Relative Intelligence · E-Commerce

How PDD compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on PDD alone. It places PDD (PDD Holdings Inc.) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where PDD stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: PDD's full trading record, from July 2018 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, PDD fell 21.7% while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. The slide is PDD's own: it is 59.8% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?PDD held up far better than its industry: it fell 5.1% over the past 3 months while the e-commerce ETF KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) fell 11.3%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its e-commerce peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SHOP (Shopify) rose 39.4%, while SE (Sea) fell 23.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsPDD has gone against the market, falling 38.0% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (20.6% against 89.3%). PDD led its e-commerce peers in 2023, then fell behind AMZN (Amazon.com) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termPDD turned $10,000 into $8,210 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, PDD fell 61.4%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than AMZN (Amazon.com, 39.6%) but less than SHOP (Shopify, 79.0%). PDD fell further than the S&P 500 in two of the last three sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (61.4% against 24.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, PDD has a correlation of -0.01 over 5 years, less closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. Even so, over 5 years, PDD's beta versus the S&P 500 was -0.04: -1% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 17% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- GOOG (Alphabet), META (Meta Platforms) and AMZN (Amazon.com) earned more than PDD with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against a loss of 3.9% a year at 66.0%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- WMT (Walmart, e-commerce theme) and MSFT (Microsoft, software) earned more than PDD with less volatility over the past 5 years. WMT returned 20.8% a year at 22.6% volatility, against a loss of 3.9% a year at 66.0%.
- Whole market
- 2,608 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PDD with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA (NVIDIA), AAPL (Apple) and GOOG (Alphabet).
How much would $10,000 in PDD have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in PDD over the past 8 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of PDD over the same span and PDD's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: PDD began trading on July 26, 2018, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 8 years of PDD's record, starting at the end of September 2018.
- $10,000 invested in PDD at the end of September 2018 would have grown to $29,647 by September 2026, about the same as the $29,568 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of PDD, and SHOP finished highest, at $90,152.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2018 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 618 of the 3,000 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PDD; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SHOP$90,152+802% total · +31.6% a year
- GOOG$57,644+476% total · +24.5% a year
- MELI$50,769+408% total · +22.5% a year
- META$44,513+345% total · +20.5% a year
- EBAY$36,419+264% total · +17.5% a year
- PDD$29,647+196% total · +14.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$29,568+196% total · +14.5% a year
- AMZN$24,877+149% total · +12.1% a year
- ETSY$13,914+39.1% total · +4.2% a year
- W$6,945−30.6% total · −4.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,819 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PDD; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- META$21,571+116% total · +16.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- EBAY$16,622+66.2% total · +10.7% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
- SHOP$10,938+9.4% total · +1.8% a year
- MELI$10,293+2.9% total · +0.6% a year
- PDD$8,596−14.0% total · −3.0% a year
- YMM$5,703−43.0% total · −10.6% a year
- W$4,014−59.9% total · −16.7% a year
PDD at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: PDD began trading on July 26, 2018, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
- PDD is still 59.8% below its all-time high.
- PDD's deepest decline since it began trading in 2018 was 87.4%, from February 2021 to March 2022. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over seven full calendar years, PDD's best was 2020, when it returned 370%, and its worst was 2021, when it lost 67.2%. It lost money in two of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $116B
- Industry
- Specialty Retail
- Price history from
- July 2018
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −38.0%total return
- Past 3 years
- −20.6%−7.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- −17.9%−3.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +370%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −67.2%2021
- Losing years
- 2 of 7full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 66.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.26return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −87.4%Feb 2021 to Mar 2022
- From its all-time high
- −59.8%below the peak
PDD against the whole market
Where PDD ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does PDD rank among all stocks?
This section ranks PDD on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how PDD stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- PDD's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 9% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | PDD | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −38.0% | 2,980 of 3,287 | bottom 10% |
| 3-year return | −20.6% | 2,600 of 3,017 | bottom 15% |
| 5-year return | −17.9% | 1,976 of 2,893 | bottom 33% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 66.0% | 2,432 of 2,893 | bottom 17% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.26 | 1,671 of 2,893 | bottom 43% |
What has beaten PDD on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). PDD sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than PDD with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,630 stocks and 978 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than PDD over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 72% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half PDD's swings, CLS has the best return for its risk: 101% a year at 59.7% volatility, 10% less than PDD's 66.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.47 against 0.26 for PDD.
