Relative Intelligence · Cloud Computing

How Cloudflare (NET) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on NET alone. It places NET (Cloudflare, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where NET stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: NET's full trading record, from September 2019 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, NET rose 42.3% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its cloud computing peers split over the past 6 months: CRWD (CrowdStrike) rose 110%, while AKAM (Akamai Technologies) fell 8.2%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?NET lagged its own industry over the past 3 months, rising 7.0% while the cloud computing ETF SKYY (First Trust Cloud Computing ETF) rose 19.5%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its cloud computing peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: ZS (Zscaler) rose 43.2%, while CSCO (Cisco Systems) fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsNET has run far ahead of the market, rising 36.8% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (391% against 89.3%). NET finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termNET turned $10,000 into $16,600 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 69.5% off NET, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than CSCO (Cisco Systems, 35.4%) but less than OKTA (76.4%). NET fell further than the S&P 500 in two of the last three sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (69.5% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 5 years NET kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.2 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 72% as much, with a beta of 1.64. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF, cybersecurity) and CACI (CACI International, cybersecurity theme) earned more than NET with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 10.7% a year at 69.1%.
- Whole market
- 989 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NET with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA (NVIDIA), AAPL (Apple) and GOOG (Alphabet).
How much would $10,000 in NET have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in NET over the past 7 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of NET over the same span and NET's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: NET began trading on September 13, 2019, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 7 years of NET's record, starting at the end of September 2019.
- $10,000 invested in NET at the end of September 2019 would have grown to $187,012 by September 2026, more than the $28,402 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of NET, and NVDA finished highest, at $528,672.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2019 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 25 of the 3,144 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NET; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$528,672+5,187% total · +76.3% a year
- MU$254,900+2,449% total · +58.8% a year
- DELL$225,435+2,154% total · +56.1% a year
- STX$215,849+2,058% total · +55.1% a year
- AMD$211,021+2,010% total · +54.6% a year
- NET$187,012+1,770% total · +51.9% a year
- CRWD$181,581+1,716% total · +51.3% a year
- PANW$116,957+1,070% total · +42.1% a year
- FFIV$31,702+217% total · +17.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$28,402+184% total · +16.1% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 333 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NET; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MU$153,675+1,437% total · +72.7% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- ZETA$53,872+439% total · +40.0% a year
- PANW$49,770+398% total · +37.8% a year
- CRWD$43,090+331% total · +33.9% a year
- NET$30,828+208% total · +25.3% a year
- FTNT$30,603+206% total · +25.1% a year
- FFIV$22,395+124% total · +17.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- NTNX$18,676+86.8% total · +13.3% a year
NET at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: NET began trading on September 13, 2019, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
- NET's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 82.6%, from November 2021 to November 2022. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over six full calendar years, NET's best was 2020, when it returned 345%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 65.6%. It lost money in one of those years.
- NET is 19.2% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $104B
- Industry
- Software - Infrastructure
- Price history from
- September 2019
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +36.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +391%+69.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +66.1%+10.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +345%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −65.6%2022
- Losing years
- 1 of 6full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 69.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.49return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −82.6%Nov 2021 to Nov 2022
- From its all-time high
- −19.2%below the peak
NET against the whole market
Where NET ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does NET rank among all stocks?
This section ranks NET on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how NET stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- NET's 3-year return ranks in the top 5% of the 3,017 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
- NET is among the more volatile stocks: its price swings rank in the bottom 14% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | NET | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +36.8% | 805 of 3,287 | top 24% |
| 3-year return | +391% | 154 of 3,017 | top 5% |
| 5-year return | +66.1% | 938 of 2,893 | top 32% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 69.1% | 2,486 of 2,893 | bottom 15% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.49 | 945 of 2,893 | top 33% |
What has beaten NET on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). NET sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than NET with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 738 stocks and 251 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than NET over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 27% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half NET's swings, CLS has the best return for its risk: 101% a year at 59.7% volatility, 14% less than NET's 69.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.47 against 0.49 for NET.
