Relative Intelligence · Cybersecurity

How CrowdStrike (CRWD) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CRWD alone. It places CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CRWD stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CRWD's full trading record, from June 2019 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, CRWD rose 110% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its cybersecurity peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from OKTA (up 156%) to MSFT (Microsoft, up 27.7%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the cybersecurity ETF CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF) rose 9.4% over the past 3 months, with MSFT (Microsoft, up 32.5%) and ZS (Zscaler, up 43.2%), against 3.9% for the S&P 500. Its cybersecurity peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: ZS rose 43.2%, while PANW (Palo Alto Networks) fell 2.4%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsCRWD has run far ahead of the market, rising 80.6% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (409% against 89.3%). CRWD finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termCRWD turned $10,000 into $32,100 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. CRWD's 5-year return of 221% puts it ahead of 90% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 42.7% off CRWD, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than MSFT (Microsoft, 31.0%) but less than NET (Cloudflare, 69.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, CRWD has a correlation of 0.34 over 5 years, less closely than 63% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 5 years, CRWD's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.19: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.2 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 38% as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- AVGO (Broadcom, semiconductors) and ANET (Arista Networks, communications equipment) earned more than CRWD with less volatility over the past 5 years. AVGO returned 48.3% a year at 44.5% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 52.7%.
- Whole market
- 138 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CRWD with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), AVGO (Broadcom) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company).
How much would $10,000 in CRWD have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CRWD over the past 7 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CRWD over the same span and CRWD's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: CRWD began trading on June 12, 2019, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 7 years of CRWD's record, starting at the end of September 2019.
- $10,000 invested in CRWD at the end of September 2019 would have grown to $181,581 by September 2026, more than the $28,402 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CRWD, and NVDA finished highest, at $528,672.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2019 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 27 of the 3,144 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CRWD; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$528,672+5,187% total · +76.3% a year
- FIX$388,188+3,782% total · +68.7% a year
- DELL$225,435+2,154% total · +56.1% a year
- STX$215,849+2,058% total · +55.1% a year
- NET$187,012+1,770% total · +51.9% a year
- CRWD$181,581+1,716% total · +51.3% a year
- PANW$116,957+1,070% total · +42.1% a year
- FTNT$116,452+1,065% total · +42.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$28,402+184% total · +16.1% a year
- OKTA$21,239+112% total · +11.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 173 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CRWD; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ANET$94,783+848% total · +56.8% a year
- AVGO$79,117+691% total · +51.2% a year
- ASX$70,798+608% total · +47.9% a year
- KLAC$61,203+512% total · +43.7% a year
- PANW$49,770+398% total · +37.8% a year
- CRWD$43,090+331% total · +33.9% a year
- FTNT$30,603+206% total · +25.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- QLYS$16,821+68.2% total · +11.0% a year
- OKTA$8,811−11.9% total · −2.5% a year
CRWD at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: CRWD began trading on June 12, 2019, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
- CRWD's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 67.7%, from November 2021 to January 2023. It took 12 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over six full calendar years, CRWD's best was 2020, when it returned 325%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 48.6%. It lost money in two of those years.
- CRWD is 18.5% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $233B
- Industry
- Software - Infrastructure
- Price history from
- June 2019
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +80.6%total return
- Past 3 years
- +409%+72.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +221%+26.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +325%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −48.6%2022
- Losing years
- 2 of 6full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 52.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.71return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −67.7%Nov 2021 to Jan 2023
- From its all-time high
- −18.5%below the peak
CRWD against the whole market
Where CRWD ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CRWD rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CRWD on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CRWD stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- CRWD's 3-year return ranks in the top 5% of the 3,017 stocks worth at least $300 million with 3 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CRWD | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +80.6% | 272 of 3,287 | top 8% |
| 3-year return | +409% | 142 of 3,017 | top 5% |
| 5-year return | +221% | 277 of 2,893 | top 10% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 52.7% | 2,022 of 2,893 | bottom 31% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.71 | 446 of 2,893 | top 15% |
What has beaten CRWD on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CRWD sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CRWD with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 133 stocks and five ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CRWD over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 4% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half CRWD's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, 11% less than CRWD's 52.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.46 against 0.71 for CRWD.
- Among CRWD's popular alternatives, PANW is in the region. PANW earned 31.9% a year against 26.3% a year for CRWD, at 43.4% volatility, 18% less than CRWD's 52.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CRWD; faint dots are 90 more of the 138 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than CRWD?