- Among PDD's popular alternatives, GOOG, META and EBAY are in the region. GOOG earned 19.0% a year against a loss of 3.9% a year for PDD, at 32.0% volatility, 52% less than PDD's 66.0%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to PDD; faint dots are 92 more of the 2,608 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than PDD?
Investments that beat PDD over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among PDD's popular alternatives, GOOG, META and AMZN earned more than PDD with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against a loss of 3.9% a year at 66.0%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WMT (e-commerce theme) and MSFT (software) earned more than PDD with less volatility over the past 5 years. WMT returned 20.8% a year at 22.6% volatility, against a loss of 3.9% a year at 66.0%.
- Across the whole market, 2,608 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PDD with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA, AAPL and GOOG.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat PDD over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks PDD's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than PDD follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than PDD's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× PDD's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than PDD's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with PDD?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −3.9% | 66.0% | 0.26 | −87.4% | −17.9% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | -0.01 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against PDD. 6 of 17 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +138% | 0.07 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.5% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | +106% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +53.8% | -0.05 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.7% | 32.9% | 0.50 | −53.6% | +74.2% | 0.09 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +3.2% | 49.5% | 0.31 | −69.1% | +17.2% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +3.1% | 66.9% | 0.38 | −84.8% | +16.6% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in E-Commerce and the categories next to it (Specialty Retail, Software, Internet Services, Freight & Logistics), plus PDD's specific themes. 82 of 133 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +158% | -0.15 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +80.3% | 0.05 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +299% | -0.13 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +147% | 0.04 | — | ||
ZETAZeta Global Holdings Corp. · Software | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.2% | 70.5% | 0.77 | −70.0% | +320% | -0.02 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | −3.2% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | −14.8% | 0.04 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,755 of 3,484 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.05 | −0.2% | +19.9% | 0.18 | 0.14% | ||
VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +25.6% | 0.22 | 0.30% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +123% | -0.09 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +180% | 0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +126% | 0.14 | 0.40% | ||
FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.48 | −13.5% | +24.5% | 0.11 | 0.15% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +29.5% | 65.2% | 0.72 | −61.9% | +264% | -0.15 | — | ||
ALCAlcon Inc. · Medical Devices | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | −3.2% | 27.0% | 0.01 | −37.9% | −15.2% | 0.11 | — | |
What these numbers mean for PDD
- Annual return
- PDD lost 3.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $8,210. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- PDD's volatility over the past 5 years was 66.0%, 3.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PDD's return lands within 66.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- PDD's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.26, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PDD earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- PDD's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 87.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 87.4% fall takes a 694% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, PDD's monthly returns had a correlation of -0.01 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are close to unrelated, or move in opposite directions, so it can steady a stock portfolio. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PDD instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PDD holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2,608 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than PDD with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with PDD | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +3.7% | 0.3% | 14.05 | −0.2% | +19.9% | 0.18 | 0.14% | |
| 2 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +25.6% | 0.22 | 0.30% |
| 3 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +123% | -0.09 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +180% | 0.02 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +126% | 0.14 | 0.40% | |
| 6 | FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.48 | −13.5% | +24.5% | 0.11 | 0.15% |
| 7 | Whole market | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.94 | −6.3% | +14.0% | -0.03 | 0.03% | |
| 8 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.13 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +690% | 0.02 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +705% | 0.07 | — | |
| 11 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | +28.0% | 0.23 | 0.20% |
| 12 | Whole market | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +884% | -0.07 | — | |
| 13 | NEARiShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF · Short-Term Bonds | Whole market | +3.9% | 1.4% | 2.71 | −9.6% | +20.9% | 0.25 | 0.25% |
| 14 | Whole market | +2.3% | 2.9% | 0.80 | −12.9% | +12.1% | 0.23 | 0.03% | |
| 15 | Whole market | +7.7% | 31.1% | 0.40 | −59.7% | +44.9% | -0.02 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +594% | 0.04 | — | |
| 17 | VNLAJanus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.0% | 1.1% | 3.77 | −4.5% | +21.8% | 0.24 | 0.25% |
| 18 | Same or nearby category | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +158% | -0.15 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | -0.05 | — | |
| 20 | FLRNState Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.7% | 2.58 | −14.7% | +24.4% | 0.14 | 0.15% |
| 21 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +133% | -0.11 | — | |