- Among NET's popular alternatives, NVDA, PANW and CSCO are in the region. NVDA earned 58.0% a year against 10.7% a year for NET, at 51.9% volatility, 25% less than NET's 69.1%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to NET; faint dots are 91 more of the 989 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than NET?
Investments that beat NET over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among NET's popular alternatives, CRWD, GOOG and CSCO earned more than NET with less volatility over the past 5 years. CRWD returned 26.3% a year at 52.7% volatility, against 10.7% a year at 69.1%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIBR (cybersecurity) and CACI (cybersecurity theme) earned more than NET with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 10.7% a year at 69.1%.
- Across the whole market, 989 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NET with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA, AAPL and GOOG.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat NET over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks NET's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than NET follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than NET's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× NET's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than NET's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with NET?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +10.7% | 69.1% | 0.49 | −82.6% | +66.1% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.38 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against NET. 9 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.3% | 52.7% | 0.71 | −67.7% | +221% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +138% | 0.27 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +118% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +884% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +299% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +156% | 0.34 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Cloud Computing and the categories next to it (Cybersecurity, Bitcoin Mining, Data Center REITs, Software), plus NET's specific themes. 15 of 76 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +93.2% | 0.66 | 0.58% | |
CACICACI International Inc · Business Services · Cybersecurity theme | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +16.6% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | +115% | -0.01 | — | |
ZETAZeta Global Holdings Corp. · Software | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +33.2% | 70.5% | 0.77 | −70.0% | +320% | 0.38 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +99.8% | 0.33 | — | ||
FICOFair Isaac Corporation · Application Software | Higher return, lower volatility | +14.3% | 45.5% | 0.52 | −75.1% | +94.8% | -0.03 | — | |
QLYSQualys, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Similar return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +10.6% | 42.8% | 0.45 | −63.0% | +65.9% | 0.36 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,304 of 3,537 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +1,244% | 0.14 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +35.7% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | +359% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +800% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +133% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +631% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +97.2% | 0.49 | 0.18% | ||
PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | +64.4% | 0.31 | 0.79% | |
CORTCorcept Therapeutics Incorporated · Biotechnology | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +43.0% | 75.9% | 0.81 | −71.9% | +498% | -0.03 | — | |
What these numbers mean for NET
- Annual return
- NET returned 10.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $16,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- NET's volatility over the past 5 years was 69.1%, 4.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NET's return lands within 69.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- NET's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.49, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NET earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- NET's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 82.