Relative Intelligence · Semiconductors

How Marvell Technology (MRVL) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on MRVL alone. It places MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where MRVL stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: MRVL's full trading record, from June 2000 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowMRVL has run far ahead of the market, rising 62.7% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. That said, it is 24.0% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?MRVL held up far better than its industry: it rose 23.4% over the past 3 months while the semiconductors ETF SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) fell 2.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its semiconductor peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SWKS (Skyworks Solutions) rose 36.0%, while AVGO (Broadcom) fell 11.4%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, MRVL rose 181% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (390% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termMRVL turned $10,000 into $197,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. MRVL's 10-year return of 1,874% puts it ahead of 98% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashMRVL fell harder than the S&P 500 in five of six sell-offs. The Covid crash was the exception: MRVL fell 31.6%, less than the S&P 500's 33.7%. That said, the 2022 bear market took 56.8% off MRVL, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than AVGO (Broadcom, 34.3%) but less than NVDA (NVIDIA, 60.7%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, MRVL has a correlation of 0.53 over 5 years, more closely than 80% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, MRVL's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.68: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.7 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.2 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better optionsAmong MRVL's popular alternatives, AVGO (Broadcom), TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing) and ANET (Arista Networks) earned more than MRVL with less volatility over the past 5 years. AVGO returned 48.3% a year at 44.5% volatility, against 29.5% a year at 65.2%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MU (Micron Technology, semiconductors) and DELL (Dell Technologies, computer hardware) earned more than MRVL with less volatility over the past 5 years. MU returned 68.1% a year at 57.1% volatility, against 29.5% a year at 65.2%. Better options ↓
How much would $10,000 in MRVL have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in MRVL over the past 26 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of MRVL over the same span and MRVL's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in MRVL at the end of September 2000 would have grown to $160,967 by September 2026, more than the $84,332 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of MRVL, and NVDA finished highest, at $7,349,441.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2000 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 406 of the 1,261 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MRVL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$7M+73,394% total · +28.9% a year
- AMZN$1M+12,876% total · +20.6% a year
- TSM$885,827+8,758% total · +18.8% a year
- MSFT$278,783+2,688% total · +13.7% a year
- AMD$254,895+2,449% total · +13.3% a year
- MRVL$160,967+1,510% total · +11.3% a year
- TXN$97,586+876% total · +9.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$84,332+743% total · +8.5% a year
- ADI$79,170+692% total · +8.3% a year
- ON$70,649+606% total · +7.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 158 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MRVL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MU$153,675+1,437% total · +72.7% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- ANET$94,783+848% total · +56.8% a year
- AVGO$79,117+691% total · +51.2% a year
- AMD$59,452+495% total · +42.8% a year
- MRVL$44,627+346% total · +34.9% a year
- MTSI$43,907+339% total · +34.4% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
MRVL at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- MRVL is still 24.0% below its all-time high.
- MRVL's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 91.6%, from September 2000 to April 2001. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 25 full calendar years, MRVL's best was 2009, when it returned 211%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 57.5%. It lost money in 11 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $211B
- Industry
- Semiconductors
- Price history from
- June 2000
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +181%total return
- Past 3 years
- +390%+69.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +264%+29.5% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,874%+34.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +211%2009
- Worst calendar year
- −57.5%2022
- Losing years
- 11 of 25full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 65.2%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.72return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −91.6%Sep 2000 to Apr 2001
- From its all-time high
- −24.0%below the peak
MRVL against the whole market
Where MRVL ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does MRVL rank among all stocks?
This section ranks MRVL on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how MRVL stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- MRVL's 1-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
- MRVL is among the more volatile stocks: its price swings rank in the bottom 17% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | MRVL | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +181% | 46 of 3,287 | top 1% |
| 3-year return | +390% | 155 of 3,017 | top 5% |
| 5-year return | +264% | 207 of 2,893 | top 7% |
| 10-year return | +1,874% | 43 of 2,202 | top 2% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 65.2% | 2,414 of 2,893 | bottom 18% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.72 | 426 of 2,893 | top 15% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −61.9% | 957 of 2,187 | top 44% |
What has beaten MRVL on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). MRVL sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than MRVL with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 150 stocks and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than MRVL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 4% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half MRVL's swings, CLS has the best return for its risk: 101% a year at 59.7% volatility, 8% less than MRVL's 65.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.47 against 0.72 for MRVL.
