Relative Intelligence · Application Software

How Roper Technologies (ROP) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ROP alone. It places ROP (Roper Technologies, Inc.) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ROP stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ROP's full trading record, from February 1992 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowROP is 32.0% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, VEEV (Veeva Systems) rose 61.4% and FICO (Fair Isaac) fell 36.7%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the application software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0% over the past 3 months, with INTU (Intuit, up 14.6%) and SNPS (Synopsys, up 18.3%), against 3.9% for the S&P 500. Last month cut against the tape: ROP rose 9.3% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, ROP fell 20.5% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (15.6% against 89.3%). ROP finished behind the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termROP turned $10,000 into $24,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, year by year, ROP has outpaced the S&P 500 66% of the time since 1997. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, ROP held up better than INTU (Intuit), SNPS and VEEV; only CDNS (Cadence Design Systems) and PTC fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, ROP has a correlation of 0.50 over 5 years, more closely than 72% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- ITW (Illinois Tool Works) earned more than ROP with less volatility over the past 5 years: 6.7% a year at 21.4% volatility, against a loss of 2.8% a year at 22.7%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- V (Visa, payment processing) earned more for the risk it took than ROP over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 36.4%, against 46.5% for ROP.
- Whole market
- 909 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ROP with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in ROP have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ROP over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ROP over the same span and ROP's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in ROP at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $251,464 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ROP, and TYL finished highest, at $926,134.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 245 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ROP; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- TYL$926,134+9,161% total · +16.9% a year
- AME$869,262+8,593% total · +16.6% a year
- DHR$777,394+7,674% total · +16.2% a year
- INTU$591,451+5,815% total · +15.1% a year
- FICO$470,975+4,610% total · +14.2% a year
- ROP$251,464+2,415% total · +11.8% a year
- SNPS$204,671+1,947% total · +11.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- CDNS$123,432+1,134% total · +9.1% a year
- PTC$25,432+154% total · +3.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,897 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ROP; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CDNS$21,803+118% total · +16.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- APPF$16,654+66.5% total · +10.7% a year
- SNPS$14,527+45.3% total · +7.8% a year
- ITW$14,020+40.2% total · +7.0% a year
- MANH$12,984+29.8% total · +5.4% a year
- PTC$11,712+17.1% total · +3.2% a year
- VEEV$9,905−0.9% total · −0.2% a year
- DHR$8,422−15.8% total · −3.4% a year
- ROP$8,085−19.1% total · −4.2% a year
ROP at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- ROP is still 32.0% below its all-time high.
- ROP's deepest decline since it began trading in 1992 was 59.0%, from June to October 1998. It took eight months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, ROP's best was 1999, when it returned 87.4%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 30.2%. It lost money in eight of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $39B
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Price history from
- February 1992
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −20.5%total return
- Past 3 years
- −15.6%−5.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- −13.3%−2.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +145%+9.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +87.4%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −30.2%2008
- Losing years
- 8 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 22.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- -0.01return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −59.0%Jun 1998 to Oct 1998
- From its all-time high
- −32.0%below the peak
ROP against the whole market
Where ROP ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ROP rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ROP on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ROP stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ROP is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 6% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
- ROP's 3-year return ranks in the bottom 16% of the 3,017 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ROP | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −20.5% | 2,651 of 3,287 | bottom 20% |
| 3-year return | −15.6% | 2,534 of 3,017 | bottom 17% |
| 5-year return | −13.3% | 1,924 of 2,893 | bottom 34% |
| 10-year return | +145% | 1,099 of 2,202 | top 50% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 22.7% | 188 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | -0.01 | 2,373 of 2,893 | bottom 19% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −46.5% | 338 of 2,187 | top 15% |
What has beaten ROP on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ROP sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ROP with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 111 stocks and 798 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ROP over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 25% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half ROP's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 16% less than ROP's 22.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against -0.01 for ROP.
- Among ROP's popular alternatives, ITW is in the region. ITW earned 6.7% a year against a loss of 2.8% a year for ROP, at 21.4% volatility, 6% less than ROP's 22.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ROP; faint dots are 93 more of the 909 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 2 with more than 1.6× ROP's volatility are in the table only
Is there a better investment than ROP?
Investments that beat ROP over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ROP's popular alternatives, ITW earned more than ROP with less volatility over the past 5 years: 6.7% a year at 21.4% volatility, against a loss of 2.8% a year at 22.7%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, V (payment processing) earned more for the risk it took than ROP over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 36.4%, against 46.5% for ROP.
