Relative Intelligence · Software

How Snowflake (SNOW) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SNOW alone. It places SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) against 18 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SNOW stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: SNOW's full trading record, from September 2020 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowSNOW has run far ahead of the market, rising 112% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Even so, it is 20.5% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?SNOW's 16.5% gain over the past 3 months is part of a broader software rally: the software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0%, with MSFT (Microsoft, up 32.5%) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies, up 42.8%). Its software peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SAP rose 44.6%, while GOOG (Alphabet) fell 4.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsA behind 61% of stocks worth at least $300 million over 5 years, but ahead of 74% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 3 years. Over the past year, SNOW rose 30.1% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (116% against 89.3%). Market rank ↓
- Long termSNOW turned $10,000 into $9,570 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, SNOW fell 64.1%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500, and more than software peers such as GOOG (Alphabet, 35.0%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, SNOW has a correlation of 0.35 over 5 years, less closely than 61% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- NVDA (NVIDIA), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft) earned more than SNOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. NVDA returned 58.0% a year at 51.9% volatility, against a loss of 0.9% a year at 62.6%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- AVGO (Broadcom, semiconductors) and MU (Micron Technology, semiconductors) earned more than SNOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. AVGO returned 48.3% a year at 44.5% volatility, against a loss of 0.9% a year at 62.6%.
- Whole market
- 2,336 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SNOW with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA (NVIDIA), AAPL (Apple) and GOOG (Alphabet).
How much would $10,000 in SNOW have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SNOW over the past 6 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SNOW over the same span and SNOW's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: SNOW began trading on September 16, 2020, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 6 years of SNOW's record, starting at the end of September 2020.
- $10,000 invested in SNOW at the end of September 2020 would have grown to $13,529 by September 2026, less than the $24,691 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- All eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SNOW, and PLTR finished highest, at $196,893.
From the end of September 2020 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,273 of the 3,321 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SNOW; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- PLTR$196,893+1,869% total · +64.3% a year
- NVDA$169,929+1,599% total · +60.3% a year
- ANET$157,457+1,475% total · +58.3% a year
- NET$84,579+746% total · +42.7% a year
- AMD$74,614+646% total · +39.8% a year
- GOOG$46,810+368% total · +29.3% a year
- DDOG$26,805+168% total · +17.9% a year
- MSFT$25,643+156% total · +17.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$24,691+147% total · +16.3% a year
- SNOW$13,529+35.3% total · +5.2% a year
SNOW at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: SNOW began trading on September 16, 2020, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- SNOW's deepest decline since it began trading in 2020 was 73.0%, from November 2021 to September 2024. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- SNOW is still 20.5% below its all-time high.
- Over five full calendar years, SNOW's best was 2025, when it returned 42.1%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 57.6%. It lost money in two of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $113B
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Price history from
- September 2020
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +30.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +116%+29.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- −4.3%−0.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +42.1%2025
- Worst calendar year
- −57.6%2022
- Losing years
- 2 of 5full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 62.6%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.29return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −73.0%Nov 2021 to Sep 2024
- From its all-time high
- −20.5%below the peak
SNOW against the whole market
Where SNOW ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does SNOW rank among all stocks?
This section ranks SNOW on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how SNOW stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- SNOW is among the more volatile stocks: its price swings rank in the bottom 19% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | SNOW | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.1% | 975 of 3,287 | top 30% |
| 3-year return | +116% | 796 of 3,017 | top 26% |
| 5-year return | −4.3% | 1,778 of 2,893 | bottom 40% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 62.6% | 2,356 of 2,893 | bottom 20% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.29 | 1,585 of 2,893 | bottom 46% |
What has beaten SNOW on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). SNOW sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than SNOW with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,438 stocks and 898 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SNOW over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 64% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half SNOW's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, 25% less than SNOW's 62.6%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.46 against 0.29 for SNOW. BELFB earned the most, 78.0% a year, while still swinging less than SNOW (52.1% against 62.6%).
- Among SNOW's popular alternatives, NVDA, ANET and AMD are in the region. NVDA earned 58.0% a year against a loss of 0.9% a year for SNOW, at 51.9% volatility, 17% less than SNOW's 62.6%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to SNOW; faint dots are 93 more of the 2,336 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than SNOW?