- Among MRVL's popular alternatives, NVDA, AVGO and ANET are in the region. NVDA earned 58.0% a year against 29.5% a year for MRVL, at 51.9% volatility, 20% less than MRVL's 65.2%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to MRVL; faint dots are 85 more of the 151 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than MRVL?
Investments that beat MRVL over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among MRVL's popular alternatives, AVGO, TSM and ANET earned more than MRVL with less volatility over the past 5 years. AVGO returned 48.3% a year at 44.5% volatility, against 29.5% a year at 65.2%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MU (semiconductors) and DELL (computer hardware) earned more than MRVL with less volatility over the past 5 years. MU returned 68.1% a year at 57.1% volatility, against 29.5% a year at 65.2%.
- Across the whole market, 151 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MRVL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA, TSM and AVGO.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat MRVL over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks MRVL's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than MRVL follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than MRVL's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× MRVL's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than MRVL's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with MRVL?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +29.5% | 65.2% | 0.72 | −61.9% | +1,874% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.53 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against MRVL. 6 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.52 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.67 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.49 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +35.7% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | +7,583% | 0.65 | — | ||
MTSIMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. · Semiconductors | Higher return, lower volatility | +32.1% | 47.3% | 0.83 | −80.8% | +588% | 0.57 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Semiconductors and the categories next to it (Semiconductor Equipment, Computer Hardware, Communications Equipment, Software), plus MRVL's specific themes. 17 of 126 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +5,243% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +37.4% | 49.9% | 0.89 | −56.4% | +2,989% | 0.64 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +2,534% | 0.68 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +51.4% | 67.0% | 0.95 | −84.6% | — | 0.31 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 170 of 3,488 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.13 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.14 | — | ||
KNSAKiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc · Biotechnology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +50.2% | 53.7% | 1.02 | −83.1% | — | 0.14 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +352% | -0.12 | — | ||
XERSXeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +41.0% | 67.1% | 0.84 | −96.2% | — | 0.09 | — | |
EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.02 | 0.59% | |
SOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +28.3% | 38.9% | 0.84 | −46.0% | — | 0.79 | 0.19% | |
What these numbers mean for MRVL
- Annual return
- MRVL returned 29.5% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $36,400. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- MRVL's volatility over the past 5 years was 65.2%, 3.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MRVL's return lands within 65.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- MRVL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.72, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MRVL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- MRVL's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 61.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 61.9% fall takes a 162% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, MRVL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.53 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MRVL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MRVL holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 151 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than MRVL with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with MRVL | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.13 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.41 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.14 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.48 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.01 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.11 | — | |
| 7 | Same or nearby category | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +5,243% | 0.51 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.55 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.36 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.07 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.07 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.03 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.43 | — | |
