Relative Intelligence · Metals & Mining

How Southern Copper (SCCO) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SCCO alone. It places SCCO (Southern Copper Corporation) against 12 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SCCO stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: SCCO's full trading record, from January 1996 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowSCCO has outpaced the market, rising 17.6% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its metals & mining peers were far apart over the past 3 months, from ERO (Ero Copper, up 31.1%) to RIO (Rio Tinto Group, up 1.1%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?More than an industry move: SCCO rose 17.6% over the past 3 months, against 7.2% for the metals & mining ETF COPX (Global X - Copper Miners ETF). The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its metals & mining peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: ERO (Ero Copper) rose 31.1%, while RIO (Rio Tinto Group) rose 1.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, SCCO rose 56.5% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (233% against 89.3%). On the flip side, SCCO led its metals & mining peers in 2023, then fell behind FCX (Freeport-McMoRan) and TGB (Trekor Metals) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termSCCO turned $10,000 into $112,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. SCCO's 10-year return of 1,017% puts it ahead of 95% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, SCCO has typically fallen 1.5 times as far as the S&P 500. The 2022 bear market took 43.0% off SCCO, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than BHP (BHP Group, 31.8%) but less than FCX (Freeport-McMoRan, 51.3%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 10 years, SCCO's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.13: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.4 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.0 times as much. SCCO is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.43 with the total US market, more closely than 58% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- ESLT (Elbit Systems, aerospace & defense) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace, aerospace & defense) earned more than SCCO with less volatility over the past 5 years. ESLT returned 39.8% a year at 34.6% volatility, against 32.0% a year at 40.7%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 37 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SCCO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY (Eli Lilly and Company), HSBC and GE (GE Aerospace).
How much would $10,000 in SCCO have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SCCO over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SCCO over the same span and SCCO's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in SCCO at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $2,677,967 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SCCO, and MNST finished highest, at $45,663,831.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 7 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SCCO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$46M+456,538% total · +33.7% a year
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- TPL$4M+44,797% total · +23.4% a year
- APH$3M+29,926% total · +21.7% a year
- SCCO$3M+26,680% total · +21.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- FCX$86,132+761% total · +7.7% a year
- NEM$39,676+297% total · +4.9% a year
- TGB$17,820+78.2% total · +2.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 144 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SCCO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ATI$113,890+1,039% total · +62.7% a year
- HWM$73,554+636% total · +49.0% a year
- MOG-A$52,115+421% total · +39.1% a year
- GE$49,841+398% total · +37.9% a year
- ESLT$49,131+391% total · +37.5% a year
- TGB$47,141+371% total · +36.4% a year
- SCCO$47,048+370% total · +36.3% a year
- HBM$43,240+332% total · +34.0% a year
- ERO$20,671+107% total · +15.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
SCCO at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- SCCO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1996 was 78.5%, from October 2007 to November 2008. It took 23 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, SCCO's best was 2003, when it returned 236%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 50.2%. It lost money in 11 of those years.
- SCCO is 7.9% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $171B
- Industry
- Copper
- Price history from
- January 1996
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +56.5%total return
- Past 3 years
- +233%+49.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +301%+32.0% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,017%+27.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +236%2003
- Worst calendar year
- −50.2%2008
- Losing years
- 11 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 40.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.89return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −78.5%Oct 2007 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −7.9%below the peak
SCCO against the whole market
Where SCCO ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does SCCO rank among all stocks?
This section ranks SCCO on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how SCCO stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- SCCO's 10-year return ranks in the top 5% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | SCCO | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +56.5% | 464 of 3,287 | top 14% |
| 3-year return | +233% | 330 of 3,017 | top 11% |
| 5-year return | +301% | 169 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| 10-year return | +1,017% | 105 of 2,202 | top 5% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 40.7% | 1,491 of 2,893 | bottom 49% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.89 | 180 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −55.3% | 690 of 2,187 | top 32% |
What has beaten SCCO on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). SCCO sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than SCCO with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 36 stocks and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SCCO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half SCCO's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 39% less than SCCO's 40.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.89 for SCCO. PBR-A earned the most, 51.8% a year, while still swinging less than SCCO (37.5% against 40.7%).
