Relative Intelligence · Alternative Asset Management

How Ares Management (ARES) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ARES alone. It places ARES (Ares Management Corporation) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ARES stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ARES's full trading record, from May 2014 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowARES is 37.6% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. Over the past 6 months, ARES fell 0.1% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?ARES fell 3.1% over the past 3 months, 2.2 points behind the alternative asset management ETF PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF), which fell 0.8%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its alternative asset management peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: BLK (BlackRock) rose 7.6%, while BN (Brookfield) fell 11.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsARES has gone against the market, falling 17.4% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (24.9% against 89.3%). A ahead of 94% of stocks worth at least $300 million over 10 years, but behind 64% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 3 years. By year ↓
- Long termARES turned $10,000 into $103,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, over 5 years ARES trailed the index: 71.4% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross four sell-offs, ARES has typically fallen 1.9 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, ARES has a correlation of 0.66 over 5 years, more closely than 97% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- AMG (Affiliated Managers Group), GS (Goldman Sachs Group) and MS (Morgan Stanley) earned more than ARES with less volatility over the past 5 years. AMG returned 18.8% a year at 31.9% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 38.2%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- RY (Royal Bank of Canada, banks) and JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co., banks) earned more than ARES with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 38.2%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 11.4% at 38.2% for ARES.
How much would $10,000 in ARES have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ARES over the past 12 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ARES over the same span and ARES's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: ARES began trading on May 2, 2014, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 12 years of ARES's record, starting at the end of September 2014.
- $10,000 invested in ARES at the end of September 2014 would have grown to $111,482 by September 2026, more than the $47,240 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ARES, and LLY finished highest, at $220,143.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2014 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 121 of the 2,461 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ARES; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LLY$220,143+2,101% total · +29.4% a year
- APH$156,114+1,461% total · +25.7% a year
- AAPL$150,144+1,401% total · +25.3% a year
- IBKR$148,818+1,388% total · +25.2% a year
- MSFT$131,479+1,215% total · +23.9% a year
- ARES$111,482+1,015% total · +22.3% a year
- MS$74,786+648% total · +18.3% a year
- GS$61,856+519% total · +16.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$47,240+372% total · +13.8% a year
- AMG$18,851+88.5% total · +5.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 973 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ARES; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- GS$26,885+169% total · +21.9% a year
- AMG$24,224+142% total · +19.4% a year
- RY$23,646+136% total · +18.8% a year
- JPM$22,905+129% total · +18.0% a year
- MS$22,663+127% total · +17.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- ARES$18,478+84.8% total · +13.1% a year
- ARCC$15,135+51.4% total · +8.6% a year
- BLK$14,247+42.5% total · +7.3% a year
- BEN$13,857+38.6% total · +6.7% a year
ARES at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: ARES began trading on May 2, 2014, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- ARES is still 37.6% below its all-time high.
- ARES's deepest decline since it began trading in 2014 was 49.9%, from January 2025 to March 2026. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over 11 full calendar years, ARES's best was 2019, when it returned 110%, and its worst was 2015, when it lost 20.6%. It lost money in four of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $38B
- Industry
- Asset Management
- Price history from
- May 2014
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −17.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +24.9%+7.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +71.4%+11.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +926%+26.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +110%2019
- Worst calendar year
- −20.6%2015
- Losing years
- 4 of 11full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 38.2%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.48return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −49.9%Jan 2025 to Mar 2026
- From its all-time high
- −37.6%below the peak
ARES against the whole market
Where ARES ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ARES rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ARES on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ARES stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ARES's 10-year return ranks in the top 6% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
- ARES's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 22% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ARES | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −17.4% | 2,574 of 3,287 | bottom 23% |
| 3-year return | +24.9% | 1,942 of 3,017 | bottom 37% |
| 5-year return | +71.4% | 889 of 2,893 | top 31% |
| 10-year return | +926% | 125 of 2,202 | top 6% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 38.2% | 1,345 of 2,893 | top 46% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.48 | 990 of 2,893 | top 34% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −49.9% | 458 of 2,187 | top 21% |
What has beaten ARES on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ARES sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ARES with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 352 stocks and 186 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ARES over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 15% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half ARES's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 35% less than ARES's 38.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.48 for ARES. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than ARES (33.4% against 38.2%).
- Among ARES's popular alternatives, GS, AMG and MS are in the region. GS earned 19.6% a year against 11.4% a year for ARES, at 28.6% volatility, 25% less than ARES's 38.2%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ARES; faint dots are 88 more of the 538 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than ARES?