Investments that beat SNOW over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among SNOW's popular alternatives, NVDA, GOOG and MSFT earned more than SNOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. NVDA returned 58.0% a year at 51.9% volatility, against a loss of 0.9% a year at 62.6%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AVGO (semiconductors) and MU (semiconductors) earned more than SNOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. AVGO returned 48.3% a year at 44.5% volatility, against a loss of 0.9% a year at 62.6%.
- Across the whole market, 2,336 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SNOW with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA, AAPL and GOOG.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat SNOW over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks SNOW's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than SNOW follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than SNOW's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× SNOW's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than SNOW's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with SNOW?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −0.9% | 62.6% | 0.29 | −73.0% | −4.3% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.35 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against SNOW. 13 of 18 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +884% | 0.18 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +138% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +80.3% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +35.7% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | +359% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +634% | 0.07 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +51.4% | 67.0% | 0.95 | −84.6% | +695% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Software and the categories next to it (Application Software, Enterprise Software, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus SNOW's specific themes. 73 of 123 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +29.5% | 65.2% | 0.72 | −61.9% | +264% | 0.20 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +617% | 0.13 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +1,244% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +293% | 0.08 | — | ||
ONTOOnto Innovation Inc. · Semiconductor Equipment | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +24.6% | 59.6% | 0.67 | −62.8% | +200% | -0.16 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | −0.1% | 39.6% | 0.19 | −55.7% | −0.4% | 0.38 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,499 of 3,492 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +800% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +413% | 0.08 | — | ||
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | +839% | -0.16 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +301% | 0.04 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | +20.3% | 0.12 | 0.09% | ||
JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | +28.0% | 0.21 | 0.20% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +57.3% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −66.9% | +863% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | 0.0% | 24.7% | 0.12 | −38.0% | −0.2% | 0.16 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for SNOW
- Annual return
- SNOW lost 0.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $9,570. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- SNOW's volatility over the past 5 years was 62.6%, 3.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SNOW's return lands within 62.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- SNOW's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.29, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SNOW earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- SNOW's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 73.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 73.0% fall takes a 270% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, SNOW's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.35 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SNOW instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SNOW holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2,336 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than SNOW with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with SNOW | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +800% | 0.50 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +413% | 0.08 | — | |
| 3 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | +839% | -0.16 | — |
| 4 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +301% | 0.04 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +319% | 0.03 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +181% | -0.20 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +315% | 0.45 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +159% | 0.63 | — | |
| 9 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +461% | -0.14 | — |
| 10 | FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +726% | -0.10 | — |
| 11 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +226% | -0.06 | — |
| 12 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +690% | 0.01 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +705% | -0.15 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | +20.3% | 0.12 | 0.09% | |
| 15 | HASHasbro, Inc. · Toys & Games | Whole market | +8.0% | 33.3% | 0.40 | −63.8% | +47.2% | -0.01 | — |
| 16 | TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +50.5% | 45.1% | 1.14 | −63.4% | +673% | -0.16 | — |
| 17 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +413% | -0.07 | — |
| 18 | LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +783% | -0.07 | — |
| 19 | SXTSensient Technologies Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +9.3% | 30.3% | 0.44 | −50.6% | +56.2% | 0.07 | — |
| 20 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | +28.0% | 0.21 | 0.20% |
| 21 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.15 | — | |
| 22 | EROEro Copper Corp. · Copper | Whole market | +9.8% | 56.0% | 0.45 | −67.2% | +59.8% | 0.10 | — |
