Relative Intelligence · Independent Power Producers

How Vistra (VST) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on VST alone. It places VST (Vistra Corp.) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where VST stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: VST's full trading record, from October 2016 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowVST is 30.6% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. Over the past 6 months, VST fell 5.5% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the independent power producers ETF XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 6.1% over the past 3 months, with NEE (NextEra Energy, down 9.7%) and SO (Southern, down 3.2%), while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. VST rose 6.8% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsVST has gone against the market, falling 22.2% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. By year ↓
- Long termVST turned $10,000 into $129,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. VST's 10-year return of 1,195% puts it ahead of 96% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, VST held up better than its independent power producer peers, including NEE (NextEra Energy), SO and DUK. VST fell less than the S&P 500 in two of the last three sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (22.1% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, VST has a correlation of 0.49 over 5 years, more closely than 72% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- SEI (Solaris Energy Infrastructure, natural gas power theme) was ahead of VST in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (69.4% volatility against 48.6%).
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only three of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than VST with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ATI, INSW (International Seaways) and LPG (Dorian LPG).
How much would $10,000 in VST have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in VST over the past 9 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of VST over the same span and VST's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: VST began trading on October 5, 2016, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or three other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 9 years of VST's record, starting at the end of September 2017.
- $10,000 invested in VST at the end of September 2017 would have grown to $86,899 by September 2026, more than the $34,839 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of VST, and NVDA finished highest, at $519,069.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2017 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 110 of the 2,804 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of VST; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$519,069+5,091% total · +55.1% a year
- STX$389,161+3,792% total · +50.2% a year
- LPG$189,861+1,799% total · +38.7% a year
- PWR$175,322+1,653% total · +37.5% a year
- CCJ$93,092+831% total · +28.1% a year
- VST$86,899+769% total · +27.2% a year
- MSFT$75,717+657% total · +25.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$34,839+248% total · +14.9% a year
- SO$24,273+143% total · +10.4% a year
- AEP$23,136+131% total · +9.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 40 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of VST; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- STX$128,799+1,188% total · +66.7% a year
- ATI$113,890+1,039% total · +62.7% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- SEI$101,108+911% total · +58.8% a year
- LPG$96,257+863% total · +57.3% a year
- VST$88,175+782% total · +54.6% a year
- PWR$56,870+469% total · +41.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- AEP$17,493+74.9% total · +11.8% a year
VST at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: VST began trading on October 5, 2016, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or three other sell-offs.
- VST is still 30.6% below its all-time high.
- VST's deepest decline since it began trading in 2016 was 53.3%, from November 2019 to March 2020. It took 25 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over nine full calendar years, VST's best was 2024, when it returned 262%, and its worst was 2020, when it lost 11.9%. It lost money in one of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $50B
- Industry
- Independent Power Producers
- Price history from
- October 2016
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −22.2%total return
- Past 3 years
- +383%+69.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +748%+53.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,195%+29.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +262%2024
- Worst calendar year
- −11.9%2020
- Losing years
- 1 of 9full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 48.6%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.13return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −53.3%Nov 2019 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −30.6%below the peak
VST against the whole market
Where VST ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does VST rank among all stocks?
This section ranks VST on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how VST stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- VST's 5-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million with 5 years of history.
- VST's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 18% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | VST | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −22.2% | 2,695 of 3,287 | bottom 19% |
| 3-year return | +383% | 162 of 3,017 | top 5% |
| 5-year return | +748% | 35 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| 10-year return | +1,195% | 79 of 2,202 | top 4% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 48.6% | 1,863 of 2,893 | bottom 37% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.13 | 42 of 2,893 | top 1% |
What has beaten VST on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). VST sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than VST with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Three stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than VST over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half VST's swings, ATI has the best return for its risk: 61.8% a year at 42.9% volatility, 12% less than VST's 48.6%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 1.13 for VST.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to VST; faint dots are 1 more of the 3 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than VST?