Investments that beat ARES over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ARES's popular alternatives, AMG, GS and MS earned more than ARES with less volatility over the past 5 years. AMG returned 18.8% a year at 31.9% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 38.2%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RY (banks) and JPM (banks) earned more than ARES with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 38.2%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 11.4% at 38.2% for ARES.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ARES over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ARES's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ARES follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ARES's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ARES's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ARES's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ARES?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +11.4% | 38.2% | 0.48 | −49.9% | +926% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.66 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ARES. 3 of 22 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc. · Asset Management | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +18.8% | 31.9% | 0.70 | −78.5% | +185% | 0.51 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +521% | 0.68 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +627% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Alternative Asset Management and Asset Management and the categories next to it (Business Development Companies, Capital Markets, Banks, Investment Banking & Brokerage), plus ARES's specific themes. 53 of 117 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.54 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.1% | 27.8% | 0.55 | −53.9% | +507% | 0.74 | — | ||
FCNCAFirst Citizens BancShares, Inc. · Regional Banks | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +20.4% | 41.4% | 0.64 | −47.5% | +662% | 0.44 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 992 of 3,494 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.66 | 0.03% | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.22 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.55 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +24.1% | 39.9% | 0.74 | −38.2% | — | 0.16 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for ARES
- Annual return
- ARES returned 11.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $17,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ARES's volatility over the past 5 years was 38.2%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ARES's return lands within 38.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ARES's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.48, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ARES earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ARES's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 49.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 49.9% fall takes a 99.8% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ARES's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.66 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ARES instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ARES holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 538 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ARES with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ARES | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.01 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.29 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.45 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.66 | 0.03% | |
| 5 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.21 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.34 | — | |
| 7 | Same or nearby category | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.41 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.13 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.55 | — | |
| 10 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.22 | 0.48% |
| 11 | Whole market | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.55 | — | |
| 12 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.32 | 0.40% |
| 13 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.01 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.34 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.55 | 0.18% | |
| 16 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.16 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.35 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.07 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.02 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.05 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.16 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.09 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.02 | 0.40% | |
| 24 | Whole market | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +151% | 0.21 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.54 | 0.09% | |
| 26 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.16 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.24 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.11 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.17 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.09 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.19 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.29 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.27 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.50 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.05 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.12 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.27 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.32 | — | |
| 39 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.06 | — |
| 40 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.08 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.03 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.31 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.66 | 0.04% | |
| 44 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.36 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.64 | 0.26% | |
| 46 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.30 | — | |
