Relative Intelligence · Household & Personal Products

How Unilever (UL) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on UL alone. It places UL (Unilever PLC) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where UL stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: UL's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowIts household & personal product peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from ELF (e.l.f. Beauty, up 67.7%) to PG (Procter & Gamble, up 12.0%). UL has outpaced the market, rising 14.6% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?UL rose 6.1% over the past 3 months, in line with the household & personal products ETF XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF), which rose 4.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its household & personal product peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: EL (Estée Lauder Companies) rose 27.3%, while KMB (Kimberly-Clark) rose 1.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, UL fell 4.7% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (32.9% against 89.3%). That said, UL lagged its household & personal product peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termUL turned $10,000 into $19,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashUL fell less than the S&P 500 in six of seven sell-offs, but the 2015 China and oil sell-off broke the pattern: it fell 15.2%, more than the S&P 500's 12.8%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, UL has a correlation of 0.33 over 5 years, less closely than 65% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years UL took more of the market's losses than of its gains: 46% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 60% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.45. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- CL (Colgate-Palmolive) earned more than UL with less volatility over the past 5 years: 7.2% a year at 19.2% volatility, against 5.5% a year at 21.5%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- COST (Costco Wholesale, discount retail) earned more than UL over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 17.4% a year at 22.9% volatility, against 5.5% a year at 21.5%.
- Whole market
- 469 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than UL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in UL have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in UL over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of UL over the same span and UL's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in UL at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $84,946 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Seven of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of UL, and IPAR finished highest, at $725,262.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 593 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of UL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- IPAR$725,262+7,153% total · +15.9% a year
- CHD$554,277+5,443% total · +14.8% a year
- WMT$272,033+2,620% total · +12.1% a year
- TGT$184,797+1,748% total · +10.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- EL$109,782+998% total · +8.6% a year
- CL$89,873+799% total · +7.9% a year
- PG$87,839+778% total · +7.8% a year
- UL$84,946+749% total · +7.7% a year
- HELE$13,878+38.8% total · +1.1% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,176 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of UL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ELF$34,758+248% total · +28.3% a year
- WMT$23,813+138% total · +18.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- IPAR$16,792+67.9% total · +10.9% a year
- CL$12,718+27.2% total · +4.9% a year
- CHD$12,116+21.2% total · +3.9% a year
- UL$11,838+18.4% total · +3.4% a year
- PG$11,814+18.1% total · +3.4% a year
- MDLZ$11,375+13.7% total · +2.6% a year
- TGT$8,005−20.0% total · −4.4% a year
UL at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- UL's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 53.5%, from December 2007 to March 2009. It took 29 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, UL's best was 1997, when it returned 45.2%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 36.3%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- UL is 10.3% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $141B
- Industry
- Household & Personal Products
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −4.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +32.9%+9.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +30.5%+5.5% a year
- Past 10 years
- +89.8%+6.6% a year
- Best calendar year
- +45.2%1997
- Worst calendar year
- −36.3%2008
- Losing years
- 8 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 21.5%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.36return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −53.5%Dec 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −10.3%below the peak
UL against the whole market
Where UL ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does UL rank among all stocks?
This section ranks UL on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how UL stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- UL's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 1% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | UL | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −4.7% | 2,170 of 3,287 | bottom 35% |
| 3-year return | +32.9% | 1,797 of 3,017 | bottom 41% |
| 5-year return | +30.5% | 1,329 of 2,893 | top 46% |
| 10-year return | +89.8% | 1,378 of 2,202 | bottom 38% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 21.5% | 136 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.36 | 1,374 of 2,893 | top 47% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −30.1% | 20 of 2,187 | top 1% |
What has beaten UL on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). UL sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than UL with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 39 stocks and 430 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than UL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 13% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half UL's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 49% less than UL's 21.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.36 for UL. DXJ earned the most, 26.6% a year, while still swinging less than UL (19.1% against 21.5%).
- Among UL's popular alternatives, CL is in the region. CL earned 7.2% a year against 5.5% a year for UL, at 19.2% volatility, 11% less than UL's 21.5%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to UL; faint dots are 93 more of the 469 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 2 with more than 1.6× UL's volatility are in the table only
Is there a better investment than UL?
Investments that beat UL over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among UL's popular alternatives, CL earned more than UL with less volatility over the past 5 years: 7.2% a year at 19.2% volatility, against 5.5% a year at 21.5%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, COST (discount retail) earned more than UL over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 17.4% a year at 22.9% volatility, against 5.5% a year at 21.5%.
