Relative Intelligence · Semiconductors

How United Microelectronics (UMC) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on UMC alone. It places UMC (United Microelectronics Corporation) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where UMC stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: UMC's full trading record, from September 2000 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowUMC has run far ahead of the market, rising 58.4% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. On the flip side, it is 28.9% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?UMC fell 3.1% over the past 3 months, in line with the semiconductors ETF SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF), which fell 2.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its semiconductor peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: ADI (Analog Devices) rose 6.9%, while NXPI (NXP Semiconductors) fell 10.7%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, UMC rose 166% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (202% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termUMC turned $10,000 into $171,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. UMC's 10-year return of 1,610% puts it ahead of 98% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashUMC fell harder than the S&P 500 in five of six sell-offs. The Covid crash was the exception: UMC fell 17.1%, less than the S&P 500's 33.7%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, UMC has a correlation of 0.45 over 5 years, more closely than 63% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing) earned more than UMC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 19.9% a year at 43.2%.
- Whole market
- 189 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than UMC with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) and XOM (Exxonmobil).
How much would $10,000 in UMC have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in UMC over the past 26 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of UMC over the same span and UMC's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in UMC at the end of September 2000 would have grown to $61,692 by September 2026, less than the $84,332 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Seven of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of UMC, and LRCX finished highest, at $1,845,538.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2000 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 805 of the 1,261 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of UMC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LRCX$2M+18,355% total · +22.2% a year
- KLAC$906,690+8,967% total · +18.9% a year
- TSM$885,827+8,758% total · +18.8% a year
- ASML$501,165+4,912% total · +16.2% a year
- AMAT$238,716+2,287% total · +13.0% a year
- TXN$97,586+876% total · +9.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$84,332+743% total · +8.5% a year
- ADI$79,170+692% total · +8.3% a year
- UMC$61,692+517% total · +7.2% a year
- TSEM$6,892−31.1% total · −1.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 393 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of UMC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AVGO$79,117+691% total · +51.2% a year
- TSEM$76,064+661% total · +50.0% a year
- ASX$70,798+608% total · +47.9% a year
- KLAC$61,203+512% total · +43.7% a year
- LRCX$60,701+507% total · +43.4% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- AMAT$41,406+314% total · +32.9% a year
- UMC$28,085+181% total · +22.9% a year
- ADI$25,751+158% total · +20.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
UMC at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- UMC is still 28.9% below its all-time high.
- UMC's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 86.0%, from September 2000 to October 2008. It took about 12 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 25 full calendar years, UMC's best was 2020, when it returned 232%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 58.0%. It lost money in 13 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $49B
- Industry
- Semiconductors
- Price history from
- September 2000
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +166%total return
- Past 3 years
- +202%+44.6% a year
- Past 5 years
- +147%+19.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,610%+32.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +232%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −58.0%2002
- Losing years
- 13 of 25full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 43.2%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.63return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −86.0%Sep 2000 to Oct 2008
- From its all-time high
- −28.9%below the peak
UMC against the whole market
Where UMC ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does UMC rank among all stocks?
This section ranks UMC on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how UMC stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- UMC's 1-year return ranks in the top 2% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | UMC | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +166% | 60 of 3,287 | top 2% |
| 3-year return | +202% | 399 of 3,017 | top 13% |
| 5-year return | +147% | 459 of 2,893 | top 16% |
| 10-year return | +1,610% | 53 of 2,202 | top 2% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 43.2% | 1,619 of 2,893 | bottom 45% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.63 | 600 of 2,893 | top 21% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −54.3% | 639 of 2,187 | top 29% |
What has beaten UMC on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). UMC sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than UMC with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 167 stocks and 22 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than UMC over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 5% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half UMC's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 43% less than UMC's 43.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.63 for UMC. INSW earned the most, 56.5% a year, while still swinging less than UMC (40.5% against 43.2%).
- Among UMC's popular alternatives, TSM is in the region. TSM earned 31.5% a year against 19.9% a year for UMC, at 38.5% volatility, 11% less than UMC's 43.2%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to UMC; faint dots are 92 more of the 189 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than UMC?