| 14 | Same or nearby category | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.40 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +31.4% | 42.1% | 0.86 | −51.5% | +616% | 0.49 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +53.4% | 48.6% | 1.13 | −53.3% | +1,195% | 0.21 | — | |
| 17 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.04 | — |
| 18 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.28 | — |
| 19 | KNSAKiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc · Biotechnology | Whole market | +50.2% | 53.7% | 1.02 | −83.1% | — | 0.14 | — |
| 20 | GFIGold Fields Limited · Gold Mining | Whole market | +35.5% | 53.4% | 0.84 | −56.2% | +1,008% | -0.14 | — |
| 21 | NVTnVent Electric plc · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +35.4% | 38.0% | 0.99 | −56.2% | — | 0.48 | — |
| 22 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.17 | — |
| 23 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | 0.11 | — |
| 24 | Popular alternative | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.52 | — | |
| 25 | MLIMueller Industries, Inc. · Metal Fabrication | Whole market | +38.9% | 33.4% | 1.16 | −53.0% | +800% | 0.25 | — |
| 26 | Same or nearby category | +37.4% | 49.9% | 0.89 | −56.4% | +2,989% | 0.64 | — | |
| 27 | Popular alternative | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.67 | — | |
| 28 | Same or nearby category | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.45 | — | |
| 29 | FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +1,194% | -0.05 | — |
| 30 | Same or nearby category | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +2,534% | 0.68 | — | |
| 31 | Same or nearby category | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.64 | — | |
| 32 | IESCIES Holdings, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +58.5% | 58.0% | 1.09 | −54.3% | +2,943% | 0.33 | — |
| 33 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.01 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.06 | — | |
| 35 | JXNJackson Financial Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +41.7% | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | — | 0.04 | — |
| 36 | Popular alternative | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 0.48 | — | |
| 37 | Same or nearby category | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.77 | 0.35% | |
| 38 | SANMSanmina Corporation · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +34.7% | 47.8% | 0.86 | −55.9% | +499% | 0.55 | — |
| 39 | Same or nearby category | +45.2% | 52.6% | 0.97 | −49.5% | +1,600% | 0.45 | — | |
| 40 | SNEXStoneX Group Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +33.0% | 37.3% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +670% | 0.11 | — |
| 41 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.17 | — | |
| 42 | AGXArgan, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +53.5% | 54.1% | 1.06 | −56.7% | +700% | 0.27 | — |
| 43 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.14 | — |
| 44 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +1,050% | -0.13 | — |
| 45 | USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +803% | -0.03 | — |
| 46 | Whole market | +101% | 59.7% | 1.47 | −80.6% | +2,771% | 0.51 | — | |
| 47 | UFPTUFP Technologies, Inc. · Medical - Devices | Whole market | +35.8% | 46.0% | 0.90 | −48.3% | +1,006% | 0.17 | — |
| 48 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.09 | — |
| 49 | ESQEsquire Financial Holdings, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.7% | 31.7% | 1.03 | −56.5% | — | 0.13 | — |
| 50 | CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,021% | 0.21 | — |
| 51 | IGICInternational General Insurance Holdings Ltd. · Insurance - Diversified | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.9% | 1.03 | −50.6% | — | -0.02 | — |
| 52 | ODCOil-Dri Corporation of America · Chemicals - Specialty | Whole market | +35.9% | 36.9% | 1.02 | −48.9% | +460% | 0.12 | — |
| 53 | NWPXNWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +32.5% | 36.2% | 0.96 | −46.5% | +682% | 0.38 | — |
| 54 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.11 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.24 | — | |
| 56 | CLMBClimb Global Solutions, Inc. · Technology Distributors | Whole market | +37.8% | 45.5% | 0.94 | −53.4% | +847% | 0.12 | — |
| 57 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | 0.04 | — | |
| 58 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.10 | — |
| 59 | Whole market | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | 0.03 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | -0.01 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.07 | — | |
| 62 | BELFBBel Fuse Inc. · Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Whole market | +78.0% | 52.1% | 1.37 | −79.8% | +872% | 0.40 | — |
| 63 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | -0.05 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | -0.19 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.10 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | -0.14 | — | |
| 67 | FTITechnipFMC plc · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +54.1% | 41.3% | 1.26 | −85.8% | +178% | 0.03 | — |
| 68 | Whole market | +40.4% | 49.9% | 0.93 | −66.3% | +681% | -0.10 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +32.2% | 42.8% | 0.86 | −85.5% | −3.6% | 0.14 | — | |
| 70 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.13 | — |