- Across the whole market, 909 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ROP with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ROP over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ROP's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ROP follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ROP's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ROP's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ROP's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ROP?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −2.8% | 22.7% | -0.01 | −46.5% | +145% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.50 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ROP. 12 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +6.7% | 21.4% | 0.41 | −37.9% | +208% | 0.52 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | −3.8% | 29.1% | 0.01 | −43.8% | +232% | 0.28 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +7.2% | 42.3% | 0.39 | −43.0% | +656% | 0.34 | — | ||
PTCPTC Inc. · Application Software | Higher return in most periods | +8.3% | 35.0% | 0.40 | −54.4% | +317% | 0.56 | — | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +1,139% | 0.27 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Application Software and Software and the categories next to it (Enterprise Software, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus ROP's specific themes. 12 of 119 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.60 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.64 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | 0.06 | — | ||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.30 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return in most periods | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 0.60 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,434 of 3,495 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.19 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +145% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.51 | 0.06% | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.50 | 0.08% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.32 | — | ||
DTWDTE Energy Company 5.25 % Debentures 2017-01.12.77 Global · Junior Subordinated Debt | Similar return, lower volatility | −1.9% | 13.2% | -0.08 | −33.9% | — | 0.21 | — | |
What these numbers mean for ROP
- Annual return
- ROP lost 2.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $8,670. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ROP's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.7%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ROP's return lands within 22.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ROP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.01, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ROP earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ROP's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 46.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 46.5% fall takes a 87.0% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ROP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ROP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ROP holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 909 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ROP with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ROP | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.19 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +145% | 0.26 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.51 | 0.06% | |
| 4 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.25 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.50 | 0.08% | |
| 6 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.53 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.34 | — | |
| 8 | IYKiShares U.S. Consumer Staples ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +7.3% | 13.4% | 0.60 | −33.2% | +163% | 0.41 | 0.37% |
| 9 | Whole market | +11.4% | 14.7% | 0.81 | −38.5% | +205% | 0.55 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.31 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.50 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +5.5% | 21.5% | 0.36 | −30.1% | +89.8% | 0.24 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +7.2% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | +68.8% | 0.14 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +4.0% | 20.2% | 0.29 | −29.8% | +93.4% | 0.35 | — | |
| 15 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.14 | — |
| 16 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.50 | 0.08% |
| 17 | COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.7% | 0.70 | −38.7% | — | 0.56 | 0.49% |
| 18 | KMBKimberly-Clark Corporation · Household & Personal Products | Whole market | 0.0% | 21.1% | 0.11 | −34.1% | +29.9% | 0.32 | — |
| 19 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.56 | 0.12% |
| 20 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.03 | 0.40% | |
| 21 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.47 | — | |
| 22 | PDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Broad Commodities | Whole market | +11.7% | 19.3% | 0.67 | −40.7% | +153% | 0.17 | 0.74% |