| 22 | SHYiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF · Treasury Bonds | Whole market | +1.8% | 2.0% | 0.89 | −5.7% | +9.3% | 0.18 | 0.15% |
| 23 | Whole market | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +1,636% | -0.15 | — | |
| 24 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +45.1% | 0.13 | — |
| 25 | FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +3.9% | 1.2% | 3.09 | −12.2% | +20.9% | 0.26 | 0.15% |
| 26 | Whole market | +12.3% | 27.3% | 0.56 | −43.8% | +78.5% | -0.10 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +187% | -0.07 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +101% | 59.7% | 1.47 | −80.6% | +3,143% | 0.11 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +617% | -0.04 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +293% | 0.16 | — | |
| 31 | RAVINorthern Trust Ultra-Short Fixed Income ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +3.8% | 1.4% | 2.61 | −3.7% | +20.2% | 0.28 | 0.26% |
| 32 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | -0.24 | — | |
| 33 | MEARiShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +2.4% | 1.0% | 2.37 | −2.7% | +12.8% | 0.16 | 0.26% |
| 34 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +72.6% | 0.00 | 0.03% | |
| 35 | Whole market | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +1,244% | -0.10 | — | |
| 36 | SUBiShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF · Municipal Bonds | Whole market | +1.4% | 1.7% | 0.85 | −9.4% | +7.3% | 0.25 | 0.07% |
| 37 | USTBVictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +3.6% | 2.0% | 1.73 | −5.3% | +19.1% | 0.22 | 0.34% |
| 38 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +82.3% | -0.01 | 0.03% | |
| 39 | LMBSFirst Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF · Mortgage-Backed Securities | Whole market | +3.0% | 2.6% | 1.14 | −6.5% | +15.8% | 0.29 | 0.66% |
| 40 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +87.8% | -0.20 | — | |
| 41 | CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,082% | 0.04 | — |
| 42 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +232% | -0.04 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +35.7% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | +359% | -0.01 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +122% | 0.10 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +218% | -0.07 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +5.3% | 60.0% | 0.39 | −73.6% | +29.5% | -0.06 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | 0.33 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +82.1% | -0.11 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +82.5% | 0.02 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +366% | 0.10 | — | |
| 51 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | 0.04 | 0.48% |
| 52 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | 0.18 | 0.40% |
| 53 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +98.2% | 0.00 | — | |
| 54 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | +35.7% | 0.12 | 0.69% |
| 55 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +144% | -0.06 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +288% | -0.04 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +800% | -0.06 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +48.6% | 0.23 | 0.05% | |
| 59 | Whole market | +17.4% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | +123% | -0.03 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +97.2% | -0.06 | 0.18% | |
| 61 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +319% | 0.09 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +79.2% | 0.01 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +159% | 0.06 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +37.4% | 49.9% | 0.89 | −56.4% | +390% | -0.04 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +118% | -0.16 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +667% | 0.06 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +634% | -0.06 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +159% | 0.14 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +413% | -0.13 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +113% | -0.11 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +121% | -0.04 | — | |
| 72 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | +839% | 0.16 | — |
| 73 | LDURPIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +2.4% | 2.1% | 1.13 | −8.7% | +12.3% | 0.21 | 0.54% |
| 74 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +33.9% | 0.23 | 0.60% |
| 75 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +329% | -0.11 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +76.6% | 0.02 | 0.03% | |
| 77 | Whole market | +12.4% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | +79.8% | 0.00 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +866% | -0.01 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +25.8% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | +215% | -0.03 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +217% | 0.10 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +135% | 0.02 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +413% | -0.02 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +295% | 0.27 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +145% | 0.05 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +413% | 0.23 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +145% | 0.12 | — | |
| 87 | JPIBJPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +2.5% | 4.2% | 0.62 | −13.1% | +13.3% | 0.17 | 0.50% |
| 88 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +524% | 0.04 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +55.9% | 0.15 | 0.03% | |
| 90 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +110% | 0.19 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +109% | 0.13 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +355% | -0.09 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +53.7% | 53.5% | 1.07 | −70.5% | +759% | 0.02 | — | |
| 94 | TRTootsie Roll Industries, Inc. · Food Confectioners | Whole market | +7.8% | 25.2% | 0.42 | −36.4% | +45.6% | 0.04 | — |
| 95 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +326% | 0.09 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +301% | 0.20 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +129% | 0.23 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +116% | 0.04 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +28.3% | -0.02 | — | |
| 100 | BELFBBel Fuse Inc. · Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Whole market | +78.0% | 52.1% | 1.37 | −79.8% | +1,688% | -0.02 | — |
PDD against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against PDD, compared period by period and year by year.
