Relative Intelligence · Integrated Oil & Gas

How Equinor ASA (EQNR) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on EQNR alone. It places EQNR (Equinor ASA) against 16 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where EQNR stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: EQNR's full trading record, from June 2001 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowEQNR has run far ahead of the market, rising 29.6% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Both EQNR and the S&P 500 are within a few percent of a record high. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the integrated oil & gas ETF XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) rose 18.0% over the past 3 months, with XOM (Exxonmobil, up 20.7%) and CVX (Chevron, up 20.0%), against 3.9% for the S&P 500. Its integrated oil & gas peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras) rose 45.4%, while TTE (TotalEnergies) rose 12.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, EQNR rose 107% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. Even so, the last two calendar years both went the same way: EQNR rose 7.7% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termEQNR turned $10,000 into $51,600 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. EQNR's 10-year return of 416% puts it ahead of 82% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, EQNR has typically fallen 1.5 times as far as the S&P 500. Even so, in the 2022 bear market, EQNR held up better than PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras), SU and E; only XOM (Exxonmobil) fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationEQNR is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.06 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.05 with the total US market, less closely than 97% of stocks worth at least $300 million. EQNR's link to the S&P 500 has loosened: a correlation of 0.06 over the past 5 years, down from 0.61 in the 5 years before. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- DTM (DT Midstream, oil & gas midstream) earned more than EQNR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 24.5% a year at 25.2% volatility, against 19.2% a year at 34.4%.
- Whole market
- 104 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EQNR with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT (Walmart), XOM (Exxonmobil) and ABBV (AbbVie).
How much would $10,000 in EQNR have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in EQNR over the past 25 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of EQNR over the same span and EQNR's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in EQNR at the end of September 2001 would have grown to $249,121 by September 2026, more than the $114,557 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of EQNR, and LNG finished highest, at $4,917,892.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2001 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 276 of the 1,326 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of EQNR; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LNG$5M+49,079% total · +28.1% a year
- FRO$487,805+4,778% total · +16.8% a year
- EOG$285,678+2,757% total · +14.3% a year
- PBR-A$261,250+2,513% total · +13.9% a year
- PBR$254,233+2,442% total · +13.8% a year
- EQNR$249,121+2,391% total · +13.7% a year
- SU$174,925+1,649% total · +12.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$114,557+1,046% total · +10.2% a year
- E$94,438+844% total · +9.4% a year
- SHEL$63,241+532% total · +7.7% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 542 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of EQNR; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- YPF$107,580+976% total · +60.8% a year
- PBR$64,214+542% total · +45.1% a year
- SU$40,398+304% total · +32.2% a year
- CVE$35,159+252% total · +28.6% a year
- XOM$32,965+230% total · +26.9% a year
- LNG$28,953+190% total · +23.7% a year
- E$27,904+179% total · +22.8% a year
- SHEL$25,892+159% total · +21.0% a year
- EQNR$24,243+142% total · +19.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
EQNR at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- EQNR's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 68.4%, from May to November 2008. It took about ten years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 24 full calendar years, EQNR's best was 2021, when it returned 64.6%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 43.2%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- EQNR is 2.6% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $109B
- Industry
- Oil & Gas Integrated
- Price history from
- June 2001
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +107%total return
- Past 3 years
- +73.2%+20.1% a year
- Past 5 years
- +141%+19.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +416%+17.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +64.6%2021
- Worst calendar year
- −43.2%2008
- Losing years
- 8 of 24full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 34.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.69return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −68.4%May 2008 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −2.6%below the peak
EQNR against the whole market
Where EQNR ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does EQNR rank among all stocks?
This section ranks EQNR on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how EQNR stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- EQNR's 1-year return ranks in the top 5% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | EQNR | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +107% | 154 of 3,287 | top 5% |
| 3-year return | +73.2% | 1,206 of 3,017 | top 40% |
| 5-year return | +141% | 482 of 2,893 | top 17% |
| 10-year return | +416% | 399 of 2,202 | top 18% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 34.4% | 1,101 of 2,893 | top 38% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.69 | 492 of 2,893 | top 17% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −66.8% | 1,174 of 2,187 | bottom 47% |
What has beaten EQNR on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). EQNR sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than EQNR with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 87 stocks and 17 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than EQNR over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 3% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half EQNR's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 28% less than EQNR's 34.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.69 for EQNR. HWM earned the most, 47.3% a year, while still swinging less than EQNR (32.5% against 34.4%).