| 23 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.13 | 0.09% | |
| 24 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.59 | 0.04% | |
| 25 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.39 | 0.45% |
| 26 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.59 | 0.05% |
| 27 | FVFirst Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.7% | 21.1% | 0.55 | −34.0% | +247% | 0.40 | 0.30% |
| 28 | PWVInvesco Large Cap Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.2% | 0.97 | −37.6% | +223% | 0.61 | 0.55% |
| 29 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.51 | — | |
| 30 | FHLCFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +7.3% | 15.4% | 0.53 | −28.8% | +199% | 0.50 | 0.08% |
| 31 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.22 | — | |
| 32 | DSTLDistillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 16.1% | 0.75 | −33.1% | — | 0.66 | 0.39% |
| 33 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.19 | 0.20% |
| 34 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.6% | 0.85 | −41.3% | — | 0.52 | 0.18% |
| 35 | COMTiShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF · Commodities | Whole market | +13.1% | 21.1% | 0.69 | −39.2% | +160% | 0.14 | 0.49% |
| 36 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.40 | — |
| 37 | PPHVanEck Pharmaceutical ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.8% | 0.78 | −29.7% | +153% | 0.38 | 0.36% |
| 38 | FTXHFirst Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.9% | 16.9% | 0.75 | −32.1% | +153% | 0.35 | 0.60% |
| 39 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.38 | 0.50% |
| 40 | QQEWFirst Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF · Technology | Whole market | +6.8% | 21.3% | 0.42 | −32.1% | +267% | 0.46 | 0.55% |
| 41 | Whole market | +6.5% | 20.9% | 0.41 | −34.4% | +156% | 0.17 | — | |
| 42 | IDHQInvesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF · International | Whole market | +10.0% | 17.9% | 0.63 | −33.6% | +183% | 0.40 | 0.29% |
| 43 | DJPiPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return(SM) ETN · Commodities | Whole market | +11.2% | 18.9% | 0.66 | −38.4% | +120% | 0.19 | 0.70% |
| 44 | Whole market | +6.1% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | +270% | 0.57 | — | |
| 45 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.21 | — |
| 46 | WECWEC Energy Group, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.2% | 19.0% | 0.46 | −32.3% | +159% | 0.26 | — |
| 47 | USMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF · US Low-Volatility Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 12.3% | 0.66 | −33.1% | +176% | 0.65 | 0.15% |
| 48 | AEEAmeren Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.9% | 19.4% | 0.49 | −29.1% | +192% | 0.29 | — |
| 49 | AFGDAmerican Financial Group, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Whole market | +0.8% | 15.9% | 0.13 | −27.3% | — | 0.24 | — |
| 50 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.49 | 0.03% | |
| 51 | RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +6.1% | 16.8% | 0.44 | −30.4% | +177% | 0.54 | 0.40% |
| 52 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.49 | 0.03% | |
| 53 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.43 | 0.40% |
| 54 | EBFEnnis, Inc. · Specialty Business Services | Whole market | +11.2% | 21.4% | 0.60 | −35.4% | +163% | 0.16 | — |
| 55 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.23 | — | |
| 56 | MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.54 | 0.46% |
| 57 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.29 | — | |
| 58 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.10 | 0.48% |
| 59 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.37 | 0.40% |
| 60 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.32 | — | |
| 61 | ICVTiShares Convertible Bond ETF · Corporate Bonds | Whole market | +3.8% | 14.1% | 0.34 | −33.2% | +205% | 0.17 | 0.20% |
| 62 | PTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.5% | 11.8% | 0.83 | −26.6% | +188% | 0.30 | 0.60% |
| 63 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.40 | 0.69% |
| 64 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.32 | 0.05% | |
| 65 | AOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +8.6% | 13.1% | 0.69 | −28.4% | +165% | 0.45 | 0.19% |
| 66 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +40.5% | 0.11 | 0.30% |
| 67 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.29 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +11.9% | 19.4% | 0.68 | −54.4% | +30.4% | 0.05 | — | |
| 69 | IHDGWisdomTree International Hedged Quality Dividend Growth Fund · International | Whole market | +7.6% | 14.9% | 0.57 | −29.2% | +163% | 0.49 | 0.58% |
| 70 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.37 | 0.03% | |
| 71 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.36 | 0.60% |
| 72 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.25 | 0.80% |
| 73 | Whole market | +11.7% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | +255% | 0.38 | — | |
| 74 | PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Technology | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.1% | 0.73 | −28.1% | +305% | 0.15 | 0.65% |