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 82.6% fall takes a 474% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, NET's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.38 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NET instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NET holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 989 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than NET with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with NET | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +1,244% | 0.14 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +35.7% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | +359% | 0.35 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +800% | 0.16 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +133% | 0.25 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +631% | 0.16 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +293% | 0.25 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | -0.04 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +48.8% | 62.1% | 0.95 | −73.3% | +630% | 0.10 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +158% | 0.10 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +87.8% | -0.01 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | 0.05 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +82.1% | -0.22 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +123% | 0.31 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +97.2% | 0.49 | 0.18% | |
| 15 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +113% | -0.12 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +121% | -0.24 | — | |
| 17 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | +839% | -0.07 | — |
| 18 | Whole market | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +866% | 0.18 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +145% | -0.26 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +180% | -0.17 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +326% | -0.09 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +126% | -0.11 | 0.40% | |
| 23 | Popular alternative | +26.3% | 52.7% | 0.71 | −67.7% | +221% | 0.58 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +162% | -0.16 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +177% | -0.26 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +57.3% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −66.9% | +863% | 0.09 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +195% | -0.04 | — | |
| 28 | ARISAris Mining Corporation · Gold | Whole market | +33.4% | 53.9% | 0.81 | −68.0% | +322% | -0.03 | — |
| 29 | Whole market | +18.6% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | +135% | -0.14 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +121% | -0.17 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.00 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +705% | -0.02 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +45.2% | 52.6% | 0.97 | −49.5% | +546% | 0.17 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +236% | -0.05 | — | |
| 35 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +435% | 0.17 | — |
| 36 | Whole market | +18.9% | 37.3% | 0.65 | −53.9% | +138% | -0.07 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +108% | 0.16 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +20.9% | 55.4% | 0.62 | −51.6% | +159% | 0.33 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +594% | 0.08 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.09 | — | |
| 41 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | +156% | -0.03 | 0.80% |
| 42 | Whole market | +19.9% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | +147% | 0.04 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +1,636% | 0.26 | — | |
| 44 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +208% | -0.09 | — |
| 45 | IYWiShares U.S. Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +19.0% | 26.6% | 0.79 | −39.4% | +138% | 0.49 | 0.37% |
| 46 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +461% | -0.13 | — |
| 47 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +187% | 0.12 | — | |
| 48 | NMRNomura Holdings, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +17.1% | 29.9% | 0.68 | −54.0% | +120% | 0.02 | — |
| 49 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +102% | -0.15 | — |
| 50 | Whole market | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +617% | 0.32 | — | |
| 51 | PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Whole market | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +105% | -0.05 | — |
| 52 | Popular alternative | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +138% | 0.27 | — | |
| 53 | VIVTelefônica Brasil S.A. · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +15.3% | 28.8% | 0.64 | −56.6% | +104% | 0.05 | — |
| 54 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +153% | 0.23 | 0.59% |
| 55 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +82.3% | 0.38 | 0.03% | |
| 56 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +218% | -0.17 | — |
| 57 | XLGInvesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.8% | 18.9% | 0.78 | −30.5% | +91.0% | 0.44 | 0.20% |
| 58 | FNFabrinet · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +29.2% | 57.1% | 0.74 | −52.4% | +260% | 0.07 | — |
| 59 | PSOPearson plc · Education Services | Whole market | +18.5% | 27.9% | 0.75 | −58.4% | +133% | -0.14 | — |
| 60 | FRHCFreedom Holding Corp. · Investment Banking & Brokerage | Whole market | +21.2% | 40.5% | 0.67 | −45.9% | +161% | 0.30 | — |
| 61 | FCFSFirstCash Holdings, Inc · Consumer Finance | Whole market | +20.6% | 30.5% | 0.77 | −50.2% | +155% | -0.08 | — |