- Among EQNR's popular alternatives, SU, XOM and E are in the region. SU earned 33.1% a year against 19.2% a year for EQNR, at 32.5% volatility, 6% less than EQNR's 34.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to EQNR; faint dots are 86 more of the 104 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than EQNR?
Investments that beat EQNR over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among EQNR's popular alternatives, SU, XOM and E earned more than EQNR with less volatility over the past 5 years. SU returned 33.1% a year at 32.5% volatility, against 19.2% a year at 34.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, DTM (oil & gas midstream) earned more than EQNR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 24.5% a year at 25.2% volatility, against 19.2% a year at 34.4%.
- Across the whole market, 104 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EQNR with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, XOM and ABBV.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat EQNR over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks EQNR's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than EQNR follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than EQNR's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× EQNR's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than EQNR's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with EQNR?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +19.2% | 34.4% | 0.69 | −66.8% | +416% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.06 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against EQNR. 7 of 16 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | 0.57 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.57 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.66 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | 0.56 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | 0.61 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.66 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Integrated Oil & Gas and Oil & Gas and the categories next to it (Exploration & Production, Oil & Gas Midstream, Oilfield Services), plus EQNR's specific themes. 23 of 70 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.57 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.60 | — | ||
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | On the frontierHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | 0.28 | — | |
DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.20 | — | |
FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +1,194% | 0.25 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.40 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 236 of 3,547 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.04 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.03 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.20 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.00 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.23 | — | ||
SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.63 | 0.80% | |
WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.13 | — | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | -0.09 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for EQNR
- Annual return
- EQNR returned 19.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $24,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- EQNR's volatility over the past 5 years was 34.4%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, EQNR's return lands within 34.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- EQNR's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.69, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so EQNR earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- EQNR's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 66.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 66.8% fall takes a 201% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, EQNR's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.06 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are close to unrelated, or move in opposite directions, so it can steady a stock portfolio. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against EQNR instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a EQNR holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 104 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than EQNR with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 98 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with EQNR | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.04 | — | |
| 2 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.03 | 0.48% |
| 3 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.20 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.00 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.13 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.08 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.02 | — | |
| 8 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.24 | — |
| 9 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.09 | — |
| 10 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.27 | — |
| 11 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.16 | — |
| 12 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.30 | — |
| 13 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.04 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.05 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.12 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.02 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | -0.16 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.12 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.03 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.12 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.05 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | -0.04 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | -0.09 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.12 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.17 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | -0.05 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.05 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.15 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.04 | — | |
| 30 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.17 | — |
| 31 | Popular alternative | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | 0.57 | — | |
| 32 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.63 | 0.80% |
| 33 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | -0.09 | — |
| 34 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.19 | — |
| 35 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | -0.12 | — |
| 36 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | 0.06 | — |