- None of SCCO's popular alternatives made it, but HWM (aerospace & defense) did: 47.3% a year at 32.5% volatility, 20% less than SCCO's 40.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to SCCO; faint dots are 28 more of the 37 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than SCCO?
Investments that beat SCCO over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ESLT (aerospace & defense) and HWM (aerospace & defense) earned more than SCCO with less volatility over the past 5 years. ESLT returned 39.8% a year at 34.6% volatility, against 32.0% a year at 40.7%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 37 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SCCO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, HSBC and GE.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat SCCO over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks SCCO's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than SCCO follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than SCCO's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× SCCO's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than SCCO's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with SCCO?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.43 | 0.09% | |||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Metals & Mining and the categories next to it (Gold Mining, Aerospace & Defense, Silver, Gold), plus SCCO's specific themes. 6 of 83 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.40 | — | |
ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.03 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.28 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.45 | — | ||
MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, lower volatility | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.31 | — | |
CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.35 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 75 of 3,539 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.04 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.30 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.10 | — | ||
DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +1,050% | 0.27 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.40 | 0.35% | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +2,534% | 0.24 | — | ||
FTXLFirst Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Higher return in most periods | +27.4% | 38.8% | 0.82 | −43.9% | +1,077% | 0.40 | 0.60% | |
What these numbers mean for SCCO
- Annual return
- SCCO returned 32.0% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $40,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- SCCO's volatility over the past 5 years was 40.7%, 2.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SCCO's return lands within 40.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- SCCO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.89, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SCCO earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- SCCO's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 55.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 55.3% fall takes a 124% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, SCCO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SCCO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SCCO holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 37 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than SCCO with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with SCCO | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.04 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.30 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.10 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.33 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.29 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.07 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.28 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.37 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.30 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.28 | — | |
| 11 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | 0.03 | — |
| 12 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.21 | — |
| 13 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.15 | — | |
| 14 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Same or nearby category | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.03 | — |
| 15 | USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +803% | 0.13 | — |
| 16 | ODCOil-Dri Corporation of America · Chemicals - Specialty | Whole market | +35.9% | 36.9% | 1.02 | −48.9% | +460% | 0.18 | — |
| 17 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.51 | — | |
| 18 | Same or nearby category | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.28 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.31 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | 0.12 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.39 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.23 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.26 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | 0.19 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | 0.33 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.40 | 0.35% | |
| 27 | SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP · Water Utilities | Whole market | +39.1% | 37.1% | 1.08 | −62.0% | +293% | 0.20 | — |
| 28 | Same or nearby category | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.45 | — | |
| 29 | NVTnVent Electric plc · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +35.4% | 38.0% | 0.99 | −56.2% | — | 0.37 | — |
| 30 | MLIMueller Industries, Inc. · Metal Fabrication | Whole market | +38.9% | 33.4% | 1.16 | −53.0% | +800% | 0.21 | — |
| 31 | IDCCInterDigital, Inc. · Intellectual Property Licensing | Whole market | +39.0% | 36.9% | 1.08 | −64.9% | +395% | 0.23 | — |
| 32 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | — | 0.14 | — |
| 33 | AROCArchrock, Inc. · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +33.1% | 36.4% | 0.97 | −84.9% | +288% | 0.30 | — |
| 34 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Same or nearby category | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.31 | — |
| 35 | CAAPCorporacion America Airports S.A. · Infrastructure | Whole market | +35.1% | 35.9% | 1.02 | −89.9% | — | 0.38 | — |
| 36 | EZPWEZCORP, Inc. · Financial - Credit Services | Whole market | +33.2% | 35.4% | 0.99 | −76.6% | +202% | 0.16 | — |
| 37 | NRPNatural Resource Partners L.P. · Coal | Whole market | +37.4% | 33.9% | 1.11 | −78.8% | +632% | 0.23 | — |
SCCO against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against SCCO, compared period by period and year by year.