| 23 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.25 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +133% | 0.34 | — | |
| 25 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +146% | -0.04 | 0.61% |
| 26 | Whole market | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +1,636% | 0.11 | — | |
| 27 | KRTKarat Packaging Inc. · Packaging & Containers | Whole market | +25.4% | 44.1% | 0.74 | −48.4% | +210% | 0.18 | — |
| 28 | NPKNational Presto Industries, Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 27.3% | 0.69 | −45.5% | +113% | 0.00 | — |
| 29 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.04 | — | |
| 30 | RCBCRiver City Bank · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.6% | 27.2% | 0.64 | −45.5% | +97.5% | 0.20 | — |
| 31 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +72.6% | 0.37 | 0.03% | |
| 32 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +667% | -0.16 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +82.3% | 0.34 | 0.03% | |
| 34 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +524% | -0.06 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +158% | -0.11 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +87.8% | -0.03 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +232% | -0.26 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +122% | 0.16 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +218% | -0.15 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +318% | -0.21 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | 0.04 | — | |
| 42 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +25.6% | 0.17 | 0.30% |
| 43 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +82.1% | -0.13 | — | |
| 44 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | 0.11 | 0.48% |
| 45 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | -0.05 | 0.40% |
| 46 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +98.2% | -0.06 | — | |
| 47 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | +35.7% | 0.30 | 0.69% |
| 48 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +144% | -0.08 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +288% | 0.01 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +123% | 0.17 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +48.6% | 0.16 | 0.05% | |
| 52 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +97.2% | 0.41 | 0.18% | |
| 53 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +319% | 0.10 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +159% | -0.01 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +118% | 0.48 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +159% | -0.24 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +113% | -0.04 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +121% | -0.11 | — | |
| 59 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +33.9% | 0.26 | 0.60% |
| 60 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +329% | 0.21 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +76.6% | 0.16 | 0.03% | |
| 62 | Whole market | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +866% | 0.20 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +217% | -0.11 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +29.3% | 57.6% | 0.74 | −77.7% | +261% | 0.39 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +32.2% | 42.8% | 0.86 | −85.5% | +303% | -0.17 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +135% | 0.05 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +145% | -0.18 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +180% | 0.01 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +145% | 0.36 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +37.3% | 55.0% | 0.85 | −69.4% | +388% | 0.31 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +55.9% | 0.17 | 0.03% | |
| 72 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +110% | 0.31 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +109% | 0.19 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +355% | 0.35 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +326% | 0.20 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +147% | -0.01 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +129% | -0.30 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +126% | -0.10 | 0.40% | |
| 79 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +72.6% | -0.09 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +133% | 0.48 | 0.09% | |
| 81 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +314% | 0.03 | — |
| 82 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +210% | 0.14 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +13.1% | 29.5% | 0.57 | −64.5% | +85.0% | 0.23 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +327% | 0.07 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +235% | 0.14 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +115% | 0.05 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | +102% | 0.15 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +136% | 0.01 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +13.5% | 29.3% | 0.58 | −49.6% | +88.5% | 0.27 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +162% | -0.14 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +107% | -0.14 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +425% | 0.11 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +177% | -0.02 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +126% | -0.24 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +8.7% | 35.7% | 0.41 | −28.7% | +52.1% | -0.09 | — | |
| 96 | DINOHF Sinclair Corporation · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +31.8% | 38.8% | 0.91 | −77.3% | +298% | 0.07 | — |
| 97 | Whole market | +20.4% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | +153% | 0.09 | — | |
| 98 | FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.48 | −13.5% | +24.5% | 0.12 | 0.15% |
| 99 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +179% | 0.24 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +31.4% | 42.1% | 0.86 | −51.5% | +292% | 0.00 | — |
SNOW against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against SNOW, compared period by period and year by year.
