Relative Intelligence · Semiconductors

How NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on NXPI alone. It places NXPI (NXP Semiconductors N.V.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where NXPI stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: NXPI's full trading record, from August 2010 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowNXPI is 28.0% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. NXPI has gone against the market, falling 10.7% over the past 3 months while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is NXPI's own: it fell 10.7% over the past 3 months while the semiconductors ETF SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) fell 2.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its semiconductor peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: ADI (Analog Devices) rose 6.9%, while STM (STMicroelectronics) fell 25.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, NXPI rose 10.0% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (34.9% against 89.3%). NXPI led its semiconductor peers in 2023, then fell behind TXN (Texas Instruments) and ADI (Analog Devices) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termNXPI turned $10,000 into $25,900 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross five sell-offs, NXPI has typically fallen about twice as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, NXPI has a correlation of 0.68 over 5 years, more closely than 98% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- MSFT (Microsoft, software) and CSCO (Cisco Systems, communications equipment) earned more than NXPI with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 5.7% a year at 42.3%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 5.7% at 42.3% for NXPI.
- Whole market
- 1,292 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NXPI with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in NXPI have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in NXPI over the past 16 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of NXPI over the same span and NXPI's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: NXPI began trading on August 6, 2010, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash. It covers the most recent 16 years of NXPI's record, starting at the end of September 2010.
- $10,000 invested in NXPI at the end of September 2010 would have grown to $218,536 by September 2026, more than the $88,503 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of NXPI, and AVGO finished highest, at $2,208,925.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2010 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 101 of the 2,048 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NXPI; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AVGO$2M+21,989% total · +40.1% a year
- MPWR$968,554+9,586% total · +33.1% a year
- TSM$640,729+6,307% total · +29.7% a year
- ASML$547,350+5,374% total · +28.4% a year
- MSFT$278,002+2,680% total · +23.1% a year
- NXPI$218,536+2,085% total · +21.3% a year
- ADI$180,658+1,707% total · +19.8% a year
- TXN$155,861+1,459% total · +18.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$88,503+785% total · +14.6% a year
- SLAB$60,458+505% total · +11.9% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,907 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NXPI; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MTSI$43,907+339% total · +34.4% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- MPWR$28,834+188% total · +23.6% a year
- ADI$25,751+158% total · +20.8% a year
- ASML$25,473+155% total · +20.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- TXN$16,791+67.9% total · +10.9% a year
- TEL$16,677+66.8% total · +10.8% a year
- SLAB$15,810+58.1% total · +9.6% a year
- NXPI$13,295+32.9% total · +5.9% a year
NXPI at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: NXPI began trading on August 6, 2010, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash.
- NXPI is still 28.0% below its all-time high.
- NXPI's deepest decline since it began trading in 2010 was 60.0%, from April to October 2011. It took 22 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 15 full calendar years, NXPI's best was 2019, when it returned 75.7%, and its worst was 2018, when it lost 37.1%. It lost money in four of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $60B
- Industry
- Semiconductors
- Price history from
- August 2010
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +10.0%total return
- Past 3 years
- +34.9%+10.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +31.9%+5.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +159%+10.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +75.7%2019
- Worst calendar year
- −37.1%2018
- Losing years
- 4 of 15full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 42.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.34return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −60.0%Apr 2011 to Oct 2011
- From its all-time high
- −28.0%below the peak
NXPI against the whole market
Where NXPI ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does NXPI rank among all stocks?
This section ranks NXPI on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how NXPI stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- NXPI lands in the broad middle of the market on every measure here. NXPI's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 27% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | NXPI | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +10.0% | 1,591 of 3,287 | top 48% |
| 3-year return | +34.9% | 1,775 of 3,017 | bottom 42% |
| 5-year return | +31.9% | 1,318 of 2,893 | top 46% |
| 10-year return | +159% | 1,031 of 2,202 | top 47% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 42.3% | 1,568 of 2,893 | bottom 47% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.34 | 1,427 of 2,893 | top 49% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −53.3% | 584 of 2,187 | top 27% |
What has beaten NXPI on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). NXPI sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than NXPI with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 706 stocks and 586 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than NXPI over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 36% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half NXPI's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 41% less than NXPI's 42.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.34 for NXPI. PBR-A earned the most, 51.8% a year, while still swinging less than NXPI (37.5% against 42.3%).