How do PDD's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at PDD, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Five of the 17 popular alternatives, led by GOOG, META and EBAY, were both more rewarding and calmer than PDD over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, PDD returned -3.9% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (66.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than PDD with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | +15.5% | 45.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| EBAY eBay Inc. | +11.7% | 32.9% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | +3.2% | 49.5% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | +3.1% | 66.9% |
| PDD This pagePDD Holdings Inc. | −3.9% | 66.0% |
| ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | −6.3% | 38.2% |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | −8.2% | 51.3% |
| GXO GXO Logistics, Inc. | −10.9% | 42.2% |
| YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | −10.9% | 65.7% |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | −13.1% | 52.0% |
| W Wayfair Inc. | −14.5% | 81.8% |
| ETSY Etsy, Inc. | −17.8% | 55.4% |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | −18.6% | 52.6% |
| SE Sea Limited | −25.9% | 64.6% |
| BZUN Baozun Inc. | −29.0% | 73.6% |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | −29.9% | 77.4% |
Has PDD consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares PDD with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than PDD helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Six of the 17 popular alternatives, led by EBAY, SHOP and GOOG, outperformed PDD in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- EBAY, SHOP and GOOG outperformed PDD in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- GOOG, META and EBAY earned more for the risk they took than PDD (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than PDD over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. (this page) | — | +2.9% | −5.1% | −21.7% | −29.5% | −38.0% | −20.6% | −17.9% | 66.0% | 0.26 | −87.4% | — | $116B | — |
| EBAY QualifiedeBay Inc. | 5/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | +11.9% | +6.5% | +13.8% | +40.5% | +28.3% | +213% | +74.2% | 32.9% | 0.50 | −53.6% | — | $54B | — |
| SHOP QualifiedShopify Inc. | 5/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | +25.8% | +39.4% | +28.4% | +10.4% | +5.3% | +239% | +16.6% | 66.9% | 0.38 | −84.8% | — | $225B | — |
| GOOG QualifiedAlphabet Inc. | 4/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| META QualifiedMeta Platforms, Inc. | 4/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | −6.3% | +7.6% | +3.7% | +7.0% | −4.9% | +127% | +106% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | — | $1.8T | — |
| AMZN QualifiedAmazon.com, Inc. | 4/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| MELI QualifiedMercadoLibre, Inc. | 4/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | +3.2% | +2.6% | +0.5% | −4.8% | −10.6% | +60.7% | +17.2% | 49.5% | 0.31 | −69.1% | — | $95B | — |
| YMM Software - ApplicationFull Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | 5/5 short1/2 long | +8.9% | −3.5% | +1.4% | −19.0% | −28.1% | +38.1% | −44.0% | 65.7% | 0.14 | −78.3% | — | $9.2B | — |
| W Specialty RetailWayfair Inc. | 5/5 short1/2 long | +8.2% | +29.4% | +40.0% | +6.6% | +36.6% | +159% | −54.2% | 81.8% | 0.21 | −93.0% | — | $16B | — |
| ETSY Specialty RetailEtsy, Inc. | 5/5 short1/2 long | +19.0% | +4.0% | +36.2% | +52.6% | +22.5% | +34.7% | −62.5% | 55.4% | -0.08 | −86.3% | — | $8.0B | — |
| BZUN Specialty RetailBaozun Inc. | 5/5 short1/2 long | +25.9% | +47.4% | +18.2% | +31.7% | +1.1% | +35.5% | −82.0% | 73.6% | -0.11 | −97.0% | — | $215M | — |
| ZTO Integrated Freight & LogisticsZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | 4/5 short1/2 long | +4.0% | −16.3% | −20.0% | −4.3% | +7.5% | −5.6% | −27.7% | 38.2% | 0.02 | −57.1% | — | $15B | — |
| GXO Integrated Freight & LogisticsGXO Logistics, Inc. | 4/5 short1/2 long | +5.9% | −8.9% | −18.8% | −11.4% | −12.3% | −8.0% | −43.8% | 42.2% | -0.06 | −69.6% | — | $5.5B | — |
| JD Specialty RetailJD.com, Inc. | 3/5 short1/2 long | −1.9% | −12.5% | −14.7% | −6.2% | −18.0% | +20.2% | −64.3% | 52.6% | -0.14 | −79.1% | — | $36B | — |
