Relative Intelligence · Preferred Stocks

How El Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS (EP-PC) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on EP-PC alone. It places EP-PC (El Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS) against 5 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where EP-PC stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: EP-PC's full trading record, from March 1998 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, EP-PC rose 1.8% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, KMI (Kinder Morgan) rose 7.1% and PGX (Invesco Preferred ETF) fell 8.1%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?EP-PC fell 0.4% over the past 3 months, 3.0 points ahead of the preferred stocks ETF PFF (iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF), which fell 3.3%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its preferred stock peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: KMI (Kinder Morgan) rose 4.0%, while CWB (State Street SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF) fell 5.5%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsEP-PC has trailed the market, rising 5.9% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (29.1% against 89.3%). The last two calendar years both went the same way: EP-PC rose 7.5% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termEP-PC turned $10,000 into $13,800 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashEP-PC fell less than the S&P 500 in five of seven sell-offs, but the 2015 China and oil sell-off broke the pattern: it fell 24.2%, more than the S&P 500's 12.8%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationEP-PC is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.37 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.37 with the total US market, less closely than 55% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, EP-PC's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.31: 23% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 24% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- AQNB (Algonquin Power & Utilities, junior subordinated debt) was ahead of EP-PC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (11.6% volatility against 8.9%).
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only nine of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EP-PC with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them BALT (Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF), BUFD (FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF).
How much would $10,000 in EP-PC have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in EP-PC over the past 16 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of EP-PC over the same span and EP-PC's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 16 years rather than EP-PC's full 28 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in EP-PC at the end of September 2010 would have grown to $20,532 by September 2026, less than the $88,503 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the seven other investments on the chart ended ahead of EP-PC, and NVDA finished highest, at $8,585,151.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2010 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,599 of the 2,048 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of EP-PC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 2 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$9M+85,752% total · +52.5% a year
- AAPL$392,248+3,822% total · +25.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$88,503+785% total · +14.6% a year
- CWB$47,573+376% total · +10.2% a year
- CHT$32,693+227% total · +7.7% a year
- AMLP$23,377+134% total · +5.5% a year
- EP-PC$20,532+105% total · +4.6% a year
- PFF$18,880+88.8% total · +4.1% a year
- PGX$17,908+79.1% total · +3.7% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,964 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of EP-PC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- KMI$23,609+136% total · +18.7% a year
- AMLP$23,208+132% total · +18.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- POCT$16,328+63.3% total · +10.3% a year
- DOCT$14,821+48.2% total · +8.2% a year
- AQNB$13,700+37.0% total · +6.5% a year
- CWB$13,115+31.2% total · +5.6% a year
- EP-PC$12,905+29.0% total · +5.2% a year
- PFF$10,208+2.1% total · +0.4% a year
- PGX$9,018−9.8% total · −2.0% a year
EP-PC at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- EP-PC's deepest decline since it began trading in 1998 was 85.0%, from February 2001 to October 2002. It took about nine years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- EP-PC is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 27 full calendar years, EP-PC's best was 2003, when it returned 103%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 65.3%. It lost money in nine of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $112B
- Industry
- Financial - Credit Services
- Price history from
- March 1998
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +5.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +29.1%+8.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +28.5%+5.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +37.8%+3.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +103%2003
- Worst calendar year
- −65.3%2002
- Losing years
- 9 of 27full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 8.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.61return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −85.0%Feb 2001 to Oct 2002
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
EP-PC against the whole market
Where EP-PC ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does EP-PC rank among all stocks?
This section ranks EP-PC on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how EP-PC stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- EP-PC is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | EP-PC | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +5.9% | 1,742 of 3,287 | bottom 48% |
| 3-year return | +29.1% | 1,863 of 3,017 | bottom 39% |
| 5-year return | +28.5% | 1,353 of 2,893 | top 47% |
| 10-year return | +37.8% | 1,641 of 2,202 | bottom 26% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 8.9% | 1 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.61 | 644 of 2,893 | top 22% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −25.4% | 7 of 2,187 | top 1% |
What has beaten EP-PC on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). EP-PC sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than EP-PC with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Nine ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than EP-PC over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half EP-PC's swings, POCT has the best return for its risk: 10.0% a year at 8.0% volatility, 10% less than EP-PC's 8.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.23 against 0.61 for EP-PC.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to EP-PC; faint dots are 1 more of the 9 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 3 with more than 1.6× EP-PC's volatility are in the table only
Is there a better investment than EP-PC?