- Among NXPI's popular alternatives, TSM, ADI and TEL are in the region. TSM earned 31.5% a year against 5.7% a year for NXPI, at 38.5% volatility, 9% less than NXPI's 42.3%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to NXPI; faint dots are 90 more of the 1,292 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than NXPI?
Investments that beat NXPI over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among NXPI's popular alternatives, ADI, TXN and TEL earned more than NXPI with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 5.7% a year at 42.3%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSFT (software) and CSCO (communications equipment) earned more than NXPI with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 5.7% a year at 42.3%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 5.7% at 42.3% for NXPI.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat NXPI over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks NXPI's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than NXPI follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than NXPI's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× NXPI's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than NXPI's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with NXPI?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +5.7% | 42.3% | 0.34 | −53.3% | +159% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.68 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against NXPI. 11 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.80 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | 0.83 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.5% | 28.7% | 0.46 | −47.7% | +311% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.4% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | +1,628% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Semiconductors and the categories next to it (Semiconductor Equipment, Computer Hardware, Communications Equipment, Software), plus NXPI's specific themes. 70 of 145 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.41 | — | ||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.34 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.23 | — | ||
SSNCSS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. · Software | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +4.7% | 25.2% | 0.31 | −48.9% | +200% | 0.28 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,767 of 3,469 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.47 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.07 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.07 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.68 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.68 | 0.03% | ||
FCNCAFirst Citizens BancShares, Inc. · Regional Banks | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.4% | 41.4% | 0.64 | −47.5% | +662% | 0.29 | — | |
NOBLProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · US Dividend Equity | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +6.5% | 14.5% | 0.51 | −35.4% | +172% | 0.41 | 0.35% | |
What these numbers mean for NXPI
- Annual return
- NXPI returned 5.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $13,200. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- NXPI's volatility over the past 5 years was 42.3%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NXPI's return lands within 42.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- NXPI's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.34, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NXPI earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- NXPI's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 53.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 53.3% fall takes a 114% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, NXPI's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.68 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NXPI instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NXPI holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,292 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than NXPI with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with NXPI | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.47 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.07 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.50 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.07 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.68 | 0.03% | |
| 6 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.68 | 0.03% | |
| 7 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.16 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.21 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.01 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.07 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.32 | — | |
| 12 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.34 | 0.48% |
| 13 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.06 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.72 | 0.18% | |
| 15 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.26 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.17 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.10 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.14 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.20 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.56 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.50 | 0.03% | |
| 22 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.00 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | -0.02 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.49 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.45 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.70 | 0.09% | |
| 27 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.00 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | -0.01 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.51 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +198% | 0.62 | 0.03% | |