| 37 | HUBBHubbell Incorporated · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +21.0% | 30.0% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +442% | -0.08 | — |
| 38 | WWDWoodward, Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +23.8% | 32.3% | 0.82 | −60.6% | +488% | 0.07 | — |
| 39 | APGAPi Group Corporation · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +23.0% | 31.9% | 0.81 | −49.6% | — | 0.05 | — |
| 40 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | -0.03 | — |
| 41 | Popular alternative | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.57 | — | |
| 42 | DACDanaos Corporation · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +20.6% | 32.0% | 0.75 | −94.6% | +449% | 0.38 | — |
| 43 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | -0.09 | 0.59% |
| 44 | ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc. · Auto Parts | Whole market | +27.3% | 29.9% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +367% | 0.14 | — |
| 45 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | -0.11 | — |
| 46 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.11 | — | |
| 47 | AVTAvnet, Inc. · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +22.1% | 30.7% | 0.81 | −58.4% | +173% | 0.17 | — |
| 48 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.18 | — |
| 49 | FSSFederal Signal Corporation · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +23.3% | 31.7% | 0.82 | −33.0% | +882% | -0.04 | — |
| 50 | ESEESCO Technologies Inc. · Electronic Instruments | Whole market | +24.2% | 31.1% | 0.85 | −46.0% | +473% | 0.10 | — |
| 51 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.02 | — |
| 52 | Popular alternative | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.66 | — | |
| 53 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | -0.10 | 0.19% |
| 54 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | -0.15 | 0.40% |
| 55 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Same or nearby category | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.20 | — |
| 56 | Popular alternative | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | 0.56 | — | |
| 57 | ESQEsquire Financial Holdings, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.7% | 31.7% | 1.03 | −56.5% | — | 0.01 | — |
| 58 | FCFSFirstCash Holdings, Inc · Consumer Finance | Whole market | +20.6% | 30.5% | 0.77 | −50.2% | +422% | 0.05 | — |
| 59 | IGICInternational General Insurance Holdings Ltd. · Insurance - Diversified | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.9% | 1.03 | −50.6% | — | 0.00 | — |
| 60 | DMLPDorchester Minerals, L.P. · Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Whole market | +21.1% | 29.1% | 0.81 | −56.8% | +435% | 0.50 | — |
| 61 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | -0.08 | 0.45% |
| 62 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.12 | 0.59% |
| 63 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.13 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | -0.09 | — | |
| 65 | ARGTGlobal X - MSCI Argentina ETF · International | Whole market | +22.3% | 32.1% | 0.79 | −61.7% | +301% | 0.14 | 0.59% |
| 66 | FBIZFirst Business Financial Services, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +23.1% | 29.4% | 0.85 | −50.2% | +307% | 0.14 | — |
| 67 | Same or nearby category | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.25 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.12 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +20.4% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | +657% | 0.02 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +339% | 0.08 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +20.3% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −66.5% | +213% | 0.01 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.26 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | 0.64 | 0.08% | |
| 74 | SHGShinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +21.0% | 31.1% | 0.77 | −64.1% | +175% | 0.13 | — |
| 75 | USFDUS Foods Holding Corp. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +22.7% | 29.8% | 0.84 | −77.3% | +347% | 0.08 | — |
| 76 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.12 | — |
| 77 | WFWoori Financial Group Inc. · Banks | Whole market | +26.3% | 31.6% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +282% | 0.21 | — |
| 78 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | -0.03 | — |
| 79 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.20 | — |
| 80 | SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +20.3% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +430% | 0.08 | — |
| 81 | RGLDRoyal Gold, Inc. · Gold Mining | Whole market | +20.6% | 32.4% | 0.74 | −49.5% | +282% | 0.07 | — |
| 82 | Same or nearby category | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.39 | — | |
| 83 | Same or nearby category | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.35 | — | |
| 84 | Same or nearby category | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | 0.55 | — | |
| 85 | Same or nearby category | +26.5% | 32.5% | 0.89 | −77.5% | +433% | 0.61 | — | |
| 86 | RRyder System, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +25.1% | 32.6% | 0.85 | −72.3% | +407% | 0.10 | — |
| 87 | Popular alternative | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.70 | — | |
| 88 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Same or nearby category | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.46 | — |
| 89 | IFSIntercorp Financial Services Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +20.8% | 31.1% | 0.77 | −56.9% | — | 0.13 | — |
| 90 | GVAGranite Construction Incorporated · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +23.8% | 30.6% | 0.85 | −84.7% | +186% | -0.11 | — |
| 91 | WESWestern Midstream Partners, LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Same or nearby category | +23.5% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | +128% | 0.33 | — |
| 92 | ARLPAlliance Resource Partners, L.P. · Coal | Whole market | +29.4% | 31.6% | 0.98 | −85.3% | +173% | 0.42 | — |
| 93 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Same or nearby category | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.46 | — |
| 94 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | -0.01 | — |
| 95 | SXIStandex International Corporation · Industrial - Machinery | Whole market | +20.6% | 32.6% | 0.74 | −65.6% | +226% | -0.14 | — |
| 96 | IYEiShares U.S. Energy ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.1% | 25.2% | 0.89 | −68.6% | +159% | 0.65 | 0.37% |
| 97 | SBRSabine Royalty Trust · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +21.4% | 31.6% | 0.78 | −50.7% | +340% | 0.29 | — |
| 98 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.45 | 0.95% |
EQNR against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against EQNR, compared period by period and year by year.