Investments that beat CRWD over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among CRWD's popular alternatives, PANW earned more than CRWD with less volatility over the past 5 years: 31.9% a year at 43.4% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 52.7%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AVGO (semiconductors) and ANET (communications equipment) earned more than CRWD with less volatility over the past 5 years. AVGO returned 48.3% a year at 44.5% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 52.7%.
- Across the whole market, 138 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CRWD with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them TSM, AVGO and LLY.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CRWD over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CRWD's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than CRWD follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CRWD's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CRWD's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CRWD's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with CRWD?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +26.3% | 52.7% | 0.71 | −67.7% | +221% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.34 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against CRWD. 1 of 21 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +299% | 0.71 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Cybersecurity and Software and the categories next to it (Cloud Computing, Application Software, Communications Equipment, Enterprise Software, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus CRWD's specific themes. 17 of 130 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +617% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +634% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +413% | 0.18 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +631% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +293% | 0.20 | — | ||
TSEMTower Semiconductor Ltd. · Semiconductors | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +42.5% | 52.2% | 0.93 | −62.3% | +487% | 0.16 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 201 of 3,482 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.10 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +1,636% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +800% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +232% | -0.34 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | 0.11 | 0.48% | |
EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +264% | -0.02 | 0.59% | |
KNSAKiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc · Biotechnology | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +50.2% | 53.7% | 1.02 | −83.1% | +665% | -0.18 | — | |
What these numbers mean for CRWD
- Annual return
- CRWD returned 26.3% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $32,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CRWD's volatility over the past 5 years was 52.7%, 3.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CRWD's return lands within 52.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CRWD's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.71, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CRWD earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CRWD's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 67.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 67.7% fall takes a 210% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CRWD's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.34 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CRWD instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CRWD holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 138 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than CRWD with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with CRWD | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.10 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +1,636% | 0.11 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.30 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | -0.13 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +288% | 0.04 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +319% | -0.11 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +413% | -0.09 | — | |
| 8 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | +839% | -0.12 | — |
| 9 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +329% | 0.26 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +355% | 0.26 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +326% | -0.12 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +327% | -0.25 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +425% | 0.18 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +31.4% | 42.1% | 0.86 | −51.5% | +292% | 0.02 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +53.4% | 48.6% | 1.13 | −53.3% | +748% | 0.16 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +315% | 0.44 | — | |
| 17 | Same or nearby category | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +617% | 0.26 | — | |
| 18 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +435% | 0.14 | — |
| 19 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +499% | 0.02 | — |
| 20 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +283% | 0.09 | — |
| 21 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +270% | -0.12 | — |
| 22 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +283% | 0.03 | — |
| 23 | RLRalph Lauren Corporation · Apparel & Footwear | Whole market | +28.6% | 36.9% | 0.87 | −55.1% | +251% | 0.09 | — |