| BABA Specialty RetailAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 1/5 short1/2 long | −6.1% | −9.7% | −21.7% | −29.6% | −36.8% | +44.5% | −34.8% | 51.3% | 0.08 | −80.1% | — | $270B | — |
| SE Specialty RetailSea Limited | 1/5 short1/2 long | −21.6% | −23.9% | −10.0% | −38.8% | −51.5% | +80.3% | −77.7% | 64.6% | -0.14 | −90.5% | — | $49B | — |
| CPNG Specialty RetailCoupang, Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | −2.1% | −12.9% | −33.4% | −38.7% | −54.8% | −18.9% | −50.3% | 52.0% | -0.01 | −81.5% | — | $26B | — |
| BILI Internet Content & InformationBilibili Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | −8.3% | −24.4% | −44.3% | −47.2% | −49.5% | +11.3% | −83.1% | 77.4% | -0.09 | −94.3% | — | $5.9B | — |
How did PDD do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2019, along with where PDD ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with PDD and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: PDD began trading on July 26, 2018, so the table starts with 2019, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
- PDD finished ahead of the S&P 500 in four of its seven full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, SHOP came out ahead of PDD most often, in five of the seven years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, PDD finished in the top quarter in three of seven years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 18.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of PDD; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places PDD among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of PDD | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD This pagePDD Holdings Inc. | — | +16.9% | −33.7% | +79.4% | +39.9% | −67.2% | +370% | +68.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 7 | 10 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 1 of 18 | 15 of 15 | 2 of 15 | 4 of 15 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 7 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% |
| EBAY eBay Inc. | 3 of 7 | +42.7% | +44.8% | +7.7% | −36.5% | +33.8% | +41.2% | +30.6% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 5 of 7 | +51.4% | +36.5% | +124% | −74.8% | +21.7% | +185% | +187% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 3 of 7 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% | +29.1% |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 3 of 7 | +13.1% | +66.0% | +194% | −64.2% | +23.1% | +33.1% | +56.6% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 2 of 7 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 5 of 7 | +18.4% | +8.2% | +85.7% | −37.2% | −19.5% | +193% | +95.3% |
| YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | 1 of 4 | +0.8% | +57.4% | −12.3% | −4.5% | — | — | — |
| W Wayfair Inc. | 4 of 7 | +127% | −28.2% | +87.6% | −82.7% | −15.9% | +150% | +0.3% |
| ETSY Etsy, Inc. | 1 of 7 | +4.8% | −34.7% | −32.3% | −45.3% | +23.1% | +302% | −6.9% |
| BZUN Baozun Inc. | 2 of 7 | −2.2% | −0.7% | −48.3% | −61.9% | −59.5% | +3.7% | +13.4% |
| ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | 2 of 7 | +10.7% | −3.7% | −19.8% | −3.8% | −2.4% | +26.2% | +49.5% |
| GXO GXO Logistics, Inc. | 2 of 4 | +21.0% | −28.9% | +43.3% | −53.0% | — | — | — |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 2 of 7 | −14.9% | +23.5% | −47.8% | −17.9% | −20.3% | +149% | +68.3% |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 3 of 7 | +75.8% | +11.8% | −10.8% | −25.9% | −49.0% | +9.7% | +54.7% |
| SE Sea Limited | 5 of 7 | +20.2% | +162% | −22.2% | −76.7% | +12.4% | +395% | +255% |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | 1 of 4 | +7.3% | +35.8% | +10.1% | −49.9% | — | — | — |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 3 of 7 | +35.8% | +48.8% | −48.6% | −48.9% | −45.9% | +360% | +27.6% |
Risk and diversification
How PDD has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were PDD's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents PDD's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2018, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: PDD began trading on July 26, 2018, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of PDD's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: PDD fell 87.4% from February 2021 to March 2022, while the S&P 500 rose 7.7%.