Investments that beat VST over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, SEI (natural gas power theme) was ahead of VST in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (69.4% volatility against 48.6%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only three of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than VST with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ATI, INSW and LPG.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat VST over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks VST's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than VST follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than VST's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× VST's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than VST's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with VST?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +53.4% | 48.6% | 1.13 | −53.3% | +1,195% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.49 | 0.09% | |||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 1 shownEverything else in Independent Power Producers and the categories next to it (Electric Utilities, Renewable Energy, Electrical Equipment), plus VST's specific themes. 1 of 46 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
SEISolaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · Energy Infrastructure · Natural Gas Power theme | Higher return in most periods | +55.4% | 69.4% | 0.98 | −79.5% | — | 0.19 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 21 of 3,571 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.29 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.34 | — | ||
LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | 0.10 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.25 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +101% | 59.7% | 1.47 | −80.6% | +2,771% | 0.49 | — | ||
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.08 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for VST
- Annual return
- VST returned 53.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $84,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- VST's volatility over the past 5 years was 48.6%, 2.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, VST's return lands within 48.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- VST's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.13, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so VST earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- VST's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 53.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 53.3% fall takes a 114% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, VST's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.49 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against VST instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a VST holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 3 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than VST with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with VST | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.29 | — |
| 2 | LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | 0.10 | — |
| 3 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | 0.05 | — |
VST against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against VST, compared period by period and year by year.
How do VST's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at VST, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 16 popular alternatives earned more than VST over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, VST returned 53.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (48.6% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than VST with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| VST This pageVistra Corp. | +53.4% | 48.6% |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | +39.3% | 37.2% |
| CCJ Cameco Corporation | +24.9% | 49.3% |
| NRG NRG Energy, Inc. | +21.9% | 41.8% |
| ETR Entergy Corporation | +19.2% | 22.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| AEP American Electric Power Company, Inc. | +12.4% | 20.2% |
| SO The Southern Company | +11.3% | 18.8% |
| DUK Duke Energy Corporation | +7.5% | 18.0% |
| WEC WEC Energy Group, Inc. | +7.2% | 19.0% |
| PPL PPL Corporation | +7.1% | 18.9% |
| PEG Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated | +5.8% | 20.6% |
| EIX Edison International | +4.1% | 28.5% |
| PCG PG&E Corporation | +3.2% | 29.3% |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | +1.5% | 26.8% |