| 24 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +461% | -0.17 | — |
| 25 | Same or nearby category | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +634% | 0.22 | — | |
| 26 | MLIMueller Industries, Inc. · Metal Fabrication | Whole market | +38.9% | 33.4% | 1.16 | −53.0% | +417% | -0.07 | — |
| 27 | FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +726% | -0.01 | — |
| 28 | Same or nearby category | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +413% | 0.18 | — | |
| 29 | Same or nearby category | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +631% | 0.23 | — | |
| 30 | SANMSanmina Corporation · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +34.7% | 47.8% | 0.86 | −55.9% | +343% | 0.12 | — |
| 31 | SNEXStoneX Group Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +33.0% | 37.3% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +316% | -0.01 | — |
| 32 | Popular alternative | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +299% | 0.71 | — | |
| 33 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | +245% | 0.10 | — |
| 34 | TRMDTORM plc · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +54.3% | 45.9% | 1.18 | −60.6% | +776% | -0.18 | — |
| 35 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +301% | 0.05 | — |
| 36 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +413% | -0.09 | — |
| 37 | USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +359% | -0.03 | — |
| 38 | HWKNHawkins, Inc. · Chemicals - Specialty | Whole market | +29.1% | 36.5% | 0.89 | −44.8% | +259% | 0.12 | — |
| 39 | HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc. · Consulting Services | Whole market | +29.7% | 40.7% | 0.84 | −51.4% | +268% | -0.12 | — |
| 40 | UFPTUFP Technologies, Inc. · Medical - Devices | Whole market | +35.8% | 46.0% | 0.90 | −48.3% | +362% | 0.06 | — |
| 41 | PLPCPreformed Line Products Company · Electrical Equipment & Parts | Whole market | +40.5% | 48.3% | 0.94 | −59.5% | +447% | 0.15 | — |
| 42 | ESQEsquire Financial Holdings, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.7% | 31.7% | 1.03 | −56.5% | +296% | -0.09 | — |
| 43 | Whole market | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +866% | 0.27 | — | |
| 44 | IGICInternational General Insurance Holdings Ltd. · Insurance - Diversified | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.9% | 1.03 | −50.6% | +283% | -0.09 | — |
| 45 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +301% | -0.04 | — | |
| 46 | ODCOil-Dri Corporation of America · Chemicals - Specialty | Whole market | +35.9% | 36.9% | 1.02 | −48.9% | +364% | -0.11 | — |
| 47 | NWPXNWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +32.5% | 36.2% | 0.96 | −46.5% | +309% | -0.06 | — |
| 48 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +235% | -0.04 | — | |
| 49 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +264% | -0.02 | 0.59% |
| 50 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +264% | -0.10 | — | |
| 51 | CLMBClimb Global Solutions, Inc. · Technology Distributors | Whole market | +37.8% | 45.5% | 0.94 | −53.4% | +397% | 0.26 | — |
| 52 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +236% | -0.09 | — | |
| 53 | Same or nearby category | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +293% | 0.20 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +295% | -0.05 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +413% | -0.04 | — | |
| 56 | JBLJabil Inc. · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +35.8% | 39.6% | 0.97 | −57.3% | +361% | 0.14 | — |
| 57 | SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP · Water Utilities | Whole market | +39.1% | 37.1% | 1.08 | −62.0% | +420% | -0.06 | — |
| 58 | NVTnVent Electric plc · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +35.4% | 38.0% | 0.99 | −56.2% | +356% | 0.26 | — |
| 59 | CHEFThe Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +27.5% | 39.8% | 0.81 | −91.3% | +237% | 0.13 | — |
| 60 | Same or nearby category | +37.4% | 49.9% | 0.89 | −56.4% | +390% | 0.30 | — | |
| 61 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +250% | -0.08 | — |
| 62 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +690% | -0.03 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +705% | -0.19 | — | |
| 64 | JXNJackson Financial Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +41.7% | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | +472% | -0.11 | — |
| 65 | Same or nearby category | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +323% | 0.37 | 0.35% | |
| 66 | STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +32.2% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | +304% | 0.14 | — |
| 67 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +594% | 0.00 | — | |
| 68 | TFPMTriple Flag Precious Metals Corp. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +29.3% | 37.7% | 0.87 | −36.2% | +262% | -0.20 | — |
| 69 | GFFGriffon Corporation · Building Products | Whole market | +36.4% | 41.7% | 0.95 | −61.3% | +371% | -0.06 | — |
| 70 | SOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Whole market | +28.3% | 38.9% | 0.84 | −46.0% | +248% | 0.38 | 0.19% |
| 71 | AGIAlamos Gold Inc. · Gold Mining | Whole market | +32.6% | 42.4% | 0.88 | −66.1% | +310% | -0.08 | — |
| 72 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +1,008% | -0.02 | — |
| 73 | CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,082% | -0.04 | — |
| 74 | NPOEnPro Industries, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +28.1% | 36.0% | 0.87 | −65.8% | +245% | -0.03 | — |
