Relative Intelligence · Banks

How Lloyds Banking Group (LYG) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on LYG alone. It places LYG (Lloyds Banking Group plc) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where LYG stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: LYG's full trading record, from November 2001 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowThe slide is LYG's own: it is 63.4% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. LYG has gone against the market, falling 2.5% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is LYG's own: it fell 6.7% over the past 3 months while the banks ETF IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) fell 0.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its bank peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank) rose 2.1%, while BCS (Barclays) fell 17.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, LYG rose 22.4% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (207% against 89.3%). LYG lagged its bank peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termLYG turned $10,000 into $31,300 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: LYG rose 152% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, LYG has typically fallen 1.9 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationLYG is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.49 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.49 with the total US market, more closely than 70% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- UBS (UBS Group), BAP (Credicorp) and HSBC earned more than LYG with less volatility over the past 5 years. UBS returned 25.4% a year at 30.4% volatility, against 20.3% a year at 32.1%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, capital markets) and MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, banks) earned more than LYG with less volatility over the past 5 years. CBOE returned 21.5% a year at 25.1% volatility, against 20.3% a year at 32.1%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 55 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than LYG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them XOM (Exxonmobil), ABBV (AbbVie) and HSBC.
How much would $10,000 in LYG have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in LYG over the past 24 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of LYG over the same span and LYG's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in LYG at the end of September 2002 would have grown to $8,582 by September 2026, less than the $144,215 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- All eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of LYG, and BAP finished highest, at $1,161,661.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2002 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,324 of the 1,370 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of LYG; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BAP$1M+11,517% total · +21.9% a year
- CM$270,720+2,607% total · +14.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$144,215+1,342% total · +11.8% a year
- BBVA$125,262+1,153% total · +11.1% a year
- SAN$116,215+1,062% total · +10.8% a year
- HSBC$65,857+559% total · +8.2% a year
- ING$64,785+548% total · +8.1% a year
- UBS$45,107+351% total · +6.5% a year
- DB$14,157+41.6% total · +1.5% a year
- LYG$8,582−14.2% total · −0.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 378 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of LYG; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BBVA$57,750+478% total · +42.0% a year
- HSBC$51,297+413% total · +38.7% a year
- SAN$45,493+355% total · +35.4% a year
- BAP$44,181+342% total · +34.6% a year
- NWG$38,050+281% total · +30.6% a year
- ING$35,607+256% total · +28.9% a year
- UBS$34,575+246% total · +28.2% a year
- LYG$28,578+186% total · +23.4% a year
- CM$25,433+154% total · +20.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
LYG at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- LYG is still 63.4% below its all-time high.
- LYG's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 94.8%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over 24 full calendar years, LYG's best was 2025, when it returned 104%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 77.6%. It lost money in 12 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $80B
- Industry
- Banks - Regional
- Price history from
- November 2001
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +22.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +207%+45.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- +152%+20.3% a year
- Past 10 years
- +213%+12.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +104%2025
- Worst calendar year
- −77.6%2008
- Losing years
- 12 of 24full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 32.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.74return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −94.8%Oct 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −63.4%below the peak
LYG against the whole market
Where LYG ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does LYG rank among all stocks?
This section ranks LYG on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how LYG stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- LYG's 3-year return ranks in the top 12% of the 3,017 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | LYG | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +22.4% | 1,172 of 3,287 | top 36% |
| 3-year return | +207% | 377 of 3,017 | top 12% |
| 5-year return | +152% | 444 of 2,893 | top 15% |
| 10-year return | +213% | 814 of 2,202 | top 37% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 32.1% | 920 of 2,893 | top 32% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.74 | 388 of 2,893 | top 13% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −66.5% | 1,161 of 2,187 | bottom 48% |
What has beaten LYG on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). LYG sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than LYG with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 46 stocks and nine ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than LYG over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 2% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half LYG's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 23% less than LYG's 32.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.74 for LYG.
- Among LYG's popular alternatives, HSBC, BAP and UBS are in the region. HSBC earned 33.1% a year against 20.3% a year for LYG, at 25.9% volatility, 19% less than LYG's 32.1%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to LYG; faint dots are 38 more of the 55 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than LYG?