| 62 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +159% | 0.07 | — |
| 63 | ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF · US Total Market | Whole market | +12.9% | 22.5% | 0.65 | −35.2% | +83.6% | 0.50 | 0.21% |
| 64 | CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,082% | 0.09 | — |
| 65 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +232% | -0.15 | — | |
| 66 | Popular alternative | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +118% | 0.25 | — | |
| 67 | TRMDTORM plc · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +54.3% | 45.9% | 1.18 | −60.6% | +776% | -0.16 | — |
| 68 | FSSFederal Signal Corporation · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +23.3% | 31.7% | 0.82 | −33.0% | +185% | 0.18 | — |
| 69 | MATXMatson, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +24.9% | 39.4% | 0.76 | −53.6% | +204% | 0.08 | — |
| 70 | PDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Broad Commodities | Whole market | +11.7% | 19.3% | 0.67 | −40.7% | +73.9% | -0.04 | 0.74% |
| 71 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +122% | 0.25 | — | |
| 72 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | +168% | 0.23 | 0.19% |
| 73 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +218% | -0.07 | — | |
| 74 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | +93.2% | 0.39 | 0.12% |
| 75 | TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +50.5% | 45.1% | 1.14 | −63.4% | +673% | -0.10 | — |
| 76 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +413% | 0.04 | — |
| 77 | SFMSprouts Farmers Market, Inc. · Grocery Stores | Whole market | +23.8% | 40.3% | 0.74 | −65.2% | +191% | 0.02 | — |
| 78 | PSMTPriceSmart, Inc. · Discount Retail | Whole market | +18.6% | 28.2% | 0.75 | −53.2% | +135% | 0.00 | — |
| 79 | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +25.2% | 42.8% | 0.74 | −57.2% | +208% | -0.07 | — |
| 80 | VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +20.8% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | +158% | 0.08 | — |
| 81 | USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +359% | 0.03 | — |
| 82 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +111% | 0.29 | 0.50% |
| 83 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +82.5% | 0.01 | — | |
| 84 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +83.4% | 0.01 | 0.98% |
| 85 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | 0.01 | 0.48% |
| 86 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | -0.08 | 0.40% |
| 87 | CSWCSW Industrials, Inc. · Industrial Products | Whole market | +17.1% | 34.4% | 0.63 | −46.2% | +120% | 0.17 | — |
| 88 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +98.2% | -0.14 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +144% | 0.05 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +288% | 0.11 | — | |
| 91 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | +101% | 0.44 | 0.45% |
| 92 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +87.6% | 0.04 | 0.09% |
| 93 | NICNicolet Bankshares, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 30.1% | 0.73 | −44.3% | +139% | 0.01 | — |
| 94 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +319% | -0.08 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +79.2% | 0.00 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +159% | -0.25 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +37.4% | 49.9% | 0.89 | −56.4% | +390% | 0.22 | — | |
| 98 | EZPWEZCORP, Inc. · Financial - Credit Services | Whole market | +33.2% | 35.4% | 0.99 | −76.6% | +320% | -0.05 | — |
| 99 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +667% | -0.06 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +634% | 0.32 | — |
NET against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against NET, compared period by period and year by year.
How do NET's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at NET, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Nine of the 20 popular alternatives, led by NVDA, PANW and CRWD, were both more rewarding and calmer than NET over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, NET returned 10.7% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (69.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than NET with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | +31.9% | 43.4% |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | +26.3% | 52.7% |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | +20.7% | 44.8% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | +17.1% | 30.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.8% | 26.1% |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | +13.5% | 49.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| NET This pageCloudflare, Inc. | +10.7% | 69.1% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | +10.1% | 59.7% |
| GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | +9.3% | 35.8% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | +6.6% | 27.8% |