| 31 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.23 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.55 | 0.04% | |
| 33 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.05 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.51 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.44 | 0.06% | |
| 36 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.32 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.53 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.28 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.70 | 0.06% | |
| 40 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | -0.08 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.11 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.27 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.1% | 0.57 | −39.0% | +211% | 0.59 | 0.20% | |
| 44 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.01 | — |
| 45 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.15 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.23 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | -0.16 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.23 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +9.5% | 16.8% | 0.63 | −34.9% | +155% | 0.63 | 0.03% | |
| 50 | Whole market | +8.3% | 23.3% | 0.46 | −40.5% | +446% | 0.39 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.65 | 0.04% | |
| 52 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.59 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +9.4% | 28.3% | 0.46 | −42.5% | +176% | 0.18 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +10.8% | 21.9% | 0.58 | −41.6% | +160% | 0.18 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +10.9% | 24.2% | 0.55 | −44.4% | +516% | 0.02 | — | |
| 56 | Same or nearby category | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.32 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +8.2% | 19.4% | 0.51 | −45.3% | +169% | 0.56 | 0.05% | |
| 58 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.11 | — |
| 59 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.52 | — | |
| 60 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +157% | 0.46 | 0.31% |
| 61 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.21 | 0.08% | |
| 62 | Whole market | +8.9% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | +407% | 0.28 | — | |
| 63 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | -0.10 | — |
| 64 | Whole market | +12.5% | 31.3% | 0.53 | −37.1% | +303% | 0.06 | — | |
| 65 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.55 | 0.25% |
| 66 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.49 | — |
| 67 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.28 | 0.08% |
| 68 | RDVYFirst Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −40.6% | +322% | 0.59 | 0.47% |
| 69 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | 0.12 | — |
| 70 | Same or nearby category | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.41 | — | |
| 71 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.64 | 0.20% |
| 72 | EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.41 | — |
| 73 | SDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 14.0% | 0.59 | −36.7% | +157% | 0.43 | 0.35% |
| 74 | RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | +215% | -0.11 | — |
| 75 | MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +10.9% | 22.1% | 0.58 | −34.1% | +336% | 0.57 | 0.15% |
| 76 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.56 | 0.35% |
| 77 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.66 | 0.40% |
| 78 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.8% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +340% | 0.18 | — |
| 79 | CACICACI International Inc · Business Services | Whole market | +16.6% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | +499% | 0.04 | — |
| 80 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.67 | 0.15% |
| 81 | AIZAssurant, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −44.6% | +312% | 0.20 | — |
| 82 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.29 | — |
| 83 | CNACNA Financial Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +9.2% | 21.6% | 0.52 | −45.9% | +183% | 0.01 | — |
| 84 | MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.56 | 0.46% |
| 85 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | -0.06 | — |
| 86 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.21 | — |
| 87 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.51 | 0.60% |
| 88 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.37 | — | |
| 89 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.76 | 0.40% |
| 90 | Popular alternative | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.80 | — | |
| 91 | MSMMSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.1% | 0.63 | −48.2% | +184% | 0.37 | — |
| 92 | GUNRNorthern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF · Natural Resources Equity | Whole market | +10.1% | 18.8% | 0.60 | −43.0% | +173% | 0.30 | 0.47% |
| 93 | WTMWhite Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +15.4% | 23.6% | 0.73 | −40.2% | +169% | 0.07 | — |
| 94 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.74 | 0.50% |
| 95 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.53 | 0.20% |
| 96 | Popular alternative | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | 0.83 | — | |
| 97 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.60 | 0.25% |
| 98 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.32 | 0.40% |
| 99 | XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF · US Mid-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.7% | 20.5% | 0.56 | −36.9% | +240% | 0.53 | 0.30% |
| 100 | FTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.4% | 0.99 | −20.6% | +158% | 0.56 | 0.95% |
NXPI against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against NXPI, compared period by period and year by year.
