Relative Intelligence · Metals & Mining

How Rio Tinto Group (RIO) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on RIO alone. It places RIO (Rio Tinto Group) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where RIO stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: RIO's full trading record, from June 1990 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, RIO fell 9.7% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. Its metals & mining peers split over the past 6 months: SCCO (Southern Copper) rose 9.6%, while MP (MP Materials) fell 41.0%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?RIO rose 1.1% over the past 3 months, 2.2 points behind the metals & mining ETF PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF), which rose 3.4%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its metals & mining peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SCCO (Southern Copper) rose 17.6%, while MP (MP Materials) fell 14.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsRIO has outpaced the market, rising 30.1% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termRIO turned $10,000 into $56,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, over 5 years RIO trailed the index: 77.9% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, RIO has typically fallen 1.6 times as far as the S&P 500. Even so, in the 2022 bear market, RIO held up better than SCCO (Southern Copper), FCX and VALE; only BHP (BHP Group) fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, RIO has a correlation of 0.34 over 5 years, less closely than 62% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, RIO's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.63: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.0 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 72% as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- CAT (Caterpillar) and BHP (BHP Group) earned more than RIO over the past 5 years with similar volatility: CAT returned 31.1% a year at 31.9% volatility, against 12.2% a year at 29.0%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- GLD (SPDR Gold Shares, gold) and RTX (aerospace & defense) earned more than RIO with less volatility over the past 5 years. GLD returned 17.7% a year at 18.9% volatility, against 12.2% a year at 29.0%.
- Whole market
- 227 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than RIO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway), BRK-A (Berkshire Hathaway) and WMT (Walmart).
How much would $10,000 in RIO have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in RIO over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of RIO over the same span and RIO's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in RIO at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $271,382 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of RIO, and SCCO finished highest, at $2,677,967.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 231 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of RIO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SCCO$3M+26,680% total · +21.3% a year
- CAT$615,591+6,056% total · +15.3% a year
- STLD$598,980+5,890% total · +15.2% a year
- BHP$430,670+4,207% total · +13.9% a year
- NUE$361,333+3,513% total · +13.2% a year
- RIO$271,382+2,614% total · +12.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- FCX$86,132+761% total · +7.7% a year
- NEM$39,676+297% total · +4.9% a year
- TGB$17,820+78.2% total · +2.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 853 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of RIO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- TGB$47,141+371% total · +36.4% a year
- SCCO$47,048+370% total · +36.3% a year
- CAT$46,130+361% total · +35.8% a year
- HBM$43,240+332% total · +34.0% a year
- STLD$40,782+308% total · +32.5% a year
- NUE$25,527+155% total · +20.6% a year
- NEM$24,375+144% total · +19.5% a year
- FCX$23,053+131% total · +18.2% a year
- RIO$19,377+93.8% total · +14.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
RIO at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- RIO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1990 was 89.0%, from May to December 2008. It took about 12 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, RIO's best was 2009, when it returned 195%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 78.5%. It lost money in ten of those years.
- RIO is 19.6% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $143B
- Industry
- Industrial Materials
- Price history from
- June 1990
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +30.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +69.2%+19.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +77.9%+12.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +464%+18.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +195%2009
- Worst calendar year
- −78.5%2008
- Losing years
- 10 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 29.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.54return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −89.0%May 2008 to Dec 2008
- From its all-time high
- −19.6%below the peak
RIO against the whole market
Where RIO ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does RIO rank among all stocks?
This section ranks RIO on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how RIO stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- RIO's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 4% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | RIO | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.1% | 973 of 3,287 | top 30% |
| 3-year return | +69.2% | 1,272 of 3,017 | top 42% |
| 5-year return | +77.9% | 835 of 2,893 | top 29% |
| 10-year return | +464% | 334 of 2,202 | top 15% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 29.0% | 639 of 2,893 | top 22% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.54 | 825 of 2,893 | top 29% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −37.5% | 94 of 2,187 | top 4% |
What has beaten RIO on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). RIO sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than RIO with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 109 stocks and 118 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than RIO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 6% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half RIO's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 15% less than RIO's 29.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.54 for RIO.
- None of RIO's popular alternatives made it, but IAUM (gold) did: 18.1% a year at 18.8% volatility, 35% less than RIO's 29.0%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to RIO; faint dots are 93 more of the 227 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than RIO?