| 75 | PBAPembina Pipeline Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +13.8% | 21.5% | 0.71 | −70.9% | +172% | 0.45 | — |
| 76 | Whole market | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +198% | 0.56 | 0.03% | |
| 77 | OUSAALPS Funds O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.4% | 13.4% | 0.74 | −33.1% | +186% | 0.62 | 0.48% |
| 78 | Whole market | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.94 | −6.3% | +32.7% | 0.38 | 0.03% | |
| 79 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.45 | 0.06% | |
| 80 | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | 0.25 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +6.8% | 19.4% | 0.44 | −38.7% | +122% | 0.06 | 0.09% | |
| 82 | Whole market | +5.2% | 17.5% | 0.38 | −36.4% | +102% | 0.12 | 0.06% | |
| 83 | Whole market | +5.2% | 8.9% | 0.61 | −25.4% | +37.8% | 0.27 | — | |
| 84 | FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.48 | −13.5% | +35.9% | 0.16 | 0.15% |
| 85 | Whole market | +2.9% | 17.9% | 0.25 | −36.9% | +181% | 0.42 | — | |
| 86 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.47 | 0.79% |
| 87 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.1% | 0.57 | −39.0% | +211% | 0.56 | 0.20% | |
| 88 | CDCVictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +6.0% | 12.5% | 0.53 | −21.4% | +168% | 0.44 | 0.38% |
| 89 | Whole market | +13.1% | 21.5% | 0.68 | −32.7% | +413% | 0.39 | 0.18% | |
| 90 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.42 | 0.85% |
| 91 | Whole market | +7.5% | 18.0% | 0.50 | −37.4% | +132% | 0.31 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +1.7% | 2.8% | 0.63 | −8.5% | +20.5% | 0.25 | 0.03% | |
| 93 | Whole market | +2.3% | 2.9% | 0.80 | −12.9% | +28.6% | 0.33 | 0.03% | |
| 94 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.48 | 0.26% | |
| 95 | Whole market | +4.4% | 20.9% | 0.31 | −35.8% | +245% | 0.69 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +7.5% | 11.0% | 0.71 | −13.7% | — | 0.62 | 0.35% | |
| 97 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +114% | 0.26 | — | |
| 98 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.32 | 0.25% |
| 99 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.33 | 0.13% |
| 100 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.39 | 0.27% |
ROP against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ROP, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ROP's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ROP, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only AME and ITW were both more rewarding and calmer than ROP over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, ROP returned -2.8% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (22.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ROP with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | +14.8% | 37.2% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | +14.4% | 22.1% |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | +14.3% | 45.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| APPF AppFolio Inc. | +11.3% | 44.2% |
| GWRE Guidewire Software, Inc. | +8.6% | 43.2% |
| PTC PTC Inc. | +8.3% | 35.0% |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | +7.2% | 42.3% |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | +6.7% | 21.4% |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | +6.5% | 40.2% |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | +4.7% | 25.2% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | +1.5% | 22.8% |
| FTV Fortive Corporation | +1.2% | 25.5% |
| VEEV Veeva Systems Inc. | −0.1% | 39.6% |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | −1.4% | 25.9% |
| ROP This pageRoper Technologies, Inc. | −2.8% | 22.7% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | −3.8% | 29.1% |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | −3.8% | 36.4% |
| TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | −5.9% | 33.3% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | −7.5% | 37.1% |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | −9.4% | 39.1% |
Has ROP consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ROP with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ROP helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Eight of the 19 popular alternatives, led by VEEV, MANH and PTC, outperformed ROP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- VEEV, MANH and PTC outperformed ROP in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- AME, CDNS and ITW earned more for the risk they took than ROP (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ROP over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. (this page) | — | +9.3% | +10.0% | +11.2% | −7.7% | −20.5% | −15.6% | −13.3% | +145% | 22.7% | -0.01 | −46.5% | — | $39B | — |
| VEEV QualifiedVeeva Systems Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +22.0% | +61.4% | +88.7% | +45.2% | +11.5% | +59.0% | −0.4% | +715% | 39.6% | 0.19 | −55.7% | — | $52B | — |
| MANH QualifiedManhattan Associates, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +11.2% | +40.7% | +74.0% | +39.2% | +16.4% | +22.3% | +37.1% | +344% | 40.2% | 0.36 | −61.0% | — | $14B | — |