| 71 | STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +32.2% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | +1,018% | 0.17 | — |
| 72 | JBLJabil Inc. · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +35.8% | 39.6% | 0.97 | −57.3% | +1,264% | 0.62 | — |
| 73 | Popular alternative | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.49 | — | |
| 74 | FLEXFlex Ltd. · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +36.0% | 48.2% | 0.88 | −70.0% | +534% | 0.61 | — |
| 75 | YPFYPF Sociedad Anónima · Integrated Oil & Gas | Whole market | +60.7% | 54.1% | 1.14 | −90.1% | +173% | 0.09 | — |
| 76 | SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP · Water Utilities | Whole market | +39.1% | 37.1% | 1.08 | −62.0% | +293% | 0.18 | — |
| 77 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.02 | — |
| 78 | KGCKinross Gold Corporation · Gold Mining | Whole market | +32.7% | 45.6% | 0.85 | −67.9% | +572% | -0.14 | — |
| 79 | ROIVRoivant Sciences Ltd. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +42.2% | 58.8% | 0.89 | −79.2% | — | 0.21 | — |
| 80 | STRLSterling Infrastructure, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +78.4% | 60.0% | 1.26 | −59.6% | +5,213% | 0.37 | — |
| 81 | DINOHF Sinclair Corporation · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +31.8% | 38.8% | 0.91 | −77.3% | +649% | 0.04 | — |
| 82 | THCTenet Healthcare Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.9% | 45.1% | 0.86 | −71.7% | +1,058% | 0.04 | — |
| 83 | FTAIFTAI Aviation Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +52.1% | 57.2% | 1.02 | −72.8% | +2,614% | 0.14 | — |
| 84 | Same or nearby category | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.55 | — | |
| 85 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.10 | — |
| 86 | PRPermian Resources Corporation · Exploration & Production | Whole market | +33.1% | 47.1% | 0.85 | −98.9% | +99.2% | -0.12 | — |
| 87 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.25 | — |
| 88 | Same or nearby category | +53.7% | 53.5% | 1.07 | −70.5% | +911% | 0.59 | — | |
| 89 | AGIAlamos Gold Inc. · Gold Mining | Whole market | +32.6% | 42.4% | 0.88 | −66.1% | +294% | -0.15 | — |
| 90 | EMBJEmbraer S.A. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +32.8% | 45.0% | 0.86 | −85.2% | +283% | 0.15 | — |
| 91 | TTMITTM Technologies, Inc. · Electronic Components | Whole market | +48.0% | 54.3% | 0.99 | −57.6% | +707% | 0.59 | — |
| 92 | VISTVista Energy, S.A.B. de C.V. · Exploration & Production | Whole market | +59.1% | 50.7% | 1.17 | −81.2% | — | 0.02 | — |
| 93 | IDCCInterDigital, Inc. · Intellectual Property Licensing | Whole market | +39.0% | 36.9% | 1.08 | −64.9% | +395% | 0.29 | — |
| 94 | MODModine Manufacturing Company · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +65.1% | 61.7% | 1.13 | −88.1% | +1,187% | 0.30 | — |
| 95 | IAGIamgold Corporation · Gold Mining | Whole market | +43.9% | 60.9% | 0.90 | −86.4% | +343% | 0.01 | — |
| 96 | PBFPBF Energy Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +42.9% | 59.1% | 0.90 | −91.5% | +427% | -0.05 | — |
| 97 | Popular alternative | +35.7% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | +7,583% | 0.65 | — | |
| 98 | HMYHarmony Gold Mining Company Limited · Gold Mining | Whole market | +36.0% | 59.3% | 0.82 | −71.1% | +504% | -0.03 | — |
| 99 | Same or nearby category | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.48 | — | |
| 100 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | — | 0.00 | — |
MRVL against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against MRVL, compared period by period and year by year.
How do MRVL's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at MRVL, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Six of the 19 popular alternatives, led by NVDA, ANET and AVGO, were both more rewarding and calmer than MRVL over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, MRVL returned 29.5% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (65.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than MRVL with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | +49.0% | 49.0% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | +35.7% | 57.6% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | +32.0% | 47.3% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| MRVL This pageMarvell Technology, Inc. | +29.5% | 65.2% |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | +28.0% | 55.1% |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | +20.9% | 55.4% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | +19.5% | 34.1% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.8% | 26.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | +12.4% | 55.6% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | +10.7% | 55.9% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | +9.9% | 33.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | +8.2% | 42.8% |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | +8.1% | 48.3% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | +5.7% | 42.3% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | −10.8% | 42.9% |
Has MRVL consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares MRVL with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than MRVL helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 21 popular alternatives outperformed MRVL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was NVDA.