How do NXPI's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at NXPI, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Four of the 19 popular alternatives, led by TSM, ADI and TXN, were both more rewarding and calmer than NXPI over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, NXPI returned 5.7% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (42.3% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than NXPI with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | +32.0% | 47.3% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | +20.9% | 55.4% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | +19.5% | 34.1% |
| SITM SiTime Corporation | +17.5% | 77.8% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | +17.3% | 43.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | +10.7% | 55.9% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | +9.9% | 33.7% |
| TEL TE Connectivity plc | +9.5% | 28.7% |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | +8.2% | 42.8% |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | +8.1% | 48.3% |
| NXPI This pageNXP Semiconductors N.V. | +5.7% | 42.3% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | +2.5% | 45.9% |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | +2.2% | 47.7% |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | +1.1% | 53.4% |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | −1.1% | 50.0% |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | −7.8% | 54.7% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | −10.8% | 42.9% |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | −23.2% | 41.4% |
Has NXPI consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares NXPI with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than NXPI helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Eight of the 20 popular alternatives, led by ASML, TSM and ADI, outperformed NXPI in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- ASML, TSM and ADI outperformed NXPI in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- AVGO, ADI and MPWR earned more for the risk they took than NXPI (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than NXPI over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. (this page) | — | +2.2% | −10.7% | +8.2% | +8.8% | +10.0% | +34.9% | +31.9% | +159% | 42.3% | 0.34 | −53.3% | — | $60B | — |
| ASML QualifiedASML Holding N.V. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.7% | −6.1% | +10.8% | +40.8% | +57.5% | +188% | +123% | +1,628% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | — | $630B | — |
| TSM QualifiedTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| ADI QualifiedAnalog Devices, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +3.7% | +6.9% | +4.8% | +46.3% | +63.3% | +150% | +144% | +652% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | — | $192B | — |
| TXN QualifiedTexas Instruments Incorporated | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +2.6% | −1.7% | +20.1% | +59.1% | +58.7% | +105% | +60.5% | +424% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | — | $254B | — |
| MPWR QualifiedMonolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −2.1% | −5.9% | −16.0% | +34.0% | +21.9% | +204% | +159% | +1,659% | 55.4% | 0.62 | −51.6% | — | $61B | — |
| MTSI QualifiedMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −5.8% | −2.5% | −6.5% | +50.3% | +87.4% | +249% | +302% | +588% | 47.3% | 0.83 | −80.8% | — | $20B | — |
| SLAB QualifiedSilicon Laboratories Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +0.1% | +1.7% | +3.3% | +67.6% | +60.8% | +115% | +47.7% | +277% | 48.3% | 0.39 | −59.0% | — | $7.4B | — |
| ON QualifiedON Semiconductor Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | +5.4% | −12.8% | −11.6% | +33.4% | +37.8% | −10.9% | +66.0% | +540% | 55.9% | 0.46 | −70.4% | — | $29B | — |
| QCOM SemiconductorsQUALCOMM Incorporated | 2/5 short3/3 long | −9.5% | +3.7% | +28.9% | +3.2% | +7.4% | +72.4% | +48.3% | +239% | 42.8% | 0.40 | −44.3% | — | $188B | — |
| TEL SemiconductorsTE Connectivity plc | 1/5 short3/3 long | +1.7% | +5.6% | −13.1% | −7.4% | −4.1% | +90.6% | +57.4% | +311% | 28.7% | 0.46 | −47.7% | — | $62B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| SITM SemiconductorsSiTime Corporation | 2/5 short2/3 long | −22.1% | −10.5% | −5.9% | +34.4% | +70.6% | +364% | +124% | — | 77.8% | 0.60 | −78.1% | — | $15B | — |
| DIOD SemiconductorsDiodes Incorporated | 3/5 short1/3 long | −5.9% | −2.2% | −11.7% | +66.0% | +49.4% | +14.1% | −5.6% | +324% | 50.0% | 0.23 | −69.5% | — | $3.9B | — |
| MCHP SemiconductorsMicrochip Technology Incorporated | 3/5 short1/3 long | +1.4% | −5.2% | −4.6% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +8.5% | +13.0% | +207% | 45.9% | 0.28 | −63.8% | — | $41B | — |
| STM SemiconductorsSTMicroelectronics N.V. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −11.2% | −25.8% | +3.3% | +68.2% | +52.9% | +18.8% | +11.6% | +525% | 47.7% | 0.28 | −66.6% | — | $41B | — |
| SYNA SemiconductorsSynaptics Incorporated | 5/5 short0/3 long | +23.2% | +3.4% | +41.4% | +55.1% | +61.9% | +29.9% | −33.2% | +72.3% | 54.7% | 0.12 | −85.3% | — | $4.7B | — |
| SWKS SemiconductorsSkyworks Solutions, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −8.4% | +36.0% | +37.9% | +28.9% | +10.2% | −2.8% | −43.5% | +29.2% | 42.9% | -0.05 | −72.9% | — | $12B | — |
| ALGM SemiconductorsAllegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −4.5% | −26.9% | −16.6% | +26.0% | +11.2% | +17.5% | +5.5% | — | 53.4% | 0.28 | −68.7% | — | $6.3B | — |
| GFS SemiconductorsGLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −3.0% | −17.0% | −19.7% | +28.0% | +32.7% | −13.2% | — | — | — | — | −61.5% | — | $26B | — |
| APTV Auto - PartsAptiv PLC | 1/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | −21.4% | −25.9% | −42.6% | −46.0% | −51.0% | −73.3% | −10.6% | 41.4% | -0.43 | −75.8% | — | $9.4B | — |
How did NXPI do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2011, along with where NXPI ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with NXPI and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: NXPI began trading on August 6, 2010, so the table starts with 2011, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash.
- Among its popular alternatives, AVGO came out ahead of NXPI most often, in 12 of the 15 years both traded.