| PTC QualifiedPTC Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +42.9% | +54.9% | +37.4% | +13.7% | −6.1% | +40.4% | +49.3% | +317% | 35.0% | 0.40 | −54.4% | — | $21B | — |
| APPF QualifiedAppFolio Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +6.6% | +24.9% | +41.0% | −2.9% | −6.9% | +25.6% | +70.6% | +1,072% | 44.2% | 0.46 | −55.4% | — | $7.9B | — |
| SNPS QualifiedSynopsys, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +11.4% | +18.3% | −2.9% | −6.8% | −1.3% | −4.3% | +41.9% | +656% | 42.3% | 0.39 | −43.0% | — | $86B | — |
| GWRE QualifiedGuidewire Software, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +22.9% | +23.1% | +28.4% | −2.2% | −27.7% | +110% | +50.8% | +216% | 43.2% | 0.41 | −60.8% | — | $15B | — |
| SSNC QualifiedSS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +8.1% | +25.5% | +22.8% | +2.5% | +8.3% | +81.0% | +26.0% | +200% | 25.2% | 0.31 | −48.9% | — | $20B | — |
| DHR QualifiedDanaher Corporation | 4/5 short2/3 long | +4.0% | +11.6% | +15.0% | −2.2% | +8.3% | +10.8% | −17.6% | +232% | 29.1% | 0.01 | −43.8% | — | $157B | — |
| CDNS Software - ApplicationCadence Design Systems, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +8.5% | −3.0% | +0.4% | +3.1% | −3.0% | +34.0% | +99.8% | +1,139% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | — | $88B | — |
| AME Electrical Equipment & PartsAMETEK, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +2.5% | +5.3% | +4.8% | +18.8% | +32.8% | +78.1% | +96.1% | +481% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | — | $57B | — |
| ITW Industrial - MachineryIllinois Tool Works Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +3.5% | +1.9% | +2.1% | +12.3% | +11.7% | +32.1% | +38.4% | +208% | 21.4% | 0.41 | −37.9% | — | $78B | — |
| HON ConglomeratesHoneywell International Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +3.3% | −5.4% | −10.7% | +5.2% | +6.8% | +27.0% | +7.5% | +160% | 22.8% | 0.18 | −43.0% | — | $68B | — |
| FICO Software - ApplicationFair Isaac Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | −13.5% | −36.7% | −24.8% | −51.3% | −50.6% | −12.3% | +94.8% | +549% | 45.5% | 0.52 | −75.1% | — | $17B | — |
| ADSK Software - ApplicationAutodesk, Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | +12.2% | +12.8% | +0.1% | −14.4% | −20.3% | +21.2% | −17.8% | +245% | 36.4% | 0.07 | −52.0% | — | $51B | — |
| VRSK Software - ServicesVerisk Analytics, Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | +11.0% | −5.2% | +6.8% | −13.0% | −18.1% | −16.8% | −6.7% | +151% | 25.9% | 0.08 | −50.8% | — | $25B | — |
| FTV Hardware, Equipment & PartsFortive Corporation | 2/5 short2/3 long | +5.9% | −4.2% | −4.1% | +5.7% | +18.9% | +11.7% | +6.3% | +98.0% | 25.5% | 0.18 | −52.6% | — | $18B | — |
| INTU Software - ApplicationIntuit Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +10.8% | +14.6% | −16.4% | −46.0% | −48.9% | −32.1% | −38.8% | +237% | 39.1% | -0.06 | −68.2% | — | $90B | — |
| TYL Software - ApplicationTyler Technologies, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +13.4% | +18.6% | +9.0% | −13.5% | −26.1% | +2.6% | −26.3% | +132% | 33.3% | -0.02 | −57.4% | — | $15B | — |
| BSY Software - ApplicationBentley Systems, Incorporated | 3/5 short0/3 long | +19.6% | +18.1% | +8.8% | +0.6% | −25.6% | −22.4% | −32.4% | — | 37.1% | -0.03 | −61.0% | — | $11B | — |
How did ROP do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where ROP ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ROP and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Among its popular alternatives, APPF came out ahead of ROP most often, in eight of the ten years both traded.
- ROP finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 18 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ROP finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 15 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ROP; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ROP among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ROP | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP This pageRoper Technologies, Inc. | — | −13.9% | −4.1% | +26.9% | −11.6% | +14.7% | +22.4% | +33.7% | +3.5% | +42.4% | −2.9% | +22.1% | +13.4% | +24.9% | +29.3% | +14.3% | +46.9% | +21.5% | −30.2% | +25.1% | +27.8% | +30.8% | +24.3% | +35.8% | −25.4% | +51.0% | −11.8% | +87.4% | −27.1% | +45.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 29 | 15 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 13 of 20 | 6 of 20 | 10 of 20 | 14 of 19 | 17 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 7 of 19 | 13 of 18 | 4 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 15 of 16 | 6 of 15 | 6 of 15 | 4 of 14 | 12 of 13 | 5 of 13 | 3 of 13 | 5 of 13 | 1 of 13 | 5 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 10 of 13 | 3 of 13 | 7 of 13 | 2 of 13 | 11 of 12 | 3 of 12 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| VEEV Veeva Systems Inc. | 6 of 12 | +6.2% | +9.2% | +19.3% | −36.8% | −6.2% | +93.5% | +57.5% | +61.6% | +35.8% | +41.1% | +9.2% | −17.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 14 of 27 | −35.9% | +25.5% | +77.4% | −21.9% | +47.8% | +31.9% | +88.2% | −14.5% | −6.6% | −19.9% | +62.5% | +38.6% | +94.6% | +49.1% | +32.5% | +27.1% | +52.1% | −40.1% | −12.4% | +46.9% | −14.2% | −13.6% | +16.7% | −18.8% | −31.6% | +479% | −73.0% | — | — |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 12 of 29 | −5.3% | +5.1% | +45.8% | −0.9% | +1.3% | +59.7% | −9.7% | +36.4% | +31.3% | +33.6% | −5.5% | +3.6% | +57.2% | +23.3% | −18.9% | +37.9% | +29.2% | −29.1% | −0.9% | +18.2% | +3.6% | +49.4% | +56.4% | −67.7% | −41.9% | −50.3% | +66.6% | −31.4% | −7.8% |
