Relative Intelligence · Environmental Services

How Waste Connections (WCN) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on WCN alone. It places WCN (Waste Connections, Inc.) against 15 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where WCN stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: WCN's full trading record, from May 2001 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowNot every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, RSG (Republic Services) rose 6.0% and CECO (CECO Environmental) fell 27.1%. Over the past 3 months, WCN fell 0.6% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?WCN fell 0.6% over the past 3 months, 5.5 points ahead of the environmental services ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF), which fell 6.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: WCN rose 9.0% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsWCN has gone against the market, falling 1.8% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (27.0% against 89.3%). The last two calendar years both went the same way: WCN rose 2.9% in 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. By year ↓
- Long termWCN turned $10,000 into $37,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, WCN has typically lost about 79% as much as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, WCN held up better than AWK (American Water Works), ES and CLH; only WM (Waste Management) and RSG fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 10 years, WCN's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.60: 65% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 47% of its losses in falling ones. Against the S&P 500, WCN has a correlation of 0.40 over 5 years, more closely than 52% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, industrial machinery) and DE (Deere & Company, industrial machinery) were ahead of WCN in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (26.2% and 29.9% volatility against 20.0%).
- Whole market
- 395 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WCN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in WCN have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in WCN over the past 25 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of WCN over the same span and WCN's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in WCN at the end of September 2001 would have grown to $494,932 by September 2026, more than the $114,557 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of WCN, and AAPL finished highest, at $14,356,990.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2001 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 131 of the 1,326 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of WCN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$14M+143,470% total · +33.7% a year
- NVDA$11M+109,423% total · +32.3% a year
- CLH$3M+26,876% total · +25.1% a year
- WAB$577,865+5,679% total · +17.6% a year
- DE$572,040+5,620% total · +17.6% a year
- WCN$494,932+4,849% total · +16.9% a year
- RSG$310,830+3,008% total · +14.7% a year
- ECL$201,017+1,910% total · +12.8% a year
- WM$138,622+1,286% total · +11.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$114,557+1,046% total · +10.2% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,005 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of WCN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CECO$98,921+889% total · +58.1% a year
- CLH$29,868+199% total · +24.5% a year
- PESI$23,533+135% total · +18.7% a year
- LQDT$19,819+98.2% total · +14.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- RSG$18,545+85.5% total · +13.1% a year
- WM$14,773+47.7% total · +8.1% a year
- ECL$13,921+39.2% total · +6.8% a year
- WCN$12,683+26.8% total · +4.9% a year
- TTEK$11,397+14.0% total · +2.6% a year
WCN at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- WCN's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 45.0%, from September 2008 to March 2009. It took 16 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 24 full calendar years, WCN's best was 2016, when it returned 41.5%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 2.0%. It lost money in one of those years.
- WCN is 14.2% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $43B
- Industry
- Waste Management
- Price history from
- May 2001
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −1.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +27.0%+8.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +34.2%+6.1% a year
- Past 10 years
- +270%+14.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +41.5%2016
- Worst calendar year
- −2.0%2022
- Losing years
- 1 of 24full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 20.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.40return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −45.0%Sep 2008 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −14.2%below the peak
WCN against the whole market
Where WCN ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does WCN rank among all stocks?
This section ranks WCN on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how WCN stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- WCN's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 1% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | WCN | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −1.8% | 2,056 of 3,287 | bottom 38% |
| 3-year return | +27.0% | 1,905 of 3,017 | bottom 38% |
| 5-year return | +34.2% | 1,292 of 2,893 | top 45% |
| 10-year return | +270% | 665 of 2,202 | top 30% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 20.0% | 89 of 2,893 | top 3% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.40 | 1,243 of 2,893 | top 43% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −31.6% | 32 of 2,187 | top 1% |
What has beaten WCN on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). WCN sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than WCN with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 20 stocks and 375 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than WCN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 11% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half WCN's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 45% less than WCN's 20.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.40 for WCN. MPLX earned the most, 23.5% a year, while still swinging less than WCN (18.8% against 20.0%).
- Among WCN's popular alternatives, RSG is in the region. RSG earned 13.9% a year against 6.1% a year for WCN, at 18.5% volatility, 7% less than WCN's 20.0%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to WCN; faint dots are 91 more of the 395 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× WCN's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than WCN?