Investments that beat RIO over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among RIO's popular alternatives, CAT and BHP earned more than RIO over the past 5 years with similar volatility: CAT returned 31.1% a year at 31.9% volatility, against 12.2% a year at 29.0%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, GLD (gold) and RTX (aerospace & defense) earned more than RIO with less volatility over the past 5 years. GLD returned 17.7% a year at 18.9% volatility, against 12.2% a year at 29.0%.
- Across the whole market, 227 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than RIO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them BRK-B, BRK-A and WMT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat RIO over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks RIO's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than RIO follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than RIO's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× RIO's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than RIO's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with RIO?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +12.2% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | +464% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.34 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against RIO. 9 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.75 | — | ||
STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Higher return in most periods | +32.2% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | +1,018% | 0.39 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +18.6% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | +304% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +21.7% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | +569% | 0.39 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.92 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Metals & Mining and the categories next to it (Gold Mining, Aerospace & Defense, Silver, Gold), plus RIO's specific themes. 21 of 79 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.57 | 0.40% | ||
RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.25 | — | |
ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.37 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.21 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | +12.9% | 20.8% | 0.69 | −51.6% | +184% | 0.27 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 640 of 3,535 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.09 | — | ||
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.52 | 0.40% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.18 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.42 | — | ||
DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.64 | 0.27% | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.15 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.08 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for RIO
- Annual return
- RIO returned 12.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $17,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- RIO's volatility over the past 5 years was 29.0%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, RIO's return lands within 29.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- RIO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.54, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so RIO earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- RIO's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 37.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 37.5% fall takes a 59.9% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, RIO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.34 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against RIO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a RIO holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 227 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than RIO with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with RIO | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.09 | — | |
| 2 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.52 | 0.40% |
| 3 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.18 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.42 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.28 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.21 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.01 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.26 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.18 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.10 | — | |
| 11 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.64 | 0.27% |
| 12 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.44 | 0.15% |
| 13 | OEFiShares S&P 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.8% | 0.84 | −31.4% | +367% | 0.29 | 0.20% |
| 14 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.42 | — | |
| 15 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.38 | 0.40% |
| 16 | HEFAiShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF · Developed International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 13.8% | 0.97 | −32.4% | +210% | 0.45 | 0.70% |
| 17 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.06 | — | |
| 18 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.15 | — |
| 19 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.41 | 0.50% |
| 20 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.23 | — | |
| 21 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.23 | 0.15% |
| 22 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.28 | 0.45% |
| 23 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 22.8% | 0.77 | −32.3% | +286% | 0.07 | — |
| 24 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.22 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.11 | — | |
| 26 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.25 | 0.45% |