How do EQNR's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at EQNR, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Six of the 16 popular alternatives, led by SU, XOM and LNG, were both more rewarding and calmer than EQNR over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, EQNR returned 19.2% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (34.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than EQNR with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| YPF YPF Sociedad Anónima | +60.7% | 54.1% |
| PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | +50.3% | 37.5% |
| SU Suncor Energy Inc. | +33.1% | 32.5% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | +27.1% | 26.5% |
| CVE Cenovus Energy Inc. | +26.6% | 39.4% |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | +23.4% | 30.2% |
| E Eni S.p.A. | +23.0% | 25.6% |
| SHEL Shell plc | +21.0% | 24.8% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | +19.5% | 25.2% |
| EQNR This pageEquinor ASA | +19.2% | 34.4% |
| COP ConocoPhillips | +18.2% | 32.6% |
| TTE TotalEnergies SE | +18.0% | 25.8% |
| EC Ecopetrol S.A. | +18.0% | 37.9% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | +16.6% | 32.3% |
| BP BP p.l.c. | +16.0% | 28.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| SLB Slb N.V. | +10.0% | 37.5% |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | +9.1% | 18.9% |
Has EQNR consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares EQNR with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than EQNR helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- PBR outperformed EQNR in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 16 popular alternatives, PBR and SU, outperformed EQNR in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- XOM, E and LNG earned more for the risk they took than EQNR (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than EQNR over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| EQNR Equinor ASA (this page) | — | +7.7% | +23.4% | +29.6% | +92.7% | +107% | +73.2% | +141% | +416% | 34.4% | 0.69 | −66.8% | — | $109B | — |
| PBR QualifiedPetróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +24.6% | +45.4% | +31.0% | +128% | +140% | +132% | +667% | +674% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | — | $166B | — |
| SU QualifiedSuncor Energy Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +16.7% | +26.8% | +28.9% | +75.6% | +111% | +161% | +318% | +295% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | — | $93B | — |
| E Oil & Gas IntegratedEni S.p.A. | 1/5 short2/3 long | +10.2% | +20.3% | +14.6% | +56.0% | +77.9% | +120% | +181% | +278% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | — | $86B | — |
| SHEL Oil & Gas IntegratedShell plc | 1/5 short2/3 long | +13.2% | +23.5% | +22.1% | +43.7% | +50.3% | +77.1% | +159% | +233% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | — | $301B | — |
| XOM Oil & Gas IntegratedExxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 1/5 short2/3 long | +12.4% | +20.7% | +22.0% | +47.9% | +62.4% | +76.7% | +232% | +214% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | — | $731B | — |
| CVE Oil & Gas IntegratedCenovus Energy Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | +5.1% | +18.0% | +34.6% | +92.4% | +101% | +76.2% | +225% | +163% | 39.4% | 0.80 | −89.2% | — | $61B | — |
| LNG Oil & Gas MidstreamCheniere Energy, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | +3.0% | +7.2% | +12.8% | +44.3% | +29.3% | +69.8% | +186% | +616% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | — | $59B | — |
| YPF Oil & Gas IntegratedYPF Sociedad Anónima | 0/5 short2/3 long | −4.5% | +0.7% | +23.9% | +39.9% | +102% | +313% | +971% | +173% | 54.1% | 1.14 | −90.1% | — | $20B | — |
| EC Oil & Gas IntegratedEcopetrol S.A. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +5.0% | +10.3% | +35.7% | +81.5% | +112% | +116% | +129% | +401% | 37.9% | 0.63 | −73.3% | — | $36B | — |
| ENB Oil & Gas MidstreamEnbridge Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −0.6% | −12.9% | −4.6% | +5.0% | +8.5% | +84.0% | +54.3% | +103% | 18.9% | 0.56 | −44.1% | — | $107B | — |
| COP Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionConocoPhillips | 2/5 short0/3 long | +14.4% | +27.0% | +27.1% | +54.3% | +72.9% | +28.5% | +131% | +379% | 32.6% | 0.68 | −70.7% | — | $175B | — |
| CVX Oil & Gas IntegratedChevron Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +10.8% | +20.0% | +25.4% | +48.8% | +51.9% | +53.4% | +144% | +238% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | — | $446B | — |
| BP Oil & Gas IntegratedBP p.l.c. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +14.4% | +19.0% | +12.1% | +43.0% | +56.3% | +46.5% | +110% | +141% | 28.7% | 0.66 | −63.9% | — | $130B | — |
| EOG Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionEOG Resources, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +12.4% | +12.7% | +24.0% | +51.9% | +53.1% | +31.9% | +115% | +131% | 32.3% | 0.64 | −77.1% | — | $83B | — |
| TTE Oil & Gas IntegratedTotalEnergies SE | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.2% | +12.8% | +5.7% | +40.3% | +55.2% | +60.5% | +129% | +234% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | — | $201B | — |
| SLB Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesSlb N.V. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.4% | +8.3% | −3.3% | +26.4% | +53.2% | −7.2% | +60.7% | −21.3% | 37.5% | 0.44 | −84.5% | — | $74B | — |
How did EQNR do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2002, along with where EQNR ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with EQNR and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- EQNR finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 24 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, EQNR finished in the top quarter in nine of 24 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 11 of 17.