How do SNOW's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at SNOW, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- 12 of the 18 popular alternatives, led by NVDA, ANET and AMD, were both more rewarding and calmer than SNOW over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, SNOW returned -0.9% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (62.6% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than SNOW with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | +51.4% | 67.0% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | +49.0% | 49.0% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | +35.7% | 57.6% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | +16.6% | 30.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| SAP SAP SE | +11.5% | 30.0% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | +10.7% | 69.1% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | +10.1% | 59.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| DBX Dropbox, Inc. | +3.9% | 34.4% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | +1.9% | 45.5% |
| SNOW This pageSnowflake Inc. | −0.9% | 62.6% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | −3.2% | 39.4% |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | −3.6% | 41.6% |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | −6.2% | 71.1% |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | −10.7% | 60.4% |
Has SNOW consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares SNOW with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than SNOW helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 18 popular alternatives, DDOG, outperformed SNOW in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- NVDA, ANET and AMD earned more for the risk they took than SNOW (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- NVDA outperformed SNOW over all two long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so SNOW has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than SNOW over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. (this page) | — | −5.8% | +16.5% | +112% | +47.5% | +30.1% | +116% | −4.3% | 62.6% | 0.29 | −73.0% | — | $113B | — |
| DDOG QualifiedDatadog, Inc. | 3/5 short2/2 long | +4.6% | −2.6% | +97.6% | +91.7% | +64.1% | +198% | +61.4% | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | $92B | — |
| PLTR Software - InfrastructurePalantir Technologies Inc. | 2/5 short2/2 long | +5.2% | +42.8% | +32.0% | +14.7% | +6.1% | +1,096% | +695% | 67.0% | 0.95 | −84.6% | — | $443B | — |
| AMD SemiconductorsAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 2/5 short2/2 long | −13.1% | +6.2% | +94.5% | +139% | +122% | +425% | +359% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | — | $873B | — |
| GOOG Internet Content & InformationAlphabet Inc. | 2/5 short2/2 long | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| NVDA SemiconductorsNVIDIA Corporation | 1/5 short2/2 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| NET Software - InfrastructureCloudflare, Inc. | 1/5 short2/2 long | −17.1% | +7.0% | +42.3% | +48.7% | +36.8% | +391% | +66.1% | 69.1% | 0.49 | −82.6% | — | $104B | — |
| ANET Computer HardwareArista Networks, Inc. | 0/5 short2/2 long | −11.8% | +7.0% | +8.6% | +35.6% | +23.7% | +289% | +634% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | — | $229B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 2/5 short1/2 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| SAP Software - ApplicationSAP SE | 2/5 short1/2 long | +9.4% | +44.6% | +29.6% | −2.1% | −16.6% | +81.3% | +72.6% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | — | $267B | — |
| DBX Software - InfrastructureDropbox, Inc. | 2/5 short1/2 long | +1.0% | +19.1% | +49.3% | +35.0% | +24.1% | +36.2% | +21.2% | 34.4% | 0.29 | −62.6% | — | $7.9B | — |
| NOW Software - ApplicationServiceNow, Inc. | 2/5 short1/2 long | +8.6% | +42.8% | +50.0% | +1.4% | −18.5% | +37.8% | +9.8% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | — | $155B | — |
| IBM Information Technology ServicesInternational Business Machines Corporation | 1/5 short1/2 long | +4.3% | +14.4% | −3.3% | −15.3% | −12.5% | +93.5% | +116% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | — | $228B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 1/5 short1/2 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| ORCL Software - InfrastructureOracle Corporation | 0/5 short1/2 long | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| DT Software - ApplicationDynatrace, Inc. | 3/5 short0/2 long | +12.8% | +42.3% | +79.6% | +50.3% | +27.0% | +37.4% | −16.9% | 41.6% | 0.12 | −61.8% | — | $18B | — |
| CRM Software - ApplicationSalesforce, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +2.5% | +39.7% | +30.7% | −3.8% | −3.9% | +21.3% | −14.8% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | — | $200B | — |
| ESTC Software - ApplicationElastic N.V. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +6.6% | +52.4% | +95.3% | +31.8% | +14.1% | +20.1% | −43.3% | 60.4% | 0.11 | −76.8% | — | $10B | — |
| MDB Software - InfrastructureMongoDB, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −10.1% | +13.2% | +38.6% | −8.4% | +11.8% | +5.7% | −27.4% | 71.1% | 0.26 | −76.5% | — | $29B | — |
How did SNOW do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2021, along with where SNOW ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with SNOW and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: SNOW began trading on September 16, 2020, so the table starts with 2021, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- Among its popular alternatives, AMD came out ahead of SNOW most often, in all five years both traded.