Investments that beat EP-PC over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among EP-PC's popular alternatives, KMI and AMLP were ahead of EP-PC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (22.5% and 18.9% volatility against 8.9%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AQNB (junior subordinated debt) was ahead of EP-PC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (11.6% volatility against 8.9%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only nine of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EP-PC with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them BALT, BUFD and POCT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat EP-PC over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks EP-PC's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than EP-PC follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than EP-PC's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× EP-PC's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than EP-PC's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with EP-PC?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +5.2% | 8.9% | 0.61 | −25.4% | +37.8% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.37 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against EP-PC. 2 of 5 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.32 | — | ||
AMLPAlerian MLP ETF · Energy Equity | Higher return in most periods | +16.1% | 18.9% | 0.89 | −72.9% | +91.0% | 0.14 | 1.01% | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 1 shownEverything else in Preferred Stocks and the categories next to it (Preferred Securities, Bitcoin Treasury, Bitcoin, Corporate Bonds), plus EP-PC's specific themes. 1 of 34 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
AQNBAlgonquin Power & Utilities Corp. · Junior Subordinated Debt | Higher return in most periods | +5.7% | 11.6% | 0.54 | −42.7% | — | 0.32 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 7 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 102 of 3,594 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
POCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +10.0% | 8.0% | 1.23 | −18.8% | — | 0.35 | 0.79% | |
DOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October · Multi-Asset | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +8.3% | 7.4% | 1.11 | −9.9% | — | 0.36 | 0.85% | |
FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.16 | 0.60% | |
BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.26 | 0.69% | |
JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.22 | 0.20% | |
FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF · Multi-Asset | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +4.8% | 2.1% | 2.20 | −17.8% | +41.8% | 0.25 | 0.14% | |
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Higher return in most periods | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.35 | — | |
What these numbers mean for EP-PC
- Annual return
- EP-PC returned 5.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $12,900. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- EP-PC's volatility over the past 5 years was 8.9%, 52% of the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, EP-PC's return lands within 8.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- EP-PC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.61, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so EP-PC earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- EP-PC's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 25.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 25.4% fall takes a 34.0% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, EP-PC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.37 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against EP-PC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a EP-PC holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 9 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than EP-PC with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 4 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with EP-PC | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.0% | 8.0% | 1.23 | −18.8% | — | 0.35 | 0.79% |
| 2 | DOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +8.3% | 7.4% | 1.11 | −9.9% | — | 0.36 | 0.85% |
| 3 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.26 | 0.69% |
| 4 | HYGHiShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +6.6% | 7.1% | 0.94 | −23.9% | +74.5% | 0.34 | 1.12% |
EP-PC against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against EP-PC, compared period by period and year by year.
How do EP-PC's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at EP-PC, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the five popular alternatives earned more than EP-PC over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Three of the five popular alternatives earned less than EP-PC over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, EP-PC returned 5.1% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with lower volatility (8.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than EP-PC with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | +18.7% | 22.5% |
| AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | +16.1% | 18.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| EP-PC This pageEl Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS | +5.1% | 8.9% |
| CWB State Street SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF | +3.7% | 13.7% |
| PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | −0.2% | 10.5% |
| PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | −2.3% | 11.2% |
Has EP-PC consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares EP-PC with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than EP-PC helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- KMI outperformed EP-PC in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the five popular alternatives, KMI and AMLP, outperformed EP-PC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than EP-PC over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| EP-PC El Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS (this page) | — | +0.8% | −0.4% | +1.8% | +5.8% | +5.9% | +29.1% | +28.5% | +37.8% | 8.9% | 0.61 | −25.4% | — | $112B | — |
| KMI QualifiedKinder Morgan, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +5.8% | +4.0% | +7.1% | +24.6% | +26.9% | +129% | +136% | +163% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | — | $75B | — |
| AMLP QualifiedAlerian MLP ETF | 3/5 short3/3 long | −3.2% | −1.6% | +6.6% | +17.5% | +22.8% | +56.0% | +111% | +91.0% | 18.9% | 0.89 | −72.9% | 1.01% | $13B | — |
| CWB BondsState Street SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF | 1/5 short2/3 long | −6.9% | −5.5% | −4.3% | +7.0% | +4.9% | +54.0% | +20.2% | +178% | 13.7% | 0.34 | −32.1% | 0.40% | $5.3B | — |
| PFF Dividend & IncomeiShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.9% | −3.3% | −5.5% | −3.9% | −3.8% | +21.6% | −0.9% | +29.6% | 10.5% | 0.04 | −34.1% | 0.45% | $12B | — |
| PGX FinancialsInvesco Preferred ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.9% | −6.6% | −8.1% | −7.6% | −8.7% | +16.0% | −11.0% | +16.8% | 11.2% | -0.15 | −34.1% | 0.50% | $3.6B | — |
How did EP-PC do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1999, along with where EP-PC ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with EP-PC and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- EP-PC finished ahead of the S&P 500 in ten of its 27 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, EP-PC finished in the top quarter in five of 15 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 2 of 6.