| 75 | TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +50.5% | 45.1% | 1.14 | −63.4% | +673% | -0.06 | — |
| 76 | STNGScorpio Tankers Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +37.9% | 43.6% | 0.96 | −80.6% | +398% | -0.14 | — |
| 77 | GLNGGolar LNG Limited · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +29.4% | 37.8% | 0.87 | −86.3% | +262% | -0.06 | — |
| 78 | MTRNMaterion Corporation · Specialty Materials | Whole market | +27.9% | 46.1% | 0.76 | −62.0% | +242% | 0.13 | — |
| 79 | LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +783% | -0.10 | — |
| 80 | CVSACovista Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +28.9% | 43.3% | 0.81 | −66.1% | +257% | 0.15 | — |
| 81 | HCCWarrior Met Coal, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +29.5% | 48.5% | 0.78 | −64.8% | +264% | 0.04 | — |
| 82 | PAMPampa Energía S.A. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +30.2% | 45.1% | 0.81 | −87.4% | +274% | 0.09 | — |
| 83 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +366% | 0.13 | — | |
| 84 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +292% | 0.07 | — |
| 85 | EZPWEZCORP, Inc. · Financial - Credit Services | Whole market | +33.2% | 35.4% | 0.99 | −76.6% | +320% | -0.01 | — |
| 86 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +667% | -0.23 | — | |
| 87 | TENTsakos Energy Navigation Limited · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +46.9% | 46.3% | 1.07 | −68.7% | +585% | -0.05 | — |
| 88 | TKTeekay Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +47.1% | 41.7% | 1.13 | −83.8% | +589% | -0.05 | — |
| 89 | PBTPermian Basin Royalty Trust · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +37.8% | 47.2% | 0.92 | −74.0% | +397% | -0.01 | — |
| 90 | AKO-AEmbotelladora Andina S.A. · Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Whole market | +28.4% | 42.8% | 0.80 | −63.5% | +249% | 0.09 | — |
| 91 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +524% | -0.05 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +319% | -0.04 | — | |
| 93 | IRSIRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima · Real Estate - Diversified | Whole market | +34.5% | 48.9% | 0.85 | −91.6% | +339% | 0.13 | — |
| 94 | ASCArdmore Shipping Corporation · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +41.7% | 44.8% | 1.01 | −71.2% | +472% | -0.17 | — |
| 95 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +318% | -0.21 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +473% | -0.04 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +337% | -0.28 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +28.8% | 48.4% | 0.77 | −83.3% | +255% | 0.22 | — | |
| 99 | FTITechnipFMC plc · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +54.1% | 41.3% | 1.26 | −85.8% | +769% | -0.26 | — |
| 100 | Whole market | +40.4% | 49.9% | 0.93 | −66.3% | +445% | -0.05 | — |
CRWD against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CRWD, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CRWD's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CRWD, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only PANW was both more rewarding and calmer than CRWD over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 26.3% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (52.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CRWD with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | +31.9% | 43.4% |
| CRWD This pageCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | +26.3% | 52.7% |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | +20.7% | 44.8% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | +17.1% | 30.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.8% | 26.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | +10.7% | 69.1% |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | +10.7% | 42.8% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | +10.1% | 59.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | +2.8% | 29.0% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | +1.9% | 45.5% |
| GEN Gen Digital Inc. | +0.4% | 32.9% |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | −0.9% | 62.6% |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | −3.5% | 38.8% |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | −3.7% | 39.2% |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | −5.2% | 53.7% |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | −5.3% | 47.7% |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | −5.4% | 60.1% |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | −6.3% | 57.9% |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | −18.9% | 62.9% |
| RPD Rapid7, Inc. | −36.2% | 58.4% |
Has CRWD consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CRWD with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CRWD helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 21 popular alternatives outperformed CRWD in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes. The closest was PANW.
- PANW and CSCO earned more for the risk they took than CRWD (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CRWD over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (this page) | — | −8.8% | +14.5% | +110% | +101% | +80.6% | +409% | +221% | 52.7% | 0.71 | −67.7% | — | $233B | — |
| PANW Software - InfrastructurePalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | −8.5% | −2.4% | +101% | +89.7% | +60.6% | +180% | +299% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | — | $278B | — |
| OKTA Software - InfrastructureOkta, Inc. | 5/5 short0/2 long | +1.4% | +30.7% | +156% | +132% | +120% | +157% | −24.3% | 60.1% | 0.21 | −84.6% | — | $32B | — |