- Among its popular alternatives, LNG came out ahead of EQNR most often, in 15 of the 24 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of EQNR; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places EQNR among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of EQNR | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQNR This pageEquinor ASA | — | +7.7% | −16.0% | −0.8% | +42.9% | +64.6% | −13.6% | −1.0% | +3.4% | +23.4% | +38.3% | −16.6% | −22.5% | +1.4% | +2.1% | +12.7% | −0.1% | +57.8% | −43.2% | +22.8% | +22.0% | +51.4% | +45.6% | +43.8% | +31.8% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 24 | 11 of 17 | 15 of 17 | 12 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 15 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 13 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 13 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 12 of 17 | 3 of 16 | 11 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 4 of 15 | 3 of 15 | 6 of 15 | 2 of 15 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 24 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% |
| PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 11 of 24 | +2.3% | −2.9% | +89.6% | +55.4% | +19.3% | −29.0% | +24.2% | +27.7% | +1.8% | +135% | −41.1% | −45.1% | −28.3% | −20.0% | −32.1% | −18.1% | +101% | −55.6% | +132% | +51.1% | +85.0% | +43.9% | +111% | −32.0% |
| SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 13 of 24 | +29.7% | +16.2% | +6.0% | +32.3% | +55.0% | −46.6% | +22.1% | −21.3% | +15.8% | +31.2% | −16.3% | −7.0% | +8.6% | +16.2% | −23.8% | +9.9% | +82.6% | −64.0% | +38.4% | +25.4% | +79.0% | +42.3% | +61.2% | −3.9% |
| E Eni S.p.A. | 9 of 24 | +49.0% | −13.6% | +27.5% | +11.0% | +44.9% | −28.1% | +4.8% | +0.6% | +9.2% | +15.9% | −8.8% | −23.6% | +4.8% | +26.6% | +1.0% | −7.2% | +13.4% | −29.9% | +12.9% | +20.6% | +10.8% | +39.6% | +28.8% | +32.9% |
| SHEL Shell plc | 11 of 24 | +22.2% | −0.9% | +20.2% | +36.0% | +28.4% | −37.4% | +7.7% | −7.5% | +31.0% | +28.2% | −27.1% | −1.3% | +9.0% | −0.9% | +14.8% | +17.6% | +20.9% | −34.2% | +23.5% | +19.3% | +12.8% | +14.4% | +24.5% | −7.3% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 13 of 24 | +16.0% | +11.3% | −6.3% | +87.4% | +57.6% | −36.2% | +7.2% | −15.1% | −3.8% | +19.9% | −12.8% | −6.0% | +20.1% | +4.7% | +18.7% | +10.1% | −12.6% | −13.1% | +24.3% | +39.1% | +11.8% | +28.1% | +20.7% | −8.9% |
| CVE Cenovus Energy Inc. | 7 of 16 | +15.8% | −5.9% | −12.3% | +61.1% | +105% | −39.6% | +47.2% | −21.6% | −38.6% | +21.1% | −36.1% | −25.3% | −11.9% | +3.6% | +2.3% | +35.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 15 of 24 | −8.7% | +27.2% | +15.0% | +49.3% | +69.5% | −1.7% | +3.2% | +9.9% | +29.9% | +11.2% | −47.1% | +63.3% | +130% | +116% | +57.5% | +128% | −15.1% | −91.3% | +13.0% | −22.4% | +16.9% | +444% | +815% | +28.0% |