- Across the whole market, 469 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than UL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat UL over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks UL's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than UL follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than UL's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× UL's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than UL's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with UL?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +5.5% | 21.5% | 0.36 | −30.1% | +89.8% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.33 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against UL. 6 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +7.2% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | +68.8% | 0.62 | — | ||
ELFe.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Higher return in most periods | +31.2% | 58.5% | 0.77 | −77.3% | +331% | 0.25 | — | |
CHDChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Higher return in most periods | +6.1% | 21.1% | 0.39 | −31.7% | +154% | 0.41 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | −6.5% | 36.1% | 0.00 | −64.4% | +207% | 0.11 | — | ||
IPARInter Parfums, Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Higher return in most periods | +11.6% | 33.7% | 0.49 | −54.9% | +350% | 0.43 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatility | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 1 shownEverything else in Household & Personal Products and the categories next to it (Discount Retail, Packaging, Consumer Health, E-Commerce), plus UL's specific themes. 1 of 28 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.23 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 848 of 3,586 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.26 | — | |
QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.14 | 0.60% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.36 | — | ||
JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.12 | 0.20% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.24 | — | ||
VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +40.5% | 0.13 | 0.30% | |
What these numbers mean for UL
- Annual return
- UL returned 5.5% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $13,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- UL's volatility over the past 5 years was 21.5%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, UL's return lands within 21.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- UL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.36, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so UL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- UL's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 30.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 30.1% fall takes a 43.1% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, UL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.33 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against UL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a UL holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 469 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than UL with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with UL | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.26 | — |
| 2 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.14 | 0.60% |
| 3 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.45 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.63 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.36 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.50 | 0.06% | |
| 7 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.49 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +11.9% | 19.4% | 0.68 | −54.4% | +30.4% | 0.40 | — | |
| 9 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | -0.07 | 0.80% |
| 10 | Whole market | +11.7% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | +255% | 0.36 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.53 | 0.08% | |
| 12 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.52 | 0.08% |
| 13 | COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.7% | 0.70 | −38.7% | — | 0.43 | 0.49% |
| 14 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.40 | 0.21% | |
| 15 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.32 | 0.79% |
| 16 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.30 | 0.85% |
| 17 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.39 | 0.12% |
| 18 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.34 | 0.15% |
| 19 | Whole market | +7.5% | 11.0% | 0.71 | −13.7% | — | 0.52 | 0.35% | |
| 20 | PDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Broad Commodities | Whole market | +11.7% | 19.3% | 0.67 | −40.7% | +153% | -0.16 | 0.74% |
| 21 | GUNRNorthern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF · Natural Resources Equity | Whole market | +10.1% | 18.8% | 0.60 | −43.0% | +173% | 0.41 | 0.47% |
| 22 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.39 | 0.15% |
| 23 | HYGHiShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +6.6% | 7.1% | 0.94 | −23.9% | +74.5% | 0.27 | 1.12% |
| 24 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.51 | 0.20% |
| 25 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | -0.11 | 0.98% |
| 26 | BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · Buffered Equity | Whole market | +9.9% | 10.5% | 0.96 | −13.7% | — | 0.33 | 0.10% |
| 27 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.47 | 0.05% |
| 28 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.47 | — | |
| 29 | FHLCFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +7.3% | 15.4% | 0.53 | −28.8% | +199% | 0.53 | 0.08% |
| 30 | XLPState Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF · Consumer Staples | Whole market | +7.2% | 13.8% | 0.57 | −24.5% | +121% | 0.66 | 0.08% |
| 31 | DSTLDistillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 16.1% | 0.75 | −33.1% | — | 0.55 | 0.39% |
| 32 | JAVAJPMorgan Active Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.5% | 0.82 | −16.5% | — | — | 0.44% |
| 33 | DBMFiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +9.8% | 12.4% | 0.82 | −20.4% | — | -0.15 | 0.85% |
| 34 | PPHVanEck Pharmaceutical ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.8% | 0.78 | −29.7% | +153% | 0.56 | 0.36% |
| 35 | FTXHFirst Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.9% | 16.9% | 0.75 | −32.1% | +153% | 0.44 | 0.60% |
| 36 | TSPAT. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.1% | 17.1% | 0.81 | −24.7% | — | 0.32 | 0.34% |