Investments that beat UMC over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among UMC's popular alternatives, TSM earned more than UMC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 19.9% a year at 43.2%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, SMH (semiconductors) earned more than UMC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 33.4% a year at 36.9% volatility, against 19.9% a year at 43.2%.
- Across the whole market, 189 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than UMC with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them TSM, LLY and XOM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat UMC over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks UMC's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than UMC follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than UMC's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× UMC's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than UMC's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with UMC?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +19.9% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | +1,610% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.45 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against UMC. 6 of 18 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.71 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +2,534% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.52 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +25.8% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | +1,488% | 0.60 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Semiconductors and the categories next to it (Semiconductor Equipment, Computer Hardware, Communications Equipment, Software), plus UMC's specific themes. 15 of 128 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.72 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.54 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.52 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +5,243% | 0.81 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +35.7% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | +7,583% | 0.65 | — | ||
MTSIMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. · Semiconductors | Higher return, similar volatility | +32.1% | 47.3% | 0.83 | −80.8% | +588% | 0.61 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 306 of 3,487 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +1,196% | 0.15 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.02 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.12 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.16 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.32 | 0.48% | |
KRTKarat Packaging Inc. · Packaging & Containers | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +25.4% | 44.1% | 0.74 | −48.4% | — | 0.02 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | -0.08 | — | ||
FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.76 | 0.19% | |
What these numbers mean for UMC
- Annual return
- UMC returned 19.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $24,700. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- UMC's volatility over the past 5 years was 43.2%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, UMC's return lands within 43.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- UMC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.63, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so UMC earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- UMC's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 54.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 54.3% fall takes a 119% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, UMC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.45 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against UMC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a UMC holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 189 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than UMC with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with UMC | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +1,196% | 0.15 | — |
| 2 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.02 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.12 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.16 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.03 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.08 | — | |
| 7 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.32 | 0.48% |
| 8 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.39 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.22 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.14 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.44 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.19 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.19 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.23 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.07 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.30 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.10 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.03 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.32 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | -0.07 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.21 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +510% | 0.17 | — | |
| 23 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.08 | — |
| 24 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.12 | — |
| 25 | Whole market | +24.1% | 39.9% | 0.74 | −38.2% | — | 0.02 | — | |
| 26 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | -0.04 | — |
| 27 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.37 | — |
| 28 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.04 | — |
| 29 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.25 | — |
| 30 | CAKEThe Cheesecake Factory Incorporated · Restaurants | Whole market | +25.8% | 39.9% | 0.78 | −75.6% | +187% | 0.21 | — |
| 31 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.29 | — |
| 32 | CHEFThe Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +27.5% | 39.8% | 0.81 | −91.3% | +787% | 0.21 | — |