| D Dominion Energy, Inc. | +0.5% | 22.7% |
| AES The AES Corporation | −6.0% | 37.3% |
Has VST consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares VST with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than VST helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 19 popular alternatives outperformed VST in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was TLN.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than VST over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| VST Vistra Corp. (this page) | — | +6.8% | −4.7% | −5.5% | −8.6% | −22.2% | +383% | +748% | +1,195% | 48.6% | 1.13 | −53.3% | — | $50B | — |
| TLN Independent Power ProducersTalen Energy Corporation | 4/5 short1/3 long | +16.5% | −3.0% | +0.9% | −11.9% | −14.1% | +572% | — | — | — | — | −36.7% | — | $17B | — |
| PWR Engineering & ConstructionQuanta Services, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −7.2% | −5.8% | −1.5% | +35.6% | +35.3% | +263% | +425% | +2,045% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | — | $90B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| AEP Regulated ElectricAmerican Electric Power Company, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +6.0% | −2.2% | −3.1% | +12.4% | +11.3% | +93.3% | +79.4% | +185% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | — | $69B | — |
| SO Regulated ElectricThe Southern Company | 4/5 short0/3 long | +6.1% | −3.2% | −1.4% | +6.6% | −4.1% | +53.0% | +70.9% | +170% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | — | $104B | — |
| WEC Regulated ElectricWEC Energy Group, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +5.1% | −2.5% | −3.9% | +4.8% | −4.3% | +49.1% | +41.6% | +159% | 19.0% | 0.46 | −32.3% | — | $35B | — |
| DUK Regulated ElectricDuke Energy Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | +3.9% | −2.7% | −3.5% | +6.0% | −2.6% | +56.1% | +43.9% | +132% | 18.0% | 0.50 | −37.4% | — | $95B | — |
| AES Diversified UtilitiesThe AES Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | +0.9% | +2.4% | +5.9% | +4.8% | +9.2% | +25.5% | −26.8% | +81.5% | 37.3% | 0.02 | −63.4% | — | $11B | — |
| PPL Regulated ElectricPPL Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +4.7% | −1.5% | −9.2% | +0.9% | −5.2% | +60.8% | +40.7% | +59.2% | 18.9% | 0.46 | −48.7% | — | $26B | — |
| D Regulated ElectricDominion Energy, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | 0.0% | −9.8% | +3.0% | +9.4% | +6.6% | +80.8% | +2.7% | +32.5% | 22.7% | 0.14 | −52.2% | — | $55B | — |
| ETR Regulated ElectricEntergy Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +3.5% | −5.5% | −6.4% | +14.1% | +11.4% | +149% | +141% | +311% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | — | $50B | — |
| NEE Regulated ElectricNextEra Energy, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −1.0% | −9.7% | −13.0% | −0.4% | −4.3% | +65.9% | +7.5% | +228% | 26.8% | 0.19 | −45.0% | — | $165B | — |
| EIX Regulated ElectricEdison International | 2/5 short0/3 long | +4.6% | −25.6% | −17.6% | −2.0% | +3.6% | +5.2% | +22.0% | +21.5% | 28.5% | 0.29 | −43.9% | — | $22B | — |
| GEV Industrial - MachineryGE Vernova Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.9% | −17.5% | −10.0% | +31.3% | +50.1% | — | — | — | — | — | −38.3% | — | $237B | — |
| CCJ UraniumCameco Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −13.6% | −5.1% | −34.9% | −18.3% | −6.1% | +112% | +203% | +961% | 49.3% | 0.70 | −57.2% | — | $35B | — |
| PEG Regulated ElectricPublic Service Enterprise Group Incorporated | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.2% | −8.1% | −10.7% | −10.2% | −13.6% | +31.9% | +32.3% | +142% | 20.6% | 0.38 | −40.8% | — | $35B | — |
| PCG Regulated ElectricPG&E Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.3% | −24.1% | −23.5% | −18.2% | −19.9% | −16.0% | +16.9% | −77.2% | 29.3% | 0.26 | −94.7% | — | $35B | — |
| CEG Independent Power ProducersConstellation Energy Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.2% | +2.3% | −9.7% | −29.0% | −29.7% | +135% | — | — | — | — | −50.7% | — | $92B | — |
| NRG Independent Power ProducersNRG Energy, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −5.3% | −24.8% | −37.3% | −40.5% | −40.7% | +155% | +169% | +933% | 41.8% | 0.69 | −48.8% | — | $21B | — |
How did VST do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2017, along with where VST ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with VST and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: VST began trading on October 5, 2016, so the table starts with 2017, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or three other sell-offs.