| 37 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.28 | — | |
| 38 | DJPiPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return(SM) ETN · Commodities | Whole market | +11.2% | 18.9% | 0.66 | −38.4% | +120% | -0.02 | 0.70% |
| 39 | FYLDCambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.0% | 0.85 | −44.6% | +203% | 0.55 | 0.59% |
| 40 | EYLDCambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF · International | Whole market | +11.9% | 18.4% | 0.70 | −41.8% | +199% | 0.53 | 0.63% |
| 41 | FTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.4% | 0.99 | −20.6% | +158% | 0.32 | 0.95% |
| 42 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.33 | 0.70% |
| 43 | ACIOAptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.3% | 11.1% | 0.86 | −14.2% | — | 0.34 | 0.79% |
| 44 | PJPInvesco Pharmaceuticals ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.2% | 16.6% | 0.72 | −34.0% | +135% | 0.48 | 0.58% |
| 45 | FEMFirst Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund · International | Whole market | +8.0% | 18.7% | 0.51 | −46.2% | +121% | 0.50 | 0.80% |
| 46 | SCHYSchwab International Dividend Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +9.5% | 13.3% | 0.75 | −24.0% | — | 0.71 | 0.08% |
| 47 | INFLHorizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.8% | 17.8% | 0.72 | −21.3% | — | 0.52 | 0.85% |
| 48 | TDVGT. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.6% | 13.8% | 0.73 | −19.2% | — | 0.51 | 0.50% |
| 49 | FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −19.4% | +121% | 0.18 | 0.75% |
| 50 | FLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +8.4% | 13.4% | 0.68 | −22.9% | — | 0.05 | 0.65% |
| 51 | SMIGBahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +6.5% | 16.0% | 0.48 | −19.7% | — | 0.55 | 0.60% |
| 52 | SIXHETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity Index Option ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.2% | 1.00 | −11.7% | — | 0.50 | 0.31% |
| 53 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.37 | — | |
| 54 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.34 | 0.48% |
| 55 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.61 | 0.40% |
| 56 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.61 | 0.05% | |
| 57 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.63 | 0.03% | |
| 58 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.40 | 0.40% | |
| 59 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.38 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +198% | 0.44 | 0.03% | |
| 61 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.49 | 0.04% | |
| 62 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.22 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.46 | 0.06% | |
| 64 | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | 0.37 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +6.8% | 19.4% | 0.44 | −38.7% | +122% | 0.45 | 0.09% | |
| 66 | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.9% | 0.56 | −44.1% | +103% | 0.45 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.34 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +12.0% | 17.2% | 0.75 | −34.3% | +317% | 0.32 | 0.03% | |
| 69 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.1% | 0.57 | −39.0% | +211% | 0.50 | 0.20% | |
| 70 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.27 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +7.5% | 18.0% | 0.50 | −37.4% | +132% | 0.45 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.44 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.31 | 0.26% | |
| 74 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.3% | 0.71 | −34.1% | +293% | 0.40 | 0.15% | |
| 75 | Whole market | +8.2% | 19.4% | 0.51 | −45.3% | +169% | 0.46 | 0.05% | |
| 76 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +157% | 0.67 | 0.31% |
| 77 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +114% | 0.39 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +8.6% | 18.3% | 0.54 | −42.9% | +241% | 0.39 | 0.08% | |
| 79 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.44 | — |
| 80 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.63 | 0.25% |
| 81 | XLIState Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF · US Industrials | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.6% | 0.71 | −42.3% | +246% | 0.48 | 0.08% |
| 82 | LLoews Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.3% | 19.2% | 0.80 | −48.5% | +180% | 0.36 | — |
| 83 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.64 | 0.36% |
| 84 | CNPCenterPoint Energy, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +11.4% | 19.6% | 0.65 | −59.8% | +142% | 0.27 | — |
| 85 | RDVYFirst Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −40.6% | +322% | 0.47 | 0.47% |
| 86 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.34 | — |
| 87 | WECWEC Energy Group, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.2% | 19.0% | 0.46 | −32.3% | +159% | 0.40 | — |
| 88 | FTSFortis Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.4% | 16.4% | 0.58 | −34.3% | +154% | 0.53 | — |
| 89 | USMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF · US Low-Volatility Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 12.3% | 0.66 | −33.1% | +176% | 0.51 | 0.15% |
| 90 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.48 | 0.20% |
| 91 | AEEAmeren Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.9% | 19.4% | 0.49 | −29.1% | +192% | 0.41 | — |
| 92 | FEFirstEnergy Corp. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.5% | 19.4% | 0.52 | −47.7% | +111% | 0.47 | — |
| 93 | XLUState Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF · Utilities Equity | Whole market | +7.8% | 17.4% | 0.52 | −36.0% | +138% | 0.45 | 0.08% |
| 94 | SDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 14.0% | 0.59 | −36.7% | +157% | 0.60 | 0.35% |
| 95 | PPLPPL Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.1% | 18.9% | 0.46 | −48.7% | +59.2% | 0.47 | — |
| 96 | AMLPAlerian MLP ETF · Energy Equity | Whole market | +16.1% | 18.9% | 0.89 | −72.9% | +91.0% | 0.23 | 1.01% |
| 97 | SCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +10.2% | 14.4% | 0.75 | −37.1% | +195% | 0.50 | 0.04% |
| 98 | EVRGEvergy, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +9.5% | 18.9% | 0.57 | −38.8% | +109% | 0.35 | — |
| 99 | BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 18.6% | 0.57 | −32.7% | — | 0.62 | 0.19% |
| 100 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.45 | 0.15% |
UL against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against UL, compared period by period and year by year.