| 47 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +157% | 0.42 | 0.31% |
| 48 | FNDXSchwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.9% | 0.93 | −37.7% | +291% | 0.63 | 0.25% |
| 49 | Same or nearby category | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.59 | — | |
| 50 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.42 | 0.25% |
| 51 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.45 | 0.13% |
| 52 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.43 | — |
| 53 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.41 | 0.08% |
| 54 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.43 | 0.36% |
| 55 | PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Whole market | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +294% | 0.32 | — |
| 56 | MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +12.6% | 13.4% | 0.95 | −35.4% | +244% | 0.51 | 0.05% |
| 57 | Same or nearby category | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.36 | — | |
| 58 | RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | +215% | -0.10 | — |
| 59 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.26 | — | |
| 60 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.48 | 0.58% |
| 61 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.64 | 0.15% |
| 62 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.47 | 0.35% |
| 63 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.20 | — |
| 64 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.63 | 0.40% |
| 65 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.8% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +340% | 0.35 | — |
| 66 | PNWPinnacle West Capital Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +13.4% | 19.9% | 0.73 | −39.3% | +103% | 0.10 | — |
| 67 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.44 | 0.43% |
| 68 | CACICACI International Inc · Business Services | Whole market | +16.6% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | +499% | 0.33 | — |
| 69 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.62 | 0.12% |
| 70 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.49 | 0.15% |
| 71 | LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +14.1% | 27.5% | 0.62 | −38.9% | +389% | 0.50 | — |
| 72 | AIZAssurant, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −44.6% | +312% | 0.24 | — |
| 73 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.15 | — |
| 74 | WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +15.3% | 28.4% | 0.65 | −44.1% | +539% | 0.35 | — |
| 75 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.26 | — |
| 76 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.11 | — | |
| 77 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.37 | — |
| 78 | Whole market | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +923% | 0.09 | — | |
| 79 | FSSFederal Signal Corporation · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +23.3% | 31.7% | 0.82 | −33.0% | +882% | 0.45 | — |
| 80 | ACAArcosa, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +23.1% | 34.0% | 0.78 | −36.8% | — | 0.50 | — |
| 81 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.04 | — |
| 82 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Same or nearby category | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.29 | — |
| 83 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.10 | — |
| 84 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.42 | 0.95% |
| 85 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.20 | 0.19% |
| 86 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.37 | 0.40% |
| 87 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.62 | 0.12% |
| 88 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.54 | 0.40% |
| 89 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.38 | 0.60% |
| 90 | WTMWhite Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +15.4% | 23.6% | 0.73 | −40.2% | +169% | 0.20 | — |
| 91 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.55 | 0.50% |
| 92 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.42 | — | |
| 93 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.59 | 0.20% |
| 94 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.49 | 0.25% |
| 95 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | 0.20 | 0.98% |
| 96 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · International | Whole market | +17.3% | 22.8% | 0.82 | −40.5% | — | 0.29 | 0.49% |
| 97 | Same or nearby category | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.54 | — | |
| 98 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.59 | 0.45% |
| 99 | WTVWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.0% | 0.83 | −42.2% | +303% | 0.67 | 0.12% |
| 100 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.40 | 0.09% |
ARES against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ARES, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ARES's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ARES, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- GS, AMG and MS were both more rewarding and calmer than ARES over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, ARES returned 11.4% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (38.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ARES with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | +19.6% | 28.6% |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | +18.8% | 31.9% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | +16.0% | 28.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| ARES This pageAres Management Corporation | +11.4% | 38.2% |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | +10.5% | 37.3% |
| ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | +7.2% | 20.1% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | +7.1% | 27.1% |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | +6.9% | 36.4% |
| GCMG GCM Grosvenor Inc. | +6.7% | 27.2% |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | +5.7% | 39.8% |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | +5.6% | 31.7% |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | +3.9% | 31.1% |
| OBDC Blue Owl Capital Corporation | +3.8% | 21.2% |
| STEP StepStone Group Inc. | +2.9% | 42.2% |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | +0.9% | 31.1% |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | +0.4% | 39.8% |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 0.0% | 27.6% |