| 33 | HUBBHubbell Incorporated · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +21.0% | 30.0% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +442% | 0.08 | — |
| 34 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.09 | — |
| 35 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | -0.06 | — | |
| 36 | ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc. · Auto Parts | Whole market | +27.3% | 29.9% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +367% | 0.02 | — |
| 37 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | -0.10 | — |
| 38 | Same or nearby category | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.72 | 0.35% | |
| 39 | SNEXStoneX Group Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +33.0% | 37.3% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +670% | 0.23 | — |
| 40 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.25 | — |
| 41 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.18 | — | |
| 42 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | 0.18 | — |
| 43 | FSSFederal Signal Corporation · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +23.3% | 31.7% | 0.82 | −33.0% | +882% | 0.12 | — |
| 44 | TFPMTriple Flag Precious Metals Corp. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +29.3% | 37.7% | 0.87 | −36.2% | — | -0.01 | — |
| 45 | ACAArcosa, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +23.1% | 34.0% | 0.78 | −36.8% | — | 0.24 | — |
| 46 | ESEESCO Technologies Inc. · Electronic Instruments | Whole market | +24.2% | 31.1% | 0.85 | −46.0% | +473% | 0.31 | — |
| 47 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.26 | — |
| 48 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.76 | 0.19% |
| 49 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.69 | 0.40% |
| 50 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +1,050% | -0.03 | — |
| 51 | USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +803% | -0.08 | — |
| 52 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.02 | — | |
| 53 | HWKNHawkins, Inc. · Chemicals - Specialty | Whole market | +29.1% | 36.5% | 0.89 | −44.8% | +627% | 0.05 | — |
| 54 | SOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Whole market | +28.3% | 38.9% | 0.84 | −46.0% | — | 0.76 | 0.19% |
| 55 | SIISprott Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +24.9% | 39.2% | 0.76 | −49.2% | +786% | 0.17 | — |
| 56 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | -0.15 | — | |
| 57 | ODCOil-Dri Corporation of America · Chemicals - Specialty | Whole market | +35.9% | 36.9% | 1.02 | −48.9% | +460% | 0.27 | — |
| 58 | NWPXNWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +32.5% | 36.2% | 0.96 | −46.5% | +682% | 0.48 | — |
| 59 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.44 | 0.45% |
| 60 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.23 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.35 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.17 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.07 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | -0.18 | — | |
| 65 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.04 | — |
| 66 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.21 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | 0.30 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.17 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.20 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.40 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | -0.03 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.24 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.12 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | -0.20 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | -0.01 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +26.5% | 32.5% | 0.89 | −77.5% | +433% | -0.12 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.19 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.08 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | 0.09 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.21 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | -0.03 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +352% | 0.07 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +339% | 0.37 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | -0.07 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.25 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.21 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.16 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | -0.30 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +26.5% | 39.4% | 0.80 | −89.2% | +163% | -0.06 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +24.3% | 39.1% | 0.75 | −63.3% | +1,270% | 0.28 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | -0.09 | 0.08% | |
| 92 | Whole market | +22.1% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −72.7% | +165% | 0.24 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +21.7% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | +569% | 0.25 | — | |
| 94 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.25 | — |
| 95 | Whole market | +25.3% | 34.4% | 0.83 | −64.1% | +390% | 0.16 | — | |
| 96 | STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +32.2% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | +1,018% | 0.27 | — |
| 97 | NWGNatWest Group plc · Banks | Whole market | +27.7% | 34.1% | 0.89 | −67.4% | +495% | 0.24 | — |
| 98 | JBLJabil Inc. · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +35.8% | 39.6% | 0.97 | −57.3% | +1,264% | 0.40 | — |
| 99 | SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP · Water Utilities | Whole market | +39.1% | 37.1% | 1.08 | −62.0% | +293% | 0.12 | — |
| 100 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.09 | — |
UMC against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against UMC, compared period by period and year by year.