| 27 | EFIVState Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.3% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −24.5% | — | 0.34 | 0.10% |
| 28 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.49 | — | |
| 29 | EWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.2% | 0.86 | −30.1% | — | 0.60 | 0.15% |
| 30 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.30 | 0.48% |
| 31 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.28 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.25 | 0.18% | |
| 33 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.26 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.23 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.27 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.02 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.38 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.22 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.49 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.22 | 0.09% | |
| 41 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.20 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.34 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.37 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.12 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.39 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.45 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.35 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.07 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.22 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.31 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.19 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.43 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.23 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.24 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.15 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.25 | — | |
| 57 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.17 | — |
| 58 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.40 | — | |
| 59 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.30 | 0.80% |
| 60 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.48 | — |
| 61 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.68 | 0.25% |
| 62 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.27 | — |
| 63 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.18 | — |
| 64 | PBAPembina Pipeline Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +13.8% | 21.5% | 0.71 | −70.9% | +172% | 0.51 | — |
| 65 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.44 | 0.56% |
| 66 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +13.3% | 23.8% | 0.65 | −49.7% | — | 0.09 | — |
| 67 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.67 | 0.36% |
| 68 | PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Whole market | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +294% | 0.34 | — |
| 69 | RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated · Insurance | Whole market | +19.7% | 27.3% | 0.80 | −65.8% | +199% | 0.10 | — |
| 70 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.49 | 0.59% |
| 71 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.42 | 0.39% |
| 72 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.05 | 0.58% |
| 73 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.8% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +340% | 0.24 | — |
| 74 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.47 | 0.43% |
| 75 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.33 | 0.12% |
| 76 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.47 | 0.15% |
| 77 | AIZAssurant, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −44.6% | +312% | 0.17 | — |
| 78 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.23 | — |
| 79 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.04 | — |
| 80 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.19 | — |
| 81 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.02 | — |
| 82 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.49 | 0.19% |
| 83 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.34 | 0.40% |
| 84 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.13 | 0.13% |
| 85 | GHCGraham Holdings Company · Industrial Conglomerates | Whole market | +17.4% | 26.3% | 0.74 | −62.5% | +191% | 0.19 | — |
| 86 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.35 | — |
| 87 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · International | Whole market | +17.3% | 22.8% | 0.82 | −40.5% | — | 0.62 | 0.49% |
| 88 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.17 | — |
| 89 | WTVWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.0% | 0.83 | −42.2% | +303% | 0.42 | 0.12% |
| 90 | Same or nearby category | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.57 | 0.40% | |
| 91 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.46 | 0.05% |
| 92 | PWVInvesco Large Cap Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.2% | 0.97 | −37.6% | +223% | 0.37 | 0.55% |
| 93 | SRCE1st Source Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.1% | 27.0% | 0.66 | −51.7% | +210% | 0.02 | — |
| 94 | BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | 0.02 | — |
| 95 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.6% | 0.85 | −41.3% | — | 0.36 | 0.18% |
| 96 | CTBICommunity Trust Bancorp, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +16.0% | 26.0% | 0.70 | −43.0% | +192% | 0.09 | — |
| 97 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.41 | 0.61% |
| 98 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.34 | 0.50% |
| 99 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.45 | 0.19% |
| 100 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.26 | 0.95% |
RIO against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against RIO, compared period by period and year by year.
