Relative Intelligence · Computer Hardware

How Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on HPE alone. It places HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where HPE stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: HPE's full trading record, from October 2015 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, HPE rose 103% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. On the flip side, HPE is 23.6% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?HPE's 26.3% gain over the past 3 months far outran its industry: the computer hardware ETF VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) rose 6.3%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its computer hardware peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SMCI (Super Micro Computer) rose 36.3%, while CSCO (Cisco Systems) fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsHPE has run far ahead of the market, rising 150% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (296% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termHPE turned $10,000 into $58,300 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. HPE's 10-year return of 483% puts it ahead of 85% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, HPE held up better than CSCO (Cisco Systems), DELL and ANET; only IBM (International Business Machines) fell less. Even so, HPE fell further than the S&P 500 in three of the last three sell-offs, including the Covid crash (45.3% against 33.7%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, HPE has a correlation of 0.56 over 5 years, more closely than 84% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, HPE's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.31: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.2 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.0 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- AVGO (Broadcom) earned more for the risk it took than HPE over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 48.3%, against 56.9% for HPE.
- Nearby categories and themes
- ASX (ASE Technology Holding, semiconductors) earned more than HPE over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 48.8% a year at 43.0% volatility, against 32.9% a year at 42.2%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 29 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HPE with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY (Eli Lilly and Company), GE (GE Aerospace) and PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras).
How much would $10,000 in HPE have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in HPE over the past 10 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of HPE over the same span and HPE's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: HPE began trading on October 19, 2015, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 10 years of HPE's record, starting at the end of September 2016.
- $10,000 invested in HPE at the end of September 2016 would have grown to $63,955 by September 2026, more than the $41,286 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- All eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of HPE, and NVDA finished highest, at $1,367,620.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2016 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 266 of the 2,697 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of HPE; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$1M+13,576% total · +63.5% a year
- AMD$885,314+8,753% total · +56.6% a year
- QUBT$610,560+6,006% total · +50.9% a year
- DELL$441,783+4,318% total · +46.1% a year
- STX$346,866+3,369% total · +42.6% a year
- AVGO$261,904+2,519% total · +38.6% a year
- SMCI$175,515+1,655% total · +33.2% a year
- WDC$116,171+1,062% total · +27.8% a year
- HPE$63,955+540% total · +20.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$41,286+313% total · +15.2% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 114 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of HPE; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- STX$128,799+1,188% total · +66.7% a year
- DELL$112,363+1,024% total · +62.2% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- AVGO$79,117+691% total · +51.2% a year
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- ASX$70,798+608% total · +47.9% a year
- AMD$59,452+495% total · +42.8% a year
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- HPE$51,318+413% total · +38.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
HPE at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: HPE began trading on October 19, 2015, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- HPE is still 23.6% below its all-time high.
- HPE's deepest decline since it began trading in 2015 was 56.9%, from March 2018 to March 2020. It took 22 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over ten full calendar years, HPE's best was 2016, when it returned 54.2%, and its worst was 2020, when it lost 21.9%. It lost money in two of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $74B
- Industry
- Computer Hardware
- Price history from
- October 2015
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +150%total return
- Past 3 years
- +296%+58.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +315%+32.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- +483%+19.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +54.2%2016
- Worst calendar year
- −21.9%2020
- Losing years
- 2 of 10full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 42.2%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.89return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −56.9%Mar 2018 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −23.6%below the peak
HPE against the whole market
Where HPE ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does HPE rank among all stocks?
This section ranks HPE on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how HPE stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- HPE's 1-year return ranks in the top 2% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | HPE | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +150% | 73 of 3,287 | top 2% |
| 3-year return | +296% | 228 of 3,017 | top 8% |
| 5-year return | +315% | 155 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| 10-year return | +483% | 323 of 2,202 | top 15% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 42.2% | 1,564 of 2,893 | bottom 47% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.89 | 183 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −56.9% | 757 of 2,187 | top 35% |
What has beaten HPE on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). HPE sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than HPE with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 29 stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than HPE over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half HPE's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 41% less than HPE's 42.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.89 for HPE. PBR-A earned the most, 51.8% a year, while still swinging less than HPE (37.5% against 42.2%).