How do UL's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at UL, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only CL and CHD were both more rewarding and calmer than UL over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- 11 of the 20 popular alternatives earned less than UL over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, UL returned 5.5% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (21.5% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than UL with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | +31.2% | 58.5% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | +20.8% | 22.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | +11.6% | 33.7% |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | +7.2% | 19.2% |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | +6.1% | 21.1% |
| UL This pageUnilever PLC | +5.5% | 21.5% |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | +5.1% | 18.3% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | +4.0% | 20.2% |
| KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 0.0% | 21.1% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | −0.5% | 19.1% |
| SPB Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. | −1.1% | 36.2% |
| EPC Edgewell Personal Care Company | −2.4% | 34.3% |
| KHC The Kraft Heinz Company | −3.6% | 23.4% |
| ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. | −6.0% | 36.3% |
| TGT Target Corporation | −6.5% | 36.1% |
| CLX The Clorox Company | −8.3% | 26.7% |
| COTY Coty Inc. | −16.1% | 45.3% |
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | −17.7% | 44.5% |
| NWL Newell Brands Inc. | −20.7% | 55.5% |
| NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | −32.0% | 47.5% |
| HELE Helen of Troy Limited | −33.6% | 53.0% |
Has UL consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares UL with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than UL helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Six of the 21 popular alternatives, led by WMT, ELF and TGT, outperformed UL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- WMT, CL and PG earned more for the risk they took than UL (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than UL over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| UL Unilever PLC (this page) | — | +4.9% | +6.1% | +14.6% | +2.9% | −4.7% | +32.9% | +30.5% | +89.8% | 21.5% | 0.36 | −30.1% | — | $141B | — |
| WMT QualifiedWalmart Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +9.7% | +5.3% | −7.5% | +5.2% | +11.0% | +130% | +158% | +508% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | — | $938B | — |
| ELF Qualifiede.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +17.3% | +44.1% | +67.7% | +47.5% | −10.0% | +12.6% | +289% | +331% | 58.5% | 0.77 | −77.3% | — | $6.8B | — |
| TGT QualifiedTarget Corporation | 4/5 short2/3 long | −2.4% | +11.2% | +20.3% | +57.4% | +75.1% | +58.0% | −28.5% | +207% | 36.1% | 0.00 | −64.4% | — | $70B | — |
| CHD QualifiedChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +11.0% | +8.7% | +10.4% | +29.4% | +21.9% | +21.9% | +34.6% | +154% | 21.1% | 0.39 | −31.7% | — | $25B | — |
| IPAR QualifiedInter Parfums, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +2.8% | −6.2% | +20.0% | +38.9% | +21.2% | +1.3% | +72.8% | +350% | 33.7% | 0.49 | −54.9% | — | $3.7B | — |
| CL QualifiedColgate-Palmolive Company | 3/5 short2/3 long | +10.2% | +3.4% | +14.5% | +24.6% | +22.9% | +38.3% | +41.8% | +68.8% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | — | $75B | — |
| PG Household & Personal ProductsThe Procter & Gamble Company | 4/5 short1/3 long | +9.1% | +7.7% | +12.0% | +14.9% | +8.0% | +15.8% | +28.3% | +145% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | — | $370B | — |
| MDLZ Food ConfectionersMondelez International, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +7.3% | +7.1% | +13.6% | +22.4% | +5.5% | +9.2% | +21.5% | +93.4% | 20.2% | 0.29 | −29.8% | — | $82B | — |
| EL Household & Personal ProductsThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +10.2% | +27.3% | +37.3% | +0.4% | +5.0% | −18.3% | −62.3% | +39.8% | 44.5% | -0.21 | −85.8% | — | $38B | — |
| HELE Household & Personal ProductsHelen of Troy Limited | 4/5 short0/3 long | +6.4% | +5.1% | +48.7% | +42.7% | +53.8% | −71.6% | −87.1% | −63.6% | 53.0% | -0.51 | −94.7% | — | $688M | — |
| NWL Household & Personal ProductsNewell Brands Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +1.4% | +12.0% | +34.0% | +60.0% | +25.1% | −5.5% | −68.7% | −83.2% | 55.5% | -0.14 | −91.8% | — | $2.4B | — |
| COTY Household & Personal ProductsCoty Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +28.3% | +19.3% | +35.9% | +3.5% | −22.0% | −66.1% | −58.3% | −84.3% | 45.3% | -0.16 | −91.0% | — | $2.8B | — |
| ENR Electrical Equipment & PartsEnergizer Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +2.8% | +10.8% | +12.2% | +16.7% | −2.5% | −19.5% | −26.5% | −35.4% | 36.3% | 0.01 | −67.5% | — | $1.5B | — |
| EPC Household & Personal ProductsEdgewell Personal Care Company | 3/5 short0/3 long | +4.2% | −0.8% | +21.3% | +70.7% | +45.3% | −14.0% | −11.5% | −58.3% | 34.3% | 0.10 | −78.6% | — | $1.3B | — |
| KVUE Household & Personal ProductsKenvue Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +9.1% | +3.7% | +13.5% | +16.6% | +36.7% | +12.0% | — | — | — | — | −44.1% | — | $37B | — |
| KMB Household & Personal ProductsKimberly-Clark Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +10.8% | +1.1% | +12.8% | +11.0% | −5.7% | −0.4% | 0.0% | +29.9% | 21.1% | 0.11 | −34.1% | — | $36B | — |
| SPB Household & Personal ProductsSpectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −6.6% | −9.6% | −5.8% | +34.8% | +48.9% | +12.7% | −5.2% | +4.9% | 36.2% | 0.15 | −79.0% | — | $1.8B | — |
| KHC Packaged FoodsThe Kraft Heinz Company | 1/5 short0/3 long | −2.2% | −6.4% | +11.0% | +2.8% | −0.9% | −10.0% | −16.9% | −56.7% | 23.4% | -0.04 | −76.1% | — | $28B | — |
| NUS Household & Personal ProductsNu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +6.4% | −5.3% | −34.9% | −47.1% | −52.3% | −71.8% | −85.5% | −89.2% | 47.5% | -0.58 | −93.0% | — | $242M | — |
| PEP Beverages - Non-AlcoholicPepsiCo, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | 0.0% | −12.8% | −2.9% | −9.2% | −6.7% | −2.3% | +72.6% | 19.1% | 0.07 | −30.3% | — | $183B | — |
| CLX Household & Personal ProductsThe Clorox Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.0% | −8.1% | −12.3% | −10.2% | −23.5% | −20.1% | −35.3% | −3.1% | 26.7% | -0.19 | −58.8% | — | $11B | — |
How did UL do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where UL ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with UL and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- UL finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, UL finished in the top quarter in nine of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in six. In 2025, it ranked 4 of 22.