- VST finished ahead of the S&P 500 in four of its nine full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, PWR came out ahead of VST most often, in five of the nine years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, VST finished in the top quarter in four of nine years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of VST; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places VST among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of VST | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VST This pageVistra Corp. | — | +17.7% | +262% | +70.7% | +5.1% | +19.5% | −11.9% | +2.5% | +24.9% | +18.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 9 | 10 of 20 | 1 of 19 | 2 of 18 | 6 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 3 of 17 | 6 of 17 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 9 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% |
| TLN Talen Energy Corporation | 1 of 2 | +86.1% | +215% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 5 of 9 | +33.7% | +46.6% | +51.7% | +24.6% | +59.5% | +77.8% | +35.8% | −22.9% | +12.2% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 4 of 9 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% |
| AEP American Electric Power Company, Inc. | 5 of 9 | +29.4% | +18.2% | −11.0% | +10.4% | +10.7% | −9.0% | +30.5% | +5.4% | +19.9% |
| SO The Southern Company | 3 of 9 | +9.5% | +21.7% | +2.2% | +8.2% | +16.4% | +0.6% | +51.6% | −3.8% | +2.4% |
| WEC WEC Energy Group, Inc. | 2 of 9 | +16.0% | +16.1% | −7.0% | −0.5% | +8.6% | +2.5% | +37.0% | +7.9% | +17.1% |
| DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 2 of 9 | +12.7% | +15.6% | −1.6% | +2.0% | +19.1% | +4.8% | +10.3% | +7.4% | +12.9% |
| AES The AES Corporation | 5 of 9 | +18.3% | −30.4% | −30.9% | +21.7% | +6.0% | +22.2% | +42.1% | +38.9% | −2.7% |
| PPL PPL Corporation | 1 of 9 | +11.4% | +24.0% | −3.8% | +0.4% | +12.8% | −16.9% | +33.4% | −3.0% | −5.2% |
| D Dominion Energy, Inc. | 2 of 9 | +14.0% | +20.4% | −19.2% | −19.1% | +8.1% | −5.3% | +21.5% | −7.6% | +9.9% |
| ETR Entergy Corporation | 2 of 9 | +25.4% | +55.9% | −6.1% | +3.5% | +17.1% | −13.7% | +44.3% | +10.6% | +15.9% |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 4 of 9 | +15.5% | +21.5% | −25.3% | −8.5% | +23.4% | +30.0% | +42.6% | +14.3% | +34.4% |
| EIX Edison International | 1 of 9 | −20.4% | +15.3% | +17.4% | −2.6% | +13.6% | −12.8% | +37.6% | −6.7% | −9.5% |
| GEV GE Vernova Inc. | 1 of 1 | +99.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CCJ Cameco Corporation | 4 of 9 | +78.4% | +19.5% | +90.5% | +4.3% | +63.2% | +51.5% | −21.1% | +23.5% | −9.0% |
| PEG Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated | 3 of 9 | −1.9% | +42.6% | +3.6% | −5.1% | +18.3% | +2.4% | +17.1% | +4.7% | +21.8% |
| PCG PG&E Corporation | 2 of 9 | −19.7% | +12.2% | +10.9% | +33.9% | −2.5% | +14.5% | −54.2% | −47.0% | −24.5% |
| CEG Constellation Energy Corporation | 1 of 3 | +58.8% | +92.7% | +37.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NRG NRG Energy, Inc. | 4 of 9 | +78.9% | +78.5% | +69.4% | −23.5% | +18.5% | −2.1% | +0.7% | +39.6% | +134% |
Risk and diversification
How VST has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were VST's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents VST's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2016, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: VST began trading on October 5, 2016, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or three other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of VST's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: VST fell 38.0% from September 2025 to May 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 10.7%.
- The slowest recovery came after VST fell 53.3% from November 2019 to March 2020; it did not regain that peak until April 2022, two years later.
Green means VST fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | VST fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covid crash | −53.3% | −21.5% | Nov 2019 | Mar 2020 | 4 months | Apr 2022 | 2.1 years |
| No named crash | −48.8% | −16.9% | Jan 2025 | Apr 2025 | 3 months | Jun 2025 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −38.0% | +10.7% | Sep 2025 | May 2026 | 8 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −34.9% | +2.6% | May 2024 | Jul 2024 | 2 months | Sep 2024 | 2 months |
| 2022 bear market | −22.1% | −13.4% | Jun 2022 | Sep 2022 | 3 months | Jul 2023 | 10 months |
How did VST do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far VST, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: VST began trading on October 5, 2016, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or three other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, AEP held up best, falling less than VST in four of the five crashes they both traded through.