- SNOW finished ahead of the S&P 500 in two of its five full calendar years.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SNOW finished in the top quarter in no of five years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 6 of 19.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of SNOW; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places SNOW among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of SNOW | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNOW This pageSnowflake Inc. | — | +42.1% | −22.4% | +38.6% | −57.6% | +20.4% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 0 of 5 | 6 of 19 | 18 of 19 | 16 of 19 | 14 of 19 | 11 of 19 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 5 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 3 of 5 | −4.8% | +17.7% | +65.1% | −58.7% | +80.9% |
| PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 3 of 5 | +135% | +340% | +167% | −64.7% | −22.7% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 5 of 5 | +77.3% | −18.1% | +128% | −55.0% | +56.9% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 5 of 5 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 4 of 5 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 4 of 5 | +83.1% | +29.3% | +84.2% | −65.6% | +73.0% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 4 of 5 | +18.6% | +87.7% | +94.1% | −15.6% | +97.9% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 4 of 5 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% |
| SAP SAP SE | 3 of 5 | −0.4% | +61.3% | +52.3% | −24.2% | +9.2% |
| DBX Dropbox, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −7.5% | +1.9% | +31.7% | −8.8% | +10.6% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 3 of 5 | −27.8% | +50.0% | +82.0% | −40.2% | +17.9% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2 of 5 | +38.2% | +39.3% | +21.9% | +10.6% | +16.6% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 5 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 3 of 5 | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 4 of 5 | −20.3% | −0.6% | +42.8% | −36.5% | +39.5% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 3 of 5 | −20.2% | +27.8% | +98.5% | −47.8% | +14.2% |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | 2 of 5 | −23.9% | −12.1% | +119% | −58.2% | −15.8% |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 3 of 5 | +80.3% | −43.1% | +108% | −62.8% | +47.4% |
Risk and diversification
How SNOW has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were SNOW's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents SNOW's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2020, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: SNOW began trading on September 16, 2020, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of SNOW's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: SNOW fell 73.0% from November 2021 to September 2024, while the S&P 500 rose 20.0%.
- None of these declines kept SNOW below its old high for long; the longest climb back took six months.
Green means SNOW fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | SNOW fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −73.0% | +20.0% | Nov 2021 | Sep 2024 | 2.8 years | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −51.7% | +11.7% | Dec 2020 | May 2021 | 5 months | Nov 2021 | 6 months |
| No named crash | −21.0% | +3.9% | Oct 2020 | Nov 2020 | 1 month | Nov 2020 | Under a month |
| No named crash | −14.4% | −4.4% | Sep 2020 | Sep 2020 | Under a month | Sep 2020 | Under a month |
| No named crash | −12.4% | +0.4% | Sep 2020 | Oct 2020 | 1 month | Oct 2020 | Under a month |
How did SNOW do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far SNOW, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: SNOW began trading on September 16, 2020, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- SNOW fell further than the S&P 500 in all two crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when SNOW fell 64.1% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, AMD held up best, falling less than SNOW in all two crashes they both traded through.
- SNOW began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but nine of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was ORCL's 41.1%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than SNOW.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNOW This pageSnowflake Inc. | — | −7.8% | −64.1% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 2 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −9.5% | −53.0% | −38.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 1 of 2 | −9.6% | −63.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −3.9% | −60.1% | −34.3% | −48.9% | −9.9% | −40.0% | −41.5% | 0.0% | −87.6% | −93.3% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 2 of 2 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 2 of 2 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −11.1% | −69.5% | −31.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −1.5% | −36.6% | −31.2% | −31.2% | −6.1% | −36.6% | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 2 of 2 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| SAP SAP SE | 2 of 2 | −2.0% | −41.9% | −32.6% | −25.0% | −6.9% | −13.3% | −25.0% | −1.4% | −49.6% | −87.9% |
| DBX Dropbox, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −5.5% | −24.0% | −30.1% | −28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −7.2% | −39.9% | −28.8% | −20.6% | −8.5% | −47.6% | — | — | — | — |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2 of 2 | −2.0% | −16.7% | −37.3% | −29.1% | −6.3% | −23.3% | −14.6% | −1.5% | −44.3% | −58.3% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 2 of 2 | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −9.2% | −46.9% | −45.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −5.3% | −42.7% | −35.7% | −24.8% | −6.1% | −34.2% | −26.9% | −4.2% | −70.5% | — |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | 1 of 2 | −11.5% | −54.4% | −40.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −15.1% | −61.3% | −45.0% | −24.9% | −2.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does SNOW move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares SNOW with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- 13 of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SNOW's 0.62, led by ANET, NVDA and NET.