- AVGO, ANET and TSM earned more for the risk they took than MRVL (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- NVDA outperformed MRVL over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so MRVL has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than MRVL over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. (this page) | — | −6.6% | +23.4% | +62.7% | +169% | +181% | +390% | +264% | +1,874% | 65.2% | 0.72 | −61.9% | — | $211B | — |
| NVDA SemiconductorsNVIDIA Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| AMD SemiconductorsAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −13.1% | +6.2% | +94.5% | +139% | +122% | +425% | +359% | +7,583% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | — | $873B | — |
| ANET Computer HardwareArista Networks, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −11.8% | +7.0% | +8.6% | +35.6% | +23.7% | +289% | +634% | +3,439% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | — | $229B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| TSM SemiconductorsTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 1/5 short1/3 long | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| MTSI SemiconductorsMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −5.8% | −2.5% | −6.5% | +50.3% | +87.4% | +249% | +302% | +588% | 47.3% | 0.83 | −80.8% | — | $20B | — |
| CRDO SemiconductorsCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0/5 short1/3 long | −8.4% | −19.1% | −1.7% | +19.8% | +13.1% | +1,100% | — | — | — | — | −62.0% | — | $32B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| MPWR SemiconductorsMonolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −2.1% | −5.9% | −16.0% | +34.0% | +21.9% | +204% | +159% | +1,659% | 55.4% | 0.62 | −51.6% | — | $61B | — |
| ADI SemiconductorsAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +3.7% | +6.9% | +4.8% | +46.3% | +63.3% | +150% | +144% | +652% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | — | $192B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| ON SemiconductorsON Semiconductor Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.4% | −12.8% | −11.6% | +33.4% | +37.8% | −10.9% | +66.0% | +540% | 55.9% | 0.46 | −70.4% | — | $29B | — |
| TXN SemiconductorsTexas Instruments Incorporated | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.6% | −1.7% | +20.1% | +59.1% | +58.7% | +105% | +60.5% | +424% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | — | $254B | — |
| CSCO Communication EquipmentCisco Systems, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.9% | −3.2% | +22.6% | +42.2% | +53.8% | +118% | +118% | +374% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $421B | — |
| SLAB SemiconductorsSilicon Laboratories Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +0.1% | +1.7% | +3.3% | +67.6% | +60.8% | +115% | +47.7% | +277% | 48.3% | 0.39 | −59.0% | — | $7.4B | — |
| NXPI SemiconductorsNXP Semiconductors N.V. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.2% | −10.7% | +8.2% | +8.8% | +10.0% | +34.9% | +31.9% | +159% | 42.3% | 0.34 | −53.3% | — | $60B | — |
| SWKS SemiconductorsSkyworks Solutions, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −8.4% | +36.0% | +37.9% | +28.9% | +10.2% | −2.8% | −43.5% | +29.2% | 42.9% | -0.05 | −72.9% | — | $12B | — |
| SIMO SemiconductorsSilicon Motion Technology Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −20.6% | −15.2% | +54.7% | +130% | +125% | +320% | +243% | +494% | 55.1% | 0.71 | −56.5% | — | $7.2B | — |
| QCOM SemiconductorsQUALCOMM Incorporated | 0/5 short0/3 long | −9.5% | +3.7% | +28.9% | +3.2% | +7.4% | +72.4% | +48.3% | +239% | 42.8% | 0.40 | −44.3% | — | $188B | — |
| INTC SemiconductorsIntel Corp. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −24.7% | −5.5% | +39.6% | +133% | +141% | +167% | +79.8% | +219% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | — | $485B | — |
| ALAB SemiconductorsAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | 0/5 short0/3 long | −16.4% | −7.9% | +62.0% | +58.6% | +82.2% | — | — | — | — | — | −63.7% | — | $49B | — |
How did MRVL do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2001, along with where MRVL ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with MRVL and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- MRVL finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 25 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, ANET came out ahead of MRVL most often, in eight of the 11 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, MRVL finished in the top quarter in nine of 25 years and in the bottom quarter in eight. In 2025, it ranked 21 of 22.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of MRVL; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places MRVL among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of MRVL | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRVL This pageMarvell Technology, Inc. | — | −22.8% | +83.8% | +63.7% | −57.5% | +84.6% | +80.3% | +65.7% | −23.6% | +56.9% | +60.5% | −37.8% | +2.5% | +102% | −46.7% | −25.3% | −10.6% | +211% | −52.3% | −27.1% | −31.6% | +58.1% | +87.1% | +101% | −47.2% | +63.