- VST began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but 16 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was WEC's 24.4%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
- VST fell further than the S&P 500 in three of the five crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when VST fell 45.7% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than VST.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VST This pageVistra Corp. | — | −7.1% | −22.1% | −45.7% | −17.3% | −8.8% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 5 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 3 of 5 | −4.0% | −21.7% | −40.8% | −22.1% | −7.1% | −35.4% | −21.6% | −1.7% | −69.6% | −97.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 3 of 5 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| AEP American Electric Power Company, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −2.0% | −22.3% | −32.4% | −8.5% | −5.5% | −10.6% | −9.3% | −0.8% | −48.0% | −62.8% |
| SO The Southern Company | 4 of 5 | −1.2% | −23.3% | −38.1% | −9.6% | −1.9% | −9.4% | −5.2% | 0.0% | −30.4% | −19.0% |
| WEC WEC Energy Group, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −1.9% | −23.6% | −32.3% | −9.8% | −4.0% | −9.6% | −12.0% | −0.6% | −24.4% | −21.3% |
| DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 4 of 5 | −1.9% | −24.1% | −37.4% | −7.7% | −2.9% | −13.7% | −8.8% | 0.0% | −38.9% | −63.5% |
| AES The AES Corporation | 1 of 5 | −7.4% | −27.3% | −54.3% | −13.7% | −9.5% | −34.0% | −26.7% | −7.6% | −78.2% | −98.4% |
| PPL PPL Corporation | 3 of 5 | −1.9% | −21.8% | −47.1% | −13.1% | −5.3% | −11.7% | −11.5% | 0.0% | −53.5% | −55.4% |
| D Dominion Energy, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −3.2% | −28.0% | −33.3% | −7.5% | −3.1% | −13.3% | −7.7% | 0.0% | −41.4% | −44.4% |
| ETR Entergy Corporation | 4 of 5 | −3.0% | −21.9% | −41.3% | −8.0% | −4.1% | −13.2% | −13.4% | −1.1% | −49.4% | −28.4% |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −1.7% | −24.0% | −35.6% | −8.2% | −6.9% | −12.9% | −12.8% | 0.0% | −47.9% | −32.2% |
| EIX Edison International | 3 of 5 | −3.0% | −22.0% | −42.7% | −33.1% | −5.7% | −11.3% | −15.2% | 0.0% | −57.7% | −69.5% |
| CCJ Cameco Corporation | 4 of 5 | −3.5% | −34.8% | −40.3% | −14.9% | −7.9% | −26.4% | −38.7% | −0.3% | −76.9% | −47.3% |
| PEG Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated | 4 of 5 | −3.6% | −27.3% | −38.0% | −10.8% | −6.6% | −14.8% | −13.4% | −1.0% | −51.0% | −48.3% |
| PCG PG&E Corporation | 2 of 5 | −3.4% | −24.9% | −59.7% | −63.8% | −7.7% | −12.5% | −8.8% | −0.3% | −36.9% | −78.8% |
| CEG Constellation Energy Corporation | 1 of 1 | −2.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NRG NRG Energy, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −9.0% | −24.0% | −44.2% | −15.1% | −8.4% | −57.3% | −21.6% | −0.5% | −67.6% | — |
How closely does VST move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares VST with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- Over the past 5 years, VST captured 187% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 61% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.37. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only ETR and PWR had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than VST's 3.06, out of 15 popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than VST's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VST This pageVistra Corp. | 187% | 61% | 3.06 | 1.37 |
| ETR Entergy Corporation | 64% | 8% | 8.21 | 0.46 |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 146% | 46% | 3.20 | 1.26 |
| SO The Southern Company | 44% | 21% | 2.07 | 0.31 |
| CCJ Cameco Corporation | 137% | 71% | 1.93 | 1.18 |
| AEP American Electric Power Company, Inc. | 55% | 31% | 1.77 | 0.48 |
| NRG NRG Energy, Inc. | 119% | 92% | 1.30 | 1.17 |
| DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 43% | 36% | 1.21 | 0.36 |
| WEC WEC Energy Group, Inc. | 47% | 47% | 0.98 | 0.45 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 115% | 126% | 0.91 | 1.10 |
| PPL PPL Corporation | 60% | 66% | 0.90 | 0.57 |
| PEG Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated | 48% | 55% | 0.88 | 0.50 |
| EIX Edison International | 43% | 54% | 0.79 | 0.63 |
| NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 63% | 102% | 0.62 | 0.65 |
| D Dominion Energy, Inc. | 53% | 92% | 0.58 | 0.64 |
| AES The AES Corporation | 70% | 153% | 0.46 | 0.98 |
| PCG PG&E Corporation | 17% | -2% | — | 0.28 |