How do UMC's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at UMC, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only ASX and TSM were both more rewarding and calmer than UMC over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, UMC returned 19.9% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (43.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than UMC with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| ASX ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | +48.9% | 43.0% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd. | +42.4% | 52.2% |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | +38.7% | 46.7% |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | +37.4% | 49.9% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | +25.8% | 47.4% |
| UMC This pageUnited Microelectronics Corporation | +19.9% | 43.2% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | +19.5% | 34.1% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | +17.3% | 43.4% |
| AMKR Amkor Technology, Inc. | +14.1% | 56.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | +12.4% | 55.6% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | +10.7% | 55.9% |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | +10.3% | 47.2% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | +9.9% | 33.7% |
| HIMX Himax Technologies, Inc. | +8.6% | 62.8% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | +5.7% | 42.3% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | +2.5% | 45.9% |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | +2.2% | 47.7% |
Has UMC consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares UMC with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than UMC helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 19 popular alternatives, ASX, outperformed UMC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- ASX, AVGO and KLAC earned more for the risk they took than UMC (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- AVGO outperformed UMC over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so UMC has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than UMC over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation (this page) | — | −22.7% | −3.1% | +58.4% | +155% | +166% | +202% | +147% | +1,610% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | — | $49B | — |
| ASX QualifiedASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −6.8% | +10.5% | +40.6% | +144% | +217% | +469% | +631% | +967% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | — | $90B | — |
| LRCX SemiconductorsLam Research Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −12.8% | −14.0% | +0.3% | +42.8% | +83.7% | +350% | +390% | +2,989% | 49.9% | 0.89 | −56.4% | — | $330B | — |
| KLAC SemiconductorsKLA Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −12.1% | −22.0% | −10.2% | +27.4% | +41.0% | +258% | +413% | +2,534% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | — | $211B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| TSM SemiconductorsTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 2/5 short2/3 long | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| AMAT SemiconductorsApplied Materials, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −12.8% | −22.9% | +3.7% | +51.2% | +78.5% | +209% | +215% | +1,488% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | — | $321B | — |
| TSEM SemiconductorsTower Semiconductor Ltd. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −21.4% | −19.1% | −18.1% | +51.0% | +144% | +737% | +487% | +1,058% | 52.2% | 0.93 | −62.3% | — | $21B | — |
| ADI SemiconductorsAnalog Devices, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +3.7% | +6.9% | +4.8% | +46.3% | +63.3% | +150% | +144% | +652% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | — | $192B | — |
| TXN SemiconductorsTexas Instruments Incorporated | 2/5 short0/3 long | +2.6% | −1.7% | +20.1% | +59.1% | +58.7% | +105% | +60.5% | +424% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | — | $254B | — |
| ASML SemiconductorsASML Holding N.V. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −4.7% | −6.1% | +10.8% | +40.8% | +57.5% | +188% | +123% | +1,628% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | — | $630B | — |
| ON SemiconductorsON Semiconductor Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.4% | −12.8% | −11.6% | +33.4% | +37.8% | −10.9% | +66.0% | +540% | 55.9% | 0.46 | −70.4% | — | $29B | — |
| STM SemiconductorsSTMicroelectronics N.V. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −11.2% | −25.8% | +3.3% | +68.2% | +52.9% | +18.8% | +11.6% | +525% | 47.7% | 0.28 | −66.6% | — | $41B | — |
| AMKR SemiconductorsAmkor Technology, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −20.1% | −33.2% | −39.8% | −2.4% | +30.1% | +97.6% | +93.5% | +363% | 56.2% | 0.52 | −65.9% | — | $10B | — |
| MCHP SemiconductorsMicrochip Technology Incorporated | 1/5 short0/3 long | +1.4% | −5.2% | −4.6% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +8.5% | +13.0% | +207% | 45.9% | 0.28 | −63.8% | — | $41B | — |
| NXPI SemiconductorsNXP Semiconductors N.V. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.2% | −10.7% | +8.2% | +8.8% | +10.0% | +34.9% | +31.9% | +159% | 42.3% | 0.34 | −53.3% | — | $60B | — |
| VSH SemiconductorsVishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −12.4% | −23.3% | +9.0% | +88.8% | +66.1% | +32.0% | +62.9% | +146% | 47.2% | 0.44 | −63.5% | — | $4.0B | — |
| HIMX SemiconductorsHimax Technologies, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −18.9% | −6.6% | +9.7% | +41.4% | +26.6% | +135% | +51.0% | +105% | 62.8% | 0.44 | −86.7% | — | $2.1B | — |
| GFS SemiconductorsGLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.0% | −17.0% | −19.7% | +28.0% | +32.7% | −13.2% | — | — | — | — | −61.5% | — | $26B | — |
| INTC SemiconductorsIntel Corp. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −24.7% | −5.5% | +39.6% | +133% | +141% | +167% | +79.8% | +219% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | — | $485B | — |
How did UMC do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2001, along with where UMC ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with UMC and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Among its popular alternatives, AVGO came out ahead of UMC most often, in 14 of the 16 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, UMC finished in the top quarter in two of 25 years and in the bottom quarter in eight. In 2025, it ranked 12 of 20.