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to HPE; faint dots are 23 more of the 29 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than HPE?
Investments that beat HPE over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among HPE's popular alternatives, AVGO earned more for the risk it took than HPE over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 48.3%, against 56.9% for HPE.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ASX (semiconductors) earned more than HPE over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 48.8% a year at 43.0% volatility, against 32.9% a year at 42.2%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 29 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HPE with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, GE and PBR.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat HPE over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks HPE's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than HPE follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than HPE's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× HPE's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than HPE's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with HPE?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.56 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against HPE. 2 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.70 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Computer Hardware and the categories next to it (Semiconductors, Communications Equipment, Software, IT Services), plus HPE's specific themes. 6 of 140 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.37 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.15 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +1,139% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +7.2% | 42.3% | 0.39 | −43.0% | +656% | 0.27 | — | ||
UIUbiquiti Inc. · Communications Equipment | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +14.4% | 49.2% | 0.52 | −72.2% | +1,194% | 0.05 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 81 of 3,474 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.12 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.10 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.36 | — | ||
JXNJackson Financial Inc. · Life Insurance | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +41.7% | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | — | 0.22 | — | |
SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.58 | 0.13% | |
IGPTInvesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF · Technology | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +14.3% | 30.1% | 0.60 | −50.1% | +525% | 0.60 | 0.57% | |
What these numbers mean for HPE
- Annual return
- HPE returned 32.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $41,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- HPE's volatility over the past 5 years was 42.2%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, HPE's return lands within 42.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- HPE's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.89, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so HPE earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- HPE's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 56.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 56.9% fall takes a 132% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, HPE's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.56 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against HPE instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a HPE holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 29 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than HPE with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with HPE | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.12 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.26 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.10 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.22 | — | |
| 5 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.12 | — |
| 6 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.01 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.30 | — | |
| 8 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +1,050% | -0.05 | — |
| 9 | USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +803% | 0.24 | — |
| 10 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.19 | — |
| 11 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | -0.09 | — |
| 12 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | -0.03 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.18 | — | |
| 14 | ODCOil-Dri Corporation of America · Chemicals - Specialty | Whole market | +35.9% | 36.9% | 1.02 | −48.9% | +460% | 0.13 | — |
| 15 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.29 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.03 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.22 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.27 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.19 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | 0.05 | — | |
| 21 | JBLJabil Inc. · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +35.8% | 39.6% | 0.97 | −57.3% | +1,264% | 0.40 | — |
| 22 | SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP · Water Utilities | Whole market | +39.1% | 37.1% | 1.08 | −62.0% | +293% | 0.07 | — |
| 23 | NVTnVent Electric plc · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +35.4% | 38.0% | 0.99 | −56.2% | — | 0.53 | — |
| 24 | MLIMueller Industries, Inc. · Metal Fabrication | Whole market | +38.9% | 33.4% | 1.16 | −53.0% | +800% | 0.07 | — |
| 25 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.28 | — |
| 26 | IDCCInterDigital, Inc. · Intellectual Property Licensing | Whole market | +39.0% | 36.9% | 1.08 | −64.9% | +395% | 0.11 | — |
| 27 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | — | 0.18 | — |
| 28 | CAAPCorporacion America Airports S.A. · Infrastructure | Whole market | +35.1% | 35.9% | 1.02 | −89.9% | — | 0.16 | — |
| 29 | NRPNatural Resource Partners L.P. · Coal | Whole market | +37.4% | 33.9% | 1.11 | −78.8% | +632% | -0.02 | — |
HPE against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against HPE, compared period by period and year by year.