How do RIO's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at RIO, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 19 popular alternatives earned more than RIO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, RIO returned 12.2% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (29.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than RIO with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | +32.2% | 38.0% |
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | +32.0% | 40.7% |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | +31.1% | 31.9% |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | +28.4% | 63.5% |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | +26.3% | 55.8% |
| NUE Nucor Corporation | +21.8% | 37.4% |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | +19.2% | 45.3% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | +18.6% | 39.1% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | +16.6% | 31.4% |
| CENX Century Aluminum Company | +15.8% | 70.6% |
| UEC Uranium Energy Corp. | +14.4% | 73.5% |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | +13.7% | 44.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| RIO This pageRio Tinto Group | +12.2% | 29.0% |
| ERO Ero Copper Corp. | +9.8% | 56.0% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | +7.4% | 35.0% |
| CSTM Constellium SE | +7.2% | 46.6% |
| MP MP Materials Corp. | +1.5% | 70.3% |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | −3.9% | 55.1% |
| CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | −8.8% | 60.2% |
| ALB Albemarle Corporation | −15.4% | 54.9% |
Has RIO consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares RIO with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than RIO helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Eight of the 19 popular alternatives, led by TGB, STLD and SCCO, outperformed RIO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- TGB, STLD and SCCO outperformed RIO in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than RIO over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| RIO Rio Tinto Group (this page) | — | −9.2% | +1.1% | −9.7% | +10.6% | +30.1% | +69.2% | +77.9% | +464% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | — | $143B | — |
| TGB QualifiedTrekor Metals Limited | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −8.3% | +13.2% | +3.1% | +42.0% | +100% | +616% | +249% | +1,667% | 63.5% | 0.71 | −90.8% | — | $2.9B | — |
| STLD QualifiedSteel Dynamics, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +6.5% | +6.3% | +17.3% | +39.9% | +68.9% | +157% | +304% | +1,018% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | — | $35B | — |
| SCCO QualifiedSouthern Copper Corporation | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +2.2% | +17.6% | +9.6% | +39.9% | +56.5% | +233% | +301% | +1,017% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | — | $171B | — |
| FCX QualifiedFreeport-McMoRan Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.3% | +17.4% | −1.4% | +33.9% | +64.8% | +111% | +89.6% | +650% | 44.9% | 0.51 | −72.6% | — | $99B | — |
| NUE QualifiedNucor Corporation | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +8.1% | +13.6% | +29.9% | +55.6% | +93.7% | +92.9% | +167% | +569% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | — | $59B | — |
| HBM QualifiedHudbay Minerals Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −11.2% | +13.6% | −7.8% | +17.9% | +44.2% | +445% | +221% | +493% | 55.8% | 0.70 | −86.3% | — | $11B | — |
| CAT QualifiedCaterpillar Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −11.2% | −15.9% | −8.8% | +22.2% | +37.7% | +203% | +288% | +936% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | — | $333B | — |
| NEM QualifiedNewmont Corporation | 4/5 short2/3 long | −5.1% | +31.2% | +2.2% | +16.1% | +24.3% | +219% | +135% | +304% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | — | $123B | — |
| UEC UraniumUranium Energy Corp. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −22.3% | −16.7% | −48.2% | −40.3% | −48.2% | +47.2% | +96.2% | +746% | 73.5% | 0.55 | −80.8% | — | $3.9B | — |
| CENX AluminumCentury Aluminum Company | 0/5 short2/3 long | −14.3% | −21.8% | −45.4% | −18.2% | −2.2% | +452% | +109% | +358% | 70.6% | 0.56 | −87.5% | — | $3.3B | — |
| BHP Industrial MaterialsBHP Group Limited | 5/5 short1/3 long | −4.9% | +3.9% | +5.1% | +38.1% | +50.2% | +71.0% | +115% | +398% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | — | $208B | — |
| TECK CopperTeck Resources Limited | 5/5 short1/3 long | −3.6% | +18.2% | +9.1% | +34.5% | +46.2% | +68.6% | +141% | +259% | 45.3% | 0.61 | −79.6% | — | $31B | — |
| ERO CopperEro Copper Corp. | 5/5 short1/3 long | −5.2% | +31.1% | +15.9% | +13.3% | +45.0% | +138% | +59.8% | — | 56.0% | 0.45 | −67.2% | — | $3.4B | — |
| AA AluminumAlcoa Corporation | 1/5 short1/3 long | −8.6% | −6.0% | −38.5% | −27.5% | +5.5% | +75.8% | −18.2% | +115% | 55.1% | 0.20 | −90.9% | — | $11B | — |
| MP Industrial MaterialsMP Materials Corp. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −21.9% | −14.6% | −41.0% | −29.0% | −52.9% | +127% | +7.8% | — | 70.3% | 0.36 | −82.0% | — | $7.0B | — |
| CSTM AluminumConstellium SE | 3/5 short0/3 long | +1.0% | −7.3% | −14.9% | +30.3% | +61.5% | +61.7% | +41.9% | +340% | 46.6% | 0.39 | −72.3% | — | $3.5B | — |
| CLF SteelCleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +13.1% | +52.0% | +40.3% | +0.4% | −15.6% | −6.4% | −37.1% | +137% | 60.2% | 0.14 | −82.4% | — | $7.8B | — |
| VALE Industrial MaterialsVale S.A. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −8.0% | −5.5% | −24.9% | +1.0% | +23.6% | +37.8% | +42.6% | +334% | 35.0% | 0.38 | −57.6% | — | $55B | — |
| ALB Chemicals - SpecialtyAlbemarle Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −15.2% | −18.7% | −50.6% | −32.9% | +0.8% | −27.6% | −56.7% | +31.3% | 54.9% | -0.03 | −83.9% | — | $11B | — |
How did RIO do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where RIO ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with RIO and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, RIO finished in the top quarter in five of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 14 of 20.