| YPF YPF Sociedad Anónima | 9 of 24 | −14.9% | +147% | +87.1% | +141% | −18.7% | −59.4% | −12.9% | −41.2% | +39.5% | +5.8% | −40.3% | −19.3% | +128% | −57.4% | −24.8% | +23.2% | +5.2% | +26.5% | −5.7% | −4.0% | +27.4% | +32.8% | +246% | −31.6% |
| EC Ecopetrol S.A. | 7 of 17 | +48.5% | −24.6% | +40.1% | −5.0% | +0.8% | −29.3% | +38.7% | +13.5% | +64.4% | +28.9% | −55.7% | −52.3% | −31.5% | +41.5% | +6.1% | +85.1% | +41.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | 10 of 24 | +19.5% | +26.3% | −1.1% | +6.5% | +30.9% | −13.6% | +36.0% | −15.5% | −3.7% | +32.4% | −33.3% | +21.0% | +3.7% | +19.2% | +37.0% | +26.2% | +47.3% | −17.0% | +21.4% | +13.5% | +29.5% | +24.8% | +57.5% | +3.1% |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 13 of 24 | −2.3% | −12.2% | +2.0% | +72.2% | +87.1% | −36.0% | +6.6% | +15.6% | +11.9% | +10.1% | −29.0% | +1.5% | +27.1% | +8.0% | +11.0% | +38.6% | +2.8% | −39.9% | +25.4% | +26.5% | +36.9% | +35.6% | +39.8% | −17.5% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 12 of 24 | +10.1% | +1.3% | −13.6% | +58.5% | +46.2% | −25.9% | +15.3% | −9.7% | +10.6% | +36.7% | −16.2% | −7.0% | +19.3% | +5.1% | +20.3% | +22.9% | +8.1% | −18.3% | +30.5% | +33.7% | +11.5% | +25.6% | +35.4% | −23.2% |
| BP BP p.l.c. | 8 of 24 | +24.5% | −11.9% | +6.0% | +37.0% | +36.4% | −41.3% | +5.9% | −4.6% | +20.0% | +28.8% | −12.8% | −17.6% | +22.8% | +2.0% | +0.5% | −22.7% | +32.9% | −32.5% | +13.2% | +8.0% | +13.6% | +22.2% | +26.4% | −9.5% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 11 of 24 | −11.4% | +4.3% | −2.0% | +56.9% | +88.6% | −38.6% | −2.8% | −18.7% | +7.5% | +44.0% | −22.5% | +10.3% | +39.7% | +23.4% | +8.5% | −5.5% | +47.4% | −25.0% | +43.6% | −14.6% | +106% | +55.3% | +16.1% | +2.5% |
| TTE TotalEnergies SE | 9 of 24 | +27.6% | −14.7% | +14.1% | +34.9% | +26.0% | −16.6% | +10.3% | −0.8% | +14.3% | +20.0% | −7.0% | −12.1% | +25.0% | +8.0% | +1.7% | −11.3% | +22.6% | −29.8% | +18.9% | +21.3% | +18.8% | +22.6% | +33.4% | +4.0% |
| SLB Slb N.V. | 8 of 24 | +3.3% | −24.5% | −0.8% | +81.1% | +39.6% | −43.8% | +17.8% | −44.7% | −18.5% | +23.5% | −16.3% | −3.6% | +32.1% | +3.0% | −17.2% | +30.0% | +56.2% | −56.5% | +57.1% | +31.1% | +46.6% | +23.8% | +32.0% | −22.2% |
Risk and diversification
How EQNR has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were EQNR's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents EQNR's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2001, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of EQNR's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: EQNR fell 34.5% from August 2022 to May 2023, while the S&P 500 rose 2.3%.
- The slowest recovery came after EQNR fell 68.4% from May to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until May 2018, ten years later.