Investments that beat LYG over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among LYG's popular alternatives, UBS, BAP and HSBC earned more than LYG with less volatility over the past 5 years. UBS returned 25.4% a year at 30.4% volatility, against 20.3% a year at 32.1%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CBOE (capital markets) and MUFG (banks) earned more than LYG with less volatility over the past 5 years. CBOE returned 21.5% a year at 25.1% volatility, against 20.3% a year at 32.1%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 55 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than LYG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them XOM, ABBV and HSBC.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat LYG over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks LYG's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than LYG follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than LYG's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× LYG's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than LYG's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with LYG?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +20.3% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −66.5% | +213% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.49 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against LYG. 12 of 18 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.49 | — | ||
BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.42 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.70 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.61 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.74 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | 0.72 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus LYG's specific themes. 20 of 129 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.11 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.44 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.57 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.42 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.22 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 426 of 3,486 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.04 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.07 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.22 | 0.48% | |
EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.55 | 0.59% | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.59 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for LYG
- Annual return
- LYG returned 20.3% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $25,200. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- LYG's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.1%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, LYG's return lands within 32.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- LYG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.74, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so LYG earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- LYG's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 66.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 66.5% fall takes a 198% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, LYG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.49 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against LYG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a LYG holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 55 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than LYG with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 52 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with LYG | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.23 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.04 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.23 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.36 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.19 | — | |
| 6 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.33 | — |
| 7 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Same or nearby category | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.11 | — |
| 8 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.20 | — |
| 9 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.22 | 0.48% |
| 10 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.46 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.17 | — | |
| 12 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.55 | 0.59% |
| 13 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.34 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.34 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.30 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.69 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.25 | — | |
| 18 | FBIZFirst Business Financial Services, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +23.1% | 29.4% | 0.85 | −50.2% | +307% | 0.45 | — |
| 19 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | -0.03 | — | |
| 20 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.47 | — |
| 21 | Same or nearby category | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.38 | — | |
| 22 | Same or nearby category | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.44 | — | |
| 23 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | 0.27 | — |
| 24 | Same or nearby category | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.57 | — | |
| 25 | ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc. · Auto Parts | Whole market | +27.3% | 29.9% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +367% | 0.29 | — |
| 26 | Popular alternative | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.49 | — | |
| 27 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Popular alternative | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.42 | — |
| 28 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.36 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.40 | — | |
| 30 | Popular alternative | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.70 | — | |
| 31 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.23 | — |
| 32 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.23 | — |
| 33 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.55 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.28 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.30 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.36 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.20 | — | |
| 38 | USFDUS Foods Holding Corp. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +22.7% | 29.8% | 0.84 | −77.3% | +347% | 0.43 | — |
| 39 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.05 | — |
| 40 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.25 | — |
| 41 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.50 | — |
| 42 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.24 | — |
| 43 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.26 | — |
| 44 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.46 | — |
| 45 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.36 | 0.19% |
| 46 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.32 | 0.40% |
| 47 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Same or nearby category | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | 0.44 | — |
| 48 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | 0.27 | 0.08% | |
| 49 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.33 | — |
| 50 | WESWestern Midstream Partners, LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +23.5% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | +128% | 0.40 | — |
| 51 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.31 | — |
| 52 | IEOiShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.5% | 29.9% | 0.80 | −75.0% | +217% | 0.18 | 0.37% |
LYG against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against LYG, compared period by period and year by year.