- RIO finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, ERO came out ahead of RIO most often, in five of the eight years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of RIO; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places RIO among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of RIO | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIO This pageRio Tinto Group | — | +44.5% | −15.4% | +11.1% | +18.4% | −0.4% | +36.2% | +37.5% | −2.9% | +44.9% | +39.2% | −33.4% | −15.3% | +0.6% | +22.4% | −30.5% | +35.3% | +195% | −78.5% | +102% | +23.6% | +57.1% | +9.7% | +45.6% | +5.1% | +12.6% | −20.9% | +115% | −8.9% | −16.4% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 29 | 14 of 20 | 13 of 20 | 13 of 20 | 6 of 20 | 17 of 20 | 10 of 19 | 4 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 11 of 18 | 14 of 18 | 7 of 18 | 10 of 18 | 8 of 17 | 2 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 9 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 12 of 17 | 4 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 5 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 13 of 15 | 7 of 13 | 6 of 13 | 6 of 13 | 2 of 13 | 5 of 13 | 8 of 13 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | 10 of 29 | +192% | +38.6% | −4.8% | −28.3% | +55.3% | +175% | +1.5% | −79.7% | +173% | +151% | −67.0% | −51.4% | −29.3% | +9.9% | −48.0% | +24.4% | +640% | −89.0% | +100% | +112% | −29.1% | +3.0% | +519% | −6.9% | −59.7% | −49.0% | −47.6% | −4.3% | −50.1% |
| STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +50.7% | −2.0% | +22.8% | +60.1% | +71.4% | +12.4% | +16.8% | −29.0% | +23.3% | +103% | −6.8% | +3.5% | +46.2% | +7.8% | −26.1% | +5.2% | +62.4% | −61.8% | +86.0% | +86.0% | −5.2% | +66.0% | +90.5% | +3.8% | +5.8% | −31.1% | +35.7% | −26.6% | −16.3% |
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 18 of 29 | +66.7% | +10.7% | +50.3% | +4.5% | −0.4% | +59.0% | +44.6% | −33.0% | +50.3% | +23.1% | −6.2% | −0.3% | −22.5% | +41.2% | −33.4% | +56.3% | +109% | −50.2% | +111% | +79.5% | +60.3% | +7.2% | +236% | +23.5% | −4.2% | −14.2% | +65.5% | −26.5% | −1.5% |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 12 of 29 | +35.4% | −9.4% | +13.7% | −7.3% | +61.4% | +99.1% | +29.6% | −45.1% | +43.8% | +94.9% | −70.2% | −35.8% | +19.9% | −4.0% | −36.9% | +52.7% | +228% | −75.5% | +86.9% | +11.6% | +49.1% | −6.6% | +154% | +25.5% | +56.5% | −59.5% | +102% | −32.9% | −45.6% |
| NUE Nucor Corporation | 12 of 29 | +42.0% | −31.9% | +33.8% | +17.4% | +118% | −1.8% | +11.9% | −16.4% | +9.6% | +52.2% | −14.9% | −5.4% | +27.6% | +13.1% | −6.3% | −2.8% | +4.2% | −19.4% | +12.8% | +70.5% | +30.9% | +89.1% | +37.7% | −20.6% | +35.7% | −26.6% | +28.2% | −9.4% | −4.5% |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 11 of 22 | +145% | +47.2% | +9.1% | −29.9% | +3.9% | +69.4% | −11.5% | −46.3% | +54.9% | +49.3% | −55.8% | +6.2% | −17.8% | +3.3% | −44.7% | +41.9% | +407% | −87.0% | +4.7% | +272% | +179% | −67.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 18 of 29 | +60.3% | +24.7% | +25.9% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +27.0% | +19.5% | −17.6% | +75.0% | +42.1% | −23.0% | +3.5% | +3.4% | +1.6% | −1.5% | +68.5% | +33.2% | −36.8% | +20.5% | +7.8% | +20.7% | +19.7% | +86.1% | −9.8% | +13.7% | +4.1% | +4.7% | −3.0% | +31.2% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 10 of 29 | +173% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −20.8% | +7.4% | +40.3% | +30.5% | −6.2% | +10.9% | +90.1% | −4.4% | −17.2% | −48.5% | −20.4% | −0.6% | +31.0% | +17.3% | −15.9% | +9.1% | −14.8% | +21.4% | −8.1% | +68.2% | +52.6% | +12.7% | −29.9% | +35.0% | −37.7% | −34.1% |
