −2.8% | −3.2% | +13.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 14 of 26 | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% | +24.3% | +19.4% | −3.0% | +24.9% | +6.9% | −17.6% | +19.0% | +15.7% | +31.8% | −17.5% | +28.6% | +39.4% | −21.4% | +31.7% | +40.4% | −11.0% | +3.6% | +22.6% | −21.8% | −52.5% | +3.7% |
| WIT Wipro Limited | 14 of 25 | −16.6% | +27.7% | +20.0% | −51.9% | +73.1% | +50.9% | −1.7% | −5.8% | +13.2% | −15.2% | +3.7% | −9.5% | +68.0% | −3.9% | −26.1% | +23.9% | +195% | −40.5% | +2.9% | +49.3% | +2.8% | +77.0% | +45.3% | −7.7% | −27.0% | — |
| KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 4 | −23.2% | +66.5% | +86.9% | −38.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DXC DXC Technology Company | 11 of 26 | −26.7% | −12.6% | −13.7% | −17.7% | +25.0% | −30.1% | −27.9% | −43.5% | +85.7% | +84.0% | +24.9% | +14.5% | +41.7% | +73.4% | −51.1% | −12.8% | +63.7% | −29.0% | −7.3% | +5.4% | −10.2% | +27.5% | +28.4% | −29.6% | −18.5% | −36.4% |
| EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | 7 of 13 | −12.4% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −51.0% | +86.5% | +68.9% | +82.9% | +8.0% | +67.0% | −18.2% | +64.6% | +36.7% | +93.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GLOB Globant S.A. | 5 of 11 | −69.5% | −9.9% | +41.5% | −46.5% | +44.3% | +105% | +88.3% | +21.2% | +39.3% | −11.1% | +140% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How INFY has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were INFY's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents INFY's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1999, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of INFY's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: INFY fell 54.4% from January 2022 to June 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 70.8%.
- The slowest recovery came after INFY fell 90.4% from March 2000 to September 2001; it did not regain that peak until February 2015, 13 years later.
Green means INFY fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | INFY fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −90.4% | −25.4% | Mar 2000 | Sep 2001 | 18 months | Feb 2015 | 13.4 years |
| 2022 bear market | −54.4% | +70.8% | Jan 2022 | Jun 2026 | 4.4 years | Not yet | — |
| Covid crash | −41.7% | −22.0% | Sep 2019 | Mar 2020 | 6 months | Jul 2020 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −33.5% | −5.0% | Jul 1999 | Jul 1999 | Under a month | Sep 1999 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −30.6% | +11.3% | Apr 2016 | Feb 2017 | 10 months | Jun 2018 | 16 months |
How did INFY do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far INFY, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- INFY fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when INFY fell 90.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, MSFT held up best, falling less than INFY in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than INFY.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFY This pageInfosys Limited | — | −4.9% | −35.9% | −39.1% | −12.7% | −3.6% | −17.3% | −25.9% | −0.6% | −60.9% | −90.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ACN Accenture plc | 4 of 9 | −4.7% | −37.3% | −33.5% | −22.6% | −4.1% | −14.9% | −22.7% | −1.9% | −35.7% | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 7 of 10 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| CACI CACI International Inc | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −18.9% | −41.4% | −26.0% | −3.0% | −21.9% | −24.0% | 0.0% | −30.0% | −43.5% |
| EXLS ExlService Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −5.4% | −21.3% | −46.2% | −26.4% | −5.6% | −13.3% | −18.9% | 0.0% | −80.9% | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −5.3% | −42.7% | −35.7% | −24.8% | −6.1% | −34.2% | −26.9% | −4.2% | −70.5% | — |
| SAP SAP SE | 6 of 10 | −2.0% | −41.9% | −32.6% | −25.0% | −6.9% | −13.3% | −25.0% | −1.4% | −49.6% | −87.9% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 6 of 10 | −2.0% | −16.7% | −37.3% | −29.1% | −6.3% | −23.3% | −14.6% | −1.5% | −44.3% | −58.3% |
| SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 2 of 6 | −2.6% | −15.4% | −45.9% | −27.7% | −9.3% | −24.1% | — | — | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| G Genpact Limited | 3 of 9 | −4.9% | −28.0% | −48.4% | −15.9% | −5.6% | −9.9% | −22.3% | −2.9% | −61.7% | — |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 1 of 10 | −5.8% | −38.6% | −40.6% | −22.4% | −3.2% | −25.3% | −26.7% | −2.5% | −65.5% | −71.3% |
| BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 3 of 7 | −3.0% | −21.5% | −25.5% | −17.6% | −7.1% | −17.1% | −29.0% | — | — | — |
| LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −1.9% | −19.8% | −40.9% | −27.2% | −6.4% | −30.5% | −31.7% | 0.0% | −20.9% | — |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 6 of 10 | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| WIT Wipro Limited | 4 of 9 | −2.6% | −52.6% | −33.0% | −8.6% | −6.8% | −14.6% | −29.6% | −1.5% | −66.0% | — |
| KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.1% | −56.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DXC DXC Technology Company | 2 of 10 | −11.2% | −39.9% | −69.4% | −47.9% | −7.0% | −18.1% | −30.9% | −1.4% | −58.8% | −74.6% |
| EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −8.5% | −71.8% | −33.3% | −23.1% | −7.8% | −29.6% | — | — | — | — |
| GLOB Globant S.A. | 0 of 6 | −9.3% | −40.5% | −45.5% | −20.4% | −4.9% | −38.5% | — | — | — | — |
How closely does INFY move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares INFY with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 11 of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than INFY's 0.67, led by CACI, MSFT and SAIC.