| FTNT Software - InfrastructureFortinet, Inc. | 3/5 short0/2 long | −2.5% | +6.6% | +107% | +119% | +101% | +203% | +156% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | — | $125B | — |
| QLYS Software - InfrastructureQualys, Inc. | 3/5 short0/2 long | +5.2% | +21.8% | +132% | +45.4% | +49.2% | +22.3% | +65.9% | 42.8% | 0.45 | −63.0% | — | $6.6B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 2/5 short0/2 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| NOW Software - ApplicationServiceNow, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +8.6% | +42.8% | +50.0% | +1.4% | −18.5% | +37.8% | +9.8% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | — | $155B | — |
| SNOW Software - ApplicationSnowflake Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | −5.8% | +16.5% | +112% | +47.5% | +30.1% | +116% | −4.3% | 62.6% | 0.29 | −73.0% | — | $113B | — |
| ZS Software - InfrastructureZscaler, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +3.6% | +43.2% | +59.1% | −2.7% | −29.9% | +32.3% | −27.9% | 57.9% | 0.18 | −76.4% | — | $35B | — |
| RPD Software - InfrastructureRapid7, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +6.0% | +10.6% | +127% | −7.4% | −29.6% | −73.4% | −89.4% | 58.4% | -0.48 | −96.4% | — | $891M | — |
| FFIV Software - InfrastructureF5, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | +1.5% | +10.9% | +45.4% | +78.0% | +54.0% | +208% | +120% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | — | $26B | — |
| CSCO Communication EquipmentCisco Systems, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −3.9% | −3.2% | +22.6% | +42.2% | +53.8% | +118% | +118% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $421B | — |
| DDOG Software - ApplicationDatadog, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | +4.6% | −2.6% | +97.6% | +91.7% | +64.1% | +198% | +61.4% | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | $92B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| CHKP Software - InfrastructureCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 1/5 short0/2 long | +4.9% | +3.8% | +2.0% | −22.2% | −27.1% | +4.6% | +14.8% | 29.0% | 0.24 | −51.8% | — | $14B | — |
| RDWR Software - InfrastructureRadware Ltd. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −0.6% | −3.6% | +14.6% | +23.3% | +14.4% | +84.0% | −16.3% | 38.8% | 0.10 | −65.5% | — | $1.2B | — |
| VRNS Software - InfrastructureVaronis Systems, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | +0.5% | +2.6% | +99.4% | +51.9% | −21.8% | +51.1% | −23.3% | 53.7% | 0.20 | −78.2% | — | $5.6B | — |
| TENB Software - InfrastructureTenable Holdings, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | +7.7% | +3.2% | +99.7% | +71.5% | +31.0% | −8.7% | −24.0% | 47.7% | 0.12 | −74.4% | — | $4.3B | — |
| S Software - InfrastructureSentinelOne, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −7.6% | +13.1% | +53.6% | +50.3% | +28.4% | +37.7% | −64.8% | 62.9% | -0.01 | −84.4% | — | $7.5B | — |
| NET Software - InfrastructureCloudflare, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −17.1% | +7.0% | +42.3% | +48.7% | +36.8% | +391% | +66.1% | 69.1% | 0.49 | −82.6% | — | $104B | — |
| GEN Software - InfrastructureGen Digital Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −17.4% | −9.3% | +19.0% | −6.3% | −8.1% | +48.7% | +2.2% | 32.9% | 0.18 | −48.4% | — | $14B | — |
| AKAM Software - InfrastructureAkamai Technologies, Inc. | 0/5 short0/2 long | −23.7% | −27.2% | −8.2% | +5.3% | +20.7% | −13.8% | −17.1% | 39.2% | 0.10 | −46.8% | — | $13B | — |
How did CRWD do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2020, along with where CRWD ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CRWD and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: CRWD began trading on June 12, 2019, so the table starts with 2020, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
- CRWD finished ahead of the S&P 500 in four of its six full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CRWD finished in the top quarter in four of six years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 22.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives came out ahead of CRWD in most of the years they have in common.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CRWD; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CRWD among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CRWD | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD This pageCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | — | +37.0% | +34.0% | +143% | −48.6% | −3.3% | +325% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 6 | 3 of 22 | 6 of 22 | 1 of 22 | 12 of 22 | 18 of 21 | 3 of 20 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 6 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 2 of 6 | +1.2% | +23.4% | +111% | −24.8% | +56.7% | +53.7% |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 0 of 6 | +9.7% | −13.0% | +32.5% | −69.5% | −11.8% | +120% |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −16.0% | +61.4% | +19.7% | −32.0% | +142% | +39.2% |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −5.2% | −28.6% | +74.9% | −18.2% | +12.6% | +46.2% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 2 of 6 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −27.8% | +50.0% | +82.0% | −40.2% | +17.9% | +95.0% |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 2 of 5 | +42.1% | −22.4% | +38.6% | −57.6% | +20.4% | — |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | 1 of 6 | +24.7% | −18.6% | +98.0% | −65.2% | +60.9% | +329% |