How do LYG's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at LYG, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Four of the 18 popular alternatives, led by HSBC, BAP and UBS, were both more rewarding and calmer than LYG over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, LYG returned 20.3% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (32.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than LYG with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | +38.7% | 33.3% |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | +33.1% | 25.9% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | +31.6% | 33.9% |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | +30.8% | 30.3% |
| NWG NatWest Group plc | +27.7% | 34.1% |
| UBS UBS Group AG | +25.4% | 30.4% |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | +24.7% | 31.1% |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | +22.1% | 37.4% |
| LYG This pageLloyds Banking Group plc | +20.3% | 32.1% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | +19.2% | 21.6% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | +18.5% | 34.1% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | +17.3% | 18.2% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | +15.8% | 20.0% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | +13.6% | 21.4% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | +12.8% | 19.9% |
| V Visa Inc. | +12.8% | 22.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | +12.4% | 23.8% |
| EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF | +11.4% | 16.4% |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | +5.2% | 25.5% |
Has LYG consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares LYG with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than LYG helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Seven of the 19 popular alternatives, led by BAP, BBVA and SAN, outperformed LYG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- BAP, BBVA and SAN outperformed LYG in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- HSBC, BAP and RY earned more for the risk they took than LYG (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than LYG over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc (this page) | — | −8.1% | −6.7% | −2.5% | +1.7% | +22.4% | +207% | +152% | +213% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −66.5% | — | $80B | — |
| BAP QualifiedCredicorp Ltd. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +0.1% | +1.0% | +21.9% | +42.9% | +61.4% | +275% | +283% | +298% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | — | $31B | — |
| BBVA QualifiedBanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −10.4% | +3.1% | +11.7% | +11.3% | +35.2% | +281% | +413% | +542% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | — | $142B | — |
| SAN QualifiedBanco Santander, S.A. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −10.2% | −1.4% | +4.5% | +9.8% | +35.9% | +305% | +295% | +332% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | — | $194B | — |
| CM QualifiedCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 5/5 short2/3 long | −2.0% | −3.3% | +4.3% | +25.8% | +44.4% | +261% | +141% | +395% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | — | $103B | — |
| UBS QualifiedUBS Group AG | 4/5 short2/3 long | −7.5% | −8.3% | +10.6% | +2.9% | +26.3% | +116% | +210% | +374% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | — | $145B | — |
| ING QualifiedING Groep N.V. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −10.7% | +2.4% | +14.0% | +18.9% | +42.5% | +209% | +201% | +339% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | — | $94B | — |
| HSBC QualifiedHSBC Holdings plc | 4/5 short2/3 long | −10.1% | −5.9% | +2.3% | +19.8% | +47.7% | +201% | +318% | +319% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | — | $324B | — |
| NWG Banks - RegionalNatWest Group plc | 2/5 short3/3 long | −9.5% | −1.4% | +5.5% | −2.1% | +20.7% | +273% | +239% | +495% | 34.1% | 0.89 | −67.4% | — | $35B | — |
| DB Banks - RegionalDeutsche Bank AG | 1/5 short2/3 long | −17.1% | −8.6% | −1.6% | −17.0% | −3.1% | +244% | +171% | +165% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −72.7% | — | $60B | — |
| BCS Banks - DiversifiedBarclays PLC | 0/5 short2/3 long | −11.7% | −17.1% | −6.2% | −13.3% | +15.1% | +242% | +134% | +238% | 34.1% | 0.67 | −66.0% | — | $75B | — |
| RY Banks - DiversifiedRoyal Bank of Canada | 5/5 short1/3 long | −3.5% | −4.8% | +12.0% | +18.9% | +39.2% | +173% | +122% | +352% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | — | $276B | — |
| TD Banks - DiversifiedThe Toronto-Dominion Bank | 5/5 short1/3 long | −0.9% | +2.1% | +16.3% | +33.1% | +57.5% | +141% | +109% | +310% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | — | $206B | — |
| BMO Banks - DiversifiedBank of Montreal | 5/5 short1/3 long | −5.5% | −5.3% | +10.8% | +29.7% | +37.6% | +146% | +89.4% | +295% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | — | $116B | — |
| MA Financial - Credit ServicesMastercard Incorporated | 4/5 short1/3 long | +9.5% | +13.5% | +20.5% | +10.9% | +10.3% | +64.3% | +79.2% | +541% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | — | $543B | — |
| V Financial - Credit ServicesVisa Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +9.9% | +13.0% | +30.0% | +18.0% | +19.0% | +78.2% | +82.5% | +429% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | — | $759B | — |
| BNS Banks - DiversifiedThe Bank of Nova Scotia | 5/5 short0/3 long | −2.3% | +6.9% | +22.4% | +28.9% | +50.0% | +162% | +83.1% | +187% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | — | $112B | — |
| EWU InternationaliShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF | 4/5 short0/3 long | +0.1% | +3.0% | +0.9% | +9.0% | +17.1% | +74.1% | +71.5% | +130% | 16.4% | 0.74 | −43.3% | 0.50% | $3.8B | — |
| PRU Insurance - LifePrudential Financial, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −2.8% | −1.2% | +15.2% | +5.2% | +19.6% | +47.5% | +29.0% | +117% | 25.5% | 0.33 | −65.9% | — | $40B | — |
| BIRK Apparel - Footwear & AccessoriesBirkenstock Holding plc | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.6% | −23.4% | −21.6% | −21.5% | −20.9% | −15.3% | — | — | — | — | −52.8% | — | $5.8B | — |
How did LYG do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2002, along with where LYG ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with LYG and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, LYG finished in the top quarter in seven of 24 years and in the bottom quarter in ten. In 2025, it ranked 4 of 20.