| APPF AppFolio Inc. | 8 of 10 | −5.7% | +42.4% | +64.4% | −13.0% | −32.8% | +63.7% | +85.7% | +42.7% | +74.0% | +63.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | 13 of 29 | −3.2% | −5.7% | +61.3% | −13.4% | +42.1% | +86.2% | +65.2% | −1.2% | +44.8% | +29.0% | +4.9% | +7.1% | +27.4% | +17.1% | +1.1% | +20.8% | +20.3% | −28.6% | −3.0% | +33.3% | +2.6% | −42.3% | +46.7% | −21.9% | +24.5% | −28.9% | +23.0% | +51.7% | −22.7% |
| GWRE Guidewire Software, Inc. | 7 of 13 | +19.2% | +54.6% | +74.3% | −44.9% | −11.8% | +17.3% | +36.8% | +8.0% | +50.5% | −18.0% | +18.8% | +3.2% | +65.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 6 of 15 | +16.8% | +25.8% | +19.2% | −35.7% | +13.7% | +19.5% | +37.2% | +12.1% | +42.5% | −15.6% | +17.7% | +32.5% | +91.6% | +27.9% | −11.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 15 of 29 | +0.4% | −0.4% | −1.2% | −19.0% | +48.6% | +45.4% | +49.5% | +11.8% | +20.0% | +73.2% | +9.3% | +11.6% | +38.3% | +19.1% | −0.1% | +25.7% | +33.0% | −35.4% | +21.3% | +30.1% | −2.7% | +25.3% | +39.7% | +9.1% | −11.7% | +41.5% | −11.0% | +72.4% | +35.2% |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +4.0% | +10.3% | +69.5% | −13.8% | +36.6% | +96.7% | +59.5% | +4.0% | +65.8% | +21.2% | +9.7% | +35.3% | +3.8% | +29.9% | +25.9% | +37.9% | +63.7% | −78.5% | −5.0% | +5.9% | +22.5% | −23.2% | +52.5% | −46.2% | −20.3% | +14.6% | −19.3% | +21.4% | +24.1% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +14.7% | +10.0% | +18.8% | −4.3% | +22.3% | +22.2% | +48.3% | −5.9% | +50.0% | −8.6% | +2.5% | +0.5% | +41.0% | +34.6% | +7.9% | +54.8% | +27.6% | −35.1% | +47.9% | +13.0% | +20.0% | +48.9% | +26.4% | +21.4% | +23.7% | +37.7% | −13.6% | −16.8% | +22.4% |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 14 of 29 | −0.4% | −1.0% | +21.6% | −8.5% | +23.6% | +16.4% | +45.6% | −22.1% | +38.9% | +35.0% | +0.1% | +15.0% | +41.4% | +33.6% | −10.0% | +14.4% | +41.4% | −32.7% | +18.0% | +7.1% | −3.7% | +11.7% | +31.1% | −2.9% | +15.2% | −10.6% | +17.6% | −2.6% | +51.9% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 10 of 29 | −6.3% | +10.2% | +0.1% | +5.0% | −0.2% | +23.1% | +36.9% | −7.5% | +35.2% | +14.3% | +4.9% | +10.6% | +45.8% | +18.5% | +3.8% | +37.8% | +21.9% | −45.9% | +37.5% | +23.1% | +6.6% | +7.3% | +41.6% | −28.0% | −27.7% | −17.2% | +31.0% | +15.1% | +16.7% |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 16 of 29 | −15.1% | +71.0% | +94.5% | +38.0% | −15.1% | +36.4% | +100% | +22.1% | +28.5% | +26.7% | +30.4% | +15.2% | +49.8% | +17.5% | +53.8% | +10.1% | +27.0% | −47.4% | −20.7% | −7.8% | +20.7% | +12.2% | +15.3% | +1.8% | +85.6% | −3.6% | +15.0% | +39.0% | −14.7% |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +0.1% | +21.4% | +30.3% | −33.5% | −7.9% | +66.4% | +42.6% | +22.7% | +41.6% | +21.5% | +1.5% | +19.4% | +42.4% | +16.6% | −20.6% | +50.3% | +29.3% | −60.5% | +23.0% | −5.8% | +13.2% | +210% | +73.0% | −22.5% | +39.5% | −19.5% | −20.3% | +16.3% | +33.0% |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 8 of 16 | −18.2% | +16.0% | +36.2% | −22.3% | +10.8% | +39.9% | +37.9% | +13.6% | +18.3% | +5.6% | +20.0% | −2.5% | +28.9% | +27.0% | +17.8% | +12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FTV Fortive Corporation | 2 of 9 | −1.9% | +2.3% | +15.1% | −15.4% | +8.1% | +11.2% | +13.3% | −6.1% | +35.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 15 of 29 | +6.1% | +1.2% | +61.8% | −39.1% | +70.3% | +46.1% | +34.1% | +25.9% | +39.2% | +20.2% | +5.9% | +22.1% | +29.7% | +14.3% | +7.0% | +60.4% | +29.2% | −24.7% | +3.6% | +14.5% | +21.1% | −16.7% | +12.6% | +9.7% | +8.5% | −34.2% | +148% | +75.8% | +30.9% |
| TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | 18 of 29 | −21.3% | +37.9% | +29.7% | −40.1% | +23.2% | +45.5% | +61.5% | +5.0% | +24.0% | −18.1% | +59.3% | +7.2% | +111% | +60.9% | +45.0% | +4.3% | +66.2% | −7.1% | −8.3% | +60.1% | +5.0% | −13.2% | +131% | −8.3% | +169% | −69.3% | −10.3% | +11.5% | +193% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | 2 of 5 | −17.8% | −10.1% | +41.8% | −23.3% | +19.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How ROP has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ROP's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ROP's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1992, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In four of ROP's five worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ROP fell 46.5% from March 2025 to February 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 18.5%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 23 months, after ROP fell 50.0% from October 2007 to November 2008.