- NXPI finished ahead of the S&P 500 in nine of its 15 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, NXPI finished in the top quarter in four of 15 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 13 of 21.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of NXPI; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places NXPI among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of NXPI | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXPI This pageNXP Semiconductors N.V. | — | +6.4% | −8.0% | +48.4% | −29.2% | +44.8% | +26.6% | +75.7% | −37.0% | +19.5% | +16.3% | +10.3% | +66.3% | +74.5% | +71.2% | −26.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 15 | 13 of 21 | 12 of 21 | 3 of 21 | 12 of 21 | 8 of 20 | 17 of 19 | 6 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 14 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 4 of 18 | 1 of 18 | 2 of 17 | 14 of 16 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 15 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 8 of 15 | +55.8% | −7.7% | +39.9% | −30.5% | +64.1% | +66.3% | +93.2% | −9.7% | +56.5% | +27.9% | −17.1% | +16.2% | +46.9% | +19.7% | +10.4% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 7 of 15 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 7 of 15 | +29.8% | +8.8% | +23.4% | −4.9% | +21.0% | +26.9% | +41.3% | −1.6% | +25.3% | +35.0% | +2.4% | +12.2% | +24.7% | +21.2% | −2.4% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 7 of 15 | −4.5% | +13.1% | +6.4% | −9.9% | +17.5% | +31.7% | +39.6% | −7.2% | +46.8% | +36.7% | +5.1% | +25.1% | +46.3% | +7.9% | −8.8% |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 10 of 15 | +54.4% | −5.5% | +79.8% | −27.8% | +35.5% | +107% | +54.8% | +4.5% | +38.2% | +30.1% | +30.0% | +44.9% | +55.6% | +54.9% | −8.8% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 7 of 13 | +31.8% | +39.8% | +47.6% | −19.6% | +42.3% | +107% | +83.3% | −55.4% | −29.7% | +13.2% | +30.7% | +84.1% | +13.5% | — | — |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 6 of 15 | +5.2% | −6.1% | −2.5% | −34.3% | +62.1% | +9.8% | +47.2% | −10.8% | +35.9% | +33.9% | +1.9% | +10.0% | +3.6% | −3.7% | −5.7% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 7 of 15 | −14.1% | −24.5% | +33.9% | −8.2% | +108% | +34.3% | +47.7% | −21.1% | +64.1% | +30.2% | −3.3% | +22.9% | +16.9% | −8.7% | −21.9% |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 6 of 15 | +13.8% | +8.3% | +35.1% | −38.6% | +22.3% | +77.1% | +60.8% | −7.6% | +1.1% | +35.1% | −30.6% | +2.3% | +22.4% | +14.9% | +12.3% |
| TEL TE Connectivity plc | 7 of 15 | +61.6% | +3.5% | +24.6% | −27.7% | +35.1% | +28.9% | +29.4% | −18.9% | +39.9% | +9.8% | +4.2% | +16.9% | +51.6% | +23.4% | −11.1% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 12 of 15 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% | +46.1% | +93.4% | +70.0% | +12.0% | +3.0% |
| SITM SiTime Corporation | 4 of 6 | +64.6% | +75.7% | +20.1% | −65.3% | +161% | +339% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | 3 of 15 | −20.0% | −23.4% | +5.8% | −30.7% | +55.8% | +25.1% | +74.7% | +12.5% | +11.7% | +11.7% | −16.7% | +17.0% | +35.8% | −18.5% | −21.1% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 7 of 15 | +14.6% | −34.9% | +30.9% | −18.0% | +27.5% | +33.7% | +48.1% | −16.7% | +39.5% | +41.6% | +6.3% | +4.0% | +42.4% | −7.1% | +10.3% |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 6 of 15 | +5.3% | −49.6% | +41.6% | −26.8% | +32.4% | +38.9% | +96.4% | −35.7% | +95.1% | +76.9% | −6.7% | −2.5% | +15.2% | +30.1% | −40.6% |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | 5 of 15 | −3.0% | −33.1% | +19.9% | −67.1% | +200% | +46.6% | +76.8% | −6.8% | −25.5% | −33.3% | +16.7% | +32.9% | +72.9% | −0.6% | +2.6% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 5 of 15 | −25.5% | −18.9% | +26.5% | −40.0% | +2.7% | +28.4% | +84.1% | −28.3% | +28.7% | −1.2% | +6.7% | +156% | +40.6% | +25.2% | −43.4% |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 2 of 5 | +20.7% | −27.8% | +0.8% | −17.0% | +35.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 1 of 4 | −18.6% | −29.2% | +12.4% | −17.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | 6 of 14 | +25.8% | −32.6% | −3.7% | −43.5% | +26.6% | +37.5% | +55.9% | −27.1% | +57.6% | −20.1% | +19.3% | +22.7% | +59.4% | +77.6% | — |
Risk and diversification
How NXPI has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were NXPI's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents NXPI's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2010, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: NXPI began trading on August 6, 2010, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of NXPI's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 22 months, after NXPI fell 60.0% from April to October 2011.