What diversifies VST?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with VST's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing VST with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in VST into MPC would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+54.5% for VST alone, +56.0% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of VST over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- In 2020, the one year VST lost money (-11.9%), GLD returned +24.8%.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which VST lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% VST and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VST Vistra Corp. (this page) | 1.00 | +748% | 1.13 | −11.9% | 43.6% | +54.5% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.28 | +119% | 1.48 | −9.0% | 35.4% | +48.0% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.25 | +225% | 1.34 | +3.9% | 35.6% | +50.4% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.48 | +101% | 1.04 | −13.4% | 36.3% | +47.4% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.27 | +83.3% | 1.00 | −6.5% | 35.7% | +46.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.35 | +323% | 0.97 | +55.5% | 37.9% | +53.1% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.40 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +2.1% | 35.8% | +47.0% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.10 | +126% | 0.96 | +24.8% | 35.4% | +48.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.16 | +177% | 0.93 | −32.7% | 36.1% | +50.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VST Vistra Corp. (this page) | 1.00 | +748% | 1.13 | −11.9% | 43.6% | +54.5% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.13 | +479% | 1.55 | +10.1% | 35.9% | +53.4% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.49 | +3,143% | 1.47 | −2.4% | 41.9% | +67.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.19 | +413% | 1.44 | +27.1% | 36.1% | +52.5% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.14 | +690% | 1.41 | −27.4% | 36.4% | +56.0% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.29 | +1,008% | 1.34 | −18.8% | 38.7% | +59.3% |
Common questions
What was VST's worst drawdown?
VST's deepest decline since it began trading in 2016 was 53.3%, from November 2019 to March 2020. It took 25 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because VST launched in October 2016, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or three other sell-offs.
What were VST's best and worst years?
Over nine full calendar years, VST's best year was 2024, when it returned 262%. Its worst was 2020, with a return of -11.9%.
Is there a better investment than VST?
Looking beyond its popular alternatives, SEI (natural gas power theme) was ahead of VST in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (69.4% volatility against 48.6%). Few investments have done better on both counts: only three of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than VST with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ATI, INSW and LPG.
Is VST more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. VST's volatility over the past 5 years was 48.6%, 2.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, VST's return lands within 48.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is VST's Sharpe ratio?
VST's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.13, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so VST earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is VST with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, VST's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.49 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against VST instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a VST holding.
What are the best alternatives to VST?
None of the 19 popular alternatives we compared outperformed VST in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about VST's strength than about its alternatives.
Did VST outperform the S&P 500?
VST finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of nine full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +17.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did VST do in stock market crashes?
VST fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the five major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when VST fell 45.7% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies VST?
These had a low correlation with VST over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.28), DXJ (correlation 0.25) and EMLP (correlation 0.48); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.13), CLS (correlation 0.49) and MCK (correlation 0.19). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than VST's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of VST's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to VST
PWRQuanta Services
MSFTMicrosoft
AEPAmerican Electric Power
SOSouthern
DUKDuke Energy
DDominion Energy
ETREntergy
NEENextEra Energy
GEVGE Vernova
CEGConstellation Energy