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 25 | 21 of 22 | 6 of 21 | 8 of 21 | 20 of 20 | 5 of 20 | 6 of 20 | 6 of 20 | 15 of 20 | 4 of 20 | 3 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 16 of 19 | 1 of 19 | 17 of 18 | 15 of 18 | 13 of 17 | 2 of 16 | 11 of 16 | 15 of 16 | 15 of 16 | 2 of 15 | 1 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 9 of 14 | 3 of 14 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 25 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 16 of 25 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% | +1.6% | +102% | −82.8% | +308% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 10 of 25 | +77.3% | −18.1% | +128% | −55.0% | +56.9% | +100.0% | +148% | +79.6% | −9.3% | +295% | +7.5% | −31.0% | +61.3% | −55.6% | −34.0% | −15.5% | +348% | −71.2% | −63.1% | −33.5% | +39.0% | +47.8% | +131% | −59.3% | +14.8% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 8 of 11 | +18.6% | +87.7% | +94.1% | −15.6% | +97.9% | +42.9% | −3.5% | −10.5% | +143% | +24.2% | +28.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 10 of 16 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% | +46.1% | +93.4% | +70.0% | +12.0% | +3.0% | +55.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 13 of 25 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +52.9% | −16.1% | −4.3% | +18.9% | +27.1% | −4.2% | +56.7% | −54.8% | +39.5% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 6 of 13 | +31.8% | +39.8% | +47.6% | −19.6% | +42.3% | +107% | +83.3% | −55.4% | −29.7% | +13.2% | +30.7% | +84.1% | +13.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 2 of 3 | +114% | +245% | +46.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 12 of 25 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% | +60.5% | −44.4% | +20.8% | +15.8% | −1.0% | +9.2% | +6.2% | −22.0% | +52.8% |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 13 of 21 | +54.4% | −5.5% | +79.8% | −27.8% | +35.5% | +107% | +54.8% | +4.5% | +38.2% | +30.1% | +30.0% | +44.9% | +55.6% | +54.9% | −8.8% | −31.1% | +90.1% | −41.3% | +93.3% | −25.9% | +61.2% | — | — | — | — |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 11 of 25 | +29.8% | +8.8% | +23.4% | −4.9% | +21.0% | +26.9% | +41.3% | −1.6% | +25.3% | +35.0% | +2.4% | +12.2% | +24.7% | +21.2% | −2.4% | +22.7% | +71.5% | −38.0% | −1.5% | −6.7% | −1.9% | −18.7% | +91.4% | −46.2% | −13.3% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 13 of 25 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% | −16.0% | +178% | +74.6% | −30.5% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 14 of 25 | −14.1% | −24.5% | +33.9% | −8.2% | +108% | +34.3% | +47.7% | −21.1% | +64.1% | +30.2% | −3.3% | +22.9% | +16.9% | −8.7% | −21.9% | +12.0% | +159% | −61.7% | +17.3% | +36.9% | +21.8% | −29.9% | +373% | −33.8% | −60.6% |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 10 of 25 | −4.5% | +13.1% | +6.4% | −9.9% | +17.5% | +31.7% | +39.6% | −7.2% | +46.8% | +36.7% | +5.1% | +25.1% | +46.3% | +7.9% | −8.8% | +27.0% | +72.0% | −52.8% | +17.0% | −9.8% | +30.7% | −15.9% | +96.6% | −46.2% | −40.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 11 of 25 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% | +13.8% | +16.6% | +31.3% | +15.1% | +0.6% | +28.0% | +16.7% | +11.6% | −9.6% | −15.5% | +46.9% | −39.8% | −1.0% | +59.7% | −11.4% | −20.3% | +85.0% | −27.7% | −52.6% |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 14 of 25 | +5.2% | −6.1% | −2.5% | −34.3% | +62.1% | +9.8% | +47.2% | −10.8% | +35.9% | +33.9% | +1.9% | +10.0% | +3.6% | −3.7% | −5.7% | −4.9% | +95.2% | −33.8% | +8.0% | −5.5% | +3.8% | −18.4% | +127% | −43.4% | +134% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 6 of 15 | +6.4% | −8.0% | +48.4% | −29.2% | +44.8% | +26.6% | +75.7% | −37.0% | +19.5% | +16.3% | +10.3% | +66.3% | +74.5% | +71.2% | −26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 9 of 25 | −25.5% | −18.9% | +26.5% | −40.0% | +2.7% | +28.4% | +84.1% | −28.3% | +28.7% | −1.2% | +6.7% | +156% | +40.6% | +25.2% | −43.4% | +102% | +156% | −34.8% | +20.2% | +38.9% | −45.9% | +8.4% | +0.9% | −60.5% | −41.1% |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 10 of 20 | +76.9% | −8.9% | −4.9% | −30.4% | +102% | −1.8% | +51.7% | −33.1% | +27.1% | +37.6% | +35.4% | +72.5% | +4.6% | −30.5% | +381% | +24.5% | +48.8% | −87.1% | +12.1% | +32.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 11 of 25 | +13.8% | +8.3% | +35.1% | −38.6% | +22.3% | +77.1% | +60.8% | −7.6% | +1.1% | +35.1% | −30.6% | +2.3% | +22.4% | +14.9% | +12.3% | +9.0% | +31.1% | −7.6% | +5.5% | −11.3% | +2.5% | +58.3% | +49.1% | −28.0% | −38.5% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 13 of 25 | +84.0% | −59.6% | +94.5% | −46.6% | +6.0% | −14.7% | +30.7% | +4.2% | +30.9% | +8.7% | −2.2% | +44.3% | +30.9% | −12.0% | +19.4% | +6.3% | +43.9% | −43.5% | +34.2% | −17.2% | +8.1% | −26.6% | +107% | −50.3% | +4.9% |
| ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | 1 of 1 | +25.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How MRVL has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were MRVL's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents MRVL's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2000, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of MRVL's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: MRVL fell 48.4% from June to July 2026, while the S&P 500 slipped only 3.4%.