Green means EQNR fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | EQNR fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −68.4% | −45.3% | May 2008 | Nov 2008 | 6 months | May 2018 | 9.5 years |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −66.8% | −15.4% | Sep 2018 | Mar 2020 | 18 months | Sep 2021 | 18 months |
| 2022 bear market | −34.5% | +2.3% | Aug 2022 | May 2023 | 9 months | Feb 2026 | 2.8 years |
| No named crash | −30.9% | +1.5% | May 2006 | Oct 2006 | 5 months | Jun 2007 | 8 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −28.4% | −12.7% | Oct 2007 | Jan 2008 | 3 months | Apr 2008 | 3 months |
How did EQNR do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far EQNR, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: EQNR began trading on June 18, 2001, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, ENB held up best, falling less than EQNR in eight of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- EQNR began trading after the dot-com bust, but 13 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was ENB's 21.0%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
- EQNR fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when EQNR fell 34.9% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than EQNR.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQNR This pageEquinor ASA | — | −2.8% | −24.5% | −49.0% | −29.1% | −4.4% | −34.9% | −19.9% | −1.0% | −68.4% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 1 of 9 | −7.6% | −26.6% | −71.2% | −26.3% | −8.4% | −54.9% | −37.6% | −1.6% | −80.1% | — |
| SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 1 of 9 | −6.4% | −36.6% | −65.3% | −34.0% | −7.0% | −34.7% | −42.2% | −0.2% | −79.9% | −25.4% |
| E Eni S.p.A. | 3 of 9 | −2.5% | −33.7% | −49.7% | −23.2% | −6.9% | −30.6% | −25.1% | −1.1% | −61.8% | −22.9% |
| SHEL Shell plc | 2 of 9 | −3.7% | −25.0% | −57.0% | −19.1% | −6.3% | −35.9% | −19.6% | −2.6% | −53.7% | −36.2% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 6 of 9 | −3.1% | −20.5% | −47.9% | −23.6% | −10.0% | −15.0% | −19.6% | −0.3% | −33.7% | −33.6% |
| CVE Cenovus Energy Inc. | 0 of 8 | −7.1% | −40.4% | −82.3% | −37.9% | −16.4% | −42.5% | −26.3% | −0.9% | — | — |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −1.3% | −17.8% | −46.1% | −21.3% | −5.1% | −66.5% | −62.4% | 0.0% | −97.7% | −84.4% |
| YPF YPF Sociedad Anónima | 2 of 9 | −17.8% | −45.2% | −73.5% | −27.3% | −8.9% | −48.7% | −22.0% | −1.6% | −65.2% | −75.8% |
| EC Ecopetrol S.A. | 2 of 8 | −8.4% | −48.6% | −67.3% | −44.6% | −12.6% | −49.1% | −15.5% | −0.3% | — | — |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | 8 of 9 | −1.5% | −23.9% | −43.4% | −13.8% | −3.2% | −34.6% | −13.2% | 0.0% | −40.9% | −21.0% |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 3 of 9 | −6.1% | −33.0% | −61.8% | −28.3% | −9.4% | −43.4% | −19.0% | −0.8% | −62.4% | −31.7% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 5 of 9 | −2.6% | −24.9% | −51.0% | −19.6% | −5.3% | −18.5% | −17.2% | −0.1% | −43.8% | −29.5% |
| BP BP p.l.c. | 4 of 9 | −4.2% | −23.9% | −55.5% | −20.9% | −5.0% | −22.9% | −23.9% | −2.5% | −53.4% | −31.1% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −7.4% | −33.4% | −61.5% | −37.3% | −11.3% | −31.7% | −35.8% | −1.5% | −68.0% | −52.7% |
| TTE TotalEnergies SE | 3 of 9 | −4.5% | −24.6% | −49.3% | −22.2% | −5.4% | −21.5% | −26.0% | −2.1% | −50.8% | −25.1% |
| SLB Slb N.V. | 1 of 9 | −8.8% | −36.8% | −64.9% | −43.6% | −10.9% | −27.1% | −38.9% | −3.8% | −68.0% | −59.8% |
How closely does EQNR move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares EQNR with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, EQNR captured 79% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 52% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.62. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only LNG and PBR had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than EQNR's 1.51, out of 16 popular alternatives with the same record.
- LNG took just 30% of the S&P 500's losses, against 52% for EQNR, while still keeping 79% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than EQNR's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQNR This pageEquinor ASA | 79% | 52% | 1.51 | 0.62 |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 79% | 30% | 2.65 | 0.77 |
| PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 104% | 63% | 1.66 | 0.99 |
| SHEL Shell plc | 60% | 43% | 1.40 | 0.45 |
| TTE TotalEnergies SE | 69% | 57% | 1.22 | 0.51 |
| E Eni S.p.A. | 79% | 69% | 1.15 | 0.70 |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 94% | 92% | 1.02 | 0.91 |
| SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 90% | 90% | 1.00 | 0.96 |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 78% | 83% | 0.94 | 0.76 |
| BP BP p.l.c. | 58% | 62% | 0.94 | 0.51 |
| EC Ecopetrol S.A. | 127% | 139% | 0.91 | 1.13 |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 86% | 94% | 0.91 | 0.89 |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | 60% | 74% | 0.82 | 0.73 |
| CVE Cenovus Energy Inc. | 124% | 173% | 0.72 | 1.69 |
| YPF YPF Sociedad Anónima | 144% | 206% | 0.70 | 1.58 |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 92% | 135% | 0.69 | 1.17 |
| SLB Slb N.V. | 104% | 212% | 0.49 | 1.54 |
What diversifies EQNR?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with EQNR's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing EQNR with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in EQNR into SPMO would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+19.4% for EQNR alone, +21.4% for the mix).