| DOCN DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. | +1.9% | 72.9% |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | −3.6% | 41.6% |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | −3.7% | 39.2% |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | −5.4% | 60.1% |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | −6.3% | 57.9% |
| FSLY Fastly, Inc. | −14.9% | 89.6% |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | −18.9% | 62.9% |
Has NET consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares NET with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than NET helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- CRWD outperformed NET in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Only one of the 20 popular alternatives, CRWD, outperformed NET in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- NVDA, PANW and CSCO earned more for the risk they took than NET (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than NET over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. (this page) | — | −17.1% | +7.0% | +42.3% | +48.7% | +36.8% | +391% | +66.1% | 69.1% | 0.49 | −82.6% | — | $104B | — |
| CRWD QualifiedCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 5/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | −8.8% | +14.5% | +110% | +101% | +80.6% | +409% | +221% | 52.7% | 0.71 | −67.7% | — | $233B | — |
| NVDA SemiconductorsNVIDIA Corporation | 1/5 short2/2 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| FFIV Software - InfrastructureF5, Inc. | 5/5 short1/2 long | +1.5% | +10.9% | +45.4% | +78.0% | +54.0% | +208% | +120% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | — | $26B | — |
| PANW Software - InfrastructurePalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 4/5 short1/2 long | −8.5% | −2.4% | +101% | +89.7% | +60.6% | +180% | +299% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | — | $278B | — |
| FTNT Software - InfrastructureFortinet, Inc. | 4/5 short1/2 long | −2.5% | +6.6% | +107% | +119% | +101% | +203% | +156% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | — | $125B | — |
| NTNX Software - InfrastructureNutanix, Inc. | 3/5 short1/2 long | −2.6% | +23.8% | +68.0% | +34.8% | −0.1% | +90.0% | +88.3% | 49.2% | 0.50 | −80.4% | — | $18B | — |
| CSCO Communication EquipmentCisco Systems, Inc. | 2/5 short1/2 long | −3.9% | −3.2% | +22.6% | +42.2% | +53.8% | +118% | +118% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $421B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 2/5 short1/2 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| GOOG Internet Content & InformationAlphabet Inc. | 1/5 short1/2 long | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| OKTA Software - InfrastructureOkta, Inc. | 5/5 short0/2 long | +1.4% | +30.7% | +156% | +132% | +120% | +157% | −24.3% | 60.1% | 0.21 | −84.6% | — | $32B | — |
| DDOG Software - ApplicationDatadog, Inc. | 4/5 short0/2 long | +4.6% | −2.6% | +97.6% | +91.7% | +64.1% | +198% | +61.4% | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | $92B | — |
| DT Software - ApplicationDynatrace, Inc. | 4/5 short0/2 long | +12.8% | +42.3% | +79.6% | +50.3% | +27.0% | +37.4% | −16.9% | 41.6% | 0.12 | −61.8% | — | $18B | — |
| S Software - InfrastructureSentinelOne, Inc. | 4/5 short0/2 long | −7.6% | +13.1% | +53.6% | +50.3% | +28.4% | +37.7% | −64.8% | 62.9% | -0.01 | −84.4% | — | $7.5B | — |
| ZS Software - InfrastructureZscaler, Inc. | 3/5 short0/2 long | +3.6% | +43.2% | +59.1% | −2.7% | −29.9% | +32.3% | −27.9% | 57.9% | 0.18 | −76.4% | — | $35B | — |
| FSLY Software - ApplicationFastly, Inc. | 3/5 short0/2 long | −19.5% | +7.8% | −13.1% | +117% | +167% | +50.5% | −55.3% | 89.6% | 0.26 | −96.1% | — | $3.5B | — |
| GDDY Software - InfrastructureGoDaddy Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +3.8% | +14.7% | +24.2% | −8.2% | −17.9% | +46.1% | +55.8% | 35.8% | 0.43 | −65.0% | — | $14B | — |
| DOCN Software - InfrastructureDigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | −31.9% | −16.5% | +11.1% | +103% | +142% | +362% | +10.1% | 72.9% | 0.39 | −84.8% | — | $12B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| EQIX REIT - SpecialtyEquinix, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −6.6% | −2.5% | −9.7% | +31.2% | +22.2% | +49.1% | +37.4% | 27.8% | 0.37 | −41.8% | — | $97B | — |
| AKAM Software - InfrastructureAkamai Technologies, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −23.7% | −27.2% | −8.2% | +5.3% | +20.7% | −13.8% | −17.1% | 39.2% | 0.10 | −46.8% | — | $13B | — |
How did NET do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2020, along with where NET ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with NET and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: NET began trading on September 13, 2019, so the table starts with 2020, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
- NET finished ahead of the S&P 500 in five of its six full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, NET finished in the top quarter in three of six years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 1 of 21.