- Among its popular alternatives, WMT came out ahead of UL most often, in 19 of the 29 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of UL; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places UL among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of UL | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UL This pageUnilever PLC | — | +5.8% | +20.9% | −0.2% | −2.8% | −7.6% | +9.1% | +12.9% | −2.4% | +40.2% | −2.6% | +9.7% | +1.9% | +10.1% | +19.6% | +12.9% | +0.6% | +44.1% | −36.3% | +38.6% | +30.9% | +5.3% | +9.2% | +1.3% | +18.0% | −1.0% | +17.6% | −31.0% | +31.5% | +45.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 29 | 4 of 22 | 2 of 22 | 11 of 21 | 7 of 21 | 20 of 21 | 16 of 21 | 14 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 4 of 21 | 14 of 20 | 8 of 18 | 16 of 18 | 16 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 15 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 15 of 17 | 2 of 17 | 4 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 13 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 12 of 16 | 3 of 15 | 12 of 15 | 6 of 15 | 8 of 15 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 13 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 19 of 29 | +24.5% | +74.0% | +12.9% | −0.5% | +1.9% | +23.4% | +30.1% | −3.4% | +46.6% | +16.1% | −26.6% | +11.8% | +18.2% | +17.1% | +13.8% | +3.1% | −2.5% | +20.0% | +4.9% | +0.2% | −10.2% | +0.6% | +5.6% | −11.8% | +8.9% | −22.7% | +70.5% | +107% | +74.6% |
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −39.4% | −13.0% | +161% | +66.5% | +31.8% | +56.2% | +86.3% | −61.2% | −22.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TGT Target Corporation | 15 of 29 | −24.5% | −2.3% | −1.4% | −34.2% | +32.9% | +40.5% | +100% | +4.7% | −5.8% | +2.7% | −1.6% | +23.8% | +9.5% | +18.2% | −13.0% | +26.3% | +42.4% | −30.0% | −11.6% | +4.7% | +6.6% | +36.1% | +29.0% | −26.5% | +28.0% | −11.5% | +36.2% | +62.2% | +74.2% |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 14 of 29 | −18.9% | +12.0% | +18.7% | −20.4% | +18.9% | +25.5% | +8.3% | +33.2% | +15.3% | +5.7% | +9.4% | +21.2% | +26.0% | +19.3% | +34.8% | +15.4% | +8.7% | +4.4% | +27.6% | +30.0% | −0.9% | +28.1% | +31.3% | +15.2% | +21.3% | −15.3% | +50.0% | +29.7% | +25.0% |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −33.6% | −6.5% | +52.0% | −7.4% | +79.0% | −16.2% | +12.7% | +53.3% | +35.1% | +40.3% | −11.6% | −22.1% | +89.6% | +27.3% | −15.9% | +57.4% | +60.9% | −35.1% | −5.5% | +7.6% | +14.1% | −29.2% | +194% | +4.2% | +26.0% | +41.0% | +55.4% | −11.0% | +5.4% |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 12 of 29 | −11.0% | +16.6% | +3.8% | −5.5% | +2.1% | +27.2% | +18.6% | −19.2% | +17.9% | +0.4% | −1.6% | +8.4% | +27.6% | +15.9% | +18.1% | +0.4% | +22.9% | −10.1% | +22.0% | +21.5% | +9.6% | +4.1% | −3.0% | −8.0% | −9.4% | +0.4% | +41.6% | +28.0% | +62.3% |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 15 of 29 | −12.3% | +17.3% | −0.9% | −5.1% | +20.5% | +14.2% | +39.7% | +3.6% | +12.7% | +9.3% | −10.0% | +15.4% | +23.6% | +5.2% | +7.0% | +9.3% | +1.2% | −13.8% | +16.7% | +13.4% | +7.2% | +12.4% | +18.5% | +11.4% | +3.1% | −27.1% | +21.6% | +16.0% | +50.5% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 14 of 24 | −7.0% | −15.3% | +11.2% | +2.9% | +15.9% | +8.6% | +40.4% | −4.3% | −1.6% | +0.6% | +25.4% | +4.6% | +41.7% | +121% | +24.7% | +22.8% | +8.8% | −13.0% | −4.1% | +32.6% | −17.3% | +14.4% | −14.4% | +16.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | 16 of 29 | +42.1% | −47.6% | −40.1% | −32.3% | +40.0% | +29.8% | +60.3% | +3.4% | +68.7% | −11.9% | +17.0% | +2.3% | +27.2% | +7.9% | +40.5% | +68.5% | +58.1% | −27.6% | +8.2% | +23.3% | −26.0% | +17.7% | +49.9% | −17.5% | −26.5% | −12.7% | +18.4% | +67.1% | +1.7% |