- None of these declines kept PDD below its old high for long; the longest climb back took five months.
Green means PDD fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | PDD fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −87.4% | +7.7% | Feb 2021 | Mar 2022 | 13 months | Not yet | — |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −42.8% | −6.0% | Sep 2018 | Nov 2018 | 2 months | Jan 2019 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −38.9% | −1.3% | Mar 2019 | Jun 2019 | 3 months | Aug 2019 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −35.5% | +1.5% | Jul 2018 | Aug 2018 | 1 month | Sep 2018 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −27.9% | +1.2% | Nov 2019 | Nov 2019 | Under a month | Apr 2020 | 5 months |
How did PDD do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far PDD, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: PDD began trading on July 26, 2018, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- PDD fell further than the S&P 500 in three of the four crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when PDD fell 61.4% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, ZTO held up best, falling less than PDD in all four crashes they both traded through.
- PDD began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but four of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was AMZN's 65.3%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than PDD.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD This pagePDD Holdings Inc. | — | −7.9% | −61.4% | −15.7% | −38.1% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 4 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| EBAY eBay Inc. | 3 of 4 | −6.6% | −44.2% | −31.6% | −23.2% | −7.4% | −25.6% | −21.8% | −3.5% | −74.7% | −77.1% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 2 of 4 | −5.1% | −79.0% | −40.7% | −27.6% | −5.4% | −49.2% | — | — | — | — |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 3 of 4 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 2 of 4 | −2.9% | −62.1% | −32.9% | −26.5% | −9.8% | −13.9% | — | — | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −7.2% | −51.6% | −39.1% | −30.3% | −8.8% | −31.9% | −39.5% | 0.0% | −89.5% | — |
| YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | 2 of 2 | −7.1% | −52.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| W Wayfair Inc. | 0 of 4 | −15.8% | −83.8% | −71.4% | −45.5% | −3.3% | −40.5% | — | — | — | — |
| ETSY Etsy, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −8.4% | −65.7% | −49.3% | −25.1% | −5.6% | −63.3% | — | — | — | — |
| BZUN Baozun Inc. | 0 of 4 | −9.4% | −63.0% | −30.8% | −41.9% | −8.1% | −46.5% | — | — | — | — |
| ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | 4 of 4 | −2.4% | −33.6% | −14.7% | −16.8% | −4.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| GXO GXO Logistics, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −11.4% | −62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 2 of 4 | −14.6% | −45.1% | −21.0% | −27.3% | −8.2% | −29.9% | — | — | — | — |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 3 of 4 | −4.7% | −45.1% | −20.6% | −20.7% | −7.3% | −29.1% | — | — | — | — |
| SE Sea Limited | 1 of 4 | −8.0% | −73.3% | −27.7% | −26.4% | −8.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −7.3% | −64.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 1 of 4 | −8.0% | −70.2% | −28.2% | −17.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does PDD move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares PDD with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- Over the past 5 years, PDD captured -1% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 17% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of -0.04. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
- 14 of the 17 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than PDD's -0.05, led by GOOG, META and EBAY.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than PDD's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD This pagePDD Holdings Inc. | -1% | 17% | -0.05 | -0.04 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 140% | 132% | 1.07 | 1.20 |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 139% | 150% | 0.92 | 1.18 |
| EBAY eBay Inc. | 121% | 153% | 0.80 | 1.33 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 125% | 170% | 0.74 | 1.45 |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 203% | 331% | 0.61 | 2.62 |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 84% | 146% | 0.57 | 1.31 |
| W Wayfair Inc. | 198% | 433% | 0.46 | 3.01 |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 76% | 167% | 0.45 | 0.48 |
| GXO GXO Logistics, Inc. | 85% | 219% | 0.39 | 1.57 |
| SE Sea Limited | 81% | 283% | 0.29 | 1.54 |
| ETSY Etsy, Inc. | 52% | 221% | 0.23 | 1.85 |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | 27% | 135% | 0.20 | 1.16 |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 8% | 122% | 0.07 | 0.33 |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 9% | 197% | 0.05 | 0.65 |
| YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | -6% | 58% | -0.11 | 0.22 |
| BZUN Baozun Inc. | -24% | 170% | -0.14 | 0.39 |
| ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. | -21% | 2% | -8.76 | -0.20 |
What diversifies PDD?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with PDD's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing PDD with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in PDD into FIX would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-3.0% for PDD alone, +16.0% for the mix).