- UMC finished ahead of the S&P 500 in ten of its 25 full calendar years.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of UMC; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places UMC among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of UMC | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMC This pageUnited Microelectronics Corporation | — | +28.7% | −19.0% | +39.0% | −40.3% | +43.1% | +232% | +55.4% | −21.9% | +42.2% | −2.7% | −13.2% | +15.2% | +5.7% | −2.8% | −26.9% | −16.8% | +98.2% | −37.7% | −28.9% | +15.3% | −2.2% | −23.6% | +52.9% | −58.0% | +33.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 2 of 25 | 12 of 20 | 13 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 17 of 20 | 11 of 19 | 1 of 19 | 10 of 19 | 11 of 19 | 10 of 19 | 17 of 19 | 16 of 19 | 14 of 19 | 17 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 18 of 18 | 6 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 17 of 17 | 8 of 16 | 12 of 16 | 8 of 16 | 14 of 16 | 15 of 16 | 6 of 16 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 14 of 25 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% |
| ASX ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | 17 of 25 | +65.7% | +10.1% | +60.7% | −13.0% | +38.3% | +8.1% | +53.7% | −37.2% | +33.6% | −7.4% | −1.4% | +32.5% | +17.0% | +1.3% | −23.4% | +31.1% | +156% | −63.2% | −9.1% | +25.8% | +20.1% | −25.6% | +73.3% | −33.5% | +43.0% |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 18 of 25 | +139% | −6.9% | +88.6% | −40.7% | +53.7% | +64.2% | +119% | −24.4% | +75.1% | +35.3% | +1.5% | +46.5% | +51.0% | −2.5% | −28.5% | +31.9% | +84.1% | −50.7% | −14.6% | +41.6% | +23.5% | −10.5% | +199% | −53.4% | +59.7% |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 20 of 25 | +94.5% | +9.4% | +56.0% | −11.2% | +68.1% | +47.9% | +104% | −12.4% | +36.7% | +17.0% | +2.1% | +39.4% | +39.0% | +2.1% | +28.8% | +9.9% | +69.8% | −53.5% | −2.7% | +1.9% | +6.2% | −20.3% | +65.8% | −28.7% | +46.6% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 14 of 16 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% | +46.1% | +93.4% | +70.0% | +12.0% | +3.0% | +55.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 20 of 25 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +52.9% | −16.1% | −4.3% | +18.9% | +27.1% | −4.2% | +56.7% | −54.8% | +39.5% |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 17 of 25 | +59.6% | +1.1% | +68.0% | −37.5% | +83.6% | +43.3% | +89.9% | −34.9% | +59.8% | +75.7% | −23.5% | +43.7% | +58.6% | +10.2% | −21.9% | +3.0% | +40.4% | −42.1% | −2.6% | +3.8% | +5.4% | −23.8% | +72.3% | −35.0% | +5.0% |
| TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd. | 15 of 25 | +128% | +68.8% | −29.3% | +8.9% | +53.7% | +7.3% | +63.2% | −56.8% | +79.1% | +35.4% | +5.5% | +128% | −26.5% | −15.9% | −55.3% | +45.4% | +617% | −90.3% | −18.7% | +17.9% | −35.8% | −71.4% | +145% | −49.1% | −40.1% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 14 of 25 | +29.8% | +8.8% | +23.4% | −4.9% | +21.0% | +26.9% | +41.3% | −1.6% | +25.3% | +35.0% | +2.4% | +12.2% | +24.7% | +21.2% | −2.4% | +22.7% | +71.5% | −38.0% | −1.5% | −6.7% | −1.9% | −18.7% | +91.4% | −46.2% | −13.3% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 16 of 25 | −4.5% | +13.1% | +6.4% | −9.9% | +17.5% | +31.7% | +39.6% | −7.2% | +46.8% | +36.7% | +5.1% | +25.1% | +46.3% | +7.9% | −8.8% | +27.0% | +72.0% | −52.8% | +17.0% | −9.8% | +30.7% | −15.9% | +96.6% | −46.2% | −40.8% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 19 of 25 | +55.8% | −7.7% | +39.9% | −30.5% | +64.1% | +66.3% | +93.2% | −9.7% | +56.5% | +27.9% | −17.1% | +16.2% | +46.9% | +19.7% | +10.4% | +13.2% | +90.9% | −41.4% | +22.3% | +22.7% | +26.1% | −20.6% | +140% | −51.0% | −24.4% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 