| HLNE Hamilton Lane Incorporated | −0.8% | 36.9% |
| PAX Patria Investments Ltd | −1.6% | 31.4% |
| CG The Carlyle Group Inc. | −3.9% | 40.1% |
| OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. | −7.3% | 42.2% |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | −8.9% | 30.5% |
| VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | −14.5% | 36.1% |
Has ARES consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ARES with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ARES helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 25 popular alternatives, AMG, outperformed ARES in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- GS earned more for the risk it took than ARES (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ARES over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ARES Ares Management Corporation (this page) | — | −8.2% | −3.1% | −0.1% | −27.7% | −17.4% | +24.9% | +71.4% | +926% | 38.2% | 0.48 | −49.9% | — | $38B | — |
| AMG QualifiedAffiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +6.6% | +6.2% | +29.2% | +34.6% | +59.9% | +214% | +137% | +185% | 31.9% | 0.70 | −78.5% | — | $10B | — |
| MS Financial - Capital MarketsMorgan Stanley | 2/5 short2/3 long | −12.5% | −14.0% | −4.4% | +0.8% | +13.9% | +170% | +110% | +627% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | — | $285B | — |
| GS Financial - Capital MarketsThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −7.8% | −15.7% | −5.2% | −1.8% | +18.2% | +215% | +145% | +521% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | — | $258B | — |
| BLK Asset ManagementBlackRock, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +3.5% | +7.6% | +8.8% | +5.7% | −0.6% | +96.3% | +41.1% | +313% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | — | $175B | — |
| ARCC Asset ManagementAres Capital Corporation | 5/5 short1/3 long | −4.8% | −0.1% | +1.8% | −2.2% | +4.4% | +30.5% | +41.5% | +212% | 20.1% | 0.45 | −56.8% | — | $13B | — |
| BEN Asset ManagementFranklin Resources, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | −6.2% | −2.1% | +14.9% | +35.9% | +44.8% | +62.4% | +31.5% | +49.2% | 31.7% | 0.33 | −62.1% | — | $16B | — |
| GCMG Asset ManagementGCM Grosvenor Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | −5.3% | −0.9% | +17.4% | +14.8% | +13.0% | +82.8% | +38.2% | — | 27.2% | 0.38 | −51.8% | — | $769M | — |
| IVZ Asset ManagementInvesco Ltd. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −8.3% | −2.3% | +17.0% | +9.3% | +30.0% | +158% | +39.8% | +50.9% | 36.4% | 0.37 | −79.8% | — | $13B | — |
| BAM Asset ManagementBrookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −0.6% | −2.1% | −4.5% | −11.4% | −12.5% | +67.9% | — | — | — | — | −30.4% | — | $73B | — |
| AB Asset ManagementAllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −4.1% | −6.1% | −6.3% | −3.5% | −3.7% | +56.6% | −0.1% | +281% | 27.6% | 0.14 | −58.1% | — | $3.2B | — |
| BN Asset ManagementBrookfield Corporation | 3/5 short1/3 long | −1.7% | −11.8% | −19.8% | −19.6% | −16.8% | +85.9% | +20.8% | +226% | 31.1% | 0.28 | −51.4% | — | $83B | — |
| TPG Asset ManagementTPG Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −4.6% | +4.4% | +1.7% | −30.0% | −16.9% | +84.5% | — | — | — | — | −44.9% | — | $17B | — |
| APO Asset ManagementApollo Global Management, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −13.0% | −5.5% | −11.9% | −23.2% | −9.7% | +41.4% | +64.9% | +825% | 37.3% | 0.46 | −53.5% | — | $66B | — |
| APAM Asset ManagementArtisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −10.4% | −12.7% | −8.8% | −14.1% | −16.8% | +26.9% | +4.6% | +200% | 31.1% | 0.18 | −51.1% | — | $2.3B | — |
| STEP Asset ManagementStepStone Group Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −9.5% | +2.4% | −20.1% | −33.4% | −26.9% | +66.0% | +15.2% | — | 42.2% | 0.28 | −60.2% | — | $5.5B | — |
| KKR Asset ManagementKKR & Co. Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −11.5% | −7.8% | −13.8% | −30.4% | −25.2% | +65.7% | +31.8% | +653% | 39.8% | 0.34 | −49.4% | — | $80B | — |
| BX Asset ManagementBlackstone Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −12.7% | −9.8% | −12.8% | −28.3% | −28.4% | +28.6% | +2.1% | +628% | 39.8% | 0.21 | −49.3% | — | $127B | — |
| CG Asset ManagementThe Carlyle Group Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −8.7% | −16.0% | −28.0% | −37.4% | −34.2% | +47.2% | −18.0% | +287% | 40.1% | 0.10 | −56.7% | — | $13B | — |
| BXSL Asset ManagementBlackstone Secured Lending Fund | 5/5 short0/3 long | −2.4% | +3.9% | +1.7% | −2.2% | +3.1% | +23.1% | — | — | — | — | −36.8% | — | $5.5B | — |
| TROW Asset ManagementT. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −2.4% | −11.2% | +6.7% | +1.5% | +3.1% | +22.7% | −37.4% | +126% | 30.5% | -0.16 | −58.2% | — | $22B | — |
| PAX Asset ManagementPatria Investments Ltd | 4/5 short0/3 long | +15.9% | +10.1% | −7.0% | −21.4% | −14.2% | +6.9% | −7.7% | — | 31.4% | 0.11 | −46.1% | — | $2.0B | — |
| VRTS Asset ManagementVirtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −7.5% | −24.8% | −12.8% | −22.6% | −29.3% | −18.9% | −54.4% | +64.8% | 36.1% | -0.26 | −58.7% | — | $795M | — |
| HLNE Asset ManagementHamilton Lane Incorporated | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.3% | −0.4% | −20.5% | −37.5% | −28.5% | +10.6% | −3.9% | — | 36.9% | 0.16 | −62.3% | — | $4.6B | — |
| OBDC Asset ManagementBlue Owl Capital Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −8.7% | −5.9% | −10.6% | −13.3% | −11.7% | +5.1% | +20.2% | — | 21.2% | 0.28 | −56.1% | — | $4.9B | — |
| OWL Asset ManagementBlue Owl Capital Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −8.2% | +0.3% | −3.0% | −36.1% | −40.5% | −13.5% | −31.5% | — | 42.2% | 0.03 | −67.1% | — | $14B | — |
How did ARES do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2015, along with where ARES ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ARES and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: ARES began trading on May 2, 2014, so the table starts with 2015, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- None of the 21 popular alternatives came out ahead of ARES in most of the years they have in common.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ARES finished in the top quarter in five of 11 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 18 of 26.