- Among its popular alternatives, NVDA came out ahead of NET most often, in four of the six years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of NET; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places NET among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of NET | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NET This pageCloudflare, Inc. | — | +83.1% | +29.3% | +84.2% | −65.6% | +73.0% | +345% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 6 | 1 of 21 | 8 of 21 | 7 of 21 | 17 of 21 | 4 of 19 | 1 of 19 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1 of 6 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 6 | +37.0% | +34.0% | +143% | −48.6% | −3.3% | +325% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 4 of 6 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 2 of 6 | +1.5% | +40.5% | +24.7% | −41.3% | +39.1% | +26.0% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 2 of 6 | +1.2% | +23.4% | +111% | −24.8% | +56.7% | +53.7% |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −16.0% | +61.4% | +19.7% | −32.0% | +142% | +39.2% |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −15.5% | +28.3% | +83.1% | −18.2% | 0.0% | +1.9% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1 of 6 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 1 of 6 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 2 of 6 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 0 of 6 | +9.7% | −13.0% | +32.5% | −69.5% | −11.8% | +120% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −4.8% | +17.7% | +65.1% | −58.7% | +80.9% | +161% |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −20.3% | −0.6% | +42.8% | −36.5% | +39.5% | +71.0% |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −32.4% | −19.1% | +88.1% | −71.1% | — | — |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | 1 of 6 | +24.7% | −18.6% | +98.0% | −65.2% | +60.9% | +329% |
| FSLY Fastly, Inc. | 1 of 6 | +7.8% | −47.0% | +117% | −76.9% | −59.4% | +335% |
| GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | 2 of 6 | −37.1% | +85.9% | +41.9% | −11.8% | +2.3% | +22.1% |
| DOCN DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 4 | +41.2% | −7.1% | +44.0% | −68.3% | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 2 of 6 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −16.9% | +19.4% | +25.4% | −21.1% | +20.3% | +24.2% |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −8.8% | −19.2% | +40.4% | −28.0% | +11.5% | +21.6% |
Risk and diversification
How NET has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were NET's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents NET's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2019, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: NET began trading on September 13, 2019, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of NET's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: NET fell 36.8% from October 2025 to February 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 0.3%.
- The slowest recovery came after NET fell 82.6% from November 2021 to November 2022; it did not regain that peak until September 2025, three years later.
Green means NET fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | NET fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −82.6% | −19.1% | Nov 2021 | Nov 2022 | 12 months | Sep 2025 | 2.8 years |
| No named crash | −36.8% | +0.3% | Oct 2025 | Feb 2026 | 4 months | May 2026 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −33.9% | −2.2% | Feb 2021 | Mar 2021 | 1 month | Jun 2021 | 3 months |
| Covid crash | −31.8% | −20.7% | Mar 2020 | Mar 2020 | Under a month | Mar 2020 | Under a month |
| No named crash | −30.3% | +0.3% | Sep 2019 | Oct 2019 | 1 month | Feb 2020 | 4 months |
How did NET do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far NET, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: NET began trading on September 13, 2019, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- NET fell further than the S&P 500 in two of the three crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when NET fell 69.5% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CSCO held up best, falling less than NET in all three crashes they both traded through.
- NET began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but eight of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MSFT's 57.9%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than NET.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NET This pageCloudflare, Inc. | — | −11.1% | −69.5% | −31.8% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 3 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −7.1% | −42.7% | −50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 2 of 3 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −5.6% | −42.7% | −32.1% | −24.7% | −5.5% | −35.0% | −31.6% | −3.7% | −59.2% | −96.8% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −2.1% | −30.6% | −46.8% | −29.1% | −3.3% | −40.2% | — | — | — | — |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −4.9% | −30.6% | −36.5% | −29.0% | −4.4% | −50.2% | −23.0% | −4.1% | — | — |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −7.0% | −55.9% | −66.6% | −22.6% | −4.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 3 of 3 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 3 of 3 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −7.0% | −76.4% | −31.1% | −33.4% | −2.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −9.5% | −53.0% | −38.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −9.2% | −46.9% | −45.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −10.4% | −59.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −8.3% | −55.3% | −39.4% | −24.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FSLY Fastly, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −12.8% | −77.4% | −54.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | 2 of 3 | −5.6% | −25.3% | −45.8% | −28.9% | −7.1% | −29.2% | — | — | — | — |
| DOCN DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 2 | −10.3% | −58.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −4.1% | −36.3% | −25.1% | −22.8% | −6.3% | −15.8% | −22.5% | −1.1% | −69.9% | — |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −4.9% | −36.0% | −21.9% | −20.6% | −4.9% | −47.6% | −39.2% | −4.5% | −77.0% | −99.8% |
How closely does NET move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares NET with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- Over the past 5 years, NET captured 118% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 72% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.64. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only NTNX, CRWD and NVDA had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than NET's 1.65, out of 19 popular alternatives with the same record.