How do HPE's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at HPE, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 19 popular alternatives earned more than HPE over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, HPE returned 32.9% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (42.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than HPE with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings plc | +57.4% | 48.7% |
| SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | +55.8% | 89.4% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | +55.2% | 54.4% |
| WDC Western Digital Corporation | +53.8% | 53.5% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | +49.0% | 49.0% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | +35.7% | 57.6% |
| HPE This pageHewlett Packard Enterprise Company | +32.9% | 42.2% |
| IONQ IonQ, Inc. | +24.5% | 102% |
| NTAP NetApp, Inc. | +20.9% | 35.3% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.8% | 26.1% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | +16.6% | 30.5% |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | +13.5% | 49.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | +12.4% | 55.6% |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | +5.7% | 37.0% |
| HPQ HP Inc. | +5.7% | 37.3% |
| QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | +3.7% | 132% |
| RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc. | +3.1% | 131% |
Has HPE consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares HPE with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than HPE helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 19 popular alternatives, DELL, outperformed HPE in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- AVGO and ANET earned more for the risk they took than HPE (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- NVDA outperformed HPE over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so HPE has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than HPE over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (this page) | — | −9.1% | +26.3% | +103% | +135% | +150% | +296% | +315% | +483% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | — | $74B | — |
| DELL QualifiedDell Technologies Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −19.6% | +21.3% | +127% | +265% | +217% | +636% | +800% | +3,701% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | — | $294B | — |
| NVDA SemiconductorsNVIDIA Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| AMD SemiconductorsAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −13.1% | +6.2% | +94.5% | +139% | +122% | +425% | +359% | +7,583% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | — | $873B | — |
| STX Computer HardwareSeagate Technology Holdings plc | 1/5 short3/3 long | −23.0% | −15.8% | +25.3% | +136% | +217% | +975% | +866% | +2,698% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | — | $154B | — |
| WDC Computer HardwareWestern Digital Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −18.7% | −25.2% | −2.6% | +94.3% | +200% | +1,030% | +759% | +911% | 53.5% | 1.07 | −70.5% | — | $136B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| SMCI Computer HardwareSuper Micro Computer, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −21.2% | +36.3% | +12.7% | +4.9% | −41.0% | +30.6% | +817% | +1,383% | 89.4% | 0.94 | −84.8% | — | $21B | — |
| QUBT Computer HardwareQuantum Computing, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −27.5% | −17.9% | −33.9% | −41.0% | −62.4% | +656% | +20.1% | +5,317% | 132% | 0.63 | −99.9% | — | $1.5B | — |
| ANET Computer HardwareArista Networks, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −11.8% | +7.0% | +8.6% | +35.6% | +23.7% | +289% | +634% | +3,439% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | — | $229B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 2/5 short1/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| NTAP Computer HardwareNetApp, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +6.2% | +30.6% | +97.7% | +99.3% | +81.9% | +198% | +159% | +691% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | — | $41B | — |
| RGTI Computer HardwareRigetti Computing, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −29.5% | −18.2% | −40.6% | −50.6% | −73.1% | +872% | +16.4% | — | 131% | 0.65 | −96.9% | — | $3.9B | — |
| HPQ Computer HardwareHP Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.3% | +30.1% | +62.8% | +46.5% | +18.6% | +35.8% | +31.9% | +207% | 37.3% | 0.33 | −51.2% | — | $28B | — |
| LOGI Computer HardwareLogitech International S.A. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.6% | +9.1% | +11.0% | +10.7% | +0.8% | +65.4% | +32.1% | +489% | 37.0% | 0.34 | −67.8% | — | $16B | — |
| CSCO Communication EquipmentCisco Systems, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.9% | −3.2% | +22.6% | +42.2% | +53.8% | +118% | +118% | +374% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $421B | — |
| IBM Information Technology ServicesInternational Business Machines Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.3% | +14.4% | −3.3% | −15.3% | −12.5% | +93.5% | +116% | +151% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | — | $228B | — |
| NTNX Software - InfrastructureNutanix, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −2.6% | +23.8% | +68.0% | +34.8% | −0.1% | +90.0% | +88.3% | +139% | 49.2% | 0.50 | −80.4% | — | $18B | — |
| INTC SemiconductorsIntel Corp. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −24.7% | −5.5% | +39.6% | +133% | +141% | +167% | +79.8% | +219% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | — | $485B | — |
| IONQ Computer HardwareIonQ, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −22.8% | −8.7% | −35.3% | −33.2% | −47.8% | +148% | +199% | — | 102% | 0.71 | −90.0% | — | $13B | — |
How did HPE do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2016, along with where HPE ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with HPE and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: HPE began trading on October 19, 2015, so the table starts with 2016, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- Among its popular alternatives, NVDA came out ahead of HPE most often, in eight of the ten years both traded.