- ARES finished ahead of the S&P 500 in seven of its 11 full calendar years.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ARES; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ARES among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ARES | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES This pageAres Management Corporation | — | −6.2% | +52.7% | +79.5% | −12.7% | +77.7% | +37.3% | +110% | −5.6% | +11.6% | +56.5% | −20.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 11 | 18 of 26 | 5 of 26 | 4 of 26 | 8 of 24 | 4 of 22 | 6 of 20 | 2 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 14 of 17 | 1 of 17 | 10 of 17 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 11 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 3 of 11 | +55.9% | +22.2% | −4.4% | −3.7% | +61.8% | +20.5% | −11.8% | −52.1% | +41.9% | −9.0% | −24.7% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 4 of 11 | +45.2% | +39.7% | +13.9% | −10.3% | +46.6% | +38.1% | +32.7% | −22.8% | +26.6% | +36.1% | −16.7% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 3 of 11 | +56.6% | +52.0% | +15.9% | −7.9% | +47.6% | +17.4% | +40.5% | −33.5% | +7.4% | +34.9% | −5.8% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 4 of 11 | +6.6% | +29.3% | +17.9% | −20.4% | +29.4% | +47.2% | +31.9% | −21.6% | +38.2% | +14.6% | −2.4% |
| ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 4 of 11 | +1.0% | +19.8% | +20.1% | −3.9% | +36.0% | +0.8% | +31.3% | +8.9% | +4.4% | +28.2% | +0.8% |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 1 of 11 | +24.8% | −27.2% | +16.9% | −17.5% | +39.0% | +1.4% | −9.2% | −23.4% | +11.6% | +9.8% | −32.5% |
| GCMG GCM Grosvenor Inc. | 1 of 6 | −4.3% | +42.8% | +24.8% | −24.0% | −18.9% | +30.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | 3 of 11 | +56.9% | +3.0% | +4.2% | −18.7% | +35.5% | +3.0% | +14.9% | −52.0% | +24.6% | −5.9% | −12.1% |
| BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 1 of 3 | −0.3% | +39.7% | +45.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 4 of 11 | +13.4% | +30.4% | −2.3% | −23.4% | +56.3% | +23.0% | +19.9% | +21.0% | +16.9% | +7.0% | −1.1% |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | 3 of 11 | +20.6% | +44.1% | +29.1% | −35.0% | +48.9% | +8.5% | +52.3% | −10.7% | +34.2% | +8.0% | −4.4% |
| TPG TPG Inc. | 1 of 3 | +5.1% | +50.6% | +62.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 3 of 11 | −11.1% | +79.9% | +49.5% | −9.6% | +53.3% | +8.0% | +107% | −22.0% | +85.4% | +37.3% | −29.3% |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 3 of 11 | +2.8% | +4.9% | +60.3% | −31.3% | +2.8% | +71.0% | +67.1% | −38.2% | +45.2% | −10.1% | −23.1% |
| STEP StepStone Group Inc. | 2 of 5 | +13.6% | +85.9% | +31.7% | −37.9% | +5.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | 5 of 11 | −13.3% | +79.6% | +80.5% | −37.0% | +85.8% | +41.1% | +51.5% | −4.3% | +41.8% | +3.4% | −28.0% |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 5 of 11 | −7.8% | +35.1% | +82.8% | −40.0% | +107% | +19.8% | +96.3% | +0.1% | +27.4% | −1.5% | −5.0% |
| CG The Carlyle Group Inc. | 3 of 11 | +20.2% | +28.1% | +42.6% | −43.8% | +78.5% | +1.6% | +117% | −27.2% | +59.8% | +9.0% | −34.8% |
| BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 0 of 4 | −9.4% | +29.0% | +37.8% | −26.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 3 of 11 | −4.7% | +9.7% | +3.4% | −42.2% | +34.9% | +28.1% | +35.6% | −9.8% | +43.4% | +8.5% | −12.2% |
| PAX Patria Investments Ltd | 2 of 4 | +43.2% | −20.0% | +18.9% | −10.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 1 of 11 | −22.1% | −5.5% | +30.9% | −33.5% | +39.0% | +82.5% | +56.6% | −29.8% | −1.0% | +2.7% | −30.1% |
| HLNE Hamilton Lane Incorporated | 1 of 8 | −7.9% | +32.4% | +81.4% | −37.0% | +34.7% | +33.5% | +64.3% | +6.6% | — | — | — |
| OBDC Blue Owl Capital Corporation | 1 of 6 | −7.9% | +14.8% | +43.4% | −9.6% | +22.0% | −19.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. | 1 of 5 | −32.8% | +61.7% | +47.3% | −26.3% | +32.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How ARES has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ARES's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ARES's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2014, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: ARES began trading on May 2, 2014, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of ARES's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ARES fell 49.9% from January 2025 to March 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 12.0%.