| UEC Uranium Energy Corp. | 9 of 18 | +74.6% | +4.5% | +65.0% | +15.8% | +90.3% | +91.5% | −26.5% | −29.4% | +58.0% | +5.7% | −39.4% | −12.5% | −21.9% | −16.3% | −49.3% | +59.8% | +1,119% | −89.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CENX Century Aluminum Company | 13 of 29 | +115% | +50.1% | +48.4% | −50.6% | +50.1% | +46.7% | +2.9% | −62.8% | +129% | +93.7% | −81.9% | +133% | +19.4% | +2.9% | −45.2% | −4.1% | +61.9% | −81.5% | +20.8% | +70.3% | −0.2% | +38.1% | +157% | −43.8% | +18.5% | −22.8% | +63.4% | −28.9% | −20.7% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 11 of 29 | +28.9% | −24.6% | +16.4% | +29.4% | +2.0% | +25.3% | +24.6% | +10.5% | +33.8% | +41.9% | −38.1% | −27.9% | −9.8% | +14.9% | −22.0% | +24.5% | +85.2% | −37.4% | +79.4% | +21.2% | +42.0% | +34.3% | +62.6% | +50.4% | +8.7% | −16.6% | +91.5% | −18.9% | −32.0% |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | 11 of 23 | +19.2% | −2.6% | +14.0% | +33.8% | +59.8% | +5.8% | −18.7% | −16.9% | +33.4% | +421% | −71.1% | −44.9% | −25.8% | +5.9% | −42.1% | +78.7% | +611% | −86.1% | −2.8% | +47.1% | +81.7% | +87.5% | +148% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ERO Ero Copper Corp. | 5 of 8 | +110% | −14.6% | +14.8% | −10.1% | −5.7% | −11.0% | +152% | +21.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | 11 of 29 | +42.5% | +12.5% | −24.3% | −23.1% | +159% | +7.1% | −19.1% | −50.7% | +91.8% | +28.3% | −36.8% | +49.9% | +24.3% | +1.7% | −43.3% | −3.6% | +47.7% | −68.2% | +24.3% | +4.2% | −3.7% | −15.7% | +71.3% | −34.5% | +8.0% | −17.9% | +126% | +7.7% | +11.9% |
| MP MP Materials Corp. | 2 of 5 | +224% | −21.4% | −18.3% | −46.5% | +41.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CSTM Constellium SE | 5 of 12 | +83.5% | −48.5% | +68.7% | −34.0% | +28.0% | +4.4% | +91.7% | −37.3% | +89.0% | −23.4% | −53.1% | −29.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 14 of 29 | +41.3% | −54.0% | +26.8% | −26.0% | +49.5% | +77.3% | +12.8% | +6.6% | −14.2% | +431% | −77.8% | −71.7% | −30.4% | −35.3% | −19.2% | +70.8% | +81.5% | −48.8% | +110% | +10.7% | +71.9% | +104% | +157% | +8.8% | −13.3% | −26.3% | −19.3% | −9.3% | +4.3% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 10 of 23 | +66.3% | −38.8% | +1.6% | +32.5% | −1.7% | +32.0% | +2.7% | +12.3% | +62.2% | +134% | −57.8% | −44.1% | −23.2% | +3.3% | −34.0% | +21.2% | +145% | −61.8% | +123% | +47.5% | +46.9% | +50.6% | +108% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ALB Albemarle Corporation | 17 of 29 | +67.7% | −39.5% | −32.8% | −6.6% | +59.8% | +105% | −3.3% | −38.9% | +49.7% | +56.2% | −4.7% | −3.5% | +3.5% | +22.2% | −6.5% | +55.3% | +66.2% | −45.1% | +16.1% | +89.7% | +0.9% | +31.5% | +7.7% | +20.7% | −0.8% | +32.0% | −17.7% | +3.4% | +33.5% |
Risk and diversification
How RIO has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were RIO's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents RIO's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1990, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of RIO's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: RIO fell 47.1% from June 1997 to August 1998, while the S&P 500 rose 8.6%.
- The slowest recovery came after RIO fell 89.0% from May to December 2008; it did not regain that peak until November 2020, 12 years later.