- The slowest recovery came after MRVL fell 86.5% from January 2006 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until May 2020, 12 years later.
Green means MRVL fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | MRVL fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −91.6% | −24.9% | Sep 2000 | Apr 2001 | 7 months | Nov 2005 | 4.6 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −86.5% | −38.1% | Jan 2006 | Nov 2008 | 2.8 years | May 2020 | 11.5 years |
| 2022 bear market | −61.9% | −17.4% | Dec 2021 | Jan 2023 | 13 months | Nov 2024 | 22 months |
| No named crash | −60.8% | −16.9% | Jan 2025 | Apr 2025 | 3 months | Apr 2026 | 12 months |
| No named crash | −48.4% | −3.4% | Jun 2026 | Jul 2026 | 1 month | Not yet | — |
How did MRVL do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far MRVL, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: MRVL began trading on June 27, 2000, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- MRVL fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when MRVL fell 56.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CSCO held up best, falling less than MRVL in eight of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- MRVL began trading after the dot-com bust, but 11 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MSFT's 62.9%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than MRVL.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRVL This pageMarvell Technology, Inc. | — | −12.0% | −56.8% | −31.6% | −26.1% | −7.5% | −37.6% | −23.1% | 0.0% | −74.3% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 2 of 9 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −3.9% | −60.1% | −34.3% | −48.9% | −9.9% | −40.0% | −41.5% | 0.0% | −87.6% | −93.3% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −1.5% | −36.6% | −31.2% | −31.2% | −6.1% | −36.6% | — | — | — | — |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 5 of 8 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 7 of 9 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −4.8% | −43.9% | −48.1% | −37.0% | −41.5% | −22.4% | — | — | — | — |
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 1 of 1 | −10.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 7 of 9 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −5.1% | −39.7% | −27.9% | −21.4% | −9.8% | −18.1% | −32.0% | −5.4% | −72.3% | — |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −2.6% | −22.6% | −33.6% | −18.1% | −7.2% | −22.7% | −18.6% | −1.2% | −55.0% | −82.0% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 3 of 9 | −6.4% | −34.0% | −59.6% | −23.7% | −12.2% | −39.2% | −28.5% | 0.0% | −80.0% | — |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 7 of 9 | −2.6% | −21.7% | −29.8% | −19.5% | −9.3% | −18.4% | −21.6% | −1.3% | −61.4% | −85.4% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 8 of 9 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 5 of 9 | −3.4% | −42.9% | −34.8% | −22.7% | −10.1% | −32.0% | −25.2% | −1.9% | −60.6% | — |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 4 of 7 | −4.2% | −38.8% | −52.0% | −27.4% | −4.0% | −35.5% | −39.8% | — | — | — |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −3.0% | −50.0% | −43.0% | −32.3% | −5.3% | −38.6% | −37.2% | −3.4% | −66.0% | −95.7% |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 3 of 9 | −7.3% | −38.1% | −36.8% | −40.2% | −12.4% | −19.2% | −30.8% | −1.5% | −92.4% | — |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 6 of 9 | −5.6% | −41.5% | −32.2% | −26.8% | −6.6% | −30.7% | −19.2% | −0.5% | −48.0% | −84.9% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 7 of 9 | −1.0% | −54.1% | −33.5% | −13.0% | −6.7% | −19.7% | −16.2% | −0.9% | −55.2% | −82.3% |
How closely does MRVL move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares MRVL with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, MRVL captured 167% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 116% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.68. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- TSM took just 75% of the S&P 500's losses, against 116% for MRVL, while still keeping 138% of its gains.