| HELE Helen of Troy Limited | 15 of 29 | −64.5% | −50.5% | +8.9% | −54.6% | +10.0% | +23.6% | +37.1% | +36.1% | +14.1% | −10.4% | +44.9% | +31.8% | +47.8% | +8.9% | +3.2% | +21.6% | +40.9% | +1.3% | −29.3% | +50.6% | −52.1% | +45.3% | +98.8% | −6.2% | +154% | −32.7% | −50.6% | −8.9% | +46.6% |
| NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 12 of 29 | −60.5% | +18.9% | −30.9% | −37.0% | +6.8% | +16.7% | +9.5% | −37.5% | −29.3% | +2.9% | +17.9% | +19.9% | +49.0% | +41.0% | −9.5% | +22.8% | +57.9% | −60.3% | −8.0% | +25.8% | +1.8% | +10.2% | −22.4% | +13.0% | +25.2% | −18.9% | −28.2% | +1.2% | +37.2% |
| COTY Coty Inc. | 5 of 12 | −55.8% | −44.0% | +45.1% | −18.5% | +49.6% | −36.9% | +79.2% | −65.7% | +11.7% | −27.4% | +25.2% | +37.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −40.1% | +14.4% | −2.2% | −13.2% | −2.2% | −13.8% | +14.3% | −3.9% | +10.1% | +34.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPC Edgewell Personal Care Company | 10 of 25 | −47.9% | −6.8% | −3.5% | −14.4% | +34.3% | +12.2% | −17.1% | −37.1% | −18.6% | −6.9% | −17.0% | +20.9% | +37.8% | +4.4% | +6.3% | +19.0% | +13.2% | −51.7% | +58.0% | +42.6% | +0.2% | +32.3% | +34.6% | +46.4% | −10.8% | — | — | — | — |
| KVUE Kenvue Inc. | 0 of 2 | −15.8% | +3.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 12 of 29 | −19.9% | +11.8% | −7.1% | −1.6% | +9.7% | +0.9% | +24.6% | −2.1% | +9.0% | −7.7% | +13.8% | +18.9% | +27.9% | +19.1% | +21.6% | +3.3% | +26.1% | −21.0% | +5.2% | +17.5% | −6.8% | +18.1% | +27.9% | −19.0% | −13.8% | +10.2% | +22.3% | +12.9% | +5.5% |
| SPB Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. | 13 of 29 | −27.9% | +8.0% | +34.1% | −38.7% | +31.3% | +26.8% | +56.7% | −58.8% | +10.7% | +16.8% | −3.1% | +22.6% | +54.1% | +91.7% | −35.2% | −11.8% | +16.4% | −17.6% | +4.6% | +21.3% | −22.9% | +3.3% | +89.8% | +5.3% | +85.5% | −66.2% | −61.0% | +85.5% | +60.7% |
| KHC The Kraft Heinz Company | 4 of 10 | −16.3% | −12.9% | −5.1% | +18.2% | +8.0% | +13.8% | −21.2% | −42.2% | −8.4% | +23.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +43.3% | −63.7% | −51.0% | −13.9% | −4.3% | +38.7% | −31.0% | −8.3% | +46.5% | +30.5% | −10.4% | −67.5% | +280% | −22.4% | +63.0% | +14.6% | +165% | −34.5% | −7.6% | +6.2% | −29.6% | +50.5% | +46.4% | +39.6% | +69.4% | −41.4% | −61.7% | +29.5% | −40.9% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −1.8% | −7.6% | −3.3% | +6.8% | +20.5% | +11.7% | +27.4% | −4.8% | +17.8% | +7.8% | +8.8% | +17.3% | +24.6% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +14.6% | −26.0% | +23.8% | +7.9% | +15.3% | +13.8% | +12.1% | −12.2% | −0.6% | +42.6% | −12.4% | +14.3% | +25.7% |
| CLX The Clorox Company | 14 of 29 | −35.6% | +17.7% | +5.0% | −17.0% | −11.5% | +34.5% | +2.2% | +6.6% | +24.7% | −3.0% | +25.0% | +15.9% | +30.8% | +13.9% | +8.8% | +7.2% | +13.7% | −12.1% | +3.9% | +14.9% | −1.6% | +23.9% | +20.5% | +6.5% | +14.1% | −28.1% | −12.5% | +49.4% | +61.2% |
Risk and diversification
How UL has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were UL's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents UL's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of UL's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: UL fell 52.2% from January 1999 to March 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 8.4%.
- The slowest recovery came after UL fell 52.2% from January 1999 to March 2000; it did not regain that peak until February 2004, four years later.