- None of these declines kept ARES below its old high for long; the longest climb back took 11 months.
Green means ARES fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ARES fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −49.9% | +12.0% | Jan 2025 | Mar 2026 | 14 months | Not yet | — |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −45.8% | −8.7% | Jun 2015 | Jan 2016 | 7 months | Dec 2016 | 11 months |
| Covid crash | −44.1% | −33.7% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jul 2020 | 4 months |
| 2022 bear market | −38.0% | −21.2% | Nov 2021 | Jun 2022 | 7 months | Feb 2023 | 8 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −30.1% | −12.3% | Mar 2018 | Dec 2018 | 9 months | Mar 2019 | 3 months |
How did ARES do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ARES, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: ARES began trading on May 2, 2014, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- ARES fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the six crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when ARES fell 43.4% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, BXSL held up best, falling less than ARES in all two crashes they both traded through.
- ARES began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but 12 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was BLK's 60.4%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ARES.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES This pageAres Management Corporation | — | −12.7% | −35.7% | −44.1% | −26.7% | −6.9% | −43.4% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 6 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −12.8% | −32.9% | −49.1% | −38.7% | −9.0% | −44.4% | −31.8% | −4.8% | −85.9% | −46.4% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 3 of 6 | −8.2% | −32.4% | −50.6% | −24.6% | −6.7% | −43.9% | −47.7% | 0.0% | −86.2% | −72.0% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 5 of 6 | −9.7% | −30.5% | −42.8% | −33.3% | −5.3% | −31.2% | −34.3% | 0.0% | −78.8% | −54.7% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −7.2% | −40.8% | −42.3% | −25.2% | −7.1% | −19.9% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −33.0% |
| ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 5 of 6 | −8.1% | −21.8% | −56.3% | −14.4% | −2.5% | −19.1% | −19.9% | −2.7% | −77.3% | — |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −5.5% | −39.2% | −40.4% | −19.0% | −7.1% | −29.3% | −32.1% | −2.5% | −72.5% | −40.3% |
| GCMG GCM Grosvenor Inc. | 2 of 3 | −7.0% | −39.5% | −4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | 2 of 6 | −7.5% | −43.4% | −57.8% | −34.4% | −9.2% | −33.1% | −35.1% | −3.6% | −85.0% | −82.0% |
| BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 1 of 1 | −7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 4 of 6 | −4.1% | −32.5% | −58.1% | −23.3% | −7.5% | −40.9% | −28.1% | 0.0% | −87.5% | −54.7% |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | 4 of 6 | −10.5% | −36.2% | −51.4% | −18.1% | −5.2% | −22.7% | −18.7% | 0.0% | −70.9% | −20.7% |
| TPG TPG Inc. | 0 of 1 | −17.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −17.9% | −35.5% | −48.9% | −35.7% | −10.8% | −40.0% | −44.2% | — | — | — |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 1 of 6 | −6.8% | −39.4% | −49.7% | −38.0% | −10.1% | −46.5% | — | — | — | — |
| STEP StepStone Group Inc. | 0 of 2 | −19.1% | −43.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | 0 of 6 | −12.6% | −41.7% | −45.5% | −33.5% | −10.2% | −51.3% | −37.8% | −2.2% | −90.1% | — |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 3 of 6 | −12.3% | −38.5% | −42.6% | −29.1% | −4.2% | −37.7% | −35.6% | −3.5% | −84.9% | — |
| CG The Carlyle Group Inc. | 0 of 6 | −13.1% | −52.5% | −46.2% | −34.7% | −10.4% | −50.3% | — | — | — | — |
| BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 2 of 2 | −6.1% | −26.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −6.8% | −48.2% | −38.0% | −23.4% | −7.2% | −15.0% | −23.4% | −1.7% | −67.4% | −54.1% |
| PAX Patria Investments Ltd | 2 of 2 | −7.7% | −31.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −13.7% | −49.1% | −58.3% | −41.8% | −7.5% | −38.0% | −36.2% | 0.0% | — | — |
| HLNE Hamilton Lane Incorporated | 2 of 5 | −16.4% | −43.2% | −42.6% | −30.4% | −5.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| OBDC Blue Owl Capital Corporation | 2 of 3 | −9.3% | −28.3% | −48.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. | 0 of 2 | −17.7% | −39.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does ARES move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ARES with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- None of the 16 popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ARES's 1.07.