Green means RIO fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | RIO fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −89.0% | −39.6% | May 2008 | Dec 2008 | 7 months | Nov 2020 | 11.9 years |
| No named crash | −47.1% | +8.6% | Jun 1997 | Aug 1998 | 14 months | Apr 1999 | 8 months |
| Dot-com bust | −39.6% | −7.2% | Jan 2000 | Oct 2000 | 9 months | Jul 2003 | 2.8 years |
| 2022 bear market | −35.5% | −10.1% | May 2021 | Sep 2022 | 16 months | Jan 2023 | 4 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −30.7% | −9.5% | Nov 2007 | Jan 2008 | 2 months | Apr 2008 | 3 months |
How did RIO do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far RIO, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, NEM held up best, falling less than RIO in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- RIO fell less than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when RIO fell 33.9% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than RIO.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIO This pageRio Tinto Group | — | −2.6% | −35.3% | −30.0% | −13.2% | −5.3% | −43.9% | −41.3% | 0.0% | −89.0% | −33.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | 0 of 10 | −6.3% | −61.9% | −50.2% | −44.2% | −5.4% | −55.6% | −48.6% | −1.2% | −91.2% | −82.1% |
| STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −11.7% | −30.6% | −47.8% | −37.1% | −3.6% | −25.6% | −43.0% | −0.7% | −87.1% | −41.6% |
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 3 of 10 | −3.4% | −43.0% | −38.7% | −32.0% | −5.3% | −26.0% | −32.9% | −0.4% | −78.5% | −42.5% |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 1 of 10 | −7.2% | −51.3% | −56.1% | −32.8% | −8.4% | −72.2% | −46.7% | −2.1% | −86.4% | −51.4% |
| NUE Nucor Corporation | 3 of 10 | −10.3% | −40.8% | −41.5% | −23.5% | −6.0% | −24.3% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −68.3% | −44.8% |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 1 of 9 | −9.2% | −63.3% | −57.9% | −30.1% | −10.0% | −74.5% | −38.9% | 0.0% | −91.9% | — |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 4 of 10 | −9.7% | −30.1% | −33.1% | −28.5% | −7.3% | −26.0% | −33.2% | −2.2% | −73.3% | −42.5% |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 6 of 10 | −1.0% | −51.8% | −24.5% | −9.5% | −6.0% | −20.2% | −12.0% | −2.3% | −61.5% | −53.0% |
| UEC Uranium Energy Corp. | 1 of 9 | −4.8% | −53.7% | −56.3% | −33.1% | −10.8% | −50.2% | −35.9% | 0.0% | −96.0% | — |
| CENX Century Aluminum Company | 0 of 10 | −19.8% | −82.1% | −51.8% | −48.6% | −5.2% | −59.6% | −45.5% | −4.3% | −98.7% | −72.6% |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 4 of 10 | −2.2% | −31.8% | −38.1% | −12.8% | −6.4% | −49.4% | −30.7% | 0.0% | −73.7% | −32.6% |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | 0 of 9 | −8.2% | −43.6% | −54.0% | −26.9% | −8.1% | −65.4% | −48.9% | 0.0% | −94.8% | — |
| ERO Ero Copper Corp. | 0 of 5 | −6.2% | −49.1% | −53.9% | −29.2% | −6.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | 2 of 10 | −12.4% | −64.5% | −67.2% | −42.6% | −7.1% | −38.6% | −43.6% | 0.0% | −87.8% | −59.3% |
| MP MP Materials Corp. | 0 of 2 | −7.9% | −53.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CSTM Constellium SE | 0 of 6 | −11.0% | −52.1% | −71.4% | −47.9% | −8.4% | −58.2% | — | — | — | — |
| CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 1 of 10 | −10.0% | −60.5% | −59.6% | −41.3% | −2.6% | −71.3% | −51.4% | 0.0% | −89.8% | −46.5% |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 2 of 9 | −3.1% | −41.4% | −45.5% | −20.9% | −5.3% | −61.1% | −33.4% | −0.8% | −79.5% | — |
| ALB Albemarle Corporation | 5 of 10 | −11.9% | −30.0% | −45.7% | −32.0% | −2.2% | −20.3% | −43.0% | −3.8% | −66.3% | −30.7% |
How closely does RIO move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares RIO with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, RIO captured 98% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 72% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.63. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only NEM had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than RIO's 1.35, out of 17 popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than RIO's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIO This pageRio Tinto Group | 98% | 72% | 1.35 | 0.63 |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | 68% | 45% | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 139% | 103% | 1.35 | 1.13 |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 148% | 122% | 1.21 | 1.27 |
| STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 150% | 129% | 1.16 | 1.48 |
| VALE Vale S.A. | 100% | 88% | 1.13 | 0.74 |
| BHP BHP Group Limited | 106% | 97% | 1.10 | 0.87 |
| UEC Uranium Energy Corp. | 159% | 153% | 1.04 | 1.80 |
| TGB Trekor Metals Limited | 217% | 214% | 1.01 | 1.89 |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 164% | 181% | 0.90 | 1.74 |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | 115% | 128% | 0.90 | 1.10 |
| NUE Nucor Corporation | 154% | 176% | 0.87 | 1.65 |
| HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 193% | 234% | 0.82 | 1.95 |
| CENX Century Aluminum Company | 218% | 296% | 0.74 | 2.41 |
| CSTM Constellium SE | 171% | 243% | 0.71 | 2.12 |
| AA Alcoa Corporation | 187% | 303% | 0.62 | 2.17 |
| CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 172% | 276% | 0.62 | 2.19 |
| ALB Albemarle Corporation | 128% | 221% | 0.58 | 1.48 |