| RPD Rapid7, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −62.2% | −29.5% | +68.0% | −71.1% | +30.5% | +60.9% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 3 of 6 | +1.5% | +40.5% | +24.7% | −41.3% | +39.1% | +26.0% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2 of 6 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −4.8% | +17.7% | +65.1% | −58.7% | +80.9% | +161% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 2 of 6 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 1 of 6 | −0.6% | +22.2% | +21.1% | +8.2% | −12.3% | +19.8% |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | 2 of 6 | +6.9% | +35.1% | −15.5% | −52.6% | +50.0% | +7.6% |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −26.2% | −1.9% | +89.1% | −50.9% | −10.6% | +111% |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −40.3% | −14.5% | +20.7% | −30.7% | +5.4% | +118% |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 0 of 4 | −32.4% | −19.1% | +88.1% | −71.1% | — | — |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 3 of 6 | +83.1% | +29.3% | +84.2% | −65.6% | +73.0% | +345% |
| GEN Gen Digital Inc. | 2 of 6 | +1.1% | +22.4% | +9.2% | −15.8% | +27.6% | +44.4% |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −8.8% | −19.2% | +40.4% | −28.0% | +11.5% | +21.6% |
Risk and diversification
How CRWD has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CRWD's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CRWD's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2019, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: CRWD began trading on June 12, 2019, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of CRWD's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CRWD fell 44.4% from July to August 2024, while the S&P 500 slipped only 2.3%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 12 months, after CRWD fell 67.7% from November 2021 to January 2023.
Green means CRWD fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CRWD fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −67.7% | −15.3% | Nov 2021 | Jan 2023 | 14 months | Jan 2024 | 12 months |
| Covid crash | −66.9% | −17.2% | Aug 2019 | Mar 2020 | 7 months | Jun 2020 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −44.4% | −2.3% | Jul 2024 | Aug 2024 | 1 month | Jan 2025 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −37.2% | +1.2% | Nov 2025 | Feb 2026 | 3 months | May 2026 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −32.2% | −8.3% | Feb 2025 | Mar 2025 | 1 month | May 2025 | 2 months |
How did CRWD do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CRWD, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: CRWD began trading on June 12, 2019, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- CRWD fell further than the S&P 500 in all three crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when CRWD fell 42.7% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, PANW held up best, falling less than CRWD in all three crashes they both traded through.
- CRWD began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but eight of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was CHKP's 34.4%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CRWD.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD This pageCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | — | −7.1% | −42.7% | −50.0% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 3 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −2.1% | −30.6% | −46.8% | −29.1% | −3.3% | −40.2% | — | — | — | — |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −7.0% | −76.4% | −31.1% | −33.4% | −2.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −4.9% | −30.6% | −36.5% | −29.0% | −4.4% | −50.2% | −23.0% | −4.1% | — | — |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −4.2% | −24.9% | −27.9% | −24.4% | −6.2% | −55.8% | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 3 of 3 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −7.2% | −39.9% | −28.8% | −20.6% | −8.5% | −47.6% | — | — | — | — |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.8% | −64.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −8.3% | −55.3% | −39.4% | −24.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RPD Rapid7, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −19.3% | −65.8% | −39.5% | −28.2% | −3.3% | −62.2% | — | — | — | — |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −5.6% | −42.7% | −32.1% | −24.7% | −5.5% | −35.0% | −31.6% | −3.7% | −59.2% | −96.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −9.5% | −53.0% | −38.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 3 of 3 | −1.9% | −26.6% | −30.2% | −15.9% | −3.5% | −16.7% | −18.5% | −1.3% | −34.4% | −89.3% |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | 1 of 3 | −7.0% | −45.4% | −29.8% | −18.9% | −3.5% | −49.2% | −42.6% | −2.9% | −70.5% | −88.9% |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −12.4% | −54.6% | −44.3% | −31.5% | −4.4% | −43.4% | — | — | — | — |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −5.2% | −51.8% | −40.9% | −47.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −10.4% | −59.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −11.1% | −69.5% | −31.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GEN Gen Digital Inc. | 2 of 3 | −10.5% | −33.6% | −19.8% | −22.7% | −5.5% | −17.1% | −20.8% | −5.5% | −55.7% | −63.1% |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −4.9% | −36.0% | −21.9% | −20.6% | −4.9% | −47.6% | −39.2% | −4.5% | −77.0% | −99.8% |
How closely does CRWD move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CRWD with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CRWD's 3.21.