- LYG finished ahead of the S&P 500 in ten of its 24 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, MA came out ahead of LYG most often, in 15 of the 19 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of LYG; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places LYG among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of LYG | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYG This pageLloyds Banking Group plc | — | +104% | +20.2% | +14.5% | −9.7% | +34.6% | −36.5% | +36.9% | −28.4% | +26.8% | −25.9% | −4.4% | −12.7% | +66.1% | +104% | −61.7% | +25.4% | −27.5% | −77.5% | −11.6% | +42.9% | −1.5% | +22.5% | +25.3% | −33.0% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 24 | 4 of 20 | 10 of 20 | 12 of 19 | 14 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 19 of 19 | 3 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 9 of 19 | 18 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 16 of 19 | 3 of 19 | 1 of 19 | 19 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 18 of 19 | 17 of 18 | 14 of 17 | 4 of 16 | 15 of 16 | 9 of 16 | 16 of 16 | 15 of 16 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 14 of 24 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 17 of 24 | +65.4% | +31.4% | +16.3% | +14.6% | −24.7% | −17.7% | −0.3% | +9.0% | +37.8% | +64.9% | −38.4% | +22.3% | −7.9% | +36.3% | −6.0% | +57.5% | +58.9% | −33.2% | +91.0% | +86.8% | +50.5% | +22.0% | +51.8% | +5.5% |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 14 of 24 | +154% | +14.2% | +62.5% | +10.0% | +22.2% | −6.4% | +10.9% | −35.0% | +31.3% | −1.5% | −19.3% | −20.6% | +39.6% | +18.2% | −10.8% | −39.7% | +53.1% | −45.6% | +4.6% | +39.4% | +4.1% | +32.9% | +47.9% | −19.3% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 15 of 24 | +165% | +14.9% | +46.4% | −6.8% | +10.2% | −19.6% | −2.2% | −28.5% | +33.3% | +12.3% | −37.9% | −0.4% | +27.4% | +22.8% | −20.2% | −30.2% | +91.8% | −52.3% | +20.2% | +47.1% | +10.5% | +6.8% | +77.6% | −11.3% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 15 of 24 | +49.0% | +37.9% | +26.5% | −26.8% | +44.7% | +9.3% | +20.3% | −19.8% | +23.5% | +29.8% | −19.6% | +4.8% | +11.0% | +16.8% | −3.3% | +27.1% | +64.3% | −37.9% | −12.0% | +32.5% | +13.7% | +26.0% | +87.9% | −14.9% |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 13 of 24 | +57.6% | +0.7% | +69.8% | +7.4% | +29.4% | +19.5% | +7.1% | −29.9% | +17.4% | −14.4% | +18.1% | −10.2% | +23.3% | +34.3% | −28.2% | +6.2% | +8.5% | −68.9% | −21.5% | +32.5% | +18.2% | +27.9% | +50.4% | +1.7% |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 16 of 24 | +91.3% | +12.2% | +32.0% | −4.4% | +55.4% | −21.6% | +20.6% | −39.4% | +36.7% | +11.1% | +6.4% | −7.4% | +47.6% | +32.5% | −26.8% | −0.2% | −11.7% | −69.6% | −8.2% | +31.9% | +20.8% | +36.1% | +48.7% | −31.3% |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 14 of 24 | +67.9% | +34.5% | +39.3% | +7.8% | +20.8% | −31.7% | +1.5% | −16.1% | +35.9% | +9.9% | −11.5% | −10.2% | +8.5% | +45.9% | −22.2% | −7.5% | +22.2% | −38.0% | −4.0% | +18.9% | −1.5% | +12.6% | +52.3% | −5.2% |