- ANET took just 58% of the S&P 500's losses, against 134% for SNOW, while still keeping 191% of its gains.
- Over the past 5 years, SNOW captured 83% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 134% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.35. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than SNOW's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNOW This pageSnowflake Inc. | 83% | 134% | 0.62 | 1.35 |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 191% | 58% | 3.28 | 1.60 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 259% | 152% | 1.70 | 2.21 |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 118% | 72% | 1.65 | 1.64 |
| PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 239% | 161% | 1.48 | 1.60 |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 227% | 175% | 1.30 | 2.45 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 140% | 132% | 1.07 | 1.20 |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 106% | 104% | 1.02 | 0.73 |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 112% | 119% | 0.94 | 1.51 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 115% | 126% | 0.91 | 1.10 |
| SAP SAP SE | 115% | 141% | 0.82 | 1.13 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 159% | 213% | 0.75 | 1.77 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 125% | 170% | 0.74 | 1.45 |
| DBX Dropbox, Inc. | 68% | 105% | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 85% | 142% | 0.60 | 0.99 |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 106% | 205% | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 145% | 285% | 0.51 | 1.74 |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 57% | 127% | 0.44 | 0.77 |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | 66% | 177% | 0.37 | 1.04 |
What diversifies SNOW?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with SNOW's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing SNOW with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in SNOW into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+2.3% for SNOW alone, +8.1% for the mix).
- HDV made money in two of the two calendar years in which SNOW lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of SNOW over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.11 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which SNOW lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% SNOW and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −4.3% | 0.29 | −22.4% | −57.6% | 61.3% | +2.3% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | -0.05 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +3.8% | 48.9% | +7.5% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.11 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | 49.4% | +9.3% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | -0.02 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +10.4% | 49.0% | +7.4% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | -0.07 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +7.1% | 48.9% | +6.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.23 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | −33.5% | 51.1% | +11.3% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.18 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | −5.1% | 49.5% | +6.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.10 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −0.8% | 48.8% | +8.1% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.32 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | −10.4% | 50.5% | +8.1% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −4.3% | 0.29 | −22.4% | −57.6% | 61.3% | +2.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.25 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +54.1% | 50.6% | +11.1% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.19 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +1.3% | 52.5% | +22.8% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.11 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +17.0% | 50.8% | +19.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.08 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +51.8% | 49.7% | +10.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.01 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +86.6% | 49.5% | +13.7% |
Common questions
What was SNOW's worst drawdown?
SNOW's deepest decline since it began trading in 2020 was 73.0%, from November 2021 to September 2024. It has not yet climbed back to that peak. Because SNOW launched in September 2020, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
What were SNOW's best and worst years?
Over five full calendar years, SNOW's best year was 2025, when it returned 42.1%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -57.6%.
Is there a better investment than SNOW?
Among SNOW's popular alternatives, NVDA, GOOG and MSFT earned more than SNOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. NVDA returned 58.0% a year at 51.9% volatility, against a loss of 0.9% a year at 62.6%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AVGO (semiconductors) and MU (semiconductors) earned more than SNOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. AVGO returned 48.3% a year at 44.5% volatility, against a loss of 0.9% a year at 62.6%.
Is SNOW more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. SNOW's volatility over the past 5 years was 62.6%, 3.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SNOW's return lands within 62.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is SNOW's Sharpe ratio?
SNOW's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.29, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SNOW earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is SNOW with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, SNOW's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.35 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SNOW instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SNOW holding.
What are the best alternatives to SNOW?
Of the 18 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed SNOW in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: DDOG.
Did SNOW outperform the S&P 500?
SNOW finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of five full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +42.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did SNOW do in stock market crashes?
SNOW fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the two major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when SNOW fell 64.1% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies SNOW?
These had a low correlation with SNOW over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation -0.05), DXJ (correlation 0.11) and EMLP (correlation -0.02); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.25), CLS (correlation 0.19) and FIX (correlation 0.11). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than SNOW's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of SNOW's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.