Green means ROP fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ROP fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −59.0% | −9.9% | Jun 1998 | Oct 1998 | 4 months | Jun 1999 | 8 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −50.0% | −50.2% | Oct 2007 | Nov 2008 | 13 months | Oct 2010 | 23 months |
| Dot-com bust | −47.8% | −29.6% | Mar 2002 | Mar 2003 | 12 months | Nov 2003 | 8 months |
| No named crash | −46.5% | +18.5% | Mar 2025 | Feb 2026 | 11 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −43.7% | +3.3% | Oct 1993 | Jan 1995 | 15 months | Sep 1995 | 8 months |
How did ROP do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ROP, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, DHR held up best, falling less than ROP in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- ROP fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when ROP fell 24.3% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ROP.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP This pageRoper Technologies, Inc. | — | −1.0% | −25.8% | −34.4% | −19.2% | −9.0% | −18.3% | −24.3% | −0.9% | −50.0% | −46.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| VEEV Veeva Systems Inc. | 1 of 6 | −4.6% | −40.0% | −26.7% | −26.5% | −9.5% | −28.9% | — | — | — | — |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −4.2% | −26.5% | −54.1% | −30.4% | −21.1% | −40.5% | −16.4% | −2.5% | −54.1% | −84.7% |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 2 of 10 | −4.3% | −20.4% | −45.3% | −27.8% | −4.9% | −24.9% | −33.9% | −3.0% | −66.1% | −94.5% |
| APPF AppFolio Inc. | 1 of 6 | −8.7% | −34.2% | −41.3% | −34.0% | −4.5% | −35.1% | — | — | — | — |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −3.7% | −29.3% | −34.3% | −20.3% | −8.4% | −22.8% | −13.7% | −1.9% | −49.1% | −48.0% |
| GWRE Guidewire Software, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −6.4% | −49.9% | −38.0% | −26.5% | −3.5% | −30.4% | — | — | — | — |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 8 | −7.1% | −44.3% | −47.2% | −26.7% | −3.3% | −26.4% | −30.9% | −0.9% | — | — |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 7 of 10 | −3.2% | −22.8% | −25.9% | −13.4% | −9.8% | −14.0% | −21.8% | −0.6% | −45.7% | −33.7% |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −1.8% | −24.3% | −32.1% | −14.1% | −10.4% | −19.3% | −21.4% | −4.6% | −88.2% | −72.3% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −3.7% | −26.4% | −42.0% | −22.1% | −6.7% | −21.9% | −30.3% | −1.2% | −53.3% | −34.9% |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 3 of 10 | −2.9% | −28.0% | −37.9% | −19.3% | −8.4% | −14.0% | −29.0% | −1.1% | −54.9% | −30.8% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 3 of 10 | −1.4% | −22.7% | −42.2% | −22.1% | −6.8% | −14.4% | −25.3% | −1.8% | −62.2% | −65.8% |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 3 of 10 | −2.5% | −34.8% | −50.9% | −25.4% | −7.8% | −16.0% | −32.8% | −0.6% | −75.1% | −45.8% |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −5.1% | −40.9% | −35.5% | −24.2% | −6.9% | −34.7% | −36.9% | −1.6% | −76.9% | −63.6% |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 4 of 8 | −2.6% | −28.4% | −28.5% | −17.4% | −6.6% | −19.1% | −8.0% | −1.0% | — | — |
| FTV Fortive Corporation | 1 of 5 | −4.7% | −27.4% | −45.3% | −26.8% | −8.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 3 of 10 | −6.0% | −42.7% | −36.3% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −24.8% | −18.0% | −3.4% | −38.3% | −66.0% |
| TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −5.2% | −41.7% | −22.5% | −29.3% | −4.6% | −27.1% | −14.5% | −3.5% | −35.9% | −86.0% |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated | 0 of 2 | −4.3% | −39.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does ROP move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ROP with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 14 of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ROP's 0.74, led by CDNS, APPF and VEEV.