- HPE finished ahead of the S&P 500 in four of its ten full calendar years.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, HPE finished in the top quarter in two of ten years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 13 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of HPE; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places HPE among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of HPE | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPE This pageHewlett Packard Enterprise Company | — | +15.5% | +29.1% | +9.7% | +4.5% | +37.4% | −21.9% | +23.7% | −5.7% | +8.6% | +54.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 2 of 10 | 13 of 20 | 10 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 3 of 20 | 12 of 18 | 18 of 18 | 10 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 15 of 18 | 4 of 16 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 6 of 9 | +11.2% | +53.0% | +95.9% | −26.6% | +51.3% | +42.6% | +5.1% | +8.6% | +47.8% | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 8 of 10 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 7 of 10 | +77.3% | −18.1% | +128% | −55.0% | +56.9% | +100.0% | +148% | +79.6% | −9.3% | +295% |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings plc | 7 of 10 | +225% | +4.1% | +69.1% | −51.4% | +87.5% | +10.2% | +62.1% | −2.9% | +13.4% | +13.4% |
| WDC Western Digital Corporation | 5 of 10 | +284% | +13.9% | +66.0% | −51.6% | +17.7% | −10.9% | +77.1% | −51.9% | +19.8% | +17.5% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 8 of 10 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% |
| SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −4.0% | +7.2% | +246% | +87.0% | +38.5% | +32.1% | +73.9% | −34.0% | −25.6% | +14.7% |
| QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −38.0% | +1,712% | −39.5% | −55.7% | −75.8% | +370% | 0.0% | +275% | +300% | +25.0% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 6 of 10 | +18.6% | +87.7% | +94.1% | −15.6% | +97.9% | +42.9% | −3.5% | −10.5% | +143% | +24.2% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 6 of 10 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% |
| NTAP NetApp, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −5.9% | +34.2% | +51.1% | −32.9% | +42.5% | +10.9% | +7.4% | +9.7% | +59.9% | +36.6% |
| RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc. | 3 of 4 | +45.1% | +1,449% | +35.1% | −92.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HPQ HP Inc. | 5 of 10 | −28.7% | +12.2% | +16.1% | −26.4% | +57.2% | +24.3% | +3.9% | −0.2% | +43.5% | +31.2% |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | 6 of 10 | +23.4% | −12.0% | +55.2% | −22.9% | −14.3% | +109% | +53.5% | −5.7% | +38.1% | +68.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 5 of 10 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% | +13.8% | +16.6% | +31.3% | +15.1% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 5 of 10 | +38.2% | +39.3% | +21.9% | +10.6% | +16.6% | −1.2% | +23.6% | −22.6% | −4.9% | +25.2% |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −15.5% | +28.3% | +83.1% | −18.2% | 0.0% | +1.9% | −24.8% | +17.9% | +32.8% | — |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 6 of 10 | +84.0% | −59.6% | +94.5% | −46.6% | +6.0% | −14.7% | +30.7% | +4.2% | +30.9% | +8.7% |
| IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 2 of 4 | +7.4% | +237% | +259% | −79.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How HPE has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were HPE's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents HPE's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2015, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: HPE began trading on October 19, 2015, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of HPE's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: HPE fell 26.4% from June to July 2026, while the S&P 500 slipped only 1.7%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 22 months, after HPE fell 56.9% from March 2018 to March 2020.