How do SCCO's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at SCCO, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 11 popular alternatives earned more than SCCO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Six of the 11 popular alternatives earned less than SCCO over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, SCCO returned 32.0% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (40.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than SCCO with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SCCO This pageSouthern Copper Corporation | +32.0% | 40.7% |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | +28.4% | 63.5% |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | +26.3% | 55.8% |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | +19.2% | 45.3% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | +18.6% | 39.1% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | +16.6% | 31.4% |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | +13.7% | 44.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| RIO Rio Tinto Group | +12.2% | 29.0% |
| PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | +10.4% | 28.1% |
| ERO Ero Copper Corp. | +9.8% | 56.0% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | +7.4% | 35.0% |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | −3.9% | 55.1% |
Has SCCO consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares SCCO with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than SCCO helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 12 popular alternatives outperformed SCCO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was TGB.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than SCCO over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation (this page) | — | +2.2% | +17.6% | +9.6% | +39.9% | +56.5% | +233% | +301% | +1,017% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | — | $171B | — |
| TGB CopperTrekor Metals Limited | 2/5 short2/3 long | −8.3% | +13.2% | +3.1% | +42.0% | +100% | +616% | +249% | +1,667% | 63.5% | 0.71 | −90.8% | — | $2.9B | — |
| HBM CopperHudbay Minerals Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −11.2% | +13.6% | −7.8% | +17.9% | +44.2% | +445% | +221% | +493% | 55.8% | 0.70 | −86.3% | — | $11B | — |
| ERO CopperEro Copper Corp. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.2% | +31.1% | +15.9% | +13.3% | +45.0% | +138% | +59.8% | — | 56.0% | 0.45 | −67.2% | — | $3.4B | — |
| FCX CopperFreeport-McMoRan Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −4.3% | +17.4% | −1.4% | +33.9% | +64.8% | +111% | +89.6% | +650% | 44.9% | 0.51 | −72.6% | — | $99B | — |
| NEM GoldNewmont Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.1% | +31.2% | +2.2% | +16.1% | +24.3% | +219% | +135% | +304% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | — | $123B | — |
| TECK CopperTeck Resources Limited | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.6% | +18.2% | +9.1% | +34.5% | +46.2% | +68.6% | +141% | +259% | 45.3% | 0.61 | −79.6% | — | $31B | — |
| RIO Industrial MaterialsRio Tinto Group | 0/5 short0/3 long | −9.2% | +1.1% | −9.7% | +10.6% | +30.1% | +69.2% | +77.9% | +464% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | — | $143B | — |
| BHP Industrial MaterialsBHP Group Limited | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.9% | +3.9% | +5.1% | +38.1% | +50.2% | +71.0% | +115% | +398% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | — | $208B | — |
| VALE Industrial MaterialsVale S.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.0% | −5.5% | −24.9% | +1.0% | +23.6% | +37.8% | +42.6% | +334% | 35.0% | 0.38 | −57.6% | — | $55B | — |
| PICK InternationaliShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −6.3% | +3.4% | −8.0% | +11.4% | +27.9% | +73.1% | +63.9% | +267% | 28.1% | 0.49 | −52.7% | 0.39% | $2.4B | — |
| AA AluminumAlcoa Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.6% | −6.0% | −38.5% | −27.5% | +5.5% | +75.8% | −18.2% | +115% | 55.1% | 0.20 | −90.9% | — | $11B | — |
| IE CopperIvanhoe Electric Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −14.2% | +4.6% | −45.1% | −48.3% | −49.6% | −22.0% | — | — | — | — | −71.1% | — | $1.3B | — |
How did SCCO do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where SCCO ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with SCCO and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- None of the 11 popular alternatives came out ahead of SCCO in most of the years they have in common.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SCCO finished in the top quarter in 14 of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 6 of 13.