- Among its popular alternatives, KMI came out ahead of EP-PC most often, in eight of the 14 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of EP-PC; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places EP-PC among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of EP-PC | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP-PC This pageEl Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS | — | +7.5% | +7.1% | +10.1% | −6.3% | +2.5% | +0.6% | +26.2% | −14.3% | −0.5% | +19.6% | −32.7% | +8.4% | +4.9% | +25.6% | +25.4% | +12.9% | +54.8% | −23.9% | −1.4% | +25.2% | −4.2% | +14.6% | +103% | −65.3% | −34.2% | +83.2% | +10.4% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 15 | 2 of 6 | 5 of 6 | 3 of 6 | 3 of 6 | 5 of 6 | 4 of 6 | 2 of 6 | 6 of 6 | 4 of 6 | 2 of 6 | 5 of 6 | 4 of 6 | 4 of 6 | 1 of 6 | 1 of 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 17 of 27 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 8 of 14 | +4.7% | +64.4% | +4.2% | +21.2% | +23.8% | −30.8% | +44.4% | −11.1% | −11.1% | +42.7% | −62.8% | +23.2% | +6.3% | +13.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7 of 15 | +5.8% | +22.8% | +21.4% | +25.5% | +39.1% | −32.3% | +6.0% | −12.6% | −7.9% | +14.9% | −25.7% | +4.8% | +18.6% | +1.9% | +10.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CWB State Street SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF | 9 of 16 | +16.6% | +10.1% | +14.5% | −20.8% | +2.2% | +53.4% | +22.4% | −2.0% | +15.7% | +10.6% | −0.8% | +7.7% | +20.5% | +15.9% | −7.6% | +14.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 7 of 18 | +4.9% | +7.2% | +9.3% | −18.2% | +7.2% | +7.9% | +15.9% | −4.7% | +8.1% | +1.3% | +4.3% | +14.1% | −1.0% | +18.2% | −2.0% | +13.9% | +38.4% | −23.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | 6 of 17 | +3.4% | +6.6% | +9.4% | −21.1% | +3.1% | +7.1% | +17.8% | −4.1% | +10.6% | +0.9% | +7.9% | +16.4% | −2.4% | +14.4% | +3.6% | +11.5% | +19.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How EP-PC has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were EP-PC's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents EP-PC's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1998, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of EP-PC's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: EP-PC fell 37.2% from April to December 2015, while the S&P 500 slipped only 3.8%.
- The slowest recovery came after EP-PC fell 37.2% from April to December 2015; it did not regain that peak until August 2025, ten years later.
Green means EP-PC fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | EP-PC fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −85.0% | −36.3% | Feb 2001 | Oct 2002 | 20 months | Nov 2011 | 9.1 years |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −37.3% | −3.8% | Apr 2015 | Dec 2015 | 8 months | Aug 2025 | 9.7 years |
| No named crash | −21.6% | −15.5% | Jul 1998 | Sep 1998 | 2 months | Apr 1999 | 7 months |
| Dot-com bust | −19.0% | +0.9% | Dec 2000 | Jan 2001 | 1 month | Feb 2001 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −17.8% | +12.5% | May 2013 | Mar 2014 | 10 months | Dec 2014 | 9 months |
How did EP-PC do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far EP-PC, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- EP-PC fell less than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when EP-PC fell 8.9% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than EP-PC in most of the crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than EP-PC.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP-PC This pageEl Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS | — | −2.1% | −8.9% | −22.7% | −12.3% | −0.2% | −24.2% | −9.5% | 0.0% | −51.1% | −85.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 0 of 7 | −3.2% | −20.3% | −55.1% | −19.8% | −4.0% | −64.4% | −16.2% | — | — | — |
| AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 0 of 7 | −2.8% | −20.9% | −63.7% | −22.4% | −4.8% | −42.8% | −10.8% | — | — | — |
| CWB State Street SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF | 1 of 8 | −3.5% | −22.5% | −32.1% | −12.7% | −4.1% | −13.4% | −14.9% | −2.4% | — | — |
| PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 2 of 9 | −7.0% | −18.1% | −33.9% | −8.2% | −0.7% | −6.8% | −14.4% | 0.0% | −64.7% | — |
| PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | 2 of 8 | −7.7% | −19.3% | −33.7% | −6.7% | −0.6% | −6.0% | −10.6% | 0.0% | — | — |
How closely does EP-PC move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares EP-PC with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, EP-PC captured 23% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 24% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.31. It took about the same share of the market's gains as of its losses.