| NWG NatWest Group plc | 9 of 18 | +81.0% | +92.5% | −4.8% | +8.6% | +39.4% | −24.9% | +29.1% | −26.1% | +38.0% | −37.6% | −26.8% | +6.9% | +5.0% | +69.3% | −48.3% | +31.2% | −38.1% | −90.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 12 of 24 | +133% | +29.4% | +21.4% | −5.9% | +14.7% | +40.1% | −2.9% | −56.7% | +6.4% | −25.0% | −17.7% | −36.4% | +10.9% | +19.7% | −26.1% | −20.1% | +75.4% | −65.5% | −0.6% | +42.0% | +12.3% | +9.8% | +83.6% | −34.3% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 10 of 24 | +96.5% | +76.2% | +6.0% | −21.9% | +31.6% | −12.8% | +31.9% | −29.3% | +0.5% | −12.8% | −11.4% | −14.9% | +16.1% | +61.7% | −31.9% | −4.7% | +80.0% | −73.6% | −27.2% | +44.2% | −4.0% | +31.1% | +55.0% | −23.6% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 13 of 24 | +46.3% | +23.8% | +12.2% | −8.0% | +34.1% | +8.4% | +20.2% | −12.9% | +23.9% | +31.8% | −19.3% | +6.7% | +16.0% | +23.3% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +89.3% | −39.4% | +10.7% | +26.0% | +50.7% | +15.9% | +33.6% | +15.8% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 13 of 24 | +85.3% | −13.4% | +4.5% | −12.2% | +41.3% | +5.6% | +17.5% | −12.1% | +22.9% | +30.9% | −14.9% | +5.0% | +16.1% | +16.8% | +4.1% | +22.7% | +85.4% | −46.8% | +20.4% | +16.1% | +30.7% | +29.7% | +61.4% | −11.7% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 12 of 24 | +39.6% | +3.0% | +14.6% | −12.4% | +46.9% | +3.3% | +23.9% | −14.9% | +15.4% | +32.9% | −16.8% | +10.4% | +13.7% | +17.3% | −0.3% | +13.7% | +121% | −51.9% | −0.4% | +9.4% | +20.4% | +21.0% | +62.9% | +23.0% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 15 of 19 | +9.0% | +24.2% | +23.4% | −2.7% | +1.2% | +20.2% | +59.2% | +25.3% | +47.7% | +6.9% | +13.8% | +3.7% | +70.7% | +32.1% | +66.7% | −12.2% | +79.8% | −33.4% | +119% | — | — | — | — | — |
| V Visa Inc. | 12 of 17 | +11.8% | +22.3% | +26.3% | −3.4% | −0.3% | +17.1% | +43.3% | +16.5% | +47.2% | +1.4% | +19.1% | +18.7% | +48.0% | +50.5% | +45.4% | −18.9% | +68.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 14 of 24 | +45.1% | +17.5% | +6.0% | −28.8% | +40.6% | +1.7% | +17.5% | −19.2% | +20.5% | +43.7% | −25.1% | −4.2% | +11.5% | +21.0% | −9.6% | +27.1% | +82.6% | −44.4% | +16.6% | +16.8% | +21.4% | +40.4% | +59.9% | +232% |
| EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF | 12 of 24 | +34.9% | +6.8% | +12.4% | −4.4% | +18.2% | −11.8% | +21.3% | −14.3% | +21.5% | −1.2% | −7.0% | −7.6% | +19.5% | +15.2% | −3.9% | +10.2% | +36.3% | −46.5% | +6.5% | +30.3% | +5.9% | +18.4% | +30.6% | −15.3% |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 15 of 24 | +0.2% | +19.4% | +10.1% | −3.9% | +45.3% | −11.4% | +20.1% | −26.5% | +13.6% | +32.5% | −7.4% | +0.7% | +77.1% | +9.9% | −12.1% | +20.5% | +66.8% | −66.3% | +9.7% | +18.7% | +34.5% | +33.3% | +33.4% | −3.1% |
| BIRK Birkenstock Holding plc | 0 of 2 | −27.8% | +16.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How LYG has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were LYG's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents LYG's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2001, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of LYG's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after LYG fell 55.8% from May 2002 to March 2003; it did not regain that peak until February 2006, three years later.