16 of 25 | −14.1% | −24.5% | +33.9% | −8.2% | +108% | +34.3% | +47.7% | −21.1% | +64.1% | +30.2% | −3.3% | +22.9% | +16.9% | −8.7% | −21.9% | +12.0% | +159% | −61.7% | +17.3% | +36.9% | +21.8% | −29.9% | +373% | −33.8% | −60.6% |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 11 of 25 | +5.3% | −49.6% | +41.6% | −26.8% | +32.4% | +38.9% | +96.4% | −35.7% | +95.1% | +76.9% | −6.7% | −2.5% | +15.2% | +30.1% | −40.6% | +15.9% | +43.9% | −52.3% | −21.1% | +2.9% | −6.1% | −28.1% | +39.0% | −38.3% | −26.0% |
| AMKR Amkor Technology, Inc. | 13 of 25 | +55.9% | −20.8% | +40.4% | −2.3% | +65.5% | +16.4% | +98.2% | −34.7% | −4.8% | +73.4% | −14.3% | +15.8% | +44.5% | −2.7% | −41.2% | +3.5% | +229% | −74.5% | −8.7% | +66.9% | −16.2% | −63.2% | +281% | −70.3% | +3.3% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 13 of 25 | +14.6% | −34.9% | +30.9% | −18.0% | +27.5% | +33.7% | +48.1% | −16.7% | +39.5% | +41.6% | +6.3% | +4.0% | +42.4% | −7.1% | +10.3% | +24.6% | +57.8% | −34.8% | −0.7% | +4.4% | +22.6% | −19.9% | +36.8% | −5.1% | +76.5% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 10 of 15 | +6.4% | −8.0% | +48.4% | −29.2% | +44.8% | +26.6% | +75.7% | −37.0% | +19.5% | +16.3% | +10.3% | +66.3% | +74.5% | +71.2% | −26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 10 of 25 | −12.2% | −27.9% | +13.0% | +0.7% | +7.4% | −0.5% | +20.6% | −11.9% | +30.0% | +37.1% | −13.1% | +8.5% | +24.7% | +18.2% | −38.8% | +124% | +144% | −70.0% | −15.7% | −1.6% | −8.3% | −34.5% | +105% | −42.6% | +28.9% |
| HIMX Himax Technologies, Inc. | 8 of 19 | +5.9% | +37.2% | +4.7% | −54.9% | +120% | +179% | −22.7% | −66.6% | +77.5% | −25.4% | +5.3% | −42.7% | +544% | +149% | −55.2% | −7.2% | +88.3% | −59.9% | −6.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 1 of 4 | −18.6% | −29.2% | +12.4% | −17.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 13 of 25 | +84.0% | −59.6% | +94.5% | −46.6% | +6.0% | −14.7% | +30.7% | +4.2% | +30.9% | +8.7% | −2.2% | +44.3% | +30.9% | −12.0% | +19.4% | +6.3% | +43.9% | −43.5% | +34.2% | −17.2% | +8.1% | −26.6% | +107% | −50.3% | +4.9% |
Risk and diversification
How UMC has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were UMC's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents UMC's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2000, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of UMC's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: UMC fell 38.1% from June to July 2026, while the S&P 500 slipped only 0.5%.
- The slowest recovery came after UMC fell 86.0% from September 2000 to October 2008; it did not regain that peak until November 2020, 12 years later.
Green means UMC fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | UMC fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −86.0% | −33.6% | Sep 2000 | Oct 2008 | 8.1 years | Nov 2020 | 12.1 years |
| 2022 bear market | −54.3% | −22.4% | Dec 2021 | Oct 2022 | 10 months | Jan 2026 | 3.3 years |
| No named crash | −38.1% | −0.5% | Jun 2026 | Jul 2026 | 1 month | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −31.1% | −8.9% | Jan 2026 | Mar 2026 | 2 months | Apr 2026 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −26.9% | −0.5% | Apr 2021 | May 2021 | 1 month | Aug 2021 | 3 months |
How did UMC do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far UMC, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: UMC began trading on September 19, 2000, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than UMC in most of the crashes they both traded through.