- Only CWB had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than EP-PC's 0.98, out of five popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than EP-PC's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP-PC This pageEl Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS | 23% | 24% | 0.98 | 0.31 |
| CWB State Street SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF | 72% | 70% | 1.03 | 0.78 |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 68% | 82% | 0.83 | 0.82 |
| AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 79% | 112% | 0.70 | 1.18 |
| PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 39% | 59% | 0.66 | 0.50 |
| PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | 35% | 58% | 0.59 | 0.45 |
What diversifies EP-PC?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with EP-PC's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing EP-PC with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- FIX made money in seven of the nine calendar years in which EP-PC lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of EP-PC over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.38 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, CLS and FIX have moved largely independently of EP-PC over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.24 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which EP-PC lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% EP-PC and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2017 | 2015 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP-PC El Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS (this page) | 1.00 | +28.5% | 0.61 | −6.3% | −14.3% | −0.5% | −32.7% | −23.9% | −1.4% | −4.2% | −65.3% | −34.2% | 5.0% | +5.2% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.38 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | +10.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.0% | +7.5% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.18 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +22.8% | +7.7% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | 5.1% | +9.4% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.38 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | +1.1% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 5.8% | +7.4% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.27 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | +13.5% | −0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 5.4% | +6.7% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.30 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | +38.5% | −0.3% | −44.7% | +6.0% | +10.8% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 9.0% | +12.0% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.36 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | −9.5% | +16.7% | +4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | 5.2% | +7.0% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.24 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | +12.8% | −10.7% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +17.8% | — | — | 5.8% | +8.0% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.25 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | −0.9% | +27.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.4% | +8.7% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2017 | 2015 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP-PC El Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS (this page) | 1.00 | +28.5% | 0.61 | −6.3% | −14.3% | −0.5% | −32.7% | −23.9% | −1.4% | −4.2% | −65.3% | −34.2% | 5.0% | +5.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.10 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | −12.7% | +12.6% | −39.6% | −9.8% | +18.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | 6.9% | +11.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.06 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −11.6% | −6.0% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −25.2% | −65.1% | −25.6% | 12.6% | +24.0% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.24 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +32.1% | +67.7% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +20.1% | −9.4% | +73.7% | 10.6% | +20.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.10 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | +12.0% | −4.5% | −40.4% | +29.7% | +64.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | 6.7% | +11.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.20 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +34.8% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 8.2% | +13.7% |
Common questions
What was EP-PC's worst drawdown?
EP-PC's deepest decline since it began trading in 1998 was 85.0%, from February 2001 to October 2002. It took about nine years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were EP-PC's best and worst years?
Over 27 full calendar years, EP-PC's best year was 2003, when it returned 103%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -65.3%.
Is there a better investment than EP-PC?
Among EP-PC's popular alternatives, KMI and AMLP were ahead of EP-PC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (22.5% and 18.9% volatility against 8.9%). Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AQNB (junior subordinated debt) was ahead of EP-PC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (11.6% volatility against 8.9%).
Is EP-PC more volatile than the S&P 500?
No. EP-PC's volatility over the past 5 years was 8.9%, 52% of the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, EP-PC's return lands within 8.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is EP-PC's Sharpe ratio?
EP-PC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.61, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so EP-PC earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is EP-PC with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, EP-PC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.37 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against EP-PC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a EP-PC holding.
What are the best alternatives to EP-PC?
Of the five popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed EP-PC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: KMI and AMLP.
Did EP-PC outperform the S&P 500?
EP-PC finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in ten of 27 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +7.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did EP-PC do in stock market crashes?
EP-PC fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in eight of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when EP-PC fell 8.9% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies EP-PC?
These had a low correlation with EP-PC over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.38), DXJ (correlation 0.18) and EMLP (correlation 0.38); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.10), CLS (correlation 0.06) and FIX (correlation 0.24). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than EP-PC's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of EP-PC's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.