Green means HPE fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | HPE fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Late-2018 sell-off | −56.9% | −14.7% | Mar 2018 | Mar 2020 | 2 years | Jan 2022 | 22 months |
| No named crash | −48.3% | −17.9% | Jan 2025 | Apr 2025 | 3 months | Sep 2025 | 5 months |
| 2022 bear market | −30.5% | −22.0% | Mar 2022 | Sep 2022 | 6 months | Jun 2023 | 9 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −28.8% | −10.0% | Oct 2015 | Jan 2016 | 3 months | Mar 2016 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −26.4% | −1.7% | Jun 2026 | Jul 2026 | 1 month | Aug 2026 | 1 month |
How did HPE do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far HPE, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: HPE began trading on October 19, 2015, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or three other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- HPE fell further than the S&P 500 in all five crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when HPE fell 45.3% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, STX held up best, falling less than HPE in four of the five crashes they both traded through.
- HPE began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but 13 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was IBM's 44.3%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than HPE.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPE This pageHewlett Packard Enterprise Company | — | −7.2% | −30.5% | −45.3% | −27.4% | −9.6% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 5 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 2 of 5 | −5.7% | −43.6% | −45.9% | −28.6% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 3 of 5 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −3.9% | −60.1% | −34.3% | −48.9% | −9.9% | −40.0% | −41.5% | 0.0% | −87.6% | −93.3% |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings plc | 4 of 5 | −5.2% | −54.0% | −25.6% | −25.4% | −8.4% | −48.9% | −34.8% | −0.5% | −88.7% | — |
| WDC Western Digital Corporation | 1 of 5 | −6.8% | −52.4% | −58.0% | −41.8% | −6.0% | −53.0% | −35.4% | −1.1% | −75.2% | −76.5% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 3 of 5 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −12.8% | −31.2% | −42.6% | −45.6% | −9.7% | −32.4% | −22.7% | 0.0% | −64.3% | — |
| QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 0 of 5 | −14.0% | −57.1% | −72.4% | −78.2% | −40.4% | −83.3% | −51.9% | −15.2% | −75.0% | — |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 3 of 5 | −1.5% | −36.6% | −31.2% | −31.2% | −6.1% | −36.6% | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 4 of 5 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| NTAP NetApp, Inc. | 3 of 5 | −5.4% | −34.3% | −34.2% | −36.6% | −7.3% | −38.4% | −34.2% | −4.7% | −67.6% | −96.2% |
| RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −18.1% | −83.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HPQ HP Inc. | 3 of 5 | −3.3% | −37.9% | −43.3% | −26.1% | −11.3% | −37.8% | −40.4% | −3.2% | −51.7% | −82.9% |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | 3 of 5 | −0.8% | −48.3% | −21.3% | −35.9% | −8.3% | −14.3% | −33.7% | −3.0% | −79.4% | −59.0% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 4 of 5 | −2.0% | −16.7% | −37.3% | −29.1% | −6.3% | −23.3% | −14.6% | −1.5% | −44.3% | −58.3% |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −7.0% | −55.9% | −66.6% | −22.6% | −4.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 4 of 5 | −1.0% | −54.1% | −33.5% | −13.0% | −6.7% | −19.7% | −16.2% | −0.9% | −55.2% | −82.3% |
| IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −9.9% | −74.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does HPE move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares HPE with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, HPE captured 116% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 102% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.31. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- DELL took just 43% of the S&P 500's losses, against 102% for HPE, while still keeping 154% of its gains.