- SCCO finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of SCCO; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places SCCO among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of SCCO | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCO This pageSouthern Copper Corporation | — | +66.7% | +10.7% | +50.3% | +4.5% | −0.4% | +59.0% | +44.6% | −33.0% | +50.3% | +23.1% | −6.2% | −0.3% | −22.5% | +41.2% | −33.4% | +56.3% | +109% | −50.2% | +111% | +79.5% | +60.3% | +7.2% | +236% | +23.5% | −4.2% | −14.2% | +65.5% | −26.5% | −1.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 14 of 29 | 6 of 13 | 4 of 13 | 1 of 13 | 5 of 12 | 10 of 12 | 4 of 12 | 2 of 12 | 8 of 12 | 5 of 11 | 11 of 11 | 2 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 7 of 11 | 1 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 5 of 10 | 2 of 9 | 4 of 7 | 6 of 7 | 1 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 2 of 7 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | 10 of 29 | +192% | +38.6% | −4.8% | −28.3% | +55.3% | +175% | +1.5% | −79.7% | +173% | +151% | −67.0% | −51.4% | −29.3% | +9.9% | −48.0% | +24.4% | +640% | −89.0% | +100% | +112% | −29.1% | +3.0% | +519% | −6.9% | −59.7% | −49.0% | −47.6% | −4.3% | −50.1% |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 11 of 22 | +145% | +47.2% | +9.1% | −29.9% | +3.9% | +69.4% | −11.5% | −46.3% | +54.9% | +49.3% | −55.8% | +6.2% | −17.8% | +3.3% | −44.7% | +41.9% | +407% | −87.0% | +4.7% | +272% | +179% | −67.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ERO Ero Copper Corp. | 3 of 8 | +110% | −14.6% | +14.8% | −10.1% | −5.7% | −11.0% | +152% | +21.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 8 of 29 | +35.4% | −9.4% | +13.7% | −7.3% | +61.4% | +99.1% | +29.6% | −45.1% | +43.8% | +94.9% | −70.2% | −35.8% | +19.9% | −4.0% | −36.9% | +52.7% | +228% | −75.5% | +86.9% | +11.6% | +49.1% | −6.6% | +154% | +25.5% | +56.5% | −59.5% | +102% | −32.9% | −45.6% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 9 of 29 | +173% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −20.8% | +7.4% | +40.3% | +30.5% | −6.2% | +10.9% | +90.1% | −4.4% | −17.2% | −48.5% | −20.4% | −0.6% | +31.0% | +17.3% | −15.9% | +9.1% | −14.8% | +21.4% | −8.1% | +68.2% | +52.6% | +12.7% | −29.9% | +35.0% | −37.7% | −34.1% |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | 8 of 23 | +19.2% | −2.6% | +14.0% | +33.8% | +59.8% | +5.8% | −18.7% | −16.9% | +33.4% | +421% | −71.1% | −44.9% | −25.8% | +5.9% | −42.1% | +78.7% | +611% | −86.1% | −2.8% | +47.1% | +81.7% | +87.5% | +148% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RIO Rio Tinto Group | 10 of 29 | +44.5% | −15.4% | +11.1% | +18.4% | −0.4% | +36.2% | +37.5% | −2.9% | +44.9% | +39.2% | −33.4% | −15.3% | +0.6% | +22.4% | −30.5% | +35.3% | +195% | −78.5% | +102% | +23.6% | +57.1% | +9.7% | +45.6% | +5.1% | +12.6% | −20.9% | +115% | −8.9% | −16.4% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 12 of 29 | +28.9% | −24.6% | +16.4% | +29.4% | +2.0% | +25.3% | +24.6% | +10.5% | +33.8% | +41.9% | −38.1% | −27.9% | −9.8% | +14.9% | −22.0% | +24.5% | +85.2% | −37.4% | +79.4% | +21.2% | +42.0% | +34.3% | +62.6% | +50.4% | +8.7% | −16.6% | +91.5% | −18.9% | −32.0% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 7 of 23 | +66.3% | −38.8% | +1.6% | +32.5% | −1.7% | +32.0% | +2.7% | +12.3% | +62.2% | +134% | −57.8% | −44.1% | −23.2% | +3.3% | −34.0% | +21.2% | +145% | −61.8% | +123% | +47.5% | +46.9% | +50.6% | +108% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 4 of 13 | +51.9% | −16.4% | +9.7% | +2.6% | +22.6% | +27.5% | +16.5% | −18.6% | +38.5% | +54.7% | −40.5% | −19.7% | −8.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | 10 of 29 | +42.5% | +12.5% | −24.3% | −23.1% | +159% | +7.1% | −19.1% | −50.7% | +91.8% | +28.3% | −36.8% | +49.9% | +24.3% | +1.7% | −43.3% | −3.6% | +47.7% | −68.2% | +24.3% | +4.2% | −3.7% | −15.7% | +71.3% | −34.5% | +8.0% | −17.9% | +126% | +7.7% | +11.9% |
| IE Ivanhoe Electric Inc. | 1 of 3 | +112% | −25.1% | −17.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How SCCO has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were SCCO's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents SCCO's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1996, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of SCCO's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: SCCO fell 57.0% from June 1997 to January 1999, while the S&P 500 rose 44.9%.