Investments that beat WCN over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among WCN's popular alternatives, RSG earned more than WCN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.9% a year at 18.5% volatility, against 6.1% a year at 20.0%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WAB (industrial machinery) and DE (industrial machinery) were ahead of WCN in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (26.2% and 29.9% volatility against 20.0%).
- Across the whole market, 395 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WCN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat WCN over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks WCN's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than WCN follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than WCN's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× WCN's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than WCN's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with WCN?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +6.1% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | +270% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.40 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 5 shownThe investments people most often weigh against WCN. 5 of 15 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.78 | — | ||
CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Higher return in most periods | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.61 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +6.7% | 24.1% | 0.39 | −43.7% | +176% | 0.53 | — | ||
LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc. · Specialty Retail | Higher return in most periods | +15.8% | 43.5% | 0.55 | −70.7% | +354% | 0.18 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatility | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.81 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Environmental Services and the categories next to it (Infrastructure, Water Utilities, Industrial Machinery, Engineering & Construction), plus WCN's specific themes. 8 of 66 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +12.7% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | +309% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +6.7% | 21.4% | 0.41 | −37.9% | +208% | 0.47 | — | ||
ITTITT Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Higher return in most periods | +17.1% | 29.8% | 0.68 | −49.5% | +539% | 0.30 | — | |
LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Higher return in most periods | +14.1% | 27.5% | 0.62 | −38.9% | +389% | 0.50 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 772 of 3,553 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.44 | 0.21% | ||
PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.37 | 0.79% | |
FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.28 | 0.85% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +7.5% | 11.0% | 0.71 | −13.7% | — | 0.56 | 0.35% | ||
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.14 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.30 | — | ||
AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +6.4% | 10.7% | 0.64 | −23.0% | +118% | 0.41 | 0.20% | |
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.20 | 0.48% | |
What these numbers mean for WCN
- Annual return
- WCN returned 6.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $13,400. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- WCN's volatility over the past 5 years was 20.0%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, WCN's return lands within 20.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- WCN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.40, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so WCN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- WCN's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 31.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 31.6% fall takes a 46.2% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, WCN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.40 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against WCN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a WCN holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 395 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than WCN with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with WCN | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.44 | 0.21% | |
| 2 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.37 | 0.79% |
| 3 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.28 | 0.85% |
| 4 | Whole market | +7.5% | 11.0% | 0.71 | −13.7% | — | 0.56 | 0.35% | |
| 5 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.14 | — |
| 6 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.28 | 0.27% |
| 7 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.43 | 0.15% |
| 8 | BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · Buffered Equity | Whole market | +9.9% | 10.5% | 0.96 | −13.7% | — | 0.38 | 0.10% |
| 9 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.30 | — | |
| 10 | XLPState Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF · Consumer Staples | Whole market | +7.2% | 13.8% | 0.57 | −24.5% | +121% | 0.52 | 0.08% |