Green means UL fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | UL fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −53.5% | −52.6% | Dec 2007 | Mar 2009 | 15 months | Aug 2011 | 2.4 years |
| Dot-com bust | −52.2% | +8.4% | Jan 1999 | Mar 2000 | 14 months | Feb 2004 | 3.9 years |
| No named crash | −39.0% | — | Jul 1987 | Oct 1987 | 3 months | Nov 1989 | 2.1 years |
| No named crash | −31.1% | −8.4% | Jun 1998 | Sep 1998 | 3 months | Jan 1999 | 4 months |
| Covid crash | −30.1% | −23.0% | Sep 2019 | Mar 2020 | 6 months | Oct 2020 | 7 months |
How did UL do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far UL, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- UL fell less than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when UL fell 21.5% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CL held up best, falling less than UL in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than UL.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UL This pageUnilever PLC | — | −0.2% | −19.1% | −25.3% | −8.0% | −7.7% | −15.2% | −11.8% | −2.7% | −53.5% | −21.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 5 of 10 | −0.8% | −25.7% | −13.1% | −18.3% | −4.9% | −22.3% | −10.5% | −1.5% | −26.2% | −31.8% |
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −6.0% | −35.3% | −58.4% | −41.7% | −4.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| TGT Target Corporation | 4 of 10 | −3.4% | −43.9% | −21.7% | −30.3% | −3.0% | −15.8% | −10.4% | −1.3% | −60.6% | −42.6% |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 5 of 10 | 0.0% | −31.7% | −21.1% | −9.4% | −1.1% | −13.3% | −12.4% | −1.5% | −28.0% | −23.6% |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −1.6% | −37.9% | −49.1% | −13.7% | −4.4% | −25.9% | −38.2% | −3.0% | −80.9% | −52.1% |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 7 of 10 | −0.9% | −18.2% | −20.7% | −15.7% | −4.8% | −12.2% | −8.5% | −1.9% | −31.1% | −30.8% |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 6 of 10 | −0.7% | −23.8% | −22.9% | −9.6% | −5.1% | −10.9% | −8.9% | −0.7% | −39.0% | −27.1% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −0.5% | −18.3% | −29.3% | −12.3% | −7.4% | −22.3% | −7.4% | 0.0% | −38.2% | — |
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | 1 of 10 | −5.4% | −42.0% | −32.1% | −19.8% | −4.2% | −16.1% | −21.5% | −3.7% | −62.1% | −50.7% |
| HELE Helen of Troy Limited | 2 of 10 | −12.0% | −60.8% | −44.2% | −14.0% | −2.6% | −20.5% | −29.1% | −1.9% | −65.0% | −46.1% |
| NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 1 of 10 | −12.1% | −44.9% | −46.2% | −29.5% | −6.7% | −29.9% | −27.8% | −2.2% | −83.2% | −33.9% |
| COTY Coty Inc. | 1 of 6 | −5.4% | −43.5% | −67.5% | −52.6% | −4.3% | −28.2% | — | — | — | — |
| ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −5.7% | −37.6% | −44.8% | −30.4% | −5.5% | −29.6% | — | — | — | — |
| EPC Edgewell Personal Care Company | 0 of 9 | −4.0% | −36.7% | −40.7% | −24.6% | −7.5% | −25.7% | −21.2% | −3.9% | −74.0% | — |
| KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 6 of 10 | −0.2% | −22.2% | −23.7% | −12.4% | −4.1% | −11.6% | −7.8% | −0.1% | −35.0% | −26.5% |
| SPB Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −8.5% | −61.7% | −60.6% | −47.9% | −6.5% | −25.3% | −28.6% | 0.0% | −23.1% | −76.3% |
| KHC The Kraft Heinz Company | 1 of 6 | −0.4% | −24.1% | −25.6% | −25.2% | −7.5% | −12.2% | — | — | — | — |
| NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −1.3% | −38.6% | −57.4% | −33.6% | −4.7% | −36.3% | −14.3% | 0.0% | −57.6% | −52.4% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −0.8% | −11.9% | −28.3% | −12.3% | −7.2% | −10.2% | −8.3% | −0.2% | −40.4% | −33.0% |
| CLX The Clorox Company | 5 of 10 | −1.2% | −33.4% | −14.0% | −12.6% | −3.0% | −8.6% | −13.2% | −1.5% | −28.4% | −37.3% |
How closely does UL move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares UL with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, UL captured 46% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 60% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.45. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
- WMT took just 36% of the S&P 500's losses, against 60% for UL, while still keeping 74% of its gains.