- The slowest recovery came after SCCO fell 57.0% from June 1997 to January 1999; it did not regain that peak until August 2003, five years later.
Green means SCCO fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | SCCO fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −78.5% | −50.0% | Oct 2007 | Nov 2008 | 13 months | Oct 2010 | 23 months |
| No named crash | −57.0% | +44.9% | Jun 1997 | Jan 1999 | 19 months | Aug 2003 | 4.6 years |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −55.3% | −14.2% | Apr 2018 | Mar 2020 | 23 months | Oct 2020 | 7 months |
| 2011 euro debt crisis | −49.1% | −10.3% | Jan 2011 | Oct 2011 | 9 months | Jan 2013 | 15 months |
| No named crash | −46.0% | −2.6% | Jan 2004 | May 2004 | 4 months | Sep 2004 | 4 months |
How did SCCO do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far SCCO, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, BHP held up best, falling less than SCCO in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- SCCO fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when SCCO fell 78.5% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than SCCO.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCO This pageSouthern Copper Corporation | — | −3.4% | −43.0% | −38.7% | −32.0% | −5.3% | −26.0% | −32.9% | −0.4% | −78.5% | −42.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | 0 of 10 | −6.3% | −61.9% | −50.2% | −44.2% | −5.4% | −55.6% | −48.6% | −1.2% | −91.2% | −82.1% |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 1 of 9 | −9.2% | −63.3% | −57.9% | −30.1% | −10.0% | −74.5% | −38.9% | 0.0% | −91.9% | — |
| ERO Ero Copper Corp. | 1 of 5 | −6.2% | −49.1% | −53.9% | −29.2% | −6.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 0 of 10 | −7.2% | −51.3% | −56.1% | −32.8% | −8.4% | −72.2% | −46.7% | −2.1% | −86.4% | −51.4% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 6 of 10 | −1.0% | −51.8% | −24.5% | −9.5% | −6.0% | −20.2% | −12.0% | −2.3% | −61.5% | −53.0% |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | 1 of 9 | −8.2% | −43.6% | −54.0% | −26.9% | −8.1% | −65.4% | −48.9% | 0.0% | −94.8% | — |
| RIO Rio Tinto Group | 5 of 10 | −2.6% | −35.3% | −30.0% | −13.2% | −5.3% | −43.9% | −41.3% | 0.0% | −89.0% | −33.9% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 7 of 10 | −2.2% | −31.8% | −38.1% | −12.8% | −6.4% | −49.4% | −30.7% | 0.0% | −73.7% | −32.6% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 2 of 9 | −3.1% | −41.4% | −45.5% | −20.9% | −5.3% | −61.1% | −33.4% | −0.8% | −79.5% | — |
| PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2 of 6 | −4.0% | −36.4% | −41.4% | −18.0% | −6.2% | −41.8% | — | — | — | — |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | 0 of 10 | −12.4% | −64.5% | −67.2% | −42.6% | −7.1% | −38.6% | −43.6% | 0.0% | −87.8% | −59.3% |
| IE Ivanhoe Electric Inc. | 0 of 1 | −15.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does SCCO move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares SCCO with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, SCCO captured 139% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 103% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.13. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Only NEM had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SCCO's 1.35, out of ten popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than SCCO's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCO This pageSouthern Copper Corporation | 139% | 103% | 1.35 | 1.13 |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 68% | 45% | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| RIO Rio Tinto Group | 98% | 72% | 1.35 | 0.63 |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 100% | 88% | 1.13 | 0.74 |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 106% | 97% | 1.10 | 0.87 |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | 217% | 214% | 1.01 | 1.89 |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 164% | 181% | 0.90 | 1.74 |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | 115% | 128% | 0.90 | 1.10 |
| PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 115% | 133% | 0.86 | 1.12 |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 193% | 234% | 0.82 | 1.95 |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | 187% | 303% | 0.62 | 2.17 |
What diversifies SCCO?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with SCCO's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing SCCO with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in SCCO into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+36.3% for SCCO alone, +38.0% for the mix).