- PANW took just -13% of the S&P 500's losses, against 72% for NET, while still keeping 104% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than NET's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NET This pageCloudflare, Inc. | 118% | 72% | 1.65 | 1.64 |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 43% | 2% | 28.70 | 0.63 |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 122% | 38% | 3.21 | 1.19 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 259% | 152% | 1.70 | 2.21 |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 119% | 75% | 1.59 | 1.03 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 98% | 75% | 1.31 | 0.99 |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 102% | 83% | 1.22 | 1.03 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 140% | 132% | 1.07 | 1.20 |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 112% | 119% | 0.94 | 1.51 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 115% | 126% | 0.91 | 1.10 |
| GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | 63% | 76% | 0.84 | 0.94 |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 79% | 100% | 0.79 | 0.98 |
| DOCN DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. | 167% | 223% | 0.75 | 1.70 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 125% | 170% | 0.74 | 1.45 |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 66% | 117% | 0.56 | 0.62 |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 39% | 87% | 0.45 | 0.74 |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 57% | 127% | 0.44 | 0.77 |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | 39% | 105% | 0.37 | 0.93 |
| FSLY Fastly, Inc. | 13% | 80% | 0.16 | 0.30 |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 16% | 129% | 0.12 | 0.70 |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 104% | -13% | — | 0.93 |
What diversifies NET?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with NET's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing NET with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in NET into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+25.2% for NET alone, +28.5% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of NET over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.06 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- In 2022, the one year NET lost money (-65.6%), LVHI returned +3.8%.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which NET lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% NET and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +66.1% | 0.49 | −65.6% | 67.5% | +25.3% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | -0.08 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | 53.9% | +27.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.01 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | 54.1% | +29.9% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.06 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | 54.3% | +27.5% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | -0.07 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | 53.9% | +27.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.35 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | 56.9% | +31.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.17 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | 54.4% | +26.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.11 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | 53.8% | +28.5% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.30 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | 55.4% | +28.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +66.1% | 0.49 | −65.6% | 67.5% | +25.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.09 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | 54.8% | +32.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.34 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | 59.1% | +44.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.26 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | 57.1% | +41.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.04 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | 54.1% | +32.2% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.11 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | 55.1% | +34.5% |
Common questions
What was NET's worst drawdown?
NET's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 82.6%, from November 2021 to November 2022. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because NET launched in September 2019, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
What were NET's best and worst years?
Over six full calendar years, NET's best year was 2020, when it returned 345%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -65.6%.
Is there a better investment than NET?
Among NET's popular alternatives, CRWD, GOOG and CSCO earned more than NET with less volatility over the past 5 years. CRWD returned 26.3% a year at 52.7% volatility, against 10.7% a year at 69.1%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIBR (cybersecurity) and CACI (cybersecurity theme) earned more than NET with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against 10.7% a year at 69.1%.
Is NET more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. NET's volatility over the past 5 years was 69.1%, 4.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NET's return lands within 69.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is NET's Sharpe ratio?
NET's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.49, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NET earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is NET with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, NET's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.38 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NET instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NET holding.
What are the best alternatives to NET?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed NET in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CRWD.
Did NET outperform the S&P 500?
NET finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of six full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +83.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did NET do in stock market crashes?
NET fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the three major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when NET fell 69.5% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies NET?
These had a low correlation with NET over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation -0.08), DXJ (correlation 0.01) and EMLP (correlation 0.06); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.09), CLS (correlation 0.34) and FIX (correlation 0.26). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than NET's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of NET's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to NET
CRWDCrowdStrike
NVDANVIDIA
PANWPalo Alto Networks
FTNTFortinet
CSCOCisco Systems
MSFTMicrosoft
GOOGAlphabet
DDOGDatadog
AMZNAmazon.com
EQIXEquinix