Green means LYG fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | LYG fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −94.8% | −54.7% | Oct 2007 | Mar 2009 | 17 months | Not yet | — |
| Dot-com bust | −55.8% | −21.9% | May 2002 | Mar 2003 | 10 months | Feb 2006 | 2.9 years |
| No named crash | −11.0% | −4.1% | Jul 2007 | Sep 2007 | 2 months | Oct 2007 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −10.8% | −5.9% | Feb 2007 | Mar 2007 | 1 month | Apr 2007 | 1 month |
| Dot-com bust | −10.5% | −0.8% | Feb 2002 | Feb 2002 | Under a month | Apr 2002 | 2 months |
How did LYG do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far LYG, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: LYG began trading on November 27, 2001, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- LYG fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when LYG fell 94.8% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, BAP held up best, falling less than LYG in eight of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- LYG began trading after the dot-com bust, but 13 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was RY's 21.6%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than LYG.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYG This pageLloyds Banking Group plc | — | −7.8% | −40.5% | −53.4% | −23.3% | −4.3% | −34.6% | −41.6% | −4.5% | −94.8% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 8 of 9 | −4.7% | −33.3% | −38.3% | −7.3% | −6.7% | −33.9% | −16.0% | −2.8% | −64.9% | −55.6% |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 6 of 9 | −10.9% | −39.6% | −47.9% | −22.7% | −5.4% | −41.0% | −32.7% | 0.0% | −75.7% | −55.9% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 5 of 9 | −11.4% | −41.0% | −48.1% | −19.0% | −6.0% | −44.7% | −33.2% | −0.9% | −76.1% | −58.4% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 8 of 9 | −7.0% | −36.2% | −43.6% | −22.2% | −5.9% | −25.3% | −12.9% | 0.0% | −71.8% | −39.8% |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 5 of 9 | −9.5% | −32.5% | −42.3% | −28.5% | −8.2% | −36.7% | −39.7% | −0.9% | −87.5% | — |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 2 of 9 | −10.7% | −43.4% | −56.9% | −24.1% | −5.8% | −35.4% | −47.4% | −3.6% | −93.0% | −66.4% |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 7 of 9 | −7.3% | −31.8% | −20.5% | −13.1% | −4.6% | −30.8% | −25.1% | 0.0% | −73.8% | −41.4% |
| NWG NatWest Group plc | 3 of 8 | −5.2% | −30.4% | −52.6% | −28.1% | −4.9% | −39.8% | −46.5% | −4.3% | — | — |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 3 of 9 | −11.6% | −54.2% | −48.6% | −36.3% | −9.3% | −54.8% | −46.8% | 0.0% | −82.7% | −64.9% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 1 of 9 | −10.2% | −48.1% | −57.1% | −22.9% | −4.1% | −50.6% | −44.9% | −4.8% | −93.9% | −38.4% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 8 of 9 | −3.8% | −26.0% | −40.0% | −17.1% | −5.7% | −23.1% | −21.8% | 0.0% | −63.1% | −21.6% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 8 of 9 | −6.7% | −29.0% | −41.0% | −20.9% | −5.5% | −18.1% | −19.6% | 0.0% | −63.4% | −44.1% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 7 of 9 | −5.5% | −30.5% | −49.4% | −23.5% | −6.2% | −18.9% | −16.4% | 0.0% | −68.5% | −26.5% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 8 of 9 | −4.0% | −28.2% | −41.0% | −21.9% | −5.8% | −20.4% | −13.8% | −3.1% | −62.7% | — |
| V Visa Inc. | 7 of 8 | −3.5% | −24.1% | −36.4% | −19.1% | −5.8% | −15.8% | −11.5% | −0.8% | — | — |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 8 of 9 | −4.6% | −35.4% | −43.0% | −17.7% | −6.1% | −24.3% | −19.8% | 0.0% | −63.8% | −23.6% |
| EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF | 8 of 9 | −2.1% | −24.9% | −40.2% | −15.3% | −5.5% | −22.4% | −20.2% | −0.5% | −64.0% | −41.6% |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −13.3% | −27.4% | −58.2% | −26.8% | −11.9% | −35.8% | −27.9% | −3.1% | −88.3% | — |
How closely does LYG move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares LYG with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 15 of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than LYG's 0.82, led by HSBC, BBVA and MA.