- MCK made money in eight of the 11 calendar years in which SCCO lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and HDV have moved largely independently of SCCO over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which SCCO lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% SCCO and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2021 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2011 | 2008 | 2001 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +301% | 0.89 | −0.4% | −33.0% | −6.2% | −0.3% | −22.5% | −33.4% | −50.2% | −4.2% | −14.2% | −26.5% | −1.5% | 40.9% | +36.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.43 | +225% | 1.34 | +18.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | +41.3% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 33.9% | +35.7% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.40 | +101% | 1.04 | +23.1% | −8.7% | −25.3% | +23.8% | +16.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34.0% | +33.2% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.49 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +19.6% | −3.0% | −0.3% | +12.6% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34.2% | +32.3% |
| PWV Broad MarketInvesco Large Cap Value ETF | 0.45 | +88.7% | 0.97 | +29.1% | −14.1% | −4.8% | +12.3% | +32.6% | +6.5% | −27.3% | — | — | — | — | 34.1% | +32.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.40 | +323% | 0.97 | +42.1% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +33.4% | +6.8% | −44.7% | −14.6% | — | — | — | 36.1% | +38.2% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.22 | +136% | 0.93 | +22.7% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.8% | +34.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.36 | +177% | 0.93 | +53.3% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +26.3% | +2.8% | −39.0% | −18.2% | +24.4% | — | — | 34.9% | +35.0% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.19 | +111% | 0.89 | +39.1% | −12.6% | −25.7% | +4.8% | +18.6% | +10.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 33.6% | +34.1% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2021 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2011 | 2008 | 2001 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +301% | 0.89 | −0.4% | −33.0% | −6.2% | −0.3% | −22.5% | −33.4% | −50.2% | −4.2% | −14.2% | −26.5% | −1.5% | 40.9% | +36.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.10 | +479% | 1.55 | −0.4% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +66.0% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −2.5% | +108% | +51.7% | +29.1% | 33.6% | +38.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.11 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +37.9% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +12.9% | +27.6% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.6% | −2.3% | — | — | 36.0% | +53.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.16 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +89.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −10.4% | +61.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +73.7% | −71.1% | −9.5% | — | 35.3% | +48.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.07 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.2% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +67.7% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +4.9% | +61.2% | +46.9% | +96.3% | 33.4% | +38.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.30 | +690% | 1.41 | +61.0% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +0.4% | +48.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 35.2% | +40.6% |
Common questions
What was SCCO's worst drawdown?
SCCO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1996 was 78.5%, from October 2007 to November 2008. It took 23 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were SCCO's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, SCCO's best year was 2003, when it returned 236%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -50.2%.
Is there a better investment than SCCO?
Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ESLT (aerospace & defense) and HWM (aerospace & defense) earned more than SCCO with less volatility over the past 5 years. ESLT returned 39.8% a year at 34.6% volatility, against 32.0% a year at 40.7%. Few investments have done better on both counts: only 37 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SCCO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, HSBC and GE.
Is SCCO more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. SCCO's volatility over the past 5 years was 40.7%, 2.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SCCO's return lands within 40.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is SCCO's Sharpe ratio?
SCCO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.89, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SCCO earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is SCCO with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, SCCO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SCCO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SCCO holding.
What are the best alternatives to SCCO?
None of the 12 popular alternatives we compared outperformed SCCO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about SCCO's strength than about its alternatives.
Did SCCO outperform the S&P 500?
SCCO finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +66.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did SCCO do in stock market crashes?
SCCO fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when SCCO fell 78.5% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies SCCO?
These had a low correlation with SCCO over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.43), EMLP (correlation 0.40) and HDV (correlation 0.49); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.10), CLS (correlation 0.11) and FIX (correlation 0.16). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than SCCO's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of SCCO's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.