Green means NXPI fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | NXPI fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 euro debt crisis | −60.0% | −17.6% | Apr 2011 | Oct 2011 | 6 months | Aug 2013 | 22 months |
| Covid crash | −53.3% | −28.8% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Oct 2020 | 7 months |
| No named crash | −46.5% | −11.3% | Jul 2024 | Apr 2025 | 9 months | Apr 2026 | 12 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −45.8% | −11.7% | Feb 2018 | Dec 2018 | 10 months | Dec 2019 | 12 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −43.0% | −10.8% | May 2015 | Feb 2016 | 9 months | Aug 2017 | 18 months |
How did NXPI do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far NXPI, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: NXPI began trading on August 6, 2010, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- NXPI fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the seven crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when NXPI fell 35.5% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, ADI held up best, falling less than NXPI in six of the seven crashes they both traded through.
- NXPI began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but 14 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was QCOM's 48.0%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than NXPI.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXPI This pageNXP Semiconductors N.V. | — | −4.2% | −38.8% | −52.0% | −27.4% | −4.0% | −35.5% | −39.8% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 7 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 5 of 7 | −2.9% | −48.4% | −37.9% | −24.4% | −7.5% | −22.1% | −17.7% | −2.7% | −64.1% | −90.0% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 4 of 7 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 6 of 7 | −2.6% | −22.6% | −33.6% | −18.1% | −7.2% | −22.7% | −18.6% | −1.2% | −55.0% | −82.0% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 6 of 7 | −2.6% | −21.7% | −29.8% | −19.5% | −9.3% | −18.4% | −21.6% | −1.3% | −61.4% | −85.4% |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 4 of 7 | −5.1% | −39.7% | −27.9% | −21.4% | −9.8% | −18.1% | −32.0% | −5.4% | −72.3% | — |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −4.8% | −43.9% | −48.1% | −37.0% | −41.5% | −22.4% | — | — | — | — |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 5 of 7 | −3.4% | −42.9% | −34.8% | −22.7% | −10.1% | −32.0% | −25.2% | −1.9% | −60.6% | — |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 3 of 7 | −6.4% | −34.0% | −59.6% | −23.7% | −12.2% | −39.2% | −28.5% | 0.0% | −80.0% | — |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 4 of 7 | −5.6% | −41.5% | −32.2% | −26.8% | −6.6% | −30.7% | −19.2% | −0.5% | −48.0% | −84.9% |
| TEL TE Connectivity plc | 5 of 7 | −4.3% | −33.3% | −42.9% | −23.2% | −6.8% | −22.7% | −24.7% | −3.5% | −81.1% | — |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 6 of 7 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| SITM SiTime Corporation | 1 of 3 | −6.1% | −71.0% | −46.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | 4 of 7 | −4.0% | −45.5% | −33.1% | −18.6% | −5.0% | −29.6% | −34.3% | −3.4% | −90.1% | −86.5% |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 5 of 7 | −3.8% | −35.3% | −49.0% | −25.9% | −14.4% | −18.6% | −12.7% | −0.4% | −55.2% | −58.7% |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 4 of 7 | −3.2% | −40.6% | −49.6% | −31.0% | −9.1% | −31.6% | −36.9% | −3.2% | −77.2% | −83.5% |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | 3 of 7 | −6.7% | −68.3% | −40.4% | −28.7% | −5.1% | −34.1% | −13.9% | −1.1% | −64.4% | — |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −3.0% | −50.0% | −43.0% | −32.3% | −5.3% | −38.6% | −37.2% | −3.4% | −66.0% | −95.7% |
| ALGM Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −5.9% | −44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 0 of 2 | −5.1% | −50.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | 0 of 6 | −5.7% | −55.1% | −63.2% | −33.4% | −6.0% | −35.7% | — | — | — | — |
How closely does NXPI move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares NXPI with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 14 of the 17 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than NXPI's 0.73, led by AVGO, TSM and MPWR.