- CDNS took just 83% of the S&P 500's losses, against 107% for ROP, while still keeping 132% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, ROP captured 79% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 107% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.91. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ROP's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP This pageRoper Technologies, Inc. | 79% | 107% | 0.74 | 0.91 |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 132% | 83% | 1.58 | 1.09 |
| APPF AppFolio Inc. | 137% | 108% | 1.27 | 0.97 |
| VEEV Veeva Systems Inc. | 113% | 89% | 1.26 | 0.87 |
| SNPS Synopsys, Inc. | 124% | 108% | 1.16 | 1.17 |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 111% | 101% | 1.10 | 1.15 |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 84% | 84% | 1.01 | 0.75 |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 63% | 73% | 0.87 | 0.73 |
| FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 137% | 159% | 0.86 | 1.31 |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 105% | 127% | 0.83 | 1.12 |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 94% | 116% | 0.81 | 1.04 |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 99% | 126% | 0.79 | 1.03 |
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 129% | 166% | 0.78 | 1.44 |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 90% | 118% | 0.77 | 1.00 |
| TYL Tyler Technologies, Inc. | 65% | 87% | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 113% | 153% | 0.74 | 1.32 |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 130% | 179% | 0.73 | 1.34 |
| GWRE Guidewire Software, Inc. | 116% | 166% | 0.70 | 1.15 |
| FTV Fortive Corporation | 88% | 133% | 0.66 | 1.10 |
What diversifies ROP?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ROP's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ROP with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ROP into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-4.2% for ROP alone, +0.7% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and SMH have moved largely independently of ROP over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.37 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- CAH made money in five of the eight calendar years in which ROP lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ROP lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ROP and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2024 | 2022 | 2016 | 2008 | 2002 | 2000 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −13.3% | -0.01 | −13.9% | −4.1% | −11.6% | −2.9% | −30.2% | −25.4% | −11.8% | −27.1% | 23.9% | −4.2% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.37 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +15.9% | +3.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 19.9% | +0.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.10 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +29.8% | +6.0% | +1.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | 19.5% | +2.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.09 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | +39.1% | −33.5% | +35.6% | −44.7% | −47.0% | — | — | 20.9% | +4.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.42 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | +13.4% | −5.1% | +6.3% | — | — | — | — | 20.1% | −0.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.03 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | +26.7% | −0.8% | +8.0% | +4.9% | — | — | — | 19.5% | +0.7% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.33 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | +45.8% | −10.4% | +7.4% | — | — | — | — | 20.8% | +1.1% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.34 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | +5.6% | +64.4% | +28.0% | −39.0% | −14.8% | +24.4% | — | 21.4% | +1.5% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.39 | +99.4% | 0.93 | +45.4% | +7.2% | −3.7% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | −0.1% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2024 | 2022 | 2016 | 2008 | 2002 | 2000 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −13.3% | -0.01 | −13.9% | −4.1% | −11.6% | −2.9% | −30.2% | −25.4% | −11.8% | −27.1% | 23.9% | −4.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.26 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +19.0% | +54.1% | −17.5% | −39.6% | −8.3% | +108% | +51.7% | 21.1% | +3.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.10 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +215% | +1.3% | +7.4% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −2.3% | — | 23.4% | +15.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.09 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +107% | +17.0% | +18.3% | −15.2% | −9.4% | −71.1% | −9.5% | 21.8% | +12.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.30 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +23.7% | +51.8% | −28.3% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +61.2% | +46.9% | 21.2% | +3.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.30 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | −4.0% | +86.6% | +0.7% | — | — | — | — | 21.9% | +5.7% |
Common questions
What was ROP's worst drawdown?
ROP's deepest decline since it began trading in 1992 was 59.0%, from June to October 1998. It took eight months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were ROP's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, ROP's best year was 1999, when it returned 87.4%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -30.2%.
Is there a better investment than ROP?
Among ROP's popular alternatives, ITW earned more than ROP with less volatility over the past 5 years: 6.7% a year at 21.4% volatility, against a loss of 2.8% a year at 22.7%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, V (payment processing) earned more for the risk it took than ROP over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 36.4%, against 46.5% for ROP.
Is ROP more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ROP's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.7%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ROP's return lands within 22.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ROP's Sharpe ratio?
ROP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.01, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ROP earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ROP with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ROP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ROP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ROP holding.
What are the best alternatives to ROP?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, eight outperformed ROP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: VEEV, MANH and PTC.
Did ROP outperform the S&P 500?
ROP finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 18 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -13.8%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ROP do in stock market crashes?
ROP fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when ROP fell 24.3% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
What diversifies ROP?
These had a low correlation with ROP over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.37), DXJ (correlation 0.10) and SMH (correlation 0.09); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.26), CLS (correlation 0.10) and FIX (correlation 0.09). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ROP's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ROP's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to ROP
VEEVVeeva Systems
SNPSSynopsys
DHRDanaher
CDNSCadence Design Systems
AMEAMETEK
ITWIllinois Tool Works
HONHoneywell International
ADSKAutodesk
INTUIntuit