- UMC began trading after the dot-com bust, but 13 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MCHP's 58.7%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
- UMC fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when UMC fell 51.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than UMC.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMC This pageUnited Microelectronics Corporation | — | −2.0% | −51.0% | −17.1% | −36.2% | −4.4% | −16.6% | −24.9% | 0.0% | −63.0% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ASX ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | 2 of 9 | −4.7% | −37.4% | −36.5% | −25.1% | −8.0% | −19.3% | −26.2% | 0.0% | −75.3% | — |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 2 of 9 | −3.3% | −55.1% | −43.7% | −22.9% | −9.5% | −20.5% | −20.1% | −2.2% | −73.3% | −87.9% |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 4 of 9 | −5.9% | −37.6% | −33.8% | −21.6% | −7.5% | −13.5% | −23.0% | −2.8% | −71.8% | −73.2% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 2 of 8 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 4 of 9 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −3.6% | −54.2% | −43.6% | −26.4% | −9.7% | −18.8% | −24.5% | −1.6% | −61.7% | −82.0% |
| TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd. | 3 of 9 | −1.0% | −21.7% | −39.0% | −39.6% | −3.3% | −30.9% | −44.6% | 0.0% | −94.2% | −91.5% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −2.6% | −22.6% | −33.6% | −18.1% | −7.2% | −22.7% | −18.6% | −1.2% | −55.0% | −82.0% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 4 of 9 | −2.6% | −21.7% | −29.8% | −19.5% | −9.3% | −18.4% | −21.6% | −1.3% | −61.4% | −85.4% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 3 of 9 | −2.9% | −48.4% | −37.9% | −24.4% | −7.5% | −22.1% | −17.7% | −2.7% | −64.1% | −90.0% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 2 of 9 | −6.4% | −34.0% | −59.6% | −23.7% | −12.2% | −39.2% | −28.5% | 0.0% | −80.0% | — |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 2 of 9 | −3.2% | −40.6% | −49.6% | −31.0% | −9.1% | −31.6% | −36.9% | −3.2% | −77.2% | −83.5% |
| AMKR Amkor Technology, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −5.9% | −39.9% | −55.5% | −26.5% | −9.3% | −25.1% | −33.8% | −0.8% | −87.5% | −98.2% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 4 of 9 | −3.8% | −35.3% | −49.0% | −25.9% | −14.4% | −18.6% | −12.7% | −0.4% | −55.2% | −58.7% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 2 of 7 | −4.2% | −38.8% | −52.0% | −27.4% | −4.0% | −35.5% | −39.8% | — | — | — |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −2.4% | −22.2% | −42.4% | −21.6% | −20.8% | −16.4% | −46.6% | −2.0% | −84.8% | −88.5% |
| HIMX Himax Technologies, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −5.4% | −56.8% | −61.3% | −51.5% | −9.8% | −27.2% | −42.2% | −1.4% | −82.2% | — |
| GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 0 of 2 | −5.1% | −50.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 4 of 9 | −1.0% | −54.1% | −33.5% | −13.0% | −6.7% | −19.7% | −16.2% | −0.9% | −55.2% | −82.3% |
How closely does UMC move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares UMC with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, UMC captured 133% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 52% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.33. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only KLAC had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than UMC's 2.56, out of 18 popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than UMC's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMC This pageUnited Microelectronics Corporation | 133% | 52% | 2.56 | 1.33 |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 152% | 59% | 2.57 | 1.32 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 183% | 104% | 1.75 | 1.56 |
| ASX ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | 126% | 79% | 1.59 | 1.38 |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 152% | 97% | 1.58 | 1.51 |
| TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd. | 143% | 95% | 1.50 | 1.11 |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 170% | 132% | 1.29 | 1.44 |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 117% | 92% | 1.26 | 1.20 |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 122% | 104% | 1.17 | 1.72 |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 113% | 108% | 1.04 | 1.18 |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 98% | 100% | 0.98 | 1.43 |
| AMKR Amkor Technology, Inc. | 152% | 174% | 0.88 | 1.94 |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 161% | 185% | 0.87 | 1.95 |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 127% | 170% | 0.75 | 1.72 |
| VSH Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 118% | 160% | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 115% | 157% | 0.73 | 1.63 |
| HIMX Himax Technologies, Inc. | 133% | 197% | 0.68 | 2.12 |
What diversifies UMC?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with UMC's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing UMC with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in UMC into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+22.9% for UMC alone, +28.3% for the mix).