- Eight of the 17 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than HPE's 1.14, led by DELL, STX and ANET.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than HPE's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPE This pageHewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 116% | 102% | 1.14 | 1.31 |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 154% | 43% | 3.59 | 1.13 |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings plc | 169% | 88% | 1.93 | 1.58 |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 174% | 91% | 1.92 | 1.40 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 254% | 179% | 1.42 | 2.25 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 257% | 207% | 1.24 | 3.79 |
| SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 189% | 168% | 1.12 | 1.74 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 101% | 96% | 1.06 | 0.97 |
| WDC Western Digital Corporation | 171% | 163% | 1.05 | 1.87 |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | 112% | 106% | 1.05 | 1.01 |
| NTAP NetApp, Inc. | 147% | 147% | 1.00 | 1.38 |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 98% | 100% | 0.98 | 1.43 |
| HPQ HP Inc. | 106% | 137% | 0.77 | 1.11 |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 68% | 91% | 0.75 | 1.20 |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 89% | 121% | 0.73 | 0.95 |
What diversifies HPE?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with HPE's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing HPE with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in HPE into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+38.7% for HPE alone, +40.1% for the mix).
- FIX made money in two of the two calendar years in which HPE lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of HPE over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.28 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which HPE lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% HPE and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (this page) | 1.00 | +315% | 0.89 | −21.9% | −5.7% | 39.1% | +38.7% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.15 | +119% | 1.48 | −9.0% | −5.2% | 31.6% | +35.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.28 | +225% | 1.34 | +3.9% | −19.8% | 32.1% | +37.6% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.13 | +101% | 1.04 | −13.4% | −8.7% | 31.8% | +35.1% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.19 | +83.3% | 1.00 | −6.5% | −3.0% | 31.9% | +34.3% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.47 | +62.9% | 0.99 | +2.6% | −4.8% | 32.1% | +33.8% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.38 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +2.1% | −9.5% | 32.2% | +34.5% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.19 | +126% | 0.96 | +24.8% | −1.9% | 30.8% | +36.3% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.14 | +177% | 0.93 | −32.7% | −18.2% | 32.4% | +37.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (this page) | 1.00 | +315% | 0.89 | −21.9% | −5.7% | 39.1% | +38.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.01 | +479% | 1.55 | +10.1% | −24.5% | 31.8% | +40.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.31 | +3,143% | 1.47 | −2.4% | −16.3% | 36.6% | +54.2% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.17 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +6.7% | +0.8% | 34.0% | +50.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.10 | +413% | 1.44 | +27.1% | −28.4% | 31.2% | +40.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.26 | +690% | 1.41 | −27.4% | −8.2% | 33.6% | +42.4% |
Common questions
What was HPE's worst drawdown?
HPE's deepest decline since it began trading in 2015 was 56.9%, from March 2018 to March 2020. It took 22 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because HPE launched in October 2015, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were HPE's best and worst years?
Over ten full calendar years, HPE's best year was 2016, when it returned 54.2%. Its worst was 2020, with a return of -21.9%.
Is there a better investment than HPE?
Among HPE's popular alternatives, AVGO earned more for the risk it took than HPE over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 48.3%, against 56.9% for HPE. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ASX (semiconductors) earned more than HPE over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 48.8% a year at 43.0% volatility, against 32.9% a year at 42.2%.
Is HPE more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. HPE's volatility over the past 5 years was 42.2%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, HPE's return lands within 42.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is HPE's Sharpe ratio?
HPE's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.89, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so HPE earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is HPE with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, HPE's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.56 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against HPE instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a HPE holding.
What are the best alternatives to HPE?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed HPE in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: DELL.
Did HPE outperform the S&P 500?
HPE finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of ten full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +15.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did HPE do in stock market crashes?
HPE fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the five major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when HPE fell 45.3% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies HPE?
These had a low correlation with HPE over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.15), DXJ (correlation 0.28) and EMLP (correlation 0.13); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.01), CLS (correlation 0.31) and FIX (correlation 0.17). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than HPE's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of HPE's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.