- Over the past 10 years, ARES captured 157% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 146% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.29. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- GS took just 133% of the S&P 500's losses, against 146% for ARES, while still keeping 136% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ARES's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES This pageAres Management Corporation | 157% | 146% | 1.07 | 1.29 |
| ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 75% | 70% | 1.07 | 0.87 |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 142% | 137% | 1.04 | 1.39 |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 136% | 133% | 1.02 | 1.39 |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 166% | 168% | 0.99 | 1.58 |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 156% | 170% | 0.92 | 1.48 |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 102% | 112% | 0.91 | 1.10 |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | 171% | 191% | 0.89 | 1.62 |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 127% | 157% | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | 125% | 162% | 0.77 | 1.42 |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 103% | 137% | 0.76 | 1.22 |
| CG The Carlyle Group Inc. | 156% | 206% | 0.76 | 1.65 |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 160% | 224% | 0.72 | 1.79 |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 118% | 172% | 0.68 | 1.35 |
| VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 116% | 183% | 0.63 | 1.49 |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 102% | 170% | 0.60 | 1.39 |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | 119% | 201% | 0.59 | 1.46 |
What diversifies ARES?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ARES's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ARES with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ARES into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+13.1% for ARES alone, +15.6% for the mix).
- FIX made money in four of the four calendar years in which ARES lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ARES over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.42 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ARES lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ARES and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES Ares Management Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +71.4% | 0.48 | −6.2% | −12.7% | −5.6% | −20.6% | 36.3% | +13.1% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.32 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | 29.7% | +14.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.22 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | 29.7% | +17.0% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.42 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | 30.4% | +14.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.34 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | 32.0% | +19.1% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.47 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | −5.1% | −9.5% | +4.1% | 30.1% | +14.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.02 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | 29.3% | +15.6% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.45 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | 31.1% | +15.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.37 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | 31.3% | +16.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES Ares Management Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +71.4% | 0.48 | −6.2% | −12.7% | −5.6% | −20.6% | 36.3% | +13.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.11 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | 30.1% | +19.4% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.32 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | 34.6% | +31.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.28 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | 32.7% | +27.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.07 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | 29.8% | +18.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.26 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | 31.3% | +21.1% |
Common questions
What was ARES's worst drawdown?
ARES's deepest decline since it began trading in 2014 was 49.9%, from January 2025 to March 2026. It has not yet climbed back to that peak. Because ARES launched in May 2014, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were ARES's best and worst years?
Over 11 full calendar years, ARES's best year was 2019, when it returned 110%. Its worst was 2015, with a return of -20.6%.
Is there a better investment than ARES?
Among ARES's popular alternatives, AMG, GS and MS earned more than ARES with less volatility over the past 5 years. AMG returned 18.8% a year at 31.9% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 38.2%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RY (banks) and JPM (banks) earned more than ARES with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 38.2%.
Is ARES more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ARES's volatility over the past 5 years was 38.2%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ARES's return lands within 38.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ARES's Sharpe ratio?
ARES's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.48, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ARES earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ARES with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ARES's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.66 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ARES instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ARES holding.
What are the best alternatives to ARES?
Of the 25 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed ARES in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: AMG.
Did ARES outperform the S&P 500?
ARES finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of 11 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -6.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ARES do in stock market crashes?
ARES fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the six major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when ARES fell 43.4% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies ARES?
These had a low correlation with ARES over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.32), DXJ (correlation 0.22) and EMLP (correlation 0.42); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.11), CLS (correlation 0.32) and FIX (correlation 0.28). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ARES's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ARES's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to ARES
MSMorgan Stanley
GSGoldman Sachs Group
BLKBlackRock
BAMBrookfield Asset Management
BNBrookfield
APOApollo Global Management
KKRKKR & Co. Inc.
BXBlackstone