- FIX made money in two of the two calendar years in which PDD lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of PDD over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.18 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which PDD lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% PDD and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2021 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −17.9% | 0.26 | −33.7% | −67.2% | 58.4% | −3.0% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.18 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +17.8% | 47.1% | +3.0% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.04 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +18.0% | 46.9% | +4.9% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.02 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +23.1% | 46.9% | +3.0% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.00 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +19.6% | 46.8% | +2.4% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.02 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +42.1% | 47.1% | +7.7% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.10 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | +19.6% | 47.0% | +2.5% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.14 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −4.2% | 47.3% | +3.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | -0.13 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +22.7% | 46.4% | +4.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2021 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −17.9% | 0.26 | −33.7% | −67.2% | 58.4% | −3.0% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | -0.05 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | −0.4% | 46.8% | +7.4% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.11 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +37.9% | 49.4% | +18.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | -0.15 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +89.0% | 46.3% | +16.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.13 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +44.2% | 46.3% | +6.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.02 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +61.0% | 47.3% | +9.1% |
Common questions
What was PDD's worst drawdown?
PDD's deepest decline since it began trading in 2018 was 87.4%, from February 2021 to March 2022. It has not yet climbed back to that peak. Because PDD launched in July 2018, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or four other sell-offs.
What were PDD's best and worst years?
Over seven full calendar years, PDD's best year was 2020, when it returned 370%. Its worst was 2021, with a return of -67.2%.
Is there a better investment than PDD?
Among PDD's popular alternatives, GOOG, META and AMZN earned more than PDD with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against a loss of 3.9% a year at 66.0%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WMT (e-commerce theme) and MSFT (software) earned more than PDD with less volatility over the past 5 years. WMT returned 20.8% a year at 22.6% volatility, against a loss of 3.9% a year at 66.0%.
Is PDD more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. PDD's volatility over the past 5 years was 66.0%, 3.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PDD's return lands within 66.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is PDD's Sharpe ratio?
PDD's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.26, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PDD earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is PDD with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, PDD's monthly returns had a correlation of -0.01 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are close to unrelated, or move in opposite directions, so it can steady a stock portfolio. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PDD instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PDD holding.
What are the best alternatives to PDD?
Of the 17 popular alternatives we compared, six outperformed PDD in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: EBAY, SHOP and GOOG.
Did PDD outperform the S&P 500?
PDD finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of seven full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +16.9%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did PDD do in stock market crashes?
PDD fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the four major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when PDD fell 61.4% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies PDD?
These had a low correlation with PDD over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.18), DXJ (correlation 0.04) and EMLP (correlation 0.02); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.05), CLS (correlation 0.11) and FIX (correlation -0.15). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than PDD's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of PDD's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to PDD
EBAYeBay
SHOPShopify
GOOGAlphabet
METAMeta Platforms
AMZNAmazon.com
MELIMercadoLibre
BABAAlibaba Group Holding
SESea