- TSM took just 75% of the S&P 500's losses, against 157% for NXPI, while still keeping 138% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, NXPI captured 115% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 157% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.63. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than NXPI's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXPI This pageNXP Semiconductors N.V. | 115% | 157% | 0.73 | 1.63 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 156% | 107% | 1.46 | 1.31 |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 170% | 132% | 1.29 | 1.44 |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 117% | 92% | 1.26 | 1.20 |
| STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 122% | 104% | 1.17 | 1.72 |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 113% | 108% | 1.04 | 1.18 |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 148% | 157% | 0.94 | 1.93 |
| TEL TE Connectivity plc | 109% | 120% | 0.91 | 1.26 |
| DIOD Diodes Incorporated | 128% | 146% | 0.88 | 1.53 |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 113% | 130% | 0.87 | 1.18 |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 161% | 185% | 0.87 | 1.95 |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 115% | 139% | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 127% | 170% | 0.75 | 1.72 |
| SYNA Synaptics Incorporated | 117% | 188% | 0.62 | 1.64 |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 88% | 149% | 0.59 | 1.31 |
| APTV Aptiv PLC | 106% | 219% | 0.48 | 1.80 |
What diversifies NXPI?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with NXPI's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing NXPI with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in NXPI into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+5.9% for NXPI alone, +13.1% for the mix).
- MCK made money in three of the four calendar years in which NXPI lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of NXPI over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.34 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which NXPI lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% NXPI and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2011 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. (this page) | 1.00 | +31.9% | 0.34 | −8.0% | −29.2% | −37.0% | −26.6% | 41.2% | +5.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.32 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | 33.6% | +9.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.34 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | −16.1% | 33.9% | +10.9% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.28 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +10.4% | −8.7% | — | 33.9% | +8.9% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.36 | +140% | 0.97 | +5.7% | −5.2% | −15.3% | −9.8% | 34.5% | +9.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.05 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | +9.6% | 33.3% | +9.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.08 | +177% | 0.93 | +5.6% | +64.4% | −18.2% | +2.8% | 33.8% | +10.8% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.20 | +111% | 0.89 | +22.8% | +25.5% | −12.6% | +10.2% | 33.9% | +9.6% |
| EFV InternationaliShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 0.46 | +89.0% | 0.88 | +5.3% | −5.2% | −14.7% | −12.4% | 34.5% | +8.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2011 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. (this page) | 1.00 | +31.9% | 0.34 | −8.0% | −29.2% | −37.0% | −26.6% | 41.2% | +5.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | -0.07 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +8.1% | 33.0% | +13.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.42 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −24.4% | 39.3% | +24.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.43 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +17.0% | +0.8% | −17.0% | 37.7% | +20.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.10 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +51.8% | −28.4% | +11.8% | 32.9% | +13.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.04 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +86.6% | −8.2% | — | 33.9% | +15.5% |
Common questions
What was NXPI's worst drawdown?
NXPI's deepest decline since it began trading in 2010 was 60.0%, from April to October 2011. It took 22 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because NXPI launched in August 2010, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash.
What were NXPI's best and worst years?
Over 15 full calendar years, NXPI's best year was 2019, when it returned 75.7%. Its worst was 2018, with a return of -37.1%.
Is there a better investment than NXPI?
Among NXPI's popular alternatives, ADI, TXN and TEL earned more than NXPI with less volatility over the past 5 years. ADI returned 19.5% a year at 34.1% volatility, against 5.7% a year at 42.3%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSFT (software) and CSCO (communications equipment) earned more than NXPI with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 5.7% a year at 42.3%.
Is NXPI more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. NXPI's volatility over the past 5 years was 42.3%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NXPI's return lands within 42.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is NXPI's Sharpe ratio?
NXPI's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.34, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NXPI earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is NXPI with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, NXPI's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.68 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NXPI instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NXPI holding.
What are the best alternatives to NXPI?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, eight outperformed NXPI in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ASML, TSM and ADI.
Did NXPI outperform the S&P 500?
NXPI finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in nine of 15 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +6.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did NXPI do in stock market crashes?
NXPI fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the seven major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when NXPI fell 35.5% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies NXPI?
These had a low correlation with NXPI over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.32), DXJ (correlation 0.34) and EMLP (correlation 0.28); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.07), CLS (correlation 0.42) and FIX (correlation 0.43). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than NXPI's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of NXPI's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to NXPI
ASMLASML Holding
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
ADIAnalog Devices
TXNTexas Instruments
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems
QCOMQUALCOMM
TELTE Connectivity
AVGOBroadcom
MCHPMicrochip Technology
STMSTMicroelectronics