What diversifies RIO?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with RIO's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing RIO with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in RIO into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+14.1% for RIO alone, +19.1% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and HDV have moved largely independently of RIO over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.42 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in seven of the ten calendar years in which RIO lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which RIO lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% RIO and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2021 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIO Rio Tinto Group (this page) | 1.00 | +77.9% | 0.54 | −15.4% | −0.4% | −2.9% | −33.4% | −15.3% | −30.5% | −78.5% | −20.9% | −8.9% | −16.4% | 26.8% | +14.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.30 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +18.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | 22.3% | +17.2% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.35 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +23.1% | −8.7% | −25.3% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 22.6% | +15.0% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.42 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +19.6% | −3.0% | −0.3% | +12.6% | — | — | — | — | — | 22.8% | +14.2% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.31 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +42.1% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +6.8% | −44.7% | — | — | — | 24.5% | +19.7% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.45 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | +19.6% | −9.5% | +4.1% | +3.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 22.5% | +14.6% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.13 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +22.7% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.3% | +16.5% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.30 | +177% | 0.93 | +5.6% | +53.3% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +24.4% | — | — | 23.5% | +16.7% |
| VTV Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 0.43 | +76.6% | 0.90 | +16.0% | +26.5% | −5.5% | −1.0% | +13.2% | +1.1% | −35.9% | — | — | — | 22.8% | +14.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2021 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2000 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIO Rio Tinto Group (this page) | 1.00 | +77.9% | 0.54 | −15.4% | −0.4% | −2.9% | −33.4% | −15.3% | −30.5% | −78.5% | −20.9% | −8.9% | −16.4% | 26.8% | +14.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.06 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | −0.4% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +8.1% | −39.6% | +108% | +51.7% | +29.1% | 22.4% | +19.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.01 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +37.9% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +12.9% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −2.3% | — | — | 24.5% | +32.9% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.01 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +89.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −10.4% | −17.0% | −15.2% | −71.1% | −9.5% | — | 23.3% | +28.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.02 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +44.2% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +61.2% | +46.9% | +96.3% | 22.1% | +19.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.23 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +61.0% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 23.8% | +21.5% |
Common questions
What was RIO's worst drawdown?
RIO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1990 was 89.0%, from May to December 2008. It took about 12 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were RIO's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, RIO's best year was 2009, when it returned 195%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -78.5%.
Is there a better investment than RIO?
Among RIO's popular alternatives, CAT and BHP earned more than RIO over the past 5 years with similar volatility: CAT returned 31.1% a year at 31.9% volatility, against 12.2% a year at 29.0%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, GLD (gold) and RTX (aerospace & defense) earned more than RIO with less volatility over the past 5 years. GLD returned 17.7% a year at 18.9% volatility, against 12.2% a year at 29.0%.
Is RIO more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. RIO's volatility over the past 5 years was 29.0%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, RIO's return lands within 29.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is RIO's Sharpe ratio?
RIO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.54, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so RIO earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is RIO with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, RIO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.34 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against RIO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a RIO holding.
What are the best alternatives to RIO?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, eight outperformed RIO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: TGB, STLD and SCCO.
Did RIO outperform the S&P 500?
RIO finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +44.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did RIO do in stock market crashes?
RIO fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in six of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when RIO fell 33.9% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies RIO?
These had a low correlation with RIO over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.30), EMLP (correlation 0.35) and HDV (correlation 0.42); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.06), CLS (correlation 0.01) and FIX (correlation 0.01). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than RIO's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of RIO's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.