- CACI took just 62% of the S&P 500's losses, against 126% for INFY, while still keeping 94% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, INFY captured 85% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 126% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.90. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than INFY's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFY This pageInfosys Limited | 85% | 126% | 0.67 | 0.90 |
| CACI CACI International Inc | 94% | 62% | 1.50 | 0.79 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 44% | 36% | 1.22 | 0.59 |
| LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 78% | 73% | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 65% | 63% | 1.03 | 0.54 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| EXLS ExlService Holdings, Inc. | 99% | 109% | 0.90 | 0.90 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 131% | 159% | 0.82 | 1.30 |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 115% | 143% | 0.80 | 1.16 |
| SAP SAP SE | 112% | 152% | 0.74 | 1.10 |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 89% | 121% | 0.73 | 0.95 |
| ACN Accenture plc | 117% | 186% | 0.63 | 1.12 |
| G Genpact Limited | 90% | 146% | 0.61 | 0.99 |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 89% | 152% | 0.59 | 0.99 |
| EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | 156% | 263% | 0.59 | 1.41 |
| WIT Wipro Limited | 62% | 122% | 0.51 | 0.82 |
| GLOB Globant S.A. | 91% | 188% | 0.48 | 1.16 |
| DXC DXC Technology Company | 99% | 276% | 0.36 | 1.59 |
What diversifies INFY?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with INFY's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing INFY with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in INFY into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-11.1% for INFY alone, -5.5% for the mix).
- MCK made money in seven of the nine calendar years in which INFY lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of INFY over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.26 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which INFY lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% INFY and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2016 | 2012 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFY Infosys Limited (this page) | 1.00 | −39.8% | -0.19 | −16.4% | −27.3% | −9.6% | −15.8% | −31.7% | −45.0% | −16.2% | −31.8% | −44.3% | 27.2% | −11.1% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.26 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.3% | −5.5% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.17 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | +1.1% | +19.6% | −16.1% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | 22.3% | −3.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.26 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | +29.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.7% | −5.7% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.37 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | +15.9% | +9.6% | — | — | — | — | — | 22.9% | −6.3% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.21 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | +35.6% | +8.6% | +6.8% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −14.6% | — | 24.2% | −1.7% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.33 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | −5.1% | +6.3% | +20.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 22.6% | −6.1% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.10 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | +8.0% | +6.6% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | — | 22.4% | −5.1% |
| FFLC Broad MarketFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 0.42 | +107% | 0.95 | +17.7% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.3% | −5.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2016 | 2012 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFY Infosys Limited (this page) | 1.00 | −39.8% | -0.19 | −16.4% | −27.3% | −9.6% | −15.8% | −31.7% | −45.0% | −16.2% | −31.8% | −44.3% | 27.2% | −11.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.18 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −17.5% | +3.8% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −2.5% | +108% | 23.3% | −1.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.19 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | +7.4% | +11.2% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 26.6% | +8.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.06 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +18.3% | +15.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 24.1% | +5.7% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.24 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.3% | +25.6% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 23.5% | −2.5% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.14 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | +0.7% | +94.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 23.5% | −0.1% |
Common questions
What was INFY's worst drawdown?
INFY's deepest decline since it began trading in 1999 was 90.4%, from March 2000 to September 2001. It took about 13 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were INFY's best and worst years?
Over 26 full calendar years, INFY's best year was 2009, when it returned 128%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -45.0%.
Is there a better investment than INFY?
Among INFY's popular alternatives, MSFT earned more than INFY with less volatility over the past 5 years: 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against a loss of 9.6% a year at 29.8%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CTAS (business services) and ADP (business services) earned more than INFY with less volatility over the past 5 years. CTAS returned 16.5% a year at 23.1% volatility, against a loss of 9.6% a year at 29.8%.
Is INFY more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. INFY's volatility over the past 5 years was 29.8%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, INFY's return lands within 29.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is INFY's Sharpe ratio?
INFY's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.19, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so INFY earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is INFY with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, INFY's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.51 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against INFY instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a INFY holding.
What are the best alternatives to INFY?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, 12 outperformed INFY in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ACN, MSFT and CACI.
Did INFY outperform the S&P 500?
INFY finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 12 of 26 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -16.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did INFY do in stock market crashes?
INFY fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when INFY fell 90.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies INFY?
These had a low correlation with INFY over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.26), DXJ (correlation 0.17) and EMLP (correlation 0.26); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.18), CLS (correlation 0.19) and FIX (correlation 0.06). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than INFY's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of INFY's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to INFY
ACNAccenture
MSFTMicrosoft
CRMSalesforce
SAPSAP
IBMInternational Business Machines
AMZNAmazon.com
ORCLOracle