- FIX made money in ten of the 13 calendar years in which UMC lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of UMC over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.32 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which UMC lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% UMC and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2016 | 2015 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +147% | 0.63 | −19.0% | −40.3% | −21.9% | −2.7% | −13.2% | −2.8% | −26.9% | −16.8% | −37.7% | −28.9% | −2.2% | −23.6% | −58.0% | 54.0% | +22.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.18 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43.6% | +23.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.32 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +1.1% | +7.7% | +19.6% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | 44.1% | +25.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.08 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +10.4% | −8.7% | +29.8% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43.6% | +23.7% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.16 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +7.1% | −3.0% | +15.9% | −0.3% | +9.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43.8% | +22.9% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.45 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | −5.1% | −9.5% | +6.3% | +4.1% | +20.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 44.3% | +22.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.07 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | +8.0% | −10.7% | +6.6% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +17.8% | — | — | 43.6% | +24.4% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.09 | +177% | 0.93 | +5.6% | +64.4% | −18.2% | +28.0% | −21.5% | +5.2% | +2.8% | +21.9% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +40.1% | +33.8% | −14.8% | 43.1% | +26.1% |
| VTV Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 0.35 | +76.6% | 0.90 | +16.0% | −2.1% | −5.5% | +17.1% | −1.0% | +15.2% | +1.1% | +14.5% | −35.9% | −0.1% | +7.2% | — | — | 44.3% | +22.7% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2016 | 2015 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +147% | 0.63 | −19.0% | −40.3% | −21.9% | −2.7% | −13.2% | −2.8% | −26.9% | −16.8% | −37.7% | −28.9% | −2.2% | −23.6% | −58.0% | 54.0% | +22.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.12 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +54.1% | −24.5% | −17.5% | +12.6% | +3.8% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −39.6% | −9.8% | +18.7% | −4.7% | −8.3% | 44.2% | +28.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.08 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +1.3% | −16.3% | +7.4% | −6.0% | +11.2% | −24.4% | +2.8% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −25.2% | −6.4% | −65.1% | 45.7% | +42.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.22 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +17.0% | +0.8% | +18.3% | +67.7% | +15.7% | −17.0% | +8.7% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +20.1% | +40.0% | −9.4% | 46.0% | +37.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.14 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −28.3% | −4.5% | +25.6% | +11.8% | +13.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | +64.9% | −1.4% | −27.2% | 42.8% | +28.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.02 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +0.7% | +17.4% | +94.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43.8% | +31.0% |
Common questions
What was UMC's worst drawdown?
UMC's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 86.0%, from September 2000 to October 2008. It took about 12 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were UMC's best and worst years?
Over 25 full calendar years, UMC's best year was 2020, when it returned 232%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -58.0%.
Is there a better investment than UMC?
Among UMC's popular alternatives, TSM earned more than UMC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 19.9% a year at 43.2%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, SMH (semiconductors) earned more than UMC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 33.4% a year at 36.9% volatility, against 19.9% a year at 43.2%.
Is UMC more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. UMC's volatility over the past 5 years was 43.2%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, UMC's return lands within 43.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is UMC's Sharpe ratio?
UMC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.63, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so UMC earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is UMC with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, UMC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.45 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against UMC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a UMC holding.
What are the best alternatives to UMC?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed UMC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ASX.
Did UMC outperform the S&P 500?
UMC finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in ten of 25 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +28.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did UMC do in stock market crashes?
UMC fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when UMC fell 51.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies UMC?
These had a low correlation with UMC over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.18), DXJ (correlation 0.32) and EMLP (correlation 0.08); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.12), CLS (correlation 0.08) and FIX (correlation 0.22). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than UMC's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of UMC's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.