- Over the past 5 years, CRWD captured 122% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 38% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.19. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- PANW took just -13% of the S&P 500's losses, against 38% for CRWD, while still keeping 104% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CRWD's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD This pageCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 122% | 38% | 3.21 | 1.19 |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 118% | 72% | 1.65 | 1.64 |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 119% | 75% | 1.59 | 1.03 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 98% | 75% | 1.31 | 0.99 |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 65% | 53% | 1.22 | 0.61 |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 102% | 83% | 1.22 | 1.03 |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 112% | 119% | 0.94 | 1.51 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 115% | 126% | 0.91 | 1.10 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 125% | 170% | 0.74 | 1.45 |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 53% | 80% | 0.66 | 0.47 |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 83% | 134% | 0.62 | 1.35 |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 85% | 142% | 0.60 | 0.99 |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 66% | 117% | 0.56 | 0.62 |
| GEN Gen Digital Inc. | 97% | 177% | 0.55 | 1.26 |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | 55% | 114% | 0.48 | 0.87 |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 39% | 87% | 0.45 | 0.74 |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | 48% | 116% | 0.41 | 1.00 |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | 39% | 105% | 0.37 | 0.93 |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | 23% | 74% | 0.32 | 0.77 |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 16% | 129% | 0.12 | 0.70 |
| RPD Rapid7, Inc. | -17% | 238% | -0.07 | 1.02 |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 104% | -13% | — | 0.93 |
What diversifies CRWD?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CRWD's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CRWD with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CRWD into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+33.9% for CRWD alone, +33.7% for the mix).
- LVHI made money in two of the two calendar years in which CRWD lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of CRWD over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.11 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CRWD lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CRWD and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2021 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +221% | 0.71 | −48.6% | −3.3% | 55.6% | +33.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | -0.23 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | +17.8% | 44.1% | +33.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.11 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +18.0% | 44.8% | +35.6% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | -0.10 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | +23.1% | 44.3% | +33.4% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | -0.17 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | +19.6% | 44.1% | +32.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.37 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | +42.1% | 47.5% | +37.7% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.10 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | +19.6% | 44.8% | +32.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.11 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −4.2% | 44.2% | +34.3% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.42 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | +22.7% | 46.4% | +34.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2021 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +221% | 0.71 | −48.6% | −3.3% | 55.6% | +33.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.10 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −0.4% | 45.3% | +38.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.28 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | +37.9% | 49.0% | +51.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.11 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +89.0% | 46.3% | +48.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.09 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +44.2% | 44.3% | +38.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | -0.03 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | +61.0% | 44.7% | +41.1% |
Common questions
What was CRWD's worst drawdown?
CRWD's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 67.7%, from November 2021 to January 2023. It took 12 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because CRWD launched in June 2019, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
What were CRWD's best and worst years?
Over six full calendar years, CRWD's best year was 2020, when it returned 325%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -48.6%.
Is there a better investment than CRWD?
Among CRWD's popular alternatives, PANW earned more than CRWD with less volatility over the past 5 years: 31.9% a year at 43.4% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 52.7%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AVGO (semiconductors) and ANET (communications equipment) earned more than CRWD with less volatility over the past 5 years. AVGO returned 48.3% a year at 44.5% volatility, against 26.3% a year at 52.7%.
Is CRWD more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CRWD's volatility over the past 5 years was 52.7%, 3.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CRWD's return lands within 52.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CRWD's Sharpe ratio?
CRWD's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.71, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CRWD earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CRWD with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CRWD's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.34 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CRWD instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CRWD holding.
What are the best alternatives to CRWD?
None of the 21 popular alternatives we compared outperformed CRWD in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, which says more about CRWD's strength than about its alternatives.
Did CRWD outperform the S&P 500?
CRWD finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of six full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +37.0%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CRWD do in stock market crashes?
CRWD fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the three major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when CRWD fell 42.7% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies CRWD?
These had a low correlation with CRWD over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation -0.23), DXJ (correlation 0.11) and EMLP (correlation -0.10); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.10), CLS (correlation 0.28) and FIX (correlation 0.11). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CRWD's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CRWD's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to CRWD
PANWPalo Alto Networks
FTNTFortinet
MSFTMicrosoft
NOWServiceNow
SNOWSnowflake
CSCOCisco Systems
DDOGDatadog
AMZNAmazon.com
NETCloudflare