- Seven of the 20 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than UL's 0.77, led by WMT, CHD and PG.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than UL's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UL This pageUnilever PLC | 46% | 60% | 0.77 | 0.45 |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 74% | 36% | 2.08 | 0.53 |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 47% | 38% | 1.22 | 0.44 |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 46% | 41% | 1.13 | 0.41 |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 105% | 108% | 0.97 | 1.02 |
| TGT Target Corporation | 83% | 87% | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 45% | 55% | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 133% | 171% | 0.78 | 1.81 |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 39% | 52% | 0.75 | 0.46 |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 48% | 65% | 0.75 | 0.48 |
| KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 27% | 48% | 0.57 | 0.39 |
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | 103% | 188% | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| SPB Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. | 68% | 130% | 0.52 | 1.23 |
| CLX The Clorox Company | 31% | 73% | 0.43 | 0.40 |
| ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. | 46% | 126% | 0.37 | 0.99 |
| HELE Helen of Troy Limited | 52% | 177% | 0.29 | 1.11 |
| KHC The Kraft Heinz Company | 19% | 100% | 0.19 | 0.58 |
| COTY Coty Inc. | 39% | 212% | 0.18 | 1.70 |
| EPC Edgewell Personal Care Company | 13% | 93% | 0.15 | 0.68 |
| NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 18% | 191% | 0.10 | 1.09 |
| NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 5% | 135% | 0.04 | 0.92 |
What diversifies UL?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with UL's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing UL with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in UL into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 15% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+3.4% for UL alone, +8.1% for the mix).
- FIX made money in six of the eight calendar years in which UL lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and FDL have moved largely independently of UL over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which UL lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% UL and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2018 | 2016 | 2008 | 2001 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UL Unilever PLC (this page) | 1.00 | +30.5% | 0.36 | −0.2% | −2.8% | −7.6% | −2.4% | −2.6% | −36.3% | −1.0% | −31.0% | 20.2% | +3.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.34 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +6.0% | +18.0% | −19.8% | +1.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 17.2% | +8.1% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.38 | +101% | 1.04 | +8.0% | +10.4% | +23.1% | −8.7% | +29.8% | — | — | — | 17.4% | +6.1% |
| FDL Dividend & IncomeFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 0.48 | +91.8% | 0.98 | +3.0% | +6.7% | +26.1% | −6.0% | +20.7% | −31.1% | — | — | 17.9% | +5.7% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.14 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | −33.5% | +42.1% | −9.1% | +35.6% | −44.7% | −14.6% | — | 18.4% | +10.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.40 | +126% | 0.96 | +12.7% | −0.8% | −4.2% | −1.9% | +8.0% | +4.9% | — | — | 17.8% | +6.6% |
| DIVO Dividend & IncomeAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 0.46 | +69.0% | 0.95 | +7.0% | −1.5% | +22.9% | −3.2% | — | — | — | — | 17.4% | +5.3% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.23 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | −10.4% | +22.7% | −0.9% | +7.4% | — | — | — | 17.5% | +7.4% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.14 | +177% | 0.93 | −0.6% | +64.4% | +53.3% | −18.2% | +28.0% | −39.0% | −18.2% | +18.1% | 17.6% | +7.9% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2018 | 2016 | 2008 | 2001 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UL Unilever PLC (this page) | 1.00 | +30.5% | 0.36 | −0.2% | −2.8% | −7.6% | −2.4% | −2.6% | −36.3% | −1.0% | −31.0% | 20.2% | +3.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.28 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | +54.1% | −0.4% | −24.5% | −17.5% | −39.6% | −2.5% | −36.8% | 18.3% | +10.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.10 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | +1.3% | +37.9% | −16.3% | +7.4% | −20.5% | −25.6% | +350% | 19.0% | +23.0% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.20 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +17.0% | +89.0% | +0.8% | +18.3% | −15.2% | +73.7% | −58.7% | 20.0% | +18.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.24 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | +51.8% | +44.2% | −28.4% | −28.3% | −40.4% | +4.9% | −71.3% | 18.0% | +9.7% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.09 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | +86.6% | +61.0% | −8.2% | +0.7% | — | — | — | 17.9% | +12.5% |
Common questions
What was UL's worst drawdown?
UL's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 53.5%, from December 2007 to March 2009. It took 29 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were UL's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, UL's best year was 1997, when it returned 45.2%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -36.3%.
Is there a better investment than UL?
Among UL's popular alternatives, CL earned more than UL with less volatility over the past 5 years: 7.2% a year at 19.2% volatility, against 5.5% a year at 21.5%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, COST (discount retail) earned more than UL over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 17.4% a year at 22.9% volatility, against 5.5% a year at 21.5%.
Is UL more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. UL's volatility over the past 5 years was 21.5%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, UL's return lands within 21.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is UL's Sharpe ratio?
UL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.36, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so UL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is UL with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, UL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.33 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against UL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a UL holding.
What are the best alternatives to UL?
Of the 21 popular alternatives we compared, six outperformed UL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: WMT, ELF and TGT.
Did UL outperform the S&P 500?
UL finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +5.8%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did UL do in stock market crashes?
UL fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when UL fell 21.5% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies UL?
These had a low correlation with UL over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.34), EMLP (correlation 0.38) and FDL (correlation 0.48); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.28), CLS (correlation -0.10) and FIX (correlation 0.20). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than UL's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of UL's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to UL
WMTWalmart
TGTTarget
CLColgate-Palmolive
PGProcter & Gamble
MDLZMondelez International
ELEstée Lauder Companies
PEPPepsiCo