- V took just 79% of the S&P 500's losses, against 130% for LYG, while still keeping 93% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, LYG captured 106% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 130% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.20. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than LYG's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYG This pageLloyds Banking Group plc | 106% | 130% | 0.82 | 1.20 |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 79% | 53% | 1.49 | 0.58 |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 121% | 97% | 1.25 | 1.11 |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 105% | 88% | 1.20 | 0.95 |
| V Visa Inc. | 93% | 79% | 1.18 | 0.87 |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 97% | 88% | 1.11 | 0.88 |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 101% | 92% | 1.10 | 1.02 |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 89% | 80% | 1.10 | 0.88 |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 88% | 82% | 1.07 | 0.88 |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 108% | 106% | 1.02 | 1.07 |
| NWG NatWest Group plc | 128% | 124% | 1.02 | 1.13 |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 116% | 120% | 0.97 | 1.18 |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 104% | 112% | 0.93 | 1.12 |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 136% | 155% | 0.88 | 1.36 |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 102% | 118% | 0.86 | 1.21 |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 113% | 131% | 0.86 | 1.26 |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 97% | 120% | 0.81 | 1.05 |
| EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF | 71% | 89% | 0.80 | 0.75 |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 102% | 146% | 0.70 | 1.25 |
What diversifies LYG?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with LYG's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing LYG with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in LYG into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+23.4% for LYG alone, +24.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and SMH have moved largely independently of LYG over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.44 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in eight of the 12 calendar years in which LYG lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which LYG lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% LYG and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2018 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc (this page) | 1.00 | +152% | 0.74 | −9.7% | −36.5% | −28.4% | −25.9% | −4.4% | −12.7% | −61.7% | −27.5% | −77.5% | −11.6% | −1.5% | −33.0% | 28.6% | +23.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.22 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +3.9% | −19.8% | +1.1% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −16.1% | +2.0% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | 23.6% | +24.9% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.44 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −13.4% | −8.7% | +29.8% | −25.3% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.3% | +22.4% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.31 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | +55.5% | −9.1% | +35.6% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +6.8% | +60.5% | −44.7% | +6.0% | +10.8% | −47.0% | 25.9% | +27.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.25 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | +24.8% | −1.9% | +8.0% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +24.0% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +17.8% | — | 24.0% | +23.2% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.36 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | +28.2% | −0.9% | +7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.7% | +23.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.27 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −32.7% | −18.2% | +28.0% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +2.8% | +21.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +40.1% | −14.8% | 24.8% | +24.3% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.37 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | +31.5% | −9.9% | +17.7% | −12.9% | +7.0% | −21.8% | +73.7% | −45.3% | +6.4% | +4.7% | −24.4% | 25.3% | +23.9% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.33 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −32.3% | −12.6% | +14.9% | −25.7% | +4.8% | +10.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 24.4% | +23.1% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2018 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc (this page) | 1.00 | +152% | 0.74 | −9.7% | −36.5% | −28.4% | −25.9% | −4.4% | −12.7% | −61.7% | −27.5% | −77.5% | −11.6% | −1.5% | −33.0% | 28.6% | +23.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.19 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | +10.1% | −24.5% | −17.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +8.1% | −4.4% | −39.6% | −9.8% | +18.7% | −8.3% | 24.4% | +27.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.13 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −2.4% | −16.3% | +7.4% | −6.0% | +12.9% | −24.4% | +105% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −25.2% | −65.1% | 27.1% | +41.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.20 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +6.7% | +0.8% | +18.3% | +67.7% | −10.4% | −17.0% | +17.8% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +20.1% | −9.4% | 26.2% | +36.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.04 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +27.1% | −28.4% | −28.3% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +11.8% | +62.9% | −40.4% | +29.7% | +64.9% | −27.2% | 23.6% | +26.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.13 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −27.4% | −8.2% | +0.7% | +17.4% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.6% | +29.6% |
Common questions
What was LYG's worst drawdown?
LYG's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 94.8%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
What were LYG's best and worst years?
Over 24 full calendar years, LYG's best year was 2025, when it returned 104%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -77.6%.
Is there a better investment than LYG?
Among LYG's popular alternatives, UBS, BAP and HSBC earned more than LYG with less volatility over the past 5 years. UBS returned 25.4% a year at 30.4% volatility, against 20.3% a year at 32.1%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CBOE (capital markets) and MUFG (banks) earned more than LYG with less volatility over the past 5 years. CBOE returned 21.5% a year at 25.1% volatility, against 20.3% a year at 32.1%.
Is LYG more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. LYG's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.1%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, LYG's return lands within 32.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is LYG's Sharpe ratio?
LYG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.74, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so LYG earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is LYG with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, LYG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.49 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against LYG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a LYG holding.
What are the best alternatives to LYG?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, seven outperformed LYG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: BAP, BBVA and SAN.
Did LYG outperform the S&P 500?
LYG finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in ten of 24 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +104%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did LYG do in stock market crashes?
LYG fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when LYG fell 94.8% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies LYG?
These had a low correlation with LYG over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.22), EMLP (correlation 0.44) and SMH (correlation 0.31); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.19), CLS (correlation 0.13) and FIX (correlation 0.20). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than LYG's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of LYG's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.