| 11 | JAVAJPMorgan Active Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.5% | 0.82 | −16.5% | — | — | 0.44% |
| 12 | BKLCBNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.8% | 17.3% | 0.84 | −26.2% | — | 0.40 | 0.00% |
| 13 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.35 | 0.60% |
| 14 | DBMFiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +9.8% | 12.4% | 0.82 | −20.4% | — | -0.14 | 0.85% |
| 15 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.40 | — | |
| 16 | FTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.4% | 0.99 | −20.6% | +158% | 0.42 | 0.95% |
| 17 | GSUSGoldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.4% | 17.2% | 0.77 | −25.6% | — | 0.40 | 0.09% |
| 18 | ACIOAptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.3% | 11.1% | 0.86 | −14.2% | — | 0.39 | 0.79% |
| 19 | SCHYSchwab International Dividend Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +9.5% | 13.3% | 0.75 | −24.0% | — | 0.35 | 0.08% |
| 20 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.56 | — | |
| 21 | INFLHorizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.8% | 17.8% | 0.72 | −21.3% | — | 0.42 | 0.85% |
| 22 | TDVGT. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.6% | 13.8% | 0.73 | −19.2% | — | 0.57 | 0.50% |
| 23 | FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −19.4% | +121% | 0.27 | 0.75% |
| 24 | FLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +8.4% | 13.4% | 0.68 | −22.9% | — | 0.01 | 0.65% |
| 25 | SIXHETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity Index Option ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.2% | 1.00 | −11.7% | — | 0.36 | 0.31% |
| 26 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.36 | — | |
| 27 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.35 | 0.40% |
| 28 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.34 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.33 | 0.05% | |
| 30 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.36 | 0.03% | |
| 31 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.51 | 0.04% | |
| 32 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.40 | 0.06% | |
| 33 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.40 | 0.06% | |
| 34 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.1% | 0.57 | −39.0% | +211% | 0.51 | 0.20% | |
| 35 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.3% | 0.71 | −34.1% | +293% | 0.49 | 0.15% | |
| 36 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | -0.03 | 0.80% |
| 37 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.04 | 0.40% | |
| 38 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +114% | 0.41 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.52 | 0.08% | |
| 40 | Whole market | +7.2% | 18.2% | 0.48 | −40.6% | +198% | 0.53 | 0.18% | |
| 41 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.26 | 0.25% |
| 42 | VOEVanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF · US Mid-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.4% | 15.8% | 0.65 | −43.2% | +182% | 0.50 | 0.05% |
| 43 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.39 | 0.08% |
| 44 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.25 | 0.36% |
| 45 | RDVYFirst Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −40.6% | +322% | 0.46 | 0.47% |
| 46 | USMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF · US Low-Volatility Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 12.3% | 0.66 | −33.1% | +176% | 0.61 | 0.15% |
| 47 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.47 | 0.20% |
| 48 | COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.7% | 0.70 | −38.7% | — | 0.33 | 0.49% |
| 49 | EWJiShares MSCI Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.2% | 18.8% | 0.57 | −33.1% | +132% | 0.31 | 0.49% |
| 50 | SDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 14.0% | 0.59 | −36.7% | +157% | 0.51 | 0.35% |
| 51 | SCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +10.2% | 14.4% | 0.75 | −37.1% | +195% | 0.48 | 0.04% |
| 52 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.39 | 0.15% |
| 53 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.43 | 0.35% |
| 54 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.28 | 0.40% |
| 55 | ESGVVanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF · US ESG Equity | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.5% | 0.67 | −33.7% | — | 0.39 | 0.09% |
| 56 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.50 | 0.12% |
| 57 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.20 | 0.15% |
| 58 | BBCAJPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +11.4% | 16.7% | 0.73 | −42.8% | — | 0.47 | 0.19% |
| 59 | DIVOAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +11.1% | 11.9% | 0.95 | −30.0% | — | 0.47 | 0.56% |
| 60 | FNDESchwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +9.8% | 17.0% | 0.64 | −39.9% | +151% | 0.13 | 0.39% |
| 61 | MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.45 | 0.46% |
| 62 | DFAEDimensional - Emerging Core Equity Market ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +8.3% | 18.8% | 0.52 | −32.2% | — | 0.17 | 0.29% |
| 63 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.25 | 0.60% |
| 64 | GUNRNorthern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF · Natural Resources Equity | Whole market | +10.1% | 18.8% | 0.60 | −43.0% | +173% | 0.20 | 0.47% |
| 65 | Popular alternative | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.78 | — | |
| 66 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.45 | 0.20% |
| 67 | TXNMTXNM Energy, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.2% | 14.9% | 0.54 | −46.4% | +150% | 0.11 | — |
| 68 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.46 | 0.25% |
| 69 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | -0.07 | 0.98% |
| 70 | OMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Whole market | +9.0% | 16.4% | 0.61 | −33.2% | — | 0.41 | 0.29% |
| 71 | EWUiShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF · International | Whole market | +11.4% | 16.4% | 0.74 | −43.3% | +130% | 0.34 | 0.50% |
| 72 | PTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.5% | 11.8% | 0.83 | −26.6% | +188% | 0.34 | 0.60% |
| 73 | DEMWisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +9.6% | 15.5% | 0.67 | −37.8% | +133% | 0.20 | 0.63% |
| 74 | WTVWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.0% | 0.83 | −42.2% | +303% | 0.43 | 0.12% |
| 75 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.40 | 0.09% |
| 76 | XYLDGlobal X - S&P 500 Covered Call ETF · International | Whole market | +7.4% | 11.2% | 0.70 | −33.4% | +128% | 0.36 | 0.60% |
| 77 | EQWLInvesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.0% | 0.81 | −34.3% | +291% | 0.44 | 0.30% |
| 78 | AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +8.6% | 13.1% | 0.69 | −28.4% | +165% | 0.40 | 0.19% |
| 79 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.42 | 0.05% |
| 80 | FHLCFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +7.3% | 15.4% | 0.53 | −28.8% | +199% | 0.55 | 0.08% |
| 81 | DSTLDistillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 16.1% | 0.75 | −33.1% | — | 0.49 | 0.39% |
| 82 | DDWMWisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund · International | Whole market | +12.3% | 13.4% | 0.94 | −35.0% | +149% | 0.38 | 0.40% |
| 83 | DHSWisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Fund · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.0% | 13.9% | 0.89 | −37.4% | +156% | 0.38 | 0.38% |
| 84 | RODMHartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF · International | Whole market | +10.6% | 13.5% | 0.82 | −36.0% | +141% | 0.39 | 0.29% |
| 85 | SEAL-PBSeapeak LLC · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +8.0% | 14.3% | 0.62 | −47.8% | — | -0.04 | — |
| 86 | FGDFirst Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund · International | Whole market | +11.6% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −44.8% | +155% | 0.27 | 0.55% |
| 87 | RLYState Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +9.9% | 13.3% | 0.78 | −34.2% | +128% | 0.26 | 0.50% |
| 88 | RAAXVanEck Real Assets ETF · Commodities | Whole market | +11.7% | 15.6% | 0.79 | −33.9% | — | 0.33 | 0.55% |
| 89 | FDLOFidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.8% | 13.0% | 0.79 | −34.4% | +249% | 0.47 | 0.15% |
| 90 | DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +10.7% | 13.8% | 0.81 | −35.3% | +62.2% | 0.15 | 0.90% |
| 91 | RDIVInvesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.2% | 17.3% | 0.75 | −50.0% | +184% | 0.38 | 0.39% |
| 92 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.6% | 0.85 | −41.3% | — | 0.45 | 0.18% |
| 93 | PPHVanEck Pharmaceutical ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.8% | 0.78 | −29.7% | +153% | 0.41 | 0.36% |
| 94 | PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Technology | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.1% | 0.73 | −28.1% | +305% | 0.08 | 0.65% |
| 95 | FTXHFirst Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.9% | 16.9% | 0.75 | −32.1% | +153% | 0.43 | 0.60% |
| 96 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.30 | 0.50% |
| 97 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.53 | 0.19% |
| 98 | JVALJPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.0% | 17.2% | 0.75 | −40.4% | — | 0.37 | 0.12% |
| 99 | FLQMFranklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +7.4% | 16.4% | 0.52 | −37.2% | — | 0.59 | 0.30% |
| 100 | ROUSHartford Multifactor US Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.3% | 14.4% | 0.88 | −35.5% | +238% | 0.48 | 0.19% |
WCN against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against WCN, compared period by period and year by year.
How do WCN's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at WCN, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only RSG and WM were both more rewarding and calmer than WCN over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Eight of the 15 popular alternatives earned less than WCN over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, WCN returned 6.1% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (20.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than WCN with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| CECO CECO Environmental Corp. | +52.5% | 53.9% |
| CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | +23.1% | 28.6% |
| LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | +15.8% | 43.5% |
| RSG Republic Services, Inc. | +13.9% | 18.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| PESI Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | +11.9% | 61.5% |
| WM Waste Management, Inc. | +9.3% | 19.2% |
| ECL Ecolab Inc. | +6.7% | 24.1% |
| WCN This pageWaste Connections, Inc. | +6.1% | 20.0% |
| CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | +2.8% | 28.1% |
| TTEK Tetra Tech, Inc. | +2.2% | 32.3% |
| GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | +2.1% | 30.2% |
| WTRG Essential Utilities, Inc. | +0.2% | 22.4% |
| ES Eversource Energy | −1.4% | 23.9% |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | −2.5% | 26.5% |
| AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | −2.8% | 23.1% |
| RNG RingCentral, Inc. | −19.4% | 64.8% |
Has WCN consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares WCN with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than WCN helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Five of the 15 popular alternatives, led by RSG, LQDT and CLH, outperformed WCN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- RSG and LQDT outperformed WCN in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- WM earned more for the risk it took than WCN (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than WCN over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| WCN Waste Connections, Inc. (this page) | — | +9.0% | −0.6% | +6.5% | −2.0% | −1.8% | +27.0% | +34.2% | +270% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | — | $43B | — |
| RSG QualifiedRepublic Services, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +9.3% | +6.0% | +12.5% | +11.8% | +7.1% | +66.1% | +91.5% | +446% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | — | $71B | — |
| LQDT QualifiedLiquidity Services, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +1.3% | +11.9% | +27.7% | +46.7% | +82.2% | +124% | +108% | +354% | 43.5% | 0.55 | −70.7% | — | $1.4B | — |
| CLH QualifiedClean Harbors, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +1.6% | +2.0% | +4.2% | +29.9% | +30.0% | +102% | +183% | +588% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | — | $17B | — |
| WM QualifiedWaste Management, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +11.9% | −2.6% | +4.3% | +7.5% | +9.4% | +54.9% | +56.2% | +344% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | — | $93B | — |
| ECL QualifiedEcolab Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +6.7% | +7.5% | +5.1% | +10.6% | +4.0% | +85.8% | +38.1% | +176% | 24.1% | 0.39 | −43.7% | — | $81B | — |
| CECO Industrial - Pollution & Treatment ControlsCECO Environmental Corp. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −19.6% | −27.1% | −11.6% | −3.8% | +14.5% | +264% | +725% | +460% | 53.9% | 1.05 | −74.1% | — | $3.4B | — |
| PESI Waste ManagementPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −28.6% | −24.8% | −3.7% | +1.1% | −8.4% | +36.0% | +75.9% | +156% | 61.5% | 0.49 | −65.6% | — | $263M | — |
| TTEK Engineering & ConstructionTetra Tech, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −2.8% | +12.0% | +10.7% | +4.6% | +5.6% | +13.7% | +11.6% | +388% | 32.3% | 0.23 | −47.5% | — | $9.0B | — |
| RNG Software - ApplicationRingCentral, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +5.6% | +101% | +104% | +197% | +197% | +197% | −66.0% | +270% | 64.8% | -0.02 | −95.2% | — | $6.0B | — |
| WTRG Regulated WaterEssential Utilities, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +1.2% | +5.0% | +4.9% | +8.9% | +1.3% | +38.2% | +1.1% | +81.4% | 22.4% | 0.12 | −39.6% | — | $12B | — |
| GFL Waste ManagementGFL Environmental Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +4.0% | +13.7% | +12.9% | +3.9% | −2.2% | +48.6% | +11.1% | — | 30.2% | 0.22 | −42.6% | — | $16B | — |
| CWST Waste ManagementCasella Waste Systems, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +6.9% | −0.5% | +17.0% | −5.7% | +8.3% | +22.6% | +14.7% | +740% | 28.1% | 0.24 | −37.7% | — | $5.8B | — |
| ES Regulated ElectricEversource Energy | 1/5 short1/3 long | −2.2% | −10.6% | −2.2% | −0.5% | −6.0% | +40.5% | −7.0% | +72.0% | 23.9% | 0.06 | −41.7% | — | $25B | — |
| AWK Regulated WaterAmerican Water Works Company, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +1.4% | +2.3% | +3.3% | +6.4% | −4.1% | +26.2% | −13.1% | +131% | 23.1% | -0.01 | −37.1% | — | $27B | — |
| XYL Industrial - MachineryXylem Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.1% | −12.6% | −12.1% | −22.5% | −27.4% | +18.7% | −11.7% | +143% | 26.5% | 0.04 | −46.7% | — | $25B | — |
How did WCN do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2002, along with where WCN ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with WCN and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- WCN finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 24 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, WCN finished in the top quarter in eight of 24 years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 16.
- Among its popular alternatives, CECO came out ahead of WCN most often, in 14 of the 24 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of WCN; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places WCN among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of WCN | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCN This pageWaste Connections, Inc. | — | +2.9% | +15.7% | +13.5% | −2.0% | +33.8% | +13.9% | +23.2% | +5.5% | +36.2% | +41.5% | +30.7% | +3.1% | +32.3% | +5.1% | +23.6% | +26.0% | +8.9% | +7.6% | +17.6% | +25.1% | +4.9% | +41.0% | +1.8% | +27.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 8 of 24 | 10 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 3 of 16 | 6 of 16 | 7 of 15 | 12 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 4 of 15 | 5 of 15 | 3 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 5 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 4 of 13 | 7 of 13 | 9 of 13 | 3 of 12 | 3 of 12 | 6 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 9 of 11 | 2 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 24 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% |
| RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 11 of 24 | +6.5% | +23.0% | +29.6% | −6.2% | +47.0% | +9.5% | +26.6% | +8.8% | +21.0% | +32.9% | +12.4% | +24.8% | +16.6% | +10.0% | −5.1% | +8.3% | +18.0% | −18.9% | +17.6% | +9.9% | +13.6% | +32.4% | +22.8% | +5.1% |
| LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 10 of 19 | −6.1% | +87.6% | +22.4% | −36.3% | +38.8% | +167% | −3.4% | +27.2% | −50.3% | +50.0% | −20.4% | −63.9% | −44.5% | +10.7% | +163% | +39.5% | +20.9% | −35.4% | −25.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 11 of 24 | +1.9% | +31.9% | +52.9% | +14.4% | +31.1% | −11.3% | +73.8% | −8.9% | −2.6% | +33.6% | −13.3% | −19.9% | +9.0% | −13.7% | +51.6% | +41.0% | −6.0% | +22.7% | +6.8% | +68.0% | +90.9% | +69.3% | −42.7% | +360% |
| WM Waste Management, Inc. | 8 of 24 | +10.5% | +14.3% | +16.2% | −4.5% | +43.8% | +5.5% | +30.4% | +5.3% | +24.5% | +36.4% | +7.1% | +18.2% | +37.8% | +7.6% | −7.7% | +13.3% | +6.3% | +4.8% | −8.7% | +24.3% | +4.3% | +3.7% | +29.2% | −28.1% |
| ECL Ecolab Inc. | 10 of 24 | +13.2% | +19.3% | +37.9% | −37.1% | +9.4% | +13.2% | +32.3% | +11.1% | +15.8% | +3.7% | +10.7% | +1.3% | +46.6% | +25.9% | +16.3% | +14.6% | +28.7% | −30.5% | +14.5% | +25.9% | +4.4% | +29.7% | +11.9% | +24.4% |
| CECO CECO Environmental Corp. | 14 of 24 | +98.0% | +49.1% | +73.6% | +87.5% | −10.5% | −9.1% | +13.5% | +31.6% | −62.3% | +87.2% | −49.2% | −2.3% | +64.9% | +82.7% | −6.2% | +51.0% | +63.3% | −78.0% | +22.3% | +56.3% | +66.9% | +109% | −11.2% | −43.9% |
| PESI Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | 8 of 24 | +13.7% | +40.8% | +123% | −44.2% | +6.0% | −34.4% | +287% | −35.6% | −6.4% | +4.8% | −14.5% | +39.9% | −8.5% | −56.1% | −4.9% | −28.2% | +81.6% | −49.4% | +6.5% | +38.9% | −7.7% | −41.8% | +24.4% | −3.9% |
| TTEK Tetra Tech, Inc. | 12 of 24 | −15.2% | +20.0% | +15.7% | −14.0% | +47.4% | +35.4% | +67.8% | +8.3% | +12.5% | +67.6% | −1.4% | −3.9% | +5.8% | +22.4% | −13.9% | −7.7% | +12.6% | +12.3% | +18.5% | +15.8% | −6.6% | −32.6% | +104% | −38.8% |
| RNG RingCentral, Inc. | 5 of 12 | −17.5% | +3.1% | −4.1% | −81.1% | −50.6% | +125% | +105% | +70.3% | +135% | −12.7% | +58.1% | −18.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WTRG Essential Utilities, Inc. | 7 of 24 | +9.4% | +0.5% | −19.4% | −8.9% | +16.1% | +2.9% | +40.5% | −10.7% | +33.8% | +3.2% | +14.5% | +16.1% | +18.8% | +18.6% | +0.9% | +32.5% | −12.3% | −0.1% | −4.9% | −15.0% | +50.7% | +14.0% | +37.5% | −6.3% |
| GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | 2 of 5 | −3.5% | +29.3% | +18.2% | −22.4% | +29.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 10 of 24 | −7.4% | +23.8% | +7.8% | −7.1% | +37.9% | +34.6% | +61.6% | +23.8% | +85.5% | +108% | +48.0% | −30.3% | +32.4% | −31.6% | −9.7% | +76.4% | −1.5% | −68.7% | +6.6% | −4.4% | −12.6% | +6.9% | +54.0% | −40.0% |
| ES Eversource Energy | 10 of 24 | +22.9% | −2.5% | −23.4% | −5.1% | +8.2% | +4.5% | +34.5% | +6.4% | +18.0% | +11.8% | −1.3% | +30.6% | +12.5% | +12.3% | +16.8% | +28.2% | +11.8% | −20.6% | +14.2% | +47.9% | +8.1% | −3.4% | +37.6% | −11.3% |
| AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | 7 of 17 | +7.4% | −3.5% | −11.7% | −17.9% | +24.8% | +26.9% | +37.8% | +1.3% | +29.0% | +23.6% | +14.9% | +29.4% | +16.1% | +20.5% | +30.1% | +17.2% | +11.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | 5 of 14 | +18.8% | +2.6% | +4.8% | −6.6% | +18.9% | +30.9% | +19.6% | −1.0% | +39.5% | +37.6% | −2.6% | +11.6% | +29.8% | +7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How WCN has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were WCN's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents WCN's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2001, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of WCN's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: WCN fell 24.7% from April 2025 to May 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 42.6%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 16 months, after WCN fell 45.0% from September 2008 to March 2009.
Green means WCN fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | WCN fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −45.0% | −44.7% | Sep 2008 | Mar 2009 | 6 months | Jul 2010 | 16 months |
| Covid crash | −31.6% | −26.3% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Sep 2020 | 6 months |
| Dot-com bust | −31.1% | −20.0% | Aug 2001 | Sep 2001 | 1 month | Apr 2002 | 7 months |
| Dot-com bust | −26.5% | −24.1% | May 2002 | Jul 2002 | 2 months | Oct 2002 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −24.7% | +42.6% | Apr 2025 | May 2026 | 13 months | Not yet | — |
How did WCN do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far WCN, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: WCN began trading on May 18, 2001, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- WCN fell less than the S&P 500 in seven of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when WCN fell 45.0% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, WM held up best, falling less than WCN in six of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- WCN began trading after the dot-com bust, but ten of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was ECL's 30.0%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than WCN.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCN This pageWaste Connections, Inc. | — | −1.6% | −20.6% | −29.6% | −11.6% | −6.7% | −11.1% | −12.7% | −1.7% | −45.0% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −1.0% | −15.1% | −33.8% | −10.6% | −9.2% | −8.8% | −18.2% | −0.4% | −53.4% | −34.4% |
| LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −4.5% | −47.8% | −23.8% | −18.9% | −7.9% | −51.1% | −27.9% | 0.0% | −67.3% | — |
| CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −5.8% | −26.6% | −64.5% | −34.9% | −8.7% | −26.9% | −18.4% | 0.0% | −48.7% | −56.8% |
| WM Waste Management, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −0.9% | −16.8% | −29.5% | −10.7% | −8.6% | −6.7% | −21.7% | −0.7% | −41.5% | −32.9% |
| ECL Ecolab Inc. | 2 of 9 | −1.3% | −39.2% | −40.3% | −13.8% | −6.8% | −16.3% | −16.1% | 0.0% | −41.9% | −30.0% |
| CECO CECO Environmental Corp. | 1 of 9 | −9.0% | −34.6% | −52.1% | −22.0% | −8.1% | −41.4% | −29.7% | −0.4% | −89.0% | −58.5% |
| PESI Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | 1 of 9 | 0.0% | −40.5% | −47.4% | −49.8% | −8.2% | −15.7% | −33.5% | −2.5% | −75.7% | −44.8% |
| TTEK Tetra Tech, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −3.6% | −30.5% | −31.8% | −32.0% | −10.4% | −17.2% | −24.1% | −2.4% | −49.8% | −77.6% |
| RNG RingCentral, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −9.6% | −82.5% | −44.1% | −26.8% | −4.5% | −37.3% | — | — | — | — |
| WTRG Essential Utilities, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −1.8% | −24.8% | −39.1% | −14.6% | −6.2% | −8.6% | −13.3% | −2.1% | −36.8% | −34.6% |
| GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | 0 of 2 | −3.0% | −34.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −3.5% | −28.1% | −34.5% | −26.6% | −4.2% | −27.9% | −29.2% | −4.1% | −96.2% | −71.7% |
| ES Eversource Energy | 3 of 9 | −2.7% | −23.1% | −36.8% | −9.1% | −5.4% | −11.5% | −13.8% | −1.8% | −40.3% | −43.1% |
| AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | 2 of 8 | −3.3% | −28.9% | −31.1% | −11.8% | −5.9% | −6.8% | −13.4% | −3.2% | — | — |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | 0 of 6 | −3.8% | −37.9% | −35.9% | −24.2% | −7.2% | −12.9% | — | — | — | — |
How closely does WCN move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares WCN with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, WCN captured 65% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 47% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.60. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only RSG, CWST and WM had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than WCN's 1.37, out of 14 popular alternatives with the same record.
- RSG took just 34% of the S&P 500's losses, against 47% for WCN, while still keeping 71% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than WCN's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCN This pageWaste Connections, Inc. | 65% | 47% | 1.37 | 0.60 |
| RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 71% | 34% | 2.11 | 0.55 |
| CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 106% | 68% | 1.55 | 0.85 |
| WM Waste Management, Inc. | 68% | 44% | 1.54 | 0.62 |
| TTEK Tetra Tech, Inc. | 94% | 76% | 1.24 | 0.88 |
| LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 81% | 69% | 1.17 | 1.10 |
| AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | 48% | 45% | 1.07 | 0.44 |
| CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 126% | 118% | 1.06 | 1.27 |
| CECO CECO Environmental Corp. | 125% | 118% | 1.06 | 1.40 |
| PESI Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | 82% | 85% | 0.97 | 0.83 |
| ECL Ecolab Inc. | 75% | 86% | 0.87 | 0.94 |
| RNG RingCentral, Inc. | 114% | 144% | 0.79 | 0.93 |
| ES Eversource Energy | 49% | 61% | 0.79 | 0.52 |
| WTRG Essential Utilities, Inc. | 55% | 74% | 0.75 | 0.61 |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | 90% | 123% | 0.73 | 1.03 |
What diversifies WCN?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with WCN's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing WCN with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in WCN into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+4.9% for WCN alone, +8.0% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and HDV have moved largely independently of WCN over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.39 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- In 2022, the one year WCN lost money (-2.0%), CLS returned +1.3%.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which WCN lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% WCN and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCN Waste Connections, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +34.2% | 0.40 | −2.0% | 18.8% | +4.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.35 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | 15.8% | +7.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.20 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | 15.8% | +9.3% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.39 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | 16.4% | +6.6% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.41 | +135% | 0.97 | +21.5% | 17.0% | +8.1% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | 17.7% | +11.9% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.43 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | 16.1% | +6.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.04 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | 15.6% | +8.0% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.33 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | 16.9% | +8.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCN Waste Connections, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +34.2% | 0.40 | −2.0% | 18.8% | +4.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.39 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | 17.8% | +11.4% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.01 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | 19.0% | +24.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.26 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | 19.4% | +19.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.35 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | 17.5% | +10.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.13 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | 17.2% | +13.5% |
Common questions
What was WCN's worst drawdown?
WCN's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 45.0%, from September 2008 to March 2009. It took 16 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were WCN's best and worst years?
Over 24 full calendar years, WCN's best year was 2016, when it returned 41.5%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -2.0%.
Is there a better investment than WCN?
Among WCN's popular alternatives, RSG earned more than WCN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.9% a year at 18.5% volatility, against 6.1% a year at 20.0%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WAB (industrial machinery) and DE (industrial machinery) were ahead of WCN in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (26.2% and 29.9% volatility against 20.0%).
Is WCN more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. WCN's volatility over the past 5 years was 20.0%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, WCN's return lands within 20.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is WCN's Sharpe ratio?
WCN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.40, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so WCN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is WCN with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, WCN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.40 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against WCN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a WCN holding.
What are the best alternatives to WCN?
Of the 15 popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed WCN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: RSG, LQDT and CLH.
Did WCN outperform the S&P 500?
WCN finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 24 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +2.9%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did WCN do in stock market crashes?
WCN fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in no. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when WCN fell 45.0% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies WCN?
These had a low correlation with WCN over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.35), DXJ (correlation 0.20) and HDV (correlation 0.39); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.39), CLS (correlation -0.01) and FIX (correlation 0.26). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than WCN's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of WCN's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.