- CAH made money in seven of the eight calendar years in which EQNR lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of EQNR over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.43 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which EQNR lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% EQNR and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2023 | 2020 | 2019 | 2015 | 2014 | 2010 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQNR Equinor ASA (this page) | 1.00 | +141% | 0.69 | −16.0% | −0.8% | −13.6% | −1.0% | −16.6% | −22.5% | −0.1% | −43.2% | 36.1% | +19.4% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.27 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +17.4% | −9.0% | +17.8% | — | — | — | — | 29.4% | +19.8% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.03 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +42.0% | +3.9% | +18.9% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | 29.1% | +22.0% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.43 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +8.0% | −13.4% | +23.4% | −25.3% | +23.8% | — | — | 30.2% | +19.4% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.37 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +1.8% | −6.5% | +20.1% | −0.3% | +12.6% | — | — | 30.0% | +18.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.14 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +73.4% | +55.5% | +64.5% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +19.0% | −44.7% | 28.7% | +25.3% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.03 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | +20.1% | +2.1% | +24.9% | +4.1% | +3.4% | — | — | 29.0% | +19.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.03 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | +12.7% | +24.8% | +17.9% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +29.3% | +4.9% | 29.0% | +20.5% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | -0.12 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +17.6% | +28.2% | +25.9% | — | — | — | — | 28.7% | +21.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2023 | 2020 | 2019 | 2015 | 2014 | 2010 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQNR Equinor ASA (this page) | 1.00 | +141% | 0.69 | −16.0% | −0.8% | −13.6% | −1.0% | −16.6% | −22.5% | −0.1% | −43.2% | 36.1% | +19.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.02 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +34.1% | +10.1% | +18.0% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +21.4% | −39.6% | 29.5% | +24.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.05 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +160% | −2.4% | −5.7% | −6.0% | +12.9% | +2.8% | −20.5% | 30.6% | +38.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | -0.07 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +79.6% | +6.7% | +15.1% | +67.7% | −10.4% | +8.7% | −15.2% | 29.6% | +34.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.20 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +24.1% | +27.1% | +26.7% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +13.8% | −40.4% | 30.3% | +23.6% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.11 | +594% | 1.36 | +103% | +37.8% | −7.2% | +83.6% | −36.3% | +50.9% | −2.8% | −67.4% | 30.4% | +26.8% |
Common questions
What was EQNR's worst drawdown?
EQNR's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 68.4%, from May to November 2008. It took about ten years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were EQNR's best and worst years?
Over 24 full calendar years, EQNR's best year was 2021, when it returned 64.6%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -43.2%.
Is there a better investment than EQNR?
Among EQNR's popular alternatives, SU, XOM and E earned more than EQNR with less volatility over the past 5 years. SU returned 33.1% a year at 32.5% volatility, against 19.2% a year at 34.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, DTM (oil & gas midstream) earned more than EQNR with less volatility over the past 5 years: 24.5% a year at 25.2% volatility, against 19.2% a year at 34.4%.
Is EQNR more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. EQNR's volatility over the past 5 years was 34.4%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, EQNR's return lands within 34.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is EQNR's Sharpe ratio?
EQNR's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.69, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so EQNR earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is EQNR with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, EQNR's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.06 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are close to unrelated, or move in opposite directions, so it can steady a stock portfolio. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against EQNR instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a EQNR holding.
What are the best alternatives to EQNR?
Of the 16 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed EQNR in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: PBR and SU.
Did EQNR outperform the S&P 500?
EQNR finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 24 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +7.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did EQNR do in stock market crashes?
EQNR fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when EQNR fell 34.9% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies EQNR?
These had a low correlation with EQNR over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.27), DXJ (correlation 0.03) and EMLP (correlation 0.43); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.02), CLS (correlation -0.05) and FIX (correlation -0.07). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than EQNR's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of EQNR's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.