- Five of the 19 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than MRVL's 1.44, led by ANET, AVGO and TSM.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than MRVL's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRVL This pageMarvell Technology, Inc. | 167% | 116% | 1.44 | 1.68 |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 174% | 91% | 1.92 | 1.40 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 156% | 107% | 1.46 | 1.31 |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 254% | 179% | 1.42 | 2.25 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 117% | 92% | 1.26 | 1.20 |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 126% | 116% | 1.09 | 1.41 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 101% | 96% | 1.06 | 0.97 |
| TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated | 113% | 108% | 1.04 | 1.18 |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 98% | 100% | 0.98 | 1.43 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 148% | 157% | 0.94 | 1.93 |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 161% | 185% | 0.87 | 1.95 |
| SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 113% | 130% | 0.87 | 1.18 |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 115% | 139% | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 115% | 157% | 0.73 | 1.63 |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 88% | 149% | 0.59 | 1.31 |
What diversifies MRVL?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with MRVL's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing MRVL with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in MRVL into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+34.9% for MRVL alone, +36.4% for the mix).
- FIX made money in eight of the 11 calendar years in which MRVL lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and PJUL have moved largely independently of MRVL over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which MRVL lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% MRVL and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +264% | 0.72 | −22.8% | −57.5% | −23.6% | −37.8% | −46.7% | −25.3% | −10.6% | −52.3% | −27.1% | −31.6% | −47.2% | 66.3% | +34.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.00 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 53.0% | +35.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.24 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +19.6% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | 53.7% | +37.2% |
| PJUL Broad MarketInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF | 0.46 | +64.4% | 1.20 | +12.8% | −2.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 53.8% | +33.4% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.16 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 53.5% | +34.8% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.00 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | −3.0% | −0.3% | +9.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 53.1% | +34.3% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.47 | +62.9% | 0.99 | +9.1% | −5.6% | −4.8% | +4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 53.8% | +33.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.36 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | −5.1% | −9.5% | +4.1% | +20.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 53.8% | +34.1% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.23 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +6.6% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +22.6% | — | 52.3% | +36.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +264% | 0.72 | −22.8% | −57.5% | −23.6% | −37.8% | −46.7% | −25.3% | −10.6% | −52.3% | −27.1% | −31.6% | −47.2% | 66.3% | +34.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.13 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +3.8% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −5.8% | −8.3% | 54.0% | +40.0% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.41 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | +15.7% | −17.0% | +8.7% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +38.9% | −9.4% | 57.3% | +48.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.11 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +25.6% | +11.8% | +13.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.2% | −27.2% | 52.7% | +40.2% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.01 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +94.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 53.4% | +42.9% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.17 | +594% | 1.36 | +87.9% | +24.2% | −37.5% | −36.3% | +2.9% | −42.9% | −2.8% | −67.4% | +26.4% | +5.5% | −33.1% | 54.6% | +42.3% |
Common questions
What was MRVL's worst drawdown?
MRVL's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 91.6%, from September 2000 to April 2001. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were MRVL's best and worst years?
Over 25 full calendar years, MRVL's best year was 2009, when it returned 211%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -57.5%.
Is there a better investment than MRVL?
Among MRVL's popular alternatives, AVGO, TSM and ANET earned more than MRVL with less volatility over the past 5 years. AVGO returned 48.3% a year at 44.5% volatility, against 29.5% a year at 65.2%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MU (semiconductors) and DELL (computer hardware) earned more than MRVL with less volatility over the past 5 years. MU returned 68.1% a year at 57.1% volatility, against 29.5% a year at 65.2%.
Is MRVL more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. MRVL's volatility over the past 5 years was 65.2%, 3.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MRVL's return lands within 65.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is MRVL's Sharpe ratio?
MRVL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.72, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MRVL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is MRVL with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, MRVL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.53 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MRVL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MRVL holding.
What are the best alternatives to MRVL?
None of the 21 popular alternatives we compared outperformed MRVL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about MRVL's strength than about its alternatives.
Did MRVL outperform the S&P 500?
MRVL finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 25 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -22.8%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did MRVL do in stock market crashes?
MRVL fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when MRVL fell 56.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies MRVL?
These had a low correlation with MRVL over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.00), DXJ (correlation 0.24) and PJUL (correlation 0.46); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.13), FIX (correlation 0.41) and MCK (correlation -